White Patients More Likely Than Blacks to Get Opioids at ER

By Drs. Trevor Thompson and Sofia Stathi, University of Greenwich

White people who visit hospital emergency departments with pain are 26% more likely than Black people to be given opioid pain medications such as morphine. This was a key finding from our recent study, published in the Journal of General Internal Medicine.

We also found that Black patients were 25% more likely than white patients to be given only non-opioid painkillers such as ibuprofen, which are typically available over the counter.

We examined more than 200,000 visit records of patients treated for pain, taken from a representative sample of U.S. emergency departments from 1999 to 2020. Although white patients were far more likely to be prescribed opioid medication for their pain, we found no significant differences across race in either the type or severity of patients’ pain.

Furthermore, racial disparities in pain medication remained even after we adjusted for any differences in insurance status, patient age, census region or other potentially important factors.

Our analysis of prescribing trends spanning over two decades’ worth of records found that opioid prescribing rates rose and fell, reflecting changing attitudes in clinical practice toward the use of opioid drugs. Notably, however, there appeared to be little change over time in the prescribing disparity across race.

These findings are important because they suggest that efforts to promote equitable health care in the U.S. over the past two decades, such as the Affordable Care Act, or “Obamacare,” do not appear to have translated to clinical practice – at least with regards to pain management in hospital emergency departments.

There’s no question that as the ongoing opioid crisis continues to escalate, a careful balance must be struck between the risks and benefits of prescribing opioids. But their appropriate use is an essential component of pain control in the emergency department, and they typically provide superior relief to non-opioids for short-term moderate to severe pain.

Undertreated pain produces unnecessary suffering and can result in a range of negative outcomes, even including a greater likelihood of developing long-term pain. There are over 40 million pain-related emergency department visits annually, so it is clear that equitable pain treatment is a fundamental component of a fair health care system.

We do not know why such marked racial disparities exist. Some researchers have argued that prescribing fewer opioids may be beneficial for Black patients as it reduces the risk of addiction. But this argument doesn’t square with the data, which show that overdose rates have traditionally been lower in Black populations compared with white people. However, this trend has started to change in recent years.

In addition, some evidence suggests that clinicians may hold unconscious biases, incorrectly believing Black patients to be less sensitive to pain or that certain racial groups are less willing to accept pain medication.

While there is preliminary evidence that these factors may be important, there is not enough research that examines the degree to which they influence clinical practice. Researchers like us also know very little about whether promising remedial strategies based on these factors – such as educational training during medical school that challenges stereotypical beliefs – are effective, or indeed even implemented, in the real world.

The need for tackling racial disparities in health was brought into focus once more in February 2023, when the Biden-Harris administration signed an executive order on further advancing racial equity. Given the long history of these issues, it is clear that more research is needed to help develop better strategies for tackling health inequalities.

The most effective strategies for addressing racial disparities in pain treatment are likely to be those that target the underlying causes. We are currently undertaking research to try to better understand these causes, how they contribute to disparities in real-world clinical practice and whether strategies designed to address them are actually effective.

Trevor Thompson, PhD, is an Associate Professor of Clinical Research and works in the Centre for Chronic Illness and Ageing at the University of Greenwich.  

Sofia Stathi, PhD, is a Professor of Social Psychology in the School of Human Sciences at the University of Greenwich, where she leads the Centre for Inequalities.

This article originally appeared in The Conversation and is republished with permission.

Moderation – Not Prohibition – Is Key to Treating ER Patients With Opioids

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Over the years many people living with pain have told us that they avoid going emergency rooms because they fear their pain will be ignored and that they’ll be treated as an addict if they ask for opioids.  

“Going to the ER terrifies me and I am an RN,” one patient said. “I was recently there on 2 separate episodes for kidney stones. Over a three-day period they gave me absolutely nothing for pain!” 

“I can't and won't return to an ER even if I am dying because I won't accept being treated like an addict ever again,” said a 60-year-old disabled woman.  

“It took me 12 hours and a staged public fit to get any pain relief at my local ER when I went in with a pinched nerve,” another patient told us. 

