CDC: Fentanyl Urgent Public Health Problem

By Pat Anson, Editor

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is finally acknowledging that the U.S. has a fentanyl problem that is growing worse by the day. And that more people are dying in some states from overdoses of illicit fentanyl than from prescription opioids.

“An urgent, collaborative public health and law enforcement response is needed to address the increasing problem of IMF (illicitly manufactured fentanyl) and fentanyl deaths,” CDC researcher Matthew Gladden, PhD, said in the agency’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.  

Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid 50 to 100 times more potent than morphine. It is prescribed legally in patches and lozenges to treat chronic pain, but in recent years there has been a surge in overdoses linked to illicit fentanyl obtained on the black market, where it is often mixed with heroin.

In a new analysis of opioid overdoses in 27 states, the CDC identified eight “high burden” states where fentanyl overdoses sharply increased, even though fentanyl prescriptions were relatively stable.

Those states are Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, Ohio, Florida, Kentucky, Maryland and North Carolina.

In six of the eight states, the CDC said fentanyl was the “primary driver” of synthetic opioid deaths – meaning they outnumbered overdoses from legal synthetic opioids. That is a major concession by the agency, which has long maintained that prescription opioids were primarily responsible for the nation’s so-called opioid epidemic.

The data analyzed was from 2013 and 2014. More recent reports from several states indicate the fentanyl problem has significantly worsened. The DEA recently reported the U.S. is being “inundated” with counterfeit prescription drugs made with fentanyl.  

“This finding coupled with the strong correlation between fentanyl submissions (laboratory tests) and fentanyl-involved overdose deaths observed in Ohio and Florida and supported by this report likely indicate the problem of IMF is rapidly expanding,” Gladden wrote. “Recent (2016) seizures of large numbers of counterfeit pills containing IMF indicate that states where persons commonly use diverted prescription pills, including opioid pain relievers, might begin to experience increases in fentanyl deaths because many counterfeit pills are deceptively sold as and hard to distinguish from diverted opioid pain relievers.”

The CDC hasn’t been completely silent about the fentanyl problem. In October 2015 the agency issued a health advisory to public health departments, healthcare providers and medical examiners to be on the alert for fentanyl overdoses.  Warnings to the public, however, have been scarce as the agency focused instead on controversial guidelines that discourage doctors from prescribing opioids for chronic pain.

Even the U.S. Surgeon General appears to be neglecting the fentanyl problem. This week Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, MD, said he would be sending letters to over two million physicians urging them to follow the CDC guidelines and pledge to safely prescribe opioids. Nowhere in the letter or on a website promoting the “Turn the Tide” campaign is fentanyl even mentioned.  

Critics of opioid prescribing have long maintained that opioid pain medication is often a gateway drug to heroin and other illicit substances, but recent research indicates that is not true.

"Although the majority of current heroin users report having used prescription opioids non-medically before they initiated heroin use, heroin use among people who use prescription opioids for non-medical reasons is rare, and the transition to heroin use appears to occur at a low rate," researchers reported in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Another recent study of military veterans found there was no significant link between heroin use and legally prescribed opioids or chronic pain.

Further compounding the problem is that some heroin and fentanyl deaths are falsely reported as overdoses from opioid pain medication due to inadequate or nonexistent toxicology tests.

Prescribed Opioids Not Linked to Veterans’ Heroin Use

By Pat Anson, Editor

A new study of U.S. military veterans found a strong link between heroin use and the abuse of opioid pain medication, but with an important caveat:  the heroin use was associated with the non-medical use of opioid painkillers.

Having chronic pain was also not found to be a significant risk factor for heroin use.

The ten-year study by researchers at Brown and Yale Universities followed nearly 3,400 veterans at nine Veterans Affairs facilities who were participating in the Veterans Aging Cohort Study (VACS).

Of the 500 veterans who started using heroin during the study, 386 of them also began using prescription painkillers non-medically.

"Our findings demonstrate a pattern of transitioning from non-medical use of prescription opioids to heroin use that has only been demonstrated in select populations," said study co-author David Fiellin, a Yale public health and medical professor and director of the VACS study.

"Our findings are unique in that our sample of individuals consisted of patients who were receiving routine medical care for common medical conditions."

Even after statistically accounting for other risks -- such as race, income, use of other drugs, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression -- researchers found that veterans who began misusing painkillers were 5.4 times more likely to begin using heroin. Other major risk factors for heroin use include being male (2.6 times greater risk) and abusing stimulant drugs (2.1 times greater risk).

Veterans who received a short-term prescription for an opioid medication had a 1.7 times greater risk of starting heroin. But having a long-term prescription for opioids was not found to be a significant risk factor. And neither was having chronic pain.

“In our final model, pain interference in daily life was not a significant predictor of heroin initiation,” said lead author Brandon Marshall, an assistant professor in the Brown University School of Public Health.

Despite those findings, researchers recommend that all veterans should be screened for painkiller abuse, including those with legal prescriptions.

"This paper shows that, as a general clinical practice, particularly for this population which does experience a lot of chronic pain and other risks for substance use including PTSD, screening for non-medical painkiller use, whether you are prescribing an opioid or not, may be effective to prevent even more harmful transitions to heroin or other drugs," said Marshall, adding that veterans have a "constellation of risks" for substance abuse.

The study, published in the journal Addiction, did not identify the source of the opioids that were used non-medically. The National Institutes of Health and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs supported the study.

Under a federal spending bill passed by Congress and signed into law last year by President Obama, the Veteran’s Administration is required to follow the CDC's “voluntary” opioid guidelines, which discourage opioid prescribing for chronic pain. Since those guidelines were adopted, many veterans have complained to Pain News Network that their opioid doses have been reduced and they live in daily pain.

“They just cut my meds to one oxycodone every 12 hours, which gives me absolutely no relief,” wrote Harvey Williams, a Vietnam vet. “There must be something that the Veterans Administration can do to treat severe pain in the Vets. It's not fair for us to be sprayed with Agent Orange, return back to the United States, develop diabetes and in turn have severe neuropathy and pain for the rest of our lives and not be treated.”

“My VA doctors did not exam me prior to (cutting) my prescriptions,” wrote retired Army Capt. William Green, a Desert Storm veteran. “I asked how they decided to start reducing when I was reporting ongoing 6-8 on 10 pain scale. He didn't even consult with the doctor I do get ongoing treatment from. The doctor said, ‘We don’t care. We are following CDC guidelines.’”

The VA provides health services to 6 million veterans and their families. Over half of the veterans treated by the VA have chronic pain.   

‘Weird and Cool’ Discovery Could Lead to Safer Opioid

By Pat Anson, Editor

A “weird and cool” discovery by a team of international researchers could lead to the development of a new opioid medication that relieves pain without the risk of abuse and overdose.

In a case of reverse engineering, scientists in the U.S. and Germany deciphered the atomic structure of the brain’s mu-opioid receptor and then designed a drug – called PZM21 – that activates the receptor without the typical side effects of opioids. In experiments on mice, PZM21 did not cause drug-seeking behavior and did not interfere with breathing – the main cause of death in opioid overdoses.

