Study Finds Most Drugs Ineffective for Neuropathic Pain

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

A first of its kind study that compared four medications widely used to treat neuropathy found that all four were usually ineffective in treating pain and many patients stopped taking them due to side effects.    

Over 20 million people in the U.S. suffer from neuropathic pain, a tingling, burning or stinging sensation in the hands and feet caused by nerve damage. Neuropathy is often caused by diabetes, chemotherapy or trauma, but in about 25% of cases the cause is unknown and classified as cryptogenic sensory polyneuropathy (CSPN).

There is little guidance for physicians and patients on what drugs to take for CSPN, so researchers at the University of Missouri School of Medicine conducted a “real world” study in which 402 patients with CSPN took one of the four neuropathy medications.

The four drugs studied were nortriptyline (Aventyl), a tricyclic antidepressant; duloxetine (Cymbalta), a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) antidepressant; pregabalin (Lyrica), an anti-seizure drug; and mexiletine (Mexitil), an anti-arrhythmic medication used to treat irregular heartbeats.

Nortriptyline, duloxetine and pregabalin are approved by the FDA for treating neuropathy, while mexiletine is used off-label. None of the drugs were originally developed to treat neuropathic pain.

"As the first study of its kind, we compared these four drugs in a real-life setting to provide physicians with a body of evidence to support the effective management of peripheral neuropathy and to support the need for newer and more effective drugs for neuropathic pain," said lead researcher Richard Barohn, MD, executive vice chancellor for health affairs at the University of Missouri.

After 12 weeks of use, any drug that reduced pain for a patient by at least a 50% was considered effective, a recognized industry standard to define therapy success.. Researchers also kept track of patients who stopped taking a drug and dropped out of the study due to adverse effects.

The study findings, published in JAMA Neurology, can best be described as underwhelming. Patients were far more likely to stop taking a drug than they were to stay on a medication that was helping them.    

Of the four drugs, only nortriptyline was an effective pain reliever for at least 25% of patients. It also had the second-lowest drop-out rate (38%), giving it the highest level of overall utility. Duloxetine had the second-highest efficacy rate (23%) and the lowest drop-out rate (37%).

Pregbalin had the lowest efficacy rate (15%) and the second highest drop-out rate (42%), while mexiletine had the highest drop-out rate (58%) and an efficacy rate of 20 percent.

EFFICACY RATE OF NEUROPATHY DRUGS

SOURCE: JAMA NEUROLOGY

"There was no clearly superior performing drug in the study," Barohn said. "However, of the four medications, nortriptyline and duloxetine performed better when efficacy and dropouts were both considered. Therefore, we recommend that either nortriptyline or duloxetine be considered before the other medications we tested."

While nortriptyline had the highest efficacy rate, it also had the highest rate of adverse events, with over half of patients (56%) reporting side effects such as dry mouth, drowsiness, fatigue and bloating.  

Previous studies have found that duloxetine and pregabalin had higher efficacy rates for neuropathic pain, but Barohn and his colleagues say their research more accurately reflects what patients experience in real life and what physicians encounter in their practice.

“Our findings could affect how these 4 drugs are used by all physicians who treat patients with neuropathy. Findings support duloxetine and nortriptyline as better-performing drug choices in this population with neuropathic pain, suggesting that they should be prescribed before pregabalin or mexiletine are considered. However, this study also supports a finding that all 4 drugs helped improve pain in at least some patients, so each could be tried if others failed,” they concluded.     

There are several other drugs used to treat neuropathy, including gabapentin, venlafaxine and sodium channel inhibitors. Barohn says additional comparative studies should be performed on those drugs. His goal is to build effectiveness data on nearly a dozen drugs for CSPN.

‘Partial Fill’ Rule for Pharmacies Would Harm Pain Patients

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

A retired Nevada pharmacist who lives with chronic back pain is warning that patients will suffer if the Drug Enforcement Administration enacts a rule that allows pharmacists to only partially fill opioid prescriptions.

The DEA is under pressure from Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and other members of Congress to stop “foot-dragging” and finalize a regulation that would allow patients to take home only part of their opioid prescription. They would have to return a second time to get the rest.

“I think it (the DEA partial refills) would have a huge impact on patients who regularly get their pain meds filled. Can you just imagine people already in pain having to go back to their pharmacy again to get the balance? Going once a month is already problematic for many. Twice a month would be inhumane,” Rick Martin said in an email to PNN.

“Pharmacists might not like it either because it would make them have to account for their inventory more often and maybe double the amount of work to fill the same Rx again.”

Warren, along with Sen. Dianne Feinstein, Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, Rep. Kathleen Clark and Rep. Steve Stivers, sent a bipartisan letter to acting DEA Administrator Timothy Shea last week urging him to update the “partial fill” regulation, as required under the 2018 Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act (CARA). 

“DEA has failed to issue its proposed rule, despite assurances in recent years that ‘this proposed rule is a top priority’ for the agency,” the letter says. “Defining ‘partial fill’ and fully implementing Section 702 of CARA will reduce the number of prescription opioids in circulation, a crucial step in addressing the opioid crisis that is devastating communities across the country. DEA’s continuing foot-dragging on this issue puts Americans at risk.”

Warren and her colleagues asked the DEA to provide an update and staff-level briefing on the matter no later than October 20.

Under current rules, the DEA only allows pharmacists to do a partial fill if they don’t have enough medication on hand to completely fill a prescription – something that many patients say is already happening. In a report issued earlier this year, the DEA said the supply of prescription opioids was at its lowest level since 2006.

“Once again, the letter just shows a bunch of busy-body ignorant uneducated senators sticking their nose where it doesn't belong,” said Martin. “They (pharmacists) shouldn't be doing this unless they don't have an adequate amount to fill or unless the patient gives them permission to partial fill.”

The Warren letter claims over half of those who abuse opioid medication obtain it from a friend or family member. The DEA, however, has said less than one percent of opioids that are legally prescribed are diverted.

Illicit fentanyl, heroin and other street drugs are responsible for the vast majority of overdoses. A 2019 study of overdoses in Massachusetts – Warren’s home state – found only 1.3% of overdose victims had an active opioid prescription.  

