Fake Fentanyl Pills Found in 40 States

By Pat Anson, Editor

Counterfeit painkillers and fake medications made with illicit fentanyl have killed Americans in at least 16 states, according to a new report that found the highly dangerous pills have spread from coast to coast.

“We have documented the spread of counterfeit pills made with illegal fentanyl throughout 40 states. There is documentation that counterfeits made with fentanyl have killed Americans in at least 16 of those states. The other 24 states probably have deaths attributable to counterfeits made with fentanyl, but because of limited awareness of the problem, those deaths may not have been investigated for counterfeit drugs,” said the report by the Partnership for Safe Medicines (PSM) a coalition of pharmacy groups and other healthcare organizations.

The report is based on a review of court records, statements by law enforcement and public health agencies, and news reports.

Fentanyl is 50 to 100 times more potent than morphine. It is legally available in lozenges, patches and other medications to treat severe pain, but in recent years illicit fentanyl has become widely available on the black market, where it is often mixed with heroin or used in the production of counterfeit drugs.

Many addicts looking for a high or pain sufferers looking for relief have no idea what they’re buying. Experts say a single dose of fentanyl as small as two or three milligrams can be fatal.

“Up until now, it’s been difficult to grasp the scope and pervasiveness of the counterfeit drug problem,” said Dr. Marvin Shepherd, chairman of the PSM Board and former director of the Center for Pharmacoeconomic Studies at the University of Texas at Austin’s College of Pharmacy. “We’ve had a number of examples of counterfeit pill seizures and tragic fentanyl-related deaths, but this report paints a picture of a nation under siege from fake and lethal drugs coming across our borders.”

Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Ohio and several states now report they have more people dying from overdoses of illicit fentanyl than from prescription opioids. 

Most of the illicit fentanyl is manufactured in China and smuggled into the U.S. by drug cartels. In August, the Mexican military found over 140 pounds of powdered fentanyl hidden inside a tractor trailer rig at a checkpoint near Yuma, Arizona. The shipment, which had an estimated street value of $1.2 billion, also included nearly 30,000 counterfeit tablets made with fentanyl.

The fake pills are often designed to look like oxycodone or the anti-anxiety drug Xanax, and are hard to distinguish from the real thing.

“They’re relatively cheap (to make) and the profit margin is phenomenal,” said Lisa McElhaney, President of the National Association of Drug Diversion Investigators, during a recent seminar for pain management providers. “You’re talking about such a miniscule amount (of fentanyl). But it has such a heavy potency and purity level that it is fatal.”

McElhaney said the black market in prescription drugs used to be dominated by legally-made medications that were stolen or diverted from medicine cabinets, pharmacies or drug manufacturers. She now believes most of the pills sold on the street are counterfeit.

counterfeit oxycodone pills

“I would say 99% of what we are seeing on the street, bought and sold, is product from China, India, Mexico, or from second or third-hand distributors. It is not pharmaceutical grade, FDA approved fentanyl,” she said.

While the DEA and other law enforcement agencies have been warning of the fentanyl problem for years, federal health officials have been slow to recognize or even address it – focusing instead on limiting the use of opioid pain medication.

For example, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently launched a new marketing campaign, using videos, online advertising, billboards, newspapers and radio ads to raise awareness about the risks of prescription opioids. The campaign completely ignores the role of fentanyl and heroin in the overdose crisis, because the CDC didn't want to risk “diluting” its primary message.

“Specificity is a best practice in communication, and the Rx Awareness campaign messaging focuses on the critical issue of prescription opioids. Given the broad target audience, focusing on prescription opioids avoids diluting the campaign messaging,” the CDC explained.

Politicians are also focused on prescription opioids. Several states have adopted or are considering laws that limit opioid prescriptions for acute pain to only a few days’ supply – a move that President Trump’s opioid commission appears to be considering as a recommendation in its final report.

“This is a prevention measure… to limit the number of drugs that are out there for improper diversion and to make sure that we don’t inadvertently turn people into addicts by giving 30, 60, 90 pills the first time,” said commission chairman Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey, whose state has adopted a five day limit on new opioid prescriptions.

This week the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America -- an organization that represents virtually every major drug maker – told the commission that it would support a 7-day limit on opioid prescriptions for acute pain.  

CVS Defends Rx Opioid Policy

By Pat Anson, Editor

CVS Health has released new details about its plan to limit the dose of opioid pain medication and restrict new prescriptions for acute pain to a 7-day supply.

The new policy, which was announced last week, immediately sparked an online backlash from chronic pain patients, who fear they will no longer be able to refill their opioid prescriptions at CVS or will have to do it weekly.

“It's crazy what's going on. Every week going to doctors and pharmacists paying that extra money. This is a crime on the sick,” wrote Amy in a Facebook post.

“Even for new patients, this doesn't make sense,” wrote Jennifer in another online post. “After surgery some patients need these medications for longer than 7 days. Driving to the doctor to get a new script, then to the pharmacy to get more medication is not conducive to healing.”

“How can they single out medications and refuse when the doctor writes them for 30 days?” wrote Hazel. “Everyone should boycott them, not only for prescriptions but shopping there for anything. This is getting ridiculous!”

Asked to comment on these and other concerns, CVS Health emailed a statement to PNN answering a series of questions we had about its new opioid policy. We were not allowed to interview anyone at CVS directly.

The questions and answers below were edited for clarity:

PNN: Many of your customers with chronic pain believe they'll have to go to a CVS pharmacy four times a month to get their refills. Can you clarify that for them? 

CVS: The seven day quantity limit on opioid prescriptions, going into effect on February 1, 2018 for CVS Caremark's pharmacy benefit management (PBM) clients, applies only to prescriptions written for acute conditions, such as a minor surgery or dental procedure, that generally last only for a short duration. 

We recognize that there are patients with a legitimate need for pain medication, and our approach is carefully designed to ensure that those patients can access their medication in an appropriate manner.  We are dedicated to ensuring our retail and PBM approaches do not negatively affect patients who are in need of their chronic pain medication.   

PNN: What happens when a patient recovering from surgery needs opioid medication for more than 7 days? Do they go back to their doctor and get a new prescription?

CVS: Our program encourages safe and appropriate utilization of opioids by managing utilization in a manner consistent with the Guideline set forward by the CDC.  Our efforts to ensure safe and appropriate opioid use are designed to improve the quality of care and health outcomes for patients.  If a prescriber feels patient care should exceed these limits, the prescriber can request an exception. 

PNN: What about limiting opioid prescriptions to 90mg morphine equivalent (MME) doses? Some pain patients are prescribed more than that.

CVS:  The CDC recommends that clinicians prescribe the lowest effective opioid dose and use caution when prescribing opioids at any dosage.  Further, the Guideline indicates physicians should carefully reassess evidence of individual benefits and risks when considering increasing dosage to ≥50 morphine milligram equivalents (MME)/day, and should avoid increasing dosage to ≥90 MME/day or carefully justify a decision to titrate dosage to ≥90 MME/day. 

We are aligning our standard utilization to these limits for all patients who are not in active cancer treatment, palliative care, or hospice care.  However, if a prescriber feels patient care should exceed these limits, the prescriber can request an exception. 

PNN: You say you are following the CDC guideline, but the guideline is voluntary and only intended for primary care physicians treating chronic pain. You are making them mandatory for all doctors and all patients for all types of pain.