“With traditional forms of drug discovery, you’re locked into a little chemical box,” said Brian Shoichet, PhD, a professor of pharmaceutical chemistry at UC San Francisco’s School of Pharmacy.

“But when you start with the structure of the receptor you want to target, you can throw all those constraints away. You’re empowered to imagine all sorts of things that you couldn’t even think about before.”

Shoichet and colleagues at Stanford University, the University of North Carolina and the Friedrich Alexander University in Erlangen, Germany published their findings in the journal Nature.

"This promising drug candidate was identified through an intensively cross-disciplinary, cross-continental combination of computer-based drug screening, medicinal chemistry, intuition and extensive preclinical testing," said Brian Kobilka, MD, a Nobel Prize winner and professor of molecular and cellular physiology at Stanford. It was Kobilka who first established the molecular structure of the opioid receptor.

Shoichet and his research team conducted roughly four trillion “virtual experiments” on UCSF computers, simulating how millions of different drug candidates could turn and twist in millions of different angles – called “molecular docking” -- to see how they fit into a pocket on the receptor and activate it. They avoided using molecules linked to the respiratory suppression and constipation typical of other opioids.

This led to the development of PZM21, which efficiently blocked pain in mice without producing the constipation and breathing suppression typical of other opioids. PZM21 also appears to dull pain by affecting opioid circuits in the brain only, with little effect on opioid receptors in the spinal cord. No other opioid has that effect, which Shoichet says is “unprecedented, weird and cool.”

The drug also didn’t produce the hyperactivity that other opioids trigger in mice by activating the brain’s dopamine systems. The mice did not display drug-seeking behavior by spending more time in chambers where they had previously received doses of PZM21.

“After we replicated the lab experiments and mouse studies several times, then I became excited about the potential of this new drug,” said Bryan Roth, MD, a professor of pharmacology and medicinal chemistry at University of North Carolina.

Researchers say more work is needed to establish that PZM21 is truly non-addictive, and to confirm that it is safe and effective in humans.

 “We haven’t shown this is truly non-addictive,” Shoichet cautioned. “At this point we’ve just shown that mice don’t appear motivated to seek out the drug.”

Listen to the Voices Silenced by Overdoses

By Judy Rummler, Guest Columnist

In reply to the recent article in Pain News Network about the Steve Rummler Hope Foundation, I want first of all to say that I have great compassion for those with chronic pain. 

My son Steve suffered from back pain for 15 years and many of the staff and volunteers of the Steve Rummler Hope Foundation have family members who have also suffered with chronic pain.  Sadly, many of us have lost our loved ones to opioid overdoses and we are working to prevent this from happening to other families. 

Had more cautious and responsible opioid prescribing practices been implemented before Steve died of an accidental overdose, he would have been terrified at the thought of losing access to his opioid pain medication.  He had developed the disease of addiction and had come to believe that his pills were the only solution for his chronic pain. 

Steve was a dean’s list student, all-conference soccer player and a gifted musician. He had many friends and a loving fiancée and family, yet he lost interest in almost everything that had once been important to him. 

He experienced the dilemma facing those who need treatment for both chronic pain and addiction.  Among his belongings we found a note describing his pills that said, “At first they were a lifeline; now they are a noose around my neck.” 

JUDY RUMMLER

It is important to remember that, while we can all hear the calls for relief from those who are suffering with chronic pain, we can no longer hear the 200,000 plus silenced voices of those who have died from opioid overdoses.  These people did not want to die and many of them would have lived if physicians had practiced more cautious and responsible prescribing.  Like most doctors, Steve’s doctor was well-intentioned but had received little training on the prescribing of opioids for pain.  

In an effort to provide this much-needed training, the Steve Rummler Hope Foundation has created a lecture series on “Pain, Opioids and Addiction” in partnership with the Minnesota Medical Association (MMA) and the University of Minnesota Medical School.  

These lectures are presented to medical students, videotaped and made available for continuing medical education (CME) at no cost on the MMA website.  The hope of the series is to create a medical curriculum on pain, opioids and addiction as it should be in a medical school setting: balanced, practical, evidence-based information free of commercial bias.

The mission of the Steve Rummler Hope Foundation is to heighten awareness of the dilemma of chronic pain and the disease of addiction, and to improve the associated care process.  We provide hope for those with chronic pain and addiction through our three programs: Overdose Prevention, Prescriber Education and Advocacy.  More information is available on our website.

Judy Rummler is a co-founder of the Steve Rummler Hope Foundation, a 501 (c) (3) non-profit organization based in Minnesota. The foundation recently became the fiscal sponsor of Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing (PROP).

 Pain News Network invites other readers to share their stories with us.  Send them to:  editor@PainNewsNetwork.org. 

The information in this column should not be considered as professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. It is for informational purposes only and represents the author’s opinions alone. It does not inherently express or reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Pain News Network.

Study: Long Term Opioid Use Rare After Surgery

Pat Anson, Editor

It’s become a popular belief that many people become addicted to opioid pain medication after surgery. According to a recent national survey, one in ten pain patients believe they became addicted or dependent on opioids after they started taking them for post-operative pain.

But a large new study in Canada found that long term opioid use after surgery is extremely rare, with less than one percent of older adults still taking opioid pain medication a year after major elective surgery.

The study, published in the journal JAMA Surgery, looked at over 39,000 “opioid naïve” patients (no opioid prescriptions in the prior year) over age 65 who had a heart, lung, colon, prostate or hysterectomy surgery from 2003 to 2010.

One year after the surgery, only 168 of the surviving patients were still prescribed opioids – a rate of just 0.4 percent.

“Exposure to opioids is largely unavoidable after major surgery because they are routinely used to treat postoperative pain,” wrote lead author Hance Clarke, MD, Toronto Western Hospital.

In a previous study, Clarke and his colleagues looked at opioid use after major surgery and found that about 3% of patients were still taking opioids after three months. They decided to do this follow-up study to see how many were still being prescribed opioids 180 days, 270 days and 365 days after surgery. They found a steady decline in opioid use throughout the year.

“The estimate of 0.4% of patients continuing to receive opioids at 1 year is consistent with some limited available data,” Clarke wrote. “Our study thus provides reassurance that the individual risk of long-term opioid use in opioid-naive surgical patients is low.”

Earlier this year the American Pain Society (APS) released guidelines for postoperative pain care that encourage the use of non-opioid medications such as acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), gabapentin (Neurotin) and pregabalin (Lyrica).  The APS also said epidural injections could be used for pain relief during some surgeries.

A survey of over 1,200 pain patients by Pain News Network and the International Pain Foundation found that two-thirds of patients believe that non-opioid medication “did not help at all” in the hospital. Another 60 percent said their pain was not adequately controlled in the hospital after a surgery or treatment.

PROP Ends Affiliation with Phoenix House

By Pat Anson, Editor

Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing (PROP), an influential and politically connected advocacy group that seeks to reduce opioid prescribing, is no longer directly affiliated with Phoenix House, which runs a nationwide chain of addiction treatment centers.

The Steve Rummler Hope Foundation is now the “fiscal sponsor” of PROP, which will allow PROP to collect tax deductible donations under the foundation’s 501 (c) (3) non-profit status. IRS regulations allow non-profits to form partnerships with like-minded organizations, allowing other groups to essentially piggyback off their non-profit status and collect donations.  

