Lack of Awareness Is Harming People with Scoliosis

By Drs. Sanja Schreiber and Emily Somers

Cael was a typical 15-year-old — until the discovery of an already advanced abnormal curvature of his spine.

“I felt like the Hunchback of Notre Dame,” Cael told CBC News, recalling the emotionally draining and gruesome two-year wait for spinal surgery during which his curve progressed to a whopping 108 degrees.

Scoliosis is an abnormal twisting and curving of the spine that can develop at any age, but mostly occurs during rapid growth spurts in children, and as part of spine aging in adults over the age of 60.

Of all types of scoliosis in children, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is the most prevalent, accounting for as many as nine in 10 cases and impacting up to one in 20 adolescents globally. On the other end of the age spectrum, a staggering two-thirds of older adults are also affected.

In clinical care, research and education related to scoliosis, disparities persist worldwide. Despite its widespread prevalence, scoliosis often goes undiagnosed, or has delayed diagnosis as in Cael’s case. It also receives limited attention in clinical and public health education, leading to significant gaps in health care.

This general lack of awareness has serious implications for thousands of people like Cael.

Gaps in Scoliosis Care

In the United States, fewer than half of states legislate school-based scoliosis screening in children. Even worse, Canada discontinued screening back in 1979 because it was not considered cost-effective.

Pediatricians’ screening practices vary, and some cases of scoliosis in children are only discovered when an unrelated chest X-ray reveals a curved spine. With about 30 per cent of cases being hereditary, parents may not recognize the signs early on.

The recommended care in North America involves bracing for mild to moderate curves (25° to 45°) and surgery for curves exceeding 45°. Shockingly, 32 per cent of Canadian children, like Cael, face delayed referrals, discovering significant curves when they finally see specialists.

Despite documented success in managing scoliosis through early screening, exercise rehabilitation and brace treatment, global health-care education often neglects this condition.

The general lack of global awareness leaves physicians, nurses and other practitioners unaware of effective treatments and referral processes, contributing to the misunderstanding and under-treatment of patients. Consequently, when children with scoliosis eventually reach specialists for care, they may encounter challenges navigating the health-care system as they transition into adulthood.

Sex Disparities

It is unclear why adolescent idiopathic scoliosis affects mainly girls. The more severe the curve, the more likely the patient is female.

Due to their specific biology, females also face a five-fold higher risk of progressive deformities and are 10 times more likely, compared to males, to require surgery.

Despite generally uncomplicated pregnancies and deliveries, women with scoliosis often face difficulties receiving pain control during labour, with higher epidural failure rates.

Moreover, they often suffer pregnancy-related back pain, and their spine curvature may worsen after pregnancy.

Healthcare Barriers

Healthcare access in the U.S. is influenced by a range of factors including race, income and health insurance coverage.

Patients with better insurance plans tend to seek pediatric orthopedic care at a younger age. Those with public insurance tend to have worse spine curvatures by the time they reach a scoliosis specialist; this is particularly striking among Black patients with public insurance, who are 67 per cent less likely to be diagnosed at a stage early enough for effective brace treatment compared to Black patients with private insurance.

While Canada’s health-care system covers spinal fusion for severe scoliosis, the lack of a national insurance program in the U.S. leads to varying out-of-pocket expenses for patients.

Those without insurance often cannot afford surgery at all.

But even with Canada’s universal coverage, patients typically wait an entire year for surgery due to a shortage of providers. Because of regional variability in resources such as access to spinal surgeons, funding and specialized facilities, some kids, like Cael, wait even longer, experiencing physical, emotional and psychological burdens, while their curves get progressively worse.

Delayed surgery in Canada cost the health-care system $44.6 million due to more complex surgeries, extended hospital stays, readmission and re-operation rates.

Lack of Research

Ongoing gender disparities in the healthcare workforce and lack of research funding for this female-predominant condition continue to hamper effective action.

Fewer than five per cent of spinal surgeons identify as women. Glass-ceiling effects surround women surgeons in this male-dominated culture, perpetuating gendered training environments, being held to higher standards and earning lower wages. The dearth of senior women role models and mentors is a further barrier for career advancement and retention.

Furthermore, research funding for diseases, such as scoliosis, that mainly affect females has historically lagged far behind funding for male-predominant diseases. Improving workforce diversity is an important facet of addressing health disparities and shaping research agendas.

Inequities abound in scoliosis care and research. The impact of lack of awareness and delayed care extends beyond physical challenges. The patient and their family suffer emotionally, incurring significant financial burden while fearing the future.

The message is clear, we must do better for this underserved population.

Sanja Schreiber, PhD, is an Adjunct Professor of Physical Therapy at the University of Alberta and the Owner/Director of Curvy Spine, a specialized clinic for treating structural spinal disorders and training physiotherapists in scoliosis rehabilitation.

Emily Somers, PhD, is an epidemiologist specializing in immune-mediated and musculoskeletal diseases. She also directs the Interdisciplinary Research & Team Science Program at the Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research.

This article originally appeared in The Conversation and is republished with permission.

‘Safe Supply’ of Rx Opioids Saved Lives in British Columbia

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Prescribing opioids and other medications to people with substance use disorders significantly reduces their risk of dying, according to a large new study in British Columbia. The findings add weight to efforts to create a “safe supply” of legal medications for patients at risk of an overdose from increasingly toxic street drugs.

Vancouver, British Columbia was the first major North American city to be hit by a wave of overdoses involving illicit fentanyl, a potent synthetic opioid. That led Vancouver to become a laboratory for harm reduction programs and safe supply sites offering prescription opioids and injectable heroin to drug users.  

How effective have those programs been?

A study by the B.C. Centre for Disease Control, recently published in the British Medical Journal, found that prescribing opioids, stimulants and anti-anxiety medication to nearly 6,000 drug users dramatically reduced their risk of death.

The Risk Mitigation Guide (RMG) program was initially launched in early 2020 to help drug users going through withdrawal while isolated by the COVID-19 quarantine. A year later, the program was extended, allowing doctors and nurse practitioners to prescribe hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, fentanyl, benzodiazepines and stimulants to drug users.

People who were given an initial dose of prescription opioids had a 61% lower risk of death from any cause the following week, and were 55% less likely to die of a drug overdose.

The protective effect of a safe supply increased as more doses were provided. Drug users who received four or more days of opioids were 91% less likely to die from any cause and 89% less likely to die from an overdose.

"We saw a profound impact on reduction in somebody's overdose death risk the week after they picked up these drugs, to a degree that is really surprising and has enormous potential," co-author Paxton Bach, MD, an addiction medicine specialist, told CBC News. "This paper is the strongest evidence we have so far, by a large margin, supporting the idea that this can be an effective strategy for reducing overdose death risk."

But critics of safe supply programs say they don’t really reduce drug abuse. An investigation last year by the National Post found that hydromorphone pills given to drug users in Vancouver were being sold to other addicts, with the sellers then using the money to buy more potent street drugs that were often laced with fentanyl.

A new study in JAMA Internal Medicine also found that opioid-related hospitalizations rose sharply in British Columbia after safe supply programs were launched there, although there was no significant change in overdose deaths. The spike in hospitalizations may have been due to more potent street drugs and counterfeit pills on the black market.

Since a public health emergency was declared in British Columbia in 2016, over 13,000 people have died from drug overdoses. A 2020 analysis found that only about 2% of the B.C. opioid-related deaths were caused by prescription opioids alone. The other overdoses mainly involved illicit fentanyl and other street drugs.  

FDA Finds ‘Credible Scientific Support’ for Marijuana as Pain Reliever

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

It took a lawsuit to prompt its release, but the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has finally made public a lengthy FDA review explaining why it thinks marijuana should be rescheduled as a Schedule III controlled substance. Such a move would make it legal under federal law for marijuana to be used for medically approved purposes, such as pain relief.