Doctor Who Lost Medical License Leading Effort to Sue Kolodny

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Pain patients and their supporters are planning to rally Wednesday at Brandeis University in Massachusetts, a protest against Dr. Andrew Kolodny, a senior scientist at Brandeis who co-directs opioid research at the Heller School for Policy and Management.

Kolodny is the founder and Executive Director of Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing (PROP), an influential anti-opioid activist group that has led efforts to reduce opioid prescribing in the U.S. Many patients blame PROP for their poorly treated or untreated pain, as well as increased suicides in the pain community. The so-called “Killer Kolodny Rally” is being organized by Claudia Merandi of the Don’t Punish Pain rally organization.

“If we in the pain community want to make changes, we have a lot of work to do. We have been damaged severely. And Kolodny’s largely responsible,” says Dr. Arnold Feldman, a retired anesthesiologist who is working with Merandi to raise money for a possible class action lawsuit against Kolodny,

As PNN first reported, Kolodny and PROP played influential roles in drafting the CDC’s controversial 2016 opioid prescribing guideline. Kolodny is also a well-paid expert witness in opioid litigation cases.

“Kolodny is enriching himself to a very large degree,” Feldman told PNN. “Every day I am finding weblike connections between Kolodny and pharmaceutical manufacturers.”

Feldman and some patient advocates have claimed — without offering any proof — that Kolodny has benefited financially from promoting addiction treatment drugs like Suboxone.

The allegation led Kolodny to ask for and receive a letter from Indivior, Suboxone’s manufacturer, stating that he does not have a financial interest in the company and has received no payments from it as a consultant, speaker or in any other capacity.    

Nevertheless, Feldman claims that he has evidence of Kolodny’s culpability and will be able to uncover more once a class action lawsuit is filed.  He and Merandi have not been able to find a law firm willing to take the case.

DR. ARNOLD FELDMAN (YOUTUBE IMAGE)

“I’ve got lots of evidence. I’m not going to put it out in public because we’re going to need this in our case,” Feldman said. “Unfortunately, I’m not a stranger to lawyers.”

Medical License Suspended

Feldman has indeed fought and lost a number of legal battles, including an unsuccessful effort to get his medical license back after it was suspended in 2016 by Louisiana’s Board of Medical Examiners. The disciplinary action came after a patient died three years earlier while getting an epidural steroid injection at Feldman’s surgery clinic in Baton Rouge.

Feldman was charged with seven counts of negligence and unprofessional conduct, such as allowing an unlicensed and unsupervised employee to insert an IV into the patient and give him medication. The patient went into cardiac arrest during the procedure and Feldman was unable to revive him. 

“I had a patient who passed away. Not from anything I did. He had a cardiomyopathy and passed away. They tried to get me for that. But they couldn’t because the autopsy said he died from natural causes,” Feldman told PNN.

The state medical board felt otherwise and accused Feldman of a coverup, saying he gave investigators a “quite staggering” amount of false records and testimony about what happened.

“Dr. Feldman failed to adequately monitor the patient, exercised poor management or care of the patient after complications arose, and all of his resuscitation attempts were contributing factors to the patient’s death,” the board said in its ruling.

Feldman’s clinic had previously been cited in 2010, 2011 and 2013 for not following safety standards, putting patients in “immediate jeopardy” of injury and death.

Investigators also said Feldman allowed his employees to forge his signature and sign opioid prescriptions, and that he gave pre-signed prescriptions to patients without seeing them.

Feldman says he was denied due process by the medical board and appealed his suspension twice in court, but it was upheld both times.

“Dr. Feldman failed to adequately monitor the patient, exercised poor management or care of the patient after complications arose, and all of his resuscitation attempts were contributing factors to the patient’s death.”

— Louisiana Board of Medical Examiners

Because of the disciplinary action in Louisiana, Feldman’s medical licenses were also suspended in California, Alabama and Mississippi. Feldman had previously been reprimanded and put on probation by Mississippi’s medical board in 2000 after he “violated numerous laws and regulations” involving the prescribing, dispensing and administration of controlled substances.

In 2017, the Drug Enforcement Administration effectively ended Feldman’s career by revoking his DEA license to prescribe opioids and other controlled substances.   

No longer able to practice medicine, Feldman lost his home, car and clinic, and for a time lived in a motor-home, according to testimony he gave at a legislative hearing. He now lives in Florida. Feldman says he could have his medical license reinstated in Louisiana, but it would cost $460,000 that he doesn’t have.

‘I Know Pain Management Better Than Anyone’

Although he hasn’t practiced medicine in years, Feldman still considers himself an expert in pain management because he “learned skills that nobody else had.”

“I know this business, meaning pain management, better than anyone living. I’m a surgeon. I’ve done disc surgery. I’ve done pain pumps, (spinal cord) stimulators, and 100-thousand nerve blocks. I know what’s going on,” he said. “Most of these pain conditions are incurable, and I’ll tell you what, half of them are created by the medical profession.”

Since his forced retirement, Feldman has become something of a gadfly in the pain and legal communities, joining with another doctor whose medical license was revoked in filing a $28,000 trillion lawsuit against the Federation of State Medical Boards, the American Medical Association and other entities.

Feldman and Merandi have established a non-profit called The Doctor Patient Forum to advocate for doctors in legal jeopardy and pain patients who can’t get proper treatment. “He is brilliant. We work well together,” says Merandi.

The two have raised nearly $12,000 for the lawsuit against Kolodny, with most of the money coming in small donations from pain patients who know little or nothing about Feldman or how the money will be spent. 

“It’s in a bank account. I don’t touch it. I haven’t taken a dime. Nor will I ever. When we have enough money and find a law firm, that’s where the money will go,” he promised. 

“The only way to bring awareness to this is with litigation,” Merandi said in a recent radio interview. “We believe we have to bring Andrew Kolodny before a court of law. We have to bring the others before a court of law. We need an investigation done and that costs money.”

Legal experts say attorneys in class action lawsuits are typically not paid for their services and expenses unless they prevail in court. All payments have to be approved by a judge, with the money coming from the award or settlement — not the plaintiffs. Legitimate attorneys will not ask for upfront money in a class action case, according to consumer advocate Ron Burley.

