Tell Me Who the Real Criminals Are

By Cathy Kean 

Close your eyes. Go back to the worst pain you have ever known. A broken bone. A car wreck. Surgery. Childbirth without relief. Stay there for fifteen seconds. 

Feel the desperation. The begging. The need for it to stop.

Now imagine never leaving that place. You feel that pain every second. Every day. No break. Not in sleep. Not ever.

That is my life. Millions of us live here.

There is something that helps. Prescription opioids do not erase my pain, but they turn down the volume enough for me to be able to shower. To work. To keep my home. To hug my grand child without screaming inside.

Then they took them away. They said it was for my own good.

Before my chronic pain worsened after the release of the CDC opioid guideline, I worked as a real estate agent and special education advocate. 

Now I cannot walk. I have lost my job. My home of 32 years is in foreclosure. Friends stopped calling. I need help to use the bathroom. My independence is a corpse they are still kicking.

And the final cruelty? The people who did this lied to you.

CATHY KEAN

The Lies Behind the ‘Opioid Crisis’

You have been told prescription opioids are killing America. In 2021, the CDC reported a 1,040% increase in overdose deaths involving synthetic opioids from 2013 to 2019. They said those deaths were largely caused by illicitly manufactured fentanyl.

Here is what they didn’t tell you in that report: For many years, CDC misclassified most of those overdoses as prescription opioid deaths, and those deaths were used to help justify the agency’s 2016 opioid guideline, which led to wholesale restrictions on opioid prescribing. 

Not until 2018 was the error quietly acknowledged by four CDC researchers. And that tens of thousands of illicit fentanyl deaths were misclassified for years as prescription opioid deaths. 

The error was so serious that in 2016 alone, over 15,000 deaths caused by illicit fentanyl were mistakenly attributed to prescription opioids. Millions of Americans were misled by these and other errors that inflated the overdose numbers.

The White House told you prescription painkillers were the enemy. The media screamed it. Meanwhile, the real causes – illicit fentanyl, heroin and methadone – were hidden inside the CDC's overdose numbers.

The Death Toll They Won't Count

Because of the CDC guideline, thousands of chronic pain patients killed themselves. 

Not because they wanted to die, but because they could no longer get the prescription opioids that made life bearable. The pain became more than they could endure. And suicide offered a way out.

Others died slowly. From heart failure. Stroke. Organ collapse. The brutal physics of untreated pain grinding a body into dust.

No one in power keeps track of those deaths or says a word about them. No government agency. No major news outlet. No one with a microphone stands up and says, "We made a mistake. We are killing innocent people."

Instead, they push Suboxone and “alternative treatments.” For money. Not thy fellow man.

We have lost our First Amendment rights in the doctor's office. If you speak up about your pain, you are labeled a drug seeker and abandoned as a patient. I would rather die at home than face contempt again in the ER.

What I Want You to Do

Now imagine those 15 seconds of the worst pain you’ve ever felt. Really do them. Feel that pain.

Could you live like that? For one week? One year?

I am not asking for your pity. I am demanding your understanding. Your voice. Your outrage.

We are not criminals. We are not drug seekers. We are not addicts. We are not statistics on a CDC spreadsheet.

We are mothers and fathers. Veterans who served you. Construction workers who built your cities. Nurses who held your hand. Grandparents who babysat your children.

And we are dying. Some by suicide. And some by the slow, grinding destruction of our lives and bodies.

So here is what I need from you:

Do not look away. Say our names. Help us get our lives back.

Because if you could spend fifteen seconds in my body — really spent them — you would not need to be asked twice. You would be screaming with us.

Cathy Kean lives in California. She is a grandmother of 9 and mother of 4. Cathy lives with intractable pain from a botched surgery, along with fibromyalgia, arachnoiditis, stiff person syndrome, lupus, Parkinson's disease and insomnia. 

Cathy is the creator and administrator of the Facebook pages Chronic Illness Awareness and Advocacy Coalition and Pain is Pain. She writes to give a voice to the millions of chronic pain patients who have been silenced, stigmatized, and left to suffer—and to ensure her grandchildren never have to ask why Grandma couldn't be there. 

CDC Opioid Guideline Raised Cost of Pain Care

By Pat Anson

The CDC’s 2016 opioid prescribing guideline not only had disastrous consequences for many pain patients, but raised the cost of treating them in primary care practices, according to a new analysis.

Researchers at the University of Wisconsin-Madison studied the budget impact of four different strategies used at primary care clinics to comply with the guideline, which strongly encouraged doctors to reduce opioid prescribing. 

The strategies primarily relied on prescriber education, evaluations and auditing to see if the clinics were successful in reducing the use of opioids. Whether patient safety and pain relief improved were not part of the study.

The cost per clinic for implementing the strategies ranged from $4,416 to $8,358, with prescriber education being the cheapest approach. However, while education alone cost less upfront, the clinics that used it had the largest increases in downstream expenses, such as greater use of urine drug tests (UDTs), treatment agreements, and depression screening. That made it the most costly approach overall.       

The 2016 guideline recommended that doctors limit daily opioid doses to no more than 90 morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), conduct regular drug testing of patients, and have patients sign “pain contracts” promising to follow their doctor’s treatment plan.

The CDC’s recommendations were not only costly and burdensome to providers, according to researchers, but resulted in “no significant decrease” in MME for patients on long-term opioid therapy. Patients on opioid therapy for less than 3 months saw their doses decline by 6%. 

“In summary, from 2016 to 2022, no evidence emerged showing that UDTs were effective in improving long-term outcomes such as decreased overdoses or better pain management,” wrote lead author Andrew Quanbeck, PhD, an Associate Professor in the University of Wisconsin's Department of Family Medicine and Community Health.

“Over time, treatment agreements and UDTs have emerged as low-value care that imposes significant costs for primary care physicians and patients. Results suggest that health systems have an opportunity to shift focus from costly surveillance tools to inexpensive, holistic screening for pain, function, and quality of life and careful initiation of opioids for new patients.”  

The study, published in the Annals of Family Medicine, is one of the few to analyze the long-term impact of the original CDC guideline.  

It’s important to note that the CDC updated its guideline in 2022 to give more “flexibility” to doctors prescribing opioids. However, many of the agency’s 2016 recommendations were so stringently adopted by states, healthcare systems, insurers, and even law enforcement agencies that they remain unchanged – even though there were many reports of patients being harmed by them.

“It is clear that the CDC Guideline has harmed many patients,” the American Medical Association wrote in a 2020 letter to the CDC. “In many cases, health insurance plans and pharmacy benefit managers have used the 2016 CDC Guidelines to justify inappropriate one-size-fits-all restrictions on opioid analgesics while also maintaining restricted access to other therapies for pain.”

The Food and Drug Administration also warned the CDC guideline was causing “serious harm” to patients, including forced tapers, uncontrolled pain, psychological distress and suicide.    

In a 2022 PNN survey of over 2,500 patients and providers, nearly 85% said the CDC should not have created guidelines for opioid prescribing and pain treatment. Over 93% said the guidelines made the quality of pain care in the United States worse.

Opioid Prescribing Down Significantly for U.S. Nursing Home Residents

By Pat Anson

Opioid prescribing to U.S. nursing home residents declined significantly over the past decade, the latest sign that efforts to limit access to opioid medication are impacting patients who need them for pain relief.

Researchers at University of California San Francisco (UCSF) looked at health data for nearly 3 million Medicare beneficiaries and found that the likelihood of nursing home residents receiving a prescription opioid fell from 48% in 2011 to 33.5% in 2022. 

The chances of a resident receiving a high daily dose above 50 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) also declined, from 25.1% to 21.9%. 

Over half of nursing home residents have chronic pain from arthritis, osteoporosis, degenerative disc disease and other age-related conditions. The average age of residents in this study was 84.

“We weren’t expecting to see a decline, especially for people who are actually reporting high incidence of chronic pain,” first author Ulrike Muench, an associate professor at UCSF School of Nursing, told the San Francisco Chronicle. “It might be a good thing that opioids are used less, but at the same time it raises concerns about potentially untreated pain for individuals who are in need of pain medications.”

The study is believed to be the first to examine opioid prescribing to nursing home residents after the release of the CDC’s 2016 opioid guideline. Although that voluntary guideline was intended only for patients being treated for chronic pain by primary care providers, it essentially became the default guideline for all patients and doctors of every specialty.

Opioid prescriptions to nursing home residents were falling even before the CDC guideline was released, with the decline affecting every racial and ethnic group. 