The FDA review was completed last August, nearly a year after it was requested by President Biden. But the 252-page review was not released until Friday, after a lawsuit was filed by two pro-cannabis lawyers when HHS didn’t respond to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests.

Medical marijuana is already legal in 38 states, but cannabis remains classified as a Schedule I substance by the Drug Enforcement Administration, making its sale or use illegal under federal law. The DEA is expected to make its decision on rescheduling soon.

The FDA looked at seven potential medical uses of cannabis: pain, anorexia, anxiety, epilepsy, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), nausea, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

After reviewing clinical studies of cannabis, and the views of academic and professional medical societies, the FDA said they found “mixed findings of effectiveness.” The strongest evidence was for pain relief, anorexia and nausea.

“The available data indicate that there is some credible scientific support for the use of marijuana in the treatment of pain.”

— FDA review

“The largest evidence base for effectiveness exists for marijuana use within the pain indication (in particular, neuropathic pain),” the FDA said. “On balance, the available data indicate that there is some credible scientific support for the use of marijuana in the treatment of pain, anorexia related to a medical condition, and nausea and vomiting, with varying degrees of support and consistency of findings.”

Perhaps just as importantly, the FDA found no evidence of “unacceptably high safety risks” when marijuana was used therapeutically. That is a key finding for marijuana to be rescheduled by the DEA. The risk of marijuana being used nonmedically was also low, compared to substances like alcohol, heroin, cocaine, prescription opioids and anti-anxiety drugs.

“The rank order of the comparators in terms of greatest adverse consequences typically places heroin, benzodiazepines and/or cocaine in the first or immediately subsequent positions, with marijuana in a lower place in the ranking, especially when a utilization adjustment is calculated. For overdose deaths, marijuana is always in the lowest ranking among comparator drugs,” FDA said.

“These evaluations demonstrate that there is consistency across databases, across substances, and over time that although abuse of marijuana produces clear evidence of a risk to public health, that risk is relatively lower than that posed by most other comparator drugs.”

The FDA said the “vast majority” of professional medical organizations do not recommend marijuana, but they don’t specifically recommend against it either. The lone exception is the American Psychiatric Association, which warns that long-term use of marijuana can worsen psychiatric conditions, such as paranoia and hallucinations.

Reclassifying marijuana as a Schedule III substance – in the same category as codeine and ketamine – would certainly be historic, but it won’t resolve the many differences between federal and state regulation of cannabis.

Under federal law, legal access to Schedule III substances requires a prescription from a licensed doctor that is dispensed from a licensed pharmacy. Medical marijuana products would also have to go through the FDA’s lengthy and costly clinical trial process to assess their safety and effectiveness. Even if they pass that test, they would only be approved by FDA for certain conditions.  

Pain Patients Feel Abandoned by U.S. Healthcare System

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Many pain patients feel abandoned by the U.S. healthcare system and say it’s increasingly difficult to find a doctor or obtain opioid analgesics, according to a large new survey by Pain News Network. Some patients have turned to other substances – both legal and illegal -- for pain relief, and almost a third have contemplated suicide.

Nearly 3,000 pain patients or their caregivers participated in PNN’s online survey in the final weeks of 2023.

Over 90% of those with opioid prescriptions said they faced delays or problems last year getting their prescriptions filled at a pharmacy. Nearly a third were hoarding opioids because of fear they’ll not be able to get them in the future. And over 40% rated the quality of their pain care as “bad” or “very bad.”

“I’ve given up hope of getting help for chronic, severe pain in this country. I’m planning to move to where I can receive humane treatment,” one patient told us.

“The hoops in which I have had to jump through to get the minimal help that I have gotten throughout the years is ridiculous,” said another. “I have a very extensive and very well documented history of mental and physical trauma, but I am still treated as a drug seeker. I am currently unable to get any form of medication.”

“Every pain patient worries, from one month to the next, if their doctor will cut them off opioids or force taper them to such low levels that there is NO pain relief,” another patient wrote.

HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE CURRENT QUALITY OF YOUR PAIN CARE?

“I’ve spent the last 8 years explaining my inadequate pain control and lack of sleep that has fallen on deaf ears. I’ve tried so many different doctors and now feel like no one cares at all. Honestly feel as though they would rather see me die and be rid of me,” said another.

‘Impossible to Find Help’

About one in every four patients said they were tapered to a lower dose or taken off opioids — but only a small number were referred to addiction treatment. Less than one percent of those who stopped opioid treatment said it improved their pain and quality of life.

One in five patients couldn’t find a doctor to treat their pain. Many were abandoned by a physician or had a doctor who retired from clinical practice.   

• 20% Unable to find doctor willing to treat pain

• 14% Doctor retired or left their practice  

• 12% Abandoned or discharged by a doctor

• 27% Tapered to a lower dose or taken off opioids

• 3%   Received a referral for addiction treatment

• 0.6% Stopped opioids & pain and quality of life improved

“My primary retired. Then my rheumatologist moved to another state. Now most doctors don't prescribe and it's impossible to find help,” a patient wrote.

“Every pain management office in my area were nothing but nightmares waiting to happen. And every person I talked to… were solely concerned with either getting people off of pain medication or reducing the amount of medicine by over half,” said another.

“Doctors I talked to said they felt like they had a gun to their head and that they are being watched, so they won't prescribe or prescribe very little,” a patient wrote.

“My insurance just capped opioids to 7 days a month, so I have to choose whether to buy the other 3 weeks and cut back on my food budget, or take to my bed for 3 weeks a month,” said another.

“I am unable to find a new doctor to treat pain. A couple of years ago I was tapered from a previously working amount of pain med, so now I have daily severe pain and too many sleepless nights from pain. But the doc doesn't care. It seems my clinic system only sees me as an addict,” wrote another pain patient.

Risky Choices

With pain care increasingly difficult to find, nearly a third of patients said they considered suicide in the past year because their pain was so severe. Others adopted risky behaviors, such as hoarding opioid medication, obtaining opioids from another person, buying illicit substances off the black market, or using alcohol, cannabis and other substances for pain relief.    

• 29% Considered suicide

• 32% Hoarded opioid medication

• 30% Used cannabis for pain relief

• 14% Used alcohol for pain relief

• 11% Used kratom for pain relief

• 11% Obtained prescription opioids from friend, family or black market

•  4%  Used heroin, illicit fentanyl or illegal substance for pain relief

“I was taken off my prescription opioid twice and attempted suicide twice because the other prescriptions were not effective,” one patient told us.

“I have a therapist that has been helpful, because I have considered taking my life. He is concerned that I'm not getting adequate pain relief,” said another.

“Since suicide is against my faith, I prayed for death,” one patient wrote. 

“I know so many people that have stopped going to doctors and started buying heroin off the street. They say it’s easier and cheaper,” another patient said.

“The obscenely high cost of medical marijuana made me suffer so much financially that I have been unable to make use of the compassion center’s offerings,” wrote another patient. “Why on earth do we let plants be illegal in the first place, then let them be sold for so much money that they are almost impossible to afford on a disability income?”

“We desperately need to get away from the denial of opioids as a way to deal with this crisis. So far, the results of these laws on opioids have been an abject failure. Deaths have not been reduced, but actually increased due to chronic pain patients having to resort to suicide,” said another.

“I hope that all the people who are in charge of this will one day feel what I do and have some grasp of the pain situation people are forced to live through. They take care of their dogs and cats better than human beings,” a patient said.

“I have considered suicide multiple times over the past few years. These laws, while meant to curb illicit abuse of these medications, are harming legitimate patients like myself,” another patient wrote. “The worst part is that, for the time being, it looks like things are going to get much, much worse for me and the millions of others like me.” 

PNN’s online survey was conducted from November 13 to December 31, 2023. A total of 2,961 U.S. pain patients or caregivers participated. We’ll be releasing more results in the coming days.  

