Heavy Metals and Plastic Residue Found in Many CBD Products

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Yet another study has found evidence that cannabidiol (CBD) products are frequently mislabeled, with over half of the edibles and topicals tested containing significantly more or less CBD than their labels indicated. Researchers at the University of Miami School of Medicine also found that many CBD products are contaminated with low-levels of heavy metals and plastic chemicals.

“Because the cannabis plant is recognized as a bioaccumulator, which is highly effective at absorbing and retaining contaminants (e.g., heavy metals) in soil, it is important to characterize the degree of contamination in CBD products and their label accuracy to better estimate potential health benefits and risks associated with consumption,” researchers explained in the journal The Science of the Total Environment. 

Investigators analyzed 516 CBD products that were purchased online or at retail stores and had them tested at Ellipse Analytics in Denver. About a quarter of the CBD products were edibles.

Less than half of all the products tested had CBD concentrations within 10% of their label claims. Forty percent of the products contained significantly less CBD than claimed by the manufacturer, while 18% contained significantly more CBD.

Of the edible products analyzed, 42% tested positive for the presence of lead, 37% tested positive for mercury, 28% tested positive for arsenic, and 8% tested positive for cadmium. Most contained only trace amounts of heavy metals, but four edibles had lead levels that exceeded California’s recommended limit for daily lead consumption.

THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT

Many of the edibles also contained low levels of plastic chemicals – known as phthalates – that are designed to make plastics more flexible. Phthalates leach off plastic and have become pervasive in the air, soil and water. Some phthalates have affected the reproductive systems of animals, although their impact on human health is not clear.

The percentage of CBD edibles with detectable phthalate concentrations ranged from 13% to 80% across four phthalates, with DEHP being the most prevalent. DEHP has been linked to cancer, birth defects and other reproductive harm. Federal law prohibits the manufacture and sale of children’s toys and child care products containing DEHP at levels greater than 0.1%. 

“Low-level contamination of edible CBD products with heavy metals and phthalates is pervasive. There is substantial discrepancy between the product label claims for CBD potency and the amount measured in both edible and topical products, underscoring the need for tight regulations for CBD product label integrity to protect consumers,” researchers concluded.

“Given that the consumer demographic purchasing CBD products includes those afflicted with pain, insomnia, anxiety, and other health conditions, these findings could give consumers and medical practitioners hesitation about the benefits and potential harm of CBD use.”

The study was funded by Jazz Pharmaceuticals and the Clean Label Project, a non-profit that seeks to improve food and consumer product labeling.

Previous studies have also found that many CBD products are mislabeled. A recent study at the University of Kentucky College of Medicine found that only half of the CBD oil products had concentrations of cannabidiols that were within 10% of their label claims. Researchers also found that most CBD oils contained trace amounts of THC (tetrahydrocannabinol), the psychoactive substance in cannabis, including some oils that were labeled "THC Free."

Time to Reject the Label ‘Failed Back Surgery Syndrome’

Dr. Forest Tennant, PNN Columnist

In our research studies on Adhesive Arachnoiditis (AA), a high percentage of patients tell us that their doctors have said the cause of their pain is “Failed Back Surgery Syndrome” (FBSS).

This misnomer and poor excuse for a diagnosis has fortunately been rejected “out-of-hand” as a cause of pain by most upscale physicians. After all, FBSS is neither a disease nor a symptom. We can do better in 2022.

Some three or four decades ago, FBSS became a popular moniker used by most physicians, including this author. Why? Patients who had back pain underwent surgery, which was technically and expertly done, but the pain didn’t go away. This situation was a mystery in times past, but the label FBSS should never be used or applied in this day and age.

Today, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has advanced so much since its invention in the late 1980’s that painful disorders and diseases of the spine can almost always be diagnosed. There is now a technique called “contrast MRI” that allows a clear distinction to be made between spinal fluid and solid tissues, including the spinal cord, discs, nerve roots and covering of the spinal canal.

In our recent research studies, we have reviewed contrast MRIs in well over 200 persons who have been labeled as having FBSS. Every person had one or more obvious reasons to have chronic pain, despite well-done, competent surgery. For example, our reviews have found discs that have protruded, adhesive arachnoiditis, epidural fibrosis, spondylolisthesis, Tarlov Cysts, arthritic vertebra or other good, solid reasons to have pain, regardless of surgery.

Let’s be clear. Spine surgery may be necessary for a number of reasons, the most common being significant herniation of a disc or collapse of vertebrae that may dangerously compress the spinal canal. It also may be fair to say that a lot of surgery can now be avoided, since eminent danger and need for surgery is pretty clear cut on modern, contrast MRI’s.    

In addition to contrast MRIs, we now have good diagnostic tests for inflammation, autoimmunity and genetic connective tissue disorders, which are emerging as legitimate causes of severe, chronic back pain that hasn’t responded to chiropractic, physical therapy, anti-inflammatory agents and corticosteroid injections.

Put simply, the diagnostic evaluation of severe chronic back pain needs a contrast MRI and specific diagnostic tests rather than a non-descript, “wastebasket” diagnosis like FBSS.

Perhaps the worst thing about the label FBSS, is that it is easy to apply and avoids the time, money and knowledge to make a specific diagnosis. These excuses to avoid a specific diagnosis must now be rejected because we have the diagnostic and treatment measures to better the lives and health of those who suffer from severe chronic back pain.

Forest Tennant, MD, DrPH, is retired from clinical practice but continues his research on the treatment of intractable pain and arachnoiditis through the Tennant Foundation’s Arachnoiditis Research and Education Project and the Intractable Pain Syndrome Research and Education Project.

The Tennant Foundation gives financial support to Pain News Network and sponsors PNN’s Patient Resources section.   

DEA Warns of ‘Rainbow Fentanyl’ Targeting Kids

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

At first glance, they look like candy. Brightly-colored tablets in shades of pink, purple, yellow and green. Not unlike a bag of Skittles or a bowl of Fruit Loops.

But they’re not sweet treats. They’re the latest version of “Mexican Oxy” – counterfeit oxycodone pills laced with fentanyl, stamped with an “M” on one side and “30” on the other. Typically blue in color – like authentic oxycodone – the pills increasingly come in a variety of colors, what law enforcement agencies call “rainbow fentanyl.”

In recent weeks, rainbow fentanyl has been found in 18 states, including an August 17 bust at the Arizona border with Mexico, where over 15,000 of the colorful pills were found strapped to a smuggler’s leg.

It was the second consecutive day rainbow fentanyl was intercepted at the port of Nogales, a possible sign that drug cartels are targeting younger users.

“Rainbow fentanyl — fentanyl pills and powder that come in a variety of bright colors, shapes, and sizes — is a deliberate effort by drug traffickers to drive addiction amongst kids and young adults,” DEA Administrator Anne Milgram said in a statement that warns of the “alarming emerging trend.”