Opioid Prescribing to U.S. Nursing Home Residents

JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE

“These reductions parallel national patterns in primary care and may reflect implications of opioid-related policies, such as the 2016 Guideline, extending beyond their intended setting. Some residents may have benefitted from opioid reductions, but others may face barriers to adequate pain control,” researchers reported in JAMA Internal Medicine.    

“We also observed that minoritized residents were consistently less likely to receive opioids and higher daily MMEs, suggesting that prescribing decisions may not be based solely on clinical need.”

White nursing home residents were significantly more likely to be prescribed an opioid for pain than residents who are Black, Hispanic, Asian or Native American, even though minority residents are more likely to have severe pain.   

Previous studies have also documented declines in opioid prescribing to cancer patients, as well as seriously ill patients in palliative or hospice care  – groups that were supposed to be exempt from the CDC guideline.

Brandeis Must Confront the Human Cost of Opioid Restrictions

By Arianne Grand-Gassaway

As a mother who lost my 35-year-old daughter, Desiree, to a counterfeit Xanax pill in the wake of restrictive prescribing policies, I am calling on Brandeis University to reckon with its role in a public health crisis.

The 2016 CDC Guideline on Opioid Prescribing, heavily influenced by Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing (PROP) and its founder, Dr. Andrew Kolodny— Co-Director of Opioid Policy Research at Brandeis -- has helped fuel a humanitarian disaster.

Tens of millions of Americans with chronic pain and mental health conditions face untreated suffering, forced tapers, and abandonment by providers terrified of prosecution for prescribing opioids and other controlled substances like Xanax.

I am one of those Americans. I suffer from intractable pain and was denied opioid medication for a decade, before I found a provider who is treating my pain now. That decade of no pain care did irreparable damage to my body though.

Jewish wisdom, a cornerstone of Brandeis’s identity, teaches that saving one life is akin to saving the world (Mishnah Sanhedrin 4:5). Yet, these policies have done the opposite. My daughter, unable to access medically necessary medication for her panic disorder, turned to someone she thought she could trust—a desperate act that cost her life.

So many now are dehumanized by a system that prioritizes fear and suspicion over compassion. My family’s story is not unique. Despite a recent decline in overdoses, drug poisonings remain near record levels, with over 80,000 fatal overdoses in 2024.

Most of these deaths involve illicit fentanyl, while legitimate prescriptions remain out of reach for those who need them most: the sick, injured, and elderly.

On May 7, 2025, I wrote a letter to Brandeis Interim President Arthur Levine, urging dialogue that includes patient voices. Weeks later, after a follow-up call, I have received no response. This silence mirrors the broader dismissal of patients crying out for relief.

Brandeis, a self-proclaimed beacon of social justice, has a moral obligation to examine how Dr. Kolodny’s influence and advocacy have contributed to this crisis. Limiting prescriptions has not reduced addiction or overdoses — it has punished the vulnerable while illicit drugs continue to flood our streets.

By his own testimony, Dr. Kolodny only works part-time at Brandeis, which enables him to continue his work as an expert witness and consultant for plaintiff law firms involved in opioid litigation, for which he charges $780 per hour.

In 2022, Dr. Kolodny testified in West Virginia that “it’s been lucrative” work for him personally, although he declined to state the total amount of money he’s been paid by law firms over the years. Under questioning, he didn’t dispute estimates that it was a million dollars or more.   

I call on Brandeis to host a public forum with patients, providers, and policymakers to confront the harms caused by the CDC guideline and restore the doctor-patient relationship. Providers must be free to prescribe based on good faith and informed consent, without fear. We can prevent addiction and treat it compassionately without sacrificing those whose lives depend on these medications.

This is not just my story — it’s the story of many millions. If Brandeis and other organizations in positions of power to change the trajectory of this tragedy continue to remain silent, I will continue to speak, for Desiree and for all those suffering and dying. The time for action is now. 

Cancer Patients Were Supposed to Be Exempt From CDC Opioid Guideline. They’re Not.

By Crystal Lindell

Cancer patients needing pain treatment were always meant to be exempt from the recommendations of the 2016 CDC opioid guideline, including the updated guideline released in 2022:

“This clinical practice guideline does not apply to patients undergoing cancer-related pain treatment, palliative care, or end-of-life care because… for many persons at the end of life, serious potential long-term opioid-related harms such as opioid use disorder might not be relevant.” 

A new study reveals that many older cancer patients were deprived of opioids anyway, even though they often require opioids as a first-line pain treatment.

The study looked at nearly 12,000 older adults on Medicare who were being treated for cancer from 2010 to 2020, including about 1,300 with advanced cancer or cancer pain.

Researchers found a significant 24% decline in opioid prescribing to cancer patients after the 2016 guideline was released. What did they get instead for pain relief?

There was a 7.5% increase in tramadol prescribing for cancer pain, while gabapentinoid prescribing for cancer patients rose by 25%. Even patients with advanced cancer were switched to tramadol or gabapentinoids, a class of nerve medication originally developed to treat seizures, not pain. 

“These findings suggest the 2016 guideline may have led to pain management shifts from first-line opioids to less-safe tramadol and less-effective gabapentinoids for older adults with cancer,” wrote lead author Rebecca Rodin, MD, Assistant Professor of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine at the Icahn Mount School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.

It’s great to see the study authors call out tramadol and gabapentinoids as being “less safe” and “less effective.” Pain patients have long known that to be true, but the medical community still seems resistant to this information. 

While tramadol is technically an opioid, the DEA classifies it as a weaker Schedule IV drug, unlike oxycodone, hydrocodone and other opioids classified as Schedule II. The differentiation means doctors face less restrictions for prescribing it and less risk of going to prison. 

Gapabentin (Neurontin), pregabalin (Lyrica) and other gabapentinoids are prescribed off-label for cancer pain and chemotherapy-induced neuropathy —  even though they are medical conditions the drugs are not approved for. Gabapentinoids are not only ineffective analgesics for cancer pain, they can cause sedation and confusion, particularly in older adults.

Opioids, on the other hand, are very effective for moderate-to-severe cancer pain, with a response rate of 75% and a 50% average reduction in pain intensity.

Studies like this validate what the pain community has been trying to warn about for almost a decade: opioid-phobia has gone too far. It has reached a point where even cancer patients can’t get the pain relief they need.

Part of why this persists is that most people don’t think opioid restrictions are a problem until they or a loved one needs them. But if you wait until you’re dying from cancer to oppose opioid restrictions, it will be far, far too late. 

Of course, the other problem is, cancer is not the only thing that can cause debilitating pain. And people with other types of pain also deserve effective relief.

Another recent study by Dr. Rodin found that seriously ill patients in palliative and hospice care also have trouble getting opioids, due to inadequate supplies in pharmacies and insurance obstacles.

“The reality is that hundreds of thousands of seriously ill patients in the U.S. rely on opioids as a first-line treatment for pain. For people with advanced cancer, chronic organ failure, or other life-limiting conditions, opioids are often the only medications that can effectively control pain and allow them to function, Rodin wrote in a recent op/ed in STAT .  

Opioids have been used for centuries to treat pain for a reason: They work very well, and the risks of opioid addiction and.overdose are far less than what the public has been led to believe. 

Now we just need to convince doctors and the CDC of that. 

Where is CDC’s Guidance About Its Opioid Guideline?

By Carol Levy, PNN Columnist

By happenstance, I recently came across the CDC's 2022 revised opioid prescribing guideline. Too many doctors and states saw the agency’s original 2016 guideline as being written in stone -- not the voluntary set of recommendations they were intended to be.

To their credit, the CDC tried to address that misconception in its updated guideline:

“Recommendations are voluntary and are intended to support, not supplant, individualized, person-centered care. Flexibility to meet the care needs and the clinical circumstances of a specific patient is paramount.”

The CDC also acknowledged the damage done by its 2016 guideline, when many pain patients were forcibly tapered or cutoff from opioids, regardless of their diagnosis or condition. 

Some patients were abandoned by doctors who no longer wanted to risk going to prison for prescribing opioids. Other physicians retired or closed their offices, sometimes without warning. And several states passed legislation limiting how many days initial opioid prescriptions could be written for.

It is always hard to put the genie back in the bottle. Two years after the revised guideline was released, about 90% of patients still have trouble getting their opioid prescriptions filled at pharmacies. Others have to fight with their insurance company to get opioid medication covered.

Patients are still being forced into withdrawal and disability, despite a history of taking opioids safely and responsibly. Some will have to leave jobs they could only perform with the help of opioids. Others can’t play with their kids, walk the dog or even get out of bed, because they are no longer able to get the medication that helped them lead relatively normal lives.