CVS: Given the toll opioid misuse has taken on our country, we believe it is appropriate to align our utilization management of opioids for our members with the Guideline set by the CDC.  Our efforts to ensure safe and appropriate opioid use are designed to improve the quality of care and health outcomes for patients.  Notably, if a prescriber feels patient care should exceed these limits, the prescriber can request an exception. 

PNN: Many patients complain that there's already a tendency by some pharmacists to refuse to fill opioid prescriptions to avoid hassles, extra work, etc. and to send them away without their medication. How will CVS make sure its pharmacists abide by your rules and not invent new ones?

CVS: Our opioid utilization management program will be consistently executed as a coverage determination across all pharmacies in our PBM retail network.  Pharmacists at CVS Pharmacy, or any of the other retail pharmacies in our network, will not be making independent medical judgments about the appropriateness of opioid prescribing or the length of such prescribing. Additionally, the program we have recently announced does not impact prescriptions filled for CVS Pharmacy retail customers who are not covered by the CVS Caremark PBM.   

Our pharmacists are committed to providing the highest level of care for their patients.  At our retail pharmacies, we are also strengthening counseling for patients filling an opioid prescription with a robust safe opioid use education program highlighting opioid safety and the dangers of addiction. 

'Cookie Cutter' Approach to Pain Care

CVS is not the first pharmacy to adopt rules that limit the dispensing of opioids, but it is the first major chain to set a 7-day limit on prescriptions for acute pain. Given recent trends, it is probably not the last.

Several states have already adopted laws that limit opioids to a few days' supply for acute pain. And yesterday a major pharmaceutical organization announced its support for a 7-day limit on new opioid prescriptions.  

Critics say this “cookie cutter” approach to pain care ignores the fact that when acute pain is poorly treated or untreated, it can turn into chronic pain in a matter of months or even weeks.

And chronic pain can worsen or cause other life-threatening health problems, including high blood pressure, stroke, heart attack, depression and suicide ideation.

Each patient is also different. A large new study published this week in JAMA Surgery looked at the different lengths of time patients needed opioid medication while recovering from 8 common surgical procedures.

While a 7-day supply of opioids was adequate for most patients recovering from an appendectomy, hysterectomy, hernia repair and other common surgeries, an analysis of over 215,000 surgery patients found that about 20 percent of them needed at least one refill of their prescription. Orthopedic and neurological procedures were the most likely to require a refill, and Medicare patients were the most likely group to need opioids for more than 7 days after a surgery.

“Although 7-day limits on initial opioid pain medication prescriptions are likely adequate in many settings, and indeed also sufficient for many common general surgery and gynecologic procedures, in the postoperative setting, particularly after many orthopedic and neurosurgical procedures, a 7-day limit may be inappropriately restrictive," wrote lead author Louis Nguyen, MD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School.

But not everyone finds fault in the cookie cutter approach. In an editorial also published in JAMA Surgery, a leading surgeon wrote that “any effort” to reduce the frequency of opioid prescriptions was a good thing.

“Unfortunately, we have reached a point that 100% elimination of pain has become not only the goal but the expectation. If a surgeon allows a patient to expect a pain-free recovery, he or she will see refill requests increase,” wrote Selwyn Rogers, MD, chief of surgery at the University of Chicago Medicine Trauma Center.

“Alternatives to narcotics should be recommended and incorporated as the foundation of pain management. It does not take much time to explain the use of acetaminophen and ibuprofen and then follow up with a stronger option if the pain is not adequately relieved. It is also useful to prepare the patient to expect some discomfort, realize that complete relief of all pain is impossible, and that the cost of trying is not worth it.”

Drug Makers Support 7-Day Limit on Rx Opioids

By Pat Anson, Editor

A leading organization of pharmaceutical companies announced today its support for a 7-day limit on opioid prescriptions for acute pain.  

The announcement -- made during a meeting of President Trump’s opioid commission – marks a significant shift for the industry and is likely to speed up efforts to have limits imposed nationwide on opioid medication for short-term pain.

“PhRMA is announcing for the first time our support to limit the supply of opioids to 7 days for acute pain management. Too often, individuals receive a 30-day supply of opioid medicines for minor treatments for short-term pain,” said Stephen Ubl, President and CEO of PhRMA, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America.  

“Overprescribing and dispensing can lead to patients taking opioids longer than necessary and excess pills falling into the wrong hands.”

PhRMA is a trade organization that represents over 3 dozen pharmaceutical companies, including AstraZeneca, Bayer, Allergan, Bristol-Myer Squibb, Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Pfizer, Teva, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, and Purdue Pharma.

“Our announcement is candidly an unprecedented step for the industry. We’ve always supported physician autonomy and the preservation of the physician-patient relationship, but as you know, given the scope of this (opioid) crisis,we believe this is the right thing to do,” Ubl said.

“I want to thank you and the industry for stepping forward," said commission chairman Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey. “This is a prevention measure… to limit the number of drugs that are out there for improper diversion and to make sure that we don’t inadvertently turn people into addicts by giving 30, 60, 90 pills the first time. And so the fact that the pharmaceutical industry is willing to step up and acknowledge that there is something that needs to be done is an important first step.”

New Jersey, Ohio, New York and several other states have already implemented or are considering laws to limit the number of days opioids can be prescribed and dispensed for acute, short-term pain. This week Florida Gov. Rick Scott announced that he would support legislation for a 3-day limit on opioids for acute pain in his state. Strict conditions would have to be met to get a 7-day supply.   

A bill introduced in the U.S. Senate earlier this year would require doctors nationwide to limit the initial supply of opioids for acute pain to seven days, a prescription that could not be renewed.  The bill by Sen. John McCain and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand was referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee in April, but has gone no further.

CVS Health announced last week that it would limit opioid medication for acute pain to 7 days in all of its pharmacies nationwide, starting February 1.

CVS will also limit opioid doses for both acute and chronic pain to 90mg morphine equivalent units, and patients would be required to try immediate release formulations before using extended release opioids.

‘Moonshot’ Needed for New Pain Treatments

Today’s meeting of President Trump’s opioid commission focused largely on expanding access to addiction treatment and developing new ways of treating chronic pain without the use of opioid medication. During the two-hour meeting, there was hardly any mention of illegal opioids or the scourge of heroin and illicit fentanyl now sweeping the country.

"Our nation needs a moonshot commitment to the development of non-opioid pain treatments. We need new therapies and we need them fast," said Jim Campbell, MD, President of Centrexion Therapeutics. "The abuse of opioids costs lives, but the other equally important issue is the problem of untreated pain. Untreated pain leads to lost work, depression, lack of sleep, social withdrawal and may even lead to suicide."

Commission member Patrick Kennedy, a former congressman in recovery from addiction, said the problems of pain, addiction, depression and suicide are all intertwined, and need better advocacy.

“Clearly, depression is rampant. The opioid crisis was driven by a depression crisis. And while we’re talking about the opioid crisis and overdose deaths, suicide is getting right up there, to the height of the AIDS epidemic itself,” said Kennedy. “Because these illnesses are so stigmatized, the advocacy is really anemic. There’s no one out there shaking the trees as if this were HIV and AIDS, like we saw in those crises.”

To watch a replay of the commission meeting, click here.

FDA Targets Rogue Online Pharmacies

By Pat Anson, Editor

The Food and Drug Administration is cracking down on over 500 online pharmacies that illegally sell potentially dangerous, unapproved versions of prescription drugs, including opioid pain medication, antibiotics and injectable epinephrine products. So far the crackdown doesn’t appear to be very effective, as many of the websites the FDA targeted remain online.

