Critics Challenge Study That Found Little Evidence to Support Use of Cannabis

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Medical marijuana advocates are challenging the findings of a new study that found little clinical evidence to support the use of cannabis in treating chronic pain.

“The findings appear out of step with the real-world experience of millions of patients who have come to rely on cannabis for pain management,” said Paul Armentano, Deputy Director of NORML.

The federally-funded systematic review – essentially a study of studies – was conducted by researchers at Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), who analyzed over 3,000 cannabis studies. They could find only 25 studies that met their criteria for review. Only placebo controlled clinical trials or observational studies lasting at least four weeks were included. The rest were deemed to be poor quality or flawed in some way.

“In general, the limited amount of evidence surprised all of us,” said lead author Marian McDonagh, PharmD, professor of medical informatics and clinical epidemiology in the OHSU School of Medicine. “With so much buzz around cannabis-related products, and the easy availability of recreational and medical marijuana in many states, consumers and patients might assume there would be more evidence about the benefits and side effects.”

‘Biased Findings’

Most of the 25 cannabis studies that met OHSU’s criteria for review were considered biased in some way — 30% of the clinical trials were considered to have “high risk of bias” and half had “medium risk of bias.”  Most of the observational studies were also considered biased.

Despite the limited evidence, the OHSU research team came to some sweeping conclusions. Their study, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, found no evidence to support the use of cannabidiol (CBD) or cannabis leaves, buds and flowers in treating pain. Only synthetic cannabis products rich in tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) were found to provide short-term relief from neuropathic pain.

Curiously, the OHSU researchers included in their review studies that evaluated the effectiveness of dronabinol and nabilone, two cannabis-based medications that are only FDA-approved to treat nausea, vomiting and weight loss. They are not formulated to treat chronic pain. Similarly, another study looked at the effectiveness of a cannabis extract in treating muscle stiffness (spasticity) caused by multiple sclerosis.

“It would appear that authors' relatively narrow focus and emphasis on both synthetic cannabis formulations (which historically have not demonstrated similar efficacy to whole-plant cannabis) as well as upon extracts that were initially designed to target medical ailments other than pain management may have biased these findings,” Armentano said in an email to PNN. 

“Numerous controlled trials involving whole-plant cannabis and reviews of said trials have determined that there exists substantial evidence that cannabis is safe and effective in pain management, particularly for neuropathy.” 

Armentano said nearly two-thirds of people enrolled in state-run medical cannabis programs registered for the treatment of chronic pain.

“Controlled studies have further indicated that cannabinoids can act synergistically with opioids, resulting in patients requiring lower doses to achieve relief. This is likely why we now have dozens of studies finding that pain patients taking opioids who initiate medical cannabis use frequently reduce or eliminate their opioid use over time,” Armentanohe said.

More Studies Needed

The OHSU researchers say more high-quality studies are needed on the safety and efficacy of cannabis products, which are largely unregulated by the FDA.

“Cannabis products vary quite a bit in terms of their chemical composition, and this could have important effects in terms of benefits and harm to patients,” co-author Roger Chou, MD, director of OHSU’s Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center said in a press release. “That makes it tough for patients and clinicians, since the evidence for one cannabis-based product may not be the same for another.”

Chou is a controversial figure in the pain community. A prolific researcher and frequent critic of opioid prescribing, Chou co-authored the CDC’s controversial 2016 opioid guideline. Although he has acknowledged conflicts of interest, Chou remains as one of the co-authors of a revised CDC guideline, which is expected to be released later this year.

The cannabis findings are similar to those in another OHSU review, which found no clinical evidence to support the use of kratom, an herbal supplement used by millions of Americans to relieve pain, anxiety, depression and other medical conditions.     

The studies on cannabis, kratom and other plant-based treatments are potentially worth up to $1.4 million for OHSU, a public research university that the federal government often turns to for medical research. According to the website GovTribe, in the last five years OHSU has been awarded nearly $2 billion in federal research grants, much of it coming from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).

Injectable Gel Shows Promise as Treatment for Back Pain

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

An experimental gel shows promise as a treatment for low back pain caused by degenerative disc disease (DDD), according to the results of a small study being presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Interventional Radiology in Boston.

Hydrogels have been used for years to treat DDD, but this is the first time that Hydrafil – an injectable gel developed by ReGelTec – has been tested on humans.

Hydrafil was injected into the discs of 20 people in Colombia with chronic DDD, who had average pain levels of 7.1 on a 10-point pain scale. None of the participants had found more than temporary, mild relief from treatments such as rest, analgesics, physical therapy and back braces.

“We really have no good treatments for degenerative disc disease, aside from conservative care,” said lead investigator Douglas Beall, MD, a medical advisor to ReGelTec and chief of radiology services at Clinical Radiology of Oklahoma.

“Surgery is statistically no more effective than conservative care and can potentially make things worse; nerve ablation is appropriate for only a few patients; and existing hydrogels are inserted through an incision as a soft solid, which can pop out of place if you’re not highly skilled in placing it.”

Because Hydrafil is injectable, it requires no incision and is minimally invasive, although patients are sedated for the procedure. Researchers heat the gel to become a thick liquid and then use a 17-gauge needle to inject it directly into the affected discs, using fluoroscopic imaging to guide them. The gel fills in cracks and tears in the disc, and then hardens, restoring the disc’s structural integrity. The procedure takes about 30 minutes.

This promotional video by ReGelTec demonstrates how Hydrafil works:

Six months after the injection, all 20 participants in the study reported significantly less low back pain, with their pain levels declining to an average of 2.0 on the 10-point pain scale. They also reported significantly better physical function.

“If these findings are confirmed in further research, this procedure may be a very promising treatment for chronic low back pain in those who’ve found insufficient relief from conservative care,” said Beall. “The gel is easy to administer, requires no open surgery, and is an easy procedure for the patient.”

In 2020, Hydrafil received the FDA’s breakthrough device designation, which allows for an expedited review of an experimental product when there is evidence it provides more effective treatment than current options.

ReGelTec is currently recruiting 50 people with DDD in Canada for a new clinical trial of Hydrafil.

Degenerative disc disease is one of the leading causes of chronic low back pain. Healthy discs cushion the spine’s vertebrae, facilitating movement and flexibility. But with activity and normal aging, discs can wear out and cause the bones of the spine to rub together and pinch nerves, causing pain and numbness. By age 60, most people have at least some disc degeneration in their spines.

Should Opioid Prescriptions Have an Expiration Date?

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Almost every food item you buy in a grocery store has an expiration date. Milk, bread and other perishable items have a “use by” or “sell by” date a few weeks into the future, while a can of beans may have a “best by” date that could be years away.

Should prescriptions for opioids and other controlled substances also have expiration dates? A date when they are no longer valid and can’t be filled?

That’s the premise behind a recent study in JAMA Network Open that looked at over 20 million opioid prescriptions written by U.S. dentists and surgeons in 2019. These were prescriptions primarily intended for short-term acute pain caused by operations or dental procedures.

Over 194,000 of the prescriptions (0.9%) were filled by a pharmacy 30 days or more after they were written – a sign they may have been used for something besides pain from a wisdom tooth extraction.

