How to Ask Your Doctor About Medical Marijuana

By Ellen Lenox Smith, Columnist

If you are considering medical marijuana as an alternative treatment for your chronic pain or other medical issues, you might be uncomfortable about approaching your doctor.

There are so many stories circulating about patients being judged by their doctor or being labeled a “drug seeker” if they ask about marijuana, that many have chosen not to engage in a conversation they really wish to have.  

So, what can you do to make this as comfortable as possible?

First, take the time to understand your state’s medical marijuana law. Over half the states have now legalized medical marijuana, but the rules are different for doctors and patients in each state. Click here to see a summary of medical marijuana laws in all 28 states and Washington DC.

Here in Rhode Island, residents can approach any doctor -- not only in Rhode Island -- but in the adjacent states of Connecticut and Massachusetts. If you have no success with the doctors that treat you, then we have a few locations in Rhode Island that you can turn to. These specialty doctors evaluate your medical issues and can sign you on.  

The one negative for using these facilities is that there is a fee that must be paid upfront and you must return yearly to confirm your continued need for medical marijuana. A regular doctor’s appointment only means a co-pay, depending on your insurance.

Second, you want to approach a doctor you believe might be the most open to considering marijuana. How do you figure that out?

Some states require doctors to take a marijuana course before being allowed to sign for someone. Check and see if your doctor is on that list. If they are not, ask your state health department for a list of qualified doctors you can turn to. You can also ask other patients already in the program what success they had with your doctor or see if they know another doctor in the area who would be better. 

If you think your doctor might be open to this discussion, consider calling their office in advance and sound out where the doctor stands on marijuana before going in. If it sounds hopeless, then turn to a different doctor that treats you.

If your state has set up distribution centers or marijuana dispensaries, they may also be able to guide you to a doctor willing to sign you on, if you have no luck with your own personal doctors.

Third, when you finally approach the doctor, come to the appointment with some knowledge to share. Be ready to educate them. Google your health condition and medical marijuana to see if cannabis has been used to treat it. Feel free to use our website to download articles about the successful use of marijuana with your condition.

Dr. Stephen Corn has a wonderful website for doctors called “The Answer Page” where they can turn to for education on this topic and also submit questions they might have. I would encourage you to share the link with your doctor.

Be sure to share with your doctor what medications you have already tried to help cope with your condition. Explain why they have not worked for you. Remind them that they are not writing a script or prescription for marijuana, but simply confirming you have one of your state’s qualifying conditions for it.

Share with the doctor that you don’t expect them to guide you in how to administer marijuana, and that you will be educated at the dispensary or by a caregiver.

I know it feels intimidating to consider asking your doctor to support you, but if this is a possible solution for your life, take the time to prepare for the meeting and go for it.

There are risks involved with using marijuana without telling your doctor. They could be caught by surprise and discharge you if marijuana unexpectedly shows up in a drug test. That’s happened to some patients, even though the CDC specifically warns that “clinicians should not dismiss patients from care based on a urine drug test result because this could constitute patient abandonment and could have adverse consequences for patient safety.”

I have turned my life around with a simple teaspoon of a marijuana-based oil at night -- and had to be convinced by my own doctor to give it a try! Once I realized what this was doing for my quality of life, I had to share my success with others.  I hope that others may find this natural and safe option to be successful for them too.   

Ellen Lenox Smith suffers from Ehlers Danlos syndrome and sarcoidosis. Ellen and her husband Stuart live in Rhode Island. They are co-directors for medical marijuana advocacy for the U.S. Pain Foundation and serve as board members for the Rhode Island Patient Advocacy Coalition.

For more information about medical marijuana, visit their website.

The information in this column should not be considered as professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. It is for informational purposes only and represents the author’s opinions alone. It does not inherently express or reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Pain News Network.

Can Gum Disease Cause Rheumatoid Arthritis?

By Pat Anson, Editor

Scientists have long suspected that pathogens and bacterial infections may play a role in the development of autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Now there is evidence that a bacterium associated with chronic gum infections may trigger an inflammatory response characteristic of RA, a discovery that could lead to new ways to treat and prevent the disease.

"This research may be the closest we've come to uncovering the root cause of RA," said Maximilian Konig, MD, a former Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine fellow now at Massachusetts General Hospital.

Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic autoimmune disease in which the body’s own defenses attack joint tissues, causing pain, inflammation and bone erosion. About 1.5 million Americans and one percent of adults worldwide suffer from RA. There is no cure for the disease and treatments only focus on slowing its progression.

In a study of nearly 200 RA patients, Konig and his colleagues found that nearly half had antibodies against Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans in their blood.  

