Nearly 85% of U.S. Overdose Deaths Linked to Street Drugs

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

A new report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows that the vast majority of drug overdose deaths in the United States involve illicit fentanyl and other street drugs.  

The study, reported in the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, analyzed data from 24 states and the District of Columbia enrolled in the State Unintentional Drug Overdose Reporting System (SUDORS) from January to June, 2019. SUDORS captures detailed information from toxicology reports and death scene investigations, and is considered more reliable than overdose data gathered from death certificates.

Among the 16,236 overdose deaths reported by SUDOR during the study period, illicitly manufactured fentanyl (IMF), heroin, cocaine or methamphetamine were involved 83.8% of deaths, either alone or in combination with other drugs. Nearly half of those deaths involved two or more illicit drugs.

About one in five overdoses involved prescription opioids such as hydrocodone, oxycodone, morphine and buprenorphine. The study did not indicate whether the medication was obtained legally or if it was borrowed, stolen or purchased illicitly. What is clear, however, is that street drugs are the primary driver of the U.S. overdose crisis.

% RATE OF DRUGS INVOLVED IN FATAL OVERDOSES (JAN-JUNE, 2019)

SOURCE: CDC

“The finding of this report that nearly 85% of overdose deaths involved IMFs, heroin, cocaine, or methamphetamine reflects rapid and continuing increases in the supply of IMFs and methamphetamine, coupled with illicit co-use of opioids and stimulants,” researchers reported.

More than two thirds (68.5%) of overdose victims were male, and over half (53.3%) were 25 to 44 years of age; demographics that don’t fit the profile of most chronic pain patients, who are generally older and female.

NBER Report Blames Rx Opioids

The new CDC report is at odds with a working paper recently published by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), a non-profit, private think tank. The NBER report largely blames prescription opioids for the U.S. overdose epidemic – not street drugs or so-called “deaths of despair” caused by rising social isolation and economic distress.  

“People have blamed all sorts of things, heroin from Mexico and fentanyl from China and economic decline and so on and so forth,” co-author Janet Currie, PhD, a professor of economics at Princeton University, told Yahoo Finance. “But really the issue is that a whole lot of people got addicted because they were prescribed pain medications which aren’t prescribed in the same way in other countries.”

Currie and co-author Hannes Schwandt, PhD, an economics professor at Northwestern University, say pharmaceutical companies aggressively marketed opioids at a time when doctors were being encouraged to treat pain as “the fifth vital sign.”

“We argue that the development and marketing of a new generation of prescription opioids sparked the epidemic and that provider behavior is still helping to drive it,” the NBER report states. “Prior to the marketing push, most doctors had believed that opioids were too addictive and dangerous for anyone except terminally ill patients. Aggressive marketing by pharmaceutical companies changed those perceptions: Sales of opioid pain killers quadrupled between 1999 and 2013, fueling the rise in overdose deaths.”

What Curry and Schwandt fail to mention is that opioid prescriptions have fallen by nearly 40% since 2013. And their report only briefly mentions the rising toll taken by illicit fentanyl and other street drugs.

Fatal drug overdoses fell in 2018, for the first time in nearly 30 years, but many signs indicate they are rising again and that the COVID-19 pandemic is making the crisis worse in the U.S. and Canada.   

Canada’s Chief Public Health Officer recently warned the pandemic is fueling another surge in drug deaths in Canada.

“Tragically, in many regions of the country, the COVID-19 pandemic is contributing to an increase in drug-related overdoses and deaths,” Dr. Theresa Tam said in a statement. “There are indications that the street drug supply is growing more unpredictable and toxic in some parts of the country, as previous supply chains have been disrupted by travel restrictions and border measures. Public health measures designed to reduce the impact of COVID-19 may increase isolation, stress and anxiety as well as put a strain on the supports for persons who use drugs.”

A Pained Life: Don’t Throw Out the Bathwater

By Carol Levy, PNN Columnist

In 1976, my trigeminal neuralgia started. In those days, the environment regarding chronic pain was very different. My doctor had only one agenda: He wanted to stop or reduce my constant debilitating and disabling pain.

He couldn’t cure me, so he ordered opioid pain medication. When one opioid didn’t work, he tried another; Darvon, Percocet, Percodan, Demerol. So many I can’t recall them all. When none helped, he prescribed an 8-ounce bottle of opium.

The first pharmacist who saw the opium prescription shook his head. “Sorry. We don't carry it,” he said. The next pharmacy did. “Have a seat. It'll just be a few minutes,” the pharmacist said.

I wasn't looked at askance. No questions were asked about my doctor or diagnosis. I wasn’t warned: “This is a very strong drug. You need to be careful. You could become addicted.”

They trusted that my doctor knew what he was doing. They trusted me to be a responsible patient. I doubt it ever entered the pharmacist’s mind that I might be a drug seeker or abuser.

Now the tables have totally turned. Many of us get questioned by pharmacists. And some of our doctors have stopped writing opioid prescriptions. They should be cautious, right? Because opioids are addictive, you can become dependent or have other bad side effects. And they can be used illegally.

The same is true for steroids. Yet there seem to be no politicians, physicians or groups with an agenda that are working to scare the public about steroids or trying to get doctors to stop “overprescribing” them.  

When steroids first came out there were many, many horror stories about them. The 1956 film Bigger Than Life was about a school teacher (James Mason) taking corticosteroids. They helped his pain from an autoimmune disorder, but he soon became hyper-manic and ultimately psychotic, even trying to murder his son.

His doctor reduced the dosage, but because steroids helped his pain, the teacher continued to take more than prescribed. He even goes to another town, impersonates a doctor, and writes a fake prescription to obtain more of the pills.

Sound familiar?

The movie was a caricature of the potential risks of steroids, which include dependency and addiction. Opioids have the same risks, but most patients with chronic pain take them responsibly, as most on steroids do, and they do not become addicted, try to obtain them fraudulently or go off the deep end.

There will always be bad actors who will be irresponsible, but users of any medication should not be demonized because of a few bad apples. Steroids are easily obtained and the patients who use them are not seen as potential felons. And why would they? For most patients, steroids can be very helpful.

Those who can still get opioids for their pain are often seen as potential miscreants. Yet studies also show that for most patients, opioids do help.

You don’t throw out the baby with the bathwater. You don’t create guidelines scaring doctors into not writing steroid prescriptions because a small percentage of people will misuse or abuse them.

The medical community and the government need to stop throwing out the bathwater. When they refuse to write prescriptions for opioids that have helped patients, the side effect — intentional or not — is to throw us away, too.

Carol Jay Levy has lived with trigeminal neuralgia, a chronic facial pain disorder, for over 30 years. She is the author of “A Pained Life, A Chronic Pain Journey.”  Carol is the moderator of the Facebook support group “Women in Pain Awareness.” Her blog “The Pained Life” can be found here.