It should not have taken CDC six years to revise the opioid guideline, to make clear that they were only recommendations and never a mandate.

Is there a way to undo the damage? For the doctors who closed their practices or stopped treating pain, it is probably too late. For the patients who chose suicide because they could no longer get opioids, it is definitely too late

But maybe, just maybe, we can persuade doctors, pharmacists, lawmakers and insurers to take another look at the revised opioid guideline and convince them they are out of line.

It would be helpful if the CDC joined in an effort to fix the mess that it helped create.

Carol Jay Levy has lived with trigeminal neuralgia, a chronic facial pain disorder, for over 30 years. She is the author of “A Pained Life, A Chronic Pain Journey.”  Carol is the moderator of the Facebook support group “Women in Pain Awareness.” Her blog “The Pained Life” can be found here. 

New CDC Guideline: Too Little, Too Late for Chronic Pain Patients

By Sam Whitehead and Andy Miller, Kaiser Health News

Jessica Layman estimates she has called more than 150 doctors in the past few years in her search for someone to prescribe opioids for her chronic pain.

“A lot of them are straight-up insulting,” said the 40-year-old, who lives in Dallas. “They say things like ‘We don’t treat drug addicts.’”

Layman has tried a host of non-opioid treatments to help with the intense daily pain caused by double scoliosis, a collapsed spinal disc, and facet joint arthritis. But she said nothing worked as well as methadone, an opioid she has taken since 2013.

The latest phone calls came late last year, after her previous doctor shuttered his pain medicine practice, she said. She hopes her current doctor won't do the same. “If something should happen to him, there's nowhere for me to go,” she said.

Layman is one of the millions in the U.S. living with chronic pain. Many have struggled to get opioid prescriptions written and filled since 2016 guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention inspired laws cracking down on doctor and pharmacy practices. The CDC recently updated those recommendations to try to ease their impact, but doctors, patients, researchers, and advocates say the damage is done.

“We had a massive opioid problem that needed to be rectified,” said Antonio Ciaccia, president of 3 Axis Advisors, a consulting firm that analyzes prescription drug pricing. “But the federal crackdowns and guidelines have created collateral damage: patients left high and dry.”

Born of an effort to fight the nation’s overdose crisis, the guidance led to legal restrictions on doctors’ ability to prescribe painkillers. The recommendations left many patients grappling with the mental and physical health consequences of rapid dose tapering or abruptly stopping medication they’d been taking for years, which carries risks of withdrawal, depression, anxiety, and even suicide.

Opioid Guideline Revised

In November, the agency released new guidelines, encouraging physicians to focus on the individual needs of patients. While the guidelines still say opioids should not be the go-to option for pain, they ease recommendations about dose limits, which were widely viewed as hard rules in the CDC’s 2016 guidance. The new standards also warn doctors about risks associated with rapid dose changes after long-term use.

But some doctors worry the new recommendations will take a long time to make a meaningful change — and may be too little, too late for some patients. The reasons include a lack of coordination from other federal agencies, fear of legal consequences among providers, state policymakers hesitant to tweak laws, and widespread stigma surrounding opioid medication.

The 2016 guidelines for prescribing opioids to people with chronic pain filled a vacuum for state officials searching for solutions to the overdose crisis, said Dr. Pooja Lagisetty, an assistant professor of medicine at the University of Michigan Medical School.

The dozens of laws that states passed limiting how providers prescribe or dispense those medications, she said, had an effect: a decline in opioid prescriptions even as overdoses continued to climb.

The first CDC guidelines “put everybody on notice,’’ said Dr. Bobby Mukkamala, chair of the American Medical Association’s Substance Use and Pain Care Task Force. Physicians reduced the number of opioid pills they prescribe after surgeries, he said. The 2022 revisions are “a dramatic change,” he said.

The human toll of the opioid crisis is hard to overstate. Opioid overdose deaths have risen steadily in the U.S. in the past two decades, with a spike early in the covid-19 pandemic. The CDC says illicit fentanyl has fueled a recent surge in overdose deaths.

Taking into account the perspective of chronic pain patients, the latest recommendations try to scale back some of the harms to people who had benefited from opioids but were cut off, said Dr. Jeanmarie Perrone, director of the Penn Medicine Center for Addiction Medicine and Policy.

“I hope we just continue to spread caution without spreading too much fear about never using opioids,” said Perrone, who helped craft the CDC’s latest recommendations.

Christopher Jones, director of the CDC’s National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, said the updated recommendations are not a regulatory mandate but only a tool to help doctors “make informed, person-centered decisions related to pain care.”

Multiple studies question whether opioids are the most effective way to treat chronic pain in the long term. But drug tapering is associated with deaths from overdose and suicide, with risk increasing the longer a person had been taking opioids, according to research by Dr. Stefan Kertesz, a professor of medicine at the University of Alabama-Birmingham.

He said the new CDC guidance reflects “an extraordinary amount of input” from chronic pain patients and their doctors but doubts it will have much of an impact if the FDA and the Drug Enforcement Administration don’t change how they enforce federal laws.

Patients Still Not Getting Needed Medication

The FDA approves new drugs and their reformulations, but the guidance it provides for how to start or wean patients could urge clinicians to do so with caution, Kertesz said. The DEA, which investigates physicians suspected of illegally prescribing opioids, declined to comment.

The DEA’s pursuit of doctors put Danny Elliott of Warner Robins, Georgia, in a horrible predicament, said his brother, Jim.

In 1991, Danny, a pharmaceutical company rep, suffered an electric shock. He took pain medicine for the resulting brain injury for years until his doctor faced federal charges of illegally dispensing prescription opioids, Jim said.

Danny turned to doctors out of state — first in Texas and then in California. But Danny’s latest physician had his license suspended by the DEA last year, and he couldn’t find a new doctor who would prescribe those medications, Jim said.

Danny, 61, and his wife, Gretchen, 59, died by suicide in November. “I’m really frustrated and angry about pain patients being cut off,” Jim said.

Danny became an advocate against forced drug tapering before he died. Chronic pain patients who spoke with KHN pointed to his plight in calling for more access to opioid medications.

DANNY AND GRETCHEN ELLIOT

Even for people with prescriptions, it’s not always easy to get the drugs they need.

Pharmacy chains and drug wholesalers have settled lawsuits for billions of dollars over their alleged role in the opioid crisis. Some pharmacies have seen their opioid allocations limited or cut off, noted Ciaccia, with 3 Axis Advisors.

Rheba Smith, 61, of Atlanta, said that in December her pharmacy stopped filling her prescriptions for Percocet and MS Contin. She had taken those opioid medications for years to manage chronic pain after her iliac nerve was mistakenly cut during surgery, she said.

Smith said she visited nearly two dozen pharmacies in early January but could not find one that would fill her prescriptions. She finally found a local mail-order pharmacy that filled a one-month supply of Percocet. But now that drug, along with MS Contin, are not available, the pharmacy told her.

“It has been a horrible three months. I have been in terrible pain,” Smith said.

Many patients fear a future of constant pain. Layman thinks about the lengths she’d go to in order to get medication.

“Would you be willing to buy drugs off the street? Would you be willing to go to an addiction clinic and try to get pain treatment there? What are you willing to do to stay alive?” she said. “That is what it comes down to.”

Kaiser Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues.

CDC Revises Opioid Guideline, But Can It Undo the Damage to Pain Care?

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has released a long-awaited final update to its controversial opioid prescribing guideline, expanding the recommendations to include patients suffering from short and long-term pain, while at the same time giving doctors more flexibility when prescribing opioids.

Although voluntary and only intended for primary care providers treating chronic pain, the original 2016 guideline was adopted as a mandatory opioid policy by many states, insurers, medical societies and even law enforcement agencies, resulting in millions of patients being reduced to lower ineffective doses or taken off opioids and forced into withdrawal. The newly revised guideline is intended to end the “one-size-fits-all” approach to pain care and a public health experiment gone wrong.

“Fundamentally, the framing of the guideline is that pain happens in many different ways, in different intensities, and patients respond to different treatments in different ways. And so it is paramount that clinical decisions are based on the individual needs of the patient,” said Christopher Jones, PharmD, Acting Director of CDC’s National Center for Injury Prevention and Control and a guideline co-author.

“In some cases opioids, even opioids at high doses, are the right thing to do for the patient. It’s more about working with the patient to set expectations and goals and look at the full range of treatments. And if opioids are the right thing or opioids plus non-pharmacological treatments, or opioids plus NSAIDs, if that’s the right thing and the patient is doing well and meeting their goals, this guideline supports that. It doesn’t dictate any particular type of care that any particular patient has to receive.”

