Scientific Review Dismantles Myths Behind ‘Opiophobia’

By Crystal Lindell

“There is little evidence that physicians and surgeons prescribing opioids for short-term pain relief leads to substantial levels of opioid use disorder (OUD), addiction, or death.”

That one sentence, found in a new scientific review, cuts straight to the heart of America’s irrational fear of opioids — also known as opiophobia.

Published in ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science and authored by John Bumpus, PhD, the paper looks at the irrational fear that prescribing opioids in any capacity is harmful – and how little evidence there is to back up such claims. 

Bumpus opens his report by saying that there is a false narrative that “even short-term (seven days or less) use of opioids under medical supervision to treat acute pain will often lead to opioid use disorder (OUD) and/or addiction.”

As a result of that narrative, many healthcare professionals and policy makers believe that the best way to address this problem is to “avoid using opioids altogether or to severely limit the use of prescription opioids, especially after surgery.” 

Bumpus says many providers also assume that limiting prescriptions will significantly reduce overdose deaths. Then he adds the line that cuts to the heart of opiophobia: 

“There is, however, substantial evidence that this is not the case.”

In that one sentence, Bumpus dismantles the main argument that’s often used to claim that opioid restrictions are necessary: the idea that such restrictions are “evidence-based.” 

His report lays out how opioid-related misconceptions have led to policy decisions that are not only unsupported by evidence — but are often harmful. Anyone who has had trouble accessing needed opioid medications over the last few years will find the article both cathartic and affirming.  

Bumpus, who’s a Professor of Chemistry and Biochemistry at the University of Northern Iowa, starts the paper by defining "'opiophobia'" based on the definition shared in a 2023 paper, “Opiophobia and the tragedy of needless pain”

Opiophobia led many patients and providers to “fear, avoid or condemn the use of these compounds,” which Bumpus calls ‘the most effective family of analgesics known.”

While large chunks of the report focuses on surgical patients in post-operative pain, Bumpus says that many chronic pain patients use opioids “successfully and appropriately,” but have been “adversely affected by the catastrophization of issues and misinformation surrounding the use of opioids and the opiophobia it has generated."

Bumpus asserts that anti-opioid zealots have gone too far. 

“Although opioid-free protocols and policies may have their benefits and role, for some physicians, researchers, administrators, and politicians, the elimination of opioids appears to have become a goal in and of itself,” he warns. 

Bumpus says there's an underlying assumption "that physicians and surgeons are currently overprescribing opioids." He then adds, "Nationally, this does not appear to be the case."

While the number of opioid prescriptions decreased by about 50% from 2010 to 2022, Bumpus says deaths involving prescription opioids have remained constant. Meanwhile, fatal overdoses from illicit fentanyl and other synthetic opioids have skyrocketed.

“It does not appear that prescription opioids are the major problem here,” Bumpus concludes

He says those advocating for severe opioid limitation often ignore the adverse effects of alternatives like acetaminophen.

"For example, annually in the U.S., acetaminophen overdose is responsible for over 56,000 emergency department visits, 2600 hospitalizations and 500 deaths,” he writes. “Acetaminophen overdose is also the most common cause of acute liver failure and the most common reason for liver transplants in the U.S."

He says that "the narrative that the opioid crisis is caused by the prescribing habits of ethical, conscientious, and caring physicians is patently untrue."

Rather, what is true is that the “undertreatment of postoperative pain is a serious ongoing concern.”

Misleading Data Used to Justify Opioid Restrictions

While opioid-restricting polices may be well-intentioned, Bumpus says there is little evidence that physicians prescribing opioids for short-term pain leads to substantial levels of misuse.

For example, some of the claims used to justify opioid restrictions rely on a study that found 30% of Medicaid patients prescribed an opioid for the first time developed opioid dependency.

That is claim is misleading. The researcher was simply citing the fact that 30% of patients who filled a single opioid prescription needed a refill 3 to 9 months later. Getting a refill alone hardly meets the criteria for opioid dependency, much less addiction.

Bumpus says opioid restrictive policies have had the unintended effect of encouraging patients to store leftover opioids at home, which only makes them more likely to be misused by someone else. 

"Ironically, programs aimed at reducing access to opioids and their long-term storage may actually incentivize the hoarding of these medications," he says. 

People storing leftover opioids is understandable though, when patients fear their future pain will be untreated or they won’t be able to see a doctor.

"Long-term storage of opioid medications and self-medication may not be behaviors endorsed by the medical profession,” Bumpus says. “However, such behaviors are understandable human reactions, and they undoubtedly occur." 

Bumpus argues that while it’s illegal and medically unsupervised, using leftover prescription opioids is safer than turning to street drugs:

“These drugs serve as a relatively safe supply of opioids for people who use them,” he writes.

Ultimately, Bumpus says the public “should have access to information that accurately portrays the benefits as well as the risks associated with the medicinal use of opioids.” 

His paper is heavily researched and includes over 200 footnotes, including several PNN articles that debunk the narrative about opioid misuse being common. 

Bumpus says his paper is important for administrators, policymakers, and lawmakers to read, “so that mistakes of the past are not repeated, making sure that ill-conceived laws and policies are not put in place that do more harm than good.”

Bumpus is correct, of course, and his message is urgent. Now the medical community and policymakers just need to actually listen to him. 

A Pained Life: Stop Torturing Us

By Carol Levy

For many chronic pain conditions, such as Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, trigeminal neuralgia and Ehlers Danlos Syndrome, a major aspect is the spontaneity of pain attacks. They can come at any time and without warning.

Not being able to anticipate a pain flare may sound familiar to you. It causes psychological stress, keeping you in a constant state of fear and anxiety. The lack of predictability deprives a person of any sense of normalcy or control over their situation, causing helplessness and despair.

That often leads to other health problems and interrupts the sleep cycle, causing fatigue, disorientation and even cognitive decline. 

Where did this description of chronic pain come from?

It is actually a description (with some word modification) of torture and how disruptive it can be to a person. It’s striking how similar chronic pain and torture can be.

Having chronic pain is torture to me in an abstract way: I have pain. I can't find a way to stop it. I suffer as a result.

Like pain, torture is worse when it arrives unexpectedly and you have no way to stop it. You may be feeling okay, when suddenly a blitzkrieg of pain invades. You have no control or defense, and have no choice but to wait it out, cowering under the covers waiting for it to pass.

The Center for Victims of Torture writes this about using unpredictability as a torture technique:

“Randomizing torture makes it even more psychologically damaging and ethically problematic, as it deprives the victim of any control or predictability.”

Too often doctors miss the ethical implications of the effect of the pain on us, much less when one aspect of it is the unpredictability. The need for them to understand it is a necessary component of taking care of us and our needs --- what a physician, in the truest sense of the word, should do.

Too many of them, even those who claim “pain management” as their specialty, seem to get tired of listening as we explain the various ways our pain manifests. Most pain conditions don’t have a nice clean orderly way of detail.

It can be torturous to deal with the medical profession and its reluctance to accept our stories about living with chronic pain. It is harder still when a patient has the additional spontaneity of pain, being repeatedly physically and psychologically bombarded by it, and their defenses on the verge of being destroyed.

Doctors don’t seem to be able to understand this on their own. We may come to them psychologically tattered because of the pain. Those of us with spontaneous pain may come to them appearing very emotionally fragile.

As hard as it is, as difficult our lives already are due to the pain, we may have to be the ones to teach them, to help them to understand why we are so torn and battered. At the end of the day we need to tell them: “Please, listen to me. Understand me. Please, don’t be another level of torture.”

