Medical Cannabis Reduced Opioid Use in High Dose Patients

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

In recent years, there have been several studies and surveys – most of them anecdotal -- suggesting that cannabis reduces the need for opioid pain medication. A large new study takes that research a step further, finding direct evidence that chronic pain patients, including those on high doses, significantly reduced their opioid use once they started using medical cannabis.

Researchers with the New York State Department of Health and University of Albany School of Public Health followed over 8,100 patients on long-term opioid therapy (LOT) after they began using medical cannabis. All of the patients had been on opioids for at least 120 days, including some on relatively high daily doses of 90 or more morphine milligram equivalents (MME).

Researchers found that average daily doses declined significantly over time, especially for patients on high opioid doses. After eight months of using medical cannabis (MC), patients taking over 90 MME saw their daily doses fall by nearly 70 percent, compared to a 29% reduction in those getting 50 to 90 MME and a 15% reduction in those on 50 MME or less.

“This cohort study found that receiving MC for longer was associated with opioid dosage reductions. The reductions were larger among individuals who were prescribed higher dosages of opioids at baseline. These findings contribute robust evidence for clinicians regarding the potential benefits of MC in reducing the opioid burden for patients receiving LOT and possibly reduce their risk for overdose,” researchers reported in JAMA Network Open.

The study has some weaknesses. Researchers did not track the pain levels of patients or the types of pain conditions they suffered from. Also unknown is the dose or types of cannabis products they consumed.   

Although the study was conducted at a time when patients nationwide were losing access to opioids or having their doses reduced, researchers say it is “highly unlikely” that impacted their findings because the dosage decline for their patients didn’t begin until they started consuming cannabis.  

Marijuana advocates cheered the study findings.  

“The relationship between cannabis and opioid use is among of the best-documented aspects of marijuana policy,” Paul Armentano, Deputy Director of NORML, said in a statement. “In short, the science demonstrates that marijuana is a relatively safe and effective pain reliever — and that patients with legal access to it consistently reduce their use of prescription opioid medications.” 

A similar study of over 500 chronic pain patients being treated at medical cannabis clinics found a significant decline in their pain levels. And 85% of patients reported they either reduced or stopped using opioids.

DEA Lifts Limits on Buprenorphine Use

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

After years of strict limits on the number of patients that a provider can treat with buprenorphine, it’s suddenly a lot easier to prescribe the drug for opioid use disorder (OUD). The Drug Enforcement Administration has eliminated the “X-Waiver” program for buprenorphine, a move required by Congress under the 2023 Appropriations Act.  

Elimination of the X-Waiver removes all patient caps and significantly increases the number of providers that can treat OUD with buprenorphine, a long-acting opioid similar to methadone. When combined with naloxone, an overdose prevention drug, buprenorphine reduces opioid cravings and eases withdrawal. Prescriptions for Suboxone and other buprenorphine/naloxone combinations now only require a provider to get a standard DEA registration for controlled substances.

“DEA fully supports this significant policy reform. ln this moment, when the United States is suffering tens of thousands of opioid-related drug poisoning deaths every year, the DEA 's top priority is doing everything in our power to save lives. Medication for opioid use disorder helps those who are fighting to overcome opioid use disorder by sustaining recovery and preventing overdoses,” DEA Administrator Anne Milgram wrote in a January 12 letter to providers.

The DEA is also developing a new mandatory eight-hour training program for providers to help them identify and treat OUD when they apply for or renew their registrations. The new training will be required on June 21.

“I think this is overdue. Buprenorphine can reduce the risks of overdose by 60% and is much safer than methadone,” says Lynn Webster, MD, an expert in pain management who is a Senior Fellow at the Center for U.S. Policy. “It would be controversial, but I believe low-dose buprenorphine should be OTC as a harm reduction measure. At least there should be a discussion about the potential benefit vs risk.”

Pressure to Prescribe

It remains to be seen how the elimination of the X-Waiver will affect pain patients. Over the years, we’ve heard complaints from patients who say they were coerced by their doctors into taking Suboxone, even though it’s not approved as a treatment for pain. With patient caps removed and more doctors able to prescribe buprenorphine, there could be added pressure on pain patients to take Suboxone – whether they show signs of OUD or not.

“I understand the pressure to use buprenorphine for pain rather than traditional opioids. It is a much safer opioid than most, so it should be considered as a first line therapy,” says Webster. “However, that is the rub. It is not effective or tolerated in many patients.  Patients have a legitimate concern that they may be coerced to transition to buprenorphine when their existing medications are working and there are no signs of abuse.     

“I don't think the change in regulations will mean more doctors will push their patients to use buprenorphine, because the mind-set is already there.” 

A little-known aspect of buprenorphine is that it blocks other opioids from working – meaning anyone who is taking it should be aware that if they have acute pain from an accident, trauma or surgery, they’ll have to rely on non-opioid pain relievers.  

While often touted as the most effective medication for OUD, most people who take buprenorphine relapse and starting taking opioids again. About two-thirds of the patients who receive Suboxone stop filling prescriptions for it after just three months. 

Although it’s difficult to get high on buprenorphine, it can still be misused. A 2021 study found the misuse rate for buprenorphine was over two times higher than misuse rates for hydrocodone, oxycodone and other opioid pain medications.

Doctor Convicted of Illegal Opioid Prescribing Imprisoned Before Sentencing

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

A Louisiana doctor who federal prosecutors labeled as a "drug dealer in a white coat" has been taken into custody, weeks before he was scheduled to be sentenced for improperly prescribing opioid pain medication.

A jury found Randy Lamartiniere guilty last month on 20 counts of illegally distributing controlled substances outside the usual course of a medical practice. The 64-year old doctor was out on bail and scheduled for sentencing on March 30, but prosecutors wanted him taken into custody immediately after his conviction. A judge denied their motion, pending another court hearing on Tuesday, January 17.

“Needless to say this hearing is about as scary as it gets as I may or may not be taken into custody then. Kind of impossible to prepare for being incarcerated for 5-10 years in this situation,” Lamartiniere posted on his Facebook account prior to the hearing.

“There is no justification for pre-sentencing incarceration of course. I have an excellent chance of an appeal and a new trial and am hoping to stay out of prison altogether. Could use some support and kind thoughts at this extremely trying time. I’m more anxious about this than prior to my trial.”

Lamartiniere’s fears were justified, as the judge reversed his previous decision and had him taken into custody. According to Lamartiniere’s sister, he is now in a crowded holding cell with 18 other men, awaiting transfer to another facility.

