Why Untreated Pain Can Lead to Violence

By Dr. David Hanscom

I spent the first eight years of my medical practice performing surgery for back pain. Seattle, Washington in 1986 was one of the most aggressive regions in the country regarding the indications for this operation. The reason for the surge was that we were introduced to newer technology that allowed us to attain a solid spinal fusion a higher percent of the time.

I was excited to be able to offer the option of surgery to my patients and felt badly if I could not find a reason to help someone out with an operation. I followed all my patients indefinitely and worked hard on optimizing the rehab. My results seemed okay, but were not close to what I wanted them to be.

Then the data came out in 1994 that the success rate two years after a spine fusion for low back pain in an injured worker was only about 30 percent. I immediately stopped doing the procedure, but did not know what else to offer. In the meantime, I began my own descent into severe pain.

During this period, I performed a one-level lumbar fusion for a young gentleman in his early 30’s. He had a work-related injury and was in pain and disabled for over 3 years. I worked with him for about 6 months to stabilize his medications, supervised his physical therapy, and recommended several back injections. I knew nothing about chronic pain and the implications of a sensitized nervous system.

After the operation, he was worse. I saw him every two to four weeks for over a year to do what I could to help him. He became increasingly frustrated, and his behavior became so aggressive, I had to dismiss him from care. He quickly assaulted his grandmother for money for meds. He then headed with a gun to Eastern Washington, where I was holding a satellite clinic.

“He’s coming after you with a gun,” a relative warned. We alerted the police and fortunately he never showed up. I never heard from him again.

Around this time, one of my spine partner’s patients begin to scream and yell in the middle of a full waiting room because he had a failed spine surgery and his disability had run out. He proceeded to pick up a potted plant and throw it across the room. Fortunately, no one was injured.

Spine Surgeon Killed

Dr. Preston Phillips was a spine surgeon who was shot and killed a few weeks ago in Tulsa, Oklahoma by a patient who was angry about his post-operative pain. Phillips was a colleague of mine in Seattle. I did not know him well, but interacted with him in conferences and some patient care. He was as nice a person as I have ever worked with.

It may be easy to blame Phillips for doing a surgery that apparently failed, but it is not his fault. His patient had chronic back pain and almost none of us in medicine are trained to treat it effectively, in spite of the data being right in front of us for decades. We are treating almost all symptoms and disease from a structural perspective, when most of them arise from the body’s physiological state of being in a sustained “flight or fight” response.

Phillips was doing what he was trained to do with the best of intentions. His patient was trapped in an endless cycle of pain and surgery is often viewed as the definitive answer. It requires enduring even more pain and anxiety, so the level of disappointment is even higher when surgery fails.

The Abyss

One afternoon, I was listening to a patient attempting to describe the depth of her suffering and it hit me how deep and hopeless this hole of chronic pain is for most people. I realized that words were inadequate to encapsulate their degree of misery. Since no one seemed to have any answers, there was no apparent way out. The description that seemed to fit for this dark, bottomless pit was “The Abyss.”

A 2007 research paper documented that the effect of chronic pain on one’s life is similar to the impact of having terminal cancer. With cancer, you at least know the diagnosis and that there is an endpoint, one way or the other.

Suffering from terminal cancer is horrible, but living with constant pain without a cure, treatment or endpoint is even worse. Here are just a few of the ways:

• You have been told that there is nothing wrong and you have to live with your pain the best you can. The reality is that there is a physiological explanation for all of it.

• You may have been given the diagnosis of “Medically Unexplained Symptoms.” This is simply not true based on the last 20 years of basic science research.

• You are labeled by almost everyone, including the medical profession. The labels include drug seeker, malingerer, lazy, unmotivated, making things up, and not tough enough. The list is endless.

When you are trapped by anything, especially pain, your frustration and anger is deep and powerful. This scenario creates an even more intense flight or fight response. The blood supply to your brain shifts from the thinking center to the survival midbrain, and your behaviors may become irrational. There does not seem to be way out and you lose hope.

The literature also shows that pain is often worsened when surgery is performed in the presence of untreated chronic pain. I was also not aware of that data until after I quit my surgical practice. For Phillips’ patient to act out the way he did is unacceptable, but being trapped causes people to act irrationally.

Anger is not only destructive; it can be self-destructive. Suicide is problematic in patients suffering from relentless pain. For many, it seems to be the only way out. I was also at that point towards the end of my pain ordeal.

Physical therapy, chiropractic adjustments, injections, acupuncture, vocational retraining, medications, traction, inversion tables, and finally surgery. How many times can your expectations be dashed before you lose hope?

All the parties in the Tulsa shooting were victims of the business of medicine, and I put the blame squarely on its shoulders. Physicians are inadequately trained in chronic pain and data-based effective treatments are not usually covered by insurance. Physicians are often rushed, don’t have time to talk to patients, and their patients don’t feel heard. These are just some of the variables, but the energy is all aimed in the same direction: Money.

There are real solutions for your pain. Learning to calm and redirect your nervous system out of a threat state is a learned set of well-documented interventions. These techniques are not particularly profitable, but that is not the primary reason I went into medicine.

Both the medical profession and patients are going to have to demand a change in the paradigm of treating people. The first step being that you need to be heard and that takes time. It needs to happen soon.

David Hanscom, MD, is a retired spinal surgeon who has helped hundreds of back pain sufferers by teaching them how to calm their central nervous systems without the use of drugs or surgery.

Hanscom has a website called The DOC Journey, in which he shares his own experience with chronic pain and offers patients a pathway out of mental and physical pain through mindful awareness and meditation.

He is the author of “Do You Really Need Spine Surgery?” and “Back in Control.”

Kolodny Returns as PROP President

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

After an eight-year hiatus, much of it spent testifying as a paid expert witness in opioid litigation trials, Andrew Kolodny, MD, has been reappointed as president of Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing (PROP), the anti-opioid activist group that he founded. Kolodny succeeds Dr. Jane Ballantyne, who remains with the organization as VP for Clinical Affairs.

“I am delighted to serve in this role again, especially at a time when the need for more cautious opioid prescribing in the United States and abroad is becoming increasingly clear to clinicians, policymakers and the public,” Kolodny said in a press release.

Kolodny served as PROP’s first president from 2010 until 2014, when he was Chief Medical Officer at Phoenix House, a nationwide chain of addiction treatment centers. He is currently the Medical Director of Opioid Policy Research at Brandeis University.

Although Kolodny is a psychiatrist with a background in addiction treatment and lacks expertise in pain management, he has played a prominent role in reducing the use of opioids to treat pain. He lobbied Congress and federal health agencies for years to limit opioid prescribing, and is often quoted making sensational anti-opioid comments in the media, calling them “heroin pills” or saying that over-the counter drugs like ibuprofen “are as effective and in some cases more effective than opioids.”   

He stopped talking to this reporter years ago, saying he doesn’t like my questions and hasn’t had “a good experience” answering them.

Paid Expert Witness

Kolodny’s reinstatement as PROP’s president comes at a time when many opioid litigation cases are wrapping up against drug manufacturers and distributors, resulting in multi-billion dollar settlements with states, cities and counties. The plaintiff law firms who filed and pursued those cases stand to make billions of dollars themselves in contingency fees.