The FDA recently partnered with Interpol and other international law enforcement agencies in a global operation called Pangea X. The goal was to identify the makers and distributors of illegal prescription drugs and shut them down.

“These rogue online pharmacies are often run by sophisticated criminal networks that knowingly and unlawfully distribute illicit drugs, including counterfeit medicines and controlled substances. Consumers go to these websites believing that they are buying safe and effective medications, but they are being deceived and put at risk,” FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, MD, said in a statement.

“The ease with which consumers can purchase opioid products online is especially concerning to me, given the immense public health crisis of addiction facing our country. Some of the websites sold unapproved versions of multiple prescription opioids directly to U.S. consumers. This easy and illegal availability of these controlled substances fuels the misuse and abuse of opioids.”

The FDA sent 13 warning letters to the operators of 401 websites informing them they were illegally selling unapproved prescription drugs.

screen shot from american pharmacy group website

One such letter went to the American Pharmacy Group in Silver Spring, Maryland, warning the company about selling an unapproved combination of hydrocodone and acetaminophen in 10/500mg doses.

The FDA asked drug manufacturers in 2011 to limit the strength of acetaminophen in prescription drugs to 325mg because of the risk of severe liver injury.

“There are currently no approved drug applications… for the hydrocodone products that contain 500 mg of acetaminophen offered for sale on your websites,” the FDA letter warned.  “Offering hydrocodone products for sale on your websites is particularly concerning given the potential for abuse and dependency, especially amid the growing epidemic of opioid abuse in the U.S.”

The FDA letter was dated September 19, 2017. But today a website affiliated with American Pharmacy Group was still selling the hydrocodone/acetaminophen combination in the 10/500mg dose as a “muscle relaxant.” A bottle of 30 pills could be purchased for $269 with 2-5 day delivery.  

In an online chat with “John” the pharmacy manager, I asked if a prescription was needed to get the painkiller.

“No you no need prescription no,” was his reply.

“Really? I don’t need a prescription to get that?” I asked

“No,” he answered again.

John then referred me to a “new” online pharmacy, one that was not on the list of 21 websites the FDA identified as being affiliated with American Pharmacy. It’s apparently easier to put a new website up than it is for federal agents to take an old one down.

In adddition to warning letters, the FDA seized nearly 100 website domain names, such as buyhydrocodoneonline.com, canadian-pharmacy24x7.com and buyklonopin.com.

As part of Pangea X, FDA inspectors also screened packages suspected of containing illegal drugs at international mail facilities (IMFs) in Chicago, Miami and New York. Those screenings resulted in nearly 500 parcels being seized.

“Our work to fight illegal online pharmacies is not over,” said Gottlieb. "We’ve recently tripled the staff we have in the IMFs to improve our ability to inspect packages that are suspected of containing illegal drugs, and we have doubled the number of cybercrime and port of entry special agents for the Office of Criminal Investigations,” Gottlieb said.

Interpol said it seized over $51 million in illicit and counterfeit medications during Operation Pangea X. Over 400 people were arrested worldwide, with 3,584 websites shut down.

ER Patients Less Likely to Use Opioids Long Term

By Pat Anson, Editor

Patients who are prescribed opioid pain medication for the first time in hospital emergency rooms are less likely to become long term opioid users than patients in other settings, according to a large new study by researchers at the Mayo Clinic.

"Our paper lays to rest the notion that emergency physicians are handing out opioids like candy," said lead author Molly Moore Jeffery, PhD, scientific director of the Mayo Clinic Division of Emergency Medicine Research. “Most opioid prescriptions written in the emergency department are for shorter duration, written for lower daily doses and less likely to be for long-acting formulations."

Jeffrey and her colleagues analyzed data for 5.2 million opioid prescriptions filled in emergency rooms from 2009 to 2015.

They found that only 1.1% percent of “opioid naïve” patients with private insurance progressed to long term opioid use. That compares to 2% of patients in non-emergency settings. Long term use was defined as someone getting 10 or more refills or more than a 120 day supply of opioids in a year.

About 3 percent of Medicare beneficiaries used opioids long term after getting them in an ER, with disabled Medicare patients the most likely ER patients to progress to long term use (13.4%).

Only 3.3% of opioid doses for privately insured patients in the ER exceeded 90mg morphine equivalent units (what the CDC considers a high daily dose). That compares to 7.2% of doses in non-emergency settings.  The duration of prescriptions was also lower for ER patients.

"Less than 5 percent of opioid prescriptions from the ER exceeded 7 days, which is much lower than the percentage in non-emergency settings. Further research should explore how we can replicate the success of opioid prescribing in emergency departments in other medical settings," said Jeffery, whose study is published online in the Annals of Emergency Medicine.

The use of opioid medication in hospital emergency rooms has become a contentious issue for both patients and physicians, with many patients complaining that they are profiled and labeled as drug seekers when they seek treatment at an ER for pain.

“I refuse to go to the ER for pain. Unless I feel I'm absolutely dying, I will not go. It isn't worth being made to feel like I'm only ‘putting on a show’ or I'm a junkie just trying to get high,” one pain sufferer told us.

In a survey of over 1,250 pain patients last year by PNN and the International Pain Foundation, 80 percent said they had felt labeled as an addict or drug seeker by hospital staff. Asked if doctors were reluctant to prescribe opioid medication while they were hospitalized, over two-thirds said it happens often or sometimes. To see the complete survey results, click here.

“I had a doctor in an emergency room situation one time during an episode I was having, who actually stood in the open doorway of my room, I was still in the ER, and yelled at me as loud as he could, that he wasn't giving me any pain medicine,” said one patient.

Some hospitals, such as Temple University Hospital in Philadelphia, have adopted guidelines that discourage opioid prescribing to ER patients. The voluntary policy quickly won broad support from Temple’s physicians.

In a survey by the hospital, only 13% of Temple’s ER doctors thought patients with legitimate reasons for opioids were denied appropriate care. A large majority – 84% of the doctors -- did not believe patients were denied appropriate pain relief.

“Emergency physicians have identified themselves as targets for patients who seek opioids for nonmedical purposes, yet it can be difficult for clinicians to distinguish drug seeking behavior from legitimate need,” said Daniel del Portal, MD, Assistant Professor of Clinical Emergency Medicine at the Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University.

CDC Launches New Campaign Against Rx Opioids

By Pat Anson, Editor

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has launched a new awareness campaign to combat the abuse of prescription opioids, a marketing effort driven by surveys and focus groups that completely ignores the increasing role of heroin and illicit fentanyl in the nation’s overdose crisis.

The Rx Awareness campaign uses videos, online advertising, billboards, newspapers and radio ads designed to increase awareness “about the risks of prescription opioids and stop inappropriate use.” The campaign will initially run for 14 weeks in Ohio, Kentucky, Massachusetts, and New Mexico, with a broader release expected as additional states receive funding through CDC programs. No estimate of the cost of the campaign was released.

“The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is committed to using evidence-based methods to communicate targeted messages about the opioid crisis and prevent addiction and misuse in every way we can,” HHS Secretary Tom Price, MD, said in a statement. 

But little "evidence" is actually presented in the Rx Awareness campaign, which primarily uses slogans and emotional, “real-life accounts” of people recovering from opioid addiction or who have lost loved ones to a prescription opioid overdose.

“Prescription opioids can be addictive and dangerous,” a woman says in an online banner ad.

“One prescription can be all it takes to lose everything,” a man says in another ad.

Although addictive behavior typically starts during adolescence, the Rx Awareness campaign is targeting adults aged 25-54 who have used prescription opioids at least once either medically or recreationally.