HOMELAND SECURITY IMAGE

The DEA says rainbow fentanyl is being seized in multiple forms, including blocks that resemble the chalk a child might use to color a sidewalk. A recent drug raid in Portland, Oregon turned up several powdered blocks of rainbow fentanyl, along with meth, heroin, hundreds of fentanyl pills and a small armory of guns.

“Deputies are particularly concerned about rainbow fentanyl getting into the hands of young adults or children, who mistake the drug for something else, such as candy or a toy, or those who may be willing to try the drug due to its playful coloring. The powdered fentanyl found during this investigation resembles the color and consistency of sidewalk chalk,” the Multnomah County Sheriff’s Office said in a statement.

“We are seeing more powdered fentanyl that is dyed in various colors. The strength can vary but is typically stronger than pressed pills,” said Kelsi Junge, Harm Reduction Supervisor for Multnomah County.

Some colors are believed to be more potent than others, a claim that has not been confirmed by DEA laboratory tests.  

No matter the color or shape, rainbow fentanyl is dangerous. Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid that is 50 times more potent than heroin and 100 times more potent than morphine. Just two milligrams of fentanyl, similar in size to 10-15 grains of salt, is considered a lethal dose. 

Because illicit fentanyl is cooked up in makeshift laboratories by amateur chemists, the potency of the pills or powder varies considerably.

MULTNOMAH COUNTY SHERIFF

The DEA says most of the illicit fentanyl in the United States is supplied by two Mexican drug cartels, the Sinaloa and Jalisco New Generation cartels, although there is no shortage of Americans willing to transport the drugs or turn them into tablets with pill presses.

“The men and women of the DEA are relentlessly working to stop the trafficking of rainbow fentanyl and defeat the Mexican drug cartels that are responsible for the vast majority of the fentanyl that is being trafficked in the United States,” said Milgram.

Fentanyl is a potent analgesic that is prescribed legally for severe pain, but it is illicit fentanyl and its analogues that are responsible for the vast majority of drug deaths. According to the CDC, over 107,000 Americans died of drug overdoses in 2021, with two-thirds of the deaths linked to fentanyl.

FDA Conducting Review of Opioid Regulations

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has launched an extensive review of its opioid regulations, with the goal of reducing overdoses and making revisions “to support appropriate use of opioid analgesics.”

In a blog post, FDA commissioner Robert Califf, MD, acknowledged the overdose crisis has “evolved beyond prescription opioids” and is now largely driven by illicit fentanyl and other street drugs. But he was vague about whether FDA would loosen restrictions on opioid pain medication or tighten them further.

“While the FDA’s previous strategies have largely focused on opioid use and overdoses, the evolving nature of the overdose crisis calls for both a new approach and honest reflection about what the FDA can do differently moving forward,” Califf said. “For example, during my confirmation process, I committed to undertaking a review of our opioid decisions, including labeling. We have initiated this review with the intended goal of understanding what revisions are needed to support appropriate use of opioid analgesics. Our ‘lessons learned’ will actively inform our future approach.”

One of the lessons learned by the CDC over the past few years is that rigid opioid prescribing guidelines have been harmful to patients and need to be “individualized and flexible.” The agency is currently in the process of revising its 2016 opioid guideline, with the goal of releasing an updated guideline late this year.

It’s not clear if the FDA is moving in a similar direction. One of the priorities for the agency’s new Overdose Prevention Framework is to “improve pain management and patient outcomes” – not by making opioids more accessible, but by reducing “unnecessary initial prescription drug exposure and inappropriate prolonged prescribing.” 

Califf said the agency was studying the need for mandatory prescriber education about opioids, including a national continuing education program about the use of opioids to manage pain. Most medical schools in the U.S. and Canada do not require a course in pain education and few even offer pain management as an elective.

The FDA may also tighten the rules for getting new opioids approved, including a requirement that drug makers demonstrate that their products offer material safety advantages over existing opioid analgesics. At the same time, the agency is planning to release new guidance to speed up the development of non-opioid and non-addictive treatments for chronic pain.

This is the 70-year old Califf’s second stint as FDA commissioner, having previously served in that role during the Obama administration. He was confirmed for a second time by the U.S. Senate last December by a narrow 50 to 46 vote. At the time, he promised an extensive review of the FDA’s opioid regulations to counteract complaints that the agency did little to prevent opioid misuse and was too accommodating to drug makers.

Federal efforts to reduce drug overdoses by limiting opioid prescriptions have largely failed. While opioid prescribing has fallen by 48% over the past five years, overdoses soared to a record 107,000 drug deaths in 2021, driven primarily by illicit fentanyl.

A recent study found no “direct correlation” between opioid prescribing and overdoses. Another analysis of overdose deaths in 2020 found that prescription opioids ranked well behind illicit fentanyl, alcohol, cocaine, methamphetamine and heroin as the leading cause of drug deaths.   

The ‘Parallel Pandemic’ of Long Covid

By Liz Szabo, Kaiser Health News

The latest covid-19 surge, caused by a shifting mix of quickly evolving omicron subvariants, appears to be waning, with cases and hospitalizations beginning to fall. Like past covid waves, this one will leave a lingering imprint in the form of long covid, an ill-defined catchall term for a set of symptoms that can include debilitating fatigue, difficulty breathing, chest pain, and brain fog.

Although omicron infections are proving milder overall than those caused by last summer’s delta variant, omicron has also proved capable of triggering long-term symptoms and organ damage. But whether omicron causes long covid symptoms as often — and as severe — as previous variants is a matter of heated study.

Michael Osterholm, director of the University of Minnesota’s Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy, is among the researchers who say the far greater number of omicron infections compared with earlier variants signals the need to prepare for a significant boost in people with long covid.

The U.S. has recorded nearly 38 million covid infections so far this year, as omicron has blanketed the nation. That’s about 40% of all infections reported since the start of the pandemic, according to the Johns Hopkins University Coronavirus Research Center.

Long covid “is a parallel pandemic that most people aren’t even thinking about,” said Akiko Iwasaki, a professor of immunobiology at Yale University. “I suspect there will be millions of people who acquire long covid after omicron infection.”

Scientists have just begun to compare variants head-to-head, with varying results. While one recent study in The Lancet suggests that omicron is less likely to cause long covid, another found the same rate of neurological problems after omicron and delta infections.

Estimates of the proportion of patients affected by long covid also vary, from 4% to 5% in triple-vaccinated adults to as many as 50% among the unvaccinated, based on differences in the populations studied.

One reason for that broad range is that long covid has been defined in widely varying ways in different studies, ranging from self-reported fogginess for a few months after infection to a dangerously impaired inability to regulate pulse and blood pressure that may last years. Even at the low end of those estimates, the sheer number of omicron infections this year would swell long-covid caseloads.

“That’s exactly what we did find in the UK,” said Claire Steves, a professor of aging and health at King’s College in London and author of the Lancet study, which found patients have been 24% to 50% less likely to develop long covid during the omicron wave than during the delta wave.