Kolodny was a paid expert witness or consultant for at least four of those law firms (Motley Rice, Nix Patterson, Cohen Milstein and Scott & Scott), making as much as $500,000 when he testified at a rate of $725 an hour in Oklahoma’s lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson.

That case, which resulted in a $425 million verdict against the drug maker, was overturned last year by Oklahoma’s Supreme Court, which ruled that J&J was not the “public nuisance” that Kolodny and the state attorney general portrayed it to be.  

A similar ruling was made by a California judge, who said opioid manufacturers did not use deceptive marketing and were not liable for the state’s opioid crisis. Dr. Anna Lembke, a Stanford psychiatrist and PROP board member, testified as a paid witness for plaintiffs in that case, but Judge Peter Wilson said her testimony about opioid addiction was unreliable.

DR. ANDREW KOLODNY

Court records show that Lembke was paid up to $800 an hour for her testimony in a New York opioid litigation case.

Public records also show that Kolodny was hired as an “expert consultant” by at least one state. In 2020, he signed a contract with the New York State Department of Financial Services to provide “consultation on medical issues and trends regarding the prescription of opioids” at a rate of $600 an hour. In one invoice, Kolodny billed the state $1,500 for making two phone calls. The maximum amount to be paid to Kolodny was later set at $174,999.

In addition to Kolodny and Lembke, at least five other PROP board members have testified as paid expert witnesses or consultants in opioid litigation: Ballantyne, Dr. Danesh Mazloomdoost, Dr. Adriane Fugh-Berman, Dr. Mark Sullivan and Dr. David Juurlink. Mazloomdoost was paid a rate of $850 an hour for his testimony.

PROP members have failed on repeated occasions to disclose these business relationships, but when questions were raised about them, they filed revised conflict of interest statements — without providing details on who they worked for or the amount they were paid.

PROP itself has not been transparent about its finances. PROP is not a public charity and has never filed a tax return. It takes advantage of a loophole in IRS law by having the Steve Rummler Hope Foundation as its “fiscal sponsor,” which allows donors to make tax-deductible donations anonymously.

PROP says it does not accept funding from “pharmaceutical companies and other life sciences corporations.” Kat Marriott, PROP’s Executive Director, did not respond to an email asking if the organization accepted money from law firms, medical device makers, drug testing companies or other industries that have profited from the opioid crisis.  

(Update: This story contains several updates relating to PROP members working as paid expert witnesses and consultants in opioid litigation cases. )

Advocacy and Awareness Should Promote Healing, Not Division

By Mia Maysack, PNN Columnist

June is Migraine and Headache Awareness Month in the United States. This year’s theme is “Advocate for Access.” 

Although I understand the intent behind awareness months, to those of us who truly live with a non-stop condition, they can border on being a tad mundane. Especially when the execution of the awareness itself does very little to propel us forward in any meaningful way.

I live with deeply rooted and untreatable nerve damage from an incurable traumatic brain injury. Bacterial meningitis almost claimed my life as a child. My brain swelled up and still feels pained and swollen even now -- the very definition of intractable pain.  Because migraines are literally my each and every day reality, I'm sick and tired of focusing on or talking about them. 

From what I've witnessed, awareness campaigns are often a repetition of the same conversations, among the same people and within the same circles. We as "migraineurs" don't need to continuously hear about what we already know. In my opinion, it's an unnecessary use of precious energy and the impact doesn't go as far as it could. 

The "pain community" generally seems less of a community and more like a clique -- a repeated line up of only certain people’s voices being heard and a select few being invited to participate in events.  

It gets even worse than that:  I recall emerging onto the pain scene out of an absolute last resort. I jumped head first into involvement with every organization I could find and joined several support groups out of sheer desperation. One day, a routine migraine treatment with Botox went horribly awry -- to the point I still deal with the repercussions to this day. 

I immediately logged on to share this experience, not in an attempt to scare anyone but to raise awareness and hopefully assist in others not encountering the same thing I did. I hoped for some compassionate empathy but what I received was the exact opposite. 

I was torn to shreds online by keyboard warriors claiming not to feel well enough to physically function, but clearly energized to the point of dragging me down. Before I was given a chance to clarify or further explain, I was muted by administrators. This felt violent, uncalled for and oppressive. I was bullied and shunned at a point in time I couldn’t afford to be. 

These very same individuals have the audacity and nerve to schedule days of remembrance for those who could no longer accept or deal with their pain, while simultaneously playing an active role in pushing people over their edge, probably without even caring or realizing it. 

I view it as a sickness, that a person would demand and expect consideration and respect when they don't demonstrate or possess it for others. It's a contest of underlying comparison as well as competitive victimization: I've hurt longer than you, worse than you, my life has been harder than yours, and no one else's life is as bad as mine.  

Is that really a game you want to win? How could one ever expect to feel better with a fixation like that? 

I've come to realize that many who claim to want improvement aren't truly committed to it. It takes work, a retraining of our minds and an entirely new approach to not only how we care for ourselves, but how we care for others.  

This questionable code of conduct is an illness in itself. The resistance to actual improvement is in part what's keeping members of these groups sick -- not to mention the fact that some remain utterly attached to their conditions to the point they're unsure of any identity outside of them. If those they so faithfully follow were truly interested in the well-being of their devoted followers, they'd be attempting to shine a light on the darkness as opposed to benefiting or profiting from it. 

I remained quiet on this for a long time, but one thing about my advocacy is that it’s real. Some people love that and others hate it. I’m not afraid to burn bridges, especially the ones that I built. In case you haven’t noticed, the whole world is hurting and the healing of our planet is what matters. Not just you and your cause.   

Mia Maysack lives with chronic migraine, cluster headache and fibromyalgia. Mia is the founder of Keepin’ Our Heads Up, a Facebook advocacy and support group, and Peace & Love, a wellness and life coaching practice for the chronically ill. 

Ice Packs and Tylenol: Why a New Study on Post-Operative Pain Falls Flat

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

The prescribing of opioids to patients recovering from surgery is a hot topic these days. Fearing that patients may become addicted, a growing number of U.S. hospitals now send their surgery patients home with non-opioid analgesics like Tylenol. According to a recent study, the number of opioid pills prescribed to patients for post-operative pain has been cut in half since 2017.

Reducing the use of opioids has led to complaints from patients that their post-operative pain is poorly treated. It may have even led to a tragic mass shooting. Police say the patient who killed four people – including his surgeon – at a Tulsa hospital this month was angry about “the ongoing pain that came from the surgery” he had 13 days earlier.

A new study by researchers at McGill University in Montreal is likely to add further fuel to the debate over opioids. In a meta-analysis of 47 clinical trials – a study of studies – researchers concluded that opioids don’t work well for post-operative pain, and cause more harm than good.

“The study results indicate that prescribing opioids to manage postoperative pain after discharge is not only unnecessary, but harmful in many surgical settings. These findings… fill a critical gap in knowledge about how pain should be managed at home after surgery,” is how a McGill University press release summarized the findings.

It’s important to read the fine print here. The McGill study, published in The Lancet, has three major limitations that the press release either ignores or downplays.