“Our findings suggest that some patients use opioids from surgeons and dentists for a reason or during a time frame other than intended by the prescriber,” said lead author Kao-Ping Chua, MD, a pediatrician at the University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.  “These are both forms of prescription opioid misuse, which in turn is a strong risk factor for opioid overdose.”

A misuse rate of about 1% for surgeons and dentists is low, but Chua and his colleagues found the delayed filling of prescriptions was even more common for scripts written by other medical specialists, such as internal medicine doctors (5.6%), family medicine practitioners (7.1%) and nurse practitioners (6.3%).  

Most states already limit the time window between writing and filling a prescription for a controlled Schedule II substance like hydrocodone – usually it’s 120 or 180 days. Eight states allow such prescriptions to be filled up to a year later. A few have no limits at all.  

“It’s perplexing that states would allow controlled substance prescriptions to be filled so long after they are written,” said Chua.

In 2019, Minnesota enacted one of the toughest dispensing laws in the nation, requiring all opioid prescriptions to be filled within 30 days. Delayed dispensing declined significantly in Minnesota soon afterward, before the law was repealed in 2020 out of concern it may have “unintended consequences” for chronic pain patients during the Covid-19 pandemic.  

Chua and his colleagues say more uniform laws should be adopted nationwide that limit the time frame for opioid dispensing only when prescriptions are written for acute pain. They also suggest that prescribers can reduce delayed dispensing themselves by including specific instructions for pharmacists not to dispense opioids after a certain time period.

Why Intractable Pain Treatment Requires a Stimulant

By Dr. Forest Tennant, PNN Columnist

In 1896, Dr. Henry Snow was the chief cancer surgeon at the Royal Brompton Hospital in London. He recognized and agonized over the immense pain and suffering of his patients when they developed constant pain and approached their end of life.

Dr. Snow wanted to relieve their suffering, so he administered the drugs that were available one at a time: morphine, cocaine and alcohol. With each he managed to get some pain relief, but didn’t obtain the relief he wanted and patients were still suffering. Not to be deterred, he made a profound discovery.

Dr. Snow mixed morphine and cocaine in liquid alcohol and administered the solution to his patients. Then he found formidable and humane pain relief. This three-drug mixture gave rise to the concept of “synergy of constituents,” which means that the simultaneous administration of multiple pain-relieving drugs added up to more than each one alone. In other words, two and two equaled six rather than four. 

The success of Dr. Snow’s discovery spread rapidly to other hospitals and countries, and became known as the “Brompton cocktail.” In France and elsewhere, physicians discovered they could add an antihistamine, antipsychotic or cannabis oil to the mixture and get even more pain relief.  

The Brompton cocktail was used until the 1970’s, when it gave way to the convenience of opioid tablets, capsules and injections, rather than the time and cost of making a liquid that contained multiple drugs. 

The Amphetamine Discovery 

Fortunately, after the demise of the Brompton cocktail, a handful of researchers weren’t about to forget the “synergy of constituents” and the pain-relieving potency of stimulants like cocaine. An example of the pain-relieving capability of stimulants is caffeine, which in the 1960’s was added to a variety of pain relievers such as aspirin and codeine to obtain synergy. 

Amphetamine was discovered in the 1930’s and promoted as “Benzedrine” to stay awake while driving. Because amphetamine produced alertness, it became known as a stimulant. Clinical reports began to surface in the 1940’s that amphetamine and its derivatives also helped depression, weight loss, mental alertness, hyperactivity and attention span. They soon began to be marketed and labeled for those conditions.  

Clinical studies on amphetamine derivatives for pain relief were finally started in the 1980’s, and they clearly showed that they provided a great deal of pain relief.  

By the time the last century folded, a core of pain researchers knew that not only cocaine but amphetamine derivatives such as methylphenidate and phentermine relieved pain. What they didn’t know was why. This answer was to come 15-20 years later. 

Stimulants Initially Rejected 

I became quite excited about the clinical trials that showed stimulants relieved pain, and in the late 1990’s gave a group of intractable pain patients the weak stimulant and weight loss drug phentermine, in combination with clonidine. The opioid dosages for these patients dropped 40 to 50 percent within six weeks and they got even better pain relief.

I presented my findings to colleagues at some national professional meetings. Much to my surprise, I was summarily informed that the new long-acting opioid formulations of the fentanyl patch (Duragesic), oxycodone (Oxycontin), morphine (MS Contin) and the implanted intrathecal (spine) opioid pump eliminated any need for stimulants or the concept of “synergy of constituents.”

By the turn of the century, the use of these new long-acting opioids and implanted opioid pumps became the standard of the day. Stimulants and their synergy were essentially forgotten, and they were rarely used for intractable pain again until about 2010. 

The Rebirth of Synergy 

After the year 2000, I don’t recall ever being referred an intractable pain patient who had not already been started on one of the long-acting opioids and/or an implanted opioid pump. They were referred to me simply because they were not getting adequate pain relief. Almost every one of these patients had found that their opioids quit working well, regardless of dosage or even if a second or third opioid was added to the mix.  

Somewhat out of desperation, about 12 years ago I recalled Dr. Snow, the Brompton cocktail and the “synergy of constituents.” I also remembered my study on phentermine and clonidine, so I started giving patients on opioids who were doing poorly my favorite stimulant, phentermine, or occasionally methylphenidate (Ritalin).  

Later the narcolepsy drug modafinil (Provigil) and a mixture of amphetamine salts (Adderall), came on the market. They too proved to be excellent “synergists” with opioids. I found that every intractable pain patient who received one of these stimulants not only got better pain relief and were either able to “hold the line” or reduce their opioid dosage.  

Phentermine continued to be my favorite stimulant to relieve pain and reduce the use of opioids because it additionally kept weight down and helped the patient keep moving and functional. 

Why Stimulants Work 

Although stimulants have been clinically known to relieve pain since Dr. Snow’s experiments in 1896, researchers didn’t provide us with the biologic “why” until recently. 

In the past decade, some outstanding researchers determined that there are about half a dozen different neurotransmitters in the brain and spinal cord that relieve pain. The three major neurotransmitters are endorphin, dopamine and gamma amino butyric acid (GABA). These neurotransmitters relieve pain by activating trigger points in the central nervous system called receptors. 

These astute researchers also determined that intractable pain may deplete endorphin, dopamine and GABA. Consequently, a substitute drug may have to be administered to obtain adequate pain relief.  

If you have constant, intractable pain, you may likely need the “synergy of constituents,” which will include an opioid, stimulant, and GABA substitute. Popular GABA substitutes include diazepam (Valium), carisoprodol (Soma), pregabalin (Lyrica), gabapentin (Neurontin), clonazepam (Klonopin), topiramate (Topomax) and alcohol. 

Which Patients Should Receive a Stimulant?

Stimulants have well-known abuse and addiction potential, so they should only be given to patients who have a well-documented disease or injury that is known to cause severe intractable pain. The most common diseases in this category are adhesive arachnoiditis, stroke or head trauma, reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD/CRPS), Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, and some autoimmune-collagen disorders.  

In most cases, patients who need a stimulant are clearly debilitated and require some family and caretaker support to function and carry out activities of daily living.  