“Even though the risk of long covid is lower, because so many people have caught omicron, the absolute numbers with long covid went up,” Steves said.

Reinfections Raise Risk

A recent study analyzing a patient database from the Veterans Health Administration found that reinfections dramatically increased the risk of serious health issues, even in people with mild symptoms. The study of more than 5.4 million VA patients, including more than 560,000 women, found that people reinfected with covid were twice as likely to die or have a heart attack as people infected only once. And they were far more likely to experience health problems of all kinds as of six months later, including trouble with their lungs, kidneys, and digestive system.

“We’re not saying a second infection is going to feel worse; we’re saying it adds to your risk,” said Dr. Ziyad Al-Aly, chief of research and education service at the Veterans Affairs St. Louis Health Care System.

Researchers say the study, published online but not yet peer-reviewed, should be interpreted with caution. Some noted that VA patients have unique characteristics, and tend to be older men with high rates of chronic conditions that increase the risks for long covid. They warned that the study’s findings cannot be extrapolated to the general population, which is younger and healthier overall.

“We need to validate these findings with other studies,” said Dr. Harlan Krumholz, director of the Yale New Haven Hospital Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation. Still, he added, the VA study has some “disturbing implications.”

With an estimated 82% of Americans having been infected at least once with the coronavirus as of mid-July, most new cases now are reinfections, said Justin Lessler, a professor of epidemiology at the University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health.

‘Breathing Through a Straw’

Of course, people’s risk of reinfection depends not just on their immune system, but also on the precautions they’re taking, such as masking, getting booster shots, and avoiding crowds.

New Jersey salon owner Tee Hundley, 43, has had covid three times, twice before vaccines were widely available and again this summer, after she was fully vaccinated. She is still suffering the consequences.

After her second infection, she returned to work as a cosmetologist at her Jersey City salon but struggled with illness and shortness of breath for the next eight months, often feeling like she was “breathing through a straw.”

She was exhausted, and sometimes slow to find her words. While waxing a client’s eyebrows, “I would literally forget which eyebrow I was waxing,” Hundley said. “My brain was so slow.”

When she got a breakthrough infection in July, her symptoms were short-lived and milder: cough, runny nose, and fatigue. But the tightness in her chest remains.

“I feel like that’s something that will always be left over,” said Hundley, who warns friends with covid not to overexert. “You may not feel terrible, but inside of your body there is a war going on.”

Although each omicron subvariant has different mutations, they’re similar enough that people infected with one, such as BA.2, have relatively good protection against newer versions of omicron, such as BA.5. People sickened by earlier variants are far more vulnerable to BA.5.

Several studies have found that vaccination reduces the risk of long covid. But the measure of that protection varies by study, from as little as a 15% reduction in risk to a more than 50% decrease. A study published in July found the risk of long covid dropped with each dose people received.

For now, the only surefire way to prevent long covid is to avoid getting sick. That’s no easy task as the virus mutates and Americans have largely stopped masking in public places. Current vaccines are great at preventing severe illness but do not prevent the virus from jumping from one person to the next.

Scientists are working on next-generation vaccines — “variant-proof” shots that would work on any version of the virus, as well as nasal sprays that might actually prevent spread. If they succeed, that could dramatically curb new cases of long covid.

“We need vaccines that reduce transmission,” Al-Aly said. “We need them yesterday.”

Kaiser Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues.

Raising Lazarus: Another Take on the Opioid Crisis

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Beth Macy’s bestselling book “Dopesick” – and the Hulu series based on it -- helped shape the popular narrative on the origins of the opioid crisis: that Purdue Pharma and the Sackler family duped physicians into prescribing highly addictive OxyContin to millions of pain patients, setting off a public health and overdose crisis that continues to this day.

Macy’s new book “Raising Lazarus” focuses on many of the same themes, but with an important new addition. She recognizes that opioid hysteria and fear of addiction went too far, depriving many people in pain of the medications they need to lead functional and productive lives.

“In recent years, law enforcement agencies, the CDC, and other medical authorities had overreacted to the first wave of the opioid crisis by clamping down too hard on opioid-prescribing,” Macy wrote. “Some doctors responded to the revised 2016 CDC opioid-prescribing guideline – and their fear of DEA prosecution – by declaring draconian caps and essentially abandoning their patients.

“People who needed opioids were refused access. Others with decades-long chronic conditions like extreme rheumatoid arthritis were abandoned by doctors and were now left bedbound. Some who were denied the opioids they’d been taking for decades attempted suicide or resorted to illegal drugs.”  

Those are welcome words from a noted critic of opioid “overprescribing.” But that passage – which is buried halfway through a 373-page book – doesn’t represent what Raising Lazarus is all about. Macy’s new book primarily deals with Purdue’s corporate greed and the ongoing struggles of working-class people in Appalachia to overcome addiction and a healthcare system that simply doesn’t work for them.

Macy is a bit defensive and resorts to gaslighting when she acknowledges past criticism from pain patients for Dopesick “drawing too much attention to overprescribed opioid pills.” Many of their complaints are valid, she admits, “if sometimes over-the-top and oblivious to the root causes of the crisis.”

Interestingly, Macy never actually quotes one of those “over-the-top” pain patients in Raising Lazarus, but she did interview Stanford pain psychologist Dr. Beth Darnall about the reluctance of doctors to prescribe opioids.

“Doctors are so concerned about being flagged, concerned about their license and their livelihood, they don’t want to take (chronic pain patients) on, and so you end up with patient abandonment, and iatrogenic harms that can create a medically dangerous situation,” Darnall told Macy.    

‘The Cruel World of Purdue Pharma’

Greed, no doubt, is one of the primary causes of the opioid crisis and Macy describes in detail how the Sacklers manipulated the political and legal system, paying their chief counsel the handsome rate of $1,790 an hour to gum things up as best he could to preserve the family fortune and prevent them from going to prison.

But she gives a free pass to others who have profited from the opioid crisis, often at the expense of pain patients, most notably the private plaintiff law firms suing drug makers on behalf of cities, counties and states.

Macy credits the late attorney Paul Hanly as being “the first to crack open the cruel world of Purdue Pharma” without pointing out that his law firm, Simmons Hanly Conroy, boasts that it “effectively invented large-scale, multi-defendant opioid litigation” and stands to make billions of dollars in contingency fees from settlement money.  

Also unmentioned is the $400,000 in campaign donations given by Simmons Hanly Conroy to former Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) in 2018, who conveniently produced a well-publicized report that year critical of drug makers and medical pain societies that the law firm was suing. Overwhelmed with legal fees defending themselves, two of those pain societies filed for bankruptcy, a loss that pain management specialists, researchers and patients could ill afford.