Carol Jay Levy has lived with trigeminal neuralgia, a chronic facial pain disorder, for over 30 years. She is the author of “A Pained Life, A Chronic Pain Journey.”  Carol is the moderator of the Facebook support group “Women in Pain Awareness.” Her blog “The Pained Life” can be found here. 

People Who Live in Rural Areas Have More Pain and Less Access to Treatment

By Crystal Lindell 

A new study by researchers at the University of Texas at Arlington found that people living in rural areas have significantly higher rates of chronic pain than those who live in big cities. They’re also at a big disadvantage when it comes to getting their pain treated.

As a rural resident myself for the last 11 years, I have some thoughts as to why this might be. I think one of the causes may be a little different than what researchers often assume. 

The study used data from a national health survey of over 10,000 people in 2019, and then followed up with them a year later in 2020. 

Respondents were split into four pain categories; those with no pain, nonchronic acute pain, chronic pain, and high-impact chronic pain (HICP), which is pain that significantly impacts daily life.

Participants were then assigned to one of four urban-rural metro areas based on where they live: Large Central Metro (big cities with at least one million people), Large Fringe Metro, Medium and Small Metro, and Non-Metropolitan (Rural).

The chart below shows that the highest rates of chronic pain (27.8%) and HICP (10.4%) were found in rural non-metropolitan areas. Pain rates were progressively lower in metro areas with more people. 

Notably, 43.1% of the people living in big cities had “no pain,” while only 34% of those in rural areas were pain free. That’s a statistically big difference.

The Journal of rural health

“We already know about the rural-urban gap in mortality and life expectancy,” said Feinuo Sun, PhD, an assistant professor of kinesiology at UT Arlington and lead author of the study in The Journal of Rural Health.

“But when you look at pain, especially chronic pain, it becomes clear that rural residents face additional burdens.”

Sun and her colleagues say their findings highlight the rural disadvantage that exists in pain development and treatment. Due to health care shortages in rural areas, people have limited access to pain treatment and lower quality services.

They also found that the percentages of people transitioning from milder pain conditions in 2019 to more severe ones in 2020 were highest in rural areas. Even when starting from the same baseline pain status, people in rural areas fared worse after one year compared to those in urban areas.

“Without early intervention, (chronic pain) can have serious long-term consequences, including premature mortality. That's why targeted outreach and early pain management strategies are so important," said Sun.

Rural residents are also more likely to work physically demanding jobs and experience higher poverty rates, both of which contribute to chronic pain.

Those are definitely contributing factors. People who live near me in northern Illinois tend have more physically demanding work, such as farming and construction, and they have a much harder time accessing good healthcare. 

Personally, I have to drive almost two hours each way just to see my primary care physician, because I have to get more complex pain care. That’s where the closest university hospital is to my house. 

Lower Cost of Living

But there’s another reason that is easy to overlook if you don’t live out here: Rural areas are much cheaper than urban ones. 

That’s literally the reason I choose to live in a rural area. The rent in my area is astronomically cheaper than nearby metro areas, and much less compared than a big city like Chicago. 

If you're managing a life with chronic pain, you’re going to be less likely to be able to work and you’re also going to be more likely to spend more of your income on medical expenses. You’ll need a cheaper place to live.

Additionally, many people move out to rural areas like mine because it’s easier to live on Social Security, disability or pensions. None of those benefits increase based on your local cost of living, so it makes sense to live in a rural area where the same amount of money can go much further. 

So it’s not always physically demanding labor that causes more pain in rural areas. It’s being in chronic pain that makes it more likely you’ll move to or stay in a rural community.

Of course, the researchers also found an association with opioid medication, because what would a pain study be in 2025 if the authors didn’t link it in some way to opioids?

The UT researchers think that  “elevated pain levels, along with fewer treatment options, may help explain the heavier reliance on opioids” in rural communities. They’re already working on a follow-up study to examine disparities in pain care. I can already tell them some of the answers they seek. 

People in rural areas are more likely to take opioids for pain care because they are incredibly cheap and accessible. Even if a rural area doesn’t have a local pharmacy, you still have access to mail-order pharmacies. 

And if a rural area doesn’t have a physical therapist, acupuncturist or a massage therapist, there are few alternatives besides opioids. Opioids also require fewer appointments with providers, which are at a premium when doctors are 2 hours away or more.

In the end, geography shapes both our pain and standard of living. Rural areas need better access to healthcare and more populated areas need lower costs of living. We can help people, we just have to work in both directions.  

Seniors Should Be Cautious Using Gummies and Other Cannabis Products

By Paula Span, KFF Health News

Benjamin Han, a geriatrician and addiction medicine specialist at the University of California-San Diego, tells his students a cautionary tale about a 76-year-old patient who, like many older people, struggled with insomnia.

“She had problems falling asleep, and she’d wake up in the middle of the night,” he said. “So her daughter brought her some sleep gummies” — edible cannabis candies.

“She tried a gummy after dinner and waited half an hour,” Han said.

Feeling no effects, she took another gummy, then one more — a total of four over several hours.

Han advises patients who are trying cannabis to “start low; go slow,” beginning with products that contain just 1 or 2.5 milligrams of tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, the psychoactive ingredient that many cannabis products contain. Each of the four gummies this patient took, however, contained 10 milligrams.

The woman started experiencing intense anxiety and heart palpitations. A young person might have shrugged off such symptoms, but this patient had high blood pressure and atrial fibrillation, a heart arrhythmia. Frightened, she went to an emergency room.

Lab tests and a cardiac work-up determined the woman wasn’t having a heart attack, and the staff sent her home. Her only lingering symptom was embarrassment, Han said. But what if she’d grown dizzy or lightheaded and was hurt in a fall? He said he has had patients injured in falls or while driving after using cannabis. What if the cannabis had interacted with the prescription drugs she took?

“As a geriatrician, it gives me pause,” Han said. “Our brains are more sensitive to psychoactive substances as we age.”

Unclear Benefits

Thirty-nine states and the District of Columbia now allow cannabis use for medical reasons, and in 24 of those states, as well as the district, recreational use is also legal. As older adults’ use climbs, “the benefits are still unclear,” Han said. “But we’re seeing more evidence of potential harms.”

A wave of recent research points to reasons for concern for older users, with cannabis-related emergency room visits and hospitalizations rising, and a Canadian study finding an association between such acute care and subsequent dementia.

Older people are more apt than younger ones to try cannabis for therapeutic reasons: to relieve chronic pain, insomnia, or mental health issues, though evidence of its effectiveness in addressing those conditions remains thin, experts said.

In an analysis of national survey data published June 2 in the medical journal JAMA, Han and his colleagues reported that “current” cannabis use (defined as use within the previous month) had jumped among adults age 65 or older to 7% of respondents in 2023, from 4.8% in 2021. In 2005, he pointed out, fewer than 1% of older adults reported using cannabis in the previous year.

What’s driving the increase? Experts cite the steady march of state legalization — use by older people is highest in those states — while surveys show that the perceived risk of cannabis use has declined.

One national survey found that a growing proportion of American adults — 44% in 2021 — erroneously thought it safer to smoke cannabis daily than cigarettes. The authors of the study, in JAMA Network Open, noted that “these views do not reflect the existing science on cannabis and tobacco smoke.”

The cannabis industry also markets its products to older adults. The Trulieve chain gives a 10% discount, both in stores and online, to those it calls “wisdom” customers, 55 or older. Rise Dispensaries ran a yearlong cannabis education and empowerment program for two senior centers in Paterson, New Jersey, including field trips to its dispensary.