Dr. Randy Lamartiniere

Lamartiniere faces up to 400 years in prison when he’s sentenced in March – 20 years for each count – but is likely to get less under federal sentencing guidelines. It’s also possible he could be freed on bail again, pending his appeal.

Lamartiniere’s legal troubles date back several years. The Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners issued an emergency order in 2015 suspending his license to prescribe opioids and other controlled substances. Despite the suspension, Lamartiniere kept writing “medically unnecessary prescriptions,” according to prosecutors, charging patients $100 to $300 per visit and taking payments only in cash. Baton Rouge police arrested him in 2016, but legal delays prevented his trial until last year.

As he awaited trial, Lamartiniere became active in the pain community, giving advice and encouragement to patients unable to find good pain care. Beau Brindley, Lamartiniere’s defense attorney, told jurors during closing arguments that he prescribed drugs in “good faith” to people he believed were in real pain.

“Taking the patient at face value is not a crime,” Brindley said, according to The Advocate. “He was an old-school doctor trying to manage patients in a new age world. … He was trying, and trying makes him not guilty. There is no way to prove that he was not making an honest effort.”

That “honest effort” will form the basis of Lamartiniere’s appeal, which is based in part on a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in favor of two doctors who were also convicted of overprescribing opioids. Writing for the majority in that case, Justice Stephen Breyer said it was up to prosecutors to prove that doctors “knowingly or intentionally acted in an unauthorized manner" under the Controlled Substance Act.

So far the high court’s decision has had a mixed impact on other doctors in similar situations. Earlier this month, Dr. Lesley Pompy was acquitted by a Michigan jury of charges that he illegally distributed opioids and committed health care fraud. The charges stemmed from an investigation of Pompy that began in 2016.

More recently, the DEA suspended the license of Dr. David Bockoff, a California physician who was treating patients with severe pain conditions who required high-dose opioids. At least three people have died as a result of that suspension. Bockoff is currently appealing the DEA’s suspension.

Emergency Room Visits Soar for Cancer Patients Needing Pain Relief

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

The number of cancer patients seeking treatment for pain in U.S. emergency departments has doubled in recent years, according to a large new study that further documents the harm caused to patients by misguided efforts to reduce opioid prescribing.

The study, conducted by a team of cancer researchers, looked at health data from 2012 to 2019 for millions of patients who had a cancer diagnosis and were not in remission.  Of the 35 million visits made to an emergency department (ED) by those patients, over half were deemed preventable – meaning the visits could have been avoided if the patient has received proper care earlier.

By a wide margin, pain was the most likely reason for a preventable ED visit. The number of cancer patients who went to an ED for poorly controlled pain rose from nearly 1.2 million in 2012 to 2.4 million in 2019. About a quarter of them had pain so severe they were admitted.  

“Consistent with previous studies, we found that pain was the most common presenting symptom (36.9%) in ED visits among patients with cancer and that the number of patients with cancer who visited an ED because of pain more than doubled over the study period,” lead author Amir Alishahi Tabriz, MD, a research scientist at the Moffitt Cancer Center in Florida, reported in JAMA Network Open.

“A possible explanation could be the unintended consequences of the efforts within the past decade to decrease overall opioid administration in response to the opioid epidemic.”

“I am not at all surprised by their result, as they are consistent with what I’m hearing from colleagues across the U.S.,” says Chad Kollas, MD, a palliative care physician and longtime critic of the 2016 CDC opioid guideline, which discouraged the prescribing of opioids for pain.

The CDC guideline was only intended for primary care physicians treating non-cancer pain, but it was quickly adopted throughout the U.S. healthcare system, including the field of oncology. Previous studies have documented how opioid prescriptions and doses declined for cancer patients, with the Cancer Action Network warning in 2019 that there has been “a significant increase in cancer patients and survivors being unable to access their opioid prescriptions.”

One of the most egregious cases involved April Doyle, a California woman with Stage 4 terminal breast cancer.  In 2019, Doyle posted a tearful video online after a pharmacist refused to fill her opioid prescription. She died about a year later, after the cancer metastasized into her lungs, spine and hip. 

“Unfortunately, the systematic misapplication of the 2016 Guideline created harms for patients due to reduced access to pain care and increased risk of suicide after nonconsensual or excessively rapid opioid tapers. These harms are predictable features of policy changes based on misguided calls for unfocused reductions in opioid prescribing,” Kollas told PNN.

Even if a cancer patient goes to an emergency room for pain relief, the odds of them — or any other patient — getting an opioid is dwindling. A new study by the National Center for Health Statistics found that the percentage of ED visits that ended with an opioid prescribed at discharge fell from 21.5% in 2010 to just 8.1% in 2020.

‘I Blame the CDC’

After years of complaints and bureaucratic delays, the CDC finally revised its opioid guideline in 2022 to more explicitly exclude patients undergoing cancer treatment, palliative care and end-of-life care. But many cancer patients felt it was too little, too late.

“My Mother had stage 4 terminal lung cancer. She was in horrible bone pain and her cancer doctor told her to take Tylenol for pain. We made several trips to the ER in the middle of the night just to manage her pain,” one woman told us. “She could not even enjoy her last moments on this earth with her family because of horrible cancer pain. As it spread all over, I could not help her. I am a nurse who watched her die miserably and I blame the CDC.”

“I live with stage 4 cancer and can't get any pain medication. I can't get any doctors to help me treat my pain,” another nurse told PNN. “My experience helps me understand why people become suicidal because they can't live with the pain anymore.”

“Stop making doctors afraid to treat pain adequately! I need a higher strength opioid for my chronic pain and my doctor will not up my strength because of that fear,” said another patient. “My husband has Stage 4 cancer and they refuse to up his strength as well. This is a crime against humanity!”

“Over the past decade, there has been a seismic shift in prescribing practices and sharp declines in access to these medications for patients with cancer.”

— Dr. Andrea Enzinger, Harvard Medical School

In another large study that looked at racial and ethnic disparities in the treatment of Medicare patients with advanced cancer, researchers saw a steady decline in opioid prescriptions and a rapid expansion in urine drug testing from 2007 to 2019. Their findings, published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, show that less than a third of late-stage cancer patients received an opioid for pain control in 2019 and only 9.4% received a long-acting opioid near the end of life.

Black and Hispanic cancer patients were less likely to receive opioids than their White counterparts. They were also more likely to get smaller doses than White patients.