Intractable pain patients have several dopamine substitutes available: 

• Amphetamine Salts (Adderall)

• Methylphenidate (Ritalin)

• Dextroamphetamine

• Phentermine

• Phendimetrazine

Misunderstood Objections

Many medical practitioners are not yet aware of the new research on stimulants and hesitate to prescribe them, even to needy, legitimate patients. The fear of abuse, diversion or dependence by the intractable pain or palliative care patient, while understandable, should not cause reluctance to prescribe a stimulant to these patients. No intractable pain patient will give away something that works so well.

In addition, the dosage of stimulants for pain relief is considerably lower than the usual level needed for abuse. Only small dosages are clinically needed in most cases and pharmacies today only issue limited quantities. Another safety factor in controlling adverse consequences of stimulants is that the severe intractable pain patient will usually have close family or caretaker support who can safely store and administer stimulants.

There is an unfounded fear of hypertension if a stimulant is prescribed. This is rarely the case, since the pain patient is dopamine deficient. A stimulant drug in an intractable pain patient may actually lower blood pressure since it may be elevated due to pain.

There is the belief that Adderall, Ritalin and some other stimulants are only for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). What is misunderstood is that ADHD is universal among intractable pain patients. Every person with intractable pain has reduced attention span, hypertension and agitation. One could argue that every intractable pain patient should be on a stimulant just for their ADHD. 

Dr. Snow and the Royal Brompton Hospital had the right idea. The severe, intractable pain patient needs an opioid to replace endorphin, a stimulant to replace dopamine, and a substitute for GABA.  

It’s time we bring back the “synergy of constituents” to humanely get better pain relief and simultaneously lower opioid dosages in the intractable pain patient. 

Forest Tennant, MD, DrPH, is retired from clinical practice but continues his studies on the treatment of intractable pain through the Arachnoiditis Research and Education Project. A bibliography on stimulants for intractable pain treatment can be found here  

The Tennant Foundation gives financial support to Pain News Network and sponsors PNN’s Patient Resources section.   

Patient in Tulsa Hospital Shooting Was Angry About Pain Care

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

The gunman who killed four people Wednesday at an Oklahoma hospital recently had back surgery and was angry about his post-operative pain not being treated, according to police and media reports.

Michael Louis shot and killed Dr. Preston Phillips, the surgeon who performed the operation, as well as another doctor, a medical receptionist and a bystander who took his wife to an appointment at Saint Francis Hospital in Tulsa. The 45-year-old Louis fatally shot himself as police closed in.

“What we currently know is that Louis was in pain, Louis expressed that he was in pain and was not getting relief and that was the circumstance surrounding this entire incident,” said Tulsa Police Chief Wendell Franklin. “He blamed Dr. Phillips for the ongoing pain that came from the surgery.”

Phillips was an orthopedic surgeon who specialized in spinal surgery and joint reconstruction. He graduated from Harvard Medical School in 1990.

No details have been released on what type of back surgery Louis had or what kind of pain medication he was given. According to a niece, he suffered from back pain for “a long time.”

“We are aware that he has been experiencing back pain for a long time but [there is] no reason for this senseless act,” the niece told The Daily Beast. “We are a Christian-based family. We have never experienced this before.”

Police say Phillips operated on Louis on May 19. Louis was released from the hospital on May 24, but called “several times over several days complaining of pain and wanted additional treatment,” according to Franklin. Louis had an appointment with Phillips on Tuesday, the day before the shooting, but it’s not clear if any further pain relief was offered to him.

In the days following his surgery, Louis was living in the home of his ex-wife, Dr. Edith Lubin, a family practice physician. Her lawyer released a statement saying Lubin had no knowledge of her former husband possessing a gun or having “any intent of harming anyone.”

“Dr. Lubin is praying for the families of all those affected. She acknowledges everyone’s concerns in understanding what happened, but she is at a loss for an explanation, other than the effect of continuing pain to Mr. Louis during his recovery,” the lawyer said in a statement to a KJRH-TV reporter.

Louis bought a handgun on Sunday and a semiautomatic rifle on Wednesday afternoon, just hours before the shooting. Both weapons were legally purchased, according to police.

Franklin said a letter found on Louis after the shooting “made it clear that he came in with the intent of killing Dr. Phillips and anyone who got in his way.”

Asked whether opioids were involved in Louis’ treatment, Franklin said investigators have only established that he was in pain and that other details about his care were still being investigated, according to The Washington Post.

‘Just a Matter of Time’

In recent years, many U.S. hospitals have stopped or reduced the use of opioids after surgery, fearing patients may become addicted. Non-opioid analgesics and over-the-counter pain relievers such as Tylenol are increasingly being used to treat post-operative pain.

"Out of all the hospital systems in Oklahoma, I have heard the most about the horrible pain treatment at St. Francis,” said Tamera Lynn Stewart, an Oklahoma patient advocate and Policy Director for the P3 Political Action Alliance. “I know so many who have had surgery there and received Tylenol only or who see doctors there that claim they aren’t allowed to prescribe." 

Opioid addiction is actually rare after surgery. Studies have found that less than 1% of patients are still taking opioids a year after major surgery or were later diagnosed with opioid dependence.  

With their pain poorly treated or left untreated, Stewart says some desperate patients in Oklahoma have threatened to kill themselves on the steps of the state capitol to make a statement. The mass shooting at the Tulsa hospital, while tragic, was not unexpected to her. 

“While our hearts are grieving with the families and victims, few in our grassroots communities built to advocate for appropriate treatment of pain without government or third-party interference can say this was completely unexpected. Veterans have committed suicide at VA’s across the country for the same reason,” Stewart told PNN. 

“Most of us knew it was just a matter of time before someone who could no longer bear the unrelenting pain did something more drastic in order to get the attention needed to end the restrictions (on opioids) and begin the much-needed process of swinging the pendulum back to a more neutral position.” 

Long before Tulsa, there were other cases where people in pain resorted to drastic action. In 2017, a man suffering from chronic back pain shot and wounded two people at a Las Vegas pain clinic before taking his own life.   

That same year, an Indiana doctor was fatally shot by a man who was upset because the physician refused to prescribe opioids to his wife, who suffered from chronic pain.

Seniors Often Slow to Recover From Long Covid

By Judith Graham, Kaiser Health News

Older adults who have survived covid-19 are more likely than younger patients to have persistent symptoms such as fatigue, breathlessness, muscle aches, heart palpitations, headaches, joint pain, and difficulty with memory and concentration — problems linked to long covid.

But it can be hard to distinguish lingering aftereffects of covid from conditions common in older adults such as lung disease, heart disease, and mild cognitive impairment. There are no diagnostic tests or recommended treatments for long covid, and the biological mechanisms that underlie its effects remain poorly understood.

“Identifying long covid in older adults with other medical conditions is tricky,” said Dr. Nathan Erdmann, an assistant professor of infectious diseases at the University of Alabama-Birmingham’s school of medicine. Failing to do so means older covid survivors might not receive appropriate care.

What should older adults do if they don’t feel well weeks after becoming ill with the virus? I asked a dozen experts for advice. Here’s what they suggested.

Seek Medical Attention

“If an older person or their caregiver is noticing that it’s been a month or two since covid and something isn’t right — they’ve lost a lot of weight or they’re extremely weak or forgetful — it’s worth going in for an evaluation,” said Dr. Liron Sinvani, director of the geriatric hospitalist service at Northwell Health, a large health system in New York.