The industry has many satisfied older customers. Liz Logan, 67, a freelance writer in Bronxville, New York, had grappled with sleep problems and anxiety for years, but the conditions grew particularly debilitating two years ago, as her husband was dying of Parkinson’s disease. “I’d frequently be awake until 5 or 6 in the morning,” she said. “It makes you crazy.”

Looking online for edible cannabis products, Logan found that gummies containing cannabidiol, known as CBD, alone didn’t help, but those with 10 milligrams of THC did the trick without noticeable side effects. “I don’t worry about sleep anymore,” she said. “I’ve solved a lifelong problem.”

But studies in the United States and Canada, which legalized nonmedical cannabis use for adults nationally in 2018, show climbing rates of cannabis-related health care use among older people, both in outpatient settings and in hospitals.

In California, for instance, cannabis-related emergency room visits by those 65 or older rose, to 395 per 100,000 visits in 2019 from about 21 in 2005. In Ontario, acute care (meaning emergency visits or hospital admissions) resulting from cannabis use increased fivefold in middle-aged adults from 2008 to 2021, and more than 26 times among those 65 and up.

“It’s not reflective of everyone who’s using cannabis,” cautioned Daniel Myran, an investigator at the Bruyère Health Research Institute in Ottawa and lead author of the Ontario study. “It’s capturing people with more severe patterns.”

But since other studies have shown increased cardiac risk among some cannabis users with heart disease or diabetes, “there’s a number of warning signals,” he said.

For example, a disturbing proportion of older veterans who currently use cannabis screen positive for cannabis use disorder, a recent JAMA Network Open study found.

As with other substance use disorders, such patients “can tolerate high amounts,” said the lead author, Vira Pravosud, a cannabis researcher at the Northern California Institute for Research and Education. “They continue using even if it interferes with their social or work or family obligations” and may experience withdrawal if they stop.

Among 4,500 older veterans (with an average age of 73) seeking care at Department of Veterans Affairs health facilities, researchers found that more than 10% had reported cannabis use within the previous 30 days. Of those, 36% fit the criteria for mild, moderate, or severe cannabis use disorder, as established in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.

VA patients differ from the general population, Pravosud noted. They are much more likely to report substance misuse and have “higher rates of chronic diseases and disabilities, and mental health conditions like PTSD” that could lead to self-medication, she said.

Current VA policies don’t require clinicians to ask patients about cannabis use. Pravosud thinks that they should.

Moreover, “there’s increasing evidence of a potential effect on memory and cognition,” said Myran, citing his team’s study of Ontario patients with cannabis-related conditions going to emergency departments or being admitted to hospitals.

Compared with others of the same age and sex who were seeking care for other reasons, research shows these patients (ages 45 to 105) had 1.5 times the risk of a dementia diagnosis within five years, and 3.9 times the risk of that for the general population.

Even after adjusting for chronic health conditions and sociodemographic factors, those seeking acute care resulting from cannabis use had a 23% higher dementia risk than patients with noncannabis-related ailments, and a 72% higher risk than the general population.

None of these studies were randomized clinical trials, the researchers pointed out; they were observational and could not ascertain causality. Some cannabis research doesn’t specify whether users are smoking, vaping, ingesting or rubbing topical cannabis on aching joints; other studies lack relevant demographic information.

“It’s very frustrating that we’re not able to provide more individual guidance on safer modes of consumption, and on amounts of use that seem lower-risk,” Myran said. “It just highlights that the rapid expansion of regular cannabis use in North America is outpacing our knowledge.”

Still, given the health vulnerabilities of older people, and the far greater potency of current cannabis products compared with the weed of their youth, he and other researchers urge caution.

“If you view cannabis as a medicine, you should be open to the idea that there are groups who probably shouldn’t use it and that there are potential adverse effects from it,” he said. “Because that is true of all medicines.”

KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues.

Should Pharmacists Tell Your Doctor How to Treat Pain?

By Pat Anson

Would you like a pharmacist to consult with your doctor about how to treat your chronic pain before you even see the doctor?

Given all the problems that pain patients already have getting pharmacies to fill their opioid prescriptions, that sounds counter-intuitive. But embedding a pharmacist in doctors’ offices and giving them advice is the premise behind a new article published in the Drug Topics Journal, written by Sarah Schang and Madison Irwin, who both have medical degrees in pharmacy (PharmD).   

They think giving pharmacists a prominent and early voice in your pain care will lead to better treatment and reduce the risk of controlled substances being misused. In their eyes, pharmacists “play key roles in educating other health care professionals and patients about safe and effective chronic pain management.”

Under federal law, pharmacists have a “corresponding responsibility” when filling prescriptions for opioids and other controlled substances – a legal right to refuse to fill prescriptions they consider unusual or improper. Usually that “responsibility” begins at the pharmacy level, but Drs. Schang and Irwin think it should start before prescriptions are even written for chronic pain conditions.

“Despite the high prevalence of chronic pain and its far-reaching consequences, it often has suboptimal management, typically involving a combination of pharmacotherapy that can quickly become complex and require expertise. Pharmacists are uniquely well positioned to provide this expertise and optimize medication management for chronic pain,” they wrote.

“There is an immense need for safe and effective medication management in chronic pain, and pharmacists have a unique role to play in meeting this need.”

Schang and Irwin cite several old pilot studies to support their claims. One study, published in 2018, involved 45 pain patients on high-dose opioids being treated at a large family medicine practice. A few days before their appointments, two pharmacists embedded in the practice reviewed patient charts and pain management plans, and recommended changes to their treating physicians.

Almost always, the recommendations were to taper the patients off opioids, switch to non-opioid analgesics, refer the patients to a pain specialist, and offer them a naloxone prescription to reverse overdoses. Those recommendations were often implemented.        

How did that work out for the patients? According to Schang and Irwin, there was a 14% average decrease in their daily dose of opioids in morphine milligram equivalents (MME), a tapering that was achieved “without impacting pain scores.”  

Is that what happened? Not really. A close look at the study itself shows that the average pain score went up after doses were lowered, from 5.3 before the pharmacists’ intervention to 5.5 afterward, based on a zero to 10 pain scale.

It’s also worth noting that these “high-risk” patients were on relatively high opioid doses before the intervention (135 MMEs daily). Even with the 14% reduction in dose, they were still getting an average of 116 MMEs daily – a dose that’s unattainable for most patients today due to fears about “overprescribing” opioids. Most patients in 2025 get less than 90 MME, in many cases substantially less.

Another pilot study cited by Schang and Irwin dates back to 2016. It involved a community pharmacy in an academic medical center in southern California. Pharmacists there reviewed the treatment plans of 23 patients on high dose opioids and recommended changes in their treatment, such as tapering, regular drug tests, and naloxone.

How the changes impacted the patients’ pain levels was apparently not evaluated, but particular attention was paid to their mental health. The most common problems identified by the pharmacists were “untreated” depression, anxiety, insomnia, and substance misuse.

“Notably, substance misuse was identified in nearly a third of patients, which allowed for subsequent referral to substance use disorder treatment when appropriate. Similar interventions in the community pharmacy setting also demonstrated significant value, with pharmacists identifying unaddressed issues with mood in nearly two-thirds of patients and increasing the uptake of naloxone,” Schang and Irwin wrote.

Being referred to addiction treatment or a psychiatrist probably isn’t the goal of most pain patients, who simply want their pain managed. That would go a long way toward resolving their “unaddressed” mental health issues.