Meeting the Doctor Who Helped Me Most

By Barby Ingle, PNN Columnist

In honor of September being Pain Awareness Month, I wanted to give homage to the doctor who helped me most over the past 20 years. He was in my life for about 6 years of this journey, before he retired, but he has given me tools for a lifetime.

When I arrived at Dr. Robert Schwartzman’s office for the first time, I was excited. I had met him a few years prior at a medical conference, where he agreed to treat me. Dr. Schwartzman is one of the world’s leading experts on Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD), also known as Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS). Due to high demand from other patients, there was a waiting list to see him.

I was in my wheelchair and had made the trip to Pennsylvania from Virginia, where I was staying with my sister and her husband. At the time, I was hurting all over and many of my symptoms were flaring due to the travel.  I had many types of pain going on: burning, stabbing, electric, shooting, deep, surface and bone pain. I was dizzy and felt nauseated.

My name was called and my sister and I went to the exam room. The nurse was very nice and asked all the right questions. She had me put on a gown. Then we waited.

When Dr. Schwartzman walked into the exam room to see me, he was followed by about 9 student doctors. His first words were, “Now she has Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy. Anyone should be able to see it at first glance.” He then began pointing out all of the symptoms I had from the RSD. He knew things before I even said anything.

The doctors saw the blanching in my skin. From my face to my feet, I had discoloration. I never paid that much attention to how bad it had gotten over the years; maybe because it happened over time. I took pictures of it, but did not know that it meant RSD had spread to those areas.

The most severe burning pain was on the right side of my body. I had all the other types of pain on the left side, but the atrophy and lack of coordination were not as bad.

DR. ROBERT SCHWARTZMAN

When Dr. Schwartzman began to do neurological testing on both sides, I felt the pain. The right side was worse, but the left side was definitely affected. He discussed me being diagnosed incorrectly by my other doctors with Thoracic Outlet Syndrome and having my rib removed twice. He also guessed correctly that I had been diagnosed with temporomandibular joint dysfunction (TMJD) because of the facial pain and that I was having issues with my thyroid.

He remarked about my sweating, the swelling in some areas, and asked about my low-grade fevers, Horner syndrome and more. He discussed and noted the atrophy in my hands, arms, legs, feet, face, back and the dystonia in my hands and feet. By discussed, I mean he discussed it with the other doctors. Dr. Schwartzman hardly spoke to me.

Next, he had me do neurological tests. An easy one that you can do right now involves your hand. Take the tip of your index finger and tap it to the tip of your thumb as many times and as fast as you can. I thought that I did it very well, especially with my left hand. But Dr. Schwartzman explained the way I did it was awkward and slow, which was another symptom.

I did not understand, so he showed me. He could tap his fingers so fast that it looked like I was going in slow motion. Since then, when I ask others to do the same thing, I am amazed that I cannot go as fast, no matter how hard I try.

He watched me smile, had me stick my tongue out, and then asked if I had trouble swallowing and if my voice goes in and out sometimes. I said, "Yes, how did you know?" He said that the RSD was affecting my throat and intestines.

I had been diagnosed with gastrointestinal ischemia and gastroparesis a few years earlier. The hospitalist that performed the tests said there is a section of my intestines that was getting little to no blood. I did not understand how that was related to the RSD until I saw Dr. Schwartzman and learned that RSD causes vascular constriction, which can make it difficult to get an IV line inserted or even do blood tests.

I never realized that vascular constriction could also affect organs. I thought I was just eating too quickly or being lazy when I choked on food. I did not know why my voice changed or why I would lose it sometimes. The RSD even affected the way my nails and hair grow.

Dr. Schwartzman was spot on with everything. He added that whiplash or brachia plexus injuries are a leading cause of upper extremity RSD. Because of my additional traumas and surgeries, the RSD had spread.

Ketamine Infusions

Sometime near the end of the exam, Dr. Schwartzman said to the student doctors, “The only thing that will help this patient 100% is the coma treatment.”

I was shocked. I thought I was going to be getting outpatient ketamine infusions. I began to tear up. I kept telling myself not to cry. It is never good to cry at a doctor’s office. I wanted to be taken seriously and be strong. As soon as they left the room, tears flowed down my face. The nurse said she would be right back with all of the instructions and scripts that he was giving me.

I did not have any idea of the issues that were involved with RSD or that I had many of the symptoms. Instead of starting right away, I had to wait another 9 months to get a bed in the hospital, where I underwent 7 days of inpatient ICU ketamine infusions.

I went into the hospital in a wheelchair, but walked out on my own a week later, ready to live the next chapter in my life. That was Dec. 14, 2009. I still undergo ketamine infusion therapy about 4 times a year for booster treatments, but I am no longer on daily medications for pain.

I thank Dr. Schwartzman and all the research doctors out there coming up with treatments and scientific data for people like me with chronic rare diseases and severe life changing pain. We should always remember there is reason for hope. We just have to be active in seeking and using all of the resources available.

Barby Ingle lives with reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD), migralepsy and endometriosis. Barby is a chronic pain educator, patient advocate, and president of the International Pain Foundation. She is also a motivational speaker and best-selling author on pain topics. More information about Barby can be found at her website.  

Lupus and Arthritis Patients at No Greater Risk from COVID-19

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Patients with lupus and other forms of arthritis are not at increased risk of being hospitalized with COVID-19 due to medications that weaken their immune systems, according to researchers at NYU’s Grossman School of Medicine.

Lupus, spondyloarthritis, psoriatic and rheumatoid arthritis are autoimmune conditions in which the body’s immune system attacks joints, skin, kidneys and other tissues, causing pain and inflammation. The arthritic conditions are often treated with steroids, biologics and other immune suppressing medications, which has raised concern that the drugs could also make patients more susceptible to risks from coronavirus infection.

But in two studies recently published in the journal Arthritis and Rheumatology, researchers found that most patients with arthritis had the same risk of hospitalization as the general population.

“People with lupus or inflammatory arthritis have the same risk factors for getting seriously ill from COVID-19 as people without these disorders,” said co-author Ruth Fernandez-Ruiz, MD, a postdoctoral fellow in rheumatology in the Department of Medicine at NYU Langone.

The first study involved 226 adult patients in New York City who were being treated for mild to severe forms of lupus between April 13 and June 1, when the coronavirus pandemic peaked in the New York City region. Forty-one of the lupus patients were also diagnosed with COVID-19. Of those, 24 were hospitalized and four died. Another 42 patients had COVID-19-like symptoms but were not formally tested.

The second study involved 103 women being treated for inflammatory arthritis between March 3 and May 4 in New York City. All tested positive for COVID-19 or had symptoms highly suggesting they were infected. Twenty-seven of them were hospitalized and four died.

Researchers say the lupus patients taking immune-suppressing medications such as mycophenolate mofetil (Cellcept) and azathioprine (Imuran), had no greater risk of hospitalization than patients not using the drugs. Similarly, hospitalization rates for people with inflammatory arthritis and COVID-19 were no greater than for all New Yorkers.