But be forewarned: Many primary care physicians are at a loss as to how to identify and manage long covid. If you’re not getting much help from your doctor, consider getting a referral to a specialist who sees long covid patients or a long covid clinic. Also, be prepared to be patient: Waits for appointments are lengthy.

At least 66 hospitals or health systems have created interdisciplinary clinics, according to Becker’s Hospital Review, an industry publication. For people who don’t live near one of those, virtual consultations are often available. For specialist referrals, ask whether the physician has experience with long covid patients.

Also, more than 80 medical centers in more than 30 states are enrolling patients in a four-year, $1.15 billion study of long covid that is being funded by the National Institutes of Health and is known as RECOVER (Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery). Older adults who choose to participate will receive ongoing medical attention.

Seek Comprehensive Care

At the University of Southern California’s covid recovery clinic, physicians start by making sure that any underlying medical conditions that older patients have — for instance, heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease — are well controlled. Also, they check for new conditions that may have surfaced after a covid infection.

If preexisting and new conditions are properly managed and further tests come back negative, “there is probably an element of long covid,” said Dr. Caitlin McAuley, one of two physicians at the Keck School of Medicine clinic.

At that point, the focus becomes helping older adults regain the ability to manage daily tasks such as showering, dressing, moving around the house, and shopping. Typically, several months of physical therapy, occupational therapy, or cognitive rehabilitation are prescribed.

Dr. Erica Spatz, an associate professor of cardiology at the Yale School of Medicine, looks for evidence of organ damage, such as changes in the heart muscle, in older patients. If that’s detected, there are well-established treatments that can be tried. “The older a person is, the more likely we are to find organ injury,” Spatz said.

At the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab in Chicago, a rehabilitation hospital, experts have discovered that a significant number of patients with breathing problems have atrophy in the diaphragm, a muscle that’s essential to breathing, said Dr. Colin Franz, a physician-scientist. Once inflammation is under control, breathing exercises help patients build back the muscle, he said.

For older adults concerned about their cognition after covid, McAuley recommends a neuropsychological exam. “Plenty of older patients who’ve had covid feel like they now have dementia. But when they do the testing, all their higher-level cognitive functioning is intact, and it’s things like attention or cognitive fluency that are impaired,” she said. “It’s important to understand where deficits are so we can target therapy appropriately.”

Become Active Gradually

Older patients tend to lose strength and fitness after severe illness — a phenomenon known as “deconditioning” — and their blood volume and heart muscles will start shrinking in a few weeks if they lie in bed or get little activity, Spatz said. That can cause dizziness or a racing heart upon standing up.

In line with recent recommendations from the American College of Cardiology, Spatz advises patients who have developed these symptoms after covid to drink more fluids, consume more salt, and wear compression socks and abdominal binders.

“I often hear that going for a walk feels awful,” Spatz said. When returning to exercise, “start with five to 10 minutes on a recumbent bicycle or a rower, and add a couple of minutes every week,” she suggested. After a month, move to a semi-recumbent position on a standard bike. Then, after another month, try walking, a short distance at first and then longer distances over time.

This “go slow” advice also applies to older adults with cognitive concerns after covid. Franz said he often recommends restricting time spent on cognitively demanding tasks, along with exercises, for brain health and memory. At least early on, “people need less activity and more cognitive rest,” he noted.

Reset Expectations

Older adults typically have a harder time bouncing back from serious illness, including covid. But even seniors who had mild or moderate reactions to the virus can find themselves struggling weeks or months later. 

The most important message older patients need to hear is “give yourself time to recover,” said Dr. Greg Vanichkachorn, director of the Mayo Clinic’s Covid Activity Rehabilitation Program in Rochester, Minnesota. Generally, older adults appear to be taking longer to recover from long covid than younger or middle-aged adults, he noted.

Learning how to set priorities and not do too much too quickly is essential. “In this patient population, we’ve found that having patients grit their teeth and push themselves will actually make them worse” — a phenomenon known as “post-exertional malaise,” Vanichkachorn said.

Instead, people need to learn how to pace themselves.

“Any significant health event forces people to reexamine their expectations and their priorities, and long covid has really accelerated that,” said Jamie Wilcox, an associate professor of clinical occupational therapy at the Keck School of Medicine. “Everyone I see feels that it’s accelerated their aging process.”

Consider Vulnerabilities

Older adults who have had covid and who are poor, frail, physically or cognitively disabled, and socially isolated are of considerable concern. This group has been more likely to experience severe effects from covid, and those who survived may not readily access health care services.

“We all share concern about marginalized seniors with limited health care access and poorer overall health status,” said Erdmann, of UAB. “Sprinkle a dangerous new pathology that’s not well understood on top of that, and you have a recipe for greater disparities in care.”

“A lot of older [long covid] patients we deal with aren’t accustomed to asking for help, and they think, perhaps, it’s a little shameful to be needy,” said James Jackson, director of long-term outcomes at the Critical Illness, Brain Dysfunction, and Survivorship Center at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, Tennessee.

The implications are significant, not only for the patients but also for health care providers, friends, and family. “You really have to check in with people who are older and vulnerable and who have had covid and not just make assumptions that they’re fine just because they tell you they are,” Jackson said. “We need to be more proactive in engaging them and finding out, really, how they are.”

Kaiser Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues.

Virtual Reality Shows Long Term Benefits for Chronic Low Back Pain

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Critics of virtual reality therapy often say it’s a poor treatment for chronic pain because it only distracts patients from their pain and that the effects are temporary, at best.

But new research suggests that the benefits of virtual reality (VR) can last six months after treatment has stopped – at least for patients with chronic low back pain.

The study, published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, followed 188 people with chronic low back pain who had an average pain intensity score of 5 on a zero to 10 point scale.

Half the participants were given an EaseVRx headset to watch 3-D programs daily for 8 weeks, immersing themselves in a “virtual” environment where they can swim with dolphins, play games or enjoy beautiful scenery. The goal is help patients learn how to manage pain through cognitive behavioral therapy.  

The other patients also used the EaseVRx headset, but only watched routine nature scenes as a placebo or sham VR treatment.  

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH

Patients were followed for six months after treatment was stopped. Participants in both groups reported improvement in their pain and other symptoms six months after treatment, but the improvements were more significant in those who received VR therapy. Pain intensity was 31% lower for patients in the VR group, compared to 16% in the sham group. Physical function, mood, sleep and pain-related interference in activity were also better in those who received VR therapy. No adverse side effects were reported in either group.

“We have been pleasantly pleased and surprised that patients are maintaining clinically meaningful changes in pain intensity and interference 6 months after returning the device. It appears people are actually acquiring skills in a relatively short period that they continue to retain/apply months after treatment,” said Josh Sackman, co-founder and president of AppliedVR, which makes the EaseVRx headset.

AppliedVR is planning more research to see how patients respond long-term to VR treatment. A brain imaging study is being conducted to measure brain activity before, during and after treatment. Patients are also being recruited for a large clinical trial to see how VR therapy impacts pharmacy and medical claims.  

“In order to drive real acceptance, we are committed to extensive research to address any skepticism people may have,” Sackman told PNN.

The EaseVRx headset was given a Breakthrough Device Designation by the FDA in 2020 for fibromyalgia and low back pain. Last year the agency authorized the marketing of the headset for chronic low back pain in adults, the first medical device of its kind to receive that designation.