First, most of the clinical trials that were studied were for dental procedures such as tooth extractions or for minor surgeries conducted in a physician’s office, such as removal of a skin lesion. None of the surgeries involved patients having major operations in a hospital, such as a cesarean section or appendectomy.

Second, much of the data was “largely derived from low-quality trials,” according to the authors.

Third, the primary goal of the study was to assess the pain relief provided by opioids and non-opioid analgesics for one day -- “on day 1 after discharge” – which hardly fills the “critical gap in knowledge” about post-operative pain that McGill claims to have been filled. What about the next 5 or 10 days a patient might need to recover from surgery? What about 13 days?

Despite these glaring limits on the quality of their analysis, McGill researchers came to some broad conclusions.

"We found that prescribing opioids had no impact on patient-reported postoperative pain compared to simple over-the-counter analgesics, but it significantly increased the risk of adverse events, such as nausea, vomiting, constipation, dizziness and drowsiness," said lead author Julio Fiore Jr., PhD, a non-practicing “surgical scientist” at McGill University Health Centre.

"Prescribing opioid-free analgesia may prevent these adverse effects, improve patients' recovery experience, and also help mitigate the opioid crisis by reducing the risk of postoperative opioid misuse, addiction and diversion."

Study Methodology Questioned

But critics of the study’s methodology point out that most patients had only modest pain scores and received very low doses of opioids. The median daily dose of 27 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) is far below cautionary levels recommended by the CDC — and hardly reflective of what a patient might need after a major surgery.

“Most of the surgeries were minor and probably required minimal post-op analgesia,” said Stephen Nadeau, MD, a professor of Neurology at the University of Florida College of Medicine. “In short, the generalization of their findings to all opioid treatment of post-operative pain goes far beyond what the data will support. The reviewers and Lancet editor should have taken them to task about this.”

Over $80,000 in taxpayer funding for the McGill study came from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, which is Canada's federal agency for healthcare research.

“This is typical of the research that we have seen from Canadian researchers that have put Canadians in such a bad state. Their methods and reasons are suspect and the use of data mining continues to come up with false premises,” said Barry Ulmer, Executive Director of the Chronic Pain Association of Canada. “It is shocking and McGill should be ashamed, as should The Lancet. What is also shocking is the Canadian government continues to fund many of these over the wall studies.”

In a preview of the McGill study published in 2020, Fiore and his colleagues said they would exclude from their analysis any studies that evaluated the effectiveness of analgesia for chronic postoperative pain. In other words, they excluded studies of pain relievers that had outcomes running counter to their narrative. If a surgery patient developed chronic pain after their acute pain was only treated with Tylenol, they didn’t want to hear about it.   

"The quality of the selected studies was variable, and none of them addressed non-opioid analgesia during discharge from major or major-complex surgery," acknowledged co-author Charbel El-Kefraoui, a non-practicing “research trainee” at McGill University. "It will therefore be important to conduct studies on different surgical procedures and on different postoperative pain management regimens, including pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions like expectation setting, relaxation and ice packs."

Good luck with that. Ice packs and Tylenol are probably a good way to recover from a toothache, which is basically what the McGill study looked at. They are not a good way to treat acute pain from a major surgery. Or a way to avoid future tragedies like the one in Tulsa.

Low-Dose Cannabis Inhaler Effective in Treating Chronic Pain

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Low-doses of medical cannabis delivered through an inhaler significantly reduced pain in patients with neuropathy, back pain and other chronic pain conditions, according to a new study.

Researchers assessed the efficacy of vaporized cannabis in 138 pain patients using the Syqe Inhaler, a pocket-sized device that delivers microdoses of aerosolized cannabis. The study was funded and conducted by Syqe Medical, a medical technology company in Israel that makes the inhaler.

Unlike smoking or traditional vaping, the Syqe inhaler heats the cannabis to a temperature below combustion and uses airflow controls to deliver precise doses of cannabis to the patient's lungs in less than 2 seconds. The mean dose in the study was 1.5 mg of aerosolized delta-9-THC, a fraction of what a typical cannabis user would get from a joint or vaporizer.

Participants in the study used the inhaler up to several times a day, depending on need, and were followed for up to a year.

The study findings, published in the journal Pain Reports, show that pain levels fell from an average of 7.3 (on a zero to 10 pain scale) to 5.5 after 120 days – a reduction of nearly 23 percent. For patients in severe pain, pain levels dropped over 28 percent.

Most participants also reported significant improvement in their quality of life, with 92% saying their lives were “better” or “much better.”  

Of the 43 patients who were using opioid pain medication at the start of the study, 58% reported using lower doses after initiating treatment with the inhaler.

Adverse events, such as dizziness and headache, were minor and usually lasted only a few minutes. About 17% of patients reported no decrease in pain intensity and 7% reported more pain.

SYQE MEDICAL IMAGE

“Medical cannabis treatment with the Syqe Inhaler demonstrated overall long-term pain reduction, quality of life improvement, and opioid-sparing effect in a cohort of patients with chronic pain, using just a fraction of the amount of MC (medical cannabis) compared with other modes of delivery by inhalation,” researchers reported.

“These outcomes were accompanied by a lower rate of AEs (adverse events) and almost no AE reports during a long-term steady-state follow-up. Additional follow-up in a larger population is warranted to corroborate our findings.”

The Syqe Inhaler is currently only available in Israel and Australia. The company said in an email that it plans to launch the device in Canada and New Zealand in the coming months. No timetable was offered on its availability in the United States.

“We believe it is our responsibility to reduce the pain and suffering of as many patients as possible in the fastest possible way, and we are determined to make medical cannabis treatment a standard of care utilizing advanced technologies,” said Sharon Cohen of Syqe’s Customer Experience Team.

Walking Reduces Pain From Knee Osteoarthritis

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

It may seem counterintuitive, but a new study suggests that walking may be the best medicine to reduce knee pain from osteoarthritis.

Nearly 40 percent of Americans over the age of 45 have some degree of knee osteoarthritis, a progressive joint disorder caused by inflammation of soft tissue, which leads to thinning of cartilage and joint damage. Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is not to be taken lightly, as studies have found that it is strongly associated with early death, high blood pressure, diabetes, elevated cholesterol and cardiovascular disease, particularly for women.

Moderate exercise like walking may help prevent all of those health problems.

In a multi-year study of 1,212 people over the age of 50, researchers at Baylor College of Medicine found that participants who walked for exercise at least 10 times had 40% less risk of developing frequent knee pain than non-walkers.

“Until this finding, there has been a lack of credible treatments that provide benefit for both limiting damage and pain in osteoarthritis,” said Grace Hsiao-Wei Lo, MD, assistant professor of Immunology, Allergy and Rheumatology at Baylor and lead author of the study published in Arthritis & Rheumatology.

“These findings are particularly useful for people who have radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis but don’t have pain every day in their knees,” Lo explained in a press release. “This study supports the possibility that walking for exercise can help to prevent the onset of daily knee pain.  It might also slow down the worsening of damage inside the joint from osteoarthritis.”  

Lo says walking for exercise has other health benefits, such as improved cardiovascular health and decreased risk of obesity, diabetes and even some cancers. Walking is also a free activity with minimal side effects.