Macy does quote anti-opioid activists like Dr. Andrew Kolodny and Dr. Anna Lembke, but doesn’t mention that they testified as paid expert witnesses for Hanly and other plaintiff law firms, making well into six figures for their testimony, which they often failed to disclose in conflict of interest statements.  

“The opioid-litigation money is a once-in-a-generation opportunity,” Macy writes, with unintended irony.

Macy is hopeful the settlement money – once estimated at $50 billion -- will go towards addiction treatment and better healthcare for communities ravaged by the opioid crisis. Unfortunately, much of it has already been spent on legal fees, media and public relations campaigns, and political donations. That’s not counting shady industries that have grown and prospered due to the opioid crisis; from drug testing and stem cell providers to cannabis promoters and drug cartels.  

Even though fentanyl and other street drugs are responsible for the vast majority of overdoses, Macy still clings to the tired notion that opioid pain medication started it all.

“A quarter century into the crisis, many people with OUD (opioid use disorder) have long since transitioned from painkillers to heroin, methamphetamine, and fentanyl, the ultra-potent synthetic opioid. And we now have a generation of drug users that started with heroin and fentanyl,” she writes. “Death by drugs is now a national problem, but the crisis began as an epidemic of overprescribed painkillers in the distressed communities that were least likely to muster the resources to fight back.”

I look forward to Macy’s next book and hope that she hears more from the distressed community of pain patients. They need a champion to fight for them too, not more gaslighting.

'Bend or Break' Raises Awareness About Invisible Illness

By Madora Pennington, PNN Columnist

Even though he was just a kid, people called Mitch Martow lazy. Too exhausted to maintain friendships and falling asleep in school, his classmates thought he was strange. Specialists couldn’t find a medical reason for his complaints, and psychiatrists had no answers either. Even morphine didn’t ease the pain that tortured him in his early teens.

One day, worn out from physical suffering that was compounded by so many doctors saying his pain was a mental issue, Mitch attempted suicide. He cried when he awoke in the ICU because he had not succeeded.

This is the story told in the documentary “Bend or Break.” Based mainly on Mitch’s blog posts, the film features interviews with Mitch and his family about how his mysterious illness turned their lives upside down and how a correct diagnosis changed all of that.

Mitch has Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS), a term for a number of similar, poorly understood disorders where the body fails to make stable collagen. As a result, the person has extreme flexibility, to the extent that their joints can bend backward.

With no obvious outward signs, many of us with EDS go decades without a diagnosis, despite frequently seeking care for its debilitating and perplexing symptoms.

MITCH MARTOW

When he was finally diagnosed correctly, Mitch’s family was troubled because EDS is under-researched and lacks effective treatments. For Mitch, his diagnosis made him happy: he was not crazy and could find others like him, which meant everything. It was the end of isolation.

To tell the story, Bend or Break showcases a young contortionist and dancer, Toria Summerville. Toria also has Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, so she is capable of astounding feats of flexibility. Interspersed with the interview segments are Toria’s beautifully choreographed dances that express the emotionality of the Martow family’s experience.

‘I Felt Very Alone’

Toria was 19 when she participated in the documentary, but her performance has the maturity and depth of someone much older. From childhood, she always knew she was different but didn’t know why. With no understanding of what was wrong, it was up to her to get by and cope with unacknowledged and unaddressed symptoms.

When she was 5 or 6 years old, Toria would be awake all night, crying in pain. Doctors said it was growing pains. When she was in the 6th grade, she was put on medication for anxiety and depression. Doctors assumed she had an eating disorder, but she was allergic to many foods, a common problem with EDS.

“I felt very alone growing up and very confused with myself. I knew something was going on, but I didn’t know what,” Talia says.

She struggled with brain fog and fatigue. Her differences attracted comments from other kids, which felt like bullying. In dance class, others would laugh at her inability to control her superhuman flexibility.

Toria was often getting injured with dislocating joints and easy bruising. Concerned guidance counselors would ask if anyone was abusing her. Well-meaning adults put her in a peer support group, but she could not relate to the other kids. There, therapists offered helpful tools, but they were not what Toria needed, so it felt even more isolating.

At a performing arts high school, Toria found understanding. Her circus coach instinctively understood her and took her under his wing. “We worked on abilities that my body could do,” she says.

For Bend or Break, Toria dedicated herself to understanding and demonstrating what the Martow family experienced, a process that was emotionally challenging, not only because of what Mitch went through but because much of it hit close to home. She walked a fine line.

“I had to be sensitive that it was Mitch’s story, not mine. I had to be in tune with all the milestones he was going through and portray that with my movements and facial expressions,” she explained.

In one sequence, she dances in a straitjacket, an idea she came up with from the feeling of being trapped by so many misdiagnoses herself.

Bend or Break concludes with interviews of others with EDS. Like Mitch, they look perfectly healthy. No one would guess how debilitating their EDS problems are. The documentary drives home the difficulty of having an invisible illness — one not indicated by obvious signs of impairment. People with invisible illnesses and disabilities have a hard time getting believed.

Toria hopes Bend or Break will spread awareness about EDS to the general population and medical professionals in every field. Had she been diagnosed correctly at an earlier age, Toria could have avoided many injuries and gotten better help in school.

“We need to cut back the time to get a diagnosis. My life would have been a lot easier if I had known about EDS sooner,” she says.

Mitch has seen firsthand the positive effects Bend or Break is having. Medical doctors have thanked him for the film because it helped them understand patients with EDS or other invisible illnesses. He’s also spoken to psychology students who have watched the film and is hopeful that when they start working as mental health professionals, they’ll be cautious about insisting that a patient’s chronic pain is psychosomatic.

The film encourages healthcare providers to be careful with diagnoses like "conversion disorder," where a symptom is assumed to be mental because no physical cause can be found. Being treated that way nearly destroyed Mitch’s life. “I tried to use suicide to escape from it,” he says.

Madora Pennington is the author of the blog LessFlexible.com about her life with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome. She graduated from UC Berkeley with minors in Journalism and Disability Studies. 

Ketamine and Oxytocin Provide Pain Relief for Arachnoiditis

By Dr. Forest Tennant, PNN Columnist

Nearly every day we receive an email from someone who is having trouble getting enough pain medication to give them a good quality of life.  In this age of opioid restrictions, there is hope. 

In the past, opioids and gamma amino butyric acid (GABA) substitutes such as diazepam (Valium) and gabapentin (Neurontin) have been the mainstays for pain control of adhesive arachnoiditis (AA). Today, there are alternatives that can enhance your current program to give you better pain control.

Low dose naltrexone is the initial pain reliever recommended to newly diagnosed AA cases. There are two other potent pain relievers that can be used with both naltrexone and opioids to achieve better pain relief: ketamine and oxytocin. Either agent is a good opioid substitute.

Ketamine provides pain relief primarily by suppressing a nerve receptor called N-methyl-d-aspartate. It can be taken by several non-oral routes of administration: nasal, injectable, sublingual or troche (dissolvable tablet).