EaseVRx headsets are currently being used for pain management in over 200 hospitals and healthcare systems. A full commercial launch for home-based use is not expected until next year.

A Pained Life: Do I Stay or Do I Go?

By Carol Levy, PNN Columnist

I have become housebound 90% of the time. I don't want to go out if the pain has already started. And if it hasn't, I don’t want to go out and risk setting it off.

I have looked for groups to join, online and preferably in “real life.” Each one I find invariably involves an activity that triggers my trigeminal neuralgia and causes eye pain.

I love to read, but a book club requires reading a chosen book within a specific period. Then at the meetings, looking through it as certain passages, paragraphs and pages are referenced.

I thought of trying to find a hiking or walking group. I need exercise and I enjoy walking. But if it is breezy or, even worse, windy or very sunny, those are triggers for the face and eye pain.

I adore cooking. But cooking groups require cooking together and reading recipes, which requires a lot of eye movement and usage, which are my personal recipe for causing severe pain.

Before Covid I found a local choral group. I wanted to be a singer when I was young and moved to New York in my early 20's in search of a career as a singer. But six months after I got to NYC, the pain started and brought a halt to all my hopes and dreams of a singing career.  

The choral group offered a chance to sing and, more importantly, to be with others who love to sing. But it is a horror in terms of having to use my eyes to read the music and to follow the choral director's hand movements as she directs the timing.

The other night we had a concert. We only go to nursing homes, so the audience is happy to see us and accepts that we are kind of raggedy. I was excited that I would be performing with the group, but I was also very afraid. I would have to use my eyes continuously and the lighting may be too bright (another source of severe pain for me).

Like many of us, I don't like taking opioids. I have found through the years that none work for me, so my doctors and I agreed on codeine. I take it because it makes me feel as though I am doing something about the pain, something that gives me a false sense of control over it, a small amount of succor. But it’s no help for the pain.

So what do I do? Do I tell the director I can't do the concert? That would be very unfair to her and the other members (there are only 11 of us). Or do I try to smile, sing and not grimace through the ever-increasing pain?

Most people's lives are based on decisions. Do I take the car or the bus? Do I have the steak or the vegetable plate? Do I buy the house or rent an apartment? Do I tell the boss I quit? Many of the decisions we have to make are often life-changing or life-altering.

Outside of decisions regarding medical treatments that have potential risks, our choices are rarely life-altering. And yet, they can be just as devastating. Do I go and make the pain worse? Or do I stay home and regret not going? Is it easier to hide from life or easier to face the pain?

That is a conundrum that has no easy answer.

Carol Jay Levy has lived with trigeminal neuralgia, a chronic facial pain disorder, for over 30 years. She is the author of “A Pained Life, A Chronic Pain Journey.”  Carol is the moderator of the Facebook support group “Women in Pain Awareness.” Her blog “The Pained Life” can be found here.

In Memory of Two Pain Warriors

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

The pain community is mourning the loss of two of its most dedicated advocates this Memorial Day weekend: Terri Lewis and Jeffrey Fudin.

Dr. Fudin was a clinical pharmacist who specialized in pain management at the Stratton VA Medical Center in Albany, New York. He was also a prolific researcher, blogger and mentor to other clinicians. Fudin died Friday at the age of 63 after a lengthy battle with Stage 4 colon cancer.

Fudin spent much of the past year visiting with family and friends, displaying an extraordinary amount of courage, grace and humor as his prognosis worsened. He even managed to work a few laughs into his own obituary, which he penned himself.

“Seriously, you thought I was going to leave you all without a final post from the grave? If you’re reading this, I am now resting comfortably and hopefully watching over those I most cherished while on earth,” Fudin wrote.

“Someplace there is a lemon tree that will bear fruit from the earth. That sour fruit will provide joy and perhaps lemonade to those I leave behind.”

JEFFREY FUDIN

Terri Lewis’ battle with cancer was shorter and her passing unexpected. She died Saturday at the age of 70 from complications caused by chemotherapy for metastatic melanoma. 

Dr. Lewis was a rehabilitation specialist and educator who specialized in disabilities and mental health. She traveled regularly to Taiwan, where she was an Assistant Professor at National Changhua University of Education.

Lewis was a prolific researcher on issues affecting the pain community, which she shared freely with other advocates and reporters. She and Fudin helped me understand many complex issues when I first started covering pain management a decade ago.

“Terri was one of the most staggeringly intelligent people I have ever met. I remain in awe of her ability to identify and wrangle large data sets and to discern meaningful trends and relationships in healthcare processes with levels of complexity which overwhelm me,” said patient advocate Rose Bigham.

“She was generous with her time, coached and collaborated with many other pain patients and advocates, and was a fierce defender of her adult son who had been neglected and abused by multiple healthcare systems and providers due to his complex health conditions. She was relentless. She taught so many of us to never give up, and to be unafraid of tackling the big problems.”

TERRI LEWIS

“Terri Lewis was a force; her enthusiasm was inspiring, and I think that enthusiasm helped struggling patients keep hope alive and continue to fight, myself included. I am so grateful for all she taught me,” said Anne Fuqua. “There was one day where I was worried sick about a friend with muscular dystrophy who was on a ventilator. His physician had decided to take advantage of having him admitted for IV antibiotics and use this as an opportunity to taper his opioids and he planned to do this over the period of one week. Terri knew exactly who to ask for – and in less than 2 hours the taper was aborted.

“The very best those of us who loved Terri can do is to use what she taught us to help fellow patients as well as ourselves. I hope we can do a tenth the good she did in her lifetime.”

‘They Were Heroes’

It’s an overused expression, but Lewis and Fudin really were “pain warriors” who worked hard to dispel the many myths that surround the use of opioid medication. They risked their careers and reputations while opioid hysteria gripped the nation, patients were abandoned, and doctors were prosecuted for treating pain. When others looked away, Lewis and Fudin stood up to defend them.   

“They were heroes,” says Dr. Mark Ibsen, who fought to regain his medical license after he was suspended by the Montana medical board for “overprescribing” opioids.  

“Terri was a tireless and relentless advocate and teacher. She understood the malfeasance of targeting doctors by the abuse of dating mining,” Ibsen told PNN. “They use these data banks to predict diversion and prescribing ‘outside the usual course of medical practice’ even though nothing of the sort is proven.” 

Much of Fudin’s advocacy was focused on ending the “pseudoscience” of using morphine milligram equivalents (MME) to measure the risks and effectiveness of an opioid – which illogically presumes that every patient and every opioid are identical.

“Jeffrey Fudin debunked the false equivalency of MME levels, noting the bogus assertion that ‘one size fits all’ does not apply to the complexities of human biochemistry and pharmacology,” said Ibsen.  

Fudin’s funeral will be held on June 1 in Albany. In lieu of flowers, it was Fudin’s wish that any memorial tributes be made in the form of a tax deductible donation to the Dr. Jeffrey Fudin Memorial Foundation. 

A Terri Lewis Memorial has also been established at the Arachnoiditis & Chronic Meningitis Collaborative Research Network (ACMCRN), a non-profit that Lewis helped found and where she was VP of Research..

RIP Terri and Jeff.