“People diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis should walk for exercise, particularly if they do not have daily knee pain,” says Lo, who is chief of rheumatology at the Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center in Houston. "If you already have daily knee pain, there still might be a benefit, especially if you have the kind of arthritis where your knees are bow-legged.”

Avoiding Opioids During Surgery May Harm Patients

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Many U.S. hospitals have adopted policies that reduce or even eliminate the use of opioids during surgery, with the goal of lowering the risk of a patient later becoming addicted. That has resulted in greater use of spinal anesthesia as a substitute for general anesthesia.

During spinal anesthesia, non-opioid medications are used to numb the lower part of the body through an injection into the spinal column. During general anesthesia, a combination of opioids and other analgesics are administered intravenously or through a breathing tube to sedate patients.

But a large new study suggests that spinal anesthesia may actually increase the use of prescription opioids – at least when it comes to hip fracture surgeries.

In an analysis of 1,600 patients who had surgery to repair hip fractures, researchers at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine found that patients who received spinal anesthesia reported more pain in the 24 hours after surgery than those who receive general anesthesia. They were also more likely to be using prescription opioids 60 days after surgery.

“In our study, patients who got spinal anesthesia did get fewer opioids in the operating room, but they ended up having more pain, and more prescription pain medication use after surgery,” said lead author Mark Neuman, MD, an associate professor of Anesthesiology and past chair of the Penn Medicine Opioid Task Force.

“While our study can’t determine conclusively whether this was due to the spinal anesthesia itself or the fact that fewer opioids were given up front, this is a result that should make people examine some of the assumptions informing current care pathways.”

The study findings, published this week in The Annals of Internal Medicine, show patients had their worst pain the day after surgery. Spinal anesthesia patients rated their pain an average of 7.9 (on a zero to 10 pain scale), slightly higher than the average of 7.6 reported by those under general anesthesia.

Researchers say 25 percent of patients in the spinal anesthesia group were using prescription opioids 60 days after surgery, compared to 18.8 percent of patients in the general anesthesia group. There were no significant differences in prescription pain medicine use after six and 12 months, but Neuman is wary of what he saw.

“Even though the 180- and 365-day findings are not statistically significant, the 60-day finding is still concerning, since there could be medication-related harms like respiratory depression or over-sedation that could still occur over the short term,” Neuman said.

Neuman and his colleagues found no significant differences in patient satisfaction, pain levels or mental health status after 60, 180 or 365 days between the spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia groups.

More than 250,000 older Americans suffer hip fractures every year and nearly all are repaired through surgery. In the past, most would receive general anesthesia, but in recent years the use of spinal anesthesia has increased significantly, due in part to the belief by some anesthesiologists that it was safer for frail, older patients.  

Elimination of Opioids Has “Unintended Safety Risks’

There is a growing reluctance on the part of surgeons to eliminate the use of opioid anesthesia or to allow patients to opt out of opioids during surgery.

In an op/ed recently published in The Conversation, three physicians at the University of Michigan Medical School called opioid medication “an essential tool in the operating room.”  

“Opioids stand out among the typical sedatives and anesthetics used in the operating room by significantly reducing the amount of other drugs needed to achieve pain relief, sedation and loss of consciousness,” wrote Drs. Mark Bicket, Jennifer Waljee and Paul Hilliard. 

“Whether or not patients receive opioids during surgery doesn’t affect how likely they are to continue using opioids or receive an opioid prescription afterward. We believe that wholesale elimination of opioids without considering the unique setting of the operating room may lead to unintended safety risks for patients. A more nuanced care plan that relies on reduced amounts of opioids could set patients up for a faster recovery with fewer side effects and better outcomes after surgery.”  

Seven states currently allow patients to sign non-opioid directives telling their physicians not to treat them with opioids. Congress is considering bills in the House and Senate that would allow patients to make similar directives nationwide. Although both bills allow providers to override a patient’s directive in special circumstances, Bicket, Waljee and Hilliard are concerned the directives will lead to unsafe care.

“We have seen medical practice shift from embracing opioids to eliminating them altogether. We believe that opioids serve an essential tool in the operating room for many patients, and avoiding them for certain cases can make it difficult if not impossible to avoid harming patients,” they wrote.

Tips to Make Traveling Less Painful

By Victoria Reed, PNN Columnist

Now that summer is right around the corner, many people like to take a vacation to relax and enjoy the nice summer weather. Summer is my favorite season because I live in northeast Ohio, where the winters can be very cold and snowy. As someone who lives with chronic pain, having to go out in the blistering cold and navigate snow covered roads can make life even harder.

Recently I took a flight to California to attend a family member’s college graduation. It was a fairly long trip, lasting more than five hours. I’ve made trips to California from Ohio many times over the course of several decades. But over the years, as the comfort of riding on airplanes has diminished and as my back, joints and muscles have gotten sorer, the flight turned out to be less than pleasant. 

People in pain often have more to carry than the average person, and diabetics like me need to bring more medical supplies. I try to keep my carry-on backpack light, especially since rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has ravaged my shoulders, which frequently hurt.

Of course, I want to be comfortable when flying, so I regularly pack things such as a neck pillow and a blanket or two. In addition, I must bring snacks, prescription medications, a blood glucose testing kit, a small portable cooler and ice pack for my insulin, several insulin pens, and wrist braces for the inevitable in-flight RA flare. Add to that the standard personal items that I usually carry in my purse. I also like to bring my iPad (with noise canceling headphones) for entertainment.

Because of these necessities (and the not-so-necessary iPad), the backpack was quite heavy. By the time I arrived at my rental home-away-from-home with my dog, I was having a full-blown flare that involved joint pain, muscle pain and severe fatigue. 

I still needed to get some groceries, and after doing that and settling comfortably in bed, a sobering thought came to me: I can’t do this alone anymore.

The fact is, it has become too hard and exhausting. I love traveling, but airline travel is not what it was years ago. It used to be exciting to get on a plane, settle in a window seat and experience the beauty of being above the clouds and watching the mountains below them. But now airplanes are packed so tightly that there’s no room to be comfortable.  I try to book an aisle seat so that I have room to at least stretch my legs and get up to use the restroom without disturbing anyone.

Regardless, I would like to continue traveling because I love going to new places and exploring the beautiful United States. When the pandemic first became a thing, my husband and I purchased a camper, and we began taking trips to national and state parks with our dogs. It quickly became our preferred way of travel.

Because airline travel can be especially stressful for those of us with chronic illness, I recommend traveling by car or RV (if you can afford one). It is so much easier when you have everything you need in one place and are able to stop and stretch when you need to.

Also, if you need to take medications during your trip, they are easier to access than trying to get into your bag in an overhead bin or struggling to reach under the cramped airline seat. Road travel is also the best way for your pets to travel. Pets can be a great source of comfort to those suffering with pain.

However, if you must travel by airplane or just prefer to, there are things you can do to make it more comfortable. I recommend bringing items such as a blanket and a travel pillow. Wear comfortable shoes that can easily be taken off during the security process. Bring along a hoodie or sweater, as the plane tends to get chilly during the flight.