90% of Pain Patients Have Trouble Filling Opioid Prescriptions

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Nine out of ten pain patients with an opioid prescription in the United States experienced delays or problems in the past year getting their prescription filled at a pharmacy, according to a large new survey by Pain News Network.  Nearly 20% of patients were not able to get their opioid medication, even after contacting multiple pharmacies.

Over 2,800 pain patients participated in PNN’s online survey. Many were so frustrated with pharmacists being unable or unwilling to fill their opioid prescriptions that they turned to other substances for pain relief or contemplated suicide.

“My medication helps my pain be at a level I can tolerate. When I can't get it, I honestly feel like ending my life due to the pain. I wish they'd stop to realize there are those of us with a legitimate need,” one patient told us.

“The discrimination we receive, not to mention all the hurdles we are put through just being a chronic pain patient, is absolutely affecting my physical, mental, and emotional health. It’s only gotten worse, leaving myself and family to scramble looking for medication,” another patient said.

“The problem I've had this year is my pharmacy running out of my pain meds. Then it's a frantic and anxiety filled race to find one that will,” another patient wrote. “My regular medication has been Percocet for years and I haven't received that in almost a year. No pharmacies in this area have been able to get it.”

DID YOU EXPERIENCE DELAYS OR PROBLEMS GETTING YOUR OPIOID PRESCRIPTION FILLED AT A PHARMACY?

The U.S. is currently experiencing its worst drug shortages in a decade, with supplies running low for medications used to treat cancer, ADHD and diabetes. Less publicized are chronic shortages of oxycodone, hydrocodone and other opioids used to treat pain – shortages that that have gotten little, if any, attention from the White House, Congress, or federal health agencies like the CDC and FDA.  

While supply chain issues and low profit margins for generic medication are driving many of the drug shortages, the low supply of opioids is largely the result of policy and political decisions. Egged on by Congress, the DEA for eight straight years has cut opioid production quotas, reducing the supply of many opioids by over two-thirds in a failed attempt to bring the overdose crisis under control.

Opioid litigation has also played a major role in the shortages, with drug wholesalers and big pharmacy chains agreeing to limit the supply of opioids at each individual pharmacy as part of the $21 billion national opioid settlement.

Whatever the cause, American pain patients routinely run into problems when they try to get an opioid prescription filled. Nearly 85% said they were told by a pharmacist that their medication is temporarily out of stock, while 6% were told there is only enough to partially fill the prescription.

What was primary reason the pharmacist gave for not filling the prescription?

• 85% Opioid medication not in stock

• 6% Can only make partial fills

• 4% Insurance issue

• 3% Did not explain why

• 2% Might get in trouble or lose their job

• 1% Prescription too risky or inappropriate

Some pharmacists said they might get in trouble or lose their job if they filled the prescription, while others claimed the medication was inappropriate, too risky, or that there was an insurance issue. Many gave multiple excuses to patients.

“First it was that they didn’t have the full quantity in stock. They then tried to get me to take a partial fill, then they told me they needed a prescription for Narcan from the prescribing doctor, and then out of nowhere it’s not covered by my insurance,” one patient wrote.

“Pharmacy said that there were shortages everywhere and had no idea when they would have the oxycodone that I need daily for my lower back pain,” said another.

“Pharmacist stated that the medication was on back order. They also said that they don't know if they will ever get them back again,” a patient wrote.

“At first the pharmacist said both scripts were out of stock, then he said he could only do a partial fill. Then told me he couldn't fill my scripts anymore and to find a new pharmacy,” another frustrated patient explained.

Over 60% of patients did just that, by visiting or calling another pharmacy. That’s not as easy as it may sound. Over half said they contacted three or more pharmacies while trying to get their prescription filled.

Many were turned away, as pharmacies are often reluctant to take on new pain patients because that would make their rationed supply of opioids even tighter.  

“They had it in stock one month but the next month she told me she had to save them for her regular customers. Then she went on to say that Walgreens will no longer accept people with no insurance,” a patient wrote.

DID YOU HAVE TO FIND ANOTHER PHARMACY TO FILL THE PRESCRIPTION?

“Getting my monthly pain pills is a 3 ring circus joke. It takes 10 to 15 days of making calls covering 175 miles to make sure I can pick them up!” said another.

“CVS is only allowed so many hydrocodone a month and if my prescription doesn't get in ahead of somebody else's I'm screwed,” said a patient who lives with pain from fibromyalgia and osteoporosis. “Without it I am bed-bound and have to basically cry and crawl to the bathroom and back to bed.”

“The pharmacies try their best to fill your prescription, but if they don't have it in stock, they don't have it in stock,” another patient wrote. “It definitely affects the quality of life. You live in fear every month that this is going to be it.”

WERE YOU EVENTUALLY ABLE TO GET THE PRESCRIPTION FILLED?

PNN’s online survey was conducted from November 13 to December 31, 2023. A total of 2,826 U.S. pain patients or caregivers with an opioid prescription participated. We’ll be releasing more results in the coming days.  

Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome Have High Rates of Fibromyalgia

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

A large new study has found high rates of fibromyalgia in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), adding to a growing body of evidence linking gut bacteria to chronic pain disorders. IBS patients were also more likely to have chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS).

The study, recently published in the journal Biomedicines, looked at more than 1.2 million IBS patients hospitalized in the U.S. over a three-year period. They found that the prevalence rate of fibromyalgia in the IBS patients was 10.7 percent, about five times higher than the fibromyalgia rate (1.4%) in the general adult population.

Fibromyalgia is a poorly understood condition characterized by widespread body pain, headaches, fatigue, insomnia and mood disorders; while IBS causes abdominal pain, cramps, bloating, gas and diarrhea. Gut bacteria has been associated with both IBS and fibromyalgia, but the exact mechanism of action remains unclear.

“This is yet another example where ailments in the gut are linked to ailments elsewhere in the body and mind,” said senior author Yezaz Ghouri, MD, an assistant professor of clinical medicine and gastroenterology at the University of Missouri School of Medicine. “As we continue to learn more about how gut health effects health elsewhere it is important that clinicians look for and manage somatic comorbidities in IBS patients.”

Fibromyalgia and CFS are known as “somatic” disorders because patients who have them often experience anxiety and depression – a tendency perhaps explained about the lack of effective treatments for their physical symptoms.

“Because IBS patients have higher prevalence of somatic comorbidities such as fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome, identifying and treating these disorders can improve their quality of life,” said lead researcher Zahid Ijaz Tarar, MD, a fellow in the division of gastroenterology and hepatology at the University of Missouri School of Medicine.

“Earlier identification of comorbidities is valuable to inform treatment strategies, including consulting other specialties such as rheumatology and psychiatry to improve the overall health outcomes in IBS patients.”

In addition to fibromyalgia, the research team found that hospitalized IBS patients were also significantly more likely to be white and female.  Less than one percent (0.42%) had a CFS diagnosis – a small percentage to be sure, but still higher than CFS rates in the general population (0.06%).

The high rates of fibromyalgia and CFS in IBS patients has led to speculation that poor diets or antibiotics may cause an imbalance of “bad” bacteria in the gastrointestinal system, allowing toxins to leak into the bloodstream and cause other health problems.

A recent study found that Klebsiella aerogenes, a bacterium that causes white blood cells to produce excess amounts of histamine, can trigger a painful immune system response.

Another study found that women with fibromyalgia have strikingly different types and amounts of bacteria than those without fibromyalgia. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, a “good” bacterium that is normally abundant in the human gut, was found to be depleted in fibromyalgia patients. Other bacteria associated with IBS, CFS and interstitial cystitis were found to be abundant in fibromyalgia patients, but not in the healthy control group.  