Oxytocin (not to be confused with oxycodone or OxyContin) is a hormone that is a natural pain reliever. It surges in a woman’s body at the time of delivery to provide pain relief. It acts by activating the endorphin (opioid) receptors and by blocking nerve impulses between the brain and spinal cord.

Every community now has one or more pharmacies that will compound or “make” formulations of ketamine or oxytocin. We favor under-the-tongue (sublingual) or buccal (cheek) formulations.

Ketamine and/or oxytocin can be taken between opioid dosages or within 5 to 10 minutes before or after an opioid dosage to make the opioid stronger and last longer.

Ketamine and oxytocin can be used separately or used as combination therapy. Starting dosages of ketamine are 10-15 mg and oxytocin 10-20 units, which are administered within 10 minutes of each other. Dosages can later be raised above the starting dose.

We find the combination of ketamine and oxytocin to provide equal or better pain relief that most prescription opioids. Neither ketamine nor oxytocin are opioids, so there is no bias or resistance to their use. Also, overdoses are essentially not known to occur with regular dosages.

Forest Tennant, MD, DrPH, is retired from clinical practice but continues his research on the treatment of intractable pain and arachnoiditis. This column is adapted from a bulletin recently issued by the Arachnoiditis Research and Education Project. Readers interested in subscribing to the bulletins should click here.

The Tennant Foundation gives financial support to Pain News Network and sponsors PNN’s Patient Resources section.   

Misuse of Rx Opioids by Young Adults Falls to Record Lows

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

The misuse of prescription opioids by young adults has fallen to the lowest levels ever recorded, according to an annual survey that’s been tracking drug use in the U.S. since 1975. The Monitoring the Future (MTF) survey also found that use of marijuana and hallucinogens by young adults rose to an all-time high last year.

The MTF survey and annual report is a joint project of the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and the University of Michigan. Over 28,000 people were surveyed last year, including young adults aged 19 to 30 and adults aged 35 to 60.

Only 1.7% of young adults reported using “narcotics other than heroin,” a poorly named category that refers to the non-medical use of prescription opioids such as hydrocodone and oxycodone. Misuse of prescription opioids has been in a steep decline since reaching a peak of 8.9% in 2006.

NON-MEDICAL USE OF Rx OPIOIDS BY YOUNG ADULTS AGED 19-30

Source: Monitoring the Future

“One of the best ways we can learn more about drug use and its impact on people is to observe which drugs are appearing, in which populations, for how long and under which contexts,” said Megan Patrick, PhD, a research professor and principal investigator of the MTF study. 

“Monitoring the Future and similar large-scale surveys on a consistent sample population allow us to assess the effects of ‘natural experiments’ like the pandemic. We can examine how and why drugs are used and highlight critical areas to guide where the research should go next and to inform public health interventions.”

The MTF survey reflects the declining role that prescription opioids have in the U.S. drug epidemic, which is primarily fueled by illicit fentanyl and other street drugs. According to the IQVIA Institute, a healthcare data tracking firm, prescription opioid use has fallen by 48% over the past five years and now stands at levels last seen in 2000.

Once the most widely prescribed drug in the United States, hydrocodone (Vicodin) prescriptions have plummeted since the opioid was reclassified as a Schedule II Controlled Substance in 2014 and became harder to obtain.

According to the MTF survey, only 1.3% of young adults reported using Vicodin last year, down from a peak of 9.2% in 2009.

VICODIN USE BY YOUNG ADULTS AGED 19-30

Source: Monitoring the Future

Marijuana and Hallucinogens

While fewer younger adults are misusing prescription opioids, they are using marijuana and hallucinogens far more often.

Daily marijuana use (use on 20 or more occasions in the past 30 days) in 2021 reached the highest levels ever recorded since the MTF survey started monitoring it in 1988. Daily marijuana use was reported by 11% of young adults last year, up from 8% in 2016 and 6% in 2011.

In 2021, 8% of young adults reported using a hallucinogen such as LSD, ecstasy or psilocybin, an all-time high since the category was first surveyed in 1988. By comparison, only 3% reported using hallucinogens a decade earlier.

“As the drug landscape shifts over time, this data provides a window into the substances and patterns of use favored by young adults. We need to know more about how young adults are using drugs like marijuana and hallucinogens, and the health effects that result from consuming different potencies and forms of these substances,” NIDA Director Nora Volkow, MD, said in a news release.

“Young adults are in a critical life stage and honing their ability to make informed choices. Understanding how substance use can impact the formative choices in young adulthood is critical to help position the new generations for success.”

Alcohol remains the most-used substance among young adults, by far, with nearly 82% reporting alcohol use last year, unchanged from 2020. However, binge drinking (five or more drinks) rebounded to 32% in 2021 from an historic low in 2020, during the early stages of COVID-19 pandemic. 

Fewer Opioids and Weaker Doses for Cancer Patients

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Another study has documented how opioid guidelines over the past decade have led to fewer and weaker opioid prescriptions for cancer patients --- even though the treatment guidelines typically state they are not intended for patients suffering from cancer pain.

In findings recently published in PLOS ONE, researchers at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the University of Michigan analyzed pharmacy claims for up to 53 million privately insured U.S. adults from 2012 to 2019. During that period, opioid prescribing fell from 49.7% to 30.5% for people with chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) and from 86% to 78.7% for people with cancer.

While the drop in prescribing appears minor for cancer patients, a closer look at the numbers shows a significant decline in high dose prescriptions and in the number of days opioids were prescribed.

In 2012, for example, the average daily dose for a cancer patient was 62.4 morphine milligram equivalents (MME). By 2019, that had fallen to 44.7 MME – a decline of over 28 percent.

The percentage of cancer patients getting over 90 MME — a ceiling recommended by the CDC for chronic non-cancer pain — fell from 26.2% to just 7.6% -- a 71 percent decrease.

The average number of days per year a cancer patient received opioids also fell, from 34.8 days to 22.3 days – a 36 percent decline.

“While clinical guidelines continue to endorse prescription opioid treatment for cancer-related pain, declines in receipt of any opioid prescription were observed for people with cancer diagnoses, though these declines were smaller in magnitude than those observed among people with CNCP diagnoses. Future research is needed to understand the clinical implications of this decline, as well as observed decreases in MME/day and days’ supply of opioid prescriptions, among cancer patients,” researchers reported.

In short, cancer patients are getting smaller and fewer doses of opioids, which researchers admit could be making their cancer pain worse. However, they stopped short of sounding the alarm over that trend and suggest it could be beneficial – by helping to reduce the risk of cancer patients overdosing.  

“On the one hand, this finding may signal a cooling effect on opioid prescribing that could contribute to poorly controlled cancer pain. On the other hand, this finding may suggest reductions in high-risk opioid prescribing practices, such as high dosage prescribing, which are shown to contribute to increased risk of opioid overdose death among cancer patients,” they wrote.