If you have severe mobility issues, arrange to have a wheelchair waiting at the airport or use one of the transport carts to get you to your gate. Pack some healthy snacks, as the ones they serve during the flight are very minimal and not very healthy. If you are a diabetic, pack some candy for those possible blood sugar lows. That way you don’t have to wait for the flight attendant with the drink cart containing sugary drinks.

If you have low back issues, bring an additional light banket to roll up and place behind your back. That could make a world of difference in your comfort level.

If you are traveling onboard with a pet, try to have a companion with you to assist. Having to carry the pet increases the load you already have to manage, and you lose the under-seat space where your purse or backpack is placed. Since many people bring their roller bags onboard, instead of checking them, trying to find overhead space for your personal bag is…well, trying!

Traveling these days can be a challenging experience, but it’s even more so for chronic pain sufferers. Taking a nice vacation or a weekend trip somewhere (if you can afford to) can be just what you need to relax, rejuvenate, boost your mood, and be a distraction from daily pain. With a little advanced planning, you can prevent it from becoming a miserable experience.

Victoria Reed lives in Cleveland, Ohio. She suffers from endometriosis, fibromyalgia, degenerative disc disease and rheumatoid arthritis. 

Opioid Tapering Raises Risk of Overdose and Mental Health Crisis

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Tapering patients to lower doses of opioid pain medication significantly raises the risk of opioid withdrawal, drug overdose and a mental health crisis such as depression, anxiety or suicide attempt, according to a large new study. For most patients, the risk remains elevated up to two years after their doses were reduced.

Opioid prescribing has fallen dramatically in the United States over the past decade, particularly after the release of the CDC’s controversial opioid guideline in 2016. Although millions of patients were affected, few efforts were made to study patient outcomes or what happens to those who have their opioid doses reduced or even stopped.

To address this knowledge gap, researchers at the University of California Davis School of Medicine analyzed health data for over 19,300 patients on long-term opioid therapy who had their doses reduced by at least 15 percent. In addition to medical and pharmacy claims, researchers looked at emergency room visits and hospital admissions for overdose, withdrawal or mental health crisis, both before and after tapering.

"We used an innovative observational study design to understand the patients' experience before and after opioid dose reduction. We compared outcome rates in pre- and post-taper periods with patients serving as their own controls," said co-author Daniel Tancredi, PhD, a pediatrics professor at UC Davis Health.

"While patients may struggle during the early tapering period, we reasoned that many may stabilize with longer-term follow-up and have lower rates of overdose and mental health crisis once a lower opioid dose is achieved," said lead author Joshua Fenton, MD, professor and vice chair of research at UC Davis School of Medicine.

But Fenton and his colleagues found patients continued to struggle long after their doses were cut. Their findings, published in JAMA Network Open, show a 57% increase in overdose or withdrawal incidents and a 52% increase in mental health crises 12 to 24 months after doses were lowered.

For every 100 patients during pre-tapering, there was an average of 3.5 overdose or withdrawal events and 3 mental health crises. After tapering, there were 5.4 overdose/withdrawal events and 4.4 mental health crises for every 100 patients. The risks associated with tapering were greatest in patients with the highest doses.

"Our findings suggest that, for most tapering patients, elevated risks of overdose and mental health crisis persist for up to two years after taper initiation," said Fenton. "We hope this work will inform a more cautious approach to decisions around opioid dose tapering."

An earlier study at UC Davis found that tapered patients were 68% more likely to be treated at a hospital for opioid withdrawal, overdose or alcohol intoxication, and were twice as likely to have a mental health crisis.

‘I Was Cut Off Cold Turkey’

The FDA warned in 2019 that rapid tapering or abrupt discontinuation was causing serious harm to patients. The CDC Director also pledged that year to evaluate the impact of the agency’s opioid guideline on patients and to “clarify its recommendations.”

Three years later, not a word of the CDC guideline has changed and the agency is slow walking efforts to revise it. A revised guideline draft, which cautions doctors to avoid rapid tapering or discontinuation, is not expected to be finalized until late this year. In the meantime, many doctors continue to taper patients – even those who’ve taken opioids safely and responsibly for years.

“Yesterday, I was cut off of one of my opioid medications, cold turkey. I've been given one last 30-day supply of the other, after 19 years of chronic pain treatment with opioid medication. I am bedridden,” a patient told us in a recent PNN survey on the impact of the 2016 guideline.

“Currently my pain management doctor is tapering everyone from schedule II (opioid) medications, even with years of good results and no side effects. This is dangerous when people are dealing with real pain,” said another patient.

“Before the guidelines, my pain was controlled with fentanyl patches and Vicodin for breakthrough pain. I was able to work, care for my home and family. That's all been taken away and now I spend my time either in bed or on my couch, in pain. Tapering down was 7 months of hell in my bedroom. It was cruel and unnecessary to take away medicine that allowed me to enjoy and participate in my life,” another patient wrote.

In an editorial also published in JAMA Network Open, two University of Alabama at Birmingham researchers who are studying the role of tapering in patient suicides urged doctors to be more cautious.

“Our view is that opioid dose reduction is likely to offer benefit for some, while harming others. The harms may include worsening pain, distress, or death,” wrote Stefan Kertesz, MD, and Allyson Varley, PhD. “Given this uncertain balance of harm and benefit, it would be wise for health systems to stop promoting this change to care. A policy of tapering all patients to doses lower than a specified threshold cannot be supported from available evidence.”

Kertesz and Varley are currently recruiting family and friends of patients who died by suicide to participate in a pilot study about the impact of opioid tapering on their loved ones. To participate in their study, click here to take an online survey or call 1-866-283-7223.

FTC Sues Footwear Company Over Pain Relief Claims

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission has filed a lawsuit against a California footwear company, alleging it makes false claims that its shoes can relieve knee, back and foot pain. It’s the latest salvo in a long-running legal battle between the FTC and the Gravity Defyer Medical Technology Corporation.

According to the FTC complaint, Gravity Defyer and its owner, Alexander Elnekaveh, violated a 2001 order barring him from using deceptive advertising that makes unsupported scientific claims. The FTC says the company’s ads target people aged 55 and older, telling them its “pain defying footwear” made with “hybrid VersoShock technology” can relieve suffering from arthritis, joint pain, plantar fasciitis and heel spurs.

“Ignoring a prior Commission order, Gravity Defyer and its owner used false pain-relief claims to target older Americans and undercut honest competitors,” Samuel Levine, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, said in a statement. “Health-based claims require science-based proof, and faking it by misusing studies and customer reviews breaks the law.”

The 2001 FTC order stems from another company operated by Elnekave, which sold a magnetic fuel-line device that allegedly could reduce gasoline consumption by as much as 27 percent. The FTC says those claims were false and misleading.

Gravity Defyer sells an expensive line of athletic shoes, casual shoes, dress shoes, hiking shoes, boots and sandals for men and women.

They range in price from $140 for a pair of sandals to $235 for work boots.

The company sells the shoes on its website, Amazon and at retailers around the country, including The Walking Company, Hammacher Schlemmer, and Shoe City. It advertises its products on Arthritis Today and WebMD, as well as numerous other publications and websites.

Asked to comment on the FTC complaint, the company sent a statement to PNN claiming that its First Amendment right to free speech was being violated.