"Over the past decade, there has been a seismic shift in prescribing practices and sharp declines in access to these medications for patients with cancer,” said lead author Andrea Enzinger, MD, a gastrointestinal oncologist and assistant professor at Harvard Medical School. “Our findings are startling because everyone should agree that cancer patients should have equal access to pain relief at the end of life."

The Real Hoax About Prescription Opioids

By Barby Ingle, PNN Columnist

How many have to die? How many have to be denied? How many have to suffer unnecessarily?

Those are some of the questions I’m asking after reading a recent article in The Guardian about the CDC’s revised opioid guideline. The article has a few misstatements about prescription opioids that I have issues with. 

Before I share my take, I want readers to know that I do not take opioid medications myself. I have taken them in the past, but found other treatments that were more effective, so I stopped taking opioids in 2009. I also have an allergy to OxyContin, which I discovered after a knee surgery.

In 2018, I underwent pharmacogenomic testing, which I highly recommend for anyone who has chronic physical conditions. It has given me the best precision care available. I still live with multiple chronic pain and rare diseases, and will need treatment for the rest of my life.

You may be aware that I recently stepped down as president and a board member of the International Pain Foundation (iPain). It was a completely volunteer position. I have been advocating through many nonprofits since 2006 and have always been transparent about any funding that the charity or I received. I also have a degree from George Mason University in Psychology.

Which brings me back to the claims about addiction, opioids and patient advocacy that Dr. Andrew Kolodny, president of Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing (PROP), made in The Guardian article. This quote is from Kolodny about patient suicides:

“This is a really serious issue. But what the opioid advocates, many with industry ties, disclosed or undisclosed, pushed was this false narrative about an epidemic of suicide and so there was a manufactured backlash against the CDC guidelines.

“The notion that there are patients losing access to an effective treatment, and therefore they have no choice but to kill themselves because they’re in so much pain now, that’s a hoax. But the idea that someone in the context of acute withdrawal would kill themselves, that certainly could be real because it’s so excruciating.”

From the perspective of a pain patient and a former nonprofit board member, I want to set the record straight about Kolodny’s alleged “hoax.” Yes, addiction is a serious issue. Under-treatment of chronic pain is also a serious issue. Any mistreatment of people with chronic care challenges is an issue.

The healthcare system in the U.S. is working as it was designed and needs to be thrown out. We are all individuals and should be treated by the providers of our choosing to get the care that we need — not as the healthcare system dictates. Not every provider is great, not every patient is great, and no treatment works for everyone. 

In America, we live in a “free” society. I believe we should be able to choose our own care and moral stance. But I wonder why Kolodny believes his moral stance should supersede what a provider and patient feel is best, whether it’s addiction treatment, pain management or any particular choice of care.

We should have full access to whatever we are willing to do to our own bodies. I have said many times over the years that I do not want to be a guinea pig anymore. I work hard to manage my pain levels, my surroundings, my energy pennies, and the people around me.

‘Advocates With Industry Ties’

Kolodny claims that many “opioid advocates” have industry ties and manufactured a false narrative about patient suicides in a backlash against the CDC guideline.

As a patient advocate who has been working with nonprofits for almost 20 years, I believe that the pharmaceutical industry should be giving money to the pain community to help us with tools and resources that make our lives better.

People think it’s easy for advocacy groups to get funding from Pharma, but that is not true, at least for the small funding that I was involved with. I know firsthand the many checks and balances that are needed before any grant money is provided. It did not matter if it was $100 or $10,000. Nonprofits have to account for it on their tax returns and through audits.

Since 2015, grant money from Pharma for iPain completely stopped, even the small amounts that we were getting. We went from completing over 200 grant applications a year, and getting less than 5 percent of them approved, down to a 0% success rate. There is nothing to report when you receive nothing, which is how it is going now for most patient advocacy organizations and support groups.

Receiving nothing from Pharma did not change our opinions or goals. We found other ways to accomplish them on a shoestring budget. I wish it was easier, but being hard does not stop the movement, because it is a matter of life or death in too many cases. Our work at iPain continued, because it was never about spreading whatever Pharma wanted. It was always about helping patients get individualized care. And all options, including opioids, should be on the table.  

Our work continued on a smaller scale and more creatively than if we had a large budget to get things done. At about the same time that our funding dried up, social media took off and it became easier to reach more people and actually be heard. We were still able to accomplish our goals, at less cost and with less funding.

I do not have the time, energy or space in this column to go into the many financial ties — disclosed and undisclosed — that Kolodny and PROP have with law firms involved in opioid litigation, which funded their efforts to take opioids away from patients. Good God, what is the point of him being so moral in his own eyes, that he does not let other people choose what is best for them?  

Patients losing access to treatment is real. So are patients dying or contemplating suicide. I receive emails and calls from them regularly, even since stepping down from iPain.

The first patient I lost due to being cut off from medication was in 2012. She was one of my best friends at the time. I talked to her often. She was on a medication that was helping. The provider cut her off and put her on a different drug. Neither were opioids. She was stable and doing well with the first medication, but not on the second one. My friend decided that jumping out of a 10-story window to her death would be better than not having the medication that was giving her more quality of life.

Kolodny says someone in acute withdrawal might kill themselves because it is so excruciating. Yes, Dr. Kolodny, withdrawal is hard and you are forcing it on people who are already in pain, who did not need or ask for your opinion. That is the real hoax.

Barby Ingle is a reality TV personality living with multiple rare and chronic diseases. She is a chronic pain educator, patient advocate, motivational speaker, and best-selling author on pain topics. Barby has received over 25 awards for her advocacy efforts over the years. You can follow her at www.barbyingle.com 

DEA Warns About Fentanyl As It Draws Criticism for Crackdown on Doctors

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

The Drug Enforcement Administration has issued another public warning about the growing risk of counterfeit opioids and other medications made with illicit fentanyl. Over two-thirds of the drug deaths in the U.S. involve synthetic opioids like fentanyl, which is 50 to 100 times more potent that morphine.

Last year the DEA seized over 50 million counterfeit pills laced with fentanyl and more than 10,000 pounds of fentanyl powder. The seizures represent more than 379 million potentially deadly doses of fentanyl, according to the DEA, enough to kill every man, woman and child in the United States.