Benefits vs Risks

To be clear, the revised guideline still takes a dim view of opioid pain medication and its potential to result in addiction and overdose. Doctors are advised to “maximize” the use of non-opioid drugs and non-pharmacological treatments, and should “only consider initiating opioid therapy if expected benefits for pain and function are anticipated to outweigh risks to the patient.” When opioids are prescribed, it should be at the “lowest possible effective dose.”   

Other notable changes in the guideline:

• A more cautious, slower approach to opioid tapering that strongly encourages patient buy-in before doses are reduced

• Drug testing only recommended when “appropriate.” Doctors should first “consider the benefits and risks of toxicology tests”

• Instead of “extreme” caution about taking opioids with benzodiazepines and other anti-anxiety drugs, “particular” caution is recommended

• Patients should not be dismissed for failing a drug test or because of information found in prescription drug databases (PDMPs)

Importantly, the revised guideline also removes a recommendation in the 2016 guideline that daily opioid doses not exceed 90 MME (morphine milligram equivalents), which was widely seen as a hard limit. It is replaced with cautionary language about doses above 50 MME being “more likely to yield diminishing returns.”  

“There are tweaks, but I think they are tweaks that are meaningful. That doesn’t mean its not still built on a rotten core,” says Kate Nicholson, Executive Director of the National Pain Advocacy Center (NPAC), who belonged to an independent advisory panel that advised the CDC to drop all references to MME.

Nicholson is concerned the 50 MME threshold – which is mentioned two dozen times in the revised guideline – will be misapplied as the new hard limit.

“They still overly focus on MME’s,” she told PNN. “They do qualify it whenever they mention it, but it’s still there, it’s there a lot, and it’s aligned strongly with risk. My concerns are misapplication, even though they say repeatedly ‘Do not apply this as a strict threshold.’”

Nicholson is also concerned about the guideline’s expansion beyond chronic pain (pain lasting three months or more) to include people with short-term acute pain from trauma or surgery, as well as “sub-acute” pain lasting one to three months.

“It’s good to cover all pain and not just single out chronic pain. So in theory I think it’s fine, but in practice, given that they acknowledge again and again the problems of the 2016 guideline. Usually, you check your safety features on the airplane before you expand the fleet. And they didn’t. They did it all at once,” she said. “I also have concerns that it’s a clinical practice guideline written mostly by non-clinicians and by people who are not experts in pain. And it’s now going to cover how all pain should be treated?”

For some patient advocates, no amount of revisions are acceptable. They want the CDC guideline revoked.

“False claims of one-size-fits-all dose thresholds are alive and well in this final draft. More than ever, I am convinced that the CDC must be restricted by law from issuing practice guidelines of this type,” says patient advocate Richard “Red” Lawhern. “It doubles down on lies and cherry-picked research intended to further suppress opioid prescribing at the expense of undertreating patients and driving clinicians out of pain management practice.”

Most of the mainstream media coverage of the revised guideline portrayed it as a weaker or softened version of the 2016 guideline. That is puzzling to Andrew Kolodny, MD, founder and president of the anti-opioid activist group Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing (PROP), who believes the new guideline is “much stronger” than the original.

“Press coverage of the CDC opioid guideline is wacky,” Kolodny wrote on Twitter. “CDC issued a guideline much stronger than the 2016 version (high dose defined as 50 MME/day instead of 90) but press headlines say CDC softened guideline.”

Reversing the Damage

Many patient advocates believe it will be hard to unwind the damage caused by the 2016 guideline to patients, pain management practices, and the healthcare system in general.

“Many laws, regulations, and policies were implemented from the rigid application of the 2016 opioid dosage thresholds. I believe this means many physicians may remain reluctant to prescribe opioids when indicated for chronic pain, and patients may continue to find access to treatment a challenge,” said Dr. Lynn Webster, Senior Fellow at the Center for U.S. Policy and past president of the American Academy of Pain Medicine

“To reverse the damage, the CDC could take an active and vocal public role in publicizing the statements about the guideline not being a law, regulation or policy. The agency should make sure that governmental and enforcement entities know there’s a new CDC statement on these matters.”

Chris Jones said the CDC would monitor how the revised guideline is implemented by states, insurers and others to prevent further misapplication. But he was vague about how it would be done, saying it needs to be handled on a case-by-case basis and while recognizing that “states do what states do.” The CDC has no legal authority to enforce its recommendations.

 “As with any clinical practice guideline, the work doesn’t stop today. It really starts as we engage with the clinical community, as we engage with patient organizations with educational opportunities. Certainly engaging with insurers and others to say, ‘Here’s the latest evidence about the range of treatment options that can be effective,’” he told PNN. “But we’re still working through, from a policy perspective when we see misapplication, how to respond to that.”

Jones said he would be speaking next month to the National Conference of State Legislatures about the revised guideline and to reinforce the need for individualized patient care. He and the other guideline co-authors also published an op/od in The New England Journal of Medicine that cautions providers about misapplying the CDC’s recommendations.

Webster thinks the CDC’s efforts to combat addiction and overdoses should be refocused on illicit fentanyl and other street drugs, which are involved in the vast majority of drugs deaths. In 2021, nearly 108,000 Americans died from overdoses, a record number.

“I think it is important to remember that the goal of the guideline was to reduce the number of overdose deaths by reducing the opioid supply or amount prescribed. It hasn’t worked out that way,” Webster said. “Over the past decade, opioid prescribing has plummeted, but the number of overdoses has skyrocketed. The CDC should now focus on the cause of most opioid-related overdose deaths, which is to bring attention to the social and economic factors that create the demand for so many Americans to escape the pain of living.” 

Evidence Used to Justify CDC Opioid Guideline ‘No Longer Present’

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Anti-opioid activists and public health officials have long argued that opioid “overprescribing” fueled the overdose crisis in the United States, causing drug deaths to surge to record levels.

“This rise is directly correlated with increased prescribing for chronic pain,” Dr. Jane Ballantyne, then-president of Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing (PROP), wrote in a 2015 letter to the National Institutes of Health.

That claim was repeated the following year by the CDC when the agency released its controversial opioid guideline. “Overprescribing opioids – largely for chronic pain – is a key driver of America’s drug overdose epidemic,” then-CDC director Dr. Thomas Frieden said in a news release.   

But a new analysis debunks the overprescribing myth, finding the “direct correlations” cited by Frieden, Ballantyne and others are no longer valid, if they ever were.

In a study recently published in Frontiers of Pain Research, independent researchers Larry Aubry and B. Thomas Carr examined opioid prescribing trends and overdose deaths from 2010 to 2019, using the same data sources that the CDC guideline is based on.

“The direct correlations used to justify the CDC guideline… are no longer present,” they reported.

Aubry and Carr found that opioid prescribing, when measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MME), was in steep decline years before the guideline was even released. That trend accelerated even further when regulators, insurers and healthcare providers started following the CDC’s recommendations.

If the overprescribing theory were true, you would expect drug deaths to go down as opioid sales did. But in subsequent years, overdoses linked to prescription opioids stayed flat and drug deaths surged even higher. In research terms, that is known as a “negative correlation” -- a trend not supported by facts.

Looking at data from all 50 states, Aubry and Carr found “significant negative correlation” in 38 states between overdoses and prescription opioids, and a positive correlation in only 2 states. In 10 states, there appeared to be no relationship at all. That calls into question ones of the primary recommendations of the CDC guideline; that daily opioid doses not exceed 90 MME.

“This recommendation is not supported by the available data. Regression analyses of (total opioid deaths, opioid overdose deaths, opioid treatment admissions, and prescription opioid sales) among patients receiving doses of at least 90 MME/day show significant negative relationships, indicating that lower (prescription opioid sales) in this high-dosage cohort do not correspond to lower death rates,” Aubry and Carr reported.

The CDC estimates that over 107,000 people died of overdoses in 2021, well above the 63,600 drug deaths reported in 2016, the year the guideline was released.

Negative Correlation Between Overdoses and Opioid Prescribing

sOURCE: FRONTIERS OF PAIN RESEARCH

Patient Outcomes Not Being Monitored

Even more concerning is that the CDC does not appear to be tracking the impact of its 2016 guideline on pain patients, even as it prepares a long-delayed update to the guideline. As PNN has reported, the CDC ignored warnings from its own consultants that the agency “should consider conducting more research” on patients, many of whom were abruptly tapered or abandoned by their doctors after the guideline’s release.

“Reasonable judgment would dictate tracking and reporting of chronic pain patient outcomes (deaths, suicides, returns in benefits, reported pain, function, etc.) for individuals since the guideline or the guideline update. However, there appears to be no publicly available evidence that a monitoring process is required or is planned to measure and confirm outcomes,” Aubry and Carr wrote.