The level of infection with the bacteria was similar in patients with periodontal (gum) disease, but quite different in healthy patients, only 11 percent of whom tested positive for A. actinomycetemcomitans.

An infection with A. actinomycetemcomitans appears to induce the production of citrullinated proteins, which are suspected of activating the immune system and driving the cascade of events leading to RA.

"This is like putting together the last few pieces of a complicated jigsaw puzzle that has been worked on for many years," says Felipe Andrade, MD, a senior study investigator and associate professor of Medicine at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

Andrade cautions that over half of the study participants with RA had no evidence of an infection with A. actinomycetemcomitans, which may indicate that other bacteria in the gut, lung or elsewhere could be involved. He says more research is needed to determine if there is a cause and effect relationship between bacteria and RA.

"If we know more about the evolution of both combined, perhaps we could prevent rather than just intervene," he said.

The Johns Hopkins study is published in the journal Science Translational Medicine.

Scientists have observed an association between periodontal disease and RA since the early 1900s, and have suspected that both diseases may be triggered by a common factor. In the last decade, studies have focused on a bacterium known as Porphyromonas gingivalis, which is found in patients with gum disease. However, research has so far failed to corroborate such a link.

Researchers in the current study found inflammation in the joints of RA patients that was similar to the inflamed gums of patients with periodontal disease, an inflammatory process known as hyper-citrullination.

Citrullination occurs naturally in everyone as a way to regulate the function of proteins. But in people with RA, the process becomes hyperactive, resulting in the abnormal accumulation of citrullinated proteins. This drives the production of antibodies against proteins that create inflammation and attack a person's own tissues, the hallmark of RA.

Few Differences in Fibromyalgia Between Men & Women

By Lana Barhum

Fibromyalgia is remarkably more common in women than it is in men, but when it comes to feeling its effects, there is little difference between the sexes, according to results of a new study published in the journal Pain Research and Management.

Fibromyalgia is a poorly understood disorder characterized by deep tissue pain, fatigue, depression and insomnia. As many as 90 percent of fibromyalgia cases are diagnosed in women.

The Al-Andalus Project consisted of 405 fibromyalgia patients and 247 non-fibromyalgia participants from southern Spain, the vast majority of them women. A significant limitation of the study is that only 73 men participated.

The researchers followed the groups for two years to see if gender-specific symptoms in the fibromyalgia patients existed. Participants were evaluated in several ways, including pain, lifestyle impact, fatigue, sleep issues, mental and emotional health, and cognitive performance.

In the fibromyalgia group, the men showed better working memory than women, whereas sleep latency (the length of time that it takes to go from full wakefulness to the lightest non-REM sleep state) was lower in the female participants. In the non-fibromyalgia group, the male participants showed higher pain thresholds in some areas, but not in others. 

The researchers found that some symptoms, including pain, in fibromyalgia men were worse than their non-fibromyalgia male peers. They believe the findings show that fibromyalgia might affect men more severely than women in tender point tenderness, mental health, and sleep latency, which contradicts earlier research on gender differences.

“Previous research has shown that fibromyalgia men present more severe limitations in physical functioning, social functioning, and health perception. However, we failed to find these differences between fibromyalgia women and men in the present study. Our results are consistent with other studies finding no gender differences in clinical key features in fibromyalgia," they wrote. 

It does still seem that the worst fibromyalgia symptoms, especially pain, affect females more severely than they do males, but the Al-Andalus researchers do not feel that is unique to fibromyalgia. 

"In the general population, women usually present greater pain sensitivity and lower pain threshold than men, which is in agreement with the results found in the nonfibromyalgia group of the present study," they wrote, noting that there is a difference in the way genders perceive and handle pain.

"It has been speculated that both peripheral and central nervous systems pathways might be involved in pain experiences; however, the mechanism underlying gender differences in pain remains misunderstood."

While the findings of the Al-Andalus Project do not support any significant gender differences in fibromyalgia and only offer some indication that fibromyalgia might affect men more severely with some symptoms, the researchers believe there’s a need to further understand why men and women perceive fibromyalgia pain and symptoms differently.

"Our results, then, suggest that fibromyalgia pain might be aggravated in men and, consequently, there might be gender-specific pain mechanisms in fibromyalgia," they said.

The Al-Andalus researchers believe further studies are needed that look at male and female fibromyalgia patients separately

“Given the low sample size of our sample, our findings should be interpreted as preliminary and future studies with a larger sample size of men might confirm or contrast the cut-off scores suggested in the present study," they wrote.

