Winter Taught Me a Better Way to Cope with Chronic Pain

By Crystal Lindell

We’ve already had our first snowfall here in northern Illinois. Regardless of the official day winter begins next month, snow marks the start of winter for us.

And when you have chronic pain, the season brings with it cursed gifts, offering both a time of guilt-free rest and more days of ache.

During the summer, there’s a guilt that accompanies any days spent inside, even if you’re doing it because your pain is too intense to allow for anything else. Watching TV all day makes me feel like I am personally wasting the warm weather and sunshine.  

But that is not the case in winter. Instead, the long nights and cold days allow me to embrace the comfort of staying in, curled up under layers of blankets. 

I already have my Christmas tree up, and the warm glow makes being a couch potato seem almost magical.

And since the sky turns midnight blue at 5 pm, it suddenly feels almost natural to go to bed early. 

These are things my chronic pain-riddled body enjoys year-round. But in the winter, societal expectations allow me to indulge in the impulse to take full rest days or even rest weeks, without feeling the summertime angst about it.

The change in seasons also brings with it lots of changes in barometric pressure, which means all those cozy evenings come with a downside.

My body always knows when it’s about to snow, or sleet or both. It also feels every temperature change as it happens. Anytime it goes from -10 degrees to 40 and back again, my ribs feel it. 

The result is often multiple days spent with the type of excruciating pain that barely even responds to opioid pain medication.

Over the years, I have found that the only treatment that works for those pain flares is to accept them. I can’t stress myself out about it, because it only serves to escalate the pain. So I have to try to stay as calm as possible. My body can’t handle activity under those circumstances.

Which brings me back to those guilt-free rest days that winter supplies in ample amounts. And embracing things instead of trying to fight them.

Growing up in the Midwest, I was often taught that winter was a season to be fought and denied. Just a few months that we all had to endure until the “real” weather came back. Most people here spend the winter complaining, cursing, and just trying to survive.

A few years ago, I took a trip to Montreal, Canada in January, and witnessed an entirely different approach. Despite the fact that the holiday season was well behind us, the city was filled with winter festival activities, ice statues, colorful lights, and just a general sense that the dark and cold days were actually a good thing.

The experience has since shaped my own approach to the coldest months of the year. I do my best to appreciate the gifts that gray days and eternal nights bring. It’s a time for all of us to rest, refocus, and embrace the downtime the cold weather affords us.

Embracing pain has the same effect. When you learn to let it exist, it is paradoxically easier to keep it confined to smaller flare ups.

Weather forecasters predict many of us are in for a particularly harsh winter this year, with more snow and colder temperatures. 

But that doesn’t mean it has to be a slog.

When we take the winter season as it is, it can bear its gifts of rest and time. And who among us doesn't need more of both?

Shame on Me 

By Rochelle Odell 

Why a headline like “Shame on Me”? 

I have lived with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), an intractable and painful nerve disease, for nearly 34 years. 

And I used my fear of a pain flare to avoid getting a colonoscopy. 

For four years, I thought I had hemorrhoids. They are painful, irritating and embarrassing. After all, who wants to bend over for your primary care doctor to examine them?

Yes, she said, I definitely have hemorrhoids. So I let the symptoms ride.

Parts of this column are a bit graphic. However, there’s a good reason why I’m sharing them. I don’t want you to make the same mistakes I did. 

In January of this year, after spending three days on the toilet feeling like I was trying to expel whatever was in my bowels (along with the bowels themselves), a large mass emerged. 

I saw my doctor again and she said it was hemorrhoids that had become very swollen and were bleeding.

Coupled with my CRPS, they made my pain even worse. Pain at a level I had never experienced before. It never lets up, never. 

Lest we not forget, adult diapers have become my new norm as the mass is on the rectum/sphincter, so I am now stool incontinent. Oh joy. 

ROCHELLE ODELL

This is a topic rarely discussed, but once it is brought up, I learned I am not the only one. When one discusses this, I learned others also suffer from the same problems – the same pain, the same embarrassment, and the same wearing of diapers.

My CRPS pain reached a new high and, of course, my one prescribed pain medication became a joke. It's a higher dose than many receive these days, but it basically only works for 30-45 minutes before waning.

My PCP added a new glitch to my stress level, when she sold out to an insurance company and became a private equity provider. How long would her practice continue? Not long. She retired at the end of August. 

Like most patients when we find a good provider, we do not want to lose them. Ever. I liked Dr. Powell a lot, and saw her for eight years. Being a black doctor, I believe all she had to endure to get where she did helped her be a better doctor. All her patients gave her five star reviews. 

My first question to her was did she still have autonomy when it comes to treating her patients, ordering tests, and speciality referrals? I believe that question surprised her as few people know about private equity and fewer understand the ramifications. 

She did order a referral for me to see a surgeon for a hemorrhoidectomy. Not a surgery I was looking forward to, after all it would be a whole new team that I had to bare my toosh to. So I delayed making that appointment. Shame on me. 

By June, the mass I had named George had grown. I had no choice, I had to see the surgeon. He also said the mass was hemorrhoids, no mention of anything more serious. So, the surgical procedure was scheduled. 

Not one mention of cancer, he hadn't ordered any scans or tests, so silly me thought I had a big, bleeding hemorrhoid. 

The day before the scheduled surgery, I was given the option of drinking two bottles of magnesium citrate or Golightly, a prescription laxative. I opted for the magnesium citrate, because it sounded less disruptive to my bowels. Shame on me.

Please do what I didn't, which is read about the many adverse effects that magnesium citrate can cause and did cause in me. It is not a harmless laxative.  After half the first bottle, my ears began ringing and my heart started skipping all over. It went downhill from there. I truly felt like I was going to die.

The magnesium citrate did not even do the bowel cleanse. Kept waiting for the explosion I had heard and read about. I could barely move the rest of the afternoon and my pain was creeping up.

Mind you, I haven't been eating much these last few months. I was close to 200 pounds three years ago, the heaviest I have ever been. But eating caused very painful bowel movements and I lost my appetite due to the increased pain.

I came out of anesthesia to learn the surgeon had only performed a biopsy. My pain level was approaching a 10 when he told me the bad news.

“You have cancer,” he said, matter of factly. 

I learned it is adenocarcinoma, the most common of all cancers that starts in mucous membranes, like the bowels/rectum. It totally surprised, even shocked me.  

My PCP had ordered the Cologuard test about three years ago, after I flippantly told her I don't do colonoscopies. And of course I tossed out the Cologuard order. Shame on me.  

I was sent home after the biopsy, still reeling from the magnesium citrate, and in excruciating pain. My sweet friend Stella, who has been a godsend, took me to the hospital and back home after I was discharged. I was in so much agony by the time we got home that I screamed into my pillow.

Stella urged me to call 911 and I finally did. I was taken to my local hospital where I was treated very well, and given strong doses of IV Dilaudid to manage the pain. The ER doctor ordered a CT scan, where the cancerous mass was glaring for all to see. 

Oh yeah, they had to change my diaper every hour or so, and by this point everybody and their relatives had seen my bottom. So much for being embarrassed. 

I was transferred back to the hospital where the biopsy was done and got another CT scan. I spent three days in the hospital before I was transferred to a skilled nursing facility for two weeks to gain strength and try to bring my pain under control. 

Both facilities provided adequate pain management including a fentanyl patch, oxycodone and Dilaudid. For those two weeks, I still experienced symptoms from the magnesium citrate. Never again.

I had to leave my pain management group because they don't do palliative or hospice care, and they would not add any additional pain medication. With how badly cancer patients are being treated these days, I was so afraid my meds would be reduced. But so far so good 

Because I need a portacath for imagery tests, it took four months to get an MRI scheduled at a university medical center in my area. Then I learned a doctor changed it back to another facility where they have no one to access my portacath. 

I just shake my head at this level of incompetence. I have explained multiple times why I must have it at the university medical center. I normally have no issues with an MRI, because I am not claustrophobic. But because of George, I cannot lay flat on my back and must be sedated through the portacath.

I have not fully acknowledged the cancer diagnosis. Like today, when speaking to my oncology office, I ended up crying out of frustration. These senseless delays could ultimately cause my death.  

A PET scan found a couple of small growths on each lung, so I am now waiting for the appointment for a biopsy. In the past, I have had scar tissue show up on my chest X-rays due to my asthma and I am praying it's not lung cancer. 