GRAVITY DEFYER AD

“Gravity Defyer apprised the FTC of the obvious logical flaws in its stance – and that its stance violates Gravity Defyer’s First Amendment right to disseminate, and consumers’ right to receive, truthful, non-misleading scientific information. The FTC was unrelenting in its strange position,” the company said.

In April, Gravity Defyer filed a lawsuit of its own against the FTC. Much of it hinges on a small 2017 study that the company has long used to justify its pain-relieving claims. The study, recently published the Journal of the American Podiatric Association, found that Gravity Defyer’s “shock-absorbing sole” reduces knee pain an average of 85 percent, significantly better than traditional soles.

The FTC says the study has “substantial flaws” because of its small size (52 participants) and duration (5 weeks), and because it relied on participants’ self-reported pain levels.

“It was also only designed to measure knee pain. Thus, the study was not sufficient to determine the effects of wearing Gravity Defyer’s footwear on knee, back, ankle or foot pain, or pain associated with the specific conditions claimed,” the FTC said.

The Commission, which voted 4-0 to file the complaint, is seeking an order permanently barring Gravity Defyer and Elnekaveh from making misleading or deceptive pain-relief claims, as well as civil penalties.

Critics Challenge Study That Found Little Evidence to Support Use of Cannabis

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Medical marijuana advocates are challenging the findings of a new study that found little clinical evidence to support the use of cannabis in treating chronic pain.

“The findings appear out of step with the real-world experience of millions of patients who have come to rely on cannabis for pain management,” said Paul Armentano, Deputy Director of NORML.

The federally-funded systematic review – essentially a study of studies – was conducted by researchers at Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), who analyzed over 3,000 cannabis studies. They could find only 25 studies that met their criteria for review. Only placebo controlled clinical trials or observational studies lasting at least four weeks were included. The rest were deemed to be poor quality or flawed in some way.

“In general, the limited amount of evidence surprised all of us,” said lead author Marian McDonagh, PharmD, professor of medical informatics and clinical epidemiology in the OHSU School of Medicine. “With so much buzz around cannabis-related products, and the easy availability of recreational and medical marijuana in many states, consumers and patients might assume there would be more evidence about the benefits and side effects.”

‘Biased Findings’

Most of the 25 cannabis studies that met OHSU’s criteria for review were considered biased in some way — 30% of the clinical trials were considered to have “high risk of bias” and half had “medium risk of bias.”  Most of the observational studies were also considered biased.

Despite the limited evidence, the OHSU research team came to some sweeping conclusions. Their study, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, found no evidence to support the use of cannabidiol (CBD) or cannabis leaves, buds and flowers in treating pain. Only synthetic cannabis products rich in tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) were found to provide short-term relief from neuropathic pain.

Curiously, the OHSU researchers included in their review studies that evaluated the effectiveness of dronabinol and nabilone, two cannabis-based medications that are only FDA-approved to treat nausea, vomiting and weight loss. They are not formulated to treat chronic pain. Similarly, another study looked at the effectiveness of a cannabis extract in treating muscle stiffness (spasticity) caused by multiple sclerosis.

“It would appear that authors' relatively narrow focus and emphasis on both synthetic cannabis formulations (which historically have not demonstrated similar efficacy to whole-plant cannabis) as well as upon extracts that were initially designed to target medical ailments other than pain management may have biased these findings,” Armentano said in an email to PNN. 

“Numerous controlled trials involving whole-plant cannabis and reviews of said trials have determined that there exists substantial evidence that cannabis is safe and effective in pain management, particularly for neuropathy.” 

Armentano said nearly two-thirds of people enrolled in state-run medical cannabis programs registered for the treatment of chronic pain.

“Controlled studies have further indicated that cannabinoids can act synergistically with opioids, resulting in patients requiring lower doses to achieve relief. This is likely why we now have dozens of studies finding that pain patients taking opioids who initiate medical cannabis use frequently reduce or eliminate their opioid use over time,” Armentanohe said.

More Studies Needed

The OHSU researchers say more high-quality studies are needed on the safety and efficacy of cannabis products, which are largely unregulated by the FDA.

“Cannabis products vary quite a bit in terms of their chemical composition, and this could have important effects in terms of benefits and harm to patients,” co-author Roger Chou, MD, director of OHSU’s Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center said in a press release. “That makes it tough for patients and clinicians, since the evidence for one cannabis-based product may not be the same for another.”

Chou is a controversial figure in the pain community. A prolific researcher and frequent critic of opioid prescribing, Chou co-authored the CDC’s controversial 2016 opioid guideline. Although he has acknowledged conflicts of interest, Chou remains as one of the co-authors of a revised CDC guideline, which is expected to be released later this year.

The cannabis findings are similar to those in another OHSU review, which found no clinical evidence to support the use of kratom, an herbal supplement used by millions of Americans to relieve pain, anxiety, depression and other medical conditions.     

The studies on cannabis, kratom and other plant-based treatments are potentially worth up to $1.4 million for OHSU, a public research university that the federal government often turns to for medical research. According to the website GovTribe, in the last five years OHSU has been awarded nearly $2 billion in federal research grants, much of it coming from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).

Injectable Gel Shows Promise as Treatment for Back Pain

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

An experimental gel shows promise as a treatment for low back pain caused by degenerative disc disease (DDD), according to the results of a small study being presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Interventional Radiology in Boston.

Hydrogels have been used for years to treat DDD, but this is the first time that Hydrafil – an injectable gel developed by ReGelTec – has been tested on humans.

Hydrafil was injected into the discs of 20 people in Colombia with chronic DDD, who had average pain levels of 7.1 on a 10-point pain scale. None of the participants had found more than temporary, mild relief from treatments such as rest, analgesics, physical therapy and back braces.

“We really have no good treatments for degenerative disc disease, aside from conservative care,” said lead investigator Douglas Beall, MD, a medical advisor to ReGelTec and chief of radiology services at Clinical Radiology of Oklahoma.

“Surgery is statistically no more effective than conservative care and can potentially make things worse; nerve ablation is appropriate for only a few patients; and existing hydrogels are inserted through an incision as a soft solid, which can pop out of place if you’re not highly skilled in placing it.”

Because Hydrafil is injectable, it requires no incision and is minimally invasive, although patients are sedated for the procedure. Researchers heat the gel to become a thick liquid and then use a 17-gauge needle to inject it directly into the affected discs, using fluoroscopic imaging to guide them. The gel fills in cracks and tears in the disc, and then hardens, restoring the disc’s structural integrity. The procedure takes about 30 minutes.

This promotional video by ReGelTec demonstrates how Hydrafil works:

Six months after the injection, all 20 participants in the study reported significantly less low back pain, with their pain levels declining to an average of 2.0 on the 10-point pain scale. They also reported significantly better physical function.

“If these findings are confirmed in further research, this procedure may be a very promising treatment for chronic low back pain in those who’ve found insufficient relief from conservative care,” said Beall. “The gel is easy to administer, requires no open surgery, and is an easy procedure for the patient.”

In 2020, Hydrafil received the FDA’s breakthrough device designation, which allows for an expedited review of an experimental product when there is evidence it provides more effective treatment than current options.

ReGelTec is currently recruiting 50 people with DDD in Canada for a new clinical trial of Hydrafil.