New Covid Variant Leading Surge in Respiratory Illness

By Julie Appleby, KFF Health News

It’s winter, that cozy season that brings crackling fireplaces, indoor gatherings — and a wave of respiratory illness. Nearly four years since the pandemic emerged, people are growing weary of dealing with it, but the virus is not done with us.

Nationally, a sharp uptick in emergency room visits and hospitalizations for covid-19, influenza, and respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV, began in mid-December and appears to be gaining momentum.

Here are a few things to know this time around:

What’s Circulating Now?

The covid virus is continually changing, and a recent version is rapidly climbing the charts. Even though it appeared only in September, the variant known as JN.1, a descendant of omicron, is rapidly spreading, representing between 39% to half of the cases, according to pre-holiday stats from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Lab data indicates that the updated vaccines, as well as existing covid rapid tests and medical treatments, are effective with this latest iteration. More good news is that it “does not appear to pose additional risks to public health beyond that of other recent variants,” according to the CDC.

Even so, new covid hospitalizations — 34,798 for the week that ended Dec. 30 — are trending upward, although rates are still substantially lower than last December’s tally. It’s early in the season, though. Levels of virus in wastewater — one indicator of how infections are spreading — are “very high,” exceeding the levels seen this time last year.

And don’t forget, other nasty bugs are going around. More than 20,000 people were hospitalized for influenza the week ending Dec. 30, and the CDC reports that RSV remains elevated in many areas.

“The numbers so far are definitely going in the not-so-good direction,” said Ziyad Al-Aly, the chief of the research and development service at the Veterans Affairs St. Louis Healthcare System and a clinical epidemiologist at Washington University in St. Louis. “We’re likely to see a big uptick in January now that everyone is back home from the holidays.”

Milder Cases and Fewer Deaths

Certainly, compared with the first covid winter, things are better now. Far fewer people are dying or becoming seriously ill, with vaccines and prior infections providing some immunity and reducing severity of illness.

Even compared with last winter, when omicron was surging, the situation is better. New hospitalizations, for example, are about one-third of what they were around the 2022 holidays. Weekly deaths dropped slightly the last week of December to 839 and are also substantially below levels from a year ago.

“The ratio of mild disease to serious clearly has changed,” said William Schaffner, a professor of medicine in the division of infectious diseases at Vanderbilt University School of Medicine in Nashville, Tennessee.

Even so, the definition of “mild” is broad, basically referring to anything short of being sick enough to be hospitalized.

While some patients may have no more than the sniffles, others experiencing “mild” covid can be “miserable for three to five days,” Schaffner said.

How Will This Affect My Day-to-Day Life?

“Am I going to be really sick? Do I have to mask up again?” It is important to know the basics.

For starters, symptoms of the covid variants currently circulating will likely be familiar — such as a runny nose, sore throat, cough, fatigue, fever, and muscle aches.

So if you feel ill, stay home, said Marcus Plescia, chief medical officer of the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials. “It can make a big difference.”

Dust off those at-home covid test kits, check the extended expiration dates on the FDA website, and throw away the ones that have aged out. Tests can be bought at most pharmacies and, if you haven’t ordered yours yet, free test kits are still available through a federal program at covid.gov.

Test more than once, especially if your symptoms are mild. The at-home rapid tests may not detect covid infection in the first couple of days, according to the FDA, which recommends using “multiple tests over a certain time period, such as two to three days.”

With all three viruses, those most at risk include the very young, older adults, pregnant people, and those with compromised immune systems or underlying diseases, including cancer or heart problems. But those without high-risk factors can also be adversely affected.

While mask-wearing has dropped in most places, you may start to see more people wearing them in public spaces, including stores, public transit or entertainment venues.

Although a federal mask mandate is unlikely, health officials and hospitals in at least four states — California, Illinois, Massachusetts, and New York — have again told staff and patients to don masks. Such requirements were loosened last year when the public health emergency officially ended.

Such policies are advanced through county-level directives. The CDC data indicates that, nationally, about 46.7% of counties are seeing moderate to high hospital admission rates of covid.

“We are not going to see widespread mask mandates as our population will not find that acceptable,” Schaffner noted. “That said, on an individual basis, mask-wearing is a very intelligent and reasonable thing to do as an additional layer of protection.”

The N95, KN95, and KF94 masks are the most protective. Cloth and paper are not as effective.

And, finally, if you haven’t yet been vaccinated with an updated covid vaccine or gotten a flu shot, it’s not too late. There are also new vaccines and monoclonal antibodies to protect against RSV recommended for certain populations, which include older adults, pregnant people, and young children.

Generally, flu peaks in midwinter and runs into spring. Covid, while not technically seasonal, has higher rates in winter as people crowd together indoors.

“If you haven’t received vaccines,” Schaffner said, “we urge you to get them and don’t linger.”

Repeat Infections

People who have dodged covid entirely are in the minority.

At the same time, repeat infections are common. Fifteen percent of respondents to a recent Yahoo News/YouGov poll said they’d had covid two or three times. A Canadian survey released in December found 1 in 5 residents said they had gotten covid more than once as of last June.

Aside from the drag of being sick and missing work or school for days, debate continues over whether repeat infections pose smaller or larger risks of serious health effects. There are no definitive answers, although experts continue to study the issue.

Two research efforts suggest repeat infections may increase a person’s chances of developing serious illness or even long covid — which is defined various ways but generally means having one or more effects lingering for a month or more following infection. The precise percentage of cases — and underlying factors — of long covid and why people get it are among the many unanswered questions about the condition. However, there is a growing consensus among researchers that vaccination is protective.

Still, the VA’s Al-Aly said a study he co-authored that was published in November 2022 found that getting covid more than once raises an “additional risk of problems in the acute phase, be it hospitalization or even dying,” and makes a person two times as likely to experience long covid symptoms.

The Canadian survey also found a higher risk of long covid among those who self-reported two or more infections. Both studies have their limitations: Most of the 6 million in the VA database were male and older, and the data studied came from the first two years of the pandemic, so some of it reflected illnesses from before vaccines became available. The Canadian survey, although more recent, relied on self-reporting of infections and conditions, which may not be accurate.

Still, Al-Aly and other experts say taking preventive steps, such as getting vaccinated and wearing a mask in higher-risk situations, can hedge your bets.

“Even if in a prior infection you dodged the bullet of long covid,” Al-Aly said, “it doesn’t’ mean you will dodge the bullet every single time.”

KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues.

Stopping Long-Term Use of Benzodiazepines Increases Risk of Death

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Abruptly stopping long-term treatment with benzodiazepines nearly doubles the risk of a patient dying within a year, according to a large new study.

Benzodiazepines such as Valium and Xanax have long been used to treat anxiety, insomnia and seizures, but their coprescribing with opioids is controversial because both drugs cause respiratory depression, increasing the risk of an overdose.

In 2016, the CDC warned doctors to avoid coprescribing opioids and benzodiazepines “whenever possible.” That same year, the FDA warned that taking the drugs concurrently has serious risks, including “profound sedation, respiratory depression, coma and death.”

Those warnings led many prescribers to abruptly take their patients off benzodiazepines, which many used safely for years. Some patients took opioids and benzodiazepines with a muscle relaxant, a combination known as the “Holy Trinity.”  

Researchers at the University of Michigan analyzed the insurance claims of over 350,000 adults prescribed benzodiazepines long-term from 2013 to 2019, expecting to find the FDA and CDC warnings validated. To their surprise, the risk of death from suicide, accidents and other causes rose for patients in the 12 months after benzodiazepines were discontinued.

“These results were unexpected,” researchers reported in JAMA Network Open. “Given the increased OD (overdose) risk and mortality associated with benzodiazepine prescribing, particularly when coprescribed with opioids, we anticipated that discontinuing benzodiazepine prescriptions would be associated with a lower mortality risk.