I have done my best to exclude sugar from my diet, as sugar feeds cancer. I have lost so much weight, I’m down to 113 pounds. I can't remember the last time I was this small. My body has lost almost all the fat it had, my ribs and collarbone stand out, glaring in the mirror at me. 

Chemotherapy and radiation haven't even started yet, and the expected weight loss from the chemo, well, I have no idea where it will come from. There is no more fat.

Living alone frightens me now. No, it terrifies me. I had to rehome one of my two dogs, because I can no longer care for myself and two dogs.

I have a whole new set of medical terminology to learn. Patients must navigate and fight for every part of needed care, when the last thing we want to do is be on the phone daily with insurance and one's Medicare provider.

I have also learned oncologists haven't heard of CRPS, a disease known to be triggered by chemotherapy. 

I am tired, don't want to talk on the phone, and believe I shouldn't have to.  My friend Stella has taken over calling and explaining all the issues. 

My pharmacy is causing me grief now, it won't cover my full oxycodone dose, so I spent over 20 minutes on the phone talking to the pharmacist. He isn't taking on new patients on opioids because his wholesaler is supposedly giving him grief. I told him I understand his position. 

In closing, please don't be like me. Don't use feeble excuses to not get a colonoscopy or let embarrassment keep you from having your doctor examine your toosh.  

What I tried to delay for dumb reasons has actually caused my pain to worsen. 

Shame on me.

Central Sensitization and Hyperalgesia Are Bogus Medical Terms

By Dr. Forest Tennant

Some 15 years ago, “central sensitization” was a term I first started seeing when I was editor of Practical Pain Management. It was defined as experiencing a pain level above what was normally expected from arthritis, fibromyalgia, neuropathy, and other peripheral (outside the brain) pain conditions. 

When central sensitization was present, it was an indication to more aggressively treat the pain with opioids and/or other measures. Unfortunately, this simple, well-meaning term has been transformed by some unscrupulous practitioners to imply that patients with central sensitization don’t need opioids or other treatment.

Central sensitization also became synonymous with the term “hyperalgesia” – meaning the patient was overreacting or feeling too much pain for their condition. What’s more, opioids were supposedly the cause of hyperalgesia, so they need to be stopped. 

Let’s be very clear. Neither “central sensitization” nor “hyperalgesia” are bonafide medical conditions. A medical condition is one in which there is a common set of symptoms and physical findings, and the condition can be confirmed by a diagnostic test such as an MRI or blood test. 

Central sensitization and hyperalgesia are bogus medical conditions that can’t be objectively identified, quantified, or diagnosed. They are simply terms that sound scientific and authoritative, when in reality they have become fraudulent terms used to justify withholding opioids and other treatments.

It is time patients, families, and physicians reject these terms and the medical practitioners who use them.

Central sensitization is not to be confused with the term “central pain.” This is a serious condition that more likely than not requires opioids, along with great care and concern on the part of the medical practitioner.

“Central pain” initially referred to the emergence of pain after a stroke. Strokes can wipe out and destroy brain tissue that contain opioid receptors and the normal biologic apparatus which shuts down and relieves pain. One especially severe post-stroke pain condition is known as the Dejerine-Roussy Syndrome, which damages the thalamus. 

Opioid drugs, sometimes in high or unusual formulations, are required for post-stroke central pain.

Although central pain was first associated with strokes, it soon became appropriate to include brain tumors, hydrocephalus, and scarring from meningitis infections, since these conditions can also wipe out brain tissue and cause pain.

In recent times, central pain has come to include those pain patients who have developed neuroinflammation and tissue destruction in the brain concomitantly with a peripheral pain problem that may involve the joints, muscles, nerves, or spine.

It is interesting to note that central pain in the past was often called “secondary pain” as it tends to occur after someone has developed a peripheral pain condition. 

The first investigator to elucidate peripheral pain conditions with brain tissue destruction was Apkarian in 2004.He and his colleagues found decreased prefrontal gray matter deficiencies in the brain scans of persons with chronic back pain. 

Since that time, a plethora of brain scan and glial cell studies have found that persons with a peripheral pain condition may experience brain inflammation involving glial cells and tissue destruction — akin to what occurs after a stroke. 

Bona fide central pain is clinically typical and obvious. It is characterized by constant (24/7) pain and high pulse rates, hypertension, episodes of excess sweating, and cold hands and feet.

Prescription opioids, including long-acting opioids, may be required to control bonafide central pain. In addition to opioids, central pain has what is called descending pain, which requires dopamine stimulating drugs to adequately control it. 

The cause of central pain that accompanies or follows the development of a peripheral pain condition is now believed to be related to an autoimmune process and/or viral reactivation, especially from the Epstein-Barr virus.

In summary, central sensitization and hyperalgesia are not bonafide medical conditions. To use these bogus labels to justify the withholding of medications is unscientific, fraudulent and inhumane. 

These terms and the practitioners who use them should be summarily rejected. Central pain is a serious condition characterized by severe constant pain which often requires opioids for pain control. 

Forest Tennant, MD, DrPH, is retired from clinical practice but continues his research on the treatment of intractable pain and arachnoiditis. Readers interested in learning more about his research should visit the Tennant Foundation’s website, Arachnoiditis Hope. You can subscribe to its research bulletins here.   

The Tennant Foundation gives financial support to Pain News Network and sponsors PNN’s Patient Resources section. 

Arachnoiditis: My Not-So-Rare Disease

By Julie Titone

I first heard the word “arachnoiditis” from the spine surgeon who performed my lumbar fusion. This was a virtual office visit. I leaned into my laptop screen to say: “That sounds like a spider.”

“Yes,” he replied.

He had identified the source of my unexpected post-op pain: arachnoiditis, a chronic inflammatory disease that’s even creepier than it sounds. Its symptoms usually arise after spinal trauma due to surgery, injury or commonly prescribed injections. 

More doctors and patients should know about this small chance of a very big problem.

Arachnoiditis is so far incurable, difficult to treat, and can get worse over time. Patients experience lower body numbness and stinging pain that, at its worst, is likened to hot water dripping down the legs. The disease can lead to paralysis and bladder dysfunction. While arachnoiditis is said to be rare, it could simply be under-diagnosed.

The arachnoid is a membrane with a webbed appearance, hence its spidery name. It is part of the sheath that encloses the spinal fluid. Arachnoiditis is the inflammation of that easily annoyed membrane. 

Sometimes it causes free-floating spinal nerves to stick together and become locked down by scar tissue. This is known as adhesive arachnoiditis, the kind I’m describing here.

No one knows how many spinal surgeries result in arachnoiditis, but a common estimate is 3 to 6 percent. Propelled in part by the deteriorating backs of boomers like me, there were more than 340,000 such surgeries in 2023 in the United States. 

Just 4% of that adds up to 13,600 people suffering from arachnoiditis in a single year in a single country. The number doesn’t include cases that emerge after spinal injections of anesthesia or steroids, or after accidents that damage the spine.

‘They Stuck Me Eight Times’

Sara Lewis was a young Florida nurse when, on New Year’s Eve in 2008, she required an emergency Caesarean section. Attempts to give her anesthesia before the surgery did not go well.

“They stuck me eight times to get the spinal block in,” she recalled. 

Lewis left the hospital with a baby boy and excruciating pain. She went back to work, eventually switching to a less-demanding job. By 2014, she couldn’t work at all and didn’t yet have a proper diagnosis. By 2017, she had qualified for disability benefits. Lewis is only 44.

Many women choose epidurals to ease pain during normal vaginal deliveries. Unlike a spinal block, an epidural delivers anesthesia in a space outside the spinal fluid sac. Even that approach poses risk when done poorly.

Arachnoiditis sufferer Steve Lovelace would like women to consider that pain relief during childbirth might not be worth risking a lifetime of suffering. “I know so many women who have children and are in so much pain during what should be the most joyful part of their life,” he said.

Lovelace’s agony started with a freak tree-cutting accident in 1982 on an Oklahoma family farm. His 20-year-old torso was crushed, causing debilitating injuries that required multiple surgeries. 

Now 63 and medically retired from a radiology career, the pioneering para-triathlete has teamed up with Lewis to create the YouTube podcast Arachnoiditis Unfiltered. Given what they endure, they are remarkably chipper co-hosts. Their goals: awareness, prevention and a cure.