Patient Advocate Who Drew Attention to Pharmacy Discrimination Dies

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

A patient advocate in California who fought breast cancer and helped draw attention to the discrimination often faced by pain patients at pharmacies has died. April Doyle passed away last month after a 12-year battle with metastatic breast cancer. She was only 42-years old.    

In April 2019, Doyle posted a tearful video on Facebook and Twitter after a Rite Aid pharmacist refused to fill her prescription for Norco, an opioid medication she took for cancer pain. At the time, her Stage 4 breast cancer had metastasized into her lungs, spine and hip. 

“I have to take 20 pills a day just to stay alive,” Doyle said in the video, which soon went viral. “Every time I take my pain pill prescription there, they give me the runaround. They don’t have enough in stock or they need me to come back tomorrow because they can’t fill it today. Or something stupid. It’s always something and it’s always some stupid excuse.”

Doyle’s video struck a chord with pain patients around the country, who often have trouble getting their opioid prescriptions filled. The publicity also led to apologies from a Rite Aid vice-president, the store manager and the pharmacist who refused to fill her prescription.

Doyle said the pharmacist told her he was worried about being fined or even losing his job if he filled her prescription, even though cancer pain is exempt from opioid prescribing guidelines. 

“It’s astonishing the reaction it has gotten. I had no idea this was so common. It’s actually kind of sad how common it is,” Doyle told PNN at the time. “It really struck a nerve with what’s apparently a big problem.”

Doyle wrote several articles about breast cancer that were posted online and her own blog. In her final post on AdvancedBreastCancer.net, Doyle shared her feelings and worries about her young son while she was sick at home from chemotherapy.

“He’s such an amazing boy and it isn’t fair that he has to grow up with a sick mother. If I’m even around for much more of his growing up. In my heart, I know this is what I’m really mourning,” she wrote.

“Cancer is slowly taking things away from me. I hate, hate, that I can’t do something myself. The stubbornness in me is resisting yet it comes out a waterfall of tears. Something so mediocre or dumb to someone else, but it’s an example of what my life has become and how I no longer can dictate what I can or cannot do.”

“April was a dedicated advocate in the metastatic breast cancer community. She told her story with authenticity and inspired so many young women and men living with the disease. She had a way of bringing people together and supporting people in all stages of breast cancer,” Doyle’s obituary in the Visalia Times said.

“She never let her disease define her. She never backed down from adversity and always stood forefront. April fought the stigma and stood up for patient rights. She leaves a legacy in the breast cancer community that will inspire people forever.”

Doyle leaves behind her 9-year old son, Colin. Her family asks that donations in her honor be made to METAvivor, a non-profit that supports breast cancer research.

Most Patients Satisfied With Telehealth, But Some Exploited for Healthcare Fraud

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Telehealth has been a godsend for pain sufferers during the coronarvirus pandemic, with many patients discovering the ease and convenience of visiting with their doctors online or over the telephone. Some have even been able to get prescriptions written for opioid medication without an initial face-to-face meeting with their doctors – thanks to a DEA decision to relax some of the rules about prescribing controlled substances.  

Unfortunately, some providers are taking advantage of patients — and the pandemic — by filing billions of dollars in false medical claims.

Saving Time and Money

Most patients who use telehealth – also known as telemedicine – to connect with pain management specialists were highly satisfied with their experience, according to a new study presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Anesthesiologists.

Last summer, researchers at UCLA’s Comprehensive Pain Center began giving patients the option of in-office visits or remote appointments via telehealth. Nearly 1,400 patients chose telehealth, resulting in nearly 3,000 virtual appointments before and during the pandemic, from August, 2019 to June, 2020.

“This era of contactless interactions and social distancing has really accelerated the adoption of telemedicine, but even before the pandemic, patient satisfaction was consistently high,” said lead author Laleh Jalilian, MD, an anesthesiologist at the Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center in Los Angeles.

“Patients who are being evaluated for new conditions may be better off having office visits initially. But once patients establish a relationship with providers, follow-up visits can occur efficiently with telemedicine, while maintaining patient rapport and quality outcomes. We believe 50 percent of our visits could be conducted via telemedicine.”

Asked about their experiences with telehealth, 92 percent of patients said they were satisfied. Many said they were happy to avoid the lengthy commutes and time spent in Los Angeles area traffic. On average, patients saved 69 minutes in traffic per visit and $22 in gas and parking fees.

For telehealth to be sustainable in a post-pandemic world, Jalilian says insurers should consider expanding reimbursement for providers to take into account the additional work and technology needed for telehealth visits. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has waived many of the limits on telehealth visits during the pandemic and some private insurers have followed suit.

“Now that telemedicine is more widespread, it may become a valued part of care delivery in chronic pain practices,” said Jalilian. “Clearly many patients benefitted from remote consultations and follow-up appointments using telemedicine. We hope it will encourage policymakers and insurance providers to continue to support these platforms and inspire more innovation in this developing field of research and patient care.”

Telehealth Fraud Takedown

But as demand has grown for telehealth services, federal prosecutors say hundreds of healthcare providers have exploited the situation. In what’s being called the largest healthcare fraud and enforcement action in Department of Justice history, criminal charges were recently filed against 345 doctors, nurses and other providers for submitting over $6 billion in false and fraudulent claims to Medicare, Medicaid and private insurers. Some of the false claims were for COVID-19 testing.

The fraud charges involve more than $4.5 billion connected to telemedicine, $845 million involving substance abuse treatment, and $806 million connected to illegal opioid distribution.

“This nationwide enforcement operation is historic in both its size and scope, alleging billions of dollars in healthcare fraud across the country,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Brian Rabbitt.  “These cases hold accountable those medical professionals and others who have exploited health care benefit programs and patients for personal gain.” 

Prosecutors say telemedicine executives allegedly paid kickbacks to doctors and nurse practitioners to order unnecessary medical equipment, genetic and other diagnostic testing, and pain medications, either without any interaction with patients or after a brief telephone conversation with patients they had never met or seen. Medical equipment companies, genetic testing labs and pharmacies then purchased the orders in exchange for illegal kickbacks and bribes.

In addition to those charges, CMS announced that it had taken administrative action against 256 healthcare providers, revoking their Medicare billing privileges because of their involvement in telemedicine schemes. 