Over 56,000 American deaths last year involved fentanyl, nearly the number that died in the Vietnam War, and the crisis appears to be escalating. In 2021, a DEA laboratory analysis estimated that 4 out of 10 counterfeit pills laced with fentanyl contained a potentially lethal dose. The DEA now estimates that six out of ten fake pills contain a deadly dose of fentanyl. Just two milligrams of fentanyl, enough to fit on the tip of a pencil, is considered a potentially lethal dose.

“More than half of the fentanyl-laced fake prescription pills being trafficked in communities across the country now contain a potentially deadly dose of fentanyl. This marks a dramatic increase – from four out of ten to six out of ten – in the number of pills that can kill,” DEA Administrator Anne Milgram said in a public safety alert. “Never take a pill that wasn’t prescribed directly to you. Never take a pill from a friend. Never take a pill bought on social media. Just one pill is dangerous and one pill can kill.”

In an effort to bring more public attention to the fentanyl crisis, the DEA launched its One Pill Can Kill campaign, which highlights the similarities between real medications like oxycodone and alprazolam and their fake counterparts. The counterfeit pills are mass produced by drug traffickers in the U.S. and Mexico, using chemicals largely sourced from China.

Backlash Against DEA

As the DEA grapples with the fentanyl crisis, it’s coming under growing criticism about its efforts to reduce the supply of legal prescription opioids. Recent articles in USA Today, The New York Times, Los Angeles Times and VICE News – many based on stories that first appeared on PNN – suggest that the mainstream media is slowly coming to recognize the harm caused to pain patients by the DEA’s enforcement actions against doctors who prescribe opioids.

“Law enforcement agencies, especially the Drug Enforcement Administration, are out of control, with the DEA routinely caught releasing ‘safety plans’ for the patients of arrested physicians that simply direct pain patients to the nearest emergency room,” wrote Peter Pischke, a disabled freelance journalist, in a USA Today op/ed.

“American medicine and law enforcement continue to fight the last war. Policymakers still operate under the assumption that too many opioids are being prescribed. Overdose deaths — including those among adolescents — are now overwhelmingly caused by street fentanyl, not prescription medications,” Maia Szalavitz wrote in The New York Times.

The backlash against the DEA produced a backlash of its own in Newsweek, in an op/ed by a former deputy chief of staff at the DEA. Rather than doing fewer enforcement actions against doctors, Jim Crotty believes there should be more.

“With the U.S. drug crisis reaching unprecedented levels, and many opioid use disorders starting with prescription drugs, now is not the time to increase their availability,” wrote Crotty, who said the recent deaths of patients who lost access to opioids when their doctor’s license was suspended do not justify a change in DEA policy.

“These isolated incidents, however tragic, should not be used to upend otherwise sound drug policies designed to protect the American public from drug addiction and abuse,” said Crotty. “The U.S. is making slow but steady progress in rolling back the opioid crisis, but there is much work to be done. The threat of prescription opioids still looms large and requires continued vigilance from DEA and its partners to protect Americans' health and safety. We should be asking them to do more, not less.”

Crotty said over 13,000 Americans have died from overdoses involving prescription opioids in the last 12 months – a fraction of the number dying from fentanyl -- and repeated the old saw about the U.S. being “the world's largest consumer of prescription opioids.” That may have been true a decade ago, but no longer is. The U.S. now ranks 8th in per capita opioid consumption, behind Canada, Australia and several European countries

Letters to Doctors Reduced Their Opioid Prescribing for a Year

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Many doctors in the U.S. have scaled back or stopped prescribing opioid pain medication because they fear scrutiny or even imprisonment by the DEA and other law enforcement agencies.

A team of USC researchers believes there’s a better way to address risky opioid prescribing: have coroners and medical examiners notify all doctors by letter when a patient dies from an overdose.  

“This is not meant to be a law enforcement exercise but a simple nudge. The point is not to scare, blame or shame doctors, but to make them aware of real risks in their patient cohorts, risks they may not be aware of otherwise,” says Jason Doctor, PhD, Professor and Chair of Health Policy and Management at USC’s Sol Price School of Public Policy.

Doctor and his colleagues found that when 809 prescribers received a letter from San Diego county’s medical examiner notifying them about the overdose death of a patient, they reduced the doses of opioid prescriptions they wrote for up to a year afterward. Their findings, published in JAMA Network Open, builds upon a previous study that found the same clinicians reduced their prescribing for three months after receiving such a letter.

"Clinicians don't necessarily know a patient they prescribed opioids to has suffered a fatal overdose," said Doctor. “We knew closing this information loop immediately reduced opioid prescriptions. Our latest study shows that change in prescribing behavior seems to stick."

Nationwide, opioid prescribing has fallen dramatically over the past decade. But USC researchers found the reduction was faster and more extensive among clinicians who received the letter. After one year, their prescriptions were 7.1% lower in morphine milligram equivalent units (MME) than clinicians who hadn't received the letter. The number of new patients they prescribed opioids to also fell by two percent.

"The new study shows this change is not just a temporary blip and then clinicians went back to their previous prescribing," said Doctor. "This low-cost intervention has a long-lasting impact."

Other Drugs Often Involved

There are three major caveats to the USC study. The first is that other substances besides prescription opioids – such as illicit drugs -- were involved in many of the overdose deaths. That’s because the criteria for the study were broad and subjective, including any patient who died when "prescription drug overdose was the primary cause or contributed to the cause of death."

Second, clinicians were included in the study if they had written any opioid prescription within 12 months of the patient’s death. That would explain why 809 prescribers received letters about the overdoses of 166 patients. Doctors received a letter even if a patient was no longer under their care and without conclusive evidence that the prescription they wrote was involved in the death.

Third, the study does not address the growing number of deaths caused by illicit fentanyl, which is now responsible for the vast majority of U.S. overdoses. Letters to doctors are unlikely to have any major effect on overdoses involving street drugs. A 2022 study confirmed there is very little correlation between overdoses, prescription opioids and MME dosage levels.

There have been several previous efforts to rein in opioid prescribing by sending warning letters to doctors. Federal prosecutors in Wisconsin and other states have done it, telling high-dose prescribers they could face prosecution, even when they have not been charged with a crime or linked to an overdose.

The Medical Board of California’s “Death Certificate Project” sent threatening letters to doctors about overdoses that occurred months or years after an opioid prescription was written -- an effort that some likened to a “witch hunt.” Some doctors were targeted even when multiple drugs were involved or the cause of death was suicide.

USC’s Doctor says a gentler “nudge” is needed, not threats. And he wishes the letters sent to San Diego doctors were mandatory statewide.