Lori Verton aims for those goals, too. Verton lives near Ontario, Canada. In 1999, she was driving out into the dark on a mission to buy milk for her kids. She was injured when her car hit a deer. When her whiplash symptoms didn’t improve, her doctor ordered a spinal tap.

“While I was on the table, I felt my left thigh go numb, my left foot drop, I was incontinent. I knew immediately something was wrong,” she recalled. “They said, ‘We’ve bruised some nerves, it will heal.’”

Heal it did not. She was increasingly disabled by pain and estimates it took five years and a dozen doctors to diagnose arachnoiditis. Largely bedridden at age 42, she went on disability. Having worked as a physiologist and medical researcher, Verton pondered how to put her skills to use. That led to the creation of the Arachnoiditis and Chronic Meningitis Collaborative Research Network.

‘No One Knew Anything About It’

Forrest Tennant, a retired physician, is widely associated with arachnoiditis. The disease is the focus of his small foundation and Arachnoiditis Hope website. 

I watched a video in which Dr. Tennant said one hallmark of arachnoiditis patients is they are always moving. I thought: Ah, he knows us. With pain focused on lower backs, buttocks and legs, many arachnoiditis patients can’t sit comfortably. Nor, if they can stand, can they stay in one spot for long. Some can barely sleep.

I asked Dr. Tennant what spurred his interest in the disease. He said it was the number of people with the same symptoms who were coming into his pain clinic, and the high suicide rate among them. 

“I found out no one was interested in the disease, no one knew anything about it. Patients were so grateful for any help they could get,” he told me.

Dr. Tennant said doctors from around the world contact him, seeking treatment advice. I don’t doubt it. I’ve read journal articles written by doctors from Poland, Brazil and China, scouring the medical literature for anything they can find on the subject. The authors of a recent case study described the literature on the disease as “vague and outdated.”

Dr. Tennant doesn’t dispute the value of injections for spinal pain, but said they can set people up for trouble, especially if they are repeated. He’s seen patients who had as many as 20 epidurals. 

When we talked, I added up my own spinal intrusions. The first was a Caesarean. My preemie baby was arriving upside down and backward, so there seemed no alternative to spinal anesthesia there. 

The second instance was a steroid injection aimed at reducing chronic pain that arose after hip replacement. It was a Hail Mary treatment that didn’t help. 

Finally, in 2024, I had that single-level lumbar fusion. Four doctors had predicted dire health consequences if I didn’t get my spine reinforced. One physician confirmed my arachnoiditis diagnosis. As that surgeon was leaving the exam room he turned and said, “What would bother me is not knowing.” 

In other words, not knowing why I developed arachnoiditis after my back surgery. Most patients don’t.

More Can Be Done

There’s a crying need for research into the causes of arachnoiditis. I find it hard to muster hope for significant advancement in the U.S., where federal health budgets have been slashed. 

Still, there’s much that could be done to prevent and identify the disease. Medical schools could call attention to arachnoiditis as a possible cause of pain. Patients could be asked routinely about their history of spinal injections and counseled on the risks of doing more. All radiologists could be trained to spot arachnoiditis. 

There could be a diagnostic code specific to the disease, making it easier to document and study. Spine surgeons, who know that arachnoiditis is consigning some patients to a lifetime of pain, could lead the charge to determine its cause.

Meanwhile, I’m depleted by stories like Matt’s. The 38-year-old Michigan man asked me not to share his last name, afraid that his disability could lead to job discrimination. 

On July 18, 2023 – he’ll never forget the date – Matt was given steroid injections on both sides of a bulging disk. His back pain immediately increased. Then it spread. Now, he said, “I pretty much avoid doing everything else I used to do in my life, because it hurts.”

As I cope with arachnoiditis, I ponder how to spread the word about it. Maybe this disease needs a simpler name. It definitely could use a champion – so far, no celebrity has joined forces with arachnoiditis patients. If only Spiderman would come to our rescue.

Julie Titone is a former newspaper journalist who also worked in academic and library communications. She is retired and lives in Everett, Washington. Julie’s website is julietitone.weebly.com.

This column first appeared in her Substack blog and is republished with permission. 

Weight Stigma Deters Women From Seeing Doctors

By Crystal Lindell

It’s been happening since I hit puberty, and it never stopped. At every doctor’s appointment I get hit with some version of the infamous question: “Have you thought about trying to lose some weight?”

Sometimes the tone is nice, most of the time it’s condescending.

And my answer is always the same. Yes, I have tried to lose weight.. Of course, I f***ing have. I’m not allowed to exist in our society without constantly thinking about trying to lose weight.

The doctors talk to me like I just woke up in this body yesterday. Like the only thing I needed to finally lose weight was a rude conversation with them.  

The snide comments, dismissive attitude, and annoyed tone as they read your weight aloud are enough to make you want to avoid the doctor all together.

And now a new study puts some data behind that experience.

A team led by researchers at the University of Minnesota found that weight-related stigma does deter women from seeking medical care.

For the study, which was recently published in Medical Research Archives, the researchers surveyed nearly 400 women. The team only studied women because they experience weight stigma more often than men.

They asked participants if they experienced any shaming triggers during medical visits and if there were ways doctors could use to avoid those triggers.

Unsurprisingly, they found women often delay care because of the stigma of being weighed. Nearly a third said they had refused to be weighed at a medical appointment.

Only one in seven (14.2%) reported having positive feelings in healthcare settings, while nearly two-thirds (65.1%) felt negative emotions, using words like “scary,” “embarrassed,” and “disrespected.”

"Stop treating women as if they did something wrong for being heavier,” one woman said.

"I see people discriminated against because of their weight," said another.

"I really appreciate when providers focus on health behaviors rather than just weight," another woman said. 

The study authors suggest that doctors consider when it’s medically necessary to weigh patients. Other simple ways to help ease patient discomfort about weight include:

  • Making it clear that being weighed is optional

  • Posting a sign above the scale that weight does not determine health

  • Not using BMI to determine whether someone is overweight.

  • Having furniture and equipment that accommodates all body sizes

“These factors are ones that healthcare systems and providers have direct control over and can remedy to improve healthcare experiences and health outcomes,” said co-author Elizabeth O'Neill, PhD, an associate professor of social work at Washburn University. “Weight-inclusive practices can make a meaningful difference in women’s healthcare satisfaction and utilization.”

The researchers hope their findings will be used to implement policy and procedure changes in healthcare to create an environment that is welcoming for all people, regardless of how much they weigh.

A Patient–Provider Playbook to Improve Diagnosis of Autoimmune Diseases

By Tara Bruner

Millions of people across the United States experience joint pain, fatigue, or stiffness. These symptoms are commonly associated with autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), which affect about 4.6% of the U.S. population. Diagnosing autoimmune conditions remains difficult, with studies indicating that up to 76% of patients receive at least one incorrect diagnosis before the underlying cause is identified.

Such delays in diagnosis can be frustrating and take a toll on both physical and mental health. Delays can also result in significant harm, as conditions like RA may cause irreversible joint damage if not treated promptly. However, advances in diagnostic technology and increased patient engagement are beginning to improve outcomes.

Why Rheumatic Diseases Are Hard to Diagnose

Rheumatic diseases include autoimmune and inflammatory disorders affecting the joints, muscles, tendons, and ligaments. Their early signs frequently resemble common health issues, such as the natural effects of aging, everyday stress, or minor aches and pains. This overlap often leads to the misdiagnosis of symptoms, complicating early detection. Autoimmune diseases don’t follow a script – and vague, shifting symptoms often defy simple explanations.

RA is also frequently confused with other conditions, including osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, and depression. Research shows that about 20% of patients diagnosed with RA initially receive an incorrect diagnosis. On average, the interval between symptom onset and accurate diagnosis spans about 12 months or longer.

Limited access to rheumatology specialists, particularly in rural or underserved areas, can further delay evaluation. Primary care providers may initially adopt a conservative approach to treatment, recommending rest or symptomatic treatment before pursuing advanced diagnostics. This inadvertently extends the diagnostic timeline.

Collectively, these factors result in many patients being undiagnosed or misdiagnosed for extended periods, during which ongoing inflammation may cause progressive and potentially irreversible joint damage.

The Role of Early Testing

Selecting the right diagnostic test at the right time is crucial to shortening the often lengthy and frustrating journey toward an accurate diagnosis. Fortunately, recent advances in testing have expanded the tools available to healthcare provider, but a timely diagnosis still hinges on informed, collaborative discussions between patients and providers.