Lana Barhum lives and works in northeast Ohio. She is a freelance medical writer, patient advocate, legal assistant, and mother. Having lived with rheumatoid arthritis and fibromyalgia since 2008, Lana uses her experiences to share expert advice on living successfully with chronic illness. She has written for several online health communities, including Alliance Health, Upwell, Mango Health, and The Mighty.

 To learn more about Lana, visit her website.

An Open Letter to President-Elect Trump

By Percy Menzies, Guest Columnist

Dear President-Elect Trump,

You will soon have an extraordinary opportunity to save thousands of lives with one stroke of the pen! I am talking about reducing overdose deaths from opioid overdoses. How is this possible?

We have three highly effective medications for the treatment of opioid addiction, but they are grossly under-utilized, largely due to accessibility. Two of the three drugs used to treat opioid use disorder have restrictions that have no place when overdose deaths exceed 30,000 per year. These restrictions made sense at a different time, but these barriers are now inadvertently contributing to overdose deaths.

I am specifically talking about buprenorphine, the most widely used medication in the battle against the opioid epidemic. This medication, better known by its brand name Suboxone, is an opioid with a very safe profile. Its unique pharmacology makes it almost impossible to overdose.

There are barriers to the use of this medication which made sense 14 years ago, when heroin was not a public health issue, but today they are a hindrance to saving lives.

Buprenorphine is the only drug that requires physicians to complete eight hours of training and then apply to the Drug Enforcement Administration to obtain a special exemption to prescribe it. It gets worse. Physicians can only treat 30 patients with this medication in the first year, and then they must obtain permission from the DEA to increase the limit to 100 patients. The physician also has to keep clear records and can expect a visit from a DEA agent to look at the records. 

This is a major deterrent and way too few physicians have bothered to obtain the required exemption. Any physician who has a DEA license can prescribe an FDA-approved controlled substance without restriction, but they have to deal with this barrier to prescribe buprenorphine. 

These restrictions were put in place to prevent buprenorphine from joining the opioid “pill mills” when few anticipated heroin sweeping our cities and towns. At the present time, there is no strategy in place to cut off or curtail the supply of heroin, or heroin that is laced with super potent opioids like fentanyl. Deaths from prescription opioids are declining, while deaths from heroin and fentanyl are climbing. Indeed, prescriptions for opioids drugs have fallen between 12 -25%, but the overdoses deaths have not declined. 

Yes, buprenorphine is being diverted, but most experts believe that is due to the lack of treatment. Patients desperately seeking treatment are purchasing the drug on the streets. Many experts believe that if patients have expanded and easier access to buprenorphine, the diversion will drastically reduce and more patients will be in treatment and get away from heroin.

Several steps have been taken to address this catastrophic problem, but these steps are woefully inadequate. Expansion of the needle-exchange programs and the widespread distribution of the opioid overdose drug naloxone (better known by the brand name Narcan) are welcome and should be expanded, but they are at best palliative in nature. These measures do little to address the underlying addiction.

The federal government is increasing the patient limits for buprenorphine for selected specialists from 100 to 275, and will also allow nurse practitioners and physician assistants to complete the required training and obtain the DEA exemption to prescribe buprenorphine. These are welcome steps, but fall far short of the response required to expand treatment and reduce deaths. 

You got elected on a law-and-order platform and a promise to reduce the flow of heroin coming in from Mexico. Almost 50 years ago, Richard Nixon got elected on a similar platform.  He too faced an unprecedented public health epidemic of heroin addiction – one that is nowhere close to what we are facing today.  

President Nixon is remembered for taking a bold measure, which at that time was controversial. He initiated the opening of methadone clinics, which for the first time provided evidence-based treatment for heroin addicts. This measure reduced overdose deaths, protected society from criminal activity, and allowed these patients to become productive members of society.  For the first time in the dark and checkered history of our nation, addiction was treated as a chronic healthcare issue and not a criminal activity. 

Nixon went a step further to curb the supply of heroin coming into this country. He put political pressure on France to shut down the illegal labs processing Turkish-grown opium into heroin. Turkey also complied with the strong U.S. demand to curb the illegal cultivation of opium. Who can forget The French Connection, the thriller movie about this operation.

Mr. Trump, you have an extraordinary opportunity to lift the present restrictions on buprenorphine through executive order, to lure patients away from heroin and drastically reduce overdose deaths. Your action would provide increased treatment and not just palliative care.

Furthermore, you are in the best position to bring pressure on Mexico to eliminate the opium processing labs and drastically reduce heroin coming into this country.  An epidemic is best treated when effective treatment is combined with eliminating factors contributing to the spread of the epidemic. In this case, it is the supply of heroin.