“We learned that adults between the ages of 45 and 54 had not yet been targeted by a broad-reaching campaign. This information was reinforced by surveillance data indicating that the population with the highest fatality rate from opioid overdoses was non-Hispanic white adults ages 45–54,” the CDC said in an unusually detailed explanation of the marketing research behind the campaign.

“We also found a need for communication efforts to deliver primary prevention messages to younger audiences ages 25–35, who are less likely to experience chronic pain but may be exposed to opioids for other reasons, such as having a sports injury or undergoing a dental procedure.”

The four states initially being targeted all have soaring rates of opioid overdoses, but in recent years most of the deaths have been linked to heroin and illicit fentanyl, not prescription opioids. 

The latest report from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health, for example, shows prescription opioids were involved in only 15 percent of opioid-related overdose deaths in the state during the first quarter of 2017. Fentanyl was involved in 81 percent of the Massachusetts deaths and heroin in 39 percent of them. 

But fentanyl and heroin are not even addressed in the Rx Awareness campaign, because the CDC didn't want to risk “diluting” its primary message.

“The campaign does not include messages about heroin. Specificity is a best practice in communication, and the Rx Awareness campaign messaging focuses on the critical issue of prescription opioids. Given the broad target audience, focusing on prescription opioids avoids diluting the campaign messaging. Heroin is a related topic that also needs formative research and message testing,” the CDC said.

One of the video testimonials featured in the campaign is the story of Steve Rummler, a Minnesota man with chronic back pain who became addicted to painkillers. Rummler died of a heroin overdose at the age of 43.

His mother Judy, who appears in the video, founded the non-profit Steve Rummler Hope Foundation, an anti-opioid activist group. The Rummler foundation is the “fiscal sponsor” of Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing (PROP), a designation that allows PROP to collect tax deductible donations using the foundation’s non-profit status. PROP founder Andrew Kolodny, MD, is listed as a member of the Rummler foundation's medical advisory committee, as is PROP President Jane Ballantyne, MD.

The CDC said it developed the videos and other campaign material using a “mixed-method design integrating data from in-depth interviews and a quasi-experimental, one-group retrospective post-then-pretest (RPTP) survey was used to assess target audiences’ responses to campaign messages.”

In the other words, the campaign is driven by marketing research -- not Secretary Price's "evidence-based methods." The CDC said most participants in focus groups thought the campaign material was "attention grabbing, believable and meaningful." Many also said they would share the video testimonials with others.   

“This campaign is part of CDC’s continued support for states on the frontlines of the opioid overdose epidemic,” said CDC Director Brenda Fitzgerald, MD. “These heartbreaking stories of the devastation brought on by opioid abuse have the potential to open eyes – and save lives.”

CVS to Limit Opioid Prescriptions

By Pat Anson, Editor

CVS Health has announced plans to further restrict the filling of opioid prescriptions at its pharmacies by limiting the dose and supply of opioids for acute pain to seven days. The new policy only applies to customers enrolled in the CVS Caremark pharmacy benefit management program, which provides pharmacy services to over 2,000 health and insurance plans.

CVS said its opioid policy would “give greater weight” to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's opioid prescribing guideline, which discourages doctors from prescribing opioids for chronic pain.

“The CDC Guideline should become the default approach to prescribing opiates, a scenario in which physicians would have to seek exceptions for those patients who need more medication or longer duration of therapy,” Troyen Brennan, MD, CVS’ Chief Medical Officer wrote in a post on Health Affairs Blog.

But the new CVS policy actually goes beyond the voluntary recommendations of the CDC guideline, which was only intended to give advice to primary care physicians who treat chronic pain.

Beginning February 1, CVS will limit all opioid prescriptions for acute pain to seven days. For both acute and chronic pain, opioid doses must not exceed 90mg morphine equivalent units and patients will be required to try immediate release formulations, before using extended release opioids.

The policy will apply to all 90 million CVS customers enrolled in commercial, employer or Medicaid health plans. CVS operates 9,700 pharmacies and 1,100 walk-in medical clinics nationwide.

In announcing the policy, CVS rejected complaints that it and other healthcare providers were adopting a “heavy-handed, cookie cutter” approach to patient care – decisions best left between a patient and their doctor.

“To be sure, prescriber autonomy and respect for the physician-patient relationship are of paramount importance. However, there is little evidence to show that past opioid prescribing habits are necessary or appropriate, and there is a great deal of evidence that they have produced significant harm,” said Brennan.

“We see firsthand the impact of the alarming and rapidly growing epidemic of opioid addiction and misuse,” said Larry Merlo, CEO of CVS Health. 

“With this expansion of our industry-leading initiatives, we are further strengthening our commitment to help providers and patients balance the need for these powerful medications with the risk of abuse and misuse.” 

Opioids Have Been Costly for CVS

Patient safety may not be the only factor behind CVS’ decision to limit opioid prescriptions. In recent years, the company has been fined hundreds of millions of dollars for violations of the Controlled Substances Act and other transgressions, many of them involving opioid medication.

As PNN has reported, CVS recently agreed to pay a $5 million fine to settle allegations that several CVS pharmacies in California failed to detect thefts of the painkiller hydrocodone by employees.

In 2016, CVS also paid a $3.5 million fine to resolve allegations that 50 of its pharmacies in Massachusetts and New Hampshire filled forged opioid prescriptions. One forger signed a dentist’s name on 131 prescriptions for hydrocodone and had them filled at eight different CVS stores. Another forger obtained over 200 prescriptions for hydrocodone and methadone by forging the name of an emergency room physician.

And in 2015, CVS paid a $22 million fine after two of its pharmacies in Florida were found to be routinely filling bogus prescriptions for painkillers, including some for customers as far away as Kentucky.

As a result of these and other fines, CVS pharmacists were already under pressure to be wary of filling opioid prescriptions. Many started calling doctors to make sure the prescriptions were legitimate and some even refused to fill the prescriptions of longtime customers.

Alcohol Sales Continue

CVS was widely praised for its decision to stop selling cigarettes a few years ago, a move that cost the company $2 billion in lost tobacco sales.  According to Marketplace, the company has also removed transfats from its branded food products and reduced displays of candy near its cash registers.

The healthier offerings apparently do not apply to alcohol, however, a substance that causes far more addiction, death and health problems than opioid medication. This week an advertising flier for CVS stories in California prominently displays a selection of inexpensive beer, wine and hard liquors.

CVS did not respond to a query from PNN about whether it intends to limit the amount and frequency of alcohol purchases, as it is planning to do for opioid pain medications.    

CVS Health (NYSE: CVS) stock has fared poorly in the past year and company insiders have sold nearly $100 million in shares. Among the sellers, according to Barrons, was CEO Merlo – who has sold $26 million in shares so far in 2017, including $20 million in September alone.

Trump Opioid Commission Delays Final Report

By Pat Anson, Editor

The chairman of President Trump’s Commission on Combating Drug Addiction and the Opioid Crisis has asked for – and apparently been granted – a one month delay in releasing the panel’s final report.

In a letter posted on the White House website, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie said the commission’s “research and policy development are still in progress,” and that he was extending the deadline from October 1 to November 1.

Christie said the opioid commission would hold its third public hearing September 27 at the White House. A notice published in the Federal Register indicates the meeting will focus on pain management and the diversion of opioid pain medication.

“The meeting will consist of statements to the Commission from invited government, nonprofit, and business organizations regarding Innovative Pain Management and Prevention Measures for Diversion followed by discussion of the issues raised,” the statement says. No list of attendees is included.