A productive clinical visit begins with patients clearly sharing their symptom history. This includes when symptoms began, their frequency, severity, morning stiffness, flare-up patterns, and any noticeable changes over time.

This firsthand context from patients helps providers determine which tests are most appropriate, such as those for rheumatoid factor (RF); anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies; and Inflammatory markers like C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR).

Tests such as Thermo Fisher’s EliA™ autoimmunity assays provide clinicians with extra insight to support more precise diagnoses and can help tailor treatment recommendations. The assays monitor a wide range of autoimmune diseases by detecting and measuring antibodies in a patient's blood. These tests can aid in the diagnosis of conditions like RA, celiac disease, and thyroid disorders.

Providers should explain to patients what each test measures, what the results might indicate, and how those results will shape the treatment plan. Patients should be encouraged to ask questions about the purpose and limitations of testing, as well as next steps – whether that’s additional tests, follow-up appointments, or referrals to specialists like rheumatologists.

Because autoimmune diseases often present with vague or overlapping symptoms, test results alone may not be definitive. That’s why providers rely heavily on patient-reported symptom changes, triggers, and how those symptoms affect everyday life --- general insights that can help uncover patterns lab results might miss.

It’s important to note that even when test results rule out certain conditions, that information is still considered valuable. It narrows the diagnostic focus and helps maintain momentum toward finding answers. When there are cases of uncertainty or slow progress, seeking a second opinion is reasonable and sometimes essential.

Ultimately, effective diagnosis is a joint effort: patients contribute lived experience, while providers bring clinical expertise. This shared decision-making builds trust, accelerates diagnosis, and leads to earlier, more targeted treatment, which improves both short- and long-term outcomes.

Women Face Greater Diagnostic Delays

RA disproportionately affects women, who constitute nearly 80% of all cases. Despite this high prevalence, women are significantly more likely to be misdiagnosed or experience delays in receiving appropriate care. In fact, a study examining healthcare misdiagnoses  found that approximately two-thirds of those who reported being misdiagnosed were women, highlighting a systemic issue of diagnostic disparities.

The typical symptoms of fatigue, joint pain, and general discomfort are frequently dismissed in women or attributed to stress or hormonal changes, rather than recognized as signs of an underlying autoimmune condition. Hormonal fluctuations, particularly during childbearing years, can mask or mimic autoimmune symptoms, making timely diagnosis even more challenging.

These diagnostic delays can lead to serious consequences for women, including permanent joint damage, decreased mobility, and long-term physical impairment. Emotional distress caused by being dismissed or misunderstood exacerbates the overall disease burden and negatively impacts quality of life. Delays often result in the need for more intensive and costly treatments.

Recognizing and validating unexplained symptoms in women is crucial for a timely diagnosis and appropriate intervention, ultimately improving outcomes.

Advocating for Patients as Partners in Diagnosis

An accurate diagnosis doesn’t happen through testing alone. It requires patients to speak up, track patterns, push for clarity, and challenge delays.

Patients are not passive participants in their care. They are the key to faster, more accurate diagnoses. By documenting symptoms, asking hard questions, and refusing to accept vague answers, patients can help uncover critical insights that standard labs don’t reveal.

What changes outcomes is a patient who actively engages, and a provider who listens to them without bias or assumptions. Together, they form a partnership that prioritizes answers over assumptions and action over wait-and-see.

Clear communication, persistent advocacy, and a refusal to be dismissed – these are not optional. They are the foundation of faster diagnoses and better care.

The process to achieve faster autoimmune diagnosis requires patients to receive proactive primary care tests and to maintain open dialogue with their doctors.

The patient's personal understanding of their medical experience should receive equal recognition as well. The active involvement of patients, combined with advanced diagnostics, will enhances rheumatic disease treatment and produce superior long-term results.

Tara Bruner is a Physician Associate and Manager of Clinical Education for Thermo Fisher Scientific.

Rx Opioids Are Not a Cure… and Neither Is Anything Else

By Neen Monty

They deliver it like it’s some kind of mic drop.

“Opioids are not a cure,” they say.

But here’s the important thing: Almost nothing in medicine is a cure.

Insulin doesn’t cure diabetes. But it keeps people alive.

Methotrexate and Xeljanz don’t cure rheumatoid arthritis. They slow down disease progression though.

Intravenous immunoglobulin is not a cure for Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy. But it slows down the demyelination of my nerves.

Prednisone is not a cure for autoimmune disease. But it reduces inflammation, which improves pain and quality of life.

Anti-inflammatories do not cure inflammatory arthritis, but they decrease pain, increase function and improve quality of life.

Metformin, thyroxine, even chemotherapy in many cases… none are cures.

They manage symptoms, reduce harm, and improve quality of life.

That’s medicine’s job.

Medicine is not purely about curing disease. In fact, it’s rarely about curing disease. That does not mean that all the wonderful things that medicine can do are worthless.

So why is pain relief held to a higher standard than every other kind of treatment?

Why are opioids dismissed simply because they don’t cure the underlying disease that causes the pain?

Pain relief is not a moral failing. It’s medicine doing what it’s meant to do: Alleviate suffering and restore function.

That’s what opioids do. Alleviate suffering, restore function and improve quality of life. Those are good things.

If you can move again, sleep again, think clearly again, participate in life again, isn’t that a good thing?

But no. Dismiss opioids because they’re not a cure.

Such a stupid point of view.

Now that we’ve shown that chronic pain patients hardly ever become addicted or overdose on their pain medication, people are really reaching for reasons to demonize opioids. Saying that opioids are not a cure is reaching pretty hard.

Opioids reduce pain temporarily. I am under no illusions. And I do wish there was a cure for my diseases. I really do. But there is no cure. There is only palliative treatment -- with opioids.

And so many people would like to take that pain relief away from me. People who have never experienced severe pain at 1am. So severe that sleep is impossible. So constant that it happens every night. And all day, every day.

Except for the few hours when I have pain medication to reduce that pain – while not curing it.

Opioids don’t cure pain any more than insulin cures diabetes. They treat a symptom. A devastating symptom – severe pain - that profoundly affects function and quality of life.

Reducing that pain, even temporarily, is not a failure.

That’s a treatment working.

It’s the best treatment we’ve got for severe pain, acute or chronic.

To say “opioids are not a cure” is to fundamentally misunderstand what they’re for.

You know, those glasses you wear won’t cure your shortsightedness. Let’s take your glasses away. They’re not a cure!

That wheelchair won’t cure paralysis. You don’t need a wheelchair.

We don’t apply this logic to any other condition or treatment. Only pain. Only opioids.

We don’t tell people with heart failure to throw away their meds because they don’t “fix” the heart.

We don’t tell people with asthma to stop their inhalers because they don’t “cure” the lungs.

We treat to relieve symptoms, to restore life and dignity, because that’s the ethical duty of medicine.

Relief of suffering is an outcome. Improved function is an outcome. But a cure is wishful thinking.

So the next time someone says, “Opioids are not a cure,” remember that neither is anything else we use to keep people alive, moving, and human.

And that’s okay. Because that’s the best we can do, in many situations.

Because the goal of medicine isn’t always to cure. It’s to care.

Neen Monty is a patient advocate in Australia who lives with rheumatoid arthritis and Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP), a progressive neurological disease that attacks the nerves.

Neen is dedicated to challenging misinformation and promoting access to safe, effective pain relief. She has created a website for Pain Patient Advocacy Australia to show that prescription opioids can be safe and effective, even when taken long term. You can subscribe to Neen’s free newsletter on Substack, “Arthritic Chick on Chronic Pain.”

Cutting Off SNAP Benefits Will Hurt People With Chronic Pain

By Crystal Lindell

The only thing worse than chronic pain is chronic pain with hunger. 

But that’s exactly the situation we are about to plunge millions of Americans into if SNAP benefits don’t go out in November. 

The food stamp program — more formally called the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) — provides money for groceries to those with a low income. And it looks to be one of the many casualties of the current federal government shutdown. 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture confirmed this week that they will not use emergency funds to cover November disbursements. So unless the government reopens or the Trump administration changes its mind, about 42 million low-income people won’t have enough money to buy all the food they need. 