“Telemedicine can foster efficient, high-quality care when practiced appropriately and lawfully.  Unfortunately, bad actors attempt to abuse telemedicine services and leverage aggressive marketing techniques to mislead beneficiaries about their health care needs and bill the government for illegitimate services,” said HHS Deputy Inspector General Gary Cantrell. 

The charges against substance abuse treatment facilities -- known as “sober homes” – mostly involve illegal payments to patient recruiters for referring scores of patients to treatment facilities. The patients were then subjected to medically unnecessary drug testing – often billing thousands of dollars for a single test – and therapy sessions that were often not provided.

Some sober homes also allegedly prescribed medically unnecessary controlled substances and other medications to patients to entice them to stay at the facility.  Prosecutors say the patients were then often discharged and admitted to other treatment facilities, or referred to other labs and clinics, in exchange for more kickbacks.

Opioid Guidelines Leave Some Surgery Patients in Pain

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

In recent years, many U.S. hospitals have adopted policies that reduce or eliminate the use of opioids during and after surgery.

Patients at Houston Methodist Hospital, for example, are getting acetaminophen (Tylenol) for post-operative pain after hernia repairs and other minimally invasive surgeries. And dozens of hospitals in Michigan have adopted guidelines for post-operative pain that have significantly reduced the use of opioids.

But a new study presented at the annual meeting of the American College of Surgeons suggests that policies that discourage the use of opioids for post-operative pain may be neglecting patients that need opioids for better pain control.

“The key findings of our study are that we were able to successfully reduce how many opioids we were prescribing for patients after operations using evidence-based guidelines,” said lead author Cornelius Thiels, DO, a surgical oncology fellow at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and a researcher at the Mayo Clinic.

“However, the other finding of our research is that there’s still additional room to improve in terms of making sure all patients after surgery have their pain well controlled.”

The researchers evaluated 138 patients who had one of 12 elective surgeries after the Mayo Clinic adopted guidelines in 2018 that call for “multimodal pain control,” a combination of opioids with non-opioid pain relievers such as ibuprofen, naproxen and acetaminophen. Those patients were compared with 603 patients who had the same procedures before the guidelines, when opioids were used more widely.

While most patients in the post-guideline group were satisfied with their pain control after discharge, a significant number were not.

In telephone surveys conducted about four weeks after discharge, the percentage of patients in the post-guideline group who were dissatisfied with their pain control was more than double that of the pre-guideline group (9.4% vs. 4.2%). The percentage who said they were not prescribed enough pain medication was also higher (12.5% vs. 4.9%).

“There is a small subset of patients who we’re not optimally managing yet, and this study confirmed that this is a small number,” Thiels said. “However, I think that’s a critically important subset of patients.”

Thiel says about half of patients need opioid medication after major surgeries, and doctors need to do a better job identifying who they are.

“Our goal is to give them the exact right amount so that we limit the number of un-used opioids in our community while also making sure we don’t reduce it down too far and then leave them in pain,” he said. “The right answer may be more non-opioid based pain medications, better patient education and setting of expectations, or in some cases patients may actually require slightly more opioid medications, and that is OK.”  

Opioid addiction is actually rare after surgery.  A large 2016 Canadian study found only 0.4% of older adults were still taking opioids a year after major elective surgery.  Another large study in the British Medical Journal found only 0.2% of patients who were prescribed opioids for post-surgical pain were later diagnosed with opioid dependence, abuse or had a non-fatal overdose.

Pre-Existing Conditions Deserve Affordable Treatment

By Dr. Lynn Webster, PNN Columnist

The National Institutes of Health reports that about 10 percent of Americans experience a substance use disorder (SUD) at some point in their lives. Most of those who suffer from an SUD receive no treatment.

About twice as many Americans – 20 percent -- have chronic pain. Many of them also cannot find adequate treatment or even a provider willing to treat them. 

Making treatment accessible for both of these conditions -- which are defined as pre-existing for insurance purposes -- is always a topic of concern. These days, it is of paramount concern that access to treatment is available. And it requires us to take action.

We’re All at Risk for Pain and Drug Abuse

Poverty and hopelessness are risk factors for drug abuse, even though not everyone who is economically challenged develops an SUD. Unfortunately, prevention and treatment programs for SUDs are less available to those who cannot pay for them and who most need them.

Anyone can suffer from chronic pain, but even those with resources may not have access to adequate pain management.

My concern is more than theoretical. It is personal. I have friends, former patients and family members who suffer from SUDs. If the Affordable Care Act (ACA) — widely known as Obamacare — ends and we lose coverage of pre-existing conditions, I fear they will be abandoned in exactly the same way as people in pain have been abandoned ever since the CDC issued its 2016 opioid prescribing guideline.

In recent years, I have received hundreds of emails and calls from people in pain. Their medications have been tapered and they don't know where to turn for help. Untreated chronic pain, as well as untreated SUDs, can result in ruinous consequences: disability, destitution, isolation, poverty and suicide.

We need to help healthcare providers find more effective ways to treat their patients. The Centers of Excellence in Pain Education (CoEPEs) program was created to teach healthcare professionals about pain and its treatment. Since this is something most doctors do not study adequately during medical school, it's important to have continuing medical education opportunities to learn about the stigma associated with pain treatment and substance abuse disorders.

Abolishing ACA Could Have Devastating Consequences

The current administration has appealed to the Supreme Court to abolish the ACA. President Trump has said that Obamacare "must fall." Given the fact that we're in the middle of a pandemic and millions of people are unemployed and may have lost access to employer-sponsored healthcare, the timing seems terrible.  

But even without a pandemic, reversing the ACA would be devastating for millions of Americans who have an SUD or chronic pain. President Trump signed an executive order on September 24 that claims to protect people with pre-existing conditions. However, experts dispute whether his executive order can actually do what it promises.

Regardless, eliminating the ACA will likely allow insurance companies to charge higher rates for people with pre-existing conditions. This would essentially render treatment for chronic pain and SUD unaffordable for many people, leading to an increase of the terrible consequences mentioned above. And, of course, SUDs and chronic pain are only two of the pre-existing conditions that would no longer be protected. 