PROP is not following the data either. In a recent debate, PROP board member Adriane Fugh-Berman claimed that pain patients addicted to prescription opioids were still fueling the overdose epidemic, even though illicit fentanyl and other street drugs are linked to the vast majority of deaths.

“Those patients went to the street. They got addicted to heroin. The reason those deaths went up is because the illicit supply of opioids has become laced with fentanyl and has become highly dangerous,” Fugh-Berman said, without citing any evidence. “It’s not that prescription opioids have nothing to do with it.  Many patients started on prescription opioids ended up on the streets looking for heroin. They’re dying because the illicit opioid products have become extremely dangerous. That’s what’s killing people.”

Fugh-Berman is not an unbiased observer. She and at least five other PROP board members have testified as paid expert witnesses in opioid litigation cases, making as much as $850 an hour for their testimony blaming drug makers for the opioid crisis.

A recent analysis of overdose deaths in 2020 found that prescription opioids ranked well behind illicit fentanyl, alcohol, cocaine, methamphetamine and heroin as the leading cause of drug deaths.   

At least one critic of opioid prescribing feels it’s time to change the focus on why so many Americans are overdosing. Beth Macy, who wrote the best-selling book “Dopesick,” says drug use has changed. 

“At this point, too much attention is focused on stemming the oversupply of prescription opioids. We now have a generation of drug users that started with heroin and fentanyl.”

— Beth Macy, author of "Dopesick"

“At this point, too much attention is focused on stemming the oversupply of prescription opioids,” Macy writes in her new book, ‘Raising Lazarus.’ “We now have a generation of drug users that started with heroin and fentanyl.”

As for the CDC, a spokesperson tells PNN the agency won’t publish its guideline revision until late this year, nearly seven years after the original guideline was released. 

“CDC is currently in the process of revising the draft update to the 2016 Guideline based on comments received during the public comment period and peer review. We anticipate the final Guideline will be released later this year,” the spokesperson said.

I’m Living Proof That Effective Pain Management Can Heal

By Heather Grace

My journey into what would become debilitating pain began at age 19, when my neck was injured in a head-on collision caused by a drunk driver. Being a backseat passenger in an older car meant there were no headrests.

I healed as best I could after the accident with chiropractic care and exercise. I was young and told myself I’d be fine, but sensed I wasn’t quite the same as before.

Nearly a decade of work in the IT field worsened the severity of my injury, due to faulty ergonomics. Between the severe pain and the horrors of the workers compensation system, it began to feel like I was in free fall. At my first visit with a prominent pain management specialist, I was told, “Normal is out the window for you.”

It was the worst thing I’d ever heard, so I began sobbing. What he said wasn’t actually cruel, it was honest. He could see that my body was broken by work comp care that included two botched neurosurgeries and one spinal discectomy-fusion surgery that came far too late to be a good thing. 

I was left with intractable pain and nerve damage, which would be diagnosed as Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) Type II. The CRPS is not regional at all, but spread to the whole body, thanks to the impact on my spinal column and brain.

I would later also learn that I was born with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, a progressive connective tissue disease.

HEATHER GRACE

Intractable Pain Syndrome (IPS) isn’t well understood in mainstream medicine because it’s not very common. In fact, even after working in Continuing Medical Education for 10 years, I’d never heard of IPS until I was diagnosed with it. I didn’t know that it was possible to be in severe unceasing pain.

People with IPS experience major health problems throughout their lives because of the physical and psychological toll that pain takes on the brain and body. Treatment for this complex and disabling condition must be taken seriously and done correctly.

A New Future

After all this was explained to me by my doctor, I realized that to move forward with my life, I had to stop pinning my hopes on returning someday to “normal.” I had to grieve the loss of my former life. Once I did, a door was opened to a meaningful future for me.

Thanks to amazing treatment with a physician who also helped me focus on the future, I’m living again in a way I didn’t think was possible when I first sat down with my doctor in 2006. He found the right treatments for me, which included opioid pain medication.  

I’ve reduced my medication dose slowly over the years. I’m now taking less than one sixth the pain medication I started with. That’s because I’ve experienced neurogenesis, a form of healing in my nervous system.

It is possible for people like me to heal, albeit very slowly over time when they get the care that they need. Despite the severity of my conditions, I’m doing well. Contrary to popular opinion, patients who get the proper dose of pain meds don’t always require more and more medication. While some patients’ dosages stay the same, some of us are able to lower our doses when our health improves.  

I’ve come so far. In 2004, when I left the job I loved awaiting two major surgeries, I thought I’d never work again. But I was able to obtain a full-time job (with benefits!) in 2020. It required a major effort, but I got here because I had a good foundation of long-term effective pain management, which lessened the impact of pain on my overall wellness.

Opioid medication does not define my care, nor my life. Pain meds are merely a tool I’ve used to get well. Every patient should have access to individualized pain care with the treatment options that best work for them. It’s crucial for patients if they’re ever going to see their health improve.

I won’t lie, it’s been a struggle and I have had my share of setbacks too. Yet I know without question that pain medication was required in my case. It made a serious difference in my overall health and paved the way to my future too.  

Effective pain management for someone with IPS is as vital as care for any other serious illness. You’d never tell a diabetic that an arbitrary maximum dose of insulin was all they were allowed to have. Why are pain patients any different? None of us asked for the pain, nor do we like having to take a prescription drug that’s so socially maligned. These judgments exist nowhere outside of pain management. Why are people in pain treated so differently and with such suspicion?  

The fact is, when the CDC’s opioid prescribing guideline was released in 2016, the consequences were far-reaching and dire. Countless patients have needlessly suffered and died because they lost access to opioids or were tapered, based on the guideline’s recommendations. Many of those deaths have been due to the pain finally overtaking the body. Other patients have chosen to end their pain via suicide. Imagine being so ill that you were forced to make such a choice!  

Without access to effective individualized treatment by physicians whose options aren’t stifled by a system that doesn’t understand pain, many more people with serious diagnoses will develop intractable pain.

Those outside the treatment setting have no business undermining patients’ pain care protocols. They simply don’t have the knowledge to be involved on that level. That goes for the CDC, DEA, state medical boards and insurance companies — along with anyone else who gets in the way of pain patients having effective care. 

Sadly, I know it’s the workers compensation system that led to the severity of my illness. I got an extensive education on how an overburdened system not designed for people with serious healthcare needs can result in disability.  

Please don’t jeopardize the future of an entire branch of medicine any further. There are human lives on the line. Everyone knows someone living with chronic pain. Make the changes needed to continue treating people like me — people whose lives don’t have to end because they have a serious injury or illness. It’s crucial to roll back the damage done by the CDC guideline before we all lose access to pain management forever.

Heather Grace is a patient, advocate and member of For Grace’s Board of Governors. She’s worked for health-focused nonprofits most of her career & developed Continuing Medical Education (CME) for nearly a decade. Heather lives with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome II and the genetic condition Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome. Heather has a website on pain issues called Intractable Pain Journal.

Class Action Lawsuit by Pain Patient Against CVS Moves Forward

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

A federal judge has ruled that a class action lawsuit against CVS may continue over the pharmacy chain’s refusal to fill high dose opioid prescriptions for a Florida woman.

Edith Fuog, a breast cancer survivor who lives with trigeminal neuralgia, lupus, arthritis and other chronic pain conditions, filed suit against CVS in 2020, alleging the company discriminated against her and violated the American with Disabilities Act (ADA). Her complaint was filed in federal court in Rhode Island, where CVS has its corporate headquarters.

The lawsuit alleges that CVS pharmacists refused to fill her opioid prescriptions nearly 30 times because the daily doses exceeded 90 morphine milligram equivalents (MME), a threshold considered risky under the 2016 CDC opioid guideline. Although the guideline is voluntary, many healthcare providers have adopted it as a mandatory policy.   

This week Judge William Smith rejected a CVS motion to dismiss the lawsuit, essentially ruling that because Fuog needed a higher dose to treat pain from her medical conditions, she was legally qualified as a disabled person.

“Ms. Fuog has pleaded sufficient facts for the Court to conclude that it is plausible that prescriptions over the threshold are generally denied meaningful access to this benefit, and also disproportionally or predominantly disabled,” Judge Smith wrote in his opinion.

“She has alleged a specific dose-and-duration threshold and provided well-pleaded facts supporting a strong correlation between those over the threshold and disability. While she will have much to prove as the case progressed, these pleadings push past the plausibility bar.”