“That was a terrible approach to delivering letters that the medical board carried out,” Doctor wrote in an email. “We had none of the outcry or problems the (board) did because we were supportive and met clinicians on a professional level.”

A Third of Chronic Pain Sufferers Used Cannabis for Pain Relief

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Nearly a third of U.S. adults (31%) with chronic pain have used cannabis as an analgesic, according to a new survey that found over half of those who used cannabis said it enabled them to decrease their use of opioid medication and other pain therapies.

The survey findings, published JAMA Network Open, involved 1,724 people with chronic non-cancer pain who live in the 36 states (and Washington DC) that have legalized medical marijuana.

Unlike other studies that only focused on cannabis reducing opioid use, this survey found that over half of pain sufferers using cannabis also reduced or stop using non-opioid prescription pain relievers and over-the-counter analgesics. Many respondents also reported decreasing their use of physical therapy (39%), cognitive behavioral therapy (26%) and meditation (19%).  

“Most persons who used cannabis as a treatment for chronic pain reported substituting cannabis in place of other pain medications including prescription opioids,” wrote lead author Mark Bicket, MD, an Assistant Professor in the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan School of Medicine.

“The high degree of substitution of cannabis with both opioid and nonopioid treatment emphasizes the importance of research to clarify the effectiveness and potential adverse consequences of cannabis for chronic pain. Our results suggest that state cannabis laws have enabled access to cannabis as an analgesic treatment despite knowledge gaps in use as a medical treatment for pain.”

The survey did not ask whether respondents smoked, vaped or ingested cannabis products, so there’s no way to tell which method was more effective at reducing pain. Nevertheless, it adds to a growing body of evidence that cannabis reduces pain and helps pain sufferers decrease their use of medications and other therapies.  

“Cannabis has established efficacy in the treatment of multiple conditions, including chronic pain, and it possesses a safety profile that is either comparable or superior to other controlled substances,” said Paul Armentano, Deputy Director of NORML, a marijuana advocacy group.

“So it is no wonder that those with legal access to it are substituting cannabis in lieu of other, potentially less effective and more harmful substances. As legal access continues to expand, one would expect the cannabis substitution effect to grow even more pronounced in the future.”

Several previous studies have also found that cannabis users often reduce their use of prescription opioids. A large survey conducted last year found that most medical marijuana users either stopped (42%) or reduced (37%) their use of opioids. A small number were also able to stop using psychiatric medications for anxiety, depression and PTSD.  

Another recent study at Cornell University found that legalization of recreational marijuana in 11 states led to significantly reduced prescribing for Medicaid patients for a broad range of medications used to treat pain, depression, anxiety, seizures and other health conditions.

A 2021 Harris Poll found that twice as many Americans are using cannabis or CBD to manage their pain than opioids.

Judge Won’t Stop DEA Despite Patient Deaths

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

A federal judge in California has refused to grant a temporary restraining order that would have allowed Dr. David Bockoff to resume prescribing opioid medication to hundreds of pain patients at his practice in Beverly Hills. 

The Drug Enforcement Administration suspended Bockoff’s license to prescribe controlled substances on November 1, claiming five of his patients were in “imminent danger” because he prescribed high doses of opioids and kept inadequate medical records. Since the DEA’s suspension, however, at least two of Bockoff’s patients have died -- not because of his medical care, but from the lack of it.

Danny Elliott and his wife were so distraught over his inability to find another doctor and get opioid treatment that they both committed suicide on November 7.  Four weeks later, Jessica Fujimaki died at her home, apparently from complications caused by pain and opioid withdrawal. Both Elliott and Fujimaki had incurable conditions that cause severe pain and needed high dose opioids to have any quality of life.

Despite those deaths and the threat posed to other sick patients who can’t find new providers, Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. sided with the DEA, saying the “potential impact” on Bockoff’s patients was outweighed by the DEA’s concerns about his record keeping.

“The need for careful evaluation, monitoring, and control in these circumstances is obvious; and the combination of high dosages and the lack of documentation justifying those dosages and demonstrating proper evaluation and oversight is troubling,” Blumenfeld wrote in his 7-page ruling.

“As for the public interest, the Court is certainly concerned about the potential impact on vulnerable patients who need treatment to manage their pain. This concern, however, must be evaluated in the context of a case in which the DEA is asserting abusive prescription practices and its decision is entitled to deferential review.”

Bockoff has practiced medicine for over 50 years in California without any prior record of disciplinary action or complaints. The DEA provided no evidence that any of Bockoff’s patients – including the five said to be in “imminent danger” – were harmed while under his care.

One of the five – who is only identified in court records as “EC” – has lived with severe pancreatic pain for over 15 years. Bockoff gave her prescriptions for methadone and fentanyl, a potent synthetic opioid. In its emergency suspension order, the DEA said that use of fentanyl was “not consistent with FDA approved use,” and put EC at higher risk for addiction, overdose and death.

However, in an email provided to the judge, EC said she needed high doses of fentanyl to be able to work and eat food.

“I have exacerbated pain anytime I smell food, eat food, digest food, or sometimes just randomly,” EC wrote. “This pain medication allows me to practice law and serve as a prominent traumatic brain injury litigator and managing attorney for the largest personal injury law firm in California.

“I am able to rise to this level of practice because Dr. Bockoff counsels me on how to manage my pain and prescribes medication for me that allows me to manage my pain so I can be a contributing member of society.”

Judge Blumenfeld dismissed the email, essentially saying that EC’s medical records were more important than her ability to eat and work.

“While proper pain management can have significant benefits, E.C’s email does not fully address the allegations that she was prescribed controlled substances without proper medical evaluation, monitoring, and documentation,” the judge wrote.

‘More Deaths Could Be Imminent’

Several other patients – whose full names were redacted -- also provided testimonials about their care under Bockoff.

“I want to say I appreciate Dr. David Bockoff as the rarest of physicians that actually cares about my health and well-being,” MC wrote in a letter. “If I no longer could receive my pain medication from Dr. Bockoff I would not be able to walk, do house chores, continue part time consulting work, go to school, drive, not be able to get out of bed or walk even in the house.”

“I suffer from a great deal of pain and without medication my life would be awful. I would not be able to move, stand or do any of the activities that I do perform,” said SH. “Dr. Bockoff has helped me tremendously and I need his service in order to have some quality of life.”

“Dr. Bockoff’s practice is already filled with patients who are in a dangerous medical predicament, with no medicine. As more patients run out of their last month’s medication, more deaths could be imminent,” warned DL.