It is time for everyone to understand the consequences that losing the ACA may have for their community, family, friends and themselves. There is still time to be heard, but you have to act quickly. Click here to find your federal, state, and local elected officials and express your views.  

Let us also send healing thoughts and prayers to President Trump, the First Lady and everyone else infected with COVID-19.

Lynn R. Webster, MD, is a vice president of scientific affairs for PRA Health Sciences and consults with the pharmaceutical industry. He is author of the award-winning book The Painful Truth, and co-producer of the documentary It Hurts Until You Die. Opinions expressed here are those of the author alone and do not reflect the views or policy of PRA Health Sciences. You can find Lynn on Twitter: @LynnRWebsterMD. 

FDA Requires Stronger Warning Labels for Benzodiazepines

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is ordering drug manufacturers to update warning labels for benzodiazepines to strongly caution patients and providers about the risk of abuse, addiction, dependence and withdrawal. The agency said current warning labels are inadequate about the risks associated with anti-anxiety medications such as Xanax and Valium, even when they are taken as prescribed.

Benzodiazepines are generally used to treat anxiety, insomnia, seizures and social phobia, and they were once commonly prescribed to chronic pain patients to reduce anxiety and help them sleep. In recent years, many pain patients were taken off the drugs because they are considered risky when taken with opioid medication.

“While benzodiazepines are important therapies for many Americans, they are also commonly abused and misused, often together with opioid pain relievers and other medicines, alcohol and illicit drugs,” said FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn, MD. “We are taking measures and requiring new labeling information to help health care professionals and patients better understand that while benzodiazepines have many treatment benefits, they also carry with them an increased risk of abuse, misuse, addiction and dependence.”

In 2019, an estimated 92 million benzodiazepine prescriptions were dispensed by U.S. pharmacies, with alprazolam (Xanax) being the most common, followed by clonazepam (Klonopin) and lorazepam (Ativan).

The FDA said it reviewed post-marketing databases and its Adverse Events Reporting System, and found that benzodiazepines were often prescribed for long periods. In 2018, about half of patients prescribed the drugs received them for two months or more, even though most benzodiazepines are only recommended for short-term use. Physical dependence can occur after taking benzodiazepines for several days or weeks, according to the FDA.

“They are also widely abused and misused, often together with alcohol, prescription opioids, and illicit drugs, which worsen the risks of serious problems. We also found that some patients have had serious withdrawal reactions after benzodiazepines were stopped suddenly or the dose was reduced too quickly. Some patients experienced withdrawal symptoms lasting many months,” the agency said.

The FDA previously warned about the risks of combining benzodiazepines with opioids in 2016. Opioids and benzodiazepines are both central nervous system depressants that can cause sleepiness, respiratory depression, coma and death. In 2016, the number of emergency department visits due to non-medical use of benzodiazepines was higher than the number of ER visits for non-medical use of prescription opioids.

Fatal overdoses involving benzodiazepines increased from 1,298 deaths in 2010 to 11,537 deaths in 2017. The vast majority of those overdoses also involved other substances.

My Pain Doctor Abandoned Me, But I'm Not Going Away Quietly

By CindyLee Calaluca, Guest Columnist

Recently I was terminated by my pain management physician without notice and with no plan for continued care. Why? I complained to the physician that I did not appreciate getting no call back when I repeatedly contacted his practice — over an 8-day period — to report that my chronic pain now had a severe acute component to it.

The acute problem is caused by a severe deep vein thrombosis, extending from the groin to the toes in my left leg – the result of a surgical wound from a toe amputation tearing open from severe swelling. Additionally, an old pressure ulcer had abscessed. The acute pain I am experiencing is because of an overlap with my poorly controlled chronic pain, thanks to the CDC guideline for prescribing opioid medication.

All I can do now, because of the pain, is lay in bed and force myself to sleep to cope with the pain. I am totally incapacitated and unable to do daily activities independently. I am 70 years old, a widow, and my only living relative is a 69-year-old brother who lives 2,000 miles from me.

The physician responded to me inappropriately. He told me he gets 3,000 phone calls a day and saw no reason to respond me, because there was nothing he was going to do about my pain. Furthermore, he had an arrogant demeanor and feels he isn't required to call me. I get an appointment once a month with him and that's where his responsibility for my care ends, he said.

Naturally, that opened the door wide open to abandonment and neglect of a patient. His practice has no after-hour or weekend coverage beyond an answering service.

Before he walked out on me, he insulted my career experience, called me uneducated, and said I didn't know what I was talking about regarding health care or laws.

It is a shame that in his superiority complex, he forgot, if he ever knew, my career or educational background. You see, I am an adult and geriatric nurse practitioner who holds a doctorate in nursing practice with 55 years of clinical experience, along with 20 years of simultaneous healthcare administration. That physician is about to find out how "uneducated, stupid and wrong" I actually am.

That's the story behind my being abandoned and put in my place for complaining. I tried to be nice and have an adult conversation with this man. What a shame his child showed up!

I completely understand the problems created when patients arbitrarily lose their providers without adequate and proper notice. I live in a community of less than 500 people. The nearest pain management practice that uses oral medication is 45 miles away. The next one is two and a half hours away. Then there's University of Alabama Medical Center, which is six hours away. Right, I'll just pop into the pain center tomorrow. Like that's happening.

I have had it with all the buck passing by politicians, law enforcement agents, and the CDC making doctors too afraid to practice pain management correctly. Putting a sign in the lobby stating that under no circumstance does the practice treat pain is not correct medical intervention. In fact, since pain is a symptom of illness and that the body is imperiled, it is turning a blind eye to abandonment.

I am no longer going to be a good patient and not respect myself. I refuse to play the game anymore. Since I am dying, I am not going quietly into the night. I am going to advocate and do so loudly, visibly and boldly. I will advocate for patients one last time.

CindyLee Calaluca lives in Alabama. Pain News Network invites other readers to share their stories with us. Send them to editor@painnewsnetwork.org.

After Brief Decline, ‘Exponential Trajectory’ of U.S. Overdose Crisis Resumes

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

A brief decline in fatal overdoses in 2018 was just a blip in the trajectory of a 40-year pattern of rising drug deaths in the United States, according to a new study published in the journal Addiction.