Experimental Ketamine Pill Effective in Treating Acute Pain

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

An experimental oral tablet that combines ketamine with aspirin was nearly as effective as an opioid in treating acute pain in emergency room patients, according to the results of a small pilot study.

Ketamine is a non-opioid analgesic that is also used to treat anxiety and depression. The drug is so potent, that it is usually administered by an infusion, injection or nasal spray under strict medical supervision. Some doctors and patients have also found ketamine effective as a treatment for certain chronic pain conditions.

“Ketamine has long been viewed as a highly promising analgesic, but its adverse effect profile, available routes of administration, and short-lasting effects limited its use. Our goal is to overcome all three of these limitations,” says Joseph Habboushe, MD, an emergency room physician and founder of Vitalis Analgesics.

Vitalis has developed a proprietary formulation of aspirin that delivers faster and stronger pain relief than traditional aspirin. The company is working to see if a combination of its aspirin with low-dose ketamine could be used to treat pain.

In the pilot study at Maimonides Medical Center in New York, 25 emergency room patients with acute musculoskeletal pain were given the ketamine-aspirin pill – called VTS-85. After an hour, their pain level scores were reduced an average of 3.8 points, pain relief similar to that of oxycodone-acetaminophen (Percocet) formulations, which reduced pain levels by 4.0 points in previous studies.

Researchers say the pain relief from VTS-85 lasted for two hours, with pain scores dropping an average of 4.4 points. Notably, only 4-8% of patients experienced the dissociation and sedation that is usually experienced when ketamine is administered intravenously.

“The results of this pilot study are highly encouraging, with pain reduction similar to studies using IV ketamine formulations but lasting longer and with lower side effects, and it’s oral,” said Habboushe.

The study findings are published in The Journal of Emergency Medicine.

“If proven in larger controlled trials, this could represent a breakthrough in the treatment of acute pain and a range of other indications,” said lead investigator Sergey Motov, MD, Department of Emergency Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center.

Vitalis has completed a second larger trial on the use of VTS-85 in emergency room patients, but the results have not yet been released. The company is also studying VTS-85 as a treatment for acute headache and postoperative pain. The ketamine-aspirin pill will require a prescription if approved by the FDA.

100,000 ‘Unnecessary’ Hospital Procedures Performed in First Year of Pandemic

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

U.S. hospitals performed over 100,000 “low-value” procedures on Medicare patients in the first year of the Covid pandemic, including tens of thousands of spinal surgeries and knee arthroscopies, according to a recent study by the Lown Institute, a non-profit that seeks to reduce the use of unnecessary and ineffective medical treatments.

In 2020, no vaccines were available, the elderly were particularly vulnerable to the Covid-19 virus, and intensive care units were filled with infected patients. Yet many hospitals continued to perform questionable elective procedures at the same rate they did in 2019.

“You couldn’t go into your local coffee shop, but hospitals brought people in for all kinds of unnecessary procedures,” Vikas Saini, MD, president of the Lown Institute, said in a statement. “The fact that a pandemic barely slowed things down shows just how deeply entrenched overuse is in American healthcare.”

Lown researchers analyzed Medicare claims from U.S. hospitals for eight procedures that the non-profit considers to have “little to no clinical benefit” and are potentially harmful.  

Coronary stents were the most overused procedure, with over 45,000 balloon angioplasties performed to open up blocked arteries. The Lown Institute has long maintained that stents are unnecessary and risky in patients with stable heart disease.

Two spinal surgeries also made the list: 13,541 spinal fusions and 16,553 vertebroplasties were performed on older patients. In vertebroplasty, bone cement is injected into fractured vertebrae to stabilize the spine; while spinal fusions are used to join two or more vertebrae together to prevent them from moving and causing more pain. The Lown Institute considers fusions and vertebroplasties inappropriate for patients with low back pain and osteoporosis.

Nearly 1,600 knee arthroscopies were also performed in 2020, a type of “keyhole” surgery in which a small incision is made in the knee to diagnose and repair ligaments damaged by overuse or osteoarthritis. Recent independent studies have found arthroscopic surgeries provide only temporary relief from knee pain and do not improve function long term.

“There are certain things, certain practices that are just insane. You shouldn’t be doing this. Nobody should pay for this,” said Saini.

Highland Hospital in Rochester, New York was rated as the top hospital in the country for avoiding overuse procedures. Richardson Medical Center in Rayville, Louisiana was ranked as the worst hospital.

The American Hospital Association disputed Lown's ranking system, calling it misleading.

"Throughout the pandemic, but especially in the early months, many nonessential services and procedures were put off due to government restrictions or voluntary actions from hospitals to make room for massive surges of COVID-19 patients," Aaron Wesolowski, AHA's VP of policy research, said in a statement to Becker’s Hospital Review.

"Studies have shown that these delays or sometimes even cancelations in nonemergent care have had some negative outcomes on the health and well-being of patients, who continue to show up at the hospital sicker and with more advanced illnesses. Many of these services may alleviate patients' pain or provide other help to patients. Lown may define these services as 'low value,' but they can be of tremendous value to the patients who receive them."

To Each Life Their Own

By Mia Maysack, PNN Columnist

May is Mental Health Awareness Month, a good time to write about a topic that needs more attention, but one that makes many of us uncomfortable: suicide.

I know people who have tried to end their lives. There was one who almost succeeded. I was still in decent enough health at the time to be working in the nursing field and it just so happened to be my hospital they were brought to. I entered the room in time to watch their stomach being pumped with charcoal, which is the process used to rid the body of whatever has been ingested.  

After being revived, this person's first words to me were: "Why didn't you let me die?" 

My already broken heart shattered once again into a million pieces. Being much younger at the time, I couldn't begin to understand and took the experience personally. Now I’m old enough to know that someone’s choices about their own life have absolutely nothing to do with me. 

Fast forward a few years, and I found myself in a clinical support group at a time when my pain ran rampant and dictated every aspect of my existence. That’s what led me to the textbook-based, power-point class that was instructed by low-energy penny counters. I was that desperate for help. 

During one session, we broke out into smaller groups. On one side of me, there was someone who'd lived in unmanageable pain for 40 years. They were fed up with prior authorizations, insurance hoops and failed treatment options, and confided to the group that they were making plans to move where medically assisted suicide was legal. 

On my other side was someone who claimed they had never felt suicidal and couldn't begin to relate to the other person. In fact, it made them so uncomfortable that they excused themselves from the conversation and went to go tell on the other individual. 

It's human nature to avoid discomfort, but we don't always know how to create space for others who are suffering without also judging them. 

Between these two extremes, there was me -- literally and figuratively in the middle. After class, I watched as the instructors approached the individual in a hushed whisper and exchanged a slip of paper with a suicide hotline number on it.

I witnessed this person break down -- almost as if they were being scolded -- and couldn't help but think that if it was me standing on the edge and was essentially being told to go away and deal with it elsewhere, that might be the very last thing a person would do. And how that would be such a failure on our part. 

It was then that I began my own support group network, which eventually evolved into more of a self-help resource because I personally feel that while support is important, it can only take us so far. 

Despite living in agony, I spent many years clinging to my medical career. At one point I was working in hospice, where I was confronted daily by the truest definition of suffering -- seeing patients barely hanging on for the sake of their families, despite their desire to let go. 