This one single action will earn you the gratitude of tens of thousands of families terrified at hearing a knock on the door informing them of the death of a loved one. You will also earn the gratitude of millions of patients suffering from chronic pain, who have been needlessly cut off from prescription opioids because of the overreaction of regulators and many physicians.

You will be remembered in history for a bold action that saved a generation from succumbing to a man-made epidemic.

Percy Menzies, M. Pharm, is the president of the Assisted Recovery Centers of America, a treatment center based in St Louis, Missouri.

He can be reached at: percymenzies@arcamidwest.com

The information in this column should not be considered as professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. It is for informational purposes only and represents the author’s opinions alone. It does not inherently express or reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Pain News Network.

Opioid Overdose Statistics: As Clear as Mud

By Pat Anson, Editor

We’ve written before about how confusing and muddied the statistics can be for overdose deaths from opioid pain medication. (see “Lies, Damned Lies, and Overdose Statistics”). Now the White House and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are adding to the confusion.

Last week a news release from the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy stated that 17,536 Americans died in 2015 from overdoses involving prescription opioids, a 4% increase from the year before.

This week the CDC reported in its Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report that the number of overdoses involving painkillers was actually smaller.

“Natural opioids (including morphine and codeine) and semi-synthetic opioids (including commonly prescribed pain medications such as oxycodone and hydrocodone) were involved in more than 12,700 deaths in 2015,” a CDC news release said. The agency said that was a 2.6% increase from the year before.

We asked the CDC to explain the discrepancy and were given a third number

“Given the recent surge in illegally-made fentanyl, the CDC Injury Center is analyzing synthetic opioids (other than methadone) separately from other prescription opioids (natural, semi-synthetic, and methadone). Using this approach, the number of deaths involving prescription opioids was… 15,281 in 2015,” CDC spokesperson Courtney Leland said in an email.

“This number better reflects the deaths associated with prescription opioids given the changing nature of the epidemic and increasing surge of illicit opioids.”

And what about the White House estimate?

“Their analysis of 17,536 deaths in 2015 was calculated by including any death that involved: opium; natural and semi-synthetic opioids; methadone; and unspecified narcotics (opioids). You would need to check with them about their rationale/methodology,” Leland explained.

In other words, the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy knowingly counted a number of overdoses caused by illicit opioids as prescription drug deaths.

All of these numbers may make your eyes glaze over, but they demonstrate an important point about the nation’s so-called opioid epidemic: No one really knows how bad it is.  Which is startling, because it’s an important national issue and Congress just voted to spend another $1 billion to fight it.

They may want to get their numbers straight first.

One thing the White House and the CDC do agree on is that overdoses from illegal opioids such as heroin and fentanyl are soaring, and deaths involving opioid pain medication appear to be leveling off.

The CDC reported many troubling statistics about opioid overdoses, which claimed over 33,000 lives last year:  

  • Death rates nationwide from synthetic opioids such as fentanyl increased by over 72%
  • Death rates from synthetic opioids more than doubled in New York (136%), Connecticut (126%) and Illinois (120%).
  • Heroin death rates nationwide increased by nearly 21%
  • Deaths rates from heroin jumped even more in South Carolina (57%), North Carolina (46%), and Tennessee (44%).

Perhaps the only bright spot was that deaths associated with methadone dropped by 9 percent, which the CDC attributed to lower methadone doses and less prescribing.

The agency still believes there is an “ongoing problem with prescription opioids” and that the number of overdoses may be undercounted.  

“Regardless of the analysis strategy used, prescription opioids continue to be involved in more overdose deaths than any other drug, and all the numbers are likely to underestimate the true burden given the large proportion of overdose deaths where the type of drug is not listed on the death certificate,” the CDC explains in a separate report.

Questionable Data

The CDC continues to rely on death certificate codes for much of its data, which many experts find troubling because the codes do not reflect the cause of death --- only the conditions that exist at the time of death.  In other words, somebody could die from lung cancer, but if a doctor used morphine to help ease the dying patient’s cancer pain, a box could be checked on their death certificate indicating opioids were present at the time of death. The CDC would consider that an “opioid involved” death.

Other factors that raise questions about the reliability of the CDC’s data:

  • Overdose deaths were based on data from only 28 states “with high quality reporting”
  • Wide variability in the expertise and training of local medical examiners and coroners who complete death certificates
  • Nearly 1 out of 5 death certificates nationwide do not include any drug data
  • Some heroin deaths may have been misclassified as prescription drug deaths
  • Some overdose deaths may have been counted twice.