“However, for every outcome examined in this analysis, discontinuation was associated with some degree of increased risk — at odds with the assumption underlying ongoing policy efforts that reducing benzodiazepine prescribing to long-term users will decrease harms.”

Researchers found that patients on opioids who stopped taking benzodiazepines had a 6.3% risk of dying over the next year, compared to 3.9% of those who continued taking both drugs. Patients who were discontinued also had a slightly higher risk of a nonfatal overdose, suicidal thoughts, and emergency department visits.

Risk of Death for Opioid Patients Taken Off Benzodiazepines

JAMA NETWORK OPEN

"I think it is important to revisit the assumption that tapering stable long-term users should be the default and instead, perhaps, focus on those with clearly elevated risk of harms," lead author Donovan Maust, MD, a geriatric psychiatrist at UM Health, told MedPage Today.

Maust and his colleagues say patients discontinued from benzodiazepines could be suffering the effects of withdrawal or may be turning to other substances such as cannabis or alcohol. Given the risks involved, they urge prescribers to be “judicious” when prescribing benzodiazepines for the first time and to carefully limit their long-term use.

Older Americans Feel Trapped in Medicare Advantage Plans

By Sarah Jane Tribble, KFF Health News  

In 2016, Richard Timmins went to a free informational seminar to learn more about Medicare coverage.

“I listened to the insurance agent and, basically, he really promoted Medicare Advantage,” Timmins said. The agent described less expensive and broader coverage offered by the plans, which are funded largely by the government but administered by private insurance companies.

For Timmins, who is now 76, it made economic sense then to sign up. And his decision was great, for a while.

Then, three years ago, he noticed a lesion on his right earlobe.

“I have a family history of melanoma. And so, I was kind of tuned in to that and thinking about that,” Timmins said of the growth, which doctors later diagnosed as malignant melanoma. “It started to grow and started to become rather painful.”

Timmins, though, discovered that his enrollment in a Premera Blue Cross Medicare Advantage plan would mean a limited network of doctors and the potential need for preapproval, or prior authorization, from the insurer before getting care. The experience, he said, made getting care more difficult, and now he wants to switch back to traditional, government-administered Medicare.

But he can’t. And he’s not alone.

RICHARD TIMMINS

“I have very little control over my actual medical care,” he said, adding that he now advises friends not to sign up for the private plans. “I think that people are not understanding what Medicare Advantage is all about.”

Low Premiums and Extra Benefits

Enrollment in Medicare Advantage plans has grown substantially in the past few decades, enticing more than half of all eligible people, primarily those 65 or older, with low premium costs and perks like dental and vision insurance. And as the private plans’ share of the Medicare patient pie has ballooned to 30.8 million people, so too have concerns about the insurers’ aggressive sales tactics and misleading coverage claims.

Enrollees, like Timmins, who sign on when they are healthy can find themselves trapped as they grow older and sicker.

“It’s one of those things that people might like them on the front end because of their low to zero premiums and if they are getting a couple of these extra benefits — the vision, dental, that kind of thing,” said Christine Huberty, a lead benefit specialist supervising attorney for the Greater Wisconsin Agency on Aging Resources.

“But it’s when they actually need to use it for these bigger issues,” Huberty said, “that’s when people realize, ‘Oh no, this isn’t going to help me at all.’”

Medicare pays private insurers a fixed amount per Medicare Advantage enrollee and in many cases also pays out bonuses, which the insurers can use to provide supplemental benefits. Huberty said those extra benefits work as an incentive to “get people to join the plan” but that the plans then “restrict the access to so many services and coverage for the bigger stuff.”

Switching Plans

David Meyers, assistant professor of health services, policy, and practice at the Brown University School of Public Health, analyzed a decade of Medicare Advantage enrollment and found that about 50% of beneficiaries — rural and urban — left their contract by the end of five years. Most of those enrollees switched to another Medicare Advantage plan rather than traditional Medicare.

In the study, Meyers and his co-authors muse that switching plans could be a positive sign of a free marketplace but that it could also signal “unmeasured discontent” with Medicare Advantage.

“The problem is that once you get into Medicare Advantage, if you have a couple of chronic conditions and you want to leave Medicare Advantage, even if Medicare Advantage isn’t meeting your needs, you might not have any ability to switch back to traditional Medicare,” Meyers said.

Traditional Medicare can be too expensive for beneficiaries switching back from Medicare Advantage, he said. In traditional Medicare, enrollees pay a monthly premium and, after reaching a deductible, in most cases are expected to pay 20% of the cost of each nonhospital service or item they use. And there is no limit on how much an enrollee may have to pay as part of that 20% coinsurance if they end up using a lot of care, Meyers said.

To limit what they spend out-of-pocket, traditional Medicare enrollees typically sign up for supplemental insurance, such as employer coverage or a private Medigap policy. If they are low-income, Medicaid may provide that supplemental coverage.

But, Meyers said, there’s a catch: While beneficiaries who enrolled first in traditional Medicare are guaranteed to qualify for a Medigap policy without pricing based on their medical history, Medigap insurers can deny coverage to beneficiaries transferring from Medicare Advantage plans or base their prices on medical underwriting.

Only four states — Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, and New York — prohibit insurers from denying a Medigap policy if the enrollee has preexisting conditions such as diabetes or heart disease.

Paul Ginsburg is a former commissioner on the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, also known as MedPAC. It’s a legislative branch agency that advises Congress on the Medicare program. He said the inability of enrollees to easily switch between Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare during open enrollment periods is “a real concern in our system; it shouldn’t be that way.”

The federal government offers specific enrollment periods every year for switching plans. During Medicare’s open enrollment period, from Oct. 15 to Dec. 7, enrollees can switch out of their private plans to traditional, government-administered Medicare.

Medicare Advantage enrollees can also switch plans or transfer to traditional Medicare during another open enrollment period, from Jan. 1 to March 31.

“There are a lot of people that say, ‘Hey, I’d love to come back, but I can’t get Medigap anymore, or I’ll have to just pay a lot more,’” said Ginsburg, who is now a professor of health policy at the University of Southern California.

Timmins is one of those people. The retired veterinarian lives in a rural community on Whidbey Island just north of Seattle. It’s a rugged, idyllic landscape and a popular place for second homes, hiking, and the arts. But it’s also a bit remote.

While it’s typically harder to find doctors in rural areas, Timmins said he believes his Premera Blue Cross plan made it more challenging to get care for a variety of reasons, including the difficulty of finding and getting in to see specialists.

Nearly half of Medicare Advantage plan directories contained inaccurate information on what providers were available, according to the most recent federal review. Beginning in 2024, new or expanding Medicare Advantage plans must demonstrate compliance with federal network expectations or their applications could be denied.

Amanda Lansford, a Premera Blue Cross spokesperson, declined to comment on Timmins’ case. She said the plan meets federal network adequacy requirements as well as travel time and distance standards “to ensure members are not experiencing undue burdens when seeking care.”

Traditional Medicare allows beneficiaries to go to nearly any doctor or hospital in the U.S., and in most cases enrollees do not need approval to get services.

Timmins, who recently finished immunotherapy, said he doesn’t think he would be approved for a Medigap policy, “because of my health issue.” And if he were to get into one, Timmins said, it would likely be too expensive. For now, Timmins said, he is staying with his Medicare Advantage plan.

“I’m getting older. More stuff is going to happen.”

There is also a chance, Timmins said, that his cancer could resurface: “I’m very aware of my mortality.”

KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues.

New Physical Therapy Helps Older Adults with Chronic Low Back Pain

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Older adults suffering from chronic low back pain experienced faster pain relief after getting a new type of physical therapy focused on strengthening their hip muscles, according to a new study.

The study findings, recently reported in The Lancet Rheumatology, are notable given the limited research on back pain therapies for older adults.