Judge Blumenfeld rejected those claims as well, saying Bockoff’s attorney, Ashli Summer McKeivier, provided no evidence that Bockoff’s medical practice faced “irreparable harm” from to his suspension or that the DEA erred in suspending his license.  

“Plaintiff has not responded by producing substantial evidence to refute claims that he has been improperly dispensing high dosages of the controlled substances at issue,” Blumenfeld wrote. “Nor has Plaintiff shown that there are no other available providers able to properly treat patients who can no longer receive a prescription from him.”

“I’m very disappointed in the judge’s ruling,” McKeivier told PNN.

Munzing Testimony

Much of the government’s case against Bockoff is dependent on the opinions of Dr. Timothy Munzing, a family practice physician who has created a lucrative second career for himself by working as a consultant for the DEA and DOJ. According to GovTribe, a website that tracks federal contracts, Munzing has made over $3.4 million in the last 8 years working for the government and testifying in dozens of cases against doctors.

“Dr. Munzing will testify that Dr. Bockoff’s patient care fell below the standard of care in California and the prescriptions resulting from several examinations were not for a legitimate medical purpose,” the DEA said in court documents. Munzing was not called to testify before Judge Blumenfeld.

McKeivier says the DEA failed to prove there was any “imminent danger” or harm done to Bockoff’s patients, even though Munzing reviewed three years of his medical records.

“The government made an argument that basically disproved itself,” she said. “If you’ve got 3 years of records and in those 3 years of records you cannot point to one example of death, overdose, bodily injury or diversion, then that disproves the fact that any of the danger based on those things is imminent. If for three years you have a track record of it never happening, then how can it be imminent to happen now?”  

Bockoff is pursuing another legal avenue by appealing his suspension to a DEA Administrative Law Judge, who will begin hearings in Washington DC on January 19. That hearing process is expected to take nine days. A final decision on the suspension could be weeks or months after that.

Guideline Recommends Surgery Patients Be Screened for Cannabis Use

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

New medical guidelines recommend that all patients undergoing anesthesia should be screened for cannabis use before surgery, and that procedures should be delayed if patients are thought to be under the influence or impaired.

The guideline by the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA Pain Medicine) is intended for anesthesiologists. It was developed by a panel of experts that included anesthesiologists, pain specialists and a patient advocate to deal with the growing number of people using either recreational or medical marijuana. An estimated 10% of Americans use cannabis monthly.

“Before surgery, anesthesiologists should ask patients if they use cannabis – whether medicinally or recreationally – and be prepared to possibly change the anesthesia plan or delay the procedure in certain situations,” Samer Narouze, MD, ASRA Pain Medicine president, said in a statement.

“They also need to counsel patients about the possible risks and effects of cannabis. For example, even though some people use cannabis therapeutically to help relieve pain, studies have shown regular users may have more pain and nausea after surgery, not less, and may need more medications, including opioids, to manage the discomfort. We hope the guidelines will serve as roadmap to help better care for patients who use cannabis and need surgery.”

The guideline recommends that patients be asked about their cannabis use before surgery, including whether it was smoked or ingested, the amount used, how recently it was used, and the frequency of use. It does not endorse drug testing of patients, meaning patients would have to be taken at their word.

If a patient admits recently smoking cannabis, the guideline recommends that non-emergency, elective procedures be postponed for a minimum of two hours because of the increased risk of a heart attack before, during and after surgery.

“In my opinion, these guidelines appear to be overly cautious at best and discriminatory at worst,” said Paul Armentano, Deputy Director of NORML, a marijuana advocacy group. “The relationship between cannabis and opioids is well-established, with nearly 100 papers in the literature showing that pain patients typically reduce or eliminate their intake of opioids over time following cannabis use.” 

Armentano cited a recent pilot study that found people who use cannabis respond no differently to local anesthesia than those who do not. Local anesthesia is different from general anesthesia because patients remain conscious during a procedure such as dental work. 

The evidence on cannabis and general anesthesia is rather thin, and because of that the ASRA guideline gives low grades to several of its recommendations, including the one about delaying surgery.  No recommendations are made about tapering cannabis use before or after surgery, or whether to prescribe opioids to patients who use cannabinoids due to “current lack of evidence.” Anesthesiologists are instead urged to use their own clinical judgement.   

In 2020, the Perioperative Pain and Addiction Interdisciplinary Network (PAIN) released more restrictive guidelines about cannabis use, recommending that heavy cannabis use be tapered or stopped before surgery.

Charges Against Founder of Genetic Testing Company Dropped

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

The U.S. Department of Justice has quietly dropped criminal charges against the founder and CEO of Proove Biosciences, a genetic testing company based in California that was accused of paying physicians over $3.5 million in illegal kickbacks. A judge dismissed the case against Brian Meshkin and five other defendants last month “in the interests of justice” after federal prosecutors declined to move forward with the case.

“There has been so much injustice over the past 6 years that it is wonderful to see truth prevail.  I am excited to have the opportunity to set the record straight and to move forward from here with my head held high,” Meshkin said in a statement.

A spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney’s Office in San Diego declined to comment on the case being dismissed, according to The Orange County Register.

Proove specialized in genetic testing of pain patients and claimed its DNA tests could determine how well they metabolized opioid medication and if they were at risk of abuse. The company claimed that 94% of patients experienced significant pain relief within 60 days of treatment changes based on their test results.

Proove’s aggressive marketing included millions of dollars in “research fees” paid to physicians who ordered its tests, a practice that ran afoul of federal kickback laws. In 2017, the company’s headquarters in Irvine, CA was raided by FBI agents and Proove was placed into a court-ordered receivership – a form of bankruptcy – when its business collapsed.

The former vice-president of marketing for Proove plead guilty in 2020 to paying illegal kickbacks. The following year, the National Spine & Pain Center in Maryland agreed to pay $5.1 million in restitution to Medicare as part of a criminal settlement for taking kickbacks from Proove.

Meshkin blamed the company's legal and financial problems on “erroneous and damaging” reports by STAT News, which detailed how physicians could make up to $144,000 a year if they funneled their patients’ genetic tests to Proove.

“This work was destroyed by misinformation spread by a handful of disgruntled ex-employees and contractors, spread by the media, and blindly adopted by some in the Southern District of California office of the U.S. Attorney and the FBI,” Meshkin said. 