Degenerative disc disease is one of the leading causes of chronic low back pain. Healthy discs cushion the spine’s vertebrae, facilitating movement and flexibility. But with activity and normal aging, discs can wear out and cause the bones of the spine to rub together and pinch nerves, causing pain and numbness. By age 60, most people have at least some disc degeneration in their spines.

Should Opioid Prescriptions Have an Expiration Date?

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Almost every food item you buy in a grocery store has an expiration date. Milk, bread and other perishable items have a “use by” or “sell by” date a few weeks into the future, while a can of beans may have a “best by” date that could be years away.

Should prescriptions for opioids and other controlled substances also have expiration dates? A date when they are no longer valid and can’t be filled?

That’s the premise behind a recent study in JAMA Network Open that looked at over 20 million opioid prescriptions written by U.S. dentists and surgeons in 2019. These were prescriptions primarily intended for short-term acute pain caused by operations or dental procedures.

Over 194,000 of the prescriptions (0.9%) were filled by a pharmacy 30 days or more after they were written – a sign they may have been used for something besides pain from a wisdom tooth extraction.

“Our findings suggest that some patients use opioids from surgeons and dentists for a reason or during a time frame other than intended by the prescriber,” said lead author Kao-Ping Chua, MD, a pediatrician at the University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.  “These are both forms of prescription opioid misuse, which in turn is a strong risk factor for opioid overdose.”

A misuse rate of about 1% for surgeons and dentists is low, but Chua and his colleagues found the delayed filling of prescriptions was even more common for scripts written by other medical specialists, such as internal medicine doctors (5.6%), family medicine practitioners (7.1%) and nurse practitioners (6.3%).  

Most states already limit the time window between writing and filling a prescription for a controlled Schedule II substance like hydrocodone – usually it’s 120 or 180 days. Eight states allow such prescriptions to be filled up to a year later. A few have no limits at all.  

“It’s perplexing that states would allow controlled substance prescriptions to be filled so long after they are written,” said Chua.

In 2019, Minnesota enacted one of the toughest dispensing laws in the nation, requiring all opioid prescriptions to be filled within 30 days. Delayed dispensing declined significantly in Minnesota soon afterward, before the law was repealed in 2020 out of concern it may have “unintended consequences” for chronic pain patients during the Covid-19 pandemic.  

Chua and his colleagues say more uniform laws should be adopted nationwide that limit the time frame for opioid dispensing only when prescriptions are written for acute pain. They also suggest that prescribers can reduce delayed dispensing themselves by including specific instructions for pharmacists not to dispense opioids after a certain time period.

Why Intractable Pain Treatment Requires a Stimulant

By Dr. Forest Tennant, PNN Columnist

In 1896, Dr. Henry Snow was the chief cancer surgeon at the Royal Brompton Hospital in London. He recognized and agonized over the immense pain and suffering of his patients when they developed constant pain and approached their end of life.

Dr. Snow wanted to relieve their suffering, so he administered the drugs that were available one at a time: morphine, cocaine and alcohol. With each he managed to get some pain relief, but didn’t obtain the relief he wanted and patients were still suffering. Not to be deterred, he made a profound discovery.

Dr. Snow mixed morphine and cocaine in liquid alcohol and administered the solution to his patients. Then he found formidable and humane pain relief. This three-drug mixture gave rise to the concept of “synergy of constituents,” which means that the simultaneous administration of multiple pain-relieving drugs added up to more than each one alone. In other words, two and two equaled six rather than four. 

The success of Dr. Snow’s discovery spread rapidly to other hospitals and countries, and became known as the “Brompton cocktail.” In France and elsewhere, physicians discovered they could add an antihistamine, antipsychotic or cannabis oil to the mixture and get even more pain relief.  

The Brompton cocktail was used until the 1970’s, when it gave way to the convenience of opioid tablets, capsules and injections, rather than the time and cost of making a liquid that contained multiple drugs. 

The Amphetamine Discovery 

Fortunately, after the demise of the Brompton cocktail, a handful of researchers weren’t about to forget the “synergy of constituents” and the pain-relieving potency of stimulants like cocaine. An example of the pain-relieving capability of stimulants is caffeine, which in the 1960’s was added to a variety of pain relievers such as aspirin and codeine to obtain synergy. 

Amphetamine was discovered in the 1930’s and promoted as “Benzedrine” to stay awake while driving. Because amphetamine produced alertness, it became known as a stimulant. Clinical reports began to surface in the 1940’s that amphetamine and its derivatives also helped depression, weight loss, mental alertness, hyperactivity and attention span. They soon began to be marketed and labeled for those conditions.  

Clinical studies on amphetamine derivatives for pain relief were finally started in the 1980’s, and they clearly showed that they provided a great deal of pain relief.  

By the time the last century folded, a core of pain researchers knew that not only cocaine but amphetamine derivatives such as methylphenidate and phentermine relieved pain. What they didn’t know was why. This answer was to come 15-20 years later. 

Stimulants Initially Rejected 

I became quite excited about the clinical trials that showed stimulants relieved pain, and in the late 1990’s gave a group of intractable pain patients the weak stimulant and weight loss drug phentermine, in combination with clonidine. The opioid dosages for these patients dropped 40 to 50 percent within six weeks and they got even better pain relief.

I presented my findings to colleagues at some national professional meetings. Much to my surprise, I was summarily informed that the new long-acting opioid formulations of the fentanyl patch (Duragesic), oxycodone (Oxycontin), morphine (MS Contin) and the implanted intrathecal (spine) opioid pump eliminated any need for stimulants or the concept of “synergy of constituents.”

By the turn of the century, the use of these new long-acting opioids and implanted opioid pumps became the standard of the day. Stimulants and their synergy were essentially forgotten, and they were rarely used for intractable pain again until about 2010. 

The Rebirth of Synergy 

After the year 2000, I don’t recall ever being referred an intractable pain patient who had not already been started on one of the long-acting opioids and/or an implanted opioid pump. They were referred to me simply because they were not getting adequate pain relief. Almost every one of these patients had found that their opioids quit working well, regardless of dosage or even if a second or third opioid was added to the mix.  

Somewhat out of desperation, about 12 years ago I recalled Dr. Snow, the Brompton cocktail and the “synergy of constituents.” I also remembered my study on phentermine and clonidine, so I started giving patients on opioids who were doing poorly my favorite stimulant, phentermine, or occasionally methylphenidate (Ritalin).  

Later the narcolepsy drug modafinil (Provigil) and a mixture of amphetamine salts (Adderall), came on the market. They too proved to be excellent “synergists” with opioids. I found that every intractable pain patient who received one of these stimulants not only got better pain relief and were either able to “hold the line” or reduce their opioid dosage.  

Phentermine continued to be my favorite stimulant to relieve pain and reduce the use of opioids because it additionally kept weight down and helped the patient keep moving and functional. 

Why Stimulants Work 

Although stimulants have been clinically known to relieve pain since Dr. Snow’s experiments in 1896, researchers didn’t provide us with the biologic “why” until recently. 

In the past decade, some outstanding researchers determined that there are about half a dozen different neurotransmitters in the brain and spinal cord that relieve pain. The three major neurotransmitters are endorphin, dopamine and gamma amino butyric acid (GABA). These neurotransmitters relieve pain by activating trigger points in the central nervous system called receptors. 