“Unfortunately, the societal attitude is that older people don’t warrant the same level of care that younger people do when it comes to musculoskeletal problems,” lead author Gregory Hicks, PhD, Distinguished Professor of Health Sciences at the University of Delaware, said in a press release.

“When I started this work, there were a lot of naysayers. I’d tell them, ‘Read the literature — why are we excluding older adults from low back pain research?’ We all hope to get older. Why ignore a place in time where we all hope to end up?”

Hicks and his colleagues enrolled 184 people aged 60 or older who reported moderate low back pain, hip pain, and muscle weakness for at least 6 months. Patients were randomly assigned to a hip-focused physical therapy known as Manual Therapy and Strengthening the Hip (MASH) or a more traditional physical therapy for back pain that focused on the spine. Both groups received therapy for eight weeks at the University of Delaware, Duke University or the University of Pittsburgh.

Researchers found that participants who received the MASH therapy had more pain relief after eight weeks than those who had spine-focused therapy. They also showed more improvement in walking endurance and in their ability to rise from a seated position. However, after six months, both groups showed similar levels of improvement.

Previous research by Hicks, funded by the National Institutes of Health, has studied the impact of hip impairment, vitamin D deficiency, and trunk muscle composition in older patients with low back pain. He learned that there were distinct sub-groups of patients with back pain who had unique characteristics and treatment needs.

“It’s becoming quite clear, if you make the assumption that all low back pain is the same, you’re wrong,” said Hicks. “If you can identify sub-groups of low back pain patients with similar traits, you can develop matched treatments, which hopefully lead to better outcomes.”

Low back pain is the leading cause of disability worldwide. According to a recent Harris Poll, nearly 3 out of 10 U.S. adults currently suffer from chronic low back pain, surpassing the number of Americans who have arthritis, diabetes or heart disease. On average, the typical back pain sufferer has sought relief from at least three healthcare providers, with many treatments such as epidural steroid injections proving ineffective.   

The Emergency Room Quandary

By Carol Levy, PNN Columnist

I went to the ER only once because my pain was so out of control. The nurses and the doctor were nice, but mostly I was ignored. After waiting what seemed like hours, a nurse came to my bedside with a needle.

"Hold out your arm," she said and injected me with... something. She didn't say what it was.

The pain was so overwhelming, I didn't ask. Whatever it was, it did nothing, not even make me drowsy.

They kept me there for a few more hours, offering nothing after the injection but a cursory, "Sorry it didn't help you" and "Maybe rest will help."

After another hour or so, I left. They were of no help. They could be of no help.

I used to work as an emergency room ward clerk, the first person people saw when they came in. I would run back to get a doctor or nurse if a patient had one of three complaints: chest pain, symptoms of a kidney stone, or a migraine. Those patients were immediately taken to an exam room.

All the other patients I signed in, then directed them to the waiting room. “Please have a seat and wait for your name to be called,” I’d tell them.

Often, they would sit for hours watching as others who came in were immediately taken to the exam room. I had to repeatedly explain that other patients' complaints were more serious and they had to be seen first.

Some of those waiting patients became angry. They had no clue how many patients were already in the exam rooms, or if the doctors and nurses were dealing with critically injured patients from auto accidents or others with serious health issues.

The ones who came in with complaints of “I have a cold” or “I hurt my finger 3 weeks ago” went to the bottom of the list. So too did those whose main complaint — such as chronic pain — was not of immediate concern. It may have seemed like an emergency to them, but to the ER staff it often isn't. An emergency room can never operate on a first come, first serve basis.

Often, as chronic pain sufferers, we have trouble finding doctors or pain management specialists who are willing to take us as patients. Without a doctor we are vulnerable. When the pain gets too bad or feels uncontrollable, our only alternative may be the ER.

The problem with that is the emergency room is not going to help us much, if at all. They don't know our history. They don't know us. When a patient says they don’t have a doctor and insists on getting opioid pain medication, they immediately become suspect. They might be an addict trying to cadge an opioid.

We are so mired in the “opioid crisis” that it blinds us to the other issues that are harming us. We need to look at all the issues that make us vulnerable. Being able to find a doctor should be high on the list of what we need to fight for.

Carol Jay Levy has lived with trigeminal neuralgia, a chronic facial pain disorder, for over 30 years. She is the author of “A Pained Life, A Chronic Pain Journey.”  Carol is the moderator of the Facebook support group “Women in Pain Awareness.” Her blog “The Pained Life” can be found here.

Fascia: An Overlooked Cause of Chronic Pain

By Dr. Adam Taylor, Lancaster University

We are constantly reminded about how exercise benefits our bone and muscle health or reduces fat. However, there is also a growing interest in one element of our anatomy that is often overlooked: our fascia.

Fascia is a thin casing of connective tissue, mainly made of collagen – a rope-like structure that provides strength and protection to many areas of the body. It surrounds and holds every organ, blood vessel, bone, nerve fibre and muscle in place. And scientists increasingly recognise its importance in muscle and bone health.

It is hard to see fascia in the body, but you can get a sense of what it looks like if you look at a steak. It is the thin white streaks on the surface or between layers of the meat.

Fascia provides general and special functions in the body, and is arranged in several ways. The closest to the surface is the superficial fascia, which is underneath the skin between layers of fat. Then we have the deep fascia that covers the muscles, bones and blood vessels.

The link between fascia, muscle and bone health and function is reinforced by recent studies that show the important role fascia has in helping the muscles work, by assisting the contraction of the muscle cells to generate force and affecting muscle stiffness.

Each muscle is wrapped in fascia. These layers are important as they enable muscles that sit next to, or on top of, each other to move freely without affecting each other’s functions.

Fascia also assists in the transition of force through the musculoskeletal system. An example of this is our ankle, where the achilles tendon transfers force into the plantar fascia. This sees forces moving vertically down through the achilles and then transferred horizontally into the bottom of the foot - the plantar fascia – when moving.

Similar force transition is seen from muscles in the chest running down through to groups of muscles in the forearm. There are similar fascia connective chains through other areas of the body.

When Fascia Gets Damaged

When fascia doesn’t function properly, such as after injury, the layers become less able to facilitate movement over each other or help transfer force. Injury to fascia takes a long time to repair, probably because it possesses similar cells to tendons (fibroblasts), and has a limited blood supply.

Recently, fascia, particularly the layers close to the surface, have been shown to have the second-highest number of nerves after the skin. The fascial linings of muscles have also been linked to pain from surgery to musculoskeletal injuries from sports, exercise and ageing. Up to 30% of people with musculoskeletal pain may have fascial involvement or fascia may be the cause.

A type of massage called fascial manipulation, developed by Italian physiotherapist Luigi Stecco in the 1980s, has been shown to improve the pain from patellar tendinopathy (pain in the tendon below the kneecap), both in the short and long term.

Fascial manipulation has also shown positive results in treating chronic shoulder pain.

One of the growing trends for helping with musculoskeletal injuries is Kinesio tape, which is often used in professional sports, although evidence for its effectiveness is mixed. It is also being used to complement the function of the fascia, and is used to treat chronic lower back pain where fascial involvement is a factor.

Fascia in Disease

Aside from getting damaged, fascia can also provide paths that infections can travel along, within muscles.

The spaces between fascial layers are usually closed (think of cling film being folded over), but when an infection occurs, germs can spread between these layers. This is a particular problem in the neck, where there are several layers of fascia for infections to travel along. In severe cases, surgery is often needed to remove the dead tissue and save the healthy remaining tissue.

One of the primary examples of fascia functioning in health, and the challenges its dysfunction can bring, is seen in the common complaint plantar fasciitis, which causes pain on around the heel and arch of the foot.

This incredibly common ailment affects 5-7% of people, rising to 22% in athletes. It is recognised as an overuse injury, causing the thickening of the fascial bands on the soles of the feet that help give the arch support.