“Patients receiving therapy for lupus and inflammatory arthritis should not automatically stop taking their medications for fear that they would be worse off if they also caught the coronavirus,” said co-author Rebecca Haberman, MD, a clinical instructor in rheumatology in the Department of Medicine at NYU Langone.

Haberman and her colleagues say arthritis patients taking biologic drugs such as adalimumab (Humira) and etanercept (Enbrel), or the antiviral drug hydroxychloroquine, were also at no greater or lesser risk of hospitalization than those not taking the drugs.

However, arthritis patients taking glucocorticoids, a type of steroid, even in mild doses, were up to 10 times more likely to be hospitalized than patients not using steroids. The researchers caution that although statistically significant, the study’s small size may overestimate the actual risk from steroids.

“Our findings represent the largest of its kind for American patients with lupus or arthritis and COVID-19, and should reassure most patients, especially those on immunosuppressant therapy, that they are at no greater risk of having to be admitted to hospital from COVID-19 than other lupus or arthritis patients,” said Fernandez-Ruiz.

Risk factors that can double the risk of hospitalization from COVID-19 are having multiple health conditions, such as obesity, hypertension and diabetes.

Can LSD Be Used to Treat Pain?

By Roger Chriss, PNN Columnist

The well-known hallucinogen LSD may have a new use. A new study published in the Journal of Psychopharmacology found evidence that LSD exerts a “protracted analgesic effect” at low doses.

The study was performed in The Netherlands on 24 healthy volunteers. Three low doses of LSD or placebo were given to the participants, who immersed a hand in near freezing water 90 minutes and five hours after dosing to assess their pain tolerance.

Results from the “Cold Pressor Test” showed that 20 micrograms of LSD “significantly increased the time that participants were able to tolerate exposure to cold (3°C) water and decreased their subjective levels of experienced pain and unpleasantness.”

It is not clear how or why LSD increased tolerance to cold water. The study authors speculate about LSD’s various actions on serotonin receptors, but also note that “an additional or alternative explanation for the analgesic effects of LSD could be hypertension-associated hypoalgesia.”

There were side effects from LSD, even at low doses. LSD slightly raised blood pressure and increased feelings of dissociation, anxiety and somatization in the volunteers. Psychological and cognitive effects were described as “very mild.”

The study has other important limitations. The Cold Pressor Test is not a good analog for real-world acute pain. And healthy volunteers in such studies tend not to be typical of the population at large. They skew young, male, and often have prior experience with the substance being evaluated that most people do not have.

Also, these studies tend not to translate to real-world use. Recent work on LSD microdosing has found “few benefits and significant downsides.”

Findings Hyped

Unfortunately, this preliminary study has already led to hype about the analgesic potential of LSD. New Atlas called it  “an incredible, first-of-its kind trial” and Futurism reported that LSD microdoses were “as effective as opioids at treating pain.”  Interesting Engineering predicted “there could be possible applications of LSD as a non-addictive pain medication.”

The Beckley Foundation, which funded the study, fed the hype with a news release that claimed the analgesic effects of LSD were “remarkably” similar to oxycodone and morphine, but without the risk of addiction.

“The present data suggests low doses of LSD could constitute a useful pain management treatment option that is not only effective in patients but is also devoid of the problematic consequences associated with current mainstay drugs, such as opioids,” said Amanda Feilding, Founder and Director of the Beckley Foundation. “We must continue to explore this with the aim of providing safer, non-addictive alternatives to pain management, and to bring people in pain a step closer to living happier, healthier and fully expressed lives.”

Misunderstanding Pain Research

The Cold Pressor Test is a standard way to assess pain threshold and tolerance. But results in the test vary significantly with water temperature, and the test is not seen as a precise analog with real-world pain. As a 2016 review noted, “No single experimental model can mimic the complex nature of clinical pain.”

Pain is a biopsychosocial phenomenon involving a long chain of interactions that start with peripheral sensory nerve endings and manifest in the conscious mind. Analgesic effect can be achieved locally in nerve endings, as seen with lidocaine injections; or intermediately in the spinal cord, as seen with radio frequency ablation or spinal cord simulators; or centrally in the brain, as seen with psychoactive drugs.

Therefore, comparing analgesic efficacy is far more complex than just looking at outcomes in a simple lab-induced pain model in a handful of healthy people. The LSD study did not test its subjects with multiple substances or combinations of substances.

Further, analgesics have to be safe and effective. Safety includes understanding possible drug-drug interactions. A 2008 review noted that “lithium and some tricyclic antidepressants have also been reported to increase the effects of LSD.”

A 2019 study describes several important biochemical pathways and gene polymorphisms in LSD metabolism, possibly affecting pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The article concludes that “drug-drug interaction studies in humans are required to further assess the clinical relevance of these findings.”

Analgesics like acetaminophen have relatively few drug-drug interactions. Opioids have a number of important ones, but these are well-understood and can be controlled. By contrast, cannabis is messy. Drugs.com lists 24 major and 353 moderate interactions for cannabis. There is no such list for LSD.

Pain medication needs to be effective as well as safe and reliable. Demonstrating efficacy requires far more than a handful of willing subjects being subjected to a simulated pain experience in a laboratory setting. Demonstrating safety and reliability will require extensive testing, pharmacodynamic studies, and research on drug-drug interactions. LSD may have taken the first step toward becoming an analgesic, but there is a long road ahead.

Roger Chriss lives with Ehlers Danlos syndrome and is a proud member of the Ehlers-Danlos Society. Roger is a technical consultant in Washington state, where he specializes in mathematics and research. 

CDC Is Prioritizing Politics Over Science

By Dr. Lynn Webster, PNN Columnist

For most of my career, I have revered the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). I believed it had the best scientists in the world, and that we could and should believe everything they said.

Not anymore. Unfortunately, the CDC has devolved into a partisan mouthpiece for politicians and people with agendas not supported by science.

The Academy Award-winning documentary Under Our Skin first showed me how politics can influence decisions at the CDC. The film illustrates how chronic Lyme disease (CLD) can cause a great deal of suffering, including chronic pain and fatigue. But the medical community has been unwilling to respond appropriately because the government has determined that CLD is a "controversial" diagnosis.

As a result, patients with Lyme disease often go undiagnosed and untreated until their symptoms worsen. The ongoing "Lyme wars" make it difficult for them to get testing and treatment.

Contagion is a theatrical movie about a pandemic that shows the CDC making decisions based on the political aspirations of key CDC officers. But this fictional story about a pandemic and the power-seeking nature of CDC officials was unfortunately prescient.

CDC Has Done Better

We have seen the tremendous work the CDC can do worldwide. The Ebola virus was contained, and potentially millions of lives were saved, because of the stellar work of enormously talented and dedicated CDC scientists.

The CDC activated its Emergency Response Center to protect the United States and its territories from the threat of the Zika virus, which can cause birth defects and Guillain-Barré Syndrome. My childbearing-age daughter cancelled trips to areas that the CDC warned posed a high risk.