And make no mistake, cutting off SNAP benefits in November will hurt people with chronic pain. While most people might not connect food aid with chronic pain, there is a significant overlap.

According to the CDC, over half of disabled Americans (52.4%) have chronic pain, while the most recent USDA data show that nearly four in five (79%) SNAP households includes a child or adult with a disability. Those households receive 83% of SNAP benefits.

But the statistics don’t tell the full story. There are many people who are in too much pain to work full-time jobs that would pay enough to cover their household expenses — yet they are not disabled enough to qualify as fully “disabled” by government standards.

Those people often rely on government programs like SNAP to make ends meet. 

There are a lot of people who think that too many people get SNAP, and that cutting off benefits or adopting tougher work requirements will cause a needed reset. 

But my experience is that not enough people get SNAP. In fact, I would support expanding the program to help as many “disabled but not technically disabled” people as possible. 

The number one thing I hear people say when they complain about programs like SNAP is essentially: “It’s not fair. I need it and don’t get it. Therefore fewer people should get it.”

But in reality, the conclusion should be the opposite. If you need a government aid program and can’t get it, the solution should be to expand access to that program – not to cut the program off for others. 

The average SNAP recipient gets $177 per month in food aid. Would you be able to buy enough food to survive on less than $6 a day?

I also worry that if SNAP benefits end next month, they might not ever go out again. Once you upend a social program, it’s easy to continue on that path. 

I believe it’s a sign of our deep cultural rot that cutting off SNAP is even a possibility. It’s telling that an anonymous donor volunteered to give the government $130 million dollars to fund military pay during the shutdown, but no such donor has appeared to contribute to SNAP aid. 

Our priorities have skewed so far in the wrong direction, that we now spend billions on the military to protect citizens we can’t even feed. What is even the point of that?

My hope is that society will prove me wrong – and that the moral rot I fear is still fresh enough to be hacked off. Push back from voters and advocacy groups could pressure the government to find a way to go forward with the November SNAP disbursement. 

Only time will tell whether America still values feeding people as much as it claims to want to protect them. 

Government Shutdown Highlights Absurd Cost of Health Insurance

By Crystal Lindell

Health insurance has gotten so expensive that it almost makes sense to ask, “Is it worth the price?”

Insurance is sold to consumers through a “worst-case scenario” framework. Companies tell people they have to have health insurance or risk disaster.

“What if you suddenly need millions of dollars in ICU care? You need to have our health insurance to pay that bill!” is how they frame it.

Naturally, the insurance companies follow that up with, “If we are saving you millions of dollars in medical expenses, then tens of thousands of dollars for your policy is actually quite a bargain, right?”

“Tens of thousands of dollars” might seem like an exaggeration if you haven’t been paying close attention to health insurance prices lately, but it’s not.

According to data recently released by KFF, a health policy nonprofit, family premiums for employer-sponsored health insurance reached an average of $26,993 this year.

Their data shows that workers pay $6,850 of that out of their own paychecks. As such, that’s the price most people associate with their plans.

But in reality, employees are paying the full $26,993, because every penny that companies spend on your health insurance is a penny that could be in your paycheck instead. Hiding those costs behind “employer contributions” is just a neat trick insurance companies use to hide the real price you’re paying.

And if you’re buying insurance on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace, then the real cost of your plan is hidden in a different way: behind federal subsidies. Some of those subsidies will expire at the end of the year, and it’s forcing people to confront just how expensive insurance has gotten. 

The ACA subsidies are at the heart of why our federal government is currently shut down. Democrats want them to continue, and Republicans do not.

The potentially devastating effects of ending them for the 24 million people currently enrolled through the ACA are becoming apparent. Open enrollment for 2026 coverage begins Nov.1, and people have to make their decisions soon.

The Washington State Standard reports that individual insurance in that state bought through the ACA are set to rise an average of 21% next year. 

As of now, the subsidies save ACA enrollees an average of $1,330 per year, according to Washington Gov. Bob Ferguson’s office. For seniors, those savings jump to more than $1,900 annually.

Going Without Coverage

NBC News reports that some people are planning to forego health insurance, rather than pay higher prices. They shared the story of Arkansas residents Ginny Murray and her husband, Chaz. The couple plans to drop coverage and pay out of their own pocket if an unexpected illness strikes.

“Our plan is to keep putting the money we’re already paying towards health care in savings,” Ginny explained. “And really just hoping that we don’t have a stroke or we don’t have a heart attack.”

It’s a plan I myself adopted years ago after getting laid off and deciding to make a go of it as a freelancer who does odds and ends on the side to survive. When I tried to look into health insurance plans, I quickly realized that it was much cheaper to just pay cash out of pocket for my doctor appointments and prescriptions.

Especially since even if I pay for insurance, deductibles and co-pays mean I could still end up with thousands of dollars of medical debt. 

Yes, I live under the constant fear that I will be one of the people that health insurance companies warn about. That someday I will find myself in the ICU in need of millions of dollars of care that I can’t pay for.

But it’s a risk I have to take at this stage of my life because I just cannot afford to buy my own health insurance, even with the ACA subsidies. 

Last I checked, I did not qualify for Medicaid, although that too brings its own set of problems. Currently my primary care doctor is across the state line at the closest university hospital to my house. He’s well equipped to handle the chronic, complex health problems that I face But if I got onto Medicaid in my state, I may not be able to see him anymore.

Mine is just one story among millions who are trying to figure out how to pay for their health care under a private health insurance system where companies have every incentive to raise prices to eternal heights.

That’s why, in reality, we should be striving for more than just some ACA subsidies for health insurance. Medical expenses and health insurance costs should not constantly loom over people’s heads. 

We could be implementing universal Medicare at the very least. A program like Medicare for All would be life changing for me. I’m sick, but not sick enough for disability. And since I am only 42, I can’t get Medicare yet.

It doesn’t have to be that way. What if I could get the same health insurance my grandma has? Why do I have to wait until I’m 65 to do that? Why is 65 the arbitrary number?

Other developed countries have better alternatives, such as universal healthcare coverage, than the current U.S. system. We should have better access to health insurance too – or at least something more affordable.

Does Having Chronic Pain Mean I’ll Die Young?

By Crystal Lindell

This morning I got news that someone I knew had passed away.

I describe him as “someone I knew” because my connection to Rich is difficult to explain. He was my fiancé’s, late-mom’s, long-time boyfriend. Basically, my step-father-in-law. Ish.

After battling a bad cold, which may or may not have been COVID, he had an aneurysm and then spent a couple weeks in the ICU before passing away last night.

It’s the kind of news that’s both expected and painfully shocking.

He was too young. Just 58 years old. But his short life had been hard on him and his body. He had spent years doing manual labor and treating his pain with multiple types of medications. 

So, in retrospect, if you had asked me for a prediction, I would have told you that I never expected Rich to live to see old age.

But I didn’t really expect him to die at 58 either.

Since 2020, nine people I knew have died. Two long-time friends, my cousin, my dad, my aunt, my step-dad, my fiancé’s mom, my former boss, and now, Rich.

My fiancé Chris and I got engaged in December 2020 and he’s still my “fiancé” in large part because the onslaught of death seemed to freeze my brain in such a way that made it impossible to plan a wedding.

And now, a quarter of our would-be guest list is dead.

Many of the dead were very young. My age. All of them were too young. None of them made it to their 70s.

I can’t help but consider my own mortality. And it’s made me realize something I had been trying to avoid: People who develop severe chronic pain at 29, like I did, often don’t live long enough to be considered old. And when they do, they are the exception to the rule.

Even if the pain itself isn’t terminal, everything else will surely have an easier time taking me out. It’s not like I’m in peak disease-fighting shape. 

Not to mention all the damage that taking pills for breakfast every morning must be doing to my organs.  

The thing about the kind of nebulous chronic pain that I have is that I never got to have one of those movie-scene conversations in a doctor’s office where they clearly explain how dire my situation is. I suspect those conversations are reserved for illnesses that show up on blood work and CT Scans.

My pain has always been something only I could feel, and nobody else could see or test.

As such, my doctors have always been some mix of hopeful and dismissive about my ailment. They’d tell me that maybe I’d magically get better one day, while also telling me that they couldn’t find anything wrong with my ribs. 

And none of them have ever spoken directly to me about the many ways that chronic pain and my eventual diagnosis with Ehler-Danlos Syndrome might shorten my life expectancy. Technically, neither one is supposed to on its own. 