Many pain patients today are already frustrated with pharmacists. They can’t get their opioid prescriptions filled due to opioid rationing, and are tired of the stigma and hostility they often face at pharmacies. The pharmacy industry itself is also going through a major contraction, with big chain pharmacies closing thousands of stores, leaving behind a dwindling supply of overworked pharmacists who are just as frustrated as the patients.

This is probably not a good time to embed pharmacists in clinical practices, and make a bad situation even worse.

People in Pain Need Healthy People to Fight for Them

By Neen Monty,

I haven’t written much lately, because I am sick.

I am not lazy, I do not lack commitment. Or motivation. Or determination.

That is an unfair characterization, an unfair criticism. One that is not uncommon for people who live with chronic pain or a chronic illness.

We are judged to be lazy, exaggerating, malingering, drug seeking. None of it is true.

I am sick. And I am disabled. But I am not just a “chronic pain patient,” as many like to reduce me to. “Chronic pain” is not my identity. It’s not who I am.

However, pain does dictate what I can and cannot do. Every decision I make is influenced and decided by my pain levels. Or rather, how much pain medication I am allowed to utilize.

If I did not have pain, I would still be disabled and sick every day. I never feel “good” in the way that healthy people feel good. I am always fatigued, weak and in pain. And I sure as heck do not choose that. No one would.

We, people like me, need allies. We need people to help us. Because we are too unwell to put 40 hours a week into advocacy and awareness raising. We don’t have that kind of time and energy.

We need people who are healthy to fight for us.

Because helping people who live with painful, progressive, incurable disease should be a given. Helping people who have experienced severe physical trauma and injuries should be a given. People should feel empathy for the ill and infirm. For the injured and traumatized.

Societies are judged on how they treat their weakest members. By this standard, our society is not doing well.

To help, you first have to understand, listen, and believe. You must trust that what we are saying is true.

You cannot be that doctor who “knows better.” The one who makes snap judgements about the woman who walks into the exam room limping, dressed in old clothes, and unkempt. Clearly a hysterical woman with psychological issues.

It’s doctors like that who misjudged me, leaving my serious and rare neurological disease undiagnosed. Because of those four neurologists who judged me, I now must live with constant and severe neuropathic pain every second for the rest of my life.

The insult to injury is that no doctor wants to prescribe opioid pain medication to allow me to manage that pain. To make the pain bearable. To make my life functional.

Had the first neurologist, or even the second one, done their job and diagnosed my disease over ten years ago, I would have had a chance at remission or even reversing the damage. Now? Not much hope of that. I’ll be lucky if the disease is slowed down a tad.

Judgement vs. Empathy

People who have no pain cannot understand what it is like to live with constant, severe pain.

But everyone can show empathy and compassion and kindness -- if they choose to.

I don’t receive a lot of empathy, compassion or kindness. I receive a lot of judgement. I receive a lot of trolling.  I have even been stalked.

Recently, when I had a crisis due to pain and forced opioid tapers, several very kind, empathetic and compassionate people reached out to me. Most were physiotherapists, also known as physical therapists. I cannot tell you how much their support and kindness meant to me. I will never forget.

These are some of the best people I have ever had the privilege to meet or chat with. Some don’t agree with my opioid use, and my opioid advocacy. But they still reached out to help me. I am so very grateful for that.

Many people still don’t believe my various illnesses are real. As I said, I went undiagnosed for over a decade because four neurologists decided I was just a hysterical woman.

Turned out I have a very serious disease. It took neurologist number five, and ten years, to get that diagnoses.

That should never happen, but it’s very common. Women are very often ignored, dismissed, accused of exaggerating or being hysterical.

I used to be a gym junkie, nutrition nazi, a super fit person. I did not bring any of this on myself though poor choices. Though people do love to tell me I did.

All I’m asking for is a better quality of life. And less pain.

I advocate strongly for people like me to have access to whatever pain treatments work. I am not pro-opioid. I am pro pain relief.

When I was in crisis, I also received messages from two doctors. One told me opioids do not work for pain, and that I should be ashamed of myself for promoting them. The other told me if doctors are not prescribing, I must be an addict.

Very unkind. They saw a person in crisis and thought that was a good time to attack. I cannot imagine that they treat their patients with respect, kindness and compassion, if that’s the way they treat me.

I am not able to do much work at the moment. I am far too unwell. My colleagues who live with constant, severe pain also have periods like this.

We support each other as much as we can, but we need support from healthier people.

We need allies.

We need people who live with less severe pain to help.

We need healthy people to help.

We need doctors, therapists, nurses and pharmacists to unlearn the crock science they’ve been taught and learn about real chronic pain. All the many types of chronic pain, not just one.

We need them to learn about chronic pain from the people who live with it. Not the people who profit from it.

We need allies.

Neen Monty is a writer and patient advocate in Australia who lives with rheumatoid arthritis and Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP), a progressive neurological disease that attacks the nerves.

Neen is dedicated to challenging misinformation and promoting access to safe, effective pain relief. She has created a website for Pain Patient Advocacy Australia to show that prescription opioids can be safe and effective, even when taken long term. You can subscribe to Neen’s free newsletter on Substack, “Arthritic Chick on Chronic Pain.”

5 Tips for Showering with Chronic Pain

By Crystal Lindell

One of the first things I had to come to terms with when I developed chronic pain in 2013 was that showers were no longer something I could do on a whim. 

My pain, which was eventually diagnosed as intercostal neuralgia in my right ribs, flares up when I put the energy and work into taking a shower. 

I’m not sure why showering seems to aggravate it, but I assume it’s related to the fact that I’m standing in one place for a long time, moving my arms in a certain way to clean my hair, and then the movements I do to get dressed afterward. 

All this means that I have to plan my showering schedule the way other people plan their gym workouts – with the expectation that I’ll need rest afterwards. 

I do still shower almost every day, because it’s important to me and I like feeling clean. But that doesn’t mean it’s not a struggle. And I will confess that there are some days when the pain is just too intense to get through a full shower. 

However, there are things you can do to make it both easier to shower with chronic pain, and to go longer periods of time between showers. 

Below are suggestions and advice that I’ve learned from living with chronic pain and caring for disabled relatives who live near me. 

Tip 1: Change your showering schedule to nights 

The first thing I did when I realized that showering was going to be an ordeal was to shift to showering at night. This sounds like a small thing, but for me it was a major change in my daily routine. 

Back when I started having chronic pain, I was still driving into an office everyday for a day job. Getting up to take a full shower, wash my long hair, and then get dressed in office clothes sometimes meant that I didn’t have the ability to drive into the office at all. I would literally have to call my boss to ask if I could work from home or take a sick day. 

When I realized that I no longer had the luxury of showering in the morning, I shifted to doing it the night before. That way, I could save my morning energy for throwing on clothes and light make-up before heading to work.

I no longer drive into an office job everyday, but I do still shower at night if I have anything I have to do outside of the house in the morning. 

It’s honestly one of the foundations of living with chronic pain: you have to plan out things that you didn’t have to think about before. You have to make sure you’re rationing your energy to get the most out of your limited supply. 

For showering, that means scheduling it for times when it doesn’t conflict with other high-energy activities. 

Tip 2: Use dry shampoo when you can’t shower

A lot of people already know about the wonders of dry shampoo, and how it can help you go longer between washing your hair. But most people don’t realize that it works best when it’s used as a preventative measure to keep your hair relatively clean. 

The trick to getting it to work best is to use it on freshly washed and dried hair, so that it can absorb the hair’s natural oil as it comes in. 