The agency conducted more than 160,000 Zika virus tests, created registries to track pregnant women who were known to be infected with the virus, and provided $251 million in grants to state and local health departments. Their ongoing efforts to minimize the damage from Zika demonstrates the exemplary work the CDC can perform.

CDC's Politicization Is Not Partisan

The politicizing of the CDC is nothing new. During the Obama administration, the CDC became a tool of anti-opioid zealots. Republican Rep. Harold (Hal) Rogers of Kentucky is a senior member of the House Appropriations Committee. You may have heard his name recently, because he helped determine the amount of the CDC's emergency funding for the coronavirus.  

President Obama joined Rogers at the National RX Drug Abuse and Heroin Summit in 2016 to support increased funding to address prescription drug abuse. That action ignored the larger problem of illicit drug abuse and the fact that the opioid crisis has been mischaracterized as a prescription drug problem.

CDC Harmed Millions With Its Opioid Guideline

When Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing (PROP), an anti-opioid activist group, was unable to get what they demanded from the FDA through a citizen petition, they turned to the CDC, where they found political allies. This led to the now infamous CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain in 2016. 

The guideline has caused enormous harm to millions of Americans. Recently, the American Medical Association implored the CDC to significantly change the guideline "to protect patients with pain from the ongoing unintended consequences and misapplication of the guidance." Even the guideline’s authors have backpedaled, acknowledging it has been misapplied to withhold opioid medication from patients who need it.

Yet the harm continues. Alarmingly, the Department of Justice interprets the guideline as a mandate, warning and sometimes prosecuting doctors who do not follow its voluntary recommendations. Dozens of states have blindly adopted the guideline in a naïve attempt to address the rising number of drug overdose deaths, either not understanding or ignoring the fact that most overdoses are due to illicit, rather than prescription drugs. 

COVID-19 Flip Flops

Now we see the CDC yo-yoing with their recommendations regarding COVID-19. Initially, the CDC said that masks were not necessary, except for those who were sick or taking care of someone who was sick. Now they recommend that everyone wear a mask. The Trump administration wants to leave that decision up to individuals, so they have not issued a federal mask mandate. This is contrary to the advice of most experts.

The CDC has also stated that testing for COVID-19 is important. But when the administration apparently pressured the CDC to change their position and recommend that asymptomatic people who were exposed to the virus not get tested, they did so, allowing politics to trump (no pun intended) science. CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfeld has now reversed his position and said COVID-19 testing is important for those who have been exposed to the virus, even if they are asymptomatic.

I agree with Dr. Leana Wen, a well-recognized authority on public health, who wrote in The Washington Post that the CDC’s testing guidance was “nonsensical.”

"I worry that this CDC change is part of a larger pattern of diluting recommendations when the federal government can’t do its job properly," Wen wrote.

Perhaps we all should worry. Who and what are we to believe? I, for one, can no longer believe what the CDC says unless it is verified by non-partisan scientific bodies.

This is a sad time. Our health is being played with as if it were a game. I feel like a commoner in Game of Thrones, as the kings fight for power and ignore their people. We, the commoners, should insist that the CDC become an independent agency no longer headed by a political appointee, so it would be unassailable by politicians who are more interested in controlling messages than diseases. 

Lynn R. Webster, MD, is a vice president of scientific affairs for PRA Health Sciences and consults with the pharmaceutical industry. He is author of the award-winning book The Painful Truth, and co-producer of the documentary It Hurts Until You Die. Opinions expressed here are those of the author alone and do not reflect the views or policy of PRA Health Sciences. You can find him on Twitter: @LynnRWebsterMD.

This Is a Good Year to Get a Flu Shot

By Julie Appleby and Michelle Andrews, Kaiser Health News

Flu season will look different this year, as the U.S. grapples with a coronavirus pandemic that has killed more than 180,000 people. Many Americans are reluctant to visit a doctor’s office and public health officials worry people will shy away from being immunized.

Although sometimes incorrectly regarded as just another bad cold, flu also kills tens of thousands of people in the U.S. each year, with the very young, the elderly and those with underlying conditions the most vulnerable. When coupled with the effects of COVID-19, public health experts say it’s more important than ever to get a flu shot.

If enough of the U.S. population gets vaccinated — more than the 45% who did last flu season — it could help head off a nightmare scenario in the coming winter of hospitals stuffed with both COVID-19 patients and those suffering from severe effects of influenza.

Aside from the potential burden on hospitals, there’s the possibility people could get both viruses — and “no one knows what happens if you get influenza and COVID [simultaneously] because it’s never happened before,” Dr. Rachel Levine, Pennsylvania’s secretary of health, told reporters this month.

In response, manufacturers are producing more vaccine supply this year, between 194 million and 198 million doses, or about 20 million more than they distributed last season, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

As flu season approaches, here are some answers to a few common questions:

When should I get my flu shot?

Advertising has already begun, and some pharmacies and clinics have their supplies now. But, because the effectiveness of the vaccine can wane over time, the CDC recommends against a shot in August.

Many pharmacies and clinics will start immunizations in early September. Generally, influenza viruses start circulating in mid- to late October but become more widespread later, in the winter. It takes about two weeks after getting a shot for antibodies — which circulate in the blood and thwart infections — to build up.

“Young, healthy people can begin getting their flu shots in September, and elderly people and other vulnerable populations can begin in October,” said Dr. Steve Miller, chief clinical officer for insurer Cigna.

The CDC has recommended that people get a flu vaccine by the end of October, but noted it’s not too late to get one after that because shots can still be beneficial and vaccination should be offered throughout the flu season. Even so, some experts say not to wait too long — not only because of COVID-19, but in case a shortage develops because of overwhelming demand.

While a flu shot won’t prevent COVID-19, getting one could help your doctors differentiate between the diseases if you develop any symptoms — fever, cough, sore throat — that they share.

Getting a shot protects you from catching the flu and spreading it to others, which may help lessen the burden on hospitals and medical staffs. A flu shot won’t prevent all cases of the flu, but getting vaccinated can lessen the severity if you do fall ill. You cannot get influenza from the flu vaccine.

All eligible people, especially essential workers, those with underlying conditions and those at higher risk — including very young children and pregnant women — should seek protection, the CDC said. It recommends that children over 6 months old get vaccinated.

How effective is this year’s vaccine?

Flu vaccines — which must be developed anew each year because influenza viruses mutate — range in effectiveness annually, depending on how well they match the circulating virus. Last year’s formulation was estimated to be about 45% effective in preventing the flu overall, with about a 55% effectiveness in children.

The vaccines available in the U.S. this year are aimed at preventing at least three strains of the virus, and most cover four. It isn’t yet known how well this year’s supply will match the strains that will circulate in the U.S.