Researchers at the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health analyzed over a million overdose deaths in the U.S. between 1979 and 2019 – and developed a startling chart that shows an exponential curve in overdoses that continues to rise virtually unchecked. The number of deaths has doubled every 10.7 years.   

"The U.S. has not bent the curve on the drug overdose epidemic," said lead author Hawre Jalal, MD, an assistant professor of health policy and management at Pitt Public Health. "We are concerned that policymakers may have interpreted the one-year downturn in 2018 as evidence for an especially effective national response or the start of a long-term trend. Unfortunately, that isn't supported by the data."

PITT PUBLIC HEALTH

Overdose deaths fell about 4% in 2018, which public health officials attributed to a decline in deaths involving prescription opioids and heroin. However, overdoses began rising again in 2019 and preliminary data for 2020 suggests the upward trajectory has resumed.    

Jalal and co-author Donald Burke, MD, say the 2018 decline in overdoses was largely caused by a reduced supply of carfentanil, an illicit drug and potent analogue of fentanyl that is 10,000 times more powerful than morphine.

China added carfentanil to its list of controlled substances in 2017 and began shutting down illicit drug factories that produced it. The U.S. supply of carfentanil soon began to dry up and law enforcement seizures of the drug fell dramatically in five states -- Ohio, Florida, Pennsylvania, Kentucky and Michigan. It was the “sudden rise and then fall of carfentanil availability” that led to the drop in overdoses, researchers found.

"We all celebrated when the overdose death rate dropped, but it was premature," said Burke, former dean of Pitt Public Health and a professor in the Department of Epidemiology. "When policymakers believe a problem is solved, history has shown that funding is reprioritized to other efforts. The drug overdose epidemic is not solved. It continues to track along an ever-rising curve, with deaths doubling nearly every decade. We must address the root causes of this epidemic."

Jalal calls the U.S. overdose crisis an “entangled epidemic” that’s been fueled by multiple drugs, including prescription opioids, but is now largely caused by illicit fentanyl.

“There is a force that keeps overdose deaths on an exponential trajectory. This is in spite of policies that have been trying to bend the curve,” Jalal told PNN. “The main problem is that we don’t know why it keeps tracking an exponential trajectory. I think we should do everything we can to bend the curve, but the policies that we’ve used so far have been more targeted toward drugs that can be modified easily. We can target prescription opioids and we can increase the use of naloxone and methadone, but I think we also have to invest in understanding what’s driving people to use drugs. That’s a major problem that we still don’t have an answer for.”

Jalal says lack of economic opportunity and social isolation — so-called “deaths of despair” — may be partly responsible for the overdose crisis, but more research is needed into the underlying causes. As for possible solutions, he’s as stumped as anyone.

“I wish I knew. I truly wish,” Jalal said. “I think we have to pay attention to what’s driving this whole epidemic. Without understanding it, we are basically targeting our policies toward whatever we think might work or think we have control over. We’re not targeting why people use drugs or what’s causing people to die from drugs.”

A recent study by the CDC found that nearly 85% of overdose deaths in the first six months of 2019 involved illicit fentanyl, often taken in combination with other drugs. About 20% of overdoses were linked to prescription opioids.

The CDC study did not determine whether the opioid medication was obtained legally, or if it was diverted, stolen or bought on the street. Previous research in Massachusetts and British Columbia found that only about 2% of fatal overdoses involved a legitimate prescription for opioids.

Over 75% of MS Patients Face Financial Hardship

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Over 75% of American adults with multiple sclerosis face financial toxicity or hardship that has forced them to cut spending on food, clothing and housing. Many have gone into debt or filed for bankruptcy, and over a third have delayed or stopped filling prescriptions because they can’t afford them.

The findings come from a survey of 243 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients conducted by the Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute. The study is the first of its kind to evaluate how financial hardship is forcing MS patients to forego treatment and make drastic changes in their lifestyles and spending.

In recent years, the cost of prescriptions for many disease-modifying MS drugs has nearly tripled to about $76,000 a year. While insurance pays for most of it, many patients are overwhelmed by deductibles and other out-of-pocket expenses. The lifetime cost of treating MS in the United States is estimated at over $4 million per patient.

“Over the last 20 years, higher out-of-pocket costs for advanced imaging tests and increased cost sharing have caused the financial burdens on MS patients to escalate. Among medically bankrupt families, MS is associated with the highest total out of-pocket expenditures exceeding those of cancer patients,” said lead author Gelareh Sadigh, MD, an assistant radiology professor at Emory University School of Medicine.

“Our study results demonstrate the high prevalence of financial toxicity for MS patients and the resulting decisions patients make that impact their health care and lifestyle.”

More Debt, Less Spending

The findings, published in the Multiple Sclerosis Journal, show that over half of MS patients (56%) reported decreases in their income due to disability, unemployment or retirement. To make ends meet, many cut spending on food and clothing (35%) and leisure activities (50%) or withdrew money from their savings (40%) and retirement accounts (15%). Others went into debt by borrowing money (19%) or charging their credit cards (30%).

Over a third of MS patients decided to forego some type of medical care or treatment, such as not filling a prescription (16%), skipping doses (13.5%) or stopped taking medication (13%).

“These data underscore the need for shared decision-making and an awareness of patient financial strain when planning treatment strategies,” said co-author and Neiman Institute researcher Richard Duszak, MD, a professor and vice chair for health policy at Emory University. “In addition to the impact on adherence, financial toxicity was associated with significantly lower physical health-related quality of life, demonstrating the broad consequences of treatment costs for many MS patients.”

MS is a chronic and progressive disease that attacks the body’s central nervous system, causing pain, numbness, difficulty walking, paralysis, loss of vision and fatigue. Disease modifying therapy (DMT) reduces the frequency and severity of MS flare-ups, but many patients can’t afford the drugs.

A 2019 survey by the National Multiple Sclerosis Society found that 40% of MS patients who take a DMT drug altered or stopped taking their medication due to the high cost. According to Healthcare Bluebook, a 30-day supply of a brand name DMT like Gilenya costs about $8,845, or over $106,000 a year.