Like PROP, the foundation’s main goal is to reduce opioid prescribing. It is named after Steve Rummler, a Minnesota pain patient who became addicted to opioid medication while being treated for a back injury.

After several attempts at addiction treatment, Rummler relapsed and died of a heroin overdose at the age of 43.

“He struggled with the pain for a long time,” said Judy Rummler, Steve’s mother and chief financial officer of the foundation.  “He had what I think later was figured out to be some damage to the nervous system around his spinal cord because he had what he described as shooting electric shock-like sensations that would shoot up his back into his head and down his legs into his feet.”

Steve sought help from many doctors, but never received a treatable diagnosis. He started taking OxyContin for pain relief. 

“Once he was prescribed the opioids in 2005, then he didn’t care about getting answers anymore,” his mother said.

After Steve’s death in 2011, the Rummler family established the foundation with the goal of helping others who also struggle with chronic pain and addiction. It was PROP’s founder and chief executive, Andrew Kolodny, MD, who approached the foundation with the idea of joining forces.

“Basically as the fiscal sponsor we accept donations and we manage the funding. We don’t set any policy for him,” Judy Rummler told Pain News Network. “Obviously our missions are similar. We are very concerned about the overprescribing of opioids. Yet I know if my son were alive today he would probably be telling you what you hear from so many other pain patients; that he couldn’t live without them. But the problem was he died as a result of it.

“I know there are a lot of people who are going to be hurt by cutting back on the prescribing, but I just think a lot of them are addicted as my son was. Yet he would have been the first one to scream and yell about having his pills cutoff.”

The Rummler Foundation calls this tug-of-war between opioids and addiction “The Dilemma.” It advocates for wholesale change in the treatment of chronic pain, emphasizing “wellness rather than drugs” and the use of “a wide array of non-opioid options.”

Opioid medication should not be prescribed for chronic pain, according to Rummler.

“I would never say that it’s impossible for it to work for someone. I wouldn’t say that. But I would say there’s no evidence it would work. And it shouldn’t be prescribed that way,” she said.  “There are so many people dying. I hate to even use the term ‘abuse’ because I don’t think my son, really, I mean at the end he was an abuser, for sure. But it wasn’t abuse that got him addicted. It was the prescribing that got him addicted.”  

In addition to promoting awareness about opioid addiction, the Rummler Foundation sponsors prescriber education courses and provides free naloxone rescue kits to reverse the effects of opioid overdoses.

Links with PROP

The Rummler Foundation already has a lengthy association with PROP. Kolodny serves on the foundation’s medical advisory committee, as does Jane Ballantyne, MD, PROP’s president. The two groups have also participated together in several advocacy campaigns.

While PROP no longer considers itself “a program” of Phoenix House, Kolodny is still listed as the chief medical officer for the organization.

For several years, PROP lobbied the FDA, DEA and other federal agencies to reduce the prescribing of opioids with mixed success. Recently it played a significant role in the development of the CDC’s opioid guidelines, which discourage primary care physicians from prescribing opioids for chronic pain. Kolodny, Ballantyne and three other PROP officers and board members served on panels advising the CDC.

As Pain News Network has reported, Ballantyne and two other PROP board members are currently participating in CDC funded webinars to teach prescribers how to implement the guidelines. Those guidelines, which were released in March, have already had a significant impact on the pain community. In a recent survey, over two-thirds of patients said their opioid medication has been reduced or stopped by their doctor. About half said they have considered suicide as a way to end their pain since the guidelines were released. 

In addition to his new affiliation with the Rummler Foundation, Kolodny is working with the Los Angeles-based Media Policy Center in developing a documentary on opioids and addiction. PROP is listed as one of the partners in the project, along with the Semel Institute of Neurobiology and the Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA.

The Media Policy Center (MPC), which declined to comment for this story, states on its website that it hopes to release the documentary in November and eventually air it on PBS.

“The best way to prevent deaths and overdose is through education,” MPC says in a statement on its GoFundMe campaign. “Many people have the misconception that opioids, such as OxyContin, are safe because they are prescription drugs, however, they are very addictive and once people lose access to their prescriptions or can no longer afford the drug they may turn to drugs like heroin.”

PNN has learned that several prominent doctors in the field of pain management have been approached to participate in a “debate” with Kolodny for the program. All have declined because they fear the documentary will be biased.

New Rule Expands Access to Buprenorphine

By Pat Anson, Editor

This week marks the start of a major expansion in access to buprenorphine – a medication that is both widely praised for treating opioid addiction and also blamed for fanning the flames of abuse and diversion.

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) updated a federal rule, nearly tripling the number patients that can be treated with buprenorphine by an eligible physician.

Raising the limit from 100 to 275 patients is intended to give addicts greater access to buprenorphine, especially in rural areas where few doctors are certified to prescribe the drug. According to HHS, over two million people who are dependent on heroin and other opioids could benefit from buprenorphine treatment.

“For too long, addiction specialists like me have had to turn patients in need away from treatment that might save their lives, not because we don’t have the expertise or capacity to treat them, but because of an arbitrary federal limit,” said Dr. Jeffrey Goldsmith, President of the American Society of Addiction Medicine .

But critics of the rule change say there will be a price to pay.

“Buprenorphine is one of the most abused pharmaceuticals in the world,” warns Percy Menzies, president of Assisted Recovery Centers of America, which operates four addiction treatment clinics in the St. Louis area.

“Sales of buprenorphine formulations have exceeded $2 billion a year, but we have not had any lessening of heroin addiction. Increased access to buprenorphine and increased availability of potent heroin and heroin laced drugs like fentanyl will only exacerbate the problem.”

The problem with buprenorphine is that it’s an opioid that can be used to treat pain or addiction. When combined with naloxone, buprenorphine reduces cravings for opioids and lowers the risk of abuse. For many years the drug was sold exclusively under the brand name Suboxone, but it is now produced by several different drug makers and is sold in tablets, sublingual films and even an implant.

Addicts long ago discovered that buprenorphine can also be used to get high or to ease their withdrawal pains from heroin and other opioids. Buprenorphine is such a popular street drug that the National Forensic Laboratory Information System ranked buprenorphine as the third most diverted opioid medication in the U.S. in 2014. 

“Too many physicians erroneously believe that naloxone in the formulation makes the drug safe,” Menzies said in an email to Pain News Network. “Increasing the limit is definitely going to increase diversion. The majority of the physicians prescribing buprenorphine do not provide any comprehensive relapse prevention counseling, random drug testing, etc. In the absence of standards for treating addictive disorders, anything goes and will be no different than treating chronic pain.

“We saw the problem with prescription opioids when opioids were promoted as safe and non-abusable in the treatment of chronic pain. Very quickly the numbers grew into the tens of millions and the addiction exploded. The unintended victims were the patients in genuine chronic pain.”

Menzies uses buprenorphine as an initial treatment for opioid addiction in his clinics, but prefers another medication -- naltrexone -- for long-term maintenance therapy. He says doctors who rely on buprenorphine exclusively will, in effect, be sentencing their patients to lifetime use of the drug.     