Early indications from the Southern Hemisphere, which goes through its flu season during our summer, are encouraging. There, people practiced social distancing, wore masks and got vaccinated in greater numbers this year — and global flu levels are lower than expected. Experts caution, however, not to count on a similarly mild season in the U.S., in part because masking and social distancing efforts vary widely.

Where can I get a flu shot?

Aiming to avoid risky indoor gatherings, many employers are reluctant to sponsor the on-site flu clinics they’ve offered in years past. And with so many people continuing to work from home, there’s less need to bring flu shots to employees on the job. Instead, many employers are encouraging workers to get shots from their primary care doctors, at pharmacies or in other community settings. Insurance will generally cover the cost of the vaccine.

Some pharmacies are making an extra push to get out into the community to offer flu shots.

Walgreens, which has nearly 9,100 pharmacies nationwide, is continuing a partnership begun in 2015 with community organizations, churches and employers that has offered about 150,000 off-site and mobile flu clinics to date. Walgreens began offering flu shots in mid-August and is encouraging people not to delay getting vaccinated.

Both Walgreens and CVS are encouraging people to schedule appointments and do paperwork online this year to minimize time spent in the stores. At CVS MinuteClinic locations, once patients have checked in for their flu shot, they must wait outside or in their car, since the indoor waiting areas are now closed.

“We don’t have tons of arrows in our quiver against COVID,” said Dr. Kevin Ban, Walgreens’ chief medical officer. “Taking pressure off the health care system by providing vaccines in advance is one thing we can do.”

Kaiser Health News (KHN) is a national health policy news service. It is an editorially independent program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, which is not affiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

NIH Study Finds Opioids Make Birds Sing

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Opioid medication has been associated with many things, from reduced pain and disability to constipation, addiction and overdoses. A new study has found that opioids also make birds sing.

Researchers at the University of Wisconsin-Madison say fentanyl, a potent synthetic opioid, causes “gregarious singing behavior” in starlings that sounds a bit like modern jazz. Starlings usually sing to attract mates, but these birds sang because they felt good.

“When I listen to these birds sing, it seems as if they are enjoying themselves,” Lauren Riters, PhD, a Psychology Professor at UW-Madison told Psychology Today. “To me, it sounds like free-form jazz riffs.”

The small study by Riters and her colleagues involved a total of 14 European starlings that were injected with either a placebo or small doses of fentanyl. Their findings, recently published in the journal Scientific Reports, suggest that fentanyl reduced stress and anxiety in the birds without making them intoxicated.

“We report that peripheral injections of the selective MOR (mu opioid receptor) agonist fentanyl cause dose-dependent increases in gregarious singing behavior in male and female starlings, while at the same time decreasing beak wiping, which is considered a sign of stress or anxiety. The fentanyl did not affect landings, indicating that fentanyl effects on behavior were not caused by gross deficits in motor activity,” Riters wrote.

Riters is a prolific researcher, participating in dozens of studies on the social activity of starlings, pigeons, quail, finches and other birds, much of it paid for with millions of dollars in federal grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

This particular study was funded by a $338,000 NIH grant to examine “deficits in social communication.” The researchers say their findings could someday be used to treat humans suffering from autism, depression and anxiety. Not to make them sing, but to make them more social.

“Such disorders are characterized by social withdrawal and deficits in the ability to communicate appropriately in distinct social contexts. The proposed research will identify manipulations that stimulate context-appropriate social interactions, which can be used in the design of clinical interventions in humans with context-specific deficits in social communication,” the UW-Madison grant application states.

Some may scoff at her research, but Riters says there are lessons to be learned from it because songbirds, like humans, are social animals that enjoy singing for the same reasons we do: It helps us feel better.

“If this is the case, it would mean that our studies on songbirds are revealing an ancient, evolutionarily conserved neural circuit that regulates intrinsically rewarded social behaviors across many animals,’ she said.

Lawyers May Not Expand Lawsuits Against Pharmacy Chains

By Pat Anson, Editor, PNN Editor

Lawyers involved in class action lawsuits that allege pain patients were discriminated against by three major pharmacy chains are being tight-lipped about whether the lawsuits may be expanded to include additional plaintiffs and pharmacies.

The lawsuits were filed earlier this month in California and Rhode Island against CVS, Walgreens and Costco on behalf of two women who say the pharmacies refused to fill their prescriptions for opioid pain medication.

At least six different law firms around the country are handling the cases. They’ve set up a website called Seeking Justice for Pain Patients, which invites other patients to participate in the lawsuits by sharing their personal information and experiences at pharmacies. It’s not yet clear how the information will be used or if the cases will be expanded.

“Pain patients have been contacting us in response to the lawsuits. The overall response has been very positive and happy that some action is being taken,” Robert Redfearn, a Louisiana attorney, said in an email to PNN. “Though there are no plans to do so at this time, additional individual named plaintiffs could possibly be added, but if a national class is certified, it should not be necessary.” 

Other lawyers involved in the lawsuits did not respond to requests for comment.

Redfearn represents Susan Smith, a 43-year old mother from Castro Valley, California who lives with severe chronic migraines. The only medications that give her relief from head pain are opioids. Smith says pharmacists at Walgreens and Costco refused to fill her opioid prescriptions and publicly shamed her.

“After being harassed by pharmacists [and] pharmacy staff for a number of years — being laughed at, being called names in front of my child — I really couldn’t take it anymore,” Smith told the San Francisco Examiner. “It has been really stressful, demoralizing, not to mention discriminating. On top of that, they were making it really hard for me to live a pain-free life.”

‘Find a New Pharmacy’

“There has to be a change,” says Edith Fuog, a 48-year old Tampa, Florida mother who filed the lawsuit against CVS. Fuog has lived for many years with trigeminal neuralgia, lupus, arthritis and other chronic pain conditions.

“People need to understand what is happening. Everybody in their life is going to be a pain patient at one point or another, whether it’s an accident, becoming elderly, a disease or cancer. If this is happening to people who have chronic pain, the people who are just coming in with acute pain are never going to be treated.”

Fuog told PNN she had no trouble getting her opioid prescriptions filled at a CVS pharmacy until the CDC’s controversial opioid prescribing guideline was released in 2016.

“As soon as those guidelines came out, my life changed. The manager pulled me aside and said, ‘Look, I’m not going to be able to fill these anymore. I suggest you find a new pharmacy.’” said Fuog, who then went to other CVS pharmacies in the Tampa area and was repeatedly turned down.

“They all said, ‘We’ll be happy to fill all your other meds, but we will not fill the opioids.’ And I said, ‘I take 13 other medications. Why would I come here then?’”

EDITH FUOG

Fuog eventually found a small neighborhood pharmacy that was willing to fill all of her prescriptions. She also found a lawyer to file the class action lawsuit against CVS. If her case is successful, Fuog anticipates making only a few thousand dollars in damages.