Oncology experts have been warning for years that opioid prescribing guidelines are being misapplied to cancer patients, even to women with advanced breast cancer.

In 2019, a Rite Aid pharmacist refused to fill an opioid prescription for April Doyle, a California woman with Stage 4 terminal breast cancer.  A tearful video she posted online went viral and the pharmacy apologized to Doyle, who later died.

That same year, the Cancer Action Network warned there has been “a significant increase in cancer patients and survivors being unable to access their opioid prescriptions.” One out of four said a pharmacy had refused to fill their prescriptions and nearly a third reported their insurer refused to pay them.

Part of the confusion about what’s appropriate for cancer pain is that the CDC’s opioid guideline says the recommendations are intended for patients “who have completed cancer treatment, are in clinical remission, and are under cancer surveillance only.”  Experts say the inclusion of cancer survivors is a mistake because it is not uncommon for pain to persist long after the cancer is treated or even because of the treatment itself.  

A revised draft version of the CDC guideline attempts to clear up some of the confusion by explicitly stating the recommendations are not intended for patients undergoing “cancer pain treatment” and for those in palliative or end-of-life care. The updated version of the CDC guideline is expected to be published late this year.

Should Gabapentin Be Used for Dental Pain?

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Since it was first approved as an anti-seizure medication in the 1990’s, gabapentin (Neurontin) has become one of the most widely studied and prescribed drugs in world.  Although gabapentin is only approved by the FDA for epilepsy and postherpetic neuralgia (shingles), it is widely prescribed off-label for fibromyalgia, neuropathy and many other types of pain.

Hundreds of clinical trials have been conducted to find new uses for gabapentin -- for everything from asthma and obesity to alcoholism and improving your sex life. Gabapentin has been pitched for so many different conditions that a drug company executive infamously called it “snake oil.”

Now gabapentin is being touted as a “promising alternative” to opioids for dental pain. In a new study at the University of Rochester Medical Center’s Eastman Institute for Oral Health (EIOH), researchers found that gabapentin, when combined with ibuprofen or acetaminophen, was more effective than opioids in relieving pain after tooth extractions.  

“We hypothesized that using a combination of the non-opioid pain medications and adding gabapentin to the mix for pain would be an effective strategy to minimize or eliminate opioids for dental pain,” said Yanfang Ren, DDS, a dentistry professor at EIOH.   

Ren and his colleagues treated over 7,000 patients at an urgent dental care clinic with different combinations of opioids, ibuprofen, acetaminophen and gabapentin after tooth extractions. The “failure rates” of the medications were determined by how often patients returned to the clinic for additional pain relief.

The study findings, published in JAMA Network Open, found that non-opioid medications, including those with gabapentin, had failure rates significantly lower than opioids.      

Dental Pain Failure Rates

• 0.9% Acetaminophen/ibuprofen

• 3.4% Gabapentin/acetaminophen

• 5.3% Gabapentin/ibuprofen

• 9.2% Codeine/acetaminophen

• 19.4% Hydrocodone/acetaminophen

• 31.3% Other opioid combinations

Providers at the dental clinic have already put their findings into practice by sharply reducing the use of opioids. Prior to that, about 1,800 patients at the clinic were treated each year with opioids. Researchers estimate the reduced opioid prescribing may have prevented 105 of those patients from developing a problem with “persistent opioid use.”

“This study represents continued efforts by our team and other dentists to minimize the use of opioids for dental pain,” said Eli Eliav, DMD, the director of EIOH. “Additional studies, preferably randomized controlled clinical trials, are needed to confirm the safety and effectiveness of this approach. It is our duty to continuously seek safe and effective treatment for our patients in pain.”

Gabapentin has issues of its own. Patients prescribed gabapentin often complain of mood swings, depression, dizziness, fatigue and drowsiness, and a 2019 review found little evidence gabapentin should be used off-label to treat pain. There are also many reports that gabapentin is being abused and sold on the streets because it can heighten the effects of other drugs.

Medical Gaslighting: When Your Doctor Makes You Feel Crazy

By Madora Pennington, PNN Columnist

"Gaslighting" describes the act of deceiving someone to make that person question themselves. It is a toxic interpersonal exchange, an act of psychological abuse that causes the recipient to doubt their own experiences and judgments.

According to sociologists, gaslighters are often insecure, and withhold approval or use hostility to gain the recipient's compliance. The gaslightee is motivated to go along with gaslighting to save the relationship.

This relationship pattern is eerily familiar in the medical exam room. The patient arrives, tells the doctor their symptoms, and expects the doctor to diagnose and treat them. The doctor has the same idea of how their interaction should play out.

“Medical gaslighting” occurs when a healthcare provider dismisses a patient’s symptoms or health concerns. Instead of listening, doing research or referring the patient to a more qualified specialist, the doctor disregards the patient’s issues, blames the patient, or declares the symptoms normal.

The doctor may even diagnose the patient with "conversion disorder" and state in their medical records that the patient’s symptoms are the result of psychological stress or even a personality disorder.

Missed Diagnosis

What happens when the doctor is wrong and a patient is misdiagnosed with conversion disorder?

Kristy Collins knows what that is like. She sought help at multiple facilities for her disabling symptoms, but instead was labeled as having conversion disorder. Kristy had her worst experiences at teaching hospitals.

“It felt like the doctor was in a position as a professor, being looked at by students who expected to have an answer. Not having one, the doctor seemed stumped, even humiliated,” she told me.

That's when the doctor announced that Kristy had a conversion disorder and entered the diagnostic code for it on her medical chart -- essentially a reason to stop treating her. She was soon discharged.

At another office visit, a psychiatrist asked Kristy about her relationship with her father. “I’ve seen a softer side to him because of my medical problems,” Kristy answered. The psychiatrist ran with this, declaring that Kristy yearned for her father’s love.

Kristy and her father were mystified by that because they had always been close. She had no need to invent medical problems to get his attention or to spend time with him. But there was no changing the doctor’s mind.

At one point, Kristy’s father begged her doctors to tell him where they could get her conversion disorder treated. They were willing to pay out-of-pocket for care, if that meant Kristy could get better. The doctors had no place to recommend. They merely insisted she get in an ambulance to go home.

It turned out that Kristy was suffering from undiagnosed and difficult-to-recognize genetic problems. They were the real causes behind her mysterious medical issues. A neurosurgeon at Children’s Hospital of Orange County diagnosed her with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, Chiari malformation and hydrocephalus.

Kristy says she is not angry at the medical community, even after all the horrible treatment she'd been through. That’s in part because of the doctor who finally diagnosed her correctly.

“He hugged me and apologized for all of the bad doctors. That allowed me to forgive,” she said.

For Kristy, that appointment was healing.

Madora Pennington is the author of the blog LessFlexible.com about her life with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome. She graduated from UC Berkeley with minors in Journalism and Disability Studies. 