It was then I contemplated who is being more selfish. Is it the person who no longer wants to remain alive because they are already dead inside or those demanding that they go on living? 

There's no right answer to that question. That isn't to belittle how anyone feels on either end of that spectrum, but more a rhetorical point to ponder.  

For many reasons, these last couple of years have been the most difficult of my life and I came the closest I've ever been to ending my own life. Lack of hope is one of the most dangerous places to be. The darkness is all consuming.  

I'm someone who is known for their positivity. It is noticed when I am not acting like myself or feeling a lower level of energy.  People depend upon me to be level headed and focused on the more uplifting aspects of life, but that can be a heavy weight to bear at times. 

It's a blessing to be in the position that I'm in and provide the type of counsel that I do. In fact, I now understand on a deeper level why my medical career meant so much to me. Showing up for others during their most trying times and hardest moments helped distract myself from my own inner turmoil. 

The same can be said about advocacy. Showing up for others whether or not I feel up to it, guiding them to their own voice and sharing their truth  is a way to make something out of my pain. Perhaps I've endured all that I have to gift others with what I've managed to learn. If being human was just about me and what I go through, there’s no way I’d be able to make it.

Mia Maysack lives with chronic migraine, cluster headache and fibromyalgia. Mia is the founder of Keepin’ Our Heads Up, a Facebook advocacy and support group, and Peace & Love, a wellness and life coaching practice for the chronically ill. 

‘My Pain Was No Big Deal’: Obese Patients Often Stigmatized by Doctors

By Lauren Sausser, Kaiser Health News

When Melissa Boughton complained to her OB-GYN about dull pelvic pain, the doctor responded by asking about her diet and exercise habits.

The question seemed irrelevant, considering the type of pain she was having, Boughton thought at the time. But it wasn’t unusual coming from this doctor. “Every time I was in there, she’d talk about diet and exercise,” said Boughton, who is 34 and lives in Durham, North Carolina.

On this occasion, three years ago, the OB-GYN told Boughton that losing weight would likely resolve the pelvic pain. The physician brought up diet and exercise at least twice more during the appointment. The doctor said she’d order an ultrasound to put Boughton’s mind at ease.

The ultrasound revealed the source of her pain: a 7-centimeter tumor filled with fluid on Boughton’s left ovary.

“I hate that doctor for the way she treated me — like my pain was no big deal,” Boughton said. “She seemed to make a decision about me based off of a very cursory look.”

Research has long shown that doctors are less likely to respect patients who are overweight or obese, even as nearly three-quarters of adults in the U.S. now fall into one of those categories. Obesity, which characterizes patients whose body mass index is 30 or higher, is pervasive in the South and Midwest, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The state with the highest rate is Mississippi, where 4 in 10 adults qualify as obese.

Obesity is a common, treatable condition linked to a long list of health risks, including Type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and some cancers. Despite obesity’s prevalence, it carries a unique stigma.

‘Almost Like Malpractice’

Doctors often approach the practice of medicine with an anti-fat bias and struggle to communicate with patients whose weight exceeds what’s considered the normal range. Some obesity experts blame a lack of focus on the subject in medical schools. Others blame a lack of empathy.

To counter that, the Association of American Medical Colleges plans to roll out in June new diversity, equity, and inclusion standards aimed at teaching doctors, among other things, about respectful treatment of people diagnosed as overweight or obese.

That’s not happening for many patients, said Dr. Scott Butsch, director of obesity medicine at the Cleveland Clinic’s Bariatric and Metabolic Institute. “This is almost like malpractice. You have these physicians or clinicians — whoever they are — relating everything to the patient’s obesity without investigation,” Butsch said. “The stereotypes and misperceptions around this disease just bleed into clinical practice.”

The problem, Butsch argued, is that too little attention is paid to obesity in medical school. When he trained and taught at Harvard Medical School for several years, Butsch said, students received no more than nine hours of obesity education spread over three days in four years.

In 2013, the American Medical Association voted to recognize obesity as a disease. But, Butsch said, doctors often approach it with a one-size-fits-all approach. “Eat less, move more” doesn’t work for everyone, he said.

Parents and medical providers need to take special care when talking to children who have been diagnosed with obesity about their weight, psychologists have warned. The way parents and providers talk to kids about their weight can have lifelong consequences and in some cases trigger unhealthy eating habits. For children who are obese, obesity experts agree, weight loss isn’t always the goal.

“There are many different forms of obesity, but we’re treating them like we’re giving the same chemotherapy to all kinds of cancer,” Butsch said.

Doctors Poorly Trained About Weight

All but four of the country’s 128 M.D.-granting medical schools reported covering content related to obesity and bariatric medicine in the 2020-21 academic year, according to curriculum data provided to KHN by the Association of American Medical Colleges, which does not represent osteopathic schools.

Even so, research suggests that many physicians haven’t been sufficiently trained to address weight issues with patients and that obesity education in medical schools across the world is “grossly neglected.” A survey completed by leaders at 40 U.S. medical schools found that only 10% felt their students were “very prepared” to manage patients with obesity.

Meanwhile, “half of the medical schools surveyed reported that expanding obesity education was a low priority or not a priority,” wrote the authors of a 2020 journal article that describes the survey’s results.

Butsch wants Congress to pass a resolution insisting that medical schools incorporate substantive training on nutrition, diet, and obesity. He acknowledged, though, that the medical school curriculum is already packed with subject matter deemed necessary to cover.

Dr. David Cole, president of the Medical University of South Carolina, said plenty of topics should be covered more comprehensively in medical school but aren’t. “There’s this massive tome — it’s about this big,” Cole said, raising his hand about a foot off the top of a conference table in Charleston. “The topic is: Things I never learned in medical school.”

The bigger issue, he said, is that medicine has historically been taught to emphasize memorization and has failed to emphasize culturally competent care. “That was valid 100 years ago, if you were supposed to be the fount of all knowledge,” Cole said. “That’s just not valid anymore.”

The Association of American Medical Colleges is trying to tackle the problem in two ways.

First, it developed a professional readiness exam for aspiring medical school students, called PREview, designed to assess an applicant’s cultural competence, social skills, and listening skills, as well as their ability to think through situations they may encounter in medical school and clinical settings.

“We call them softer skills, but they’re really the harder ones to learn,” said Lisa Howley, an educational psychologist and senior director of strategic initiatives at the association. More than a dozen medical schools now recommend or require that applicants submit their PREview test scores with their Medical College Admission Test scores.

Second, the medical college association will roll out new competency standards for existing medical students, residents, and doctors related to diversity, equity, and inclusion in June. Those standards will address racism, implicit bias, and gender equality and will aim to teach doctors how to talk with people who are overweight.

“The bias toward those individuals is way too high,” Howley said. “We have a lot more work to do in this space.”

After the source of Melissa Boughton’s pelvic pain was discovered, the OB-GYN who had recommended diet and exercise to ease her symptoms told Boughton the tumor was no big deal. “She acted like it was the most normal thing in the world,” Boughton said.

Boughton sought a second opinion from a doctor who marketed her practice as a “Healthy at Every Size” office. That doctor referred Boughton to a surgical oncologist, who removed the tumor, her left ovary, and part of a fallopian tube. The tumor was large, but it wasn’t cancerous. And although the surgery to remove it was considered successful, Boughton has since had trouble conceiving and is undergoing fertility treatment as she tries to have a baby.