"Financial Opportunity" for Doctors

HHS acknowledges there could be “unintended negative consequences” to increased prescribing of buprenorphine. One is diversion. Another is an increase in patient volume, physician profits and buprenorphine “pill mills” – which are already popping up in states like Florida. Patients typically pay cash for buprenorphine at those clinics and receive little or no addiction counseling or services.  

“This proposed rule directly expands opportunities for physicians who currently treat or who may treat patients with buprenorphine,” HHS said in an extensive analysis of the rule change. “We believe that this may translate to a financial opportunity for these physicians.”

HHS estimates the cost of treating new buprenorphine patients at up to $313 million in the first year alone. Many of the patients are low-income and the bills for treating them – about $4,300 annually for each patient – will often be covered by Medicaid. The additional cost of treating these patients, according to HHS, will be offset by the health benefits achieved by getting addicts into treatment, which the agency generously estimates at $1.7 billion.

The Obama administration asked Congress for nearly $1 billion in additional funding to help pay for addiction treatment, but didn’t get it in when Congress passed the Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act (CARA Act). The President reluctantly signed the bill into law anyway.

A little noticed provision of the CARA Act is that it expands access to buprenorphine even further. Currently only a trained and certified physician can prescribe buprenorphine, but CARA requires HHS to update its rules within 18 months to allow nurse practitioners and physician assistants to prescribe buprenorphine, provided they undergo training first.

How can buprenorphine diversion be prevented when access to it is rapidly increasing?

One solution proposed by Menzies is to change the classification of buprenorphine from a Schedule III controlled substance to a Schedule II drug – the same classification change that hydrocodone went through in 2014. Such a move would limit buprenorphine prescriptions to an initial 90-day supply and require patients to see a doctor for a new prescription each time they need a refill.

“We are caught between a rock and a hard place. We need to increase access to buprenorphine and it will lead to increased diversion and abuse, and therefore I am recommending changing the schedule,” Menzies said in his email to PNN.

“This is the psychotic state of affairs! No chronic condition/disease/disorder has ever been successfully treated with an addicting drug and we think we can do it for opioid addiction!”

DEA: U.S. Facing ‘Fentanyl Crisis’

By Pat Anson, Editor

The United States is facing an unprecedented “fentanyl crisis” that is likely to grow worse as drug dealers ramp up production of counterfeit pain medication made with illicit fentanyl, according to a new report from the Drug Enforcement Administration.

Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid 50 to 100 times more potent than morphine. It is legally prescribed in patches and lozenges to treat severe chronic pain, but illicit fentanyl has recently emerged as a fast-growing scourge on the black market, where it is increasingly being used in the manufacture of counterfeit drugs.

“The counterfeit pills often closely resemble the authentic medications they were designed to mimic, and the presence of fentanyls is only detected upon laboratory analysis,” the DEA warns in the unclassified report.

“Fentanyls will continue to appear in counterfeit opioid medications and will likely appear in a variety of non-opiate drugs as traffickers seek to expand the market in search of higher profits. Overdoses and deaths from counterfeit drugs containing fentanyls will increase as users continue to inaccurately dose themselves with imitation medications.”

Dozens of Americans have died this year after ingesting counterfeit versions of oxycodone, Norco and Xanax, which are virtually indistinguishable from the real medications. Even a few milligrams of fentanyl can be fatal.

Tennessee bureau of investigation

The DEA said “hundreds of thousands of counterfeit prescription drugs” laced with fentanyl were on the market and predicted more would be produced because of heavy demand and the “enormous profit potential” of fake medication.

“The seizures of fentanyl-laced pills and clandestine pill press operations all across North America indicate that this is becoming a trend, not a series of isolated incidents,” the DEA said.

The report highlighted the fact that U.S. forensic laboratories tested over 13,000 seized drugs containing fentanyl in 2015, up sharply from less than a thousand cases two years earlier.

The DEA said counterfeit pills are being smuggled into the U.S. from Mexico and Canada. Traffickers usually purchase powdered fentanyl and pill presses from China, and pill press operations have recently been found in Los Angeles and New York.

The counterfeit drugs problem is so serious the DEA believes it is undermining efforts to limit opioid prescribing.

“The arrival of large amounts of counterfeit prescription drugs containing fentanyls on the market threatens to devalue such initiatives and replaces opioid medications taken off of the street,” the DEA said. “Although not all controlled prescription drug users eventually switch to heroin, fentanyl-laced pills give DTOs (drug trafficking organizations) broader access to the large controlled prescription drug user population, which is reliant upon diversion of legitimate pills. This could undermine positive results from the state Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs, as well as from legislative and law enforcement programs.”

As Pain News Network has reported, Massachusetts and Rhode Island recently said fentanyl was to blame for nearly 60 percent of their opioid overdose deaths.

Senators Urge DEA to Reduce Supply of Opioids

A group of U.S. Senators is urging the DEA to "aggressively combat the opioid epidemic," not by going after fentanyl traffickers, but by making legal opioids even harder to get.

In a letter to acting DEA administrator Chuck Rosenberg, Senators Dick Durbin (D-IL) Sherrod Brown (D-OH), Edward Markey (D-MA), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Angus King (I-ME), and Joe Manchin (D-WV) urged the agency to tighten its annual quotas for manufacturers to produce controlled substances.

"In effect, DEA serves as a gatekeeper for how many opioids are allowed to be legally sold every year in the United States. Yet, for the past two decades, DEA has approved significant increases in the aggregate volume of opioids allowed to be produced for sale," the letter states.

The Senators urged the agency to rollback a 25 percent increase in production quotas for Schedule II opioids that was implemented in 2013. Schedule II opioids include hydrocodone, a widely prescribed painkiller that was reclassified from a Schedule III to a Schedule II drug in 2014.

The Senators also said the DEA should make a mid-year adjustment in the quota to immediately reduce the supply of prescription opioids. The letter did not address the fentanyl crisis or the rapid growth in counterfeit medication.

Lower Back Pain Linked to More Drug Use

By Pat Anson, Editor

People with chronic lower back pain are more likely to have used illicit drugs -- including marijuana, cocaine, heroin and methamphetamine -- compared to those without back pain, according to new research published in the journal Spine.

The study also found that people with lower back pain who had used illicit drugs were somewhat more likely to have an active prescription for opioid pain medication (22.5% vs. 15%).

Lower back pain is the world’s leading cause of disability and most people will suffer from it at least once in their lives. Although nearly a quarter of the opioid prescriptions written in the U.S. are for low back pain, medical guidelines often recommend against it.

Researchers analyzed data from over 5,000 U.S. adults who participated in a nationally representative health study and found that nearly half (49%) of those who reported lower back pain admitted having a history of illicit drug use, compared to 43% of those without back pain.

Current use of illicit drugs (within the past 30 days) was much lower in both groups; 14% versus nine percent.

The study did not differentiate between recreational and medical marijuana use, nor did it draw a distinction between marijuana use in states where it is legal and where it is not. All marijuana use was considered "illicit."

All four illicit drugs in the survey were more commonly used by people with low back pain compared to those without back pain. Rates of lifetime use were 46.5% versus 42% for marijuana; 22% vs. 14% for cocaine; 9% vs. 5% for methamphetamine; and 5% vs. 2% for heroin.