Inflation Squeezes Families Dealing With Chronic Illness

By Heidi de Marco, Kaiser Health News  

Deborah Lewis rose from bed before dawn and signed in to her phone so she could begin delivering fast food, coffee and groceries to residents in this western patch of the Mojave Desert where test pilot Chuck Yeager broke the sound barrier generations ago.

Lewis prayed she would earn $75, just enough to fill the tank of her Kia sedan so she could drive her 8-year-old daughter, Annabelle, 80 miles south to Los Angeles to receive her weekly chemotherapy treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Just a year ago, the same tank of gas would have cost $30 less.

After a full shift as a gig worker, the mother had earned close to what she needed. “It took a lot longer than I thought,” she said.

High inflation is hitting families across the nation. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, consumer prices in July were up 8.5% from a year earlier, one of the biggest increases in recent decades. The Bureau of Economic Analysis found that consumers are spending the most on housing and utilities, food, and medical care.

For millions of families living with chronic diseases — such as heart disease, diabetes, and cancer — or other debilitating conditions, inflation is proving a punishing scourge that could be harmful to their health. Unlike dining out less or buying fewer clothes, many patients don’t have a choice when it comes to paying for medicine, medical supplies and other ancillary costs. Some must drive long distances to see a specialist, and others must adhere to a strict diet.

“Chronic disease patients are usually on the front lines of seeing a lack of supplies or an increase in out-of-pocket costs,” said Paul Conway, chair of policy and global affairs for the American Association of Kidney Patients.

Health care has grown increasingly unaffordable. Half of adults report having difficulty paying their health costs, according to KFF polling. One-third say they or a family member has skipped recommended medical treatment in the past year because of the cost, and one-quarter of adults report rationing pills or leaving prescriptions unfilled.

Inflation has squeezed families further by driving up the price of gas and food, as well as medical products such as needles and bed-wetting pads. Health care costs have risen 5.1% since July 2021, and medical commodities — which include prescription and over-the-counter drugs, medical equipment and supplies — are up 3.7%.

Inflation is particularly detrimental to the health of low-income patients; studies have found a strong link between poverty and health. According to the California Budget & Policy Center, more than half of California households making $50,000 or less struggle to pay for food, housing, and medical costs.

For Deborah Lewis and her husband, Spencer, their concerns about the rising cost of gas have never been about skimping on summer travel or weekend getaways. It’s about making sure they have enough gas to drive Annabelle to Children’s Hospital Los Angeles for chemotherapy and other medications delivered through a port in her chest.

The family relies on Spencer’s disability check, which he receives because he has Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, a hereditary disorder that causes him severe joint pain. He also copes with broken discs in his spine and a cyst pushing against his spinal nerves. In January, he stopped working as a pest control technician, shifting more financial responsibilities to his wife.

The disability check covers rent and utilities, leaving Deborah’s freelance work to cover gas. They also get $500 a month from Miracles for Kids, which helps families with critically ill children.

On a June morning, Deborah packed snacks for the drive ahead as Annabelle, wrapped in her favorite blanket, waited on the couch. Most of her long blond hair has fallen out because of her treatments.

The night before, Deborah spent $73.24 to fill up at Costco. The average price of a gallon of gas in California remains above $5.

Before they left, Deborah learned the couple carried a negative balance in their checking account. “I have so much on my plate,” she said.

The family has already delayed health care for one family member: Their dog, a Doberman pinscher named Chief, skipped a vet visit for a mass pushing up his intestines.

AnNABELLE AND HER MOTHER, DEBORAH LEWIS (khn IMAGE)

Politicians are keenly aware of inflation’s leaching effects. In October, most California households will receive “inflation-relief checks” of up to $1,050 to help offset the high cost of gas and other goods under a budget Gov. Gavin Newsom signed in June.

But health experts worry that even with the one-time aid, affordability could become a life-or-death issue for some Californians. For example, the price of insulin can range from $300 to $400 per vial without insurance.

“We’ve seen a number of patients living with diabetes and on a fixed income greatly impacted by rising inflation,” said Matthew Freeby, an endocrinologist and director of the UCLA Gonda Diabetes Center. “Both Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes typically require multiple prescription medications that may already be costly. Patients have had to choose between day-to-day finances and their lifesaving medications, such as insulin or other treatments.”

Inflation is also a challenge for people who depend on certain foods as part of their health care regimen, especially with food prices up 10.9% in the past year.

Toyan Miller, 60, an integrative nutritional health practitioner from San Dimas, California, has been diagnosed with vasculitis and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, two autoimmune diseases that cause inflammation. Miller’s medically tailored diet requires gluten-free, organic food. Miller said she’s dipping into her savings to afford the average of $300 she spends each week on groceries. Last year, she spent about $100 less.

“The avocado mayonnaise price freaked me out,” she said. “It used to be $8. Now, it’s $16.99.”

Even those who are healthy may find themselves helping family or friends in need.

In the mountainous Los Angeles neighborhood of Laurel Canyon, Shelley Goldstein, 60, helps her parents, both in their 90s, pay for items, such as incontinence products, not covered by health insurance. Goldstein’s father was recently diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease and lives in a retirement community with his wife, Doris.

“Those are basic things, but that’s like $70 a month between the two of them,” said Goldstein, who works as a speaking coach. “That’s a lot.”

Goldstein worries about how much more of her parents’ health costs she’ll have to shoulder since they are pensioners on fixed incomes.

“What keeps me up at night right now is what’s to come,” she said. “There’s two of them. My parents’ increased need for pads, meds, and other medical support increases as their health declines.”

Kaiser Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues. This story first published on California Healthline, a service of the California Health Care Foundation.

Evidence Used to Justify CDC Opioid Guideline ‘No Longer Present’

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Anti-opioid activists and public health officials have long argued that opioid “overprescribing” fueled the overdose crisis in the United States, causing drug deaths to surge to record levels.

“This rise is directly correlated with increased prescribing for chronic pain,” Dr. Jane Ballantyne, then-president of Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing (PROP), wrote in a 2015 letter to the National Institutes of Health.

That claim was repeated the following year by the CDC when the agency released its controversial opioid guideline. “Overprescribing opioids – largely for chronic pain – is a key driver of America’s drug overdose epidemic,” then-CDC director Dr. Thomas Frieden said in a news release.   

But a new analysis debunks the overprescribing myth, finding the “direct correlations” cited by Frieden, Ballantyne and others are no longer valid, if they ever were.

In a study recently published in Frontiers of Pain Research, independent researchers Larry Aubry and B. Thomas Carr examined opioid prescribing trends and overdose deaths from 2010 to 2019, using the same data sources that the CDC guideline is based on.

“The direct correlations used to justify the CDC guideline… are no longer present,” they reported.

Aubry and Carr found that opioid prescribing, when measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MME), was in steep decline years before the guideline was even released. That trend accelerated even further when regulators, insurers and healthcare providers started following the CDC’s recommendations.