That doesn’t mean they can’t though. And I suspect the doctors know this, given the fact that they are willing to prescribe me the kind of opioid regime most people don’t ever go off of.

These days, I’m known among my loved ones as having “a lot of health issues,” while among my acquaintances I’m known as “the one who writes about her chronic pain online.”

So someday, when they all get the news of my death, I’m sure none of them will be too shocked. People aren’t surprised when someone like me, with a rare disease that causes chronic pain, dies young. They’re surprised when we don’t.

There was a time, in my early days with chronic pain, when I prayed for death. A time when I could not imagine spending years of my life with stabbing rib pain.

But over the years I came to accept it, and learned to manage it as much as medication would allow.

I’m 42 now, and a few years ago I started letting my gray roots grow out. 

After being surrounded by so much death, I saw them now as my silver trophy. My prize for making it to my 40s — a privilege that some of my late friends never got to experience.

How lucky am I to have lived long enough to have gray hair?

How lucky am I to be old enough for wrinkles? To have reached the age where I’m now slowly losing my ability to read small print? To be alive to complain about how hard it is to stand up, now that my body is aging.

How fortunate am I? How fantastic for me.

I can only hope that I make it much, much longer. Maybe another 42 years, if I’m truly lucky. But if not, I have faced my own mortality. I can see clearly just how fragile it is. And I’m okay with that.

I will spend my days baking, caring for loved ones, and writing. I will focus on all the things I would be focused on if I had ever gotten to have one of those somber doctor office conversations about my health. All the things that everyone realizes truly matter in life — right when they are about to run out of life themselves.

So even if I’m not OK, I will be OK.

Where Pain Research Is Headed and Why I’m Hopeful

By Dr. Lynn Webster

If you live with pain, you’ve probably heard promises that “something better is coming.” At this month’s Pain Therapeutics Summit in San Diego, you could see that promise taking shape. For two days, clinicians, scientists, companies and advocates compared notes on what’s working, what’s not, and what’s next.

Threaded through much of it was the National Institutes of Health’s Helping to End Addiction Long-Term (HEAL) Initiative -- an NIH-wide push launched in 2018 to accelerate better pain care and reduce opioid-related harms.

HEAL exists because of the opioid crisis; Congress gave NIH an initial $500 million in fiscal year 2018 to jump-start a coordinated research plan, and the NIH has since invested several billion dollars to keep the effort moving. In other words, HEAL is a rare silver lining: a tragedy spurring a sustained, practical response.

(The HEAL Initiative was not directly hit by any funding cuts in 2025. However, the Trump administration has proposed cutting the NIH budget by 40% next year, which could potentially impact HEAL funding.)

Since its launch, HEAL has grown into a national engine for discovery. NIH reports a cumulative investment approaching $4 billion, supporting more than 2,000 projects across all 50 states, and helping advance 40-plus new drugs and devices to FDA investigational status.

This is a sign that the pipeline is broader and closer to patients than it has been in years. Think of HEAL as scaffolding: trial networks, shared data standards, and coordinated teams that help good ideas climb faster from lab to bedside.

A decade ago, analgesic research often looked like isolated bets. Today, it feels more like a coordinated campaign. That doesn’t guarantee success, but it raises the odds that something useful will reach doctors and patients.

Just as important, what’s coming isn’t a single “miracle drug” but a wider toolkit. You’ll see more non-opioid medicines designed around the biology of different pain types; safer use of existing tools that can lower the need for higher doses when opioids are used; devices and neuromodulation approaches that calm overactive nerves or brain circuits; smarter drug delivery systems that make treatments last longer or act locally at lower doses; and digital health that captures how people actually live -- including their sleep, activity, and pain flares -- so that care decisions track real life, not just clinic visits.

The studies themselves are changing, too. Many people don’t have just one pain condition; they have overlapping problems. Newer trials are beginning to mirror that reality and to focus on outcomes you can actually experience -- walking farther, sleeping better, and participating more in life -- rather than only chasing a number on a pain scale.

Researchers are also building better signposts, such as biomarkers and other objective measures, to predict who will benefit from which therapy and who may be at risk of long-term pain after injury or surgery.

Signposts aren’t a substitute for what people tell us about their pain. In research and development, objective measures help compare treatments and identify who is most likely to benefit. Once a therapy reaches the clinic, those measures become guides, not verdicts, and should be read alongside the patient’s narrative so that care reflects how the person actually lives and feels.

HEAL has made these shifts a priority by funding large, practical datasets and endpoints that regulators and payers can use.

Here’s the clear-eyed part: many of the drugs and devices discussed at meetings like this will not make it past the investigational stage. That’s how science works. But when trials are well designed and data are shared, today’s misses can more quickly lead to tomorrow’s wins -- and the lessons won’t vanish into a file drawer.

Some analgesic candidates will cross the finish line, and even modest gains -- better sleep, fewer flares, less brain fog, or an extra hour of activity -- can change a life. Across millions of people, small wins add up to something transformative.

What does this mean if you’re living with pain right now? Expect more choices and more personalization. Conversations with your clinician may start to include options that didn’t exist a few years ago, and you may hear about clinical studies built around everyday life rather than rigid clinic schedules. If a trial is a good fit, participating in one will help move the field forward.

Most of all, there’s a reason for hope that is grounded in real progress, not hype.

None of this happened by accident. The NIH HEAL Initiative has been the engine behind much of it -- steady funding, coordination, and a focus on solutions that reach the bedside. Keeping that engine running is how promising ideas become practical relief.

Lynn R. Webster, MD, is a pain and addiction medicine specialist and serves as Executive Vice President of Scientific Affairs at Dr. Vince Clinical Research, where he consults with pharmaceutical companies.

Dr. Webster is the author of the forthcoming book, “Deconstructing Toxic Narratives -- Data, Disparities, and a New Path Forward in the Opioid Crisis,” to be published by Springer Nature. Dr. Webster is not a member of any political or religious organization.

5 Ways to Support a Loved One With Chronic Pain

By Crystal Lindell

Recently I wrote that one of the most important things you need to enjoy life with chronic pain is supportive loved ones.

But what does that look like in practice?

Below are some tips on how to realistically help loved ones who deal with chronic pain.

And if you’re the person in pain reading this, perhaps you can pass this on to your friends, family and other loved ones. Afterall, sometimes getting advice from a third party can help it land better.

Also, of course, if you have your own tips to share, we’d love to read them in the comments!

1. Keep in Touch With Them

If you care about someone with pain, maybe the most important thing you can do is to just stay in contact with them.

Having chronic pain makes it difficult to attend in-person events, but that doesn’t mean we lose the need for human connection. In fact, it just makes that need much stronger.

Sometimes friends fall off because they don’t see you as often, but other times it’s because they don’t want to have to talk to someone with chronic health issues. Those conversations can force them to face the fact that their own body is also fragile and mortal.

But if you actually care about someone, I encourage you to push past all that.

Texting and phone calls can be a lifeline for people with chronic pain — as can in-person visits.

Your interactions with them may be the majority of human interaction they have, and it can be enough to keep them going for another day.

2. Give Them Meals and Help with Chores

When I first started having chronic pain, one of my friends did one of the nicest things anyone has ever done for me – either before or since. She drove 2 hours to come visit me and then cleaned my entire apartment, including the bathroom.

It is not possible to express how grateful I was and how much of a difference that made in my ability to keep going through one of the darkest times in my life. Just having a clean space to exist was like having a weight lifted off my very painful ribs.

While healthy people can take for granted the ability to do daily household tasks like cooking meals and doing the dishes — a person with chronic pain knows how easy it is to fall behind on those things.

And when that happens, on top of the stress of dealing with a broken body, you also have to deal with a messy house. That can come with a lot of guilt and even physical discomfort.  

So, if you’re able to help them with housework in any capacity, that can also lift a truly heavy burden.

Having someone make or drop off meals once a week, or even once a month can also be a massive help. There’s also the option of sending meals with services like DoorDash or Uber Eats, or giving them food delivery gift cards.

It may seem like cooking and cleaning for someone is no big deal, but when you do it for someone with chronic pain, it can be as helpful as the best medication.

3. Don’t Be Offended If Someone Needs Rest

I need more sleep than the average person, I assume because my body is using so much energy to just exist with chronic pain. I also need more time to recover after big events like parties.