Researchers said there was no evidence that illicit drug use causes lower back pain, only that there was an association between the two that bears watching when opioids are prescribed.

“The association between a history of illicit drug use and prescription opioid use in the cLBP (chronic lower back pain) population is consistent with previous studies, but may be confounded by other clinical conditions,” said lead author Anna Shmagel, MD, Division of Rheumatic and Autoimmune Diseases at the University of Minnesota.

“Mental health disorders, for example, have been associated with both illicit substance use and prescription opioid use in the chronic low back pain population. In the context of management, however, illicit drug abuse is predictive of aberrant prescription opioid behaviors. As we face a prescription opioid addiction epidemic, careful assessment of illicit drug use history may aid prescribing decisions.”

In a recent analysis of prescriptions filled for 12 million of its members, pharmacy benefit manager Prime Therapeutics found that nearly a quarter of the opioid prescriptions were written to treat low back pain.

"Our analysis found low back pain was the most common diagnosis among all members taking an opioid, even though medical guidelines suggest the risks are likely greater than the benefits for these individuals," said Catherine Starner, PharmD, lead health researcher for Prime Therapeutics.

In a 2014 position paper, the American Academy of Neurology said opioids provide “significant short term pain relief” for low back pain, but there was “no substantial evidence” that long term use outweighs the risk of addiction and overdose.

Doctor: Pain Has Never Killed Anyone

By John Hsu, MD, Guest Columnist

The opioid problem with medicine began when The Joint Commission promoted the concept that pain is the fifth vital sign, and that patients should be asked about their pain and the quality of their treatment.

Ten years ago, when my hospital was undergoing an inspection, I clearly remember the examiner chastising me about my multimodal pain therapy and her concern that it would leave patients in pain. Clearly, doctors were put on alert that they could be sued for leaving a patient in pain.

Pain as a fifth vital sign is really contraindicated. Pain has never killed anyone, but opioids killed over 29,000 Americans last year. They don’t have any vital signs.

Doctors are now at a crossroads. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) has attached patient satisfaction scores to reimbursement. A patient comes to the office and demands pain meds. If the doctor prescribes pain meds, the doctor can not only lose their license, but go to jail for murder, as Dr. Lisa Tseng from Rowland Heights, CA has. Or they can risk poor patient satisfaction scores and, if they are a part of an accountable care organization (ACO), risk losing their employment.

Why are doctors burned out? Because other people have come between the doctor-patient relationship. I had a nurse tell me that she would put her 21 years in ICU up to my skills as a physician, to which I retorted that she still had to take orders from me.

This loss of respect amid the loss of autonomy is frightening.  It is one of the major complaints doctors describe when they are asked about burnout and why they are leaving medicine. The healthcare team is no longer run by the doctor. It is run by nurses from the quality review department, enforcing best practices on physicians so protocols and guidelines set up by the government are followed.

I call that evidence-less based medicine. Guidelines have destroyed the doctor-patient relationship. Does the government really have patient interests at heart or is the government really just a big micromanager? 

Perhaps the answer to the opioid problem lies with outside-the-box thinking. What if we correctly promote that pain must be present for us to live and that some pain is good?  Unlike Patrick Henry, who said “Give me liberty or give me death,” I personally would prefer to say, "Give me pain and give me liberty, but don't give me death."

Patients have a responsibility to take care of their own health. All prescriptions written by doctors and filled by pharmacists were written correctly. Yet some patients are not compliant and take too many pills. We all know we should not overeat, but 70% of the American public is obese. Humans are their own worst enemies.  Unpopular as this stance may seem, it must be mentioned that while the population of the U.S. is 324 million, 259 million opioid prescription were written in in 2012. 

The Joint Commission's edict that no patient should be in pain changed patients' expectations. Everyone expected and demanded to be pain free. But focusing on the short term discomfort experienced by those in pain ignores the long term goal of improving a patient's health.

The government (FDA, DEA, CDC and policymakers) has decided to restrict opioid prescriptions. This is logical, but does not address human nature. The end result has been that addicts and patients who cannot get prescription opioids have turned to cheaper and easily attainable $5 bags of heroin. Heroin deaths have quadrupled in the last decade. In 2015, over 10,000 people died from heroin overdoses. The situation is rapidly worsening, as illicit drug makers are mixing heroin with fentanyl, which is 70 times stronger than morphine. 

The opioid conundrum has become readily apparent. Opioids may be the best treatment for pain, but they raise the risk of addiction, respiratory suppression, and death.

Cultural Shift Needed in Patient Education

The solutions needed for this dilemma include a cultural shift in the education physicians and nurses give to patients and the perception that pain is bad. We have to forsake the short term treatment of pain with opioids and look to the long term goal of preserving human life.

Let’s look at patient satisfaction scores and medical education. Studies show that when patient satisfaction scores are considered in prescribing care to patients, their care is not only more expensive, but often worse -- resulting in higher morbidity and mortality. Despite this evidence, CMS has connected patient satisfaction scores to hospital reimbursement. 

The Joint Commission has promoted an atmosphere where patients believe that they should never have to suffer pain and have the right to be “pain free.” More opioids were prescribed, but often patients demanded and even threatened doctors if they did obtain pain relief.  Doctors were accused of elder abuse and medical negligence if they did not prescribe pain medication, despite the lack of medical indications or consideration of narcotic alternatives. 

Fast forward a decade and suddenly the government realized that more addicts existed and more people were overdosing. Nearly 19,000 people died in 2014 from opioid prescription overdoses legally obtained from physicians and correctly filled by pharmacists.  The government ironically declared that doctors were to blame. 

The government could not blame patients for the problem, even though the general consensus is that patients were non-compliant with their prescribed opioid doses and shared their narcotics with family and friends.  Patients were not blamed for their actions because they vote and they reelect government officials. 

The government’s solution to the current opioid overdose epidemic was a policy change.  The FDA and CDC forced physicians to limit opioid prescriptions, and increased the difficulty of prescribing opioids by changing the scheduling of hydrocodone from Schedule III to Schedule II.  The government also began criminally prosecuting physicians for murder, even though the patient was noncompliant and overdosed on opioids. 

Why did the The Joint Commission, representing the federal government, have to get involved in medicine?  Why should a federal entity interfere with the doctor-patient relationship? It is not our fault that policies make us do certain things we believe are not in the best interest of the patient.

The Hippocratic Oath directs physicians to not allow outside influences effect their patient care decisions. I would like to see medicine practiced so that the government can no longer come between patients and their doctors. Let us amend the constitution so that there is a separation of medicine and state, just like the separation of church and state.  

JOHN HSU, MD

John Hsu, MD, has been practicing anesthesia at 600-bed hospital inCalifornia for the past 23 years.

Dr. Hsu recently founded MedRev Pharma, a pharmaceutical development company which is developing a safer opioid that minimizes the risk of abuse, addiction and respiratory depression.  Dr. Hsu is also the Director of SBS Medical Management, a consultation service that addresses issues relating to healthcare reform policies, physician practice management, and medical devices.

Pain News Network invites other readers to share their stories with us.  Send them to:  editor@PainNewsNetwork.org. 