Christie’s letter also says the opioid commission will visit an Ohio medical center to learn about “innovative pain management strategies” and will meet in New Jersey with representatives of the pharmaceutical industry “to talk about partnership opportunities with the National Institutes of Health and the Food and Drug Administration.”

Until now the focus of the opioid commission has been on treating opioid addiction. An interim report released in July recommends increased access to addiction treatment, mandatory education for prescribers on the risks and benefits of opioid medication, and increased efforts to detect and stop the flow of illicit fentanyl into the country. There are no specific recommendations aimed at reducing access to prescription opioids or providing different forms of pain management.

Bondi Joins Commission

Another possible sign of a shift in the commission’s direction is the recent appointment of Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi to the panel. Bondi is now listed as member of the commission on the White House website,  although there has been no official announcement by the Trump administration. She is the fifth politician appointed to the six member panel.

Bondi played a prominent in shutting down on Florida’s pill mills several years ago, but critics say she has been slow to acknowledge that the opioid crisis has shifted away from prescription painkillers to street drugs like heroin and illicit fentanyl. Many pain patients in Florida still have trouble finding pharmacies willing to fill their opioid prescriptions.

Bondi recently joined other state attorneys general in asking pharmaceutical companies for information about their marketing, production and distribution of opioids.

“Florida citizens continue to become addicted to opioids and die daily -- meanwhile, prescription drug manufacturers, distributors and the medical profession all point fingers at each other as the cause of this national crisis,” Bondi said in a statement. “This far-reaching multistate investigation is designed to get the answers we need as quickly as possible. The industry must do the right thing. If they do not, we are prepared to litigate.”

Bondi also recently joined the National Association of Attorneys General in asking the insurance industry to do more to reduce opioid prescriptions and combat opioid abuse.

“Insurance companies can play an important role in reducing opioid prescriptions and making it easier for patients to access other forms of pain management treatment. Indeed, simply asking providers to consider providing alternative treatments is impractical in the absence of a supporting incentive structure,” the attorneys general said in a letter to an insurance industry trade group.

“Insurance companies thus are in a position to make a very positive impact in the way that providers treat patients with chronic pain.”

In addition to Bondi and Christie, opioid commission members include Gov. Charlie Baker of Massachusetts, Gov. Roy Cooper of North Carolina, Bertha Madras, PhD, a professor of psychobiology at Harvard Medical School, and Patrick Kennedy, a former Rhode Island congressman.

The Trump administration has still not officially declared that the opioid crisis is a national emergency – something the President said he would do in August.  

CDC Releases More Faulty Research About Opioids

By Pat Anson, Editor

A new study by researchers at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that opioid overdoses have shaved two and a half months off the average life span of Americans – a somewhat misleading claim because the study does not distinguish between legally obtained prescription opioids and illegal opioids like heroin and illicit fentanyl.

The research letter, published in the medical journal JAMA, looked at the leading causes of death in the U.S. from 2000 to 2015. Overall life expectancy rose during that period, from 76.8 years in 2000 to 78.8 years in 2015, largely due a decline in deaths from heart disease, cancer, stroke, diabetes and other chronic health conditions.

But deaths due to Alzheimer’s disease, suicide, liver disease, drug poisoning and opioid overdoses rose, collectively causing a loss of 0.33 years in life expectancy – most of it due to opioids.

“This loss, mostly related to opioids, was similar in magnitude to losses from all the leading causes of death with increasing death rates,” wrote lead author Deborah Dowell, MD, of the CDC’s National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.

“U.S. life expectancy decreased from 2014 to 2015 and is now lower than in most high-income countries, with this gap projected to increase. These findings suggest that preventing opioid related poisoning deaths will be important to achieving more robust increases in life expectancy once again.”

Dowell was also one of the lead authors of the CDC’s 2016 opioid prescribing guidelines, which discourage physicians from prescribing opioids for chronic pain. She and her two co-authors in the JAMA study --  both of them CDC statisticians -- do not explain why they failed to distinguish between black market opioids and legal prescription opioids, a dubious use of statistics akin to lumping arsonists in the same category as smokers or Boy Scouts learning to build campfires.  

They also fail to even mention the scourge of heroin and illicit fentanyl sweeping the country, which now accounts for the majority of opioid overdoses in several states.  

But Dowell and her co-authors don't stop there. The say the actual number of deaths caused by opioids is “likely an underestimate” because information on death certificates is often incomplete and fails to note the specific drug involved in as many as 25% of overdose deaths. This is another disingenuous claim, because it fails to explain why the data on the other 75% of overdoses is faulty too. 

Epidemic of Despair

Other researchers have also tried to explain the disturbing decline in American life expectancy – which began over adecade ago for middle-aged white Americans. Princeton researchers Anne Case and Angus Deaton were the first to document that trend,  when they estimated that nearly half a million white Americans may have died early because of depression, chronic pain, suicide, alcohol and drug abuse, and other health problems – an epidemic of despair linked to unemployment, poor finances, lack of education, divorce and loss of social connections.

The evidence was right there for Deborah Dowell and her co-authors had they looked for it. The JAMA study found that over 44,000 Americans committed suicide in 2015, a 66% increase from 2000, and over 40,000 died from chronic liver disease or cirrhosis, another 66% increase. Opioid overdoses during that same period rose to 33,000 deaths. 

Which is the bigger epidemic?

As PNN has reported, the CDC ignored early warnings from its own consultant that the agency’s opioid guidelines were being viewed as “strict law rather than a recommendation,” causing many doctors to stop prescribing opioid pain medication. Chronic pain patients also feel “slighted and shamed” by the guidelines, and are increasingly suicidal or turning to street drugs. We’ve also reported that the CDC has apparently done nothing to study the harms or even the possible benefits the guidelines have caused since they were released 18 months ago.

Instead of going back in time and selectively mining databases to fit preconceived notions about opioids, perhaps it is time for the CDC to take a giant step forward and see what its opioid guidelines have actually done.

New HIV Guidelines Discourage Use of Opioids

By Pat Anson, Editor

Opioid pain medication should not be considered as a first-line treatment for people living with HIV, even though chronic pain is a significant health problem that affects up to 85% of HIV/AIDS patients, according to new guidelines released by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

The voluntary guidelines, the first to address treating chronic pain in HIV patients, urge physicians to begin with non-drug treatments such as cognitive behavioral therapy, yoga, physical therapy, hypnosis and acupuncture. Only when those treatments fail do the guidelines recommend medications such as gabapentin (Neurontin), pregabalin (Lyrica), anti-depressants, and medical cannabis.

The guidelines recommend against using opioids because of the risk of misuse, addiction and overdose. Opioid medication should only be considered as a second- or third-line therapy when other treatments prove to be inadequate.

"Opioids are never first-line," said the guidelines' lead author, Douglas Bruce, MD, chief of medicine at Cornell Scott-Hill Health Center, and associate clinical professor of medicine at Yale University.

“Additional clinical trials are needed to assess the effectiveness of the long-term use of opioids in neuropathic pain in PLWH (persons living with HIV). Although short-term use may provide some relief, these medications may be of limited success in chronic neuropathic pain.”

Nearly half of HIV patients suffer from neuropathic pain, likely due to inflammation or injury to the central or peripheral nervous system caused by the infection. Musculoskeletal pain, such as low-back pain and joint pain from osteoarthritis, is also common.