“Called suicide hotline and was told to go to ER,” said a woman suffering from a severe flare from rheumatoid arthritis. “Well, that was a waste. Told I was drug seeking and received a hefty bill to pile on top of all the others.”

A new study suggests that moderation – not prohibition -- is the key to treating pain in the ER with opioids. Researchers in Canada found that half of patients discharged from an emergency department needed only a handful of opioid tablets to control their pain.

“Patients are often prescribed too many opioid tablets and that means unused tablets are available for misuse,” Raoul Daoust, MD, a professor of Family and Emergency at University of Montreal, said in a press release. “On the other hand, since the opioid crisis, the tendency in the USA is to not prescribe opioids at all, leaving some patient in agonising pain.

“With this research I wanted to provide a tailored approach to prescribing opioids so that patients have enough to manage their pain but almost no unused tablets available for misuse.”

Daoust and his colleagues surveyed 2,240 adult patients who were treated for acute pain at one of six hospital emergency departments in Canada. All were discharged with an opioid prescription and were asked to complete a pain diary for two weeks.

Their findings, presented over the weekend at the European Emergency Medicine Congress in Spain, showed five or fewer morphine tablets (5mg) were adequate for about half the patients. The rest needed more tablets, depending on their condition. For example, patients suffering from renal colic or abdominal pain needed eight tablets, while a patient with broken bones needed 24 tablets. 

Daoust says emergency room physicians need to recognize that morphine can be “very beneficial” for patients. The key is to individualize treatment and prescribe the right amount to minimize the risk of addiction.

“Our findings make it possible to adapt the quantity of opioids we prescribe according to patient need. We could ask the pharmacist to also provide opioids in small portions, such as five tablets initially, because for half of patients that would be enough to last them for two weeks,” said Daoust.

The researchers plan to apply their findings in a clinical setting to evaluate whether they can reduce the long-term use and misuse of opioids. 

“This study shows how opioid prescriptions could be adapted to specific acute pain conditions, and how they could be dispensed in relatively small numbers at the pharmacy to lower the chance of misuse. This research could provide a safer way to prescribe opioids that could be applied in emergency departments anywhere in the world,” said Youri Yordanov, MD, an emergency physician at Saint-Antoine Hospital in Paris, who was not involved in the research.

A large 2017 study found that the risk of long-term opioid use is lower for ER patients than it is for patients treated in other medical settings. Researchers found that only 1.1% percent of ER patients taking opioids for the first time progressed to long term use. That compares to 2% of patients in non-emergency settings.

Emergency Room Visits Soar for Cancer Patients Needing Pain Relief

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

The number of cancer patients seeking treatment for pain in U.S. emergency departments has doubled in recent years, according to a large new study that further documents the harm caused to patients by misguided efforts to reduce opioid prescribing.

The study, conducted by a team of cancer researchers, looked at health data from 2012 to 2019 for millions of patients who had a cancer diagnosis and were not in remission.  Of the 35 million visits made to an emergency department (ED) by those patients, over half were deemed preventable – meaning the visits could have been avoided if the patient has received proper care earlier.

By a wide margin, pain was the most likely reason for a preventable ED visit. The number of cancer patients who went to an ED for poorly controlled pain rose from nearly 1.2 million in 2012 to 2.4 million in 2019. About a quarter of them had pain so severe they were admitted.  

“Consistent with previous studies, we found that pain was the most common presenting symptom (36.9%) in ED visits among patients with cancer and that the number of patients with cancer who visited an ED because of pain more than doubled over the study period,” lead author Amir Alishahi Tabriz, MD, a research scientist at the Moffitt Cancer Center in Florida, reported in JAMA Network Open.

“A possible explanation could be the unintended consequences of the efforts within the past decade to decrease overall opioid administration in response to the opioid epidemic.”

“I am not at all surprised by their result, as they are consistent with what I’m hearing from colleagues across the U.S.,” says Chad Kollas, MD, a palliative care physician and longtime critic of the 2016 CDC opioid guideline, which discouraged the prescribing of opioids for pain.