There are a ton of dry shampoo options on the market, but in my experience, the more expensive ones aren’t necessarily better. So feel free to reach for whatever you see at your local drug store. 

Personally, I’ve had a lot of success with the Batiste Brand. I like that their shampoos come in a lot of different scents and that they even offer versions for brunettes, who want to avoid the white residue that’s common with dry shampoos. 

Tip 3: Sponge roller curls can help you go longer between hair washings

After watching Agent Carter – a 1940s Marvel super hero TV show – I went through a phase where I was obsessed with all things 1940s style, including hair. 

That’s how I accidentally stumbled onto my next tip: setting your wet hair in foam sponge rollers will help you go a lot longer between washes. The women of the 1940s did this because shampoo was rationed or hard to come by during World War 2. It turns out they knew what they were doing. 

That’s because curly hair, even if it’s been brushed out, does not get oily as fast as straight hair. So if you add curls to straight hair, you won’t have to wash it as often. 

Here’s a quick Youtube tutorial that goes over the basics of using sponge rollers. There are tons more in-depth tutorials if you’re interested. Just make sure your hair is completely dry before you take the curlers out, otherwise they won’t set.

There are sponge rollers on Amazon currently listed for less than $10, but you can also find them at almost every drug store and discount retailer. 

Of course, there is one massive downside to using sponge rollers or any type of curling method at home – they take a lot of time and energy to do your hair. 

However, most salons will offer a service called a “wet set” for a reasonable price. It’s a tried and true service for older women, who tend to be in the demographic of people who aren’t able to wash their hair every day. 

As part of a wet set, the stylist will usually use rollers to give you tight curls, and then style it afterwards so that you can go longer between hair washes. 

Tip 4: Invest in a shower chair 

There are also accommodations that you can use to get through a shower easier. For example, I think a lot of people don’t realize just how helpful a shower chair can be. 

While I don’t use one myself, I have relatives who use a shower chair, which often is the difference between them being able to shower vs. not being able to shower at all. 

These days, you don’t have to order shower chairs from special medical supply services. You can get them for a very reasonable price online. This shower chair on Amazon is currently listed for less than $40, and it features a removable back. 

Tip 5: Use cleansing wipes between showers

Of course, there may be days when you just can’t get through a full shower, but you don’t want to feel dirty. In that case, I suggest investing in some bath wipes for adults. 

Again, I have not personally used a product like this, but I have multiple disabled relatives who found them to be extremely helpful. 

These bath wipes on Amazon are currently listed for less than $20, and they claim to both cleanse and soften your skin. 

You don’t need bath wipes to achieve this effect though. A wet washcloth with some soap used in a few key places can also achieve a similar effect. 

Hopefully you found some good tips on this list, and if you have any other tips or advice for getting through a life where showering is sometimes a luxury, please share them in the comments below!

Pain News Network may receive a small commission from the Amazon links listed in this article.

Eli Lilly Bet $1 Billion on Non-Opioids: Will Pain Patients Pay the Price?

By Crystal Lindell

Eli Lilly is investing heavily in new non-opioid pain treatments with its latest acquisition. The pharmaceutical company announced this week that it was acquiring SiteOne Therapeutics in a deal worth as much as $1 billion. 

SiteOne describes itself as “dedicated to the development of safe and effective pain therapeutics without the significant addiction potential and side effects of opioids.” 

The company has been working on a new class of non-opioid medication that targets sodium channels in the peripheral nervous system to treat pain and other nerve conditions. Blocking pain signals in peripheral nerves before they reach the brain means the drug is unlikely to lead to addiction or overdoses.

Its drug STC-004 is in Phase 2 of clinical trials. In a February 2025 press release about the medication, SiteOne said it's an oral medication that would likely be taken once a day “for acute and chronic peripheral pain.” 

Eli Lilly said it has high hopes that STC-004 “may represent a next-generation, non-opioid treatment for patients suffering from chronic pain.” 

It’s noteworthy that Lilly doesn’t even mention acute pain, which suggests the company sees the most potential for STC-004 as a chronic pain treatment.  

While any advancement in pain treatment is obviously welcome, it seems prudent to remain skeptical of any company touting a new medication because its a “non-opioid.”

Vertex Pharmaceuticals recently won FDA approval for Journavx (suzetrigine) a non-opioid that also blocks pain signals in the peripheral nervous system. The FDA approved Journavx for acute pain only, despite lackluster results in clinical trials showing that it works no better than a low dose of hydrocodone.

There’s been a gold rush over the last decade by Vertex, Lilly and other pharmaceutical companies hoping to cash in on the opioid-phobia that resulted from the 2016 CDC opioid guidelines. But it remains unclear if it will just result in fool’s gold for pain patients desperate for relief. 

Mark Mintun, VP of Neuroscience Research and Development for Lilly, admits that thus far “effective non-opioid treatment remains elusive.”

According to one estimate, the global chronic pain market was worth over $72 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to $115 billion by 2031.

With so much money on the line for any company that even partially succeeds in developing new pain relievers, resources are going to keep pouring into these non-opioid alternatives, regardless of how effective they actually are. 

The sad fact is that there just isn’t as much money in reliable, well-researched generic opioid medications like morphine, which are vastly cheaper than the non-opioids being developed to replace them. 

For chronic pain patients, the $1 billion that Eli Lilly used to acquire SiteOne would be more beneficial if it was spent on lobbying the government and medical professionals to expand access to opioid pain relievers. 

While my hope is that these types of opioid alternatives will deliver on their promises — my fear is that patients will eventually be forced onto them, even if they don't work nearly as well as opioids.

‘I Can Do It With a Broken Body’: How I Learned to Live with Chronic Pain

By Crystal Lindell

I can still remember the exact day when everything I thought I knew about physical pain was destroyed.

It was 2013, and I had just started to have chronic pain in my ribs a few months prior. Although it would eventually be diagnosed as intercostal neuralgia, and then years later as Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, at the time nobody seemed to know what was going on. 

The pain was debilitating and I had no idea how to cope with it. Every doctor I saw told me that my imaging and labs were “normal” so there was nothing they could do. They just repeatedly upped my dose of gabapentin and sent me on my way – wash, rinse, repeat as the gabapentin failed to help. 

I had spent another sleepless night tossing and turning in agony as the pain on my right side wrapped around my torso like a spiked metal snake tightening its hold on me. I was stuck in that impossible cycle where the less I slept, the more pain I felt – and the more pain I felt, the less I slept. 

At the time, I didn’t even know the term "chronic pain” yet, and I was struggling to find anyone else who seemed to understand what I was going through. Pain that never goes away was not supposed to happen – especially if there was no underlying injury that could be fixed with surgery. So it had not occurred to me to add "chronic" to my pain.

After being awake most of the night, I got up, dressed and drove myself to immediate care, hoping for a miracle. 

The miracle never came. 

I felt like I was going to die and thought that such a pain level would warrant some sort of response from a doctor – some sort of urgency. But instead, I was dismissed. Actually, worse than that, I was chastised for coming in again when they had already seen me a few weeks prior. 

After waiting over two hours to be seen, the doctor walked into the small exam room, looked up at me, recognized me from previous visits and scolded me, saying, “You still haven’t gotten this figured out?” 

As if I was the one who refused to figure it out. As if the doctors who all refused to help me couldn’t be held responsible because I was the one who was not doing my part. 

The only problem was, I had no idea what my part was even supposed to be. And more than a decade later, I’m still not always sure.

The doctor then quickly told me there was nothing they could do, and that I would need to follow up with my primary care physician. Then she told me to check out at the front desk. 