Judge Smith agreed to drop CVS Caremark as a defendant in the lawsuit, saying there wasn’t a clear enough allegation against the company’s pharmacy benefit manager. But the rest of the potentially precedent setting case will continue.   

“He basically said there’s no doubt that she’s disabled. And there’s no doubt that there’s discrimination going on,” Fuog told PNN.  “It’s a huge step. And we’ve got all this in his own words, telling us this is real, it’s happening, it’s unfair and it’s discrimination.”

“We are very pleased with the Court’s ruling and look forward to moving ahead and litigating the claims on Edith’s behalf,” said Scott Hirsch, Fuog’s lawyer. “We are always happy to speak with other individuals who are being denied the filling of their legitimate opioid prescriptions. They can go to the website we have setup and get more information.”

Longtime Problem for Patients

Pain patients across the U.S. have complained for years about pharmacies refusing to fill their opioid prescriptions or reducing them to lower doses. It’s also not uncommon for patients to encounter delays and flimsy excuses about not filling a prescription, such as a pharmacist claiming a particular opioid was out of stock.

The CVS case and a similar lawsuit against Walgreen’s in California are believed to be the first class action cases to address the problem. Class action suits allow plaintiffs to prosecute a case in civil court and receive compensation for their injuries on behalf of others.

“I was thrilled with this opinion. I think it’s very well-reasoned and applies the ADA appropriately,” said Kate Nicholson, a civil rights lawyer who at one time worked for the Justice Department and helped draft federal regulations under the ADA. She is now Executive Director of the National Pain Advocacy Center (NPAC).

“I mean it’s ridiculous that this woman went to 30 different pharmacies and couldn’t get her prescription refilled. That is highly problematic,” Nicholson told PNN.

Ironically, CVS and several other pharmacy chains face multiple lawsuits for filling too many opioid prescriptions and allegedly contributing to the nation’s opioid crisis. CVS recently reached a $484 million settlement with the state of Florida to end opioid litigation there.

Pharmacists have a legal right to refuse to fill prescriptions they consider suspicious or inappropriate, but should first take steps to verify whether a prescription is legitimate and medically necessary, such as calling the prescribing doctor. Fuog’s lawsuit alleges that CVS pharmacists refused to call her doctor or even look at her medical records.

“Which is why I think the judge was very careful on this case to say CVS has a perfectly legitimate basis for looking at high dose prescribing,” said Nicholson. “They just can’t do it in this arbitrary way.”

Drug Addiction Is the Problem, Not Prescription Opioids

By Christine Kucera, Guest Columnist

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is the leading national public health institute of the United States. The agency is responsible for protecting the public from health and safety threats. 

In my opinion, the CDC has no business writing clinical guidelines! Medical guidelines for healthcare/disease management, medication management, and clinical decision making should be developed, reviewed and approved by a diverse team of clinical subject area specialists and key stakeholders, including medical specialists, medical groups, advisory teams, advocates and patients. Not regulatory agencies!

The 2016 CDC opioid guideline, as currently written, has harmed and damaged millions of lives, and caused unspeakable suffering. In effect, the CDC sanctioned torture by failing to promptly address and correct the negative impact of its guideline on individual patient care, addiction and pain management treatment and resources.

The CDC has clearly overstepped its authority by creating a guideline meant to regulate the use of prescription opioids. Any regulatory measures which prevent patients from accessing prescription opioids as indicated for their health and well-being are unethical and should be reconsidered, if not totally withdrawn.

The CDC continues to propagate the false narrative that any patients requiring prescription opioids for any type of pain are or will become addicts. And it continues to claim — without any evidence — that if opioid prescriptions are limited in quantity, type, duration and dose, there will be a reduction in addiction, overdose and death. The facts indicate otherwise. Overdoses are at record high levels.

The True Causes of Addiction

Substance addiction exists because our government has failed to address its true causes, which include poor access to addiction treatment, unethical pain treatment, lack of quality care standards across medical institutions, and lack of legislative laws that protect patients from suffering needlessly. 

Addiction is caused by preventable and manageable health disparities, untreated and undertreated mental and physical suffering, genetic metabolic variability, lack of resources, lack of all-inclusive healthcare insurance, lack of provider managed pain care, lack of treatment centers, lack of access to appropriately prescribed medications, lack of drug monitoring systems, lack of access to mental health and pain care providers, lack of timely access to a comprehensive network of providers, and lack of individualized care. 

Maybe if the CDC actually focused on the above health and safety issues, we would have guidance on solving the real problems. The CDC has failed miserably to recognize that individual pain care is as unique as the patient who is suffering in pain. Every single person that has pain seeks relief.

Relief comes in many different forms, both healthy and unhealthy. These forms of relief may be self-directed and/or medically managed by clinical staff and providers, and includes exercise, yoga, rest, mobilization, heat/ice therapy, massage, mindfulness, acupuncture, Chinese herbal medicine, bio-feedback, diet, weight loss, surgeries, water therapy, bicycling, strength/weight training, martial arts, immunotherapy, TENS, anti-inflammatories, anti-seizure medication, muscle relaxants, antidepressants, biologicals, medical/recreational cannabis, CBD, kratom, prescription opioids, illicit/illegal drugs and alcohol — to name a few. 

Every Patient is Different

The journey each patient in pain takes is individual. The pain you've experienced and lived with is different from mine and everyone else’s.  

The terms “acute pain” and “chronic pain” are also misleading and are part of the false narrative. Pain is a symptom. Its management depends on its physical and/or mental cause, not how long it lasts. Pain is the body's way of sending up a red flag that something is not right.

Duration means nothing in the world of pain, as every minute of the day is different in type, in location and in intensity. Pain goes through cycles, and no person experiences pain the same way.  

Until the individuals who wrote this God awful, evil guideline experience pain that is unrelenting, agonizing, non-stop, 24/7 for their entire life, they should back off the false narrative, go back into their non-medical cave, and leave the medical decision making up to the actual physicians who are trained to manage pain with all the tools available and at any quantity required by a patient.  

What the CDC should be addressing are the sources of suffering, identifying at-risk individuals and providing a framework for implementing resources and systems of care that are fluid and adaptive to the unique circumstances of each individual.  

There are too many outstanding questions and issues which also continue to impact patients and providers. What are the FDA and DEA’s roles and responsibilities? How do their policies meet the objectives of the CDC guideline to reduce addiction, overdose and death? What impact do they have on medical providers treating patients in pain? 

Addiction is the public health issue requiring CDC input, not the utilization of prescription opioids for pain treatment. 

Christine Kucera is an intractable pain patient survivor of over 30 years. She lives with reactive psoriatic arthritis, spondylitis, polyarthritis, sacroiliitis, degenerative disc disease, dermatomyositis, mixed connective tissue disease, psoriasis, lupus, spinal radiculopathy, thoracic outlet syndrome, endometriosis stage IV, and other painful conditions.

Prior to becoming disabled, Christine was a healthcare research systems developer and analyst for federally funded CMS, AHRQ, and NIH grants and programs. 

Mistrust Shadows CDC Over New Opioid Dose Guidance

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Pain patients and healthcare providers are giving mixed reviews to proposed changes to the CDC opioid guideline, according to a large new survey that found many are skeptical the revisions will make doctors more willing to prescribe opioids. Others fear the revised draft could lead to even lower and ineffective doses of opioids being prescribed.

Over 2,500 patients, providers and caregivers responded to PNN’s survey on the revised opioid guideline, which is intended to undo some of the damage caused by the agency’s 2016 guideline.

States, insurers, regulators and law enforcement made many of the original guideline’s voluntary recommendations mandatory, resulting in millions of patients being abruptly tapered or taken off opioids. Fearing scrutiny or even prosecution for “overprescribing” opioids, some doctors stopped treating pain altogether.

Like the original guideline, the revised draft still discourages the use of opioids, but clearly states the CDC’s recommendations are intended “to support, not supplant, clinical judgment” and “should not be applied as inflexible standards of care.”

When asked if the revised 211-page guideline is an improvement over the original, only four out of ten people (39%) said it was “improved” or “much improved.”  Most respondents said it was about the same or even worse.

“It is very long and involved but seems like a bait and switch. Starts out speaking to the damage done by 2016 guideline. Then seems to restrict needed medication even more,” a patient told us. 

“Both the original and the revised guidelines are fraught with politics. Nothing's changed. The guidelines are still as harmful as they were when they were published in 2016. No appreciable improvements have been made,” said another. 

IS THE REVISED GUIDELINE AN IMPROVEMENT OVER 2016 GUIDELINE?