These astute researchers also determined that intractable pain may deplete endorphin, dopamine and GABA. Consequently, a substitute drug may have to be administered to obtain adequate pain relief.  

If you have constant, intractable pain, you may likely need the “synergy of constituents,” which will include an opioid, stimulant, and GABA substitute. Popular GABA substitutes include diazepam (Valium), carisoprodol (Soma), pregabalin (Lyrica), gabapentin (Neurontin), clonazepam (Klonopin), topiramate (Topomax) and alcohol. 

Which Patients Should Receive a Stimulant?

Stimulants have well-known abuse and addiction potential, so they should only be given to patients who have a well-documented disease or injury that is known to cause severe intractable pain. The most common diseases in this category are adhesive arachnoiditis, stroke or head trauma, reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD/CRPS), Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, and some autoimmune-collagen disorders.  

In most cases, patients who need a stimulant are clearly debilitated and require some family and caretaker support to function and carry out activities of daily living.  

Intractable pain patients have several dopamine substitutes available: 

• Amphetamine Salts (Adderall)

• Methylphenidate (Ritalin)

• Dextroamphetamine

• Phentermine

• Phendimetrazine

Misunderstood Objections

Many medical practitioners are not yet aware of the new research on stimulants and hesitate to prescribe them, even to needy, legitimate patients. The fear of abuse, diversion or dependence by the intractable pain or palliative care patient, while understandable, should not cause reluctance to prescribe a stimulant to these patients. No intractable pain patient will give away something that works so well.

In addition, the dosage of stimulants for pain relief is considerably lower than the usual level needed for abuse. Only small dosages are clinically needed in most cases and pharmacies today only issue limited quantities. Another safety factor in controlling adverse consequences of stimulants is that the severe intractable pain patient will usually have close family or caretaker support who can safely store and administer stimulants.

There is an unfounded fear of hypertension if a stimulant is prescribed. This is rarely the case, since the pain patient is dopamine deficient. A stimulant drug in an intractable pain patient may actually lower blood pressure since it may be elevated due to pain.

There is the belief that Adderall, Ritalin and some other stimulants are only for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). What is misunderstood is that ADHD is universal among intractable pain patients. Every person with intractable pain has reduced attention span, hypertension and agitation. One could argue that every intractable pain patient should be on a stimulant just for their ADHD. 

Dr. Snow and the Royal Brompton Hospital had the right idea. The severe, intractable pain patient needs an opioid to replace endorphin, a stimulant to replace dopamine, and a substitute for GABA.  

It’s time we bring back the “synergy of constituents” to humanely get better pain relief and simultaneously lower opioid dosages in the intractable pain patient. 

Forest Tennant, MD, DrPH, is retired from clinical practice but continues his studies on the treatment of intractable pain through the Arachnoiditis Research and Education Project. A bibliography on stimulants for intractable pain treatment can be found here  

The Tennant Foundation gives financial support to Pain News Network and sponsors PNN’s Patient Resources section.   

Patient in Tulsa Hospital Shooting Was Angry About Pain Care

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

The gunman who killed four people Wednesday at an Oklahoma hospital recently had back surgery and was angry about his post-operative pain not being treated, according to police and media reports.

Michael Louis shot and killed Dr. Preston Phillips, the surgeon who performed the operation, as well as another doctor, a medical receptionist and a bystander who took his wife to an appointment at Saint Francis Hospital in Tulsa. The 45-year-old Louis fatally shot himself as police closed in.

“What we currently know is that Louis was in pain, Louis expressed that he was in pain and was not getting relief and that was the circumstance surrounding this entire incident,” said Tulsa Police Chief Wendell Franklin. “He blamed Dr. Phillips for the ongoing pain that came from the surgery.”

Phillips was an orthopedic surgeon who specialized in spinal surgery and joint reconstruction. He graduated from Harvard Medical School in 1990.

No details have been released on what type of back surgery Louis had or what kind of pain medication he was given. According to a niece, he suffered from back pain for “a long time.”

“We are aware that he has been experiencing back pain for a long time but [there is] no reason for this senseless act,” the niece told The Daily Beast. “We are a Christian-based family. We have never experienced this before.”

Police say Phillips operated on Louis on May 19. Louis was released from the hospital on May 24, but called “several times over several days complaining of pain and wanted additional treatment,” according to Franklin. Louis had an appointment with Phillips on Tuesday, the day before the shooting, but it’s not clear if any further pain relief was offered to him.

In the days following his surgery, Louis was living in the home of his ex-wife, Dr. Edith Lubin, a family practice physician. Her lawyer released a statement saying Lubin had no knowledge of her former husband possessing a gun or having “any intent of harming anyone.”

“Dr. Lubin is praying for the families of all those affected. She acknowledges everyone’s concerns in understanding what happened, but she is at a loss for an explanation, other than the effect of continuing pain to Mr. Louis during his recovery,” the lawyer said in a statement to a KJRH-TV reporter.

Louis bought a handgun on Sunday and a semiautomatic rifle on Wednesday afternoon, just hours before the shooting. Both weapons were legally purchased, according to police.

Franklin said a letter found on Louis after the shooting “made it clear that he came in with the intent of killing Dr. Phillips and anyone who got in his way.”

Asked whether opioids were involved in Louis’ treatment, Franklin said investigators have only established that he was in pain and that other details about his care were still being investigated, according to The Washington Post.

‘Just a Matter of Time’

In recent years, many U.S. hospitals have stopped or reduced the use of opioids after surgery, fearing patients may become addicted. Non-opioid analgesics and over-the-counter pain relievers such as Tylenol are increasingly being used to treat post-operative pain.

"Out of all the hospital systems in Oklahoma, I have heard the most about the horrible pain treatment at St. Francis,” said Tamera Lynn Stewart, an Oklahoma patient advocate and Policy Director for the P3 Political Action Alliance. “I know so many who have had surgery there and received Tylenol only or who see doctors there that claim they aren’t allowed to prescribe." 

Opioid addiction is actually rare after surgery. Studies have found that less than 1% of patients are still taking opioids a year after major surgery or were later diagnosed with opioid dependence.  

With their pain poorly treated or left untreated, Stewart says some desperate patients in Oklahoma have threatened to kill themselves on the steps of the state capitol to make a statement. The mass shooting at the Tulsa hospital, while tragic, was not unexpected to her. 

“While our hearts are grieving with the families and victims, few in our grassroots communities built to advocate for appropriate treatment of pain without government or third-party interference can say this was completely unexpected. Veterans have committed suicide at VA’s across the country for the same reason,” Stewart told PNN. 

“Most of us knew it was just a matter of time before someone who could no longer bear the unrelenting pain did something more drastic in order to get the attention needed to end the restrictions (on opioids) and begin the much-needed process of swinging the pendulum back to a more neutral position.” 

Long before Tulsa, there were other cases where people in pain resorted to drastic action. In 2017, a man suffering from chronic back pain shot and wounded two people at a Las Vegas pain clinic before taking his own life.   

That same year, an Indiana doctor was fatally shot by a man who was upset because the physician refused to prescribe opioids to his wife, who suffered from chronic pain.