"It has been long known that patients with HIV/AIDS are at high risk for pain, and for having their pain inadequately diagnosed and treated," said Peter Selwyn, MD, co-chair of the guidelines and a professor at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine. “This is an aging population and the changing clinical manifestations of HIV, complexity of the disease and additional challenges related to substance abuse make treatment complicated. These guidelines help provide clarity in treating these patients."

The guidelines recommend that physicians consult with a palliative care or pain management specialist when HIV patients have an advanced illness or near the end of life.

"Because HIV clinicians typically are not experts in pain management, they should work closely with others, such as pain specialists, psychiatrists and physical therapists to help alleviate their patient’s' pain," said Bruce.

Restricting Opioid Doses Won’t Help the Overdose Crisis

By Roger Chriss, Columnist

As the overdose crisis worsens, new strategies and policies are being considered, including a recent petition to remove so-called high-dose opioids from the market.

The petition asks the FDA to ban opioid pills that, when taken as directed, would add up to a daily dose equivalent to more than 90mg of morphine. It is signed by leaders of several anti-opioid activist groups, including Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing (PROP).

"The existence of these products implies that they're safe. They're not,” says Andrew Kolodny, MD, Executive Director and founder of PROP. "These are not medicines. These are lethal weapons that should be removed from the market.”

Before we start removing access to pain medication, it’s incumbent upon us to analyze the question of prescription opioid doses and what role, if any, they have in the overdose crisis.

First, higher doses of opioids are more dangerous. That is obvious, since most substances become dangerous at a sufficiently high dose, or as the Swiss physician Paracelsus supposedly said, “The dose makes the poison.” It is reasonable to conclude that higher doses of an opioid would be riskier.

But there is no inherent implication about safety in the existence of any substance. There is nothing "safe" about chemotherapy drugs, anti-seizure medication or anti-anxiety drugs, just as there is nothing safe about tobacco or alcohol.

Moreover, the opposite of safe is not necessarily dangerous, since something that is "dangerous" can still be clinically beneficial. Open heart surgery is dangerous, but beneficial to someone dying from heart disease.

Conspicuously absent from the signatories of the PROP petition are any physician groups or doctors involved in pain management. Asked to comment on the petition, the President of the Society of Palliative Care Pharmacists told Pharmacy Times that while she agreed that opioid abuse is an urgent concern, she dose not believe that removing high-dose opioids from the market would be the best way to combat the overdose crisis.

“Let’s put our efforts together in an interdisciplinary approach and train providers to accurately assess their patients rather than pulling certain drugs from the market, because there may be cancer patients or others who are truly benefiting from these high-dose opioids,” said Rabia Atayee, PharmD.

The petition argues that people who currently take high-dose opioid medication can simply take two or more lower-dose pills. This would supposedly reduce the risk of overdose when high-dose pills are stolen or diverted.

“Removing UHDU (ultra-high dosage unit) orally-administered opioids from the market will result in patients having to swallow more tablets or capsules. But this is unlikely to result in a significant inconvenience or hardship for patients,” the petition states.

In other words, there would be a trade off. The risk of an overdose would be lower for a person who gets an opioid analgesic from a friend to deal with severe pain. But a person with a disorder like achalasia that impairs swallowing or a GI disorder that impairs absorption may be harmed by having to take more pills.

Unintended Consequences

The strength of the arguments is only one factor here. The unintended consequences of this petition should also be considered. One obvious effect would be an increase in the total number of pills, which would exacerbate concerns about over-prescribing. There would be more pills to steal or divert, and more potential problems in securing the opioid supply chain from manufacturer to pharmacy, a major source of diverted pills that often goes unremarked and unpunished.

Another likely effect is increased activity on the black market. In 2010, when Purdue Pharma brought out its abuse deterring form of OxyContin, some abusers started switching to illegal drugs, including heroin. An uncomfortable outcome of this well-intentioned change is that a public health policy meant to prevent abuse and addiction may have made the overdose crisis worse.

A similar outcome could result from this petition: Drug abusers who are intent on having a high-dose opioid pill may shift to street drugs.

Another possible outcome is that opioid doses keep getting smaller and smaller. If a daily dose of pills containing 90mg of a morphine equivalent (MME) is considered “dangerous,” then what about 80 MME? Or 70 MME? If the changes recommended in this petition do not work, will we try more restrictions in doses and prescribing? Clear measures of the success or failure of the proposal should be defined in a petition like this one, but they are not.

We already have vast quantities of data about the opioid crisis. According to the CDC, opioid prescribing peaked in 2010 and has been in decline ever since, yet overdose rates keep rising. 

The average daily dose of opioids started falling even earlier, in 2006. By 2015, it had declined to nearly 48 MME -- well below the dose sought in the petition.

AVERAGE DAILY PER CAPITA MORPHINE EQUIVALENT DOSE (MME)

Source: CDC/QuintilesIMS

In other words, reducing the amount and dose of prescription opioids is inversely correlated with the number of overdoses. Of course, correlation is not causation, but the negative correlation does not bode well for the effects of this petition. Based on this data, the best we can reasonably hope for is small benefits on the margins of the overdose crisis, at the expense of people who benefit from high-dose prescription opioids.

And this petition will do nothing to improve treatment for people suffering from opioid use disorder or to reduce the risks of people overdosing on heroin or illicit fentanyl. These are key features of the opioid crisis, and a policy that claims to beat addiction without addressing them should be greeted with skepticism.

Instead of new restrictions, perhaps the CDC and state guidelines can be updated to include recommendations that physicians and pharmacists discuss with patients the safe storage and disposal of opioid medications.

Before we ban a medication for having too much of a chemically active ingredient for people who abuse it, we should do whatever we can to ensure that the people who benefit from it are not harmed.

To make a comment on the PROP petition to the FDA, click here.

Roger Chriss lives with Ehlers Danlos syndrome and is a proud member of the Ehlers-Danlos Society.

Roger is a technical consultant in Washington state, where he specializes in mathematics and research.

The information in this column should not be considered as professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. It is for informational purposes only and represents the author’s opinions alone. It does not inherently express or reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Pain News Network.

Pam Bondi to Join Trump Opioid Commission

By Pat Anson, Editor

Less than three weeks before its final report is due, President Trump’s opioid commission is getting a new member --   Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi.

Bondi is a longtime supporter of the president, served as a member of his transition team, and was once rumored to be the next head of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy. There was speculation back in March that Bondi would be named to the opioid commission, but it was not until last week that the White House confirmed it was President Trump's "intent to appoint" Bondi to the panel, which currently has five members.

Curiously, Bondi’s office blamed New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, the chair of the opioid commission, for the six month delay in getting her on board. Both Bondi and Christie are lame ducks serving out their final months in elected office.

“The President always intended for the Attorney General to be on the Commission – however, Governor Christie choose (sic) to begin the Commission with only himself and four others,” Whitney Ray, Bondi’s spokesman, said in an email.

“The announcement (of Bondi's appointment) is protocol before the Executive Order is signed next week. The Attorney General will continue to work with President Trump, General Kelly, Kellyanne Conway and other leaders to combat the national opioid epidemic.“

Bondi's spokesman also reportedly said that the October 1 deadline for the commission to release its final report would be extended. No such announcement has been made and the White House website still doesn’t list Bondi as a commission member.

FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL PAM BONDI

The Trump administration has also yet to issue an official declaration that the opioid crisis is a national emergency – something the President said he would do over a month ago.  