“It looks like a step in the right direction, but I'm not sure. I don't think the CDC should be interfering between doctors and their patients,” another patient said.  “My current doctor had his practice raided in a Gestapo-like action that found zero violations. CDC and DEA need to back off and let doctors treat their patients.”

50 MME Perceived As New Hard Limit

The 2016 guideline strongly encouraged doctors not to write prescriptions that exceed doses of 90 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per day. That 90 MME limit has been dropped from the revised draft, but doctors are still urged to be cautious about going over 50 MME because higher doses have “diminishing returns in benefits relative to risks.”

The language about 50 MME is essentially unchanged from the 2016 guideline, but many patients and providers are worried about it. Over 97% of survey respondents said they are “somewhat concerned” or “very concerned” that 50 MME will be seen as the new hard limit for doses, a level many consider inadequate for pain relief.

“The CDC is assuming that, by reducing the misapplied 90 MME standard to 50 MME, it will reduce misapplication of the standard. Faulty logic. It will, in fact, make it even harder for pain patients to be prescribed more than 50 MME, and the result will be more people in more pain and an increase in pain patient suicides,” one patient told us.

“There should be NO MME! It is too specific to use for everyone. We shouldn't be treated all the same. Each person's pain is different. It was bad enough when it was 90, to now reduce it to 50 MME is just awful,” another patient wrote.  

“50 MME will be the new 90 MME. That’s the crux of it, despite the flowery fenestration and hollow words that 2016 gave the wrong impression. They are merely patronizing us, while lowering the guidelines for how much doctors will actually prescribe,” said another.

ARE YOU CONCERNED 50 MME WILL BE SEEN AS THE NEW HARD LIMIT FOR OPIOIDS?

“There should be no specific numbers concerning daily dosages. This should be between a patient and their doctor. All of the state laws that control opioid medications need to be overturned and the CDC needs to stop attempting to practice medicine,” a patient said.

‘Leave Pain Management to the Experts’

People are also skeptical that the revisions will ease doctors’ concerns about prescribing opioids. Nearly two-thirds (61%) said the changes won’t make doctors more willing to prescribe the drugs. 

“I'm glad they are changing, but I think the damage has already been done. My doctor took me off pain meds completely and life has been a living hell! Now that he's done that, I don't think he will be open to prescribing them again no matter how many chronic pain issues I have!” said a patient. 

“My doctors took me off pain meds because they were afraid of losing their license and they still are. I sent (them) the link to the new guidelines and they still will not do anything for my pain,” another patient said. “One doctor said, ‘If we give pain meds to our patients who need it, CDC will still be after us for giving pain meds so we can’t take that chance.’” 

DO YOU THINK REVISIONS WILL MAKE DOCTORS MORE WILLING TO PRESCRIBE OPIOIDS?

“I think the CDC needs to keep his nose out of providers business. I’ve been practicing pain management for 22 years,” a doctor told us. “The CDC guidelines of 2016 have ruined untold lives because they stuck their nose somewhere they shouldn’t have. Leave pain management to the experts and let them decide what each patient needs based on their individual condition.” 

Guideline Expansion

Patients and providers are a bit more receptive about the guideline being expanded to include recommendations for treating short-term acute pain (55%), as well as a handful of specific pain conditions, such as low back pain and migraine (53%).  

Patients with severe constant pain — known an intractable pain — feel left out of the guideline. The word “intractable” is not even mentioned in the draft revision. While some types of severe pain, like cancer pain and sickle cell pain, are specifically excluded from the guideline, others are not.

“I wish that consideration would be given for patients who have intractable pain and have already jumped through the hoops of therapy and other treatments and have found that they didn’t help. It is beyond discouraging to have to repeat trials of treatments that never work for that particular patient,” said one patient.

“There is no difference in cancer and non-cancer pain. Pain is pain. If they’re going to include any conditions (which I don’t think they should) they should recognize rare and incurable illnesses, not just low back pain, sickle cell, and cancer,” another patient wrote. 

End Mandatory Policies

Large majorities also think the CDC needs to do a better job tracking the impact of its guideline on patients (95%) and making sure it is not used to create mandatory policies (96%).

The American Medical Association has even recommended that the CDC undertake a “a national marketing and communications campaign” to make clear to law enforcement and healthcare providers that the revised guideline should not be used like its predecessor to adopt rules that replace individualized patient care. 

Many of our survey respondents agree. Without the elimination of laws and policies that dictate how pain should be treated, no amount of revisions to the guideline will not undo the damage the CDC’s recommendations have already caused. 

“It should be made clear to the doctors willing, but currently afraid, to prescribe opioids now for fear of fines, loss of income and even jail, that they won't be penalized for properly caring for their patients,” said one patient. “These doctors feel their livelihood has been threatened just for doing their job, which is to help people in pain. They are no longer doing that.” 

For more survey findings, including whether respondents think the CDC guideline should be revised or revoked, click here. You can see the full survey results here.

The CDC recently close a public comment period on the guideline revisions. Over 5,400 comments have been received and publicly posted, which you can read here. The CDC is not expected to adopt the final version of its revised guideline until late this year.  

Too Little, Too Late: Patients and Providers Say Changes to CDC Opioid Guideline Inadequate

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Proposed changes to the CDC’s opioid prescribing guideline are inadequate and will not undo the damage caused to patients and the practice of pain management, according to a large new survey by Pain News Network.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released a long-awaited draft revision of its 2016 guideline in February, giving healthcare providers more flexibility in how they manage pain with opioids. Although voluntary, the original guideline was widely misapplied as a rigid “standard of care” by many states, insurers, doctors and law enforcement, causing millions of patients to be taken off opioids or tapered to lower doses.

The revised guideline states that “opioids can be essential medications for the management of pain” and encourages doctors to use their own best judgement when prescribing them. But many patients and providers believe the changes don’t go far enough and may even make the crisis in pain care worse.

“Appreciate the effort, but too little too late. These revisions are like trying to prevent disaster by course correcting the Titanic after it hit the iceberg,” one patient told us. “The revisions offer no protection against overzealous DEA interference and prosecution, and are meaningless in court. Until the draconian laws spawned by the guidelines are changed, things will only continue to get worse.”

“I believe it is a small step in the right direction, though the damage has already been done. The doctors who truly care about their patients and would like to help them are still terrified of the potential repercussions from the governing bodies,” another patient said.

“In 45 years of treating patients with pain, I have never seen it so difficult for patients to have their reports of pain taken seriously and get access to pain treatment,” a doctor said. “Patients often feel treated like addicts, and have had many professionals and family members supporting that erroneous and stigmatizing label.”

‘I Barely Leave the House’

Over 2,500 patients, providers and caregivers in the U.S. responded to PNN’s survey, the vast majority (94%) identifying themselves as patients with either chronic or short-term acute pain.

Over half the patients (57%) rated the quality of their pain care as poor or very poor. Only one in five (20%) rated it good or very good.

This was the fifth survey we’ve conducted on the CDC guideline. Like the others, people expressed strong opinions about the agency’s recommendations and how they’ve impacted pain care.

“My pain medication was involuntarily reduced by 75% since the the last guideline was published,” a patient told us. “Now I barely leave the house. I can't do my physical therapy due to excessive pain.”

HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE CURRENT QUALITY OF YOUR PAIN CARE?

“The 2016 guidelines caused me to have to go on disability, spend 20 hours a day in bed due to severe back pain, and sell a bank consulting company that I had run successfully for 20 years. The CDC needs to get out of pain medicine,” another patient said.

Should CDC Have Opioid Guideline?

When asked if the CDC should even have guidelines for pain management and opioid prescribing, eight out of ten respondents (84%) said no. Many said the agency overstepped its authority.

“It is outside the CDC's charter and purpose to publish opioid guidelines. If an opioid guideline is needed, that would be the FDA's responsibility. Why is our government even allowing the CDC to do this? They are expending resources on something that is unnecessary and outside of their area of responsibility,” a patient wrote.

“The "D" in "CDC' is for "disease." Pain is not a disease. CDC should stick to its mission,” said another patient. 

“The CDC should not be allowed to regulate pain medications. The CDC conveniently made a disease to justify getting involved in an area that was not their area to regulate. The guidelines were biased against chronic pain. The (guideline) panel was biased by people with preconceived ideas,” a provider wrote. 

‘Made Each Day a Living Hell’

Asked if the 2016 opioid guideline improved the quality of pain care or made it worse, nearly nine out of ten respondents (88%) said pain care in the U.S. was significantly worse. Only 2% believe the guideline improved pain care. 

“I had a friend that was seeing a pain management physician, and he was on high dose opiates for 10 years due to a car accident, and because of the 2016 guidelines, his doctor became very fearful and took him off his meds,” a patient told us. “That person committed suicide.”