Criticism of the high cost of MS drugs is growing. Last year when the FDA approved a new MS medication called Vumerity, drug maker Biogen set its wholesale price at $88,000 a year. That brought a rebuke from the National MS Society, which released a statement that accused Biogen of price gouging.

FDA Targets Online Pharmacies for Selling Opioids

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

The Food and Drug Administration is once again playing whack-a-mole with illegal online pharmacies, warning 17 website operators to stop selling unapproved or misbranded opioid medications to U.S. consumers, including some drugs offered for sale without a prescription.

In recent years, the FDA has sent hundreds of warning letters to online pharmacies for illegally selling opioids and other controlled substances. Many of the websites are located overseas and outside U.S. jurisdiction or they shut down and soon reappear under new domain names.

According to the Alliance for Safe Online Pharmacies, there are over 30,000 online pharmacies operating worldwide, with 20 new illegal pharmacy websites being launched every day.

“Those who illegally sell opioids online put consumers at risk and undermine the significant strides we have made to combat the opioid crisis,” said Donald Ashley, director of the Office of Compliance in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. “We remain committed to using all available tools to stop the illegal sale of opioids online to help protect consumers from these potentially dangerous products.”

The 17 warning letters were issued late last month. Most of the online pharmacies appear to have been shut down or blocked, although some are still operating.

RxEasyMeds, for example, continues to sell an opioid medication called “Nalbin” that is “used to treat moderate to severe pain associated with acute and chronic medical disorders.”

Nalbin is produced by a drug company based in Islamabad, Pakistan called Global Pharmaceuticals.

The FDA warning letter to RxEasyMeds – which is located in China -- says Nalbin is not approved for sale in the U.S. and does not have an adequate warning label.  

“Unapproved new drugs do not have the same assurance of safety and effectiveness as those drugs subject to FDA oversight, and drugs that have circumvented regulatory safeguards may be contaminated, counterfeit, contain varying amounts of active ingredients, or contain different ingredients altogether,” the FDA letter warns. “Accordingly, FDA requests that you immediately cease offering violative drugs for sale to U.S. consumers.  This is critical to shielding the American public from harm.”

In addition to Nalbin, RxEasyMeds advertises codeine, morphine, tramadol, oxycodone and other controlled substances, which are all apparently available without a prescription.

In June, the FDA launched a pilot program to put more teeth into efforts to stop the illegal sale of opioids online. Under the program, the FDA will notify three internet registries when a warning letter is sent to an online pharmacy. The registries could then block or suspend the website domains, which would effectively take them offline.

Study Finds Acetaminophen Makes People More Likely to Take Risks

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

We’ve learned some weird things about acetaminophen in recent years. The pain reliever not only helps treat headaches and fevers; it also appears to dull human emotions and have other psychological effects.

A new study at The Ohio State University suggests that acetaminophen could even make you more likely to go sky diving or bungee jumping off a tall bridge.

"Acetaminophen seems to make people feel less negative emotion when they consider risky activities - they just don't feel as scared," says co-author Baldwin Way, PhD, an associate professor of psychology at OSU.

Way and his colleagues enrolled 189 college students in the study, giving them either 1,000 mg of acetaminophen (the recommended dose for a headache) or a placebo that looked the same. Participants were then asked to rate on a scale of 1 to 7 how risky they thought various activities would be.

Students who took acetaminophen were more likely to rate bungee jumping, taking a skydiving class, and walking home late at night in an unsafe part of town as less risky than those who took the placebo. They were also less likely to view speaking up about an unpopular issue at work and playing in a high-stakes poker game as risky.

In short, the study found that acetaminophen makes people more likely to take risks, which is not inconsequential when you consider that about 50 million Americans take acetaminophen every week. The pain reliever is the active ingredient in Tylenol, Excedrin and hundreds of other pain medications, as well as cough, cold and flu remedies.

The OSU study, published in the journal Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, was funded by a $500,000 grant from the National Science Foundation, a federal agency. It adds to a growing body of research that found acetaminophen and other over-the-counter pain relievers have psychological effects on humans.

“With nearly 25 percent of the population in the U.S. taking acetaminophen each week, reduced risk perceptions and increased risk-taking could have important effects on society,” said Way. "We really need more research on the effects of acetaminophen and other over-the-counter drugs on the choices and risks we take.”

Burst Balloons

To test their theory, OSU researchers conducted an experiment to see if volunteers would take more risks while inflating a virtual balloon on a computer screen. Participants clicked a button on a computer to inflate the balloon, earning virtual money as a reward each time they did.

"As you're pumping the balloon, it is getting bigger and bigger on your computer screen, and you're earning more money with each pump," Way explained. "But as it gets bigger you have this decision to make: Should I keep pumping and see if I can make more money, knowing that if it bursts, I lose the money I had made with that balloon?"

People who took acetaminophen were more likely to keep on pumping and had more burst balloons.

"If you're risk-averse, you may pump a few times and then decide to cash out because you don't want the balloon to burst and lose your money," said Way. "But for those who are on acetaminophen, as the balloon gets bigger, we believe they have less anxiety and less negative emotion about how big the balloon is getting and the possibility of it bursting."

Previous research at OSU found that acetaminophen seems to dampen human emotions. Student volunteers who took acetaminophen had fewer emotional highs and lows, and felt less empathy for the physical and emotional pain of others. Other studies have linked acetaminophen to hyperactivity and behavior problems in children.

It’s not just acetaminophen. A 2018 review of studies found that ibuprofen and other over-the-counter pain relievers can also dull your emotions and cognitive senses.

A recent study of calls to U.S. poison control centers found a significant increase in suicide calls involving acetaminophen, ibuprofen and other OTC analgesics.

Excessive use of acetaminophen -- also known as paracetamol – can lead to liver, kidney, heart and blood pressure problems. Acetaminophen overdoses are involved in about 500 deaths and over 50,000 emergency room visits in the U.S. annually.

DEA Proposes Cuts in Opioid Supply for Fifth Consecutive Year

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

For the fifth year in a row, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration is proposing significant cuts in the supply of hydrocodone, oxycodone and several other opioid pain medications classified as Schedule II controlled substances.

The cuts are partly based on a prediction by the Food and Drug Administration that medical need for the drugs will decline by over a third in 2021.