They did nothing to help me. Nothing at all. And the pain had only gotten more intense during all this. I went to my car feeling hopeless. And then I realized that my day was going to get worse. 

I had been dealing with this pain for multiple months at this point, which means I had already missed weeks worth of work. I suddenly realized that I was going to have to go to the office for the day. 

In pain. 

After spending all morning in immediate care. 

I was going to have to go to work. 

It’s a situation that would have seemed impossible to my healthy body just a few months before.. 

Up until that point, a trip to immediate care would have easily warranted a sick day from work. But even though it was only spring, I had already used up all my sick days for the year and then some. I couldn’t afford to miss a day for a health issue that was now as normal for me as it was horrific. 

After all, normal things require normal days. The pain was normal. So I had to go about my normal day and go to work. 

I sobbed in my car. It was the first time I truly understood that I was going to have to live my regular life in what was now regular pain. Prior to that moment, I would have assumed that the level of pain I was enduring was more than enough to make the world stop – or at least to make my world stop. 

I often think of the lyrics from the Taylor Swift song, “I Can Do It With a Broken Heart.” 

In the song, she laments having to go about her life with a smile after a bad romantic breakup left her feeling depressed, singing:

I was grinnin' like I'm winnin'

I was hittin' my marks

'Cause I can do it with a broken heart

For me, and millions of other people living with chronic pain, the title is slightly different: “I can do it with a broken body.”

Because that’s the thing about chronic pain, it seeps out into every aspect of your life like an oil spill, and you just have to live around it. I still have to work, feed my cats, feed myself, shower, pay bills, and see my family. 

It’s just that most days I have to do all that while also living with horrible pain. 

After more than a decade of living this way, I am relieved to report that I have found some coping strategies. I also moved and found new doctors, who took my pain more seriously, despite the lack of proof on MRI scans and blood work. 

I also meticulously scaled back my life over the years, peeling away things that I now understood were unnecessary. I live a quiet, low-commitment life, so that there is room to breathe while pain takes up all my oxygen. 

Things are not as bad as they were that day back in 2013. My pain is well managed, and my daily life is much more accommodating. 

And yet, the pain persists. It remains chronic. So I still spend most days “doing it with a broken body.”  Or as Taylor Swift put it:

Lights, camera, bitch, smile.

Even when you wanna die

Except for chronic pain patients, there are no lights and no camera. Just a life in pain. 

More Australians Are Trying Medical Cannabis for Chronic Pain

By Suzanne Nielsen and Myfanwy Graham  

More Australians than ever are being prescribed medicinal cannabis.

Medicinal cannabis refers to legally prescribed cannabis products. These are either the plant itself, or naturally occurring ingredients extracted from the plant. These ingredients, such as THC (tetrahydrocannabinol) and CBD (cannabidiol), are called cannabinoids. Some cannabinoids are also made in labs to act like the ones in the plant.

Medicinal cannabis comes in different forms, such as oils, capsules, dried flower, sprays and edible forms such as gummies.

Since regulatory changes in 2016 made medicinal cannabis more accessible, Australia’s regulator has issued more than 700,000 approvals. Around half of the approvals have been for chronic pain that isn’t caused by cancer.

In Australia, chronic pain affects around one in five Australians aged 45 and over, with an enormous impact on people’s lives.

So what does the current evidence tell us about the effectiveness of medicinal cannabis for chronic pain?

Limited Benefits

A 2021 review of 32 randomised controlled trials involving nearly 5,200 people with chronic pain, examined the effects of medicinal cannabis or cannabinoids. The study found a small improvements in pain and physical functioning compared with a placebo.

A previous review found that to achieve a 30% reduction in pain for one person, 24 people would need to be treated with medicinal cannabis.

The 2021 review also found small improvements in sleep, and no consistent benefits for other quality of life measures, consistent with previous reviews.

This doesn’t mean medicinal cannabis doesn’t help anyone. But it suggests that, on average, the benefits are limited to a smaller number of people.

Many pain specialists have questioned if the evidence for medicinal cannabis is sufficient to support its use for pain.

The Faculty of Pain Medicine, the professional body dedicated to the training and education of specialist pain physicians, recommends medical cannabis should be limited to clinical trials.

Guidance from Australia’s regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), on medicinal cannabis for chronic non-cancer pain reflects these uncertainties. The TGA states there is limited evidence medicinal cannabis provides clinically significant pain relief for many pain conditions. Therefore, the potential benefits versus harms should be considered patient-by-patient.

The TGA says medicinal cannabis should only be trialled when other standard therapies have been tried and did not provide enough pain relief.

In terms of which type of medical cannabis product to use, due to concerns about the safety of inhaled cannabis, the TGA considers pharmaceutical-grade products (such as nabiximols or extracts containing THC and/or CBD) to be safer.

This evidence may feel at odds with the experiences of people who report relief from medicinal cannabis.

In clinical practice, it’s common for individuals to respond differently based on their health conditions, beliefs and many other factors. What works well for one person may not work for another.

Research helps us understand what outcomes are typical or expected for most people, but there is variation. Some people may find medicinal cannabis improves their pain, sleep or general well-being – especially if other treatments haven’t helped.

Side Effects and Risks

Like any medicine, medicinal cannabis has potential side effects. These are usually mild to moderate, including drowsiness or sedation, dizziness, impaired concentration, a dry mouth, nausea and cognitive slowing.

These side effects are often greater with higher-potency THC products. These are becoming more common on the Australian market. High-potency THC products represent more than half of approvals in 2025. In research studies, generally more people experience side effects than report benefits from medical cannabis.

Medical cannabis can also interact with other medications, especially those that cause drowsiness (such as opioids), medicines for mental illness, anti-epileptics, blood thinners and immunosuppressants. Even cannabidiol (CBD), which isn’t considered intoxicating like THC, has been linked to serious drug interactions.

These risks are greater when cannabis is prescribed by a doctor who doesn’t regularly manage the patient’s chronic pain or isn’t in contact with their other health-care providers. Since medicinal cannabis is often prescribed through separate telehealth clinics, this fragmented care may increase the risk of harmful interactions.

Another concern is developing cannabis use disorder (commonly understood as “addiction”). A 2024 study found one in four people using medical cannabis develop a cannabis use disorder. Withdrawal symptoms – such as irritability, sleep problems, or cravings – can occur with frequent and heavy use.

For some people, tolerance can also develop with long-term use, meaning you need to take higher doses to get the same effect. This can increase the risk of developing a cannabis use disorder.

Like many medicines for chronic pain, the effectiveness of medicinal cannabis is modest, and is not recommended as a sole treatment.

There’s good evidence that, for conditions like back pain, interventions such as exercise, cognitive behavioural therapy and pain self-management education can help and may have fewer risks than many medicines. But there are challenges with how accessible and affordable these treatments are for many Australians, especially outside major cities.

The growing use of medicinal cannabis for chronic pain reflects both a high burden of pain in the community and gaps in access to effective care. While some patients report benefits, the current evidence suggests these are likely to be small for most people, and must be weighed against the risks.

If you are considering medicinal cannabis, it’s important to talk to your usual health-care provider, ideally one familiar with your full medical history, to help you decide the best approaches to help manage your pain.

Suzanne Nielsen, PhD, is a Professor and Deputy Director of the Monash Addiction Research Centre at Monash University in Melbourne, Australia.  Suzanne has been a registered pharmacist for over 20 years. Her clinical experience in the treatment of substance use disorders includes working in specialist drug treatment and community-based alcohol and drug treatment settings in Australia and the United Kingdom.