"The opioid crisis is an emergency, and I am saying, officially right now, it is an emergency. It's a national emergency. We're going to spend a lot of time, a lot of effort and a lot of money on the opioid crisis,” Trump said on August 10.

Bondi played a prominent in shutting down Florida’s pill mills several years ago, but critics say she has been slow to acknowledge that the opioid crisis has shifted away from prescription painkillers to heroin and illicit fentanyl.

“The problem is Bondi isn't doing enough about the heroin epidemic,” the Miami Sun Sentinel said in an editorial.  “Considering that Bondi was once touted as a potential Trump drug czar — and infamously failed to investigate Trump University after receiving a major donation from Trump — it's no surprise that she was named to the commission. But she's still living off her reputation from the pill mill crack down.

“In fact, if you Google Bondi and heroin, by far the most you'll read about is when she slammed a drug dealer for stamping Trump's name on a batch of heroin. You won't find any solutions to our crisis.”

In a recent interview with WMBB-TV, Bondi warned that drug dealers were putting heroin and illicit fentanyl into counterfeit medications.

"It's a national epidemic and it truly affects everyone, and parents need to really warn their kids, their teens, adults need to know, never take a pill from someone you don't know, even if they say it is a Tylenol, an Advil or an aspirin. Don't take anything from someone who you don't know," said Bondi.

The initial focus of Trump's opioid commission has been on educating, preventing and treating opioid addiction. An interim report released by the commission in July recommends increased access to addiction treatment, mandatory education for prescribers on the risks and benefits of opioids, and increased efforts to detect and stop the flow of illicit fentanyl into the country.

There are no specific recommendations aimed at reducing access to prescription opioids, although they could be added to the commission’s final report.

In addition to Gov. Christie, commission members include Gov. Charlie Baker of Massachusetts, Gov. Roy Cooper of North Carolina, Bertha Madras, PhD, a professor of psychobiology at Harvard Medical School, and Patrick Kennedy, a former Rhode Island congressman. No pain patients, pain management experts or practicing physicians were appointed to the panel.

Is This the Opioid of the Future?

By Pat Anson, Editor

What do you call a pain reliever that doesn't have a name yet, is not FDA approved and may not be available for years?

Nektar Therapeutics calls it the "opioid of the future."

Nektar is a research-based pharmaceutical company that has developed a new type of opioid medication that shows promise in relieving moderate to severe pain, but without the risk of abuse and addiction of traditional opioids like oxycodone or hydrocodone.

The experimental pill -- which for the time being is called NKTR-181 --  has recieved “fast track” designation  from the Food and Drug Administration, but is at least a couple of years away from full FDA approval and a commercial launch.

That hasn't stopped Nektar from promoting NKTR-181. This week it hosted a lunch symposium on the drug at PainWeek -- an industry trade show underway in Las Vegas -- a sign of just how confident the company is that NKTR-181 will receive final approval from the FDA.

"We think we could see approval as early as the end of next year," says Steve Doberstein, PhD, Chief Scientific Officer of Nektar. "So we could see a launch of this product in the first part of 2019. That would be my aspiration. If we have to do more clinical trial work, it would be delayed."

The FDA usually requires at least two "Phase 3" clinical studies to prove a new drug's effectiveness. Nektar has only completed one -- a Phase 3 study of over 600 patients with chronic back pain who reported that their pain scores dropped by an average of 65% when taking NKTR-181 twice daily.

Nektar has also completed smaller safety studies that found recreational drug users had significantly less “drug liking” of NKTR-181 -- even at high doses -- when compared oxycodone. Participants also had less daytime sleepiness and fewer withdrawal symptoms.

"NKTR-181 is quite boring as far as abuse metrics go. Boring is good. That was our goal. It doesn't appear to cause euphoria," says Doberstein.

NKTR-181 is "boring" because of its slow rate of entry into the brain's central nervous system – which significantly reduces the “high” or euphoric effect that recreational users seek. Many pain sufferers don't feel that high when taking opioid medication, they just get pain relief. But in the current regulatory and political climate, the only way a new opioid will be approved by the FDA is if it has a low or non-existent abuse potential.

"We're very focused on the fact that one of the building blocks of solving this problem is going to be a safe pain medication for chronic pain patients to take," Doberstein told PNN. "The things that work best are opioids. But the existing conventional old-fashioned opioids -- oxycodone is 100 years old -- come with an unacceptable side effect profile for many patients. And we think we've made something that is legitimately better. It's the first time in a very long time that a new opioid molecule has been developed."  

Doberstein thinks NKTR-181 has such low potential for abuse that it will not need to come in an abuse deterrent formula that would make it harder to crush or liquefy. The FDA could still require one, however, which would delay the drug's commercialization even longer. The agency is currently reviewing the effectiveness of all drugs with abuse deterrent formulas.

The FDA also has a new opioid policy steering committee that is examining whether the agency sufficiently considers the risk of abuse during its evaluation of new opioids.  That could result in rule changes that Nektar would have to address. Anti-opioid activists and politicians could also pressure the FDA to require more clinical studies on the safety and potential abuse of NKTR-181.

Another potential obstacle is that Nektar still needs to partner with a larger pharmaceutical company to help produce and commercialize NKTR-181 -- which is when the no-name "opioid of the future" will likely get a makeover with a branded name to make it more marketable.

"This is the kind of medicine that we think could be quite significant. It could really change medical practice. That means we need a lot of education, and a lot of outreach to physicians, hospitals, payers, patient advocates and law enforcement. We have a lot to do. And its probably beyond us to do it ourselves. So we'll have a commercialization partner of some kind," said Doberstein, who told PNN he expects Nektar to announce its new partnership by the end of the year.

Dosing Tables for Painkillers 'Fraught with Danger'

By Pat Anson, Editor

Opioid dosing tables that are widely used by doctors, insurers and regulators to determine what constitutes a safe level of opioid medication are "fraught with danger" and could result in patients being under-dosed or overdosed, according to a leading physician's group.

Equianalgesic dosing tables are used to calculate and convert opioid pain medication into milligrams of morphine equivalent daily doses -- often abbreviated as MEDD or MME. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, for example, has set 90mg MME as the highest recommended daily dose for most chronic pain patients in its opioid prescribing guideline.

But a new white paper by the Academy of Integrative Pain Management (AIPM) questions the science behind MME conversion tables and whether they are appropriate to use in a one-size-fits-all approach to pain care.

“We felt it was necessary to outline our concerns about the key concept of equianalgesic dosing,” said Bob Twillman, PhD, Executive Director of AIPM. “We have seen policymakers and payers both relying on this concept as if it was based on solid science, and as if individual differences in a number of factors wasn’t important in clinical practice. Doing so can expose patients to significant risks."

Some opioids have different mechanisms of action on opioid receptors in the brain. Patients could also have genetic or biological differences that slow or speed-up the absorption of opioids into the body -- making them either more potent or less effective. As a result, two patients taking identical doses of the same opioid could have different levels of it in their bloodstream an hour later.

None of these differences were recognized by the CDC, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services or the Department of Veterans Affairs when they set limits in their opioid guidelines on what constitutes a recommended "safe" dose of pain medication.   

"The practice of setting arbitrary milligram dosing cut-offs as suggested by various regulatory agencies and legally allowed by some states is an attempt to pigeon hole providers into ignoring the approach to medicine," the white paper states. "Rather than assigning irrational rules based on pseudoscience, the regulatory agencies including the CDC and state governments should be targeting ways to increase knowledge and education with regard to opioids to foster safe and efficacious prescribing practices."