The CDC guideline was only intended for primary care physicians treating non-cancer pain, but it was quickly adopted throughout the U.S. healthcare system, including the field of oncology. Previous studies have documented how opioid prescriptions and doses declined for cancer patients, with the Cancer Action Network warning in 2019 that there has been “a significant increase in cancer patients and survivors being unable to access their opioid prescriptions.”

One of the most egregious cases involved April Doyle, a California woman with Stage 4 terminal breast cancer.  In 2019, Doyle posted a tearful video online after a pharmacist refused to fill her opioid prescription. She died about a year later, after the cancer metastasized into her lungs, spine and hip. 

“Unfortunately, the systematic misapplication of the 2016 Guideline created harms for patients due to reduced access to pain care and increased risk of suicide after nonconsensual or excessively rapid opioid tapers. These harms are predictable features of policy changes based on misguided calls for unfocused reductions in opioid prescribing,” Kollas told PNN.

Even if a cancer patient goes to an emergency room for pain relief, the odds of them — or any other patient — getting an opioid is dwindling. A new study by the National Center for Health Statistics found that the percentage of ED visits that ended with an opioid prescribed at discharge fell from 21.5% in 2010 to just 8.1% in 2020.

‘I Blame the CDC’

After years of complaints and bureaucratic delays, the CDC finally revised its opioid guideline in 2022 to more explicitly exclude patients undergoing cancer treatment, palliative care and end-of-life care. But many cancer patients felt it was too little, too late.

“My Mother had stage 4 terminal lung cancer. She was in horrible bone pain and her cancer doctor told her to take Tylenol for pain. We made several trips to the ER in the middle of the night just to manage her pain,” one woman told us. “She could not even enjoy her last moments on this earth with her family because of horrible cancer pain. As it spread all over, I could not help her. I am a nurse who watched her die miserably and I blame the CDC.”

“I live with stage 4 cancer and can't get any pain medication. I can't get any doctors to help me treat my pain,” another nurse told PNN. “My experience helps me understand why people become suicidal because they can't live with the pain anymore.”

“Stop making doctors afraid to treat pain adequately! I need a higher strength opioid for my chronic pain and my doctor will not up my strength because of that fear,” said another patient. “My husband has Stage 4 cancer and they refuse to up his strength as well. This is a crime against humanity!”

“Over the past decade, there has been a seismic shift in prescribing practices and sharp declines in access to these medications for patients with cancer.”

— Dr. Andrea Enzinger, Harvard Medical School

In another large study that looked at racial and ethnic disparities in the treatment of Medicare patients with advanced cancer, researchers saw a steady decline in opioid prescriptions and a rapid expansion in urine drug testing from 2007 to 2019. Their findings, published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, show that less than a third of late-stage cancer patients received an opioid for pain control in 2019 and only 9.4% received a long-acting opioid near the end of life.

Black and Hispanic cancer patients were less likely to receive opioids than their White counterparts. They were also more likely to get smaller doses than White patients.

"Over the past decade, there has been a seismic shift in prescribing practices and sharp declines in access to these medications for patients with cancer,” said lead author Andrea Enzinger, MD, a gastrointestinal oncologist and assistant professor at Harvard Medical School. “Our findings are startling because everyone should agree that cancer patients should have equal access to pain relief at the end of life."

Experimental Ketamine Pill Effective in Treating Acute Pain

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

An experimental oral tablet that combines ketamine with aspirin was nearly as effective as an opioid in treating acute pain in emergency room patients, according to the results of a small pilot study.

Ketamine is a non-opioid analgesic that is also used to treat anxiety and depression. The drug is so potent, that it is usually administered by an infusion, injection or nasal spray under strict medical supervision. Some doctors and patients have also found ketamine effective as a treatment for certain chronic pain conditions.

“Ketamine has long been viewed as a highly promising analgesic, but its adverse effect profile, available routes of administration, and short-lasting effects limited its use. Our goal is to overcome all three of these limitations,” says Joseph Habboushe, MD, an emergency room physician and founder of Vitalis Analgesics.

Vitalis has developed a proprietary formulation of aspirin that delivers faster and stronger pain relief than traditional aspirin. The company is working to see if a combination of its aspirin with low-dose ketamine could be used to treat pain.