In a notice published Tuesday in the Federal Register, the DEA proposes to reduce production quotas for hydrocodone by 9 percent and oxycodone by 13 percent in 2021. The supply of hydromorphone would be reduced by nearly 20% and fentanyl by 29% next year.  

The DEA first proposed cuts in the supply of opioids during the Obama administration and the trend has accelerated under President Trump. If approved, the 2021 production quotas would amount to a 53% reduction in the supply of both hydrocodone and oxycodone since 2017.

DEA consulted with the FDA, CDC and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) before making its recommendations. The key analysis came from the FDA, which provides DEA with annual estimates of medical usage for controlled substances like opioids.

“FDA's predicted levels of medical need for the United States was expected to decline on average 36.52 percent for calendar year 2021. These declines were expected to occur across a variety of schedule II opioids including fentanyl, hydrocodone, hydromorphone, codeine, and morphine,” the DEA said.

The FDA’s analysis, however, came before COVID-19 infections became widespread in the United States. That led to an increase in demand for injectable opioids used to treat seriously ill coronavirus patients on ventilators.

Faced with growing shortages of those drugs, the DEA issued an emergency order in April raising production quotas for injectable pain medications. Many of those drugs, such as injectable fentanyl and hydromorphone, are still listed on an FDA database of drug shortages.     

DEA said its production quotas for 2021 reflect an “anticipated increase in demand for opioids used to treat patients with COVID-19.”

“Despite this public health emergency, DEA remains focused on the challenges presented by opioid addiction and its effect on the health and wellbeing of the millions of Americans and their families who have become dependent upon or addicted to them. The potential for addiction and misuse exists in every community and remains a pressing health issue with significant social and economic implications,” the agency said.

As PNN has reported, prescription opioids play only a small role in the U.S. opioid epidemic. A new CDC report estimates that nearly 85% of drug overdoses in the first six months of 2019 involved illicit fentanyl, heroin and other street drugs. Prescription opioids were linked to about 20% of overdoses.

In addition to reducing the supply of opioids, the DEA is proposing a significant cut in the production quota for marijuana, which is still classified as a Schedule I controlled substance. To accommodate increased demand for marijuana research, the DEA raised the 2020 quota for marijuana to 3,200 kilograms. Those gains would be reversed in 2021, with production quotas for marijuana and marijuana extracts being reduced to 1,700 kilograms.

Public comments will be accepted on the DEA’s proposed production quotas until October 1, 2020. Comments can be made by clicking here.

Nearly 85% of U.S. Overdose Deaths Linked to Street Drugs

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

A new report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows that the vast majority of drug overdose deaths in the United States involve illicit fentanyl and other street drugs.  

The study, reported in the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, analyzed data from 24 states and the District of Columbia enrolled in the State Unintentional Drug Overdose Reporting System (SUDORS) from January to June, 2019. SUDORS captures detailed information from toxicology reports and death scene investigations, and is considered more reliable than overdose data gathered from death certificates.

Among the 16,236 overdose deaths reported by SUDOR during the study period, illicitly manufactured fentanyl (IMF), heroin, cocaine or methamphetamine were involved 83.8% of deaths, either alone or in combination with other drugs. Nearly half of those deaths involved two or more illicit drugs.

About one in five overdoses involved prescription opioids such as hydrocodone, oxycodone, morphine and buprenorphine. The study did not indicate whether the medication was obtained legally or if it was borrowed, stolen or purchased illicitly. What is clear, however, is that street drugs are the primary driver of the U.S. overdose crisis.

% RATE OF DRUGS INVOLVED IN FATAL OVERDOSES (JAN-JUNE, 2019)

SOURCE: CDC

“The finding of this report that nearly 85% of overdose deaths involved IMFs, heroin, cocaine, or methamphetamine reflects rapid and continuing increases in the supply of IMFs and methamphetamine, coupled with illicit co-use of opioids and stimulants,” researchers reported.

More than two thirds (68.5%) of overdose victims were male, and over half (53.3%) were 25 to 44 years of age; demographics that don’t fit the profile of most chronic pain patients, who are generally older and female.

NBER Report Blames Rx Opioids

The new CDC report is at odds with a working paper recently published by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), a non-profit, private think tank. The NBER report largely blames prescription opioids for the U.S. overdose epidemic – not street drugs or so-called “deaths of despair” caused by rising social isolation and economic distress.  

“People have blamed all sorts of things, heroin from Mexico and fentanyl from China and economic decline and so on and so forth,” co-author Janet Currie, PhD, a professor of economics at Princeton University, told Yahoo Finance. “But really the issue is that a whole lot of people got addicted because they were prescribed pain medications which aren’t prescribed in the same way in other countries.”

Currie and co-author Hannes Schwandt, PhD, an economics professor at Northwestern University, say pharmaceutical companies aggressively marketed opioids at a time when doctors were being encouraged to treat pain as “the fifth vital sign.”

“We argue that the development and marketing of a new generation of prescription opioids sparked the epidemic and that provider behavior is still helping to drive it,” the NBER report states. “Prior to the marketing push, most doctors had believed that opioids were too addictive and dangerous for anyone except terminally ill patients. Aggressive marketing by pharmaceutical companies changed those perceptions: Sales of opioid pain killers quadrupled between 1999 and 2013, fueling the rise in overdose deaths.”

What Curry and Schwandt fail to mention is that opioid prescriptions have fallen by nearly 40% since 2013. And their report only briefly mentions the rising toll taken by illicit fentanyl and other street drugs.

Fatal drug overdoses fell in 2018, for the first time in nearly 30 years, but many signs indicate they are rising again and that the COVID-19 pandemic is making the crisis worse in the U.S. and Canada.   

Canada’s Chief Public Health Officer recently warned the pandemic is fueling another surge in drug deaths in Canada.

“Tragically, in many regions of the country, the COVID-19 pandemic is contributing to an increase in drug-related overdoses and deaths,” Dr. Theresa Tam said in a statement. “There are indications that the street drug supply is growing more unpredictable and toxic in some parts of the country, as previous supply chains have been disrupted by travel restrictions and border measures. Public health measures designed to reduce the impact of COVID-19 may increase isolation, stress and anxiety as well as put a strain on the supports for persons who use drugs.”