Critics also say there is a disturbing tendency by the CDC to “cherry pick” data to dramatize the harm caused by prescription opioids, without ever discussing their benefits. For example, the agency referred to a recent report from the DEA this way:

“The Drug Enforcement Administration referred to prescription drugs, heroin, and fentanyl as the most significant drug-related threats to the United States. The misuse of prescription opioids is intertwined with that of illicit opioids; data have demonstrated that nonmedical use of prescription opioids is a significant risk factor for heroin use, underscoring the need for continued prevention efforts around prescription opioids.”

The CDC does not mention that the DEA also found that the prescribing and abuse of opioid pain medication is actually in decline, that the number of admissions to treatment centers for painkiller addiction is falling, and that less than 1% of prescription opioids are diverted. Nor does the CDC mention that the DEA found a “massive surge” in the production of counterfeit pain medication made with illicit fentanyl, which is probably killing quite a few patients seeking pain relief.  

The CDC cites its own research to make the claim that it “did not find evidence that efforts to reduce opioid prescribing were leading to heroin overdoses.” But the DEA report said just the opposite: Some prescription opioid users are switching to heroin when they are no longer able to obtain medication:

“Some abusers, when unable to obtain or afford CPDs (controlled prescription drugs), begin using heroin, a cheaper alternative that offers similar physiological effects. With the successful reduction in availability of controlled prescription drugs, more users may shift to abusing heroin.”

This isn’t the first time the CDC has been accused of cherry picking data for public consumption. The same complaint arose when the agency released its opioid prescribing guidelines, many of which relied on “weak” or “very weak” evidence to support the contention that opioids should not be prescribed for chronic pain.

Recent research published in the journal Pain Medicine also took the agency to task for dismissing evidence that opioids could be used safely long term, while making no mention of the significant risks posed by non-opioid pain medication.

No common nonopioid treatment for chronic pain has been studied in aggregate over longer intervals of active treatment than opioids. To dismiss trials as ‘inadequate’ if their observation period is a year or less is inconsistent with current regulatory standards,” wrote lead author Daniel Carr, MD, President of the American Academy of Pain Medicine and Program Director of Pain, Research, Education & Policy at Tufts University School of Medicine.  

“Basing therapeutic decision-making upon durations of published clinical efficacy or effectiveness trials does not support choosing any drug or nondrug therapy over another. In fact, the opening words of the first recommendation of the CDC… make no mention of the overwhelmingly strong evidence for significant morbidity and mortality risk from the most likely nonopioid alternatives to opioid therapy for chronic pain: NSAIDs, coxibs (cox-2 inhibitors), and acetaminophen.”

Although the CDC guidelines are “voluntary” and only intended for primary care physicians, many patients have reported that their chronic pain is going untreated or under-treated because they are no longer able to obtain opioids or their doses have been drastically lowered by their physicians. Other patients have been abruptly “fired” by doctors who no longer want to treat chronic pain because they fear prosecution for overprescribing opioids. Still other patients are contemplating or have committed suicide.

Where are the statistics about that?

FDA Designates CRPS Drug as ‘Breakthrough Therapy’

By Pat Anson, Editor

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has designated an experimental drug as a potential breakthrough therapy for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), a chronic and disabling neurological disease for which there is no cure or treatment.

Neridronic acid was discovered by Abiogen Pharma, an Italian drug maker, and is jointly being developed with Grünenthal, a German pharmaceutical company.

The Breakthrough Therapy designation by the FDA came after the companies reported the results of a Phase II clinical trial showing a significant reduction in pain and symptoms of CRPS with neridronic acid treatment. The drug has already received fast track and orphan drug designations from the FDA.

The agency considers a new drug as a breakthrough therapy if it is intended to treat a serious condition and if preliminary clinical evidence demonstrates substantial improvement over current treatments. There are no current FDA approved treatments for CRPS, which is also known as Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD).

"It is very encouraging to see that the FDA recognizes the urgent need for new treatments for patients with CRPS and has granted neridronic acid the status of a Breakthrough Therapy. This supports our efforts to develop an efficacious treatment option to these patients,” said Klaus-Dieter Langner, MD, Chief Scientific Officer of Grünenthal. “We are committed to working closely with the FDA to bring neridronic acid to patients with CRPS as fast as possible.”

In the Phase II study, neridronic acid or a placebo was administered intravenously to 464 patients with CRPS type 1, when the disease is in its early stages. The study ended in November.  

A previous study of 82 CRPS patients in Italy found that those who were treated with infusions of neridronic acid experienced significant and persistent reductions in pain.