It can mean that I can’t respond to calls or text, and that I need a lot of time alone to sleep and rest.

But even my most well-meaning loved ones can take this need for rest as some sort of indictment — as though I just don’t want to be around them or to interact with them.

It’s not about them though, it’s about me and my defective body.

If someone you love has chronic pain and they need a nap, or a couple days to respond to a text, don’t take it personally. It probably just means they needed some extra rest.

4. Go to Doctor’s Appointments With Them

Chronic pain can make it more important than ever to have productive doctor appointments — but it can also make that task more difficult.

That’s why having a loved one attending doctor’s appointments with you is truly invaluable.

A second person being there to focus on what the doctor is saying and to ask questions on your behalf can mean the difference between finding treatments that actually work or not.

It also usually makes doctors take a patient more seriously when they know that a loved one is keeping tabs and will be holding them to account for their treatment outcomes.

So, if you’re able to go to doctor appointments with your loved one with chronic pain, I highly recommend doing so.  

5.  Be Accepting of their Use of Pain Medications

A lot of people face stigma for using pain medications, especially opioids.

But oftentimes, pain medication can become a point of friction between patients and loved ones, who don’t fully understand the importance of alleviating chronic pain.

Other people’s pain is always easy to endure, so it’s always easy to tell someone else that they don’t need to treat their pain.

While loved ones who say such things are usually well-meaning, those conversations can cause a lot of unnecessary stress for people in pain.

It’s best just to assume that if someone is using pain medication, then they need that pain medication.  

In the end, the best advice for supporting a loved one with chronic pain is to treat them how they want to be treated. And to accept that whatever they are going through is at least as bad as they are describing.

When you approach help from that mindset, you’ll often naturally find the best ways to support them.

Having support from loved ones can mean the difference between being able to endure a life with chronic pain or not. It’s just as important for their health as a good doctor is, and it can have just as much impact. 

It’s a Bird! It’s a Plane! It’s a Chemtrail? New Conspiracy Theory Takes Wing at HHS

By Stephanie Armour

While plowing a wheat field in rural Washington state in the 1990s, William Wallace spotted a gray plane overhead that he believed was releasing chemicals to make him sick. The rancher began to suspect that all white vapor trails from aircraft might be dangerous.

He shared his concern with reporters, acknowledging it sounded a little like “The X Files,” a science fiction television show.

Academics cite Wallace’s story as one of the catalysts behind a fringe concept that has spread among adherents to the Make America Healthy Again, or MAHA, movement and is gaining traction at the highest levels of the federal government. Its treatment as a serious issue underscores that under President Donald Trump, unscientific ideas have unusual power to take hold and shape public health policy.

The concept posits that airplane vapor trails, or contrails, are really “chemtrails” containing toxic substances that poison people and the terrain. Another version alleges planes or devices are being deployed by the federal government, private companies, or researchers to trigger big weather changes, such as hurricanes, or to alter the Earth’s climate, emitting hazardous chemicals in the process.

Several GOP lawmakers and leaders in the Trump administration remain convinced the concepts are legitimate, though scientists have sought to discredit such claims.

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is planning to investigate climate and weather control, and is expected to create a task force that will recommend possible federal action, according to a former agency official, an internal agency memo obtained by KFF Health News, and a consultant who helped with the memo.

The plans, along with comments by top GOP lawmakers, show how rumors and conspiracy theories can gain an air of legitimacy due to social media and a political climate infused with falsehoods, some political scientists and researchers say.

“When we have low access to information or low trust in our sources of information, a lot of times we turn to our peer groups, the groups we are members of and we define ourselves by,” said Timothy Tangherlini, a folklorist and professor of information at the University of California-Berkeley. He added that the government’s investigation of conspiracy theories “gives the impression of having some authoritative element.”

HHS is expected to appoint a special government employee to investigate climate and weather control, according to Gray Delany, former head of the agency’s MAHA agenda, who said he drafted the memo. The agency has interviewed applicants to lead a “chemtrails” task force, said Jim Lee, a blogger focused on weather and climate who Delany said helped edit the memo, which Lee confirmed.

“HHS does not comment on future or potential policy decisions and task forces,” agency spokesperson Emily Hilliard said in an email.

The memo alleges that “aerosolized heavy metals such as Aluminum, Barium, and Strontium, as well as other materials such as sulfuric acid precursors, are sprayed into the atmosphere under the auspices of combatting global warming,” through a process of stratospheric aerosol injection, or SAI.

“There are serious concerns SAI spraying is leading to increased heavy metal content in the atmosphere,” the memo states.

The memo claims, without providing evidence, that the substances cause elevated heavy-metal content in the atmosphere, soil, and waterways, and that aluminum is a toxic product used in SAI linked to dementia, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, asthma-like illnesses, and other chronic illnesses. The July 14 memo was addressed to White House health adviser Calley Means, who didn’t respond to a voicemail left by a reporter seeking comment.

High-level federal government officials are presenting false claims as facts without evidence and referring to events that not only haven’t occurred but, in many cases, are physically impossible, said Daniel Swain, a climate scientist at the University of California.

“That is a pretty shocking memo,” he said. “It doesn’t get more tinfoil hat. They really believe toxins are being sprayed.”

Kennedy has previously promoted debunked chemtrail theories. In May, he was asked on “Dr. Phil Primetime” about chemicals being sprayed into the stratosphere to change the Earth’s climate.

“It’s done, we think, by DARPA,” Kennedy said, referring to a Department of Defense agency that develops emerging technology for the military’s use. “And a lot of it now is coming out of the jet fuel. Those materials are put in jet fuel. I’m going to do everything in my power to stop it. We’re bringing on somebody who’s going to think only about that.”

DARPA officials didn’t return a message seeking comment.

‘This Really Matters to MAHA’

Deploying chemtrails to poison people is just one of many baseless conspiracy theories that have found traction among Trump administration health policy officials led by Kennedy, a longtime anti-vaccine activist before entering politics. He continues to promote a supposed link between vaccines and autism, as well as make statements connecting fluoride in drinking water to arthritis, bone fractures, thyroid disease, and cancer. The World Health Organization says fluoride is safe when used as recommended.

Delany, who was ousted in August from HHS, said Kennedy has expressed strong interest in chemtrails.

“This is an issue that really matters to MAHA,” said Delany, referring to the informal movement associated with Kennedy that is composed of people who are skeptical of evidence-based medicine.

The memo also alleges that “suspicious weather events have been occurring and have increased awareness of the issue to the public, some of which have been acknowledged to have been caused by geoengineering activities, such as the flooding in Dubai in 2024.” Geoengineering refers to intentional large-scale efforts to change the climate to counteract global warming.

“It is unconscionable that anyone should be allowed to spray known neurotoxins and environmental toxins over our nation’s citizens, their land, food and water supplies,” Delany’s memo states.

Scientists, meteorologists, and other branches of the federal government say these assertions are largely incorrect. Some points in the memo are accurate, including concerns that commercial aircraft contribute to acid rain.

I expected there were documents like this, but seeing it in print is nevertheless shocking. Our government is being driven by nonsensical dreck from dark corners of social media.
— David Keith, PhD, University of Chicago.

But critics say the memo builds on kernels of truth before veering into unscientific fringe theories. Efforts to control the weather are being made, largely by states and local governments seeking to combat droughts, but the results are modest and highly localized. It isn’t possible to manipulate large-scale weather events, scientists say.

Severe flooding in the United Arab Emirates in 2024 couldn’t have been caused by weather manipulation because no technology could create that kind of rainfall event, Maarten Ambaum, a meteorologist at the University of Reading who studies Gulf region rainfall patterns, said in a statement on the floods. Similar debunked claims emerged this year after central Texas experienced devastating floods.

The Government Accountability Office concluded in a 2024 report that questions remain as to the effectiveness of weather modification.

Research into changing the climate has been conducted, including work by one private company that engaged in field tests. Still, federal agencies say no ongoing or large-scale projects are underway. Study of the concept remains in the research phase. The Environmental Protection Agency says there are no large-scale or government efforts to affect the Earth’s climate.

“Solar geoengineering is not occurring via direct delivery by commercial aircraft and is not associated with aviation contrails,” the agency says on its website.

Widespread Misinformation

Misperceptions about weather, climate control, and airplane contrails extend beyond the Trump administration, scientists said.