“It’s not like I’m going to make a bunch of money. The decision could come down for a hundred million dollars, but that’s for the class and the attorneys. I’ll get a ‘rep fee” being the class rep. That’s it. I don’t get anything for my damages or the stress I go through, and the fact I have severe anxiety because of this,” she said.

Fuog says she will only settle out-of-court if CVS adopts a written public policy that makes clear to its pharmacists that they should fill all legitimate prescriptions for opioids.

“My goal in this is to make change that affects the most amount of people with chronic pain. If I can get them a lot of money, I’m going to do it. Why wouldn’t I? To me, these companies deserve to pay all these people money for what they’ve been through,” she said.

Costco, CVS and Walgreens did not respond to requests for comment.  CVS, Walgreens and other large pharmacy chains have been named in lawsuits alleging they helped fuel the opioid epidemic by selling millions of pills in small communities. They’ve also been fined hundreds of millions of dollars for violating federal rules for dispensing controlled substances.

Most Americans Know Little About Opioid Medication

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Before the Covid-19 pandemic dominated the nation’s headlines, the opioid crisis was widely considered the most serious public health threat in the United States, with much of the news coverage and public attitudes focused on the role played by opioid pain medication.

A 2017 Pew Research survey found that 3 out of 4 Americans viewed prescription drug abuse as a serious public health problem. Another survey that year found that nearly half of Americans had a family member or close friend addicted to drugs.

It turns out most Americans know surprisingly little about opioid medication. A recent survey of over 1,000 U.S. adults by DrFirst, a healthcare technology company, found a significant lack of understanding about opioids.      

While more than three-quarters (76%) of respondents think they know whether or not they were prescribed an opioid, only 22% could correctly identify seven commonly prescribed opioid painkillers. The following medications were misidentified as not containing opioids:

• Tramadol (44%)

• Hydromorphone (32%)

• Morphine sulfate (27%)

• Methadone (27%)

• Hydrocodone (23%)

• Fentanyl (22%)

• Oxycodone (15%)

Many respondents also misidentified non-opioid medications. Nearly three quarters (73%) thought oxytocin was an opioid (apparently confusing it with oxycodone), even though it’s a hormone that helps women bond with their newborn babies.

Other medications that were often misidentified as opioids:    

• Oxymetolazine (56%)

• Trazodone (46%)

• Omeprazole (33%)

• Hydrocortisone (31%)

• Hyaluronic acid (23%)

“American consumers have some significant and dangerous misunderstandings about which medicines contain opioids,” said Colin Banas, MD, vice-president of clinical products for DrFirst. “This is concerning because patients need to know if they are prescribed an opioid so they can use and store it safely. It should be a wake-up call to physicians and pharmacists, who should not assume their patients know this information.”

One out of five survey respondents said they had been prescribed an opioid in the past year, but 21% of them said they didn’t get the prescription filled.

Over three-quarters of those who did get their prescriptions filled did not keep their opioids in a locked cabinet, as some safety experts recommend. Most kept the drugs within easy reach.

• In a locked cabinet (23%)

• On a nightstand table (14%)

• Kitchen table (13%)

• Bathroom cabinet (13%)

• Purse or backpack (10%)

• Bathroom counter (10%)

The DrFirst survey of 1,002 American adults was conducted online by Propeller Insights from June 16 to June 19, 2020.

Pain Is Not a Competition

By Mia Maysack, PNN Columnist

A question I've often encountered is, “Why make pain political?”

Here's a newsflash for everyone:  It was created that way. And not initially by us, I might add.  

Despite having lived with chronic head pain every single day for over 20 years, I’m still fighting for a proper diagnosis. The more tests, appointments, examinations and permission slips I get only feeds into the perpetual cycle of phone tag, hold music and Zoom links. Not to mention pandemic induced anxiety.

It's all done in the name of “patient centeredness,” but I find it all confining and traumatizing.     

This has led to me visiting with healthcare providers very minimally. I’m grateful to be able to slowly but surely distance myself, but I’m also aware that many won’t ever have that option or luxury. I have always been conscious of my privilege, almost dying while minding my own business as a 10-year old has a tendency to humble a person. That’s part of what fuels my fire to fight not only my own battles, but for the sake of others in the form of activism.

Common misconceptions are that a person must be able-bodied in order to participate in their own advocacy or that we are permitted only to advocate for a specific cause, such as limiting ourselves to whatever pain condition or treatment we identify with.

But if we expect people to care about what we’re going through, wouldn’t inclusiveness for other causes be a demonstration of mutual respect and support?  That is lacking in the pain community and beyond.  

For example, I’m severely allergic to most medications, specifically the “good stuff” for pain relief. But that hasn’t stopped me from being involved in efforts pertaining to the opioid crisis and healthcare access in general.

I was once invited to speak at a patient protest where I would have otherwise remained silent. Other patients who were there understandably did not want to be judged, ridiculed, exiled or singled out for speaking up about opioid medication, so I stepped up and shared my own story. For that, I was shamed afterwards, due to the fact I am not physically tolerant of pills!

If that ain’t political, I don’t know what is.                

It has been my experience that there’s tremendous difficulty in acknowledging someone else’s perception as being equally real and valuable as one’s own. This leads to a self-defense mechanism, cultivating a sense of validation that can come across as belittling what others have gone through. No one really knows what it is like to live a day in someone else's shoes

I don’t participate in groups fixated on ONE type of ailment. Discomfort of all kinds should be invited and welcomed because hurt does not discriminate and misery can’t be measured. Pain is not a competition. 

I have felt the need to step away from people who are not supportive. Instead of working to strengthen the inner bond that unites us, many would rather convey how much worse they have it than everybody else, instead of listening and learning from others.  

We're in the thick of it as a collective right now. It is necessary for the sake of our lives to inch closer toward a willingness to grow and project hope, especially when it feels like there is none.  That's how we can save ourselves and one another.   

Focusing on what separates us as opposed to how we're able to relate as humans is overly prevalent throughout the pain community and beyond. Suffering is playing out on a global scale and is much bigger than any of us. We’ll never drive true change in healthcare if we dismantle each other instead of the systems we’re fighting against.

Mia Maysack lives with chronic migraine, cluster headache and fibromyalgia. Mia is the founder of Keepin’ Our Heads Up, a Facebook advocacy and support group, and Peace & Love, a wellness and life coaching practice for the chronically ill.

Only 2% of British Columbia Overdoses Linked to Prescription Opioids

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

A new analysis of fatal opioid overdoses in British Columbia found that only about 2% of the deaths were caused by prescription opioids alone. The other overdoses mainly involved illicit fentanyl and other street drugs or a combination of illicit drugs and other medications, which were often not prescribed.

“Our data show a high prevalence of nonprescribed fentanyl and stimulants, and a low prevalence of prescribed opioids detected on toxicology in people who died from illicit drug overdose. These results suggest that strategies to address the current overdose crisis in Canada must do much more than target deprescribing of opioids,” researchers reported in the Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ).