If the overprescribing theory were true, you would expect drug deaths to go down as opioid sales did. But in subsequent years, overdoses linked to prescription opioids stayed flat and drug deaths surged even higher. In research terms, that is known as a “negative correlation” -- a trend not supported by facts.

Looking at data from all 50 states, Aubry and Carr found “significant negative correlation” in 38 states between overdoses and prescription opioids, and a positive correlation in only 2 states. In 10 states, there appeared to be no relationship at all. That calls into question ones of the primary recommendations of the CDC guideline; that daily opioid doses not exceed 90 MME.

“This recommendation is not supported by the available data. Regression analyses of (total opioid deaths, opioid overdose deaths, opioid treatment admissions, and prescription opioid sales) among patients receiving doses of at least 90 MME/day show significant negative relationships, indicating that lower (prescription opioid sales) in this high-dosage cohort do not correspond to lower death rates,” Aubry and Carr reported.

The CDC estimates that over 107,000 people died of overdoses in 2021, well above the 63,600 drug deaths reported in 2016, the year the guideline was released.

Negative Correlation Between Overdoses and Opioid Prescribing

sOURCE: FRONTIERS OF PAIN RESEARCH

Patient Outcomes Not Being Monitored

Even more concerning is that the CDC does not appear to be tracking the impact of its 2016 guideline on pain patients, even as it prepares a long-delayed update to the guideline. As PNN has reported, the CDC ignored warnings from its own consultants that the agency “should consider conducting more research” on patients, many of whom were abruptly tapered or abandoned by their doctors after the guideline’s release.

“Reasonable judgment would dictate tracking and reporting of chronic pain patient outcomes (deaths, suicides, returns in benefits, reported pain, function, etc.) for individuals since the guideline or the guideline update. However, there appears to be no publicly available evidence that a monitoring process is required or is planned to measure and confirm outcomes,” Aubry and Carr wrote.

PROP is not following the data either. In a recent debate, PROP board member Adriane Fugh-Berman claimed that pain patients addicted to prescription opioids were still fueling the overdose epidemic, even though illicit fentanyl and other street drugs are linked to the vast majority of deaths.

“Those patients went to the street. They got addicted to heroin. The reason those deaths went up is because the illicit supply of opioids has become laced with fentanyl and has become highly dangerous,” Fugh-Berman said, without citing any evidence. “It’s not that prescription opioids have nothing to do with it.  Many patients started on prescription opioids ended up on the streets looking for heroin. They’re dying because the illicit opioid products have become extremely dangerous. That’s what’s killing people.”

Fugh-Berman is not an unbiased observer. She and at least five other PROP board members have testified as paid expert witnesses in opioid litigation cases, making as much as $850 an hour for their testimony blaming drug makers for the opioid crisis.

A recent analysis of overdose deaths in 2020 found that prescription opioids ranked well behind illicit fentanyl, alcohol, cocaine, methamphetamine and heroin as the leading cause of drug deaths.   

At least one critic of opioid prescribing feels it’s time to change the focus on why so many Americans are overdosing. Beth Macy, who wrote the best-selling book “Dopesick,” says drug use has changed. 

“At this point, too much attention is focused on stemming the oversupply of prescription opioids. We now have a generation of drug users that started with heroin and fentanyl.”

— Beth Macy, author of "Dopesick"

“At this point, too much attention is focused on stemming the oversupply of prescription opioids,” Macy writes in her new book, ‘Raising Lazarus.’ “We now have a generation of drug users that started with heroin and fentanyl.”

As for the CDC, a spokesperson tells PNN the agency won’t publish its guideline revision until late this year, nearly seven years after the original guideline was released. 

“CDC is currently in the process of revising the draft update to the 2016 Guideline based on comments received during the public comment period and peer review. We anticipate the final Guideline will be released later this year,” the spokesperson said.

Why I Still Take Precautions Against Covid

By Victoria Reed, PNN Columnist

We are three years into the Covid-19 pandemic, and while life has still not returned to normal, it’s understandable for people to be tired of hearing about the virus and less concerned about catching it. Scientists know more about covid and have developed tools to treat and even prevent the most serious outcomes.

But many of us who are suffering from chronic illness or chronic pain are still wearing masks, practicing social distancing and taking other precautions.

As I go out and about in my daily life, I’ve noticed that mask use is somewhat minimal. People don’t seem to be as concerned about the virus and its variants, even as cases are skyrocketing again. I’m one of the few who still wears a mask in crowded indoor places, airplanes and restaurants.

Fortunately, I have not yet been infected with covid. I attribute that to always being cautious in public (sometimes even outside) and when around family members who I know aren’t taking precautions. Being vaccinated and boosted is another layer of protection I believe has helped me.

The choice to be vaccinated is a personal one and should not be looked at as a political issue or be a source of ridicule. The same goes for mask use. Sometimes people look at me funny because I still wear a mask, but I am “allowed” to do that, just as others are equally allowed to stop wearing theirs.

I don’t judge people who choose not to wear a mask, and conversely, I shouldn’t be judged for wearing one.

Part of my caution comes from having a dysfunctional and overactive immune system, which is altered by a medication I take to control symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This medication suppresses a certain part of the immune system that is implicated in the development of RA.  Rheumatoid arthritis primarily attacks the joints, but can also attack the heart, lungs and eyes.

Having to take this particular med (commonly called a biologic), makes me more vulnerable to contracting all types of infection, including covid. It also makes it more difficult to recover from infections and can lead to serious or even deadly complications. 

In addition, the threat of possibly ending up with long covid, when symptoms linger for months or longer, is a concern of mine, especially since fatigue is a major part of long covid syndrome. Profound and disabling fatigue is also a feature of RA and fibromyalgia, so anything I can do to prevent another illness that causes fatigue is important to me. Even mild cases of covid can cause long covid, according to researchers.

Covid can also lead to physical complications. Studies have shown that the virus can cause neurological problems, difficulty breathing, joint or muscle pain, blood clots or other vascular issues, chest pain and unpleasant digestive symptoms.

Furthermore, the virus has been associated with increased psychological problems, such as depression and anxiety. The media has reported on the unfortunate suicides of people who had been suffering from long covid and were unable to get any relief besides ending their own lives.

In the long term, it remains to be seen how covid will affect the millions of us who are already suffering from chronic pain and illness. Fortunately, there are treatments that help with the symptoms and recovery for the majority of people who become infected. There are also medications that can save the lives of those who are at high risk of severe illness.

As more time passes, I’m sure other treatments will emerge, and I’m hopeful that as a chronic pain sufferer with multiple chronic illnesses, I will be okay if I do someday end up getting sick with covid.

Victoria Reed lives in northeast Ohio. She suffers from endometriosis, fibromyalgia, degenerative disc disease and rheumatoid arthritis.