The information in this column should not be considered as professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. It is for informational purposes only and represents the author’s opinions alone. It does not inherently express or reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Pain News Network.

DEA: ‘Hundreds of Thousands’ of Fake Pills in U.S.

By Pat Anson, Editor

A new report from the U.S. Drug Enforcement Association about the national threat posed by heroin may tell us more about another illegal opioid – fentanyl -- than it does about heroin.

The recently unclassified report, which you can read by clicking here, documents a stunning 248% increase in overdose deaths involving heroin from 2010 to 2014. Over 10,500 Americans died from heroin overdoses in 2014 alone.

But it turns out many of those deaths may have actually been caused by fentanyl, a synthetic opioid 50 to 100 times more potent than morphine. We’re not talking about pharmaceutical grade fentanyl legally prescribed in transdermal patches or lozenges to treat chronic pain, but bootleg white powder fentanyl manufactured in China and smuggled into the U.S.

The DEA says there were 5,544 deaths caused by fentanyl and other synthetic opioids in 2014, but admits “the true number is most likely higher.” The actual number is not known because many coroners and state crime laboratories do not test for fentanyl.

What medical examiners do often test for in suspected drug overdoses is heroin – and that is why the statistics on heroin should be taken with a grain of salt. Because the real culprit is often fentanyl.

“Most of the areas affected by the fentanyl overdoses are in the eastern United States, where white powder heroin is used,” the DEA report states. “Fentanyl is most commonly mixed with white powder heroin or is sold disguised as white powder heroin.”

Massachusetts and Rhode Island – two eastern states with big heroin problems – recently came out with reports showing that fentanyl, not heroin, was to blame for nearly 60 percent of their opioid overdose deaths. The states used toxicology tests that are far more accurate than the death certificate codes used by the DEA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.  

The DEA and CDC overdose statistics are muddied even further by the fact that heroin deaths are “often undercounted” and blamed on morphine, a prescription painkiller.

“Many medical examiners are reluctant to characterize a death as heroin related,” the DEA admits. “Thus many heroin deaths are reported as morphine-related deaths. Further, there is no standardized system for reporting drug related deaths in the United States. The manner of collecting and reporting death data varies with each medical examiner and coroner.”

Why does any of this matter to chronic pain patients? Because deaths caused by fentanyl and heroin are being lumped together with overdoses caused by prescription painkillers. The CDC has been doing it for years to build a case against opioid pain medication and to justify its release of guidelines that discourage doctors from prescribing opioids for chronic pain.

Prescribing of opioid pain medication has been in decline for several years and hydrocodone prescriptions have fallen by 30 percent since 2011. Yet the CDC claims there was a sudden spike in opioid analgesic deaths in 2014 and that nearly 19,000 Americans died.

Some pain patients – no longer able to get opioids legally – are turning to the streets for pain relief. And the DEA report acknowledges that patients are now being targeted by drug dealers selling counterfeit medication.

“Hundreds of thousands of counterfeit prescriptions pills, some containing deadly amounts of fentanyl, have been introduced into U.S. drug markets, exacerbating the fentanyl and opioid crisis,” the DEA report says. “Motivated by enormous profit potential, traffickers are exploiting high consumer demand for prescription medications by producing inexpensive, fraudulent prescription pills containing fentanyl.

“The equipment and materials necessary to produce these counterfeit drugs are widely available online for a small initial investment, greatly reducing the barrier of entry into production for small-scale drug trafficking groups and individuals. In addition, fentanyl pill press operations have been identified in the United States, Canada, and Mexico, indicating a vast expansion of the traditional illicit fentanyl market.”  

The DEA says counterfeit medication caused at least 19 deaths this year in California and Florida. But, like the statistics for fentanyl and heroin, the actual number may never be known.   

When asked to comment on the DEA report, a spokesperson for the CDC told us that "the large distribution of pills seems to be a new threat that we are still assessing."

Should Pain Patients Be Prescribed Naloxone?

By Pat Anson, Editor

A medication that rapidly reverses the effects of an opioid overdose should be prescribed to patients taking opioid analgesics for chronic pain, according to a study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

But the study fails to address the soaring cost of naloxone and whether pain patients can afford it.

In a pilot program at primary care clinics in San Francisco, doctors gave naloxone “rescue kits” to nearly 2,000 pain patients on long-term opioid therapy, and found that they had 63 percent fewer opioid-related emergency rooms visits in one year than patients not prescribed naloxone. Naloxone is usually administered by injection to reverse the effects of an overdose and has been credited with saving thousands of lives.

Naloxone has rapidly gone mainstream in recent years as public health officials have reacted to the so-called opioid epidemic. The rescue kits are increasingly being carried by police and paramedics, and given to heroin and opioid addicts to keep at home. But they are not usually prescribed to people taking opioids for pain relief.

Researchers say being given a rescue kit and being trained how to use one may have made pain patients in the study more careful with their opioids, without the kits ever actually being used.

“The educational component of the intervention may have reduced ED (emergency department) visits by altering risky behaviors, thus preventing overdoses in the first place,” said lead author Alexander Walley, MD, in an editorial also published in the Annals of Internal Medicine. "Receiving a naloxone rescue kit may have served as tangible reinforcement of overdose prevention messages, though this warrants further study.”

university of washington

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently released opioid prescribing guidelines that encourage physicians to prescribe naloxone to high-risk patients.

“Providers should incorporate into the management plan strategies to mitigate risk, including considering offering naloxone when factors that increase risk for opioid overdose, such as history of overdose, history of substance use disorder, or higher opioid dosages (≥50 MME), are present,” the guidelines state.

The Food and Drug Administration is also encouraging the widespread distribution of naloxone. Last November, the agency approved Narcan -- a naloxone nasal spray – as an emergency life-saving medication. The approval came less than four months after the FDA received a new drug application from Adept Pharma. The process usually take the agency years to complete. 

“Anyone who uses prescription opioids for the long term management of chronic pain, or those who take heroin, are potentially at risk of experiencing a life-threatening or fatal opioid overdose where breathing and heart beat slow or stop,” Adept Pharma said in a statement.

The company said Narcan would be available at a “public interest price” of $75 for a package of two nasal sprays when ordered by public health  organizations.  For consumers, however, Narcan costs nearly twice as much. Healthcare Bluebook lists the retail “fair price” of Narcan at $134.

Prices for naloxone have soared in recent years as demand for the medication has increased. Some hospital emergency departments have run out of naloxone, according to Politico, and some drug makers are being accused of price gouging.

"You have increased demand and a few people who control the pricing, so they can charge whatever they want," said Eliza Wheeler, who runs an overdose prevention project in Northern California, in Politico.

Generic versions of naloxone cost only pennies in other countries, but in the U.S. an auto inject version sold by Kaleo Pharma soared from $575 for a two-dose package to $3,750, according to Truven Health Analytics.

“Opioid abuse is an epidemic across our country, yet drug companies continue to rip off the American people by charging the highest prices in the world because they have no shame,” Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders said in a statement. “The greed of the pharmaceutical industry is killing Americans.” 

Many drug makers offer discounts on naloxone rescue kits to hospitals, schools, non-profits and public agencies, but patients often wind up paying full price.