In the pilot study at Maimonides Medical Center in New York, 25 emergency room patients with acute musculoskeletal pain were given the ketamine-aspirin pill – called VTS-85. After an hour, their pain level scores were reduced an average of 3.8 points, pain relief similar to that of oxycodone-acetaminophen (Percocet) formulations, which reduced pain levels by 4.0 points in previous studies.

Researchers say the pain relief from VTS-85 lasted for two hours, with pain scores dropping an average of 4.4 points. Notably, only 4-8% of patients experienced the dissociation and sedation that is usually experienced when ketamine is administered intravenously.

“The results of this pilot study are highly encouraging, with pain reduction similar to studies using IV ketamine formulations but lasting longer and with lower side effects, and it’s oral,” said Habboushe.

The study findings are published in The Journal of Emergency Medicine.

“If proven in larger controlled trials, this could represent a breakthrough in the treatment of acute pain and a range of other indications,” said lead investigator Sergey Motov, MD, Department of Emergency Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center.

Vitalis has completed a second larger trial on the use of VTS-85 in emergency room patients, but the results have not yet been released. The company is also studying VTS-85 as a treatment for acute headache and postoperative pain. The ketamine-aspirin pill will require a prescription if approved by the FDA.

Therapy Dogs Reduce Pain in ER Patients

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Pet therapy has long been used in a variety of medical settings to help patients feel better – from nursing homes and hospice care to pediatric wards and cancer centers. And now, for the first time, there’s evidence that therapy dogs can significantly reduce pain, anxiety and depression in emergency department patients.

A Canadian research team at the University of Saskatchewan randomly selected nearly 200 ED patients who were waiting to be treated or admitted at Saskatoon's Royal University Hospital. Half of the participants spent 10 minutes with a therapy dog and its handler, while the other half received standard care without a dog visit.

The study findings, recently published in PLOS ONE,  showed that nearly half the patients visited by a therapy dog reported a decrease in pain (43%), with similar improvements in anxiety (48%), depression (46%) and overall well-being (41%). The dog visits had no significant effect on heart rate or blood pressure.

“Clinically significant changes in pain as well as significant changes in anxiety, depression and well-being were observed in the therapy dog intervention compared to control. The findings of this novel study contribute important knowledge towards the potential value of ED therapy dogs to affect patients’ experience of pain, and related measures of anxiety, depression and well-being,” wrote lead author Colleen Dell, PhD, a sociology professor at the University of Saskatchewan.

Pain is the most common reason that someone visits an emergency department, so the finding that therapy dogs can decrease pain levels is notable – particularly because most patients in the study (77%) did not receive any pain medication.

Many people with pain dread the idea of going to an emergency room, fearing that their pain won’t be treated properly. In a PNN survey of nearly 1,300 acute and chronic pain patients, over 80% said hospital staff are not adequately trained in pain management and over half rated the quality of their pain care in hospitals as poor or very poor. Nearly eight out of ten patients felt they were labelled as an addict or drug seeker by hospital staff.

Dell and her colleagues are well aware of the stress a pain patient can experience when visiting an emergency department, particularly in an era when the use of opioid medication is discouraged. Long waits, bright lighting and high noise levels may also make it difficult for ED patients to relax. They think therapy dogs could be useful in improving the patient experience.

“With adequate access to pharmaceutical pain management a concern for ED patients, as well as long wait times, it will be important to explore creative, non-pharmaceutical options,” said Dell. “Patient waiting has also been associated with negative emotional states and well-being in ED patients. Negative feelings, particularly anxiety and stress, can be intensified when patients encounter uncertainty regarding their pain.

“The role of therapy dog visits in decreasing patients’ perceived pain, whether as a distraction or by some other mode, is an important finding that should be examined further in both practice and research.”      

The benefits of having a pet are well known to most pet owners. A 2019 survey of over 2,000 older Americans found that pets helped them enjoy life, made them feel loved, kept them physically active and reduced stress. Pet ownership was particularly helpful to those who rated their health as fair or poor. More than 70 percent of those older adults said pets help them cope with physical or emotional problems, and nearly half (46%) said their pets help distract them from pain.