Vancouver, British Columbia was the first major North American city to be hit by a wave of overdoses involving illicit fentanyl, a potent synthetic opioid. A public health emergency was declared in BC in 2016 and strict guidelines were released to limit opioid prescribing. Although prescriptions dropped dramatically, fatal overdoses in BC continued to rise.

Researchers looked at 1,789 fatal overdoses in BC from 2015 to 2017 for which toxicology reports were available and found that 85% of them involved an opioid. Of those, only 2.4% of the deaths were linked to opioid medication alone. Another 7.8% of cases involved a combination of prescribed or non-prescribed opioids.

The findings are similar to a 2019 study of opioid overdoses in Massachusetts, which found that only 1.3% of the people who died had an active prescription for opioid medication.   

“Pain patients and their medications have never been responsible for overdose deaths – not then or now. Will the anti-opiate zealots, with all their data-dredged studies be taken to task for all the unnecessary suffering, disability, and premature deaths they have contributed to within the Canadian pain population?” asked Barry Ulmer, Executive Director of the Chronic Pain Association of Canada, a patient advocacy group.

“The ‘prohibition’ approach that has wrongly been applied for years that focused on reducing access to pharmaceutical products directly contributed to exposure to higher risk illicit substances, which put people at risk of overdose.”

Most Overdoses Linked to Illicit Fentanyl

Researchers say efforts to reduce opioid prescribing in Canada were “insufficient to address the current overdose crisis” because street drugs are involved in the vast majority of deaths. They also warned against the forced tapering of patients on opioid pain medication.

“The risk of harms from these medications must be balanced with the potential harms of nonconsensual discontinuation of opioids for long-term users, including increased pain, risk of suicide and risk of transition to the toxic illicit drug supply,” wrote lead author Alexis Crabtree, MD, resident physician in Public Health at the University of British Columbia.  

Crabtree and her colleagues found that most overdoses involved a street drug, with fentanyl or fentanyl analogues linked to nearly 8 out of 10 overdose deaths. Many of the deaths involved multiple substances, including medications such as stimulants, anti-depressants, benzodiazepines, antipsychotics and gabapentinoids, which were often not prescribed to the victim.   

Over 7% of the overdoses involved methadone or buprenorphine (Suboxone), opioids that are used to treat addiction. About a third of the people who died had a diagnosis of substance use disorder in the year before their overdose.

In a commentary also published in CMAJ, a leading public health expert said it was time to decriminalize drugs and offer a “safe supply” to illicit drug users.

“Unless there is a radical change in our approach to the epidemic, overdose deaths will continue unabated. It is time to scale up safe supply and decriminalize drug use.”

— Dr. Mark Tyndall

“Unless there is a radical change in our approach to the epidemic, overdose deaths will continue unabated. It is time to scale up safe supply and decriminalize drug use,” wrote Mark Tyndall, MD, Executive Director of BC Centre for Disease Control and a professor at the School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia.

Tyndall says blaming the opioid crisis on excess prescribing by doctors and the unethical marketing of opioids by pharmaceutical companies fails to address the reasons people abuse drugs in the first place.

“While having a cheap and ready supply of opioid drugs does allow for misuse and addiction, this narrative fails to acknowledge that drug use is largely demand-driven by people seeking to self-medicate to deal with trauma, physical pain, emotional pain, isolation, mental illness and a range of other personal challenges and these are the people overdosing,” Tyndall wrote.

(Update: Canada’s Chief Public Health Officer, Dr. Theresa Tam, issued a statement August 26 saying the COVID-19 pandemic is contributing to an increase in drug overdoses and deaths across Canada.

“There are indications that the street drug supply is growing more unpredictable and toxic in some parts of the country, as previous supply chains have been disrupted by travel restrictions and border measures. Public health measures designed to reduce the impact of COVID-19 may increase isolation, stress and anxiety as well as put a strain on the supports for persons who use drugs,” Tam said.

“For the third consecutive month this year, the number of drug overdose deaths recorded in British Columbia has exceeded 170. These deaths represent a 136% increase over the number of deaths recorded in July 2019. There are news reports of an increase in overdoses in other communities across the country.” )

Therapy Dogs Give Relief to Fibromyalgia Patients

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

It’s well-known that having a pet or support animal can provide significant psychological benefits to people suffering from stress, anxiety or loneliness. A new study at the Mayo Clinic suggests that pet therapy can also help people with fibromyalgia.

To gain a better understanding of the physiological and emotional benefits of pet therapy, researchers monitored the hormones, heart rate, temperature and pain levels of 221 patients enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Fibromyalgia Treatment Program. Half of the participants spent 20 minutes interacting with a therapy dog and its handler, while the other half served as a control group, spending the same amount of time with the handler only.

The research findings, recently published in Mayo Clinic Proceedings, are striking. People who interacted with a therapy dog had a statistically significant increase in levels of salivary oxytocin – a hormone released by the pituitary gland that is known as the “cuddle hormone” or “love hormone.”

They were also more relaxed, their heart rates decreased, and they reported more positive feelings and fewer negative ones compared to the control group. Over 80% agreed or strongly agreed that animal therapy was helpful to them.  

Pain levels declined in both groups, but there was a larger decrease in those who interacted with the therapy dogs. On average, severe pain scores in that group dropped to more moderate levels.

“Given that individuals with FM (fibromyalgia) suffer pain chronically, this reduction, even if numerically minimal, could help to provide symptomatic relief and quality of life improvement,” researchers concluded. “Overall, the study showed that a 20-minute human-animal interaction (treatment group) as well as a human-human interaction (control group) could improve the emotional and physiological state of patients with FM; however, those who interacted with a therapy dog showed a more robust improvement.”

Fibromyalgia is a poorly understood disorder characterized by widespread body pain, fatigue, poor sleep, anxiety and depression. Its cause is unknown and many treatments prove ineffective. 

Therapy Dogs Calmer

The Mayo Clinic study was unique in another way – because researchers monitored and collected saliva from the dogs to see how they responded to the therapy sessions. Although therapy dogs are used in a wide variety of clinical settings, little is known about the impact of therapy sessions on the emotional state of the dogs.

Researchers say the 19 dogs involved in the fibromyalgia study -- all members of the Mayo Clinic Caring Canines program – did not show signs of stress, appeared to be more relaxed, and had significantly lower heart rates at the end of the sessions, a sign that they enjoyed interacting with patients.

"We need to expand our understanding of how animal-assisted activity impacts therapy dog's well-being, and this sizeable study with 19 dogs of various breeds provided solid evidence that animal-assisted activity done in the right condition does not have negative impacts on well-trained therapy dogs," said François Martin, PhD, a researcher for Purina, which sponsored the study.

"This only encourages us to do more research to continue to demonstrate the power of the human-animal bond on people while ensuring assistance animals also experience positive wellness as a result of their work."

You don’t need a trained therapy dog to enjoy the benefits of having a pet. A recent survey of older adults found that dogs, cats and other pets help their owners enjoy life, reduce stress, keep them physically active, and take their minds off pain.