In September, a congressional House committee hearing titled “Playing God With the Weather — A Disastrous Forecast” involved two hours of debate on the once-fringe idea. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), who chaired the hearing, has introduced legislation to ban weather and climate control, with a fine of up to $100,000 and up to five years in prison.

Some Democrats objected to the nature of the discussion. Rep. Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.) accused Greene of using “the platform of Congress to proffer anti-science theories, to platform climate denialism.”

Frequently citing chemtrails, GOP lawmakers have introduced legislation in about two dozen states to ban weather modification or geoengineering. Florida passed a bill to establish an online portal so residents can report alleged violations.

“The Free State of Florida means freedom from governments or private actors unilaterally applying chemicals or geoengineering to people or public spaces,” GOP Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis said in a press statement this spring.

Meanwhile, the chemtrail conspiracy has permeated popular culture. The title track on singer Lana Del Ray’s seventh studio album is entitled “Chemtrails Over the Country Club.” Bill Maher dove into the chemtrail myth on his podcast “Club Random,” saying, “This is nuts. It’s just nuts.” And “Chemtrails,” a psychological thriller, wrapped filming in July.

Social media has given wing to the chemtrails concept and other fringe ideas involving public health. They include an outlandish belief that Anthony Fauci, who advised both Trump and President Joe Biden on the government response to the covid-19 pandemic, created the AIDS epidemic. There is no evidence of such a link, public health leaders say.

Researchers say another false belief by those on the far right holds that people who received covid vaccines could shed the virus, causing infertility in the unvaccinated. There is no evidence of such a connection, scientists and researchers say.

More severe weather events due to global warming may be driving some of the baseless theories, scientists say. And risks occur when such ideas take hold among the general population or policymakers, some public health leaders say. Climate researchers, including Swain, say they’ve received death threats.

Lee, the blogger, said he disagrees with some of the more far-fetched beliefs and is aware of the harm they can cause.

“There are people wanting to shoot down planes because they think they are chemtrails,” said Lee, adding that some believers are afraid to venture outside when plane vapor trails are visible overhead.

There is also no evidence that plane contrails cause health problems or are related to intentional efforts to control the climate, according to the EPA and other scientists.

The memo and focus at HHS on climate and weather control are alarming because they perpetuate conspiracies, said David Keith, a professor of geophysical sciences at the University of Chicago.

“It’s unmoored to reality,” he said. “I expected there were documents like this, but seeing it in print is nevertheless shocking. Our government is being driven by nonsensical dreck from dark corners of social media.”

KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues.

3 Things You Need to Enjoy Life, Even With Chronic Pain

By Crystal Lindell

If you want to enjoy life again while also living with chronic pain, you need just three things.

1. An effective pain medication.
2. The ability to pace your activity level
3. Supportive loved ones

If you have all three of those things, it’s very possible to enjoy life while also enduring chronic pain. In fact, you could have a very happy life even with severe, debilitating pain every single day.

Unfortunately, of course, many chronic pain patients do not have all three of those things.

Even if they have access to opioids and other pain medications, they may not have the option to pace their activity levels due to things like work and parenting commitments. Or they may not have loved ones who show sympathy for what you’re going through and offer accommodations to make your life easier.

Sadly though, most doctors don’t recognize the importance of having all three things when they are treating chronic pain patients.

“Enjoying life” is usually not something doctors measure during treatments or appointments.  

Personally, I don’t think I have ever had a medical doctor ask me how much I’m enjoying life. Rather, they ask you to rate your pain level, and then either ignore you or send you off to another random specialist.

It’s why they don’t value the importance of prescribing pain medications that actually work, and why they rarely offer education for loved ones about how to better support the people in their life who have chronic pain.

It’s also why doctors rarely explain the importance of pacing your activity levels.

While I have had medical doctors tell me to quit working, I’ve had only one psychologist explain to me that instead of fully quitting, I could just cut back on some activities and plan more rest days.

In other words, stop pushing myself to the point of exhaustion before taking time to rest.

I assume that many doctors don’t grasp the concept of pacing, in large part because of their medical training. Residency scheduling makes it so that they are often working 24-hour shifts, with little time to recover before the next one.

In other words, the exact opposite of pacing.

When you have chronic pain, you can’t live that way though. Of course, technically, you can live that way, but you won’t enjoy life if you do.

If you accept the fact that you need to rest your body from time-to-time, you can actually do more activities in the long run.

However, under a capitalist system that prizes work, sometimes that is just not possible, no matter how much you want to pace yourself. In fact, the same applies to the other two things you need to enjoy life: Sometimes doctors just won’t give you pain medication and sometimes loved ones just will not support you.

There is good news though.

Even if you don’t have all three of those things, you can still find some joy in a life with chronic pain, as long as you are very stubborn and tenacious.

You just have to find alternative pain medications, like kratom or cannabis. And insist on creating a life that allows for pacing, whether that means changing jobs or moving in with family to help with daily life tasks. 

Then you have to educate your loved ones on how they can better accommodate you – and be prepared to pull back if they are mean or rude about it.

When I first developed chronic pain, I genuinely thought life was not worth living. That was more than a decade ago, and I’ve experienced countless joys since then: trips to Europe, meeting the love of my life, getting cats, and hugging my new niece.

Not to mention all the little joys, like fresh baked bread, cozy heated blankets on a cold winter night, and getting lost in a corn maze with my family.

I am very lucky to now have effective pain medication, a life that allows for pacing, and supportive loved ones. But I didn’t start that way. I rearranged my priorities to make it so. And it is possible that you can do the same.

You just have to stop trying to fight the pain, and instead learn to accept it. Then you can be free to live your life, while finding as many joys as you can along the way. 

No Healthcare for Lawmakers Until Every American Has Affordable Health Insurance

By Dr. Lynn Webster

Millions of Americans stand on the brink of losing the Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies that make their health insurance barely affordable. Without congressional action to extend those subsidies, families will face staggering premium hikes — forcing impossible choices between health coverage and rent, groceries or prescription drugs. Many will simply go without insurance.

Meanwhile, every member of Congress continues to enjoy taxpayer-funded health insurance, untouched by the very uncertainty they allow their constituents to endure. That disparity is indefensible.

A simple idea that would change the equation is that no elected representative in Congress should receive taxpayer-funded health care until every American has access to affordable health care.

If lawmakers had to share the same risks as their constituents, the urgency of reform would shift overnight. They would feel, in their own lives, the dread of losing coverage or facing premiums that devour a paycheck. They would no longer be insulated from the hardships they are sworn to alleviate.

This is not about punishment — it is about accountability and alignment. When lawmakers see their own well-being depends on fixing the system, solutions would rise above partisan theater.

Skeptics will point out that the Constitution protects congressional compensation, and they are right. Courts might interpret health benefits as part of that protection. That is why this should not be ordinary legislation. It should be a constitutional amendment — one that makes the principle unambiguous: members of Congress cannot enjoy taxpayer-funded health coverage until the people they serve have genuine access to affordable care.

Passing an amendment is never easy. But history shows it can be done when fairness demands it. Women’s suffrage, civil rights, and lowering the voting age all required constitutional change. Each once seemed out of reach — until public demand made it unstoppable.

This proposal does not dictate the specific policy mechanism — whether through extended subsidies, a public option, or another path. It sets only the principle that Congress must solve the problem before claiming benefits for itself. That principle is fairness.

And fairness should transcend party lines. At a time when the nation feels divided on nearly every issue, the idea that our leaders should not receive what they deny their constituents ought to unite, not separate us.

Making congressional health care contingent on achieving affordable care for all Americans could become a rare opportunity to bridge political divides and move the country toward greater unity.

Healthcare is not a privilege reserved for the political class. It is a necessity for every family. Across the nation, millions face losing coverage while their elected representatives remain fully protected. The injustice is clear.

Until every American has access to affordable healthcare, no member of Congress should accept it either. If they want the benefits, they must deliver them for the people they represent.

Anything less is a betrayal of public trust.

Lynn R. Webster, MD, is a pain and addiction medicine specialist and serves as Executive Vice President of Scientific Affairs at Dr. Vince Clinical Research, where he consults with pharmaceutical companies. He is the author of the forthcoming book, “Deconstructing Toxic Narratives -- Data, Disparities, and a New Path Forward in the Opioid Crisis,” to be published by Springer Nature. Dr. Webster is not a member of any political or religious organization.