Neridronic acid is currently being evaluated in a Phase III clinical trial. If successful, the drug could be the first FDA-approved treatment for CRPS, which is characterized by severe, burning pain that usually begins in the arms or legs after an injury or surgery. The pain often spreads throughout the body.

"Grünenthal is highly dedicated to improving the lives of patients with pain as well as rare diseases with limited treatment options. This is an area of high unmet medical need,” Gabriel Baertschi, CEO of the Grünenthal.

The company recently purchased Thar Pharmaceuticals, which is developing an oral form of zoledronic acid for the treatment of CRPS. That drug is also undergoing a Phase III study.

Neridronic acid is an investigational aminobisphosphonate. According to the Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy Syndrome Association (RSDSA), bisphosphonates have been used for years overseas to treat CRPS.

“We need options and if this can help patients and encourage other medications and treatment options to come onto the market for CRPS’ers, it’s a great thing,” said Barby Ingle, who suffers from CRPS/RSD and is President of the International Pain Foundation.

“We saw with fibromyalgia and Lyrica that once it (fibromyalgia) had a medication designated it gained more awareness and acceptance in society, leading to better access to care. The same could happen with a CRPS designation for a medication, leading to greater treatments and a cure in the future.”

Can You Color Away Pain?

By Pat Anson, Editor

You might call Mary Hayes a pioneer in adult coloring. Millions of people like her have discovered that coloring a complex floral or geometric design is a great stress reliever.

But Hayes also colors to relieve her pain.

“I can't do a lot of activities, so I wanted something to do that would keep my mind active,” says Hayes, who has suffered most of her life from fibromyalgia, migraines, fatigue and other chronic illnesses.

“I played video games and worked puzzles, but I got tired of that.  I realized I was losing part of my physical self when my mind was engaged. So I started coloring.”

Hayes says she got strange looks when she first started asking for adult coloring books in book stores. That was before the “coloring craze” took off – first in Europe and then the United States.

Today, many craft, hobby and book stores keep a wide selection of adult coloring books. One colorist has sold more than 20 million of her books worldwide.

“I think of coloring as my therapy.  I've been able to express the way my pain makes me feel inside in a way that I cannot express in words,” says Hayes. “It not only engages the mind, it engages the body by adding some movement that could be compared to a yoga-like experience.

“When I'm sitting there and coloring, I'm thinking about what colors I want to use and what medium I want to use.  Time moves past so quickly.  I look up at the time and realize I haven't taken a pain pill in hours and that is an amazing feeling.  I think in a way it ties the brain up so tightly, it stops all those pain signals from breaking through.” 

Coloring not only provides pain relief, it’s turned Hayes into artist. Beautiful and complex designs – like the one she colored below – can often take days to complete.

Hayes started connecting with other colorists on Facebook, which is where Jack Plaxe discovered her. Plaxe retired from the world of finance several years ago, formed a company called Color 4 Fun, and started publishing adult coloring books as an avocation.  

“I’m having a good time working with artists around the world creating these books,” Plaxe told PNN. “I don’t have pain, but I color and it’s very, very relaxing. It’s stress relieving.”

Plaxe noticed that many of the colorists he met online suffer from chronic pain, which gave him the idea of publishing his latest book, Color Away the Pain. It features the artistry and personal stories of Hayes and four other colorists who suffer from chronic pain and illness.

“Many of them use coloring as a form of therapy for distraction from their pain. So I’m well aware of the benefit of coloring for people who are pain sufferers,” says Plaxe.

“We color our soul onto those pages.  We can run and be active in colors.  We can express our spirit and self with our personal style.  We are defined by our coloring style and not our disability,” says Hayes. 

“It feels so good to have someone tell someone about my artistry and not my disability.  I can show my work and not have to talk about my latest treatment.  Those things don't disappear, but they are not what defines me anymore.  I found out I have a real talent that I never knew existed.”

To see more of that talent and those of other artists, click here, here or here.

To find the hidden artist in yourself, you can buy a copy of Color Away the Pain from Amazon for $7.95. All royalties from sales of the book will go to the Chronic Pain Research Alliance.

Plaxe also has a Facebook page that offers free advice and instructional videos for beginners.

Color Away the Pain is featured along with several other pain-related books in PNN’s new “Suggested Reading” section.

Pain Relievers Linked to Hearing Loss in Women

By Pat Anson, Editor

Long-term use of acetaminophen and ibuprofen raises the risk of hearing loss in older women, according to a new study published in the American Journal of Epidemiology.

Researchers at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston analyzed data from over 55,000 women between the ages of 48 and 73 enrolled in the Nurses’ Health Study, a long-term study that began in 1976.