Developing a Covid-19 Vaccine Requires Patience

By Dr. Lynn Webster, PNN Columnist

There is a worldwide race to find a vaccine for the coronavirus. This is a good thing. We all want a vaccine. Everyone is eager to get back to a "new normal" — whatever that will mean — but it's unlikely to happen until we have an effective and safe COVID-19 vaccine.

The pandemic has already cost us more than 700,000 deaths around the world. The sooner we are able to manufacture and distribute a trustworthy vaccine, the better. The company and country that develop an effective vaccine first will likely be credited with saving hundreds of thousands of lives. The company that wins the race may benefit financially. Prestige and power are also at stake.

Researchers who were already working on vaccines for other coronaviruses, such as SARS and MERS, when the pandemic hit have an advantage. Several companies claim to be on the brink of developing a vaccine. Moderna, Pfizer and AstraZeneca are among the pharmaceutical leaders that have fast-tracked the testing process and claim to be almost ready with a vaccine.

However, rushing a vaccine to market could be dangerous. It typically requires many years to develop a new vaccine because it can take weeks for antibodies to emerge -- and even longer for negative side effects to develop. It may take several months to a year for some adverse effects to emerge, so studies require long-term follow-up to track thousands of vaccinated patients.

Many things can go wrong. The Cutter incident in 1955 was a tragic example of this. America's first polio vaccine caused 400,000 cases of polio, paralyzing 200 children and killing 10. The mass effort to immunize children against polio had to be suspended, and laws were put in place to ensure federal regulation of future vaccines.

There have been other vaccine-related fiascos, too. They should teach us all to be cautious and exercise patience with the development of new inoculations — even one as urgently needed as a COVID-19 vaccine.

Russia’s Vaccine 

On August 11, President Vladimir Putin announced that Russia has developed a COVID-19 vaccine. He even claimed that one of his daughters had been vaccinated. However, reports state the vaccine has not been tested beyond some of Russia's elite and military personnel. Results have not been published, and the vaccine has yet to be certified as either effective or safe. 

Last year, more than 800 scientific publications by Russian scientists had to be withdrawn because they contained plagiarized and fraudulent data. This does not bode well for the veracity of Russia's current claims of a vaccine discovery. 

Developing an effective vaccine will take time. However, we should allow as much time as it requires to ensure the vaccine's safety. We cannot cut corners, or people will be harmed. We also need to trust the source of the reported progress. It makes sense to be cautious about accepting anything Russian scientists or its leadership purport to have accomplished. 

Lynn R. Webster, MD, is a vice president of scientific affairs for PRA Health Sciences and consults with the pharmaceutical industry. He is author of the award-winning book, “The Painful Truth,” and co-producer of the documentary, “It Hurts Until You Die.” You can find Lynn on Twitter: @LynnRWebsterMD

My Name Is Fibromyalgia

By Cathy Kean, Guest Columnist

I am an unwelcome, uninvited, germinating presence that has come to invade your peaceful existence. You will never be the same. I will fill you with misery and take over every aspect of your life. My name is fibromyalgia.

When I am feeling especially mischievous, I will cause you aches and extreme pain. I will rob you of your strength, energy and cognition. You will try to formulate a complete sentence, but only to be able to grasp a few basic words. This is called fibro fog.

I will make it difficult for you to concentrate on anything and your memory will suffer drastically! You will be told constantly by others, “Don’t you remember I told you?” They’ll be thinking you are intentionally trying to get out of something.

I see your frustration and I see your sorrow. Once you were an outgoing, social and engaging individual. Now you are pretty much a recluse. See? I am good at what I do.

You think you can get rid of me by going from doctor to doctor? Silly one, you have been to 8 doctors already and they all discount you by saying, “There is nothing wrong. It’s all in your head.”

Wreaking havoc is what I do best. I will rob you of sleep and much more. I’ll make your body temperature go crazy hot when it’s cold, and cold when it’s hot. You will never feel comfortable again.

I’ll give you digestive issues, anxiety and depression. You will experience lack of control, grief, worry, immune dysfunction, chest pain, panic attacks, inflammation, insomnia and memory loss. Your body will be overly sensitive to pretty much everything, thanks to me!

I will introduce a new sensation into your existence called “noxious stimuli.” It could be a bad smell, bright light, noise, anything. Because your body is now overly sensitive, it will react strongly to just about anything. The lights will be too bright when they’re just fine for everyone else. The same goes for visual chaos, heat, cold and pressure on your skin.

Your nerves will overreact to the things around you and your brain will get overloaded when it gets these signals that intensify your pain.

I will attack you when you least expect it. You will have no way of knowing when, because I am always present, always lurking around! This will hurt your family, your career, your outlook and your sense of self. I will follow you everywhere, never a reprieve!

When I am angry, your days will be hell and your nights sleepless. I’ll be behind you, beside you, everywhere, every day. To the point where you will not remember a time when you lived outside of my grasp.

Imagine feeling like you were burning from the inside out. The stress will be huge and will exacerbate all your other conditions! Your bones will feel like someone is using a jackhammer on them, especially during a change of weather.

Emotionally, I will make it so anything, even something little, will stress and worry you, which will make your body rebel and symptoms flare up just for the fun of it. Your nerves will create phantom itches that will make you scratch yourself raw. The simplest tasks will take you 10 times longer and five times as much energy to finish.

Because I am an invisible illness, others will not be able to see your pain, suffering and degree of sickness. You will hear comments such as:

• “But you don’t look sick.”

• “Must be nice to sit in bed all day.”

• “Your pain can’t be that bad.”

• “If you ate better, you’d feel better.”

You will be called lazy, a liar, faker, fabricator and more.

Because I make you hurt so much, you will need pain relief. The most effective and efficient medication for your symptoms will be prescription opiates. But they have been stigmatized and demonized by doctors, family, government and more. You will be called a drug seeker, an addict, and a druggie. So many hurtful, demeaning labels will be placed upon you which will hurt, damage and wound your soul.

Why? You didn’t ask for this!

It’s because of ignorance! The media has inundated the public by selling them a sensationalized, false and inaccurate narrative about opioids to sell papers and get ratings. Judgmental people who jump to conclusions without researching the true answers.

Shame on them for their cruelty. They make my job so easy, which is to inflict pain, suffering and mayhem.

So here I am, fibromyalgia, your new friend. I am always looking for others to invade and conquer. Unless you’ve walked in the shoes of others who are afflicted, you will never know the depth of their struggles.

Cathy Kean lives in California. She is a grandmother of 7 and mother of 4. Cathy has lived with intractable pain for 14 years from a botched surgery, along with fibromyalgia, arachnoiditis, stiff person syndrome, lupus, Parkinson's disease and insomnia. Cathy is the creator and administrator of the Facebook pages Chronic Illness Awareness and Advocacy Coalition and Pain is Pain.