“It’s an emotional roller coaster,” she said. “I feel very young at 34 to be going through this.”

Boughton — who describes herself as someone who doesn’t “fit into the BMI box” — said the experience taught her to choose her doctors differently.

“You can ask me if I diet and exercise like once,” she said. Any more than that, and she starts shopping for a different doctor.

Kaiser Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues.  

Medical Cannabis Improves Symptoms in Cancer Patients

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Medical cannabis improved pain and other symptoms in patients undergoing cancer treatment, while significantly reducing their use of opioids and other analgesics, according to a new study by Israeli researchers.

Over 300 cancer patients participated in the 6-month study, including many who were seriously ill. Breast, colon, lung and ovarian cancers were the most common diagnoses, with about half the patients receiving chemotherapy (55%) or diagnosed with advanced stage IV cancer (48%).

“Traditionally, cancer-related pain is mainly treated by opioid analgesics, but most oncologists perceive opioid treatment as hazardous, so alternative therapies are required,” said lead author David Meiri, PhD, an assistant professor at the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology in Haifa.

“Our study is the first to assess the possible benefits of medical cannabis for cancer-related pain in oncology patients; gathering information from the start of treatment, and with repeated follow-ups for an extended period of time, to get a thorough analysis of its effectiveness.”

Patients ingested cannabis that was rich in tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) through oil extracts, smoking or a combination of the two. For many, it was their first time using cannabis.

Most patients (60%) reported a positive effect from cannabis treatment, with significant improvement in their anxiety, depression, sleep, quality of life and pain catastrophizing. Most reported a small improvement in pain intensity and 20% said there was no improvement in their pain levels.

There was, however, a significant change in the use of analgesics. About 40 percent of patients who were taking pain medication of some kind (opioids, NSAIDs, anticonvulsants or antidepressants) stopped taking the drugs while using cannabis.

“We encountered numerous cancer patients who asked us whether medical cannabis treatment can benefit their health,” said co-author Gil Bar-Sela, MD, an associate professor at the Ha'Emek Medical Center Afula. “Our initial review of existing research revealed that actually not much was known regarding its effectiveness, particularly for the treatment of cancer-related pain, and of what was known, most findings were inconclusive.”

Notably, about one in every five participants died during the course of the study, which researchers attributed to their poor health and advanced cancer. Many of the patients also lost weight.

“Medical cannabis has been suggested as a possible remedy for appetite loss, however, most patients in this study still lost weight. As a substantial portion were diagnosed with progressive cancer, a weight decline is expected with disease progression,” said Meiri. “Interestingly, we found that sexual function improved for most men but worsened for most women.”

Overall, researchers say cannabis treatment provided “mild to modest” improvement in cancer patients, with only minor side effects. Their findings were published in the journal Frontiers in Pain Research.

The Real Story Behind the Overdose Epidemic

By Stefan Franzen, Guest Columnist

A recent commentary in The New York Times by German Lopez (“The Perils of Legalization’) flatly states that prescription opioids caused the overdose epidemic.

“The problem began with a legal, regulated drug: prescription painkillers,” Mr. Lopez writes, while building a case against legalization as a solution to our drug problems.

“Many of the people now using heroin or fentanyl began with painkillers. And drug cartels started to more aggressively ship heroin and fentanyl to the U.S. once they saw a promising customer base in the growing number of painkiller users.”

Mr. Lopez is confused. Heroin has been illegal in the U.S. since Congress passed the Harrison Act in 1914, yet that hasn’t stopped millions of Americans from trying heroin, just as Prohibition failed to stop people from drinking alcohol. The same is true for other illegal drugs, such cocaine, LSD and marijuana.

Prescription opioids are legal drugs when obtained by a doctor’s prescription. To suggest that we tried legalization and it failed is simply not true. Perhaps Mr. Lopez is confusing the liberalization of opioid prescribing that began in 1997 with legalization. In that case, yes, there was a movement in the medical community and by some drug makers to expand the use of opioids for pain.

Mr. Lopez does report correctly that many of the problems that arose during that period resulted from the failure of the Drug Enforcement Administration to carry out its responsibility to investigate when there was evidence of massive shipments of painkillers to rural counties by companies such as Purdue Pharma.

The role of the government in failing to protect consumers is the real story missed by the mainstream media, who are too busy informing the public about the latest lawsuit against pharmaceutical companies and opioid distributors. The consumers who were hurt the most were, and still are, persistent pain patients.

Of course, it is also tragic that many people were caught up in opioid prescribing and became addicted, due to a complete failure to investigate when Purdue began sending millions of OxyContin pills to rural counties in states like West Virginia and Tennessee. The mistake made here was not “legalization.” It was permitting greed and corruption to co-opt an effort by the medical community to reach people who had the greatest pain.

It is a false narrative that the overdose epidemic arose from the expansion of opioid prescribing and that drug cartels are only targeting pain patients.

Recent data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention show why that is a totally false assumption. The CDC estimates that nearly 108,000 people died from overdoses in 2021, a 15% increase from the year before. Drug deaths involving synthetic opioids – mostly illicit fentanyl – rose to 71,000, and there were 33,000 deaths linked to methamphetamine and other stimulants.  

Only 13,000 overdoses last year were linked to prescription opioids -- about 12% of all drug deaths -- but there is no data available to tell us how many of those overdoses involved patients who were actually prescribed the drugs. It’s safe to assume most of those who died took a prescription opioid intended for someone else that was bought or stolen. Or perhaps they took one of the millions of counterfeit pills flooding the country.     

Overdose deaths due to illicit fentanyl and other street drugs have been rising for years, yet nearly every media story continues to exaggerate the role of prescription opioids, leaving the public with the completely mistaken impression that doctors prescribing to pain patients caused the overdose epidemic. Commentators like Mr. Lopez, who have few facts to back up their statements, have no idea how much harm these statements cause to our most vulnerable citizens.

There was no “legalization” of prescription drugs, since they were already legal. And it was not a failed experiment to treat people in pain with greater decency -- just greed, corruption and incompetence that spoiled efforts to bring some quality of life to patients who suffer the worst types of pain, whether it is sickle cell disease, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, muscular dystrophy or adhesive arachnoiditis.

Others who suffer terrible pain are wounded veterans, car accident survivors and burn victims. I did not mention cancer, which obviously can be extremely painful, only because cancer is the one disease that commentators sometimes admit should be treated with opioid therapy. Lacking a pain meter to provide data, I will simply point out that any disease that causes substantial physiological changes, inflammation or tissue degeneration can be intensely painful. We should all respect that fact. We are all susceptible to pain.   

We must meet the anti-opioid zealots whenever they write or speak and call them out for their inaccurate and ill-informed commentary. Sadly, forums like National Public Radio and The New York Times did not respond to my attempts to call attention to the facts they got wrong. As a scientist, I believe in evidence.

Stefan Franzen, PhD, is a Professor of Chemistry at North Carolina State University.

Franzen is the author of “Patient Z” – a book that looks at pain, addiction and the opioid crisis through the eyes of a patient who can’t find good pain care because opioid medication has been criminalized and many doctors are now too afraid to prescribe it.