Many different opioid calculators and apps are available to help doctors convert oxycodone, hydrocodone, tramadol and other opioid medications into MEDDs or MMEs. It's a common practice that may give physicians peace of mind in complying with government guidelines and insurance company policies. But for patients the benefits are less clear -- and so is the science.

“I’ve been researching and writing about the problems with equianalgesic dosing for the past several years," said Jeffrey Fudin, PharmD, lead author of the white paper. “As I studied this concept, I was shocked by the poor quality of the studies underlying it and by the dramatic clinical effects that could result from an uncritical use of published conversion tables.

"Add to that the fact that some opioid pain medications just don’t fit the concept because of their mechanisms of action, and you have the potential for some serious negative consequences if policies improperly use this information.”

How Chronic Pain Killed My Husband

By Meredith Lawrence, Guest Columnist

So much has been written about the opioid epidemic, but so little seems to be out there about what living with true chronic pain is like. My husband, Jay, lived and died in incredible pain at the age of 58.  As his wife, I lived that journey with him. 

Jay is no longer here to tell his story, but I want the world to see what I saw.  I want you to know how he went from working 60 hours a week doing hard physical labor, until his pain grew worse and he could not even get out of a chair on his own. 

I want you to know the deterioration Jay went through over the last ten years. I want you to know what a good day and a bad day is like when you live with chronic pain.  I want you to know exactly what happened when the doctor decreased his pain medication. And I want you to know how my husband finally made the decision to commit suicide. 

I want people to understand that when chronic pain runs your life, eventually you just want the pain to stop. 

First a bit of history.  I met Jay in 2005, when we both stopped drinking.  Two years later, Jay began to lose feeling in his legs and started having falls, as a result of compressed nerves in his spine. The pain was so bad Jay had to stop working and go on disability, which started his depressive episodes.

JAY LAWRENCE

Jay had a series of lower back and neck fusion surgeries.  This was when he was first prescribed painkillers, antidepressants and anti-anxiety medications.  From 2008 to 2011, Jay tried various treatments to control the pain that lingered even after a third back surgery.  These included steroid shots, nerve blocks and a spinal cord stimulator.  Ultimately he had a drug pump implanted that delivered morphine, in addition to the pain pills he was being prescribed.

In 2012, Jay was diagnosed with trauma induced dementia.  I believe that diagnosis was right, based on his symptoms, but not all of the doctors agreed.  Some believed the confusion was due to high doses of morphine and/or his sleep apnea.  

By 2016, Jay’s confusion and memory issues were increasing. He was on a steady dose of 120mg morphine daily, in addition to the medication he was receiving from his pain pump. 

Jay’s depression seemed to come and go, depending on the day and his pain levels.  He was weaned down on his Xanax to 2mg a day to help him sleep. He was aware of the risks of combining Xanax and morphine. 

JAY AND MEREDITH LAWRENCE

Let me tell you what a good day was like before they changed his medications. I worked a full time job from 2 pm to 10 pm five days a week. I would get home, and Jay would have my coffee ready for me at night.  We would stay up and watch TV until 2 or so.  When it was time for sleep, I went to bed and he slept in his recliner.

We started sleeping apart after his first surgery in 2007. He was more comfortable sitting up in the chair, but could never sleep more than three hours at a time.  He knew sleeping in bed would just keep me awake. 

A good day always meant it was not cold or raining.  On a good morning, he would be up first and get coffee started.  He would take our two miniature pinchers outside in the yard on their leash for potty time. 

We usually had at least one appointment a week, but if not we could have a nice quiet morning.  That meant coffee in front of the TV.  After a couple of hours of that, he might switch over to playing his computer games, but he was never far from his chair. 

A typical adventure for us would involve going to Walmart.  Jay was not able to walk through the store, but he hated using the handicapped carts. I could always see a look on his face when he had to do it.  After going to the store, we might have lunch or an early dinner at Steak n Shake or Cracker Barrel.  It always needed to be some place familiar and comfortable for him.  More than once we sat, ordered and then took our food home because he was in too much pain. 

In the summer we might walk the dogs after dinner.  Just a quick two block walk, but a lot of times he would have to stop halfway and go back home.  A couple of times I had to go get the car and pick him up because his legs just would not support him anymore. 

A bad day was awful for me to watch, and absolutely horrible for Jay to live. It meant no real sleep, just catnaps in the chair whenever he could.  He always made coffee for us, but on a bad day he would forget to add coffee to the coffee maker and we would just have hot water.  The pain was so much he was just distracted. 

On many bad days, I would look over and see tears just running down his face because he was in so much pain.  It also made Jay’s depression worse.  We spent many cold winter nights talking about how much pain would be too much and would make life not worth living.  It is the most horrible feeling in this whole world to hear the person you love most talk about ending their life. 

In January, 2017 Jay’s pain clinic decided they could no longer prescribe the high doses of morphine he was on.  In addition, they were not going to continue seeing him if he decided to stay on Xanax.  The Xanax was prescribed by another doctor, but they did not care.

I begged the pain doctor -- yes, literally begged -- for some other option. The doctor said that if Jay continued the Xanax he would no longer see him.  He would not give another option for medications, and at one point even said that most of his patients with pain were “making it up.”

The last thing the doctor said to us will stick with me forever.  He said, “My patient’s quality of life is not worth losing my practice over.”

When we left that day, we were barely in the car and I knew what Jay was going to say to me.  I will never forget how sad his voice was when he told me this was it for him. He was not going to continue to live like this.

Through the month of February, as Jay’s medication was decreased, we spent time doing things we did not normally do.  We went out on Valentine’s Day, he bought me the first jewelry he had bought since my engagement ring, and we went out to a fancy restaurant for dinner.  Jay tried to cram in as many good memories as he could into that last month, but I knew it was costing him.

Jay’s next doctor’s appointment was scheduled for March 2, and we knew they were going to decrease his medications again.  The night before, he woke me up to tell me it was time.  I knew what that meant, but I tried to be strong for his sake.  We talked all night long about what it meant, and how it should be.  It was the saddest, strangest, longest night of my life. 

Jay knew he did not have enough pills to kill himself.  He also knew that if he were to try and purchase a gun, they would not sell it to him.  It would have been almost obvious what he was going to use it for. 

In the end, I bought the gun that Jay used -- and yes, we talked about the ramifications of that action.  We went to the park where we had renewed our vows in 2015.  We talked in the car for a while, and then we sat in the same place we had cut our wedding cake.  I was holding his hand when he pulled the trigger. .

Through the shock and horror, my immediate feeling was one of relief for Jay. To know that he was finally out of pain was a weight lifted off both of us.

Because I purchased the gun that Jay used to end his life, I was charged under our state's assisted suicide law.  This charge was later reduced to reckless endangerment, and I am currently on probation. People close to me want me to be quiet about my role in Jay’s death, and I was at first. But I cannot continue that way. 

I know Jay wanted me to put his story out there.  I know he wanted people to know what it was like to live with the pain he lived with daily. When the doctor took away Jay’s medications, they took away his quality of life. That was what led to his decision. Jay fought hard to live with his pain for a long time, but in the end fighting just was not enough. 

Something has to be done to wake up the doctors, insurers and regulators to make them see pain patients as real people. People with husbands, wives and children that love them.  People that are suffering and just barely holding on. 

Pain News Network invites other readers to share their stories with us.  Send them to:  editor@PainNewsNetwork.org. 

The information in this column should not be considered as professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. It is for informational purposes only and represents the author’s opinions alone. It does not inherently express or reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Pain News Network.