Myfanwy Graham is a Postgraduate Scholar and Researcher at the Monash Addiction Research Centre. She has been a registered pharmacist for over 17 years and was a consultant to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, the World Health Organization, and the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine.

This article originally appeared in The Conversation and is republished with permission.

‘Zombie’ Nerve Cells Make Chronic Pain Worse

By Pat Anson

The zombies are at it again.

Weeks after researchers announced a new way to treat low back pain by targeting so-called zombie cells – a new study suggests that peripheral nerve pain could also be treated with drugs that target aging cells.

Senescent neurons are cells that stop dividing, but refuse to die and linger in the central nervous system. As people age, more and more of these “zombie cells” build up, secreting inflammatory agents that increase pain sensitivity and raise the risk of age-related diseases like arthritis, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s.

“Very little is known about underlying causes of pain experienced during aging. The prevalence of chronic pain in aging populations and the lack of effective and non-addictive treatments motivated this exploration into neuronal senescence as a potential mechanism,” Lauren Donovan, PhD, a research scientist at Stanford University, told PsyPost.

In studies on laboratory animals, Donovan and her colleagues at Stanford found that pain was amplified in older mice by senescent cells, which released inflammatory signals when the mice were injured. The same inflammatory reaction was found in younger mice, but was more pronounced in the older ones.

When the injured mice were treated with a drug called ABT263 – a compound that destroys senescent cells – the older mice showed less pain sensitivity and significant improvement in their weight-bearing behavior.

The younger mice treated with ABT263 showed only modest improvements in their pain-related behavior, which suggests that senescent cells play a significant role in causing chronic pain.

“The key takeaway for the average person is that as we age, some of our sensory neurons undergo a process called senescence, which may contribute to chronic pain,” said Donovan, who reported the findings in the journal Nature Neuroscience.

“In addition, we found that injury can exacerbate senescence in neurons, leading to an additive effect of aging and injury that may enhance pain. This research identifies a new potential target for treating chronic pain, especially in older individuals. It suggests that addressing cellular senescence in the nervous system can lead to new ways of managing pain and sensory dysfunction.”

Researchers at McGill University reported similar findings last month in studies on laboratory mice with damaged discs. When the mice were given drugs that targeted senescent cells in their spines, they experienced less pain and their bone quality improved.

Previous animal studies have shown that senolytic drugs can reverse osteoarthritis by eliminating senescent cells, giving the body a chance to repair and rejuvenate damaged cartilage.

The findings need to be replicated in humans, but they suggest that senolytic drugs that target zombie cells have the potential to prevent or even cure some age-related diseases.

Anti-Inflammatory Drugs May Increase Risk of Pain Becoming Chronic

By Pat Anson

Aspirin, ibuprofen and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have long been used to relieve back pain, muscle aches and other types of acute, short-term pain. The medications work by reducing inflammation, and are consider safer than stronger analgesics like opioids.

It turns out NSAIDs may do more harm than good by increasing the risk of acute pain becoming chronic.

In a series of studies on lab animals and humans, a team of researchers at McGill University found the NSAIDs, steroids, and other drugs that block inflammation may inhibit the body’s natural healing process. That can make the pain last longer than it should, according to research findings published in Science Translational Medicine.

“Clinical data showed that the use of anti-inflammatory drugs was associated with increased risk of persistent pain, suggesting that anti-inflammatory treatments might have negative effects on pain duration,” wrote lead author Jeffrey Mogil, PhD, a Professor of Pain Research at McGill University.

Mogill and his colleagues studied the transition from acute to chronic low back pain (LBP) in 98 adults by analyzing their immune cells. They focused on neutrophils, a type of white blood cell that is attracted to sites of inflammation and releases chemicals that promote an immune response to fight infection and heal tissue.

In participants whose lower back pain resolved and did not become chronic, researchers found evidence that their neutrophils and other natural biological processes performed normally, protecting them from transitioning to chronic pain.

Participants whose pain turned chronic showed signs that the healing process and neutrophils were impaired. This suggests that anti-inflammatory drugs that block neutrophils may interfere with the healing process by reducing inflammation too soon.

To test their theory, researchers analyzed health data from 500,000 people in the UK Biobank project, a long-term research study, to see if the medications they took for acute back pain had any negative consequences. They found that people who took NSAIDs had a higher risk of reporting chronic back pain 2 to 6 years later. Those who took antidepressants, which do not interfere with inflammation, did not have a higher risk of chronic pain.   

In animal studies, the McGill researchers found that laboratory mice given anti-inflammatory drugs had pain that lasted up to ten times longer than normal. Interestingly, mice given gabapentin, morphine or lidocaine – analgesics that do not have anti-inflammatory properties – did not experience longer pain episodes.

None of this proves anything – correlation is not causation – but it suggests that anti-inflammatory drugs may not be good for long-term pain management. They may be effective for short-term pain relief, but have the unintended effect of making pain last longer. If confirmed in future studies, researchers say their findings could have a substantial impact in how we manage pain.

“Together, our results suggest that active immune processes confer adaptation at the acute pain stage, and impairment of such inflammatory responses in subjects with acute LBP increases the risk of developing chronic pain,” researchers said. “Specifically, our data suggest that the long-term effects of anti-inflammatory drugs should be further investigated in the treatment of acute LBP and likely other pain conditions.”     

Online Emotional Support Therapy Modestly Reduces Chronic Pain

By Pat Anson

An online support program designed to “retrain the emotional brain” modestly reduces chronic pain and helps patients keep their negative emotions in check, according to a small pilot study in Australia.

Many people with chronic pain also develop anxiety and depression, but are unable to get psychological treatment because they live in rural areas or have mobility issues, and don’t have easy access to a therapist.

“We’ve known now for some time that chronic pain is more than just ‘Ouch, it hurts.’ It’s more than a sensory experience, it’s incredibly emotional,” says lead author Nell Norman-Nott, PhD, a research fellow at the University of New South Wales and clinical trial manager at the NeuroRecovery Research Hub.

Norman-Nott and her colleagues enrolled 89 people with chronic pain in the “Pain and Emotion Therapy” program. Half of the patients participated in 8 weekly group sessions over Zoom, in which a therapist teaches them emotional skills such as distraction, breathing exercises, and relaxation and self-soothing techniques.

The other participants received the treatment they were already getting, such as medication or physical therapy, and served as a control group.

The study findings, published in JAMA Network Open, show that after 9 weeks there were moderate improvements in depression, anxiety and sleep in those that received online therapy. But there was no change in pain intensity compared to those in the control group.

However, after a 6-month follow-up period, participants reported a 10% reduction in their pain levels, as well as continued improvement in their emotions and sense of well-being.

One of them is Janelle Blight, who lives with chronic back pain, arthritis and neuropathic pain. For the first time in 30 years, she was able to reduce her morphine dose after getting online therapy.

“I’ve been on a lot of opioids and things like that, but I’ve had nothing or found no course that’s been able to help take away the pain or help control the pain at home,” said Blight. “By doing the course, I’ve been able to learn how to reduce my emotional side of my pain, which has helped my chronic pain in the end.”

During a briefing with reporters, researchers called the study a “major step forward in pain care.” But in the actual study, they said the 10% reduction in pain intensity after six months was not well understood and “should be treated with caution.” The improvement was dependent on participants continuing to use the emotional skills they developed during online therapy.

Researchers hope to build on what they’ve learned with a larger study involving 300 participants in 2026. Registrations are open (for Australians only) on the NeuroRecovery Research Hub website.