Wearable Devices Could Monitor Opioid Use

By Pat Anson, Editor

We’ve written before about wearable medical devices, a fast growing $2.8 billion industry aimed at helping us lead healthier lives. Some devices relieve pain, while others monitor your blood pressure, pulse, body temperature, sleep, or even the number of calories you’re burning.

One device can even be used as a sort of “Big Brother” to monitor your use of opioid pain medication.

A small study published in the Journal of Medical Toxicology followed 30 emergency room patients who were given opioids for severe acute pain. For four months the patients wore a Q sensor, a wristband device made by Affectiva,  a Massachusetts company that specializes in technology that tracks and measures human emotions.

The wristband only monitors skin temperature and locomotion (movement) of the user, but researchers found the data can be used to track and predict opioid use with a fair degree of accuracy.

Researchers say people who take opioids daily for pain or addiction treatment (methadone and buprenorphine) are more likely to fidget or show restless activity when they feel cravings for medication. A sudden decrease in movement and an increase in skin temperature can be signs that they had taken a dose of medication.   

affectiva photo

"The patterns may be useful to detect episodes of opioid use in real time," says lead author Stephanie Carreiro, MD, a professor of Emergency Medicine at the University of Massachusetts Medical School. "The ability to identify instances of opioid use and opioid tolerance in real time could for instance be helpful to manage pain or during substance abuse treatment."

Carreiro and her colleagues say wearable devices could help identify pain patients at risk for substance abuse or addiction. They could also be used to remotely monitor patients enrolled in addiction treatment programs to detect whether they are relapsing.

“Wearable biosensors show a consistent physiologic pattern after opioid administration in an ED (emergency department) population,” they said. “This biometric response shows some distinguishing features between heavy and non-heavy opioid users in a controlled ED setting. This pattern may be useful to detect episodes of opioid use in real time. Further study is needed to evaluate the potential diagnostic and interventional applications of these devices in drug abuse treatment and pain management."

The Q sensor was initially developed to monitor children with epilepsy or autism, but they’ve since grown into a tool used in consumer focus groups to measure responses to advertising. They’re also being tested in middle schools as an “engagement pedometer” to measure if students are interested in a particular subject.

Critics say the technology is creepy and the data it generates can easily be misinterpreted.

"In high school biology I didn't learn a thing all year, but boy was I stimulated. The girl who sat next to me was gorgeous. Just gorgeous," Arthur Goldstein, an English teacher and critic of the technology told Reuters.

Affectiva recently raised $14 million in funding to develop facial recognition software for video games.  

U.S. ‘Inundated’ with Fake Fentanyl Pills

By Pat Anson, Editor

With much of the U.S. focused on the so-called epidemic of prescription opioid abuse, another deadly problem is quietly taking root around the country: illicit fentanyl being sold as counterfeit pain medication.

“It’s unreal. They’re inundated with fentanyl in the Midwest and in the northeast,” says DEA spokesman Rusty Payne. “A lot of these fentanyl pills are being marketed as knockoff oxy (oxycodone).”

We first began reporting on the fake fentanyl pain pills in April, when 14 deaths in California and 9 in Florida were blamed on counterfeit medication.  Since then, the problem has spread to virtually every state.

In Massachusetts, Boston police are warning about counterfeit fentanyl pills that are nearly indistinguishable from prescription oxycodone.

“This dangerous drug is being sold to buyers who presume the pills, which are accurately formed and marked with the designation A/215, are Oxycodone 30 mg tablets. Anyone who ingests these Fentanyl pills may put themselves in serious danger of overdosing which can result in death,” police said.

In Layton, Utah, at least one recent overdose death is blamed on counterfeit roxicodone with the same markings.

LAYTON POLICE DEPT. PHOTO

“If you locate prescription pills with roxicodone markings "A" and "215" and you aren't sure where they originated from - use caution in handling them as you can absorb fentanyl through your skin,” the Layton police department warned in recent a Facebook post. “Counterfeit prescription pills are being made by street drug dealers and sold on the street, as they are cheaper and easier to obtain.”

In West Virginia, officials are investigating three non-fatal overdoses possibly caused by fentanyl disguised as Xanax, an anti-anxiety medication.

“You can tell it’s not really Xanax — if you look at the two they look the same, but not quite,” Dr. Elizabeth Scharman, director of the West Virginia Poison Center, told the Charleston Gazette-Mail. “The brand-name 2-milligram Xanax tablets are not that popular, so many people haven’t seen them before, and to them they look the same.”

And in Alabama, a routine traffic stop this week led to the arrest of a man with a vial of marijuana and a bag full of 78 white tablets. The pills looked similar to Xanax, but when tested were found to contain fentanyl.

Buyers Playing Russian Roulette

Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid that is 50 to 100 times more potent than morphine and can be lethal in very small doses. It is available legally by prescription in patches and lozenges to treat more severe types of acute and chronic pain, but illicitly manufactured fentanyl is fast becoming a scourge across the U.S. and Canada.

“It’s just Russian roulette,” says the DEA’s Payne. “Pharmaceutical grade fentanyl that you have in hospitals and such, that’s really not what we’re talking about here. We’re talking about black market, underground labs in China that are manufacturing this stuff.”

Unsuspecting buyers, including some pain patients who were unable to get opioid medication legally, have no idea the drug they’re getting from a dealer or friend could be lethal.  The dealers may be killing their own customers, but they’re driven by profit.

“We found that the profit margin in fentanyl is so much larger than heroin. And so have the Mexican cartels and the drug organizations,” said Payne. “A kilo of fentanyl versus a kilo of heroin on the street, when you cut it up and adulterate it enough to get it ready for street level distribution, they’re making a million to two million dollars from a kilo of fentanyl versus $80,000 for a kilo of heroin. So finances and profit are really playing a part in this. And you’ve got people here who are so addicted to opioids that there’s a market for it unfortunately.

In the past year, the DEA has issued two public safety alerts about fentanyl, but the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has remained relatively quiet about the problem – focusing instead on guidelines to reduce the prescribing of legal opioid medications.  So have many politicians, who have railed against opioid prescribing while supporting more federal funding for addiction treatment.

But the fentanyl problem is becoming too big to ignore.

States like Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Ohio and Delaware have reported an “alarming surge” in fentanyl related deaths in recent months. In some states, the number of deaths from fentanyl now exceeds those from prescription opioids.

“We think fentanyl and fentanyl overdoses have been underreported over the years in a lot of places. But we think people are now starting to pay more attention to it,” says Payne.

What no one seems willing to admit is that – while fentanyl dealers may be killing their customers – restricting access to legal opioids may only be creating new ones. In Canada’s western province of British Columbia, where fentanyl is involved in over half the drug overdoses, regulators have adopted opioid prescribing guidelines that are even more stringent than the CDC’s.

“The guidelines will make it much harder for pain sufferers, but will do absolutely nothing to discourage abuse and addiction. That population just goes on to something else as we all know from history,” said Barry Ulmer, Executive Director of the Chronic Pain Association of Canada.

The guidelines are forcing pain sufferers like Hugh Lamkin to buy fentanyl off the street because doctors won't give him an opioid prescription for arthritis and chronic back pain.

"I don't want to be buying street drugs," Lampkin told CBC News. “I think that I have a legitimate medical condition where I should be getting medication from my doctor."

