California Medical Board Urged to End Bias Against Rx Opioids
/By Pat Anson, PNN Editor
The Medical Board of California got an earful from doctors, patients and their advocates during a public hearing Thursday on proposed changes to the board’s guideline for prescribing opioids and other controlled substances. Most speakers praised changes to the guideline that give physicians more flexibility in prescribing higher doses of opioids, but said they don’t go far enough.
“It continues to reflect pervasive bias that we find just about everywhere against the use of opioid pain medication,” said Kristen Ogden of Families for Intractable Pain Relief, a patient advocacy group. “There seems to be an underlying assumption that opioids are bad. Risks vs. benefit is often mentioned, but potential benefits receive very little attention in the draft. It’s kind of like a form of subliminal messaging.”
The board’s draft proposal continues to maintain that opioids “should not be the first line of treatment” for patients with chronic non-cancer pain and recommends that physicians “use extra precautions” when increasing doses above 50 morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Urine drug tests and pill counts are also strongly recommended for patients on long-term opioid therapy. Forced or rapid tapering of patients is discouraged, and doctors are urged to give patients at least 30 days’ notice before discharging them.
“Opioid prescribing has been a major hot button issue for several years,” said board member Richard Thorp, MD, former president of the California Medical Association. “Our concern primarily is patient safety, and part of that patient safety is being able to prescribe to those patients that critically need these medications (in) a safe and viable environment.”
Thorp headed a task force that reviewed the medical board’s policies, which like many others around the country are modeled after the CDC’s 2016 opioid guideline.
“Unfortunately, many agencies, health plans and other kinds of oversight agencies took the guidelines as very strict guidelines,” said Thorp. “As result, many people who were on larger doses of opioid medications for chronic conditions that were intractable were significantly disadvantaged. Maybe that’s an extreme understatement. Many of them were really harmed by rapid tapering off of medications. Many primary care physicians, in particular, on which this burden had fallen basically backed out of the arena in prescribing chronic narcotics.”
The CDC has acknowledged the harm its opioid guideline has caused, but has been slow in revising it. An updated guideline is not expected to be finalized until late this year, nearly seven years after the original guideline was released.
‘It Has Killed People’
The medical board heard from several patients and physicians who are critical of its past efforts to rein in opioid prescribing, such as the board’s controversial “Death Certificate Project,” which resulted in hundreds of letters threatening disciplinary action being sent to doctors who prescribed opioids to patients who later overdosed. A study found that overdose deaths doubled in California after the project was launched, with many of the deaths linked to street drugs, not prescription opioids.
“It has killed people. My son is one of those people,” said Rosie Arthur, who said her son was abruptly taken off opioids after 24 years and put on antidepressants, which led to his death. “I don’t want to see anybody else die needlessly.”
Doctors told the board its enforcement efforts have had a chilling effect on pain management across the state.
“Some of our physicians are under investigation for compliance with these guidelines, which are resulting in serious unintended consequences,” said Lee Snook, Jr., MD, a pain management specialist in Sacramento. “Our physicians specializing in pain management have stopped taking new referrals, leaving patients and their primary physicians without local accessible options for complex pain management. One of these physicians announced his retirement last week.”
“We have found it impossible to find pain consultants. There is nobody to refer our pain patients to, particularly patients who are on public programs. There is nobody in our community who will manage chronic medical pain,” said Aaron Roland, MD, a family physician in Burlingame. “Unfortunately, one of our clinicians recently had to leave us, leave our practice, because she had to devote herself full time to defending herself in a case brought by the Medical Board of California for opiate prescribing.”
“In the minds of our primary care docs, they really don’t want to have anything to do with any level of pain management for fear they will lose their license and lose their job,” said Michael Conroy, MD, chief medical officer for a large primary care practice in Sacramento. Conroy pointed out the board’s draft guideline uses the word “should” 44 times and the word “must” seven times.
“Very few of these statements are backed by much in the way of hard science,” he said. “The use of this language can be viewed as signaling an intent to use these statements to discipline doctors who aren’t perfect. Nobody is ever going to be perfect in documenting or attending to 51 separate things on a simple visit with a chronic pain patient.”
Conroy urged the board to modify its draft guideline to indicate that most of its recommendations are based on opinion and should not be used for disciplinary purposes or viewed as hard requirements.