Fascia can also be implicated in more serious health conditions, such as necrotising fasciitis. This is a rare but serious bacterial condition that can spread through the body quickly and cause death.

The condition is almost always caused by bacteria, specifically group A Streptococcus or Staphylococcus aureus. The initial infection comes from a cut or scratch, and then the bacteria travel along the fascia to other areas away from the initial site of access and multiply in the ideal environment afforded by the warm recesses of the body.

One reason fascia has been overlooked in health and disease is because it was difficult to see using current imaging technology. More recently, though, MRI and ultrasound imaging have been shown to be beneficial in visualising fascia, particularly in musculoskeletal conditions such as plantar fasciitis, and pathological changes in the fascia of the shoulder and neck.

With the growing interest in fascia and the growing understanding of its contribution to musculoskeletal health, it’s sensible to suggest that we look after it in the same way we do with the rest of the musculoskeletal system - by using it. Simple techniques like foam rollers and stretching are beneficial in increasing mobility, but there is still much to learn about our fascia and the role it plays in our day-to-day health.

Adam Taylor, PhD, is a Professor and Director of the Clinical Anatomy Learning Centre at Lancaster University. His research interests lie within the field of osteoarthritis and the degeneration of cartilage and bone.

This article originally appeared in The Conversation and is republished with permission.

What Money Can’t Buy

By Mia Maysack, PNN Columnist

Just about everyone I've encountered has commented on their lack of cheer over the holiday season. I can relate to that in my own way, but also think we put too much pressure on ourselves to be appropriately cheerful when the calendar tells us to be.

I have been disheartened by the fact society presents the holidays as a joyous time, when they really seem to be more of an excuse to spend more than we should and consume more than we need.

This often results in people being rude in stores or driving recklessly, as if their lives are more important than anyone else's. We fixate on what we want or lack -- as opposed to what others may need. The holiday spirit should be less about us and more about what we can do for others.

Some of us are without our loved ones-- not just during the holidays, but literally every day. In the very house or apartment next to yours, there could be someone silently suffering. On our own streets, people are homeless or starving as we rush by them, too busy to care. On the other side of the world, there are innocent people effectively being wiped out via genocide.

I think it's absolutely okay that we are not all that jolly. In fact, if we were, there would be something extraordinarily wrong with that. This isn't to belittle anyone feeling joyful, it's solely a matter of keeping things in perspective.

Please take time in the new year to enjoy this opportunity to love yourself and appreciate those around you. If you are working, understand that your job is the dream of the unemployed. Reflect on what you've made it through and accomplished -- even if all you managed to do was live another year and survive.

Do something small to lift yourself up -- whether its fresh air, listening to music, making a tasty dish, or volunteering or donating in a meaningful way for another person.

There will come a day when the only things you long for are those that money can’t buy. There will be times when you'd give anything to revisit the past that came and went so quickly.

The only item on our holiday wish lists should be more time – time to optimally utilize the gifts we already have and to make the most of life while we still can.

Sending prayers to all of you for a safe, healthy and gentle 2024.

Mia Maysack lives with chronic migraine, cluster headache and fibromyalgia. She is a healthcare reform advocate and founder of Keepin’ Our Heads Up, a support network; Peace & Love, a life coaching practice; and Still We Rise, an organization that seeks to alleviate pain of all kinds.

DEA Finalizes More Cuts in Rx Opioid Supply in 2024

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration will further reduce the supply of codeine, morphine, oxycodone and other prescription opioids in 2024, ignoring complaints from thousands of patients that opioid pain medication is already difficult to obtain and many pharmacies are out of stock.

In a notice pre-published Friday in the Federal Register, the DEA said it would stick with plans to cut aggregate production quotas (APQs) for prescription opioids for the eighth consecutive year, reducing the supply to levels not seen in nearly a decade.

“After considering all of the relevant factors, DEA has determined that the APQs of prescription opioids should be reduced from calendar year 2023 APQ levels and they are sufficient to meet the forecasted domestic and foreign medical needs,” the DEA said.

Under the Controlled Substances Act, the DEA has broad legal authority to set APQs annually for hundreds of Schedule I and II chemicals and medications – in effect telling drug manufacturers how much they can make each year.

Acting on the advice of the Food and Drug Administration, which estimates there will be a be a 7.9% decline in medical need for opioids next year, the DEA in early November published its proposed APQs for 2024 in the Federal Register and invited public comment.      

Nearly 4,700 comments came in, mostly from pain patients worried that further cuts in the opioid supply would worsen shortages and interfere with their treatment.  

“I am pretty much bed bound. A couple of weeks ago I tried taking my life,” one patient wrote. “No one should have to suffer like this. These are medications that work. And why is it that the prescriptions have gone down but overdoses have gone up?”

“Please do not cut the Rx opioid production amount anymore. There is a severe shortage and many people who have prescriptions cannot get them filled at a pharmacy,” another poster said.

The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) has been warning about shortages of hydrocodone and oxycodone for months, but those shortages have yet to be recognized by the FDA or DEA.  If any shortages exist, DEA said they were out of its control and blamed the “temporary lack of inventory” on drug manufacturers.

“DEA utilizes the available, reliable data and information received by the agency at the time APQs are proposed and proactively monitors drug production, distribution and supply during the year. However, drug shortages may occur subsequently due to factors outside of DEA control such as manufacturing and quality problems, processing delays, supply chain disruptions, or discontinuations,” the agency said.

“Manufacturers’ business practices may… potentially contribute to a temporary lack of inventory of controlled substances at the point of dispensation. In recent years, this has included labor shortages and a lack of production capacity.”

The DEA’s final order reduces the supply of codeine year-to-year by 8.3 percent, followed by morphine (4.3%), hydromorphone (2.1%), hydrocodone (0.35%) and oxycodone (0.34%). Since 2015, APQs for most opioids have been cut by over two-thirds.

DEA admits that its “reliable data” on drug production may not be all that reliable. The agency said there was a “lack of real-time data and gaps in its understanding of production lead times,” which weaken its ability to respond to drug shortages. As a result, it was seeking more up to date information from manufacturers on their drug sales and inventory.

Late Notice to Drug Makers

The production quotas for 2024 won’t be officially published in the Federal Register until Wednesday, January 3rd – which is about a month overdue and gives little time for drug manufacturers to prepare for the coming year. That appears to be a violation of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), which stipulates that APQs be established by the U.S. Attorney General – who the DEA reports to -- “on or before December 1 of each year.”  

(Update: In a 1/4/24 email to PNN, the DEA confirmed that drug makers were only now being notified of their quota allotments for 2024. “DEA registrants cannot receive notification of their individual quotas until the final APQ notice is signed and published in the FR (Federal Register) per the CSA,” the email said. There was no explanation for the late publication of the final APQ.)   

Another concern for drug makers besides the late notice is a DEA plan to set production quotas for each company on a quarterly basis, instead of annually. A Pfizer representative expressed strong reservations about that, saying it could hamstring drug production and worsen shortages of injectable drugs used in anesthesia, which have been in short supply for years.  

“DEA’s proposal to allocate quota on a quarterly basis will make manufacturing lead times, planning schedules, and resource allocation extremely difficult if not untenable,” Jennifer Walton, Senior Vice President at Pfizer, wrote in a letter to the agency.

“As an example, from the time API (active pharmaceutical ingredient) is received at a manufacturing plant to the time finished product is ready for shipment, the lead time can be as long as six months, stretching over multiple quarters. Given those time frames, DEA’s proposed quarterly quota grants will likely result in interruptions in supply of sterile injectable products used in the inpatient setting.”  

Evidence Should Be Updated for Covid-19 Treatment

By Dr. Lynora Saxinger, Undark Magazine

Strong science, particularly vaccine development, helped us steer our way through the Covid-19 pandemic. Now, as the pandemic recedes, it’s time to hold drug companies accountable for the treatments they’ve developed.