“That misinformation and false and defamatory allegations directed at Proove hurt thousands of people beyond the company itself, including the many patients and their families who have died from or whose lives were impacted by opioid overdoses and suicide that could have been prevented with access to Proove’s life-saving technology.”

Many questions remain about the effectiveness of the tests. A genetic expert told STAT News the company’s testing claims were “hogwash” and said they exploited fears about opioid addiction.  A Montana pain patient who took the test and followed Proove’s treatment advice said they didn’t work for her.

“To me it was a waste of time and money. The meds it said I should be taking either didn’t work, stopped working, or made me sick. And the meds I should not be taking, I do just fine on,” she told PNN in 2017.

Gabapentin Won’t Cure the Opioid Crisis

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

The risk of prescribing gabapentin (Neurontin) off-label for pain management may finally be sinking into the medical community. The latest sign is an op/ed published in JAMA Internal Medicine, which warns that gabapentin is often ineffective for pain, may raise the risk of overdose, and “will not cure the opioid crisis”    

Gabapentin is a non-opioid medication that was originally developed as an anticonvulsant to treat epileptic seizures. In recent years, gabapentin prescribing has grown 5-fold, with a growing number of physicians prescribing it “off-label” for both acute and chronic pain. Some do it as an alternative to opioids, while others prescribe it in conjunction with opioids.

“Gabapentin is often thought of as a safe alternative for pain management and may be initially enticing as a nonopioid medication, though the evidence for its efficacy in pain control is limited,” wrote lead author Raegan Durant, MD, a Professor at University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine and Associate Editor at JAMA.

“With more restrictive opioid prescribing guidelines, physicians may be struggling to treat pain effectively and more frequently turning to gabapentin as a nonopioid option. However, avoidance of opioids at the expense of either more frequent use of gabapentin or concurrent gabapentin and opioids simply exposes patients to similar risks for harm often without improving the likelihood of actual pain relief.”

The warning from Durant and JAMA Associate Editor Audrey Han, MD, stems from a recent study about the “alarming upward trajectory” of gabapentin being co-prescribed with opioids.  From 2006 to 2018, overlapping prescriptions for the two medications rose by 344 percent, with many of the prescriptions being written by pain specialists.

Gabapentin is only approved by the Food and Drug Administration to treat partial seizures, nerve pain from shingles and restless leg syndrome, but is also widely prescribed off-label for fibromyalgia, neuropathy, migraine and other pain conditions – despite little evidence supporting its use.  

In addition to poor pain relief, many patients who take gabapentin report side effects such as dizziness, confusion, drowsiness, mood swings and weight gain. A 2019 study linked gabapentin to a growing number of attempted suicides.

Gabapentin may cause euphoria, feelings of intoxication, and enhance the effects of opioids and other drugs. The FDA has warned that gabapentin may cause serious breathing problems and respiratory depression, especially in older adults. A recent study found gabapentin raises the risk of delirium in seniors recovering from surgery.

My Story: How Opioid Therapy Saved Me and My Family

By Kim Halvorson, Guest Columnist 

I have had reoccurring pain episodes since I was 16 years old.  The one and only doctor we had on the Flathead reservation in Montana created even more problems for me than he solved. First, he offered me opioids (it was the 70’s) and wanted to inject the knots in my body with cortisone, without any diagnoses. My mother and I decided against his advice and began nutrition, exercise and therapy -- both mental and physical.  

When I was almost 30, the same doctor offered me a "new miracle med" that would block the pain signals in my brain. He prescribed the antidepressant amitriptyline, and I had my one and only manic episode. If he had taken any time to recognize my hyper self, maybe he would not have given me an antidepressant without any warnings about its side effects.  The strongest medicine I had ever taken, at that point in my life, was Tylenol.    

It took me a few years to recover from that total breakdown. Waking up in a psych ward is more than a little scary.  But the psychiatrist there listened to me and tried many different medications, until we landed on Klonipin and Trazodone to help me sleep. That was my answer for almost 30 years.

When my two sons were active toddlers, the pain bouts became too much.  My first opioid, at age 40, came with common sense and compassion from a wise and caring doctor. She could not find the underlying cause of my pain, but knew I was telling the truth. After all, I had said no to opioids for 25 years.   

She would write only 3 opioid scripts a year. If I needed more, then we’d have to find out what was going on inside my body. That worked for 10 years. And it taught me discipline.     

KIM HALVERSON

At age 50, I broke my back in 3 places and required daily opioids to move at all.  The doctor linked my meds to better physical function, and I was on that dose for 5 years without an increase. Opioids helped me to hold onto our house and attend my sons' games --- both of them are athletes.    

Then came the "big scare" as I call it.  When Florida lost its mind and went after the pill mills. The country over-reacted to the opioid crisis and in many places still is. The truth about Florida became a fiction about Montana and everywhere else, it seems. The pain clinic that had saved my little family for 5 years got rid of me and many other patients to protect their practice.        

For the next 4 years, a local clinic and a brave nurse practitioner bucked the system and got me half of what I needed.  It was better than nothing and I “saved up” pills by staying in bed until a game was on or some work had to be done.  Those 4 years were hard on me, and I ended up in a wheelchair and incontinent. 

I kept looking for a reasonable doctor and eventually found one. Once I was put back on the dose that worked for those 5 years, it only took a few months to regain my strength enough to face surgery and get a new artificial hip.      

The new hip was supposed to reduce my pain, but my pain level doubled. A new doctor found out why. I had scoliosis, and the surgery that was supposed to help me had locked me into pain 24/7. The first year after the new hip, a lump formed in my back and my body felt the pain I had been trying to avoid all my life.      

I know what is causing my pain now and why certain injuries were far worse than I thought they would be. That hip that looked “blown up” on an x-ray was the fulcrum of my frame, a curve in my spine and I have been wrestling with since I was 16.      

Even knowing all of this, my pain doctor felt pressured to stop helping people like me or anyone with opioids. I was abandoned, but found another doctor who just recently stopped calling himself a “pain management specialist” because of what is still happening to other doctors.    

I am already looking for the next reasonable doctor, just in case, but it is not supposed to be this way.  We shouldn’t have to fight this hard to live any kind of life.    

All of us need to join the fight. We need to start with ourselves and our support team, and then we must find allies within the medical profession and help them help us.  I will protect my three doctors completely.  I never do anything that could be misconstrued by anyone and often supply them with information to protect themselves, just in case.    

And then we all need to share our story.  Help each other with those stories.  Become our own best experts and advocates.   