How Workplace Conditions Contribute to Chronic Pain and Mental Health Issues

By Pat Anson

If you are of a certain age – like me – you’ll remember when computers started entering the workplace in the 1980’s. There was a huge learning curve, but eventually work became faster and more efficient.

There was also a tradeoff: employees reported back and neck pain from sitting at keyboards all day, and carpal tunnel syndrome became a thing. Companies learned about the hazards of repetitive motion, and how chair height, limited desk space and poorly shaped computer mouses affected worker health, absenteeism and productivity. A new industry was born: ergonomics.

Flash forward 40 years and companies are now being urged to think about “emotional ergonomics” – how workplace stress contributes to anxiety, depression, burnout, and chronic pain.

“Physical pain is often a symptom of deeper, underlying stressors—from job pressures to mental health challenges. Addressing industrial ergonomics without considering emotional well-being is an incomplete strategy. The most forward-thinking companies recognize that true injury prevention must integrate both,” says Kevin Lombardo, CEO of the DORN Companies.

DORN has partnered with organizations that specialize in ergonomics, business psychology, and suicide prevention on a new white paper called “Emotional Ergonomics: How the Intersection of Industrial Ergonomics, Pain, and Mental Health Shapes Worker Wellbeing.”

The paper’s main findings are that workplace conditions deeply affect the physical and mental health of workers, and that organizations must address them together to have a healthy, high-performing workforce. Workplace stress affects 40% of employees in the United States and contributes to about $190 billion in added healthcare costs.

Unlike the 1980’s, when most jobs entailed a 40-hour work week and were performed outside the home, today’s knowledge-driven economy blurs the lines between professional and personal lives. Employees may get work-related emails or texts at all hours of the day and night, and a growing number work from home. This increases exposure to stress, cognitive demands, poor sleep habits, and the psychosocial risks that come with juggling work, family and personal time.

A recent study found that stress and anxiety have become the most common work-related injuries, accounting for over half (52%) of new cases. That trend is mirrored in Google searches for “burnout,” which have risen dramatically in the last 10 years.

“This research signals a necessary shift in how we approach workplace well-being. Emotional Ergonomics bridges the gap between physical safety and mental resilience, ensuring that employee health is not just a compliance checkbox but a business imperative. Organizations that fail to recognize this connection risk long-term workforce instability and financial strain,” says Dr. Sally Spencer-Thomas, President of United Suicide Survivors International.

Common psychosocial hazards in the workplace include:

• Excessive workload and time pressures

• Toxic relationships between coworkers and supervisors

• Hazing, bullying, harassment and discrimination

• Exposure to workplace accidents and trauma

• Low autonomy and limited decision-making

• Job insecurity

• Work-Life disruption

To address these issues, companies can adjust workloads and allow for more flexible scheduling; adopt health and wellness programs; train supervisors in empathetic communication skills; and allow for “quiet time” and space where workers can decompress from job strain.

The goal is to view workers not as cogs in a machine, but as individuals with different physical, emotional, and psychological needs. An “I’ve got your back” mentality in the workplace builds trust and helps employees feel valued.  

To learn more about the study findings and ways to build emotional ergonomics, you can sign up to watch a live webinar on Wednesday, May 21.

Forced Tapering: Only Chronic Pain Patients Are Treated This Way

By Neen Monty

Imagine this: A patient, let’s call her Sue, has severe depression. Her GP prescribes an anti-depressant and refers her to a psychologist. Sue is advised to come back in four weeks. Which she does.

She’s not doing better, so the dose is increased. Sue is reviewed two more times over the next eight weeks, and each time her dose is increased.

Sue starts feeling better. The medication is working. The darkness has lifted, the black dog has been banished. She is grateful to her GP.

The GP is also happy. It has taken many weeks, but the GP raised the dose to find the minimum effective dose that controls Sue’s depression.

Sue comes back in another four weeks. She is happy, back at work, and socialising again. Life is good!

That’s when the GP tells her that it’s time to taper the anti-depressants.

Wait, what?

Or how about this: Sue has high blood pressure. She is at her GP for her yearly physical and the hypertension is discovered. The doctor prescribes a blood pressure medication and advises Sue to return in two weeks. At this review, her blood pressure is still too high, so the dose is increased.

Sue has two more dose increases, and her blood pressure falls into the normal range. She is experiencing no side effects and is very happy with the treatment.

When Sue sees her GP again with perfect blood pressure, he is pleased. Then he tells her it’s time to taper off the medication.

What if Sue had high cholesterol? Or high blood sugar? Or asthma? Epilepsy maybe?

I think you see where I am going with this.

The tapering would never happen, because it’s ludicrous and makes no sense, medically or otherwise. In these situations, people like Sue are often advised that they need to be on a medication for rest of their lives.

Where in medicine do doctors increase the dose of a medication until the symptoms are well managed and the patient is doing better -- and then gets tapered?

Only when the patient has chronic pain and is on opioid therapy. Doctors will prescribe a trial of opioids, which prove to be effective. The patient reports well-controlled pain, no significant side effects, and they are back at work, socialising, and living life again.

And then the doctor starts tapering the opioids. Against the patient’s wishes.

Utter insanity.

That’s not “evidence-based medicine.” There is no evidence to support this practice. I know what the theory is, and what doctors have been taught. But it’s not realistic. Yet many doctors don’t question it.

The theory is that once a patient gets pain relief, they will learn how to manage it without opioids. They’ll start to exercise and meditate, see a psychologist, work on their sleep hygiene, and get proper nutrition.

Except these other modalities will do nothing for severe, disabling pain.

Please point me to one study that shows that improving sleep will reduce the pain of multiple sclerosis, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, or Parkinson’s disease. Or one study that shows cognitive behavioral therapy or mindfulness will reduce the pain of rheumatoid arthritis and lupus.

Those treatments may be helpful in very small ways. But their effect has been vastly overstated for chronic secondary pain -- pain that is caused by an injury, tissue damage, or disease.

Lifestyle modification can have an impact on a person who has mild to moderate primary pain -- chronic pain that does not have a known pathological cause. That pain is sometimes driven by emotional or psychological causes, so psychological treatments might be effective.

But they are ineffective for chronic secondary pain.

People will feel better on opioids, but its not “euphoria.” It’s because they can start exercising again, restart their hobbies, and return to work. They’ll feel happy again. Those positive things happen because their pain is now being treated.

Take away the pain medication, and the pain will return. The career grinds to a halt, the social life disappears, depression returns. Exercise is impossible while in severe pain. Everything returns to terrible.

There is no magic trick that can replace opioids. There is nothing else that will touch severe pain, be it acute or chronic.

And so, for doctors to provide a trial of opioids for secondary pain with the goal of eventually tapering patients is insanity. The only reason opioids should be tapered is if there are intolerable side effects, if they are not effective for the pain, or the patient wants to taper.

No one should be forcibly tapered. Ever. Forced tapering leads to a pain crisis, suicidal ideation, overdose and death. That’s what the science says.

Opioids are safe and effective when taken long term by a select minority of people – those who live with severe, disabling pain due to an incurable disease or injury.

Think about how cruel it is to provide them with a solution to their pain, to give them their life back, and then take it away.

Its abhorrent.

Its barbaric.

It’s not medicine. It’s not science. It’s not human.

Neen Monty is a writer and patient advocate in Australia who is dedicated to challenging misinformation about pain management. Drawing on lived experience and scientific research, Neen has created a website for Pain Patient Advocacy Australia that is full of evidence that opioids can be safe and effective, even when taken long term. You can also subscribe to her free newsletter on Substack, “Arthritic Chick on Chronic Pain.”