The evidence for these medications has not kept pace with major changes in the nature of the Covid-19 pandemic, and updated studies should be required to maintain approval for these very profitable drugs.

The Covid-19 drug development battlefield is littered with 479 failed or inactive drugs, while 358 are still in clinical or preclinical trials, according to a tracker maintained by the Biotechnology Innovation Organization, a trade group.

The only oral Covid-19 therapy approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that is recommended for first line outpatient use is Pfizer’s Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir), a two-drug combination that stops the SARS-CoV-2 virus from replicating in the body.

Hailed as a game changer, Paxlovid is a very good antiviral drug that has saved many lives, and its incredibly rapid development was a feat of science.

The major study leading to its approval, called the EPIC-HR trial, showed that it reduced the risk of hospitalization and death by an impressive 89 percent in high-risk, unvaccinated people.

But there is a lack of high-quality research on how Paxlovid affects outcomes beyond severe Covid — such as duration of illness, how the drug affects transmission, and whether it prevents long Covid. Nevertheless, some physicians are promoting the drug for these uses based on weak, inconsistent data.

pfizer image

The stakes are high: If we fail to set a requirement for well-designed studies of Paxlovid’s impact on all concerns besides hospitalization and death, we will be setting up a slow-moving, disastrous recreation of mistakes made with drugs for other diseases such as influenza.

Early in the Covid-19 pandemic, the explosive, unorganized growth of clinical trials for treatments was intended to save lives from this fearsome new disease. But many trials were small and of low quality, with a few exceptional trials providing much of our good data. In that initial desperate push for Covid-19 treatments, experimental, everything-but-the-kitchen-sink approaches became widely used.

Ivermectin Controversy

The case of ivermectin is instructive: This antiparasitic drug was used in tremendous volumes based on poor quality and sometimes outright fraudulent data, despite advice against its use from the FDA and in formal treatment guidelines. Social media amplification of the increasingly dubious evidence base led to a near-delusional belief in its benefit — and impressive profits for some opportunistic doctors.

A few well-coordinated and well-designed trials up front would have shortened the controversy, saved costs, and avoided duplicated effort of smaller low-quality trials. Most importantly, showing it to be ineffective earlier may have prevented the ensuing social media crusade, perhaps allowing some high-risk people to accept evidence-supported treatments like Paxlovid and the intravenous antiviral remdesivir rather than requesting, or even suing hospitals, to administer ivermectin.

Covid-19’s infection outcomes changed unusually rapidly across waves of the pandemic, which meant that studies could be outdated in months if they did not reflect the current viral strains and population immune responses. Data collection in the EPIC-HR study, which still guides treatment with Paxlovid, took place in 2021 when hospitalization rates were high, many were unvaccinated (including all trial participants), the viral strains were different than today, and the main outcome of interest in many communities was “flattening the curve,” or preventing hospitalization.

Now, almost everyone has been vaccinated, infected, or both. In a recent study, 96.4 percent of U.S. blood donors had Covid-19 antibodies by September 2022. The overall risk of hospitalization and death has also decreased significantly.

A Different Disease

Essentially, we are now dealing with a different disease. We are more focused on outcomes such as time lost from work, transmission risk, and long Covid risk. Yet there is almost no direct evidence about Paxlovid’s effect on these outcomes.

Paxlovid was approved for the treatment of mild to moderate Covid-19 in adults at high risk of developing severe disease. However, physicians and pharmacists have told me, it is increasingly being prescribed off-label for lower risk patients. This contention is supported by a recent U.S.-based preprint showing that 42 percent of more than 111,000 Paxlovid recipients had no major medical comorbidities, with treatment eligibility defined by having at least one risk factor for severe Covid-19.

Some physicians are extrapolating from hamster studies and lab data to suggest it reduces Covid-19 transmission. And they’re prescribing it to reduce long Covid risk based on very weak studies that analyzed administrative databases for Covid-19 complications rather than tracking long Covid symptoms in treated and untreated patients.

This matters because Paxlovid treatment for people who are not high risk has not shown significant benefit. One still unpublished randomized trial of lower-risk patients was terminated because low rates of hospitalization overall (in treated and untreated people) made it impossible to see a benefit.

Even in higher-risk groups, a recent meta-analysis of observational studies has shown very little absolute reduction of mortality, and no benefit in such patients under age 60. At the same time, people taking Paxlovid face possible side effects, drug interactions, and volatile drug pricing. They do not know if Paxlovid is worth all of that. They don’t know if the drug will reduce transmission to others, if they are less likely to get severely ill, if they will need time off work, or if it will spare them from long Covid.

Tamiflu Questions

Infectious diseases specialists like myself are experiencing an alarming sense of déjà vu. Tamiflu (oseltamivir), a treatment for influenza, was licensed in 1999 with data showing a modest benefit in reducing illness by one day. The reviewers noted that a “more definitive demonstration of clinical or public health relevance” would require additional data.

But 24 years later, we are not farther ahead — important questions about Tamiflu remain unanswered, with longstanding debates about the benefit of the drug and a false advertising lawsuit that went on for nearly 10 years before being dropped in July. The guidelines for the use of Tamiflu in influenza vary tremendously because of varied interpretation of a poor evidence base, and newer studies call its use as an influenza treatment into question. Even so, in its first 15 years on the market, Tamiflu made $18 billion in sales.

It is hard to stop a prescribing practice once it has become the norm, despite inadequate data. This is a recognized driver of cost increases in health care.

Pharmaceutical companies play a pivotal role in the research and development of effective therapies, and their lifesaving contributions during the Covid-19 pandemic have been commendable. However, the major investments these companies make in R&D should not give them free rein to market high-cost, high-volume drugs of public health importance without continued scrutiny of their effectiveness if the initial registration studies no longer stand because of changes in the disease.

Some bold, novel options could help address this gap in evidence. In exceptional circumstances (such as pandemics), pharmaceutical companies could be required to conduct studies to reassess a drug’s effectiveness after it has entered the market if conditions have meaningfully changed since the initial trials.

Another option could require companies to put a small portion of drug profits towards funding well-designed, independent trials so that crucial, commercially successful drugs would be part of ongoing studies. The FDA and other agencies should judiciously require and support such studies that could help guide treatment decisions, while balancing the need to support appropriate research and new drug development.

The medical community has responsibility, too: Professional societies that draft treatment guidelines must take a more consistently assertive stance in advising against uses for which there is insufficient evidence, rather than leaving it open to prescriber judgment. Both prescribers and potential patients need to accept and use evidence to help sustain health care systems, and lobby for changes needed to define the best treatments for people with Covid-19.

We are at a unique juncture in the fight against Covid-19, as fear gives way to complacency — and the path forward is scientific rigor. Failing to mandate high-quality evidence for treatment choices may lead us back down the path of inadequately researched treatments, opinion-driven guidelines, and wasted resources.

Pfizer has raked in about $20 billion dollars in revenue from Paxlovid alone over the last two years. This sum is nearly half of the National Institutes of Health’s entire budget for 2022. It is not surprising that the company has not voluntarily started additional trials after approval based on the stellar results in that first, now-irrelevant trial.

In the wake of the pandemic, we have an opportunity to improve both what we are doing, and how we may address research challenges in a future crisis. Paxlovid’s price is set to increase — from $530 to $1,390 before insurance — next year, but there is no corresponding increase in our knowledge of its value. The cost of this information gap will be very high, for both individuals and health care systems.

Lynora Saxinger, MD, is a journalist, infectious disease physician, and professor at the University of Alberta who headed a Covid evidence synthesis group during the pandemic. She is currently a Fellow in Journalism and Health Impact at the Dalla Lana School for Public Health.

This article was originally published by Undark, a non-profit, editorially independent online magazine covering the complicated and often fractious intersection of science and society. You can read the original article here.