Kim Halvorson lives outside Missoula, Montana.  

Do you have a “My Story” to share? Pain News Network invites other readers to share their experiences about living with pain and treating it. Send your stories to editor@painnewsnetwork.org.

Gabapentin and Pregabalin Only ‘Modestly Effective’ for Pain

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

A new review of clinical studies on the use of gabapentin (Neurontin) and pregabalin (Lyrica) in pain management found the drugs are only “modestly effective” and could be risky for some pain patients.

Gabapentin and pregabalin belong to a class of nerve medication called gabapentinoids, which were originally developed as anticonvulsants to treat epileptic seizures. In recent years, however, they have been increasingly prescribed off-label as an alternative to opioids in managing pain. About one in five U.S. adults with chronic pain are prescribed a gabapentinoid.  

"Treating pain has been problematic for a long time, and we're still dealing with the fallout from opioid overuse," says lead author Craig Williams, PharmD, a clinical professor at Oregon State University College of Pharmacy. "Gabapentinoids are modestly effective for certain patients; they are rarely extremely effective, and they are not effective at all for some patients because the mechanisms of the pain don't match up with the mechanisms of the drug.

"Doctors who prescribe gabapentinoids for pain should do so with their eyes wide open and be prepared to stop them if they are ineffective or cause too many side effects."

The study findings, published in the journal Drugs, found that many of the clinical trials for gabapentin and pregabalin were of short duration, had a small number of participants, and performed only slightly better than placebos in reducing pain. Many patients who take the medications also report side effects such as dizziness, confusion, drowsiness, mood swings and weight gain.

"Treating pain is about making patients more functional so they can live their lives better, and if they have to deal with adverse effects for a little pain relief, their lives may not be improving," said Williams.

Pregabalin has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for four pain conditions: post-herpetic neuralgia (shingles), diabetic peripheral neuropathy, spinal cord injury, and fibromyalgia. Gabapentin has only been approved by the FDA for post-herpetic neuralgia.

Despite the limits on their uses, many doctors legally prescribe the drugs “off-label” for pain conditions such as migraines, back pain, post-operative pain and even dental pain. Gabapentin was once derisively referred to as “snake oil” by a pharmaceutical executive because it is so widely prescribed for so many different pain conditions, despite weak evidence.

"In addition, we found that the trials used by the FDA to approve gabepentinoids for pain indications had a couple of key structural weaknesses," Williams said. "The trials tended to be short, typically lasting one to three months, and the trials typically excluded the simultaneous use of other medications that affect the central nervous system. That's important because patients taking gabepentinoids are rarely taking them exclusively; they're often prescribed in conjunction with opioids, muscle relaxants or other epilepsy drugs."

Gabapentin can cause euphoria and feelings of intoxication, and make the effect of opioids and other drugs seem stronger. A 2019 study linked gabapentin to a growing number of attempted suicides.

That same year, the FDA warned that gabapentin and pregabalin may cause serious breathing problems and respiratory depression, especially in older adults. A recent study found that gabapentin raises the risk of delirium in older adults recovering from surgery.

Fentanyl Linked to 94% of Overdose Deaths in Massachusetts

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

There’s good and bad news in the latest report on overdose deaths in Massachusetts. State health officials say drug deaths were down slightly in the first nine months of 2022, compared to the same period last year. But deaths involving fentanyl – most likely illicit fentanyl -- rose to 94% of opioid-related overdoses, a record high.

Massachusetts was one of the first states in the U.S. to expand the use of toxicology tests to look for the presence of certain drugs involved in opioid overdoses, instead of just relying on death certificates and coroner reports. That makes its overdose data more accurate.

In the first nine months of 2022, there were 1,340 confirmed opioid-related overdose deaths in Massachusetts, and officials expect that to reach about 1,696 deaths by the end of the year. That’s 25 fewer deaths than in 2021, a decrease of 1.5 percent.

Nationally, drug overdose deaths also appear to be slowing. The CDC estimates there were 107,735 U.S. overdose deaths in the 12-month period ending in July 2022, down from over 110,000 deaths in the 12-month period that ended in March, 2022. Illicit fentanyl, a synthetic opioid about 50 to 100 times more potent than morphine, is involved in the vast majority of those deaths.

Deaths in Massachusetts involving a fentanyl have been rising for over a decade, from nearly 42% of opioid-related overdoses in 2014 to 94% this year. Over that same period, deaths involving prescription opioids such as oxycodone and hydrocodone have steadily declined from about 35% to 11% of overdoses in 2022.

More people are now dying in Massachusetts after ingesting fentanyl, cocaine, alcohol or benzodiazepines such as Xanax than from pain medication. Deaths linked to opioid medication fell by 30% in just one year, which coincides with a steep decline in prescriptions in Massachusetts over the past decade.   

Drugs Involved in Massachusetts Opioid-Related Overdose Deaths

Massachusetts Department of Public Health

“Every life lost to opioid overdose is its own tragedy,” Public Health Commissioner Margret Cooke said in a statement. “With this report, we are encouraged by the decrease, however modest, in opioid-related overdose deaths in Massachusetts so far this year. We will continue to build on our data-driven and equity-based public health approach as we address the impacts of the opioid epidemic and the COVID-19 pandemic, especially among vulnerable populations.”

Health officials say the illicit drug supply in Massachusetts is “heavily contaminated” with illicit fentanyl, which is frequently used in the manufacture of counterfeit medication sold on the street.

Pharmaceutical fentanyl is used as a surgical analgesic and in patches and lozenges to treat severe pain, but only small amounts are diverted for abuse. The DEA estimates that only 0.01% of prescription fentanyl is diverted for use by someone it was not intended for.

It's important to note that the presence of a drug found in a toxicology screen doesn’t mean it was the cause of someone’s death. Multiples substances are frequently involved in opioid overdoses, and the official cause of death is a clinical decision made by coroners and medical examiners.

Toxicology tests alone also don’t reveal if a prescribed drug was intended for the decedent, or if it was bought, stolen or borrowed by them. An earlier study of drug deaths in Massachusetts found that only 1.3% of overdose victims had a prescription for the opioid medication involved in their deaths.

The vast majority of patients prescribed opioids use them responsibly and don’t go doctor shopping. The Massachusetts Department of Public Health estimates that only 0.6% of patients who were prescribed an opioid this year had an “activity of concern,” such as getting prescriptions from multiple providers or having them filled at multiple pharmacies.