“CDC regulations may have saved the lives of some addiction-prone people, but it's made each day a living hell for millions of us with progressive chronic pain,” another patient said.

“The damage has been done. Patients are still dead, physicians are still terrified, and these deaths and loss of practice were totally unnecessary. It is a disgusting example of ill-informed government over reach,” said another.

DID 2016 GUIDELINE IMPROVE PAIN CARE OR MAKE IT WORSE?

‘Pain Drove Me to Street Drugs’

Perhaps the most damning assessment of the 2016 guideline is that it made the opioid crisis worse – an opinion shared by nearly eight out of ten survey respondents (78%). When denied access to opioids, some patients have turned to street drugs.

“Chronic pain drove me to use street drugs, including fentanyl, when all I needed was a doctor to prescribe a safe medicine for me,” a patient told us. “It's messed up I have to do this for relief.”

“Patients know about their pain, doctors know their patients, the CDC does not know individual patients. Making it harder to get much needed medications is what causes people to try and obtain opioids illegally,” said a patient.

“People in chronic pain who cannot get relief from doctors are turning to street drugs - and THEN getting hooked. The CDC is CAUSING drug addiction,” wrote another patient.

“The people who benefit from the CDC guidelines are lawyers, politicians and drug dealers. The drug dealers can sit back and rake in the money while the CDC, lawyers and politicians do their work for them.”

DO YOU THINK THE 2016 GUIDELINE MADE THE OPIOID CRISIS WORSE?

 ‘Revoke the Guidelines’

What should be done with the 2016 guideline? Should it be revised? Can it be fixed? Nearly two-thirds of respondents (63%) believe it should be completely revoked or withdrawn. About 36% believe changes are needed to make opioid medication more accessible.

“The CDC needs to completely revoke the 2016 guidelines and let trained professionals treat their patients for pain. Unfortunately, some of the damage that was done is irreversible and some patients have lost their lives as a consequence, and that lies squarely on the shoulders and consciousnesses of the CDC,” a provider told us.

“DESTROY IT NOW! No updates are needed,” a patient wrote. “Just get rid of these guidelines completely and get out of the middle, coming between a doctor and his pain patient, as well as the patient and their pharmacy.”

“Revoke the guidelines and revoke the CDC’s ability to have anything to do with medications, leave that to the FDA and doctors. Also revoke the DEA’s ability to prosecute and/or harass doctors and make them focus on drug dealers and cartels,” another patient wrote.

WHAT SHOULD BE DONE WITH 2016 GUIDELINE?

‘CDC Has Lost All Credibility’

Given all the problems created by the 2016 guideline and the lengthy delay in revising it, many people have lost faith in the CDC — once one of the most trusted government agencies in the U.S. Asked if the CDC could be trusted to handle the revision of the opioid guideline in an unbiased and scientific manner, nearly 96% said no.

“I do not and will never trust them. This revision is nothing more than putting lipstick on a pig,” a patient said.

“The CDC has lost all credibility with me. They lie, falsify records to suit their argument, pick and choose things in studies to support their argument, and they have anti-opioid zealots writing these guidelines. Clear conflict of interest! CDC and DEA need to get the hell out of my doctor-patient relationship!” said another patient.

“The CDC were warned their Guidelines would harm patients, and they moved forward anyway. They refused to monitor harm to patients or acknowledge it. The CDC's unethical behavior continues over and over at shocking levels. They have broken the public trust over and over. Nothing they've written can be trusted after these deliberate and intentional unethical choices,” a patient wrote.

For more survey findings, including what respondents think about the CDC’s new guidance about doses, click here. You can see the full survey results here.

Deadline Nears for Public Comments on Revised CDC Opioid Guideline

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

The public comment period on the revised draft of the CDC’s opioid prescribing guideline ends Monday, April 11th. So far, over 4,200 comments have been submitted in the Federal Register. You can leave a comment and read the ones already submitted by clicking here. A final revised guideline is not expected to be released by the CDC until late this year.

Like the original guideline, the revised version still maintains that opioids should not be used as a first line or routine therapy for pain, but takes a more flexible approach to dosing. Providers are urged to weigh the individual needs of each patient and not take a one-size-fits-all approach to pain care.

“It’s important to point out that the guideline is not final and the step that we’re at now is a real critical point in the process to wrestle with and get feedback,” Christopher Jones, PharmD, Acting Director of the CDC’s National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, told PNN in February.

“And that’s why it’s important that we hear from readers of Pain News Network to get feedback, to get that experience, so as we move toward a final guideline, we can incorporate that feedback. We hope that insurers, medical community, law enforcement and others will also review the guideline and provide feedback.”

Does 50 MME replace 90 MME?

Perhaps the most controversial change in the opioid guideline is the elimination of dose thresholds. The original guideline strongly encouraged providers not to exceed doses of 90 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per day. That 90 MME limit has been dropped from the revised draft, but providers are still urged to be cautious about going over 50 MME because higher doses have “diminishing returns in benefits relative to risks.”

That change has led to significant confusion about what CDC is trying to do. Many patients are concerned that 50 MME will be seen as the new recommended limit, a dose they consider low for severe pain.

“Does the 50 MMEs replace the 90 MMEs? This is asking for more and more suicides. Much of the proposed guidelines are the same except you removed 90 MMEs and replaced it with 50 MMEs. Go back to the beginning and start over,” Pamela Hoard wrote in her comment.

“It is ridiculous to put a numerical number, such as 50 MME/day, to a risk/benefit outcome when there is no scientific evidence to support MME's,” wrote Joe Benotz, who said he was a pharmacist. “Using unvalidated MME to guide dosing opioid pain meds has in the past led to significant harms to pain patients. Continued use of MME numbers will cause more harm in the future.”

“I'm a doctor in Michigan who has lost his license because of the 90 MME requirement. It doesn't matter if you add caveats, prosecutors see a limit and it becomes the law. The 50 MME ‘suggestion’ is even worse,” wrote Jonathan Roberston.

The anti-opioid activist group Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing (PROP) posted a letter in the Federal Register supporting many of the guideline changes, including the cautionary language about exceeding 50 MME. PROP continues to maintain that long-term use of opioids is too risky.

“Available evidence indicates modest benefits of opioids for acute pain relative to placebo, while benefits for chronic pain have not been shown,” PROP said. “New evidence also demonstrates significant risks of high dose opioids (>50 MME/day) and shows that alternatives to opioids often provide equal or superior benefit with a markedly better safety profile. These are important findings which PROP fully supports being widely disseminated to medical professionals and to the public.”

Medical Societies Weigh In

Other medical societies and physician groups generally support the guideline changes, but with important caveats. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) is concerned about the CDC making new recommendations for treating postoperative pain that are based on “inconsistent” evidence from a small number of clinical trials.

“The agency fails to recognize the complexities around the many different types of surgery that require different forms of pain control, especially that some patient populations may need more pain relief and different therapies than others,” the ASA said in a letter that basically told the CDC to stay in its lane.

“ASA recommends that the agency note in the updated Guideline that clinicians defer to professional medical society guidelines and standards of care for surgical procedures. Medical specialty societies, including ASA, are the experts in perioperative pain care, including postsurgical pain, and are best suited to develop clinical guidelines in this specific area.”

In a move apparently timed to preempt the CDC, the ASA recently joined the American Medical Association and 13 other medical societies in releasing new advice for managing postoperative pain in “complex patients,” such as those with chronic pain and those taking opioids prior to surgery. The societies said patients should be allowed to stay on opioids before, during and after surgery.

Other medical organizations urged the CDC to avoid the mistakes of the past, such as allowing insurers, states, regulators and law enforcement to adopt its voluntary recommendations as inflexible standards of practice.  

“It is imperative that the CDC assure the new guidelines emphasize not only support for safe, quality pain care, but also strive for clarity to prevent rigid application of the guidelines and prevent misunderstandings and misapplications that may result in substandard care and needless suffering by patients with unrelieved pain,” said Maureen Cooney, DNP, President of the American Society for Pain Management Nursing.

Other professional societies took offense that their particular specialties were omitted or only briefly covered in the revised guideline.

The American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine urged the CDC to include a “robust discussion” on the use of nerve blocks, epidural steroid injections and other interventional pain procedures.

The American Association of Neurological Surgeons said it was “disappointed” that the revised guideline “fails to adequately explore” implanted neuromodulation devices such as spinal cord stimulators.

And the American Psychological Association was offended by “the obvious, and unfortunate, omission of clinical hypnosis” from the guideline as an alternative pain therapy.