They found that about 1 in 6 women who used ibuprofen or acetaminophen for at least six years suffered some degree of hearing loss. No such link was found in the women who used regular doses of aspirin.

“Although the magnitude of higher risk of hearing loss with analgesic use was modest, given how commonly these medications are used, even a small increase in risk could have important health implications,” said senior author Gary Curhan, MD, a physician in the Channing Division of Network Medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital.

“Assuming causality, this would mean that approximately 16.2 percent of hearing loss occurring in these women could be due to ibuprofen or acetaminophen use.”

Curhan noted the study was limited to mostly older, white women participating in the Nurses’ Health Study and that further investigation with larger and more diverse populations would be needed to better understand the connection between hearing loss and pain reliever use.

The researchers have previously published findings that indicate high frequency use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) and acetaminophen is associated with hearing loss in men and younger women. High doses of aspirin have also been associated with hearing loss.

The new study did not look at why the medications affect hearing, but previous research suggests the pain relievers affect blood and oxygen flow to sensitive parts of the ear that may compromise hearing.

About two- thirds of women in the U.S. over the age of 60 report some degree of hearing loss.

“Hearing loss is extremely common in the United States and can have a profound impact on quality of life,” said Curhan. “Finding modifiable risk factors could help us identify ways to lower risk before hearing loss begins and slow progression in those with hearing loss.”

Many people wrongly believe that over-the-counter pain relievers are relatively safe because they are available without a prescription. But studies have linked NSAIDs and acetaminophen to cardiovascular disease, hypertension, kidney problems and liver failure.

“I worry that people think NSAIDs and acetaminophen are completely safe, and that they don’t need to think about their potential (side effects),” Curhan told Time.  “But particularly for people who are taking them for chronic pain, I try to encourage them to look at why they are having the pain, not what they can take to try to treat the pain.”

Veterans More Likely to Have Chronic Pain

By Pat Anson, Editor

Nearly one out of ten U.S. military veterans suffers from chronic severe pain, according to an extensive new survey that found the prevalence of pain higher in veterans than nonveterans, particularly in veterans who served during recent armed conflicts.

The survey by the National Institutes of Health provides the first national estimate of severe pain in both veterans and nonveterans.

The prevalence of severe pain – defined as pain that occurs "most days" or "every day" and bothers the individual "a lot" – was 9.1% for veterans and 6.4% for nonveterans.

“Our analysis showed that veterans were about 40 percent more likely to experience severe pain than nonveterans,” said Richard Nahin, PhD, lead author of the analysis.

“Younger veterans were substantially more likely to report suffering from severe pain than nonveterans, even after controlling for underlying demographic characteristics. These findings suggest that more attention should be paid to helping veterans manage the impact of severe pain and related disability on daily activities.”

The study is based on data from a survey of over 67,000 adults (6,647 veterans and 61,049 nonveterans) who responded to questions about the persistence and intensity of their pain. The vast majority of veterans were men (92%), while most of the nonveterans were women (56%). The survey did not identify any specific aspects of military service, including branch of the armed forces, years of service, or whether the veteran served in a combat role.

More veterans (65%) than nonveterans (56%) reported having some type of pain in the previous three months.  They were also more likely to have severe pain from back pain, joint pain, migraine, neck pain, sciatica and jaw pain.

Younger veterans (8%) were substantially more likely to suffer from severe pain than nonveterans (3%) of similar ages.

“These findings show that we still have much more to do to help our veterans who are suffering from pain,” said Josephine Briggs, MD, director of the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH). “This new knowledge can help inform effective health care strategies for veterans of all ages. More research is needed to generate additional evidence-based options for veterans managing pain.”

Veterans Complain About VA Pain Care

The survey adds to the growing body of evidence that military veterans are more likely to suffer from physical and mental health issues, and that their problems are not being adequately addressed by the Veterans Administration, which provides health services to 6 million veterans and their families. According to a recent VA study, an average of 22 veterans commit suicide each day.

One of them was Peter Kaisen. In August, the 76-year old Navy veteran committed suicide outside a VA Medical Center in Northport, New York.  Kaisen’s widow told Newsday that her husband had chronic back pain, but VA doctors had told him there was nothing more they could do to ease his suffering.

According to a 2014 Inspector General’s study, more than half of the veterans being treated at the VA have chronic pain, as well as other conditions that contribute to it, such as depression and post-traumatic stress disorder.

In recent months, dozens of veterans have complained to Pain News Network that their treatment grew worse after the VA adopted the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s opioid prescribing guidelines, which discourage doctors from prescribing opioids for chronic pain.