Heroin Use Reaches 20-year High in U.S.

Limits on opioid prescribing may also be fueling a surge in heroin use in the United States, according to the chief researcher for a United Nations report on worldwide drug use.

"There is really a huge epidemic (of) heroin in the U.S.," Angela Me told Reuters.

According to the U.N. World Drug Report 2016, the number of heroin users in the U.S. reached one million in 2014, the highest in 20 years. Heroin use has increased sharply over the last two years in both North America and Europe.

The increase has coincided with a drop in heroin prices, but Me believes it could also be connected to the development of abuse deterrent formulas for OxyContin and other opioid pain medications, which have made the pills harder to crush and snort.

"This has caused a partial shift from the misuse of these prescription opioids to heroin," Me said.

Pain Care Shouldn’t Be Political Theater

By Richard Oberg, MD, Guest Columnist

The current hysteria over opioid pain medication is, without a doubt, the most unbelievable and difficult situation for patients I've ever seen in my 30 years of practice. With an increasing number of deaths due to overdose, the message has become that opioid medication is the problem. 

Healthy people, including healthy physicians, don't seem to believe chronic pain really exists to the degree that it does. Add in media hysteria with gross misrepresentation of the facts, often-cited CDC propaganda, and you have a recipe for disaster: addiction models applied to chronic pain patients.

Everyone's favorite defense mechanism – projection -- is overused constantly and many healthy people really think if they had chronic pain they'd somehow handle it differently or “beat it” which is nonsense.

Empathy is not a learned skill, nor is it widely prevalent in the population, including the majority of physicians. You feel it every time you see that look of disbelief from anyone, including physicians, regarding your chronic painful illness. Skepticism overrides compassion.  This attitude in the current climate has led to a crisis for patients.

At age 39, before I was diagnosed with psoriatic arthritis and eventually late stage complications of spondylitis and neuropathy, I was a multi-mile runner and very active member of our large hospital staff. Then suddenly every step was like walking on broken glass, aching everywhere with flu-like symptoms, and getting maybe two hours of sleep per night.

I saw multiple colleagues who'd give me a pat on the back and tell me to “hang in there” as I was heading for a meltdown.  Instead of a rheumatologist, I was sent to a psychiatrist.  Even after I got a definitive diagnosis, everyone still just chose to ignore it.

Sound familiar?

RICHARD OBERG, MD

I finally found an “old school” internist, one of the few in our area willing to treat chronic pain, who convinced me to try opioid medication cautiously, despite my reservations.  Like many people, I thought they'd make me fuzzy headed (bad for a diagnostic pathologist spending 8 hours under a microscope), but the opposite happened. Suddenly I was back at a tolerable pain level and able to sleep at night again. I’ll never forget how compassionate he was.

Biologic drugs such as Enbrel, which were new then, helped a lot for maybe 12 years. Over time they can become less effective for many patients. I became severely allergic to Remicade (anaphylactic reaction) and all other biologic/systemic medications also ceased to do anything, including Rituxan, which is for rheumatoid arthritis and B-cell lymphoma. I was desperate to continue working and was only able to with opioid medication.

Opioid Propaganda

So here's our dilemma as pain patients: we have a major federal agency (CDC) peddling “addictionologist” propaganda on a massive scale and investigative journalism no longer exists. The news media is no longer the fourth branch of government, but merely a vehicle for their propaganda.

Our physicians, despite being the highest paid in the world in the most expensive healthcare system in the world, have signed onto this -- not wanting any scrutiny whatsoever from state or federal regulators. They won't script in these “militarized” situations, and are either risk averse or co-dependent (the latter is why they want to drop the pain scale). Most are going along with the CDC because they don't want the extra trouble and have abandoned patient responsibility entirely, going for the low hanging fruit of more routine healthcare issues instead.

We have a supply and demand situation working against us with too few providers, an abundance of chronic pain patients, and pills that aren't as profitable as procedures. This varies from state to state and even within states, but is rapidly spreading. Physicians obviously caused part of the problem by over-prescribing, but they have the money and power, and are now just walking away from it all. There is a deafening silence from physicians, even when they know their patients are being abused.

In many states, like Tennessee where I live, physicians run everything. State officials passed tort reform, so lawyers won't take medical cases anymore (we tried and know firsthand).  Physicians own our state malpractice insurer, State Volunteer Mutual, which brags every year about malpractice premium refunds due to a decreased numbers of lawsuits. It's not because our state has a phenomenal group of physicians, it's just that the bar for a lawsuit is so high (like death of someone young) there are very few of them.

Within relatively few years (partly due to addictionologists like Dr. Andrew Kolodny having an outsized voice at the CDC) the conversation went from the “epidemic” of overdose deaths (which it never really was) to “opioids don't work for chronic pain” -- despite the fact that there are no good studies to support that because they really haven't been done.

They just say it and the news media repeats it, much like Dr. Sanjay Gupta, who stated on CNN’s “Prescription Addiction: Made in the USA” that overdoses were the #1 cause of preventable deaths in the Unites States. 

Sorry Sanjay, not even close. The CDC’s own statistics state that smoking and alcohol are the leading causes, with about 480,000 people dying every year – 25 times higher than the alleged 19,000 dying from prescription opioid medications.

How does this blatant propaganda get on CNN and what makes Sanjay Gupta an expert?

The ridiculous Consumer Reports cover story, The Dangers of Painkillers, also misused information supplied by the CDC. I've had a running email conversation with someone there for over a year asking why the bogus misuse of data - and got no answers of course.

Perhaps one of the most abominable statistical misuses by the CDC is confirmation bias, where they cherry pick data to “confirm” what they want to peddle, while ignoring other data, like the vast majority of pain patients doing well with opioid medication and most not having addiction issues.

Their argument simply doesn't work. In the 1990’s, the first decade of “massive” opioid prescribing that media outlets love to cite, there was no similar increase in complications caused by the number of “highly addictive” pills being prescribed. Then we had the 2008 financial meltdown, society changed, drug addiction became a prominent issue, and suddenly people were dying from too many pills.

Finally, the artificial breakdown of “cancer” pain vs. “non-cancer” pain is complete nonsense and always has been. The final common denominator of pain is pain, and cancer is merely one of many etiologies that can cause it.

Incidentally, the word “cancer” is pretty meaningless, especially to a pathologist like me. Large numbers of physicians and virtually all lay people have little understanding of the pathophysiologic processes pathologists are trained to understand.  Most things called “cancer” aren’t chronically painful and many autoimmune diseases can be much more painful than cancer.

Ironically, as cancer treatments have become better (such as those for breast cancer) and with longer survival times, many cancer patients are developing chronic pain conditions that have nothing to do with their cancer.

Do they get special treatment even if they have a good long-term prognosis?

Richard Oberg, MD, is disabled by psoriatic arthritis and no longer practices medicine. Dr. Oberg receives no funding from pharmaceutical manufacturers. 

Pain News Network invites other readers to share their stories with us.  Send them to:  editor@PainNewsNetwork.org. 

The information in this column should not be considered as professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. It is for informational purposes only and represents the author’s opinions alone. It does not inherently express or reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Pain News Network.