“I am a Vietnam era veteran who has had testicular cancer, prostate cancer, hip joint cancer, and have been living with an inoperable spinal cord tumor,” wrote Tommy Garrett. “I cannot get the VA to prescribe OxyContin that civilian doctors have had me on for 17 years.”

“I received epidurals for 10 years and also I received pain medication for 6 years. The VA quit giving me epidurals and also took me off Vicodin,” said Mitch Kepner. “(Before) I was active and now I just lay around and do nothing wishing I was dead. I have no life, everything I do is a struggle. I don't want pity. I don't want compassion. I don't want (anything) from anybody. I just want Vicodin back so I can function.”

After several years of taking morphine to relieve pain from chronic arthritis, Vietnam veteran Ron Pence had his dosage cut in half by VA doctors – who want him to take Cymbalta, a non-opioid originally developed to treat anxiety. After reading about Cymbalta's side effects, Pence refused to take it.

“Why start something like that when what I was taking had no side effects for me and was working fine? I am sure the pills they are pushing will end in a lot more deaths and terrible disabilities and suffering,” wrote Pence in a PNN guest column.

“We are in one of the most advanced countries in the world medically, yet the doctors and politicians will not use that knowledge to ease pain and suffering. We have to find a solution.”

Quell Relieves Back Pain Without Medication

By Pat Anson, Editor

Like many people who suffer from chronic back pain, Greg Watson has tried a lot of different treatments, including physical therapy, soft tissue manipulation, chiropractic adjustments, trigger point injections and dry needling.

“I did trigger point injections with really big needles,” says Watson, whose back was broken in four places when his bike was hit by a car in 2011. “A lot of interesting ways of relieving pain by triggering an even bigger pain. Some of those things would work temporarily.”

Watson spent five days in the hospital after the accident, where he was “pumped full of morphine.” When he was finally released and sent home, the 45-year old Watson was determined to avoid taking more pain medication. That meant trying all of those alternative therapies, with little success, and living for years with intermittent pain that sometimes reached a 6 or 7 on the pain scale.

A friend recommended that Watson try Quell, a battery powered medical device worn below the knee that uses electric nerve stimulation to relieve pain throughout the body -- a therapy known as neuromodulation.

“I felt it and noticed something right away,” says Watson. “It feels a little bit like pins and needles, and it kind of comes in little waves or pulses. Very low amounts of electricity coming into you.”

It took a couple of days for Watson to feel some pain relief. The biggest improvement he noticed was that he slept better.  

“I would go home and put it on for a few hours and then be able to get a full night’s sleep without having to wake up with leg discomfort in the middle of the night,” said Watson, a city planner in Boston who is an avid runner and bicyclist.

neurometrix image

On bad pain days, Watson will wear the Quell device while sleeping or at work. But mostly he just wears it for a few hours at a time. Watson has found that he’s often able the get through an entire day without even thinking about his pain. 

“There are some days I get a bigger uptick in the amount of pain that comes from that old injury site. But when that’s the case, I just up-ramp the use of it a little more.”

Quell is made by NeuroMetrix (NASDAQ: NURO), which recently won approval for the device to be sold in the Europe Union.

It’s been available in the U.S. since the summer of 2015 and is FDA approved for the treatment of chronic pain.

Quell can be purchased without a prescription, but is not covered by insurance and costs $249 through the company’s website or on Amazon. 

PNN columnist Jennifer Kain Kilgore says Quell “worked brilliantly” in relieving her chronic neck and back pain.

But readers have had mixed results with the device.

“Very expensive, wasn't covered under my Medicare insurance. I tried it for a couple of weeks and simply didn't receive ANY pain relief for my low back and neck. None. I am very disappointed,” wrote one woman.

“I have been using Quell for a month now. I use it mainly at night for the pain that I experience in my hips and legs that keeps me from sleeping,” wrote Pam. “It actually has helped me to ditch the sleeping pills. It helps me fall asleep. I am elated.”

“I am on day 18 of my Quell device. It has eliminated the pain in my knees. No more Bengay, Australian Dream or Blue Emu Cream needed. The pain in my feet and hips has diminished greatly,” said Beth Flood. “It is not perfect, it is not a complete answer, but for what it does and the relief it has offered, it is well worth buying.”

NeuroMetrix recently announced that it was conducting a small clinical study of Quell in 60 adults with chronic low back pain at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital Pain Management Center. The three month study will compare a group of patients using Quell to patients using their “treatment-as-usual.” Participants in both groups will use a smartphone app developed by the Pain Management Center to help them document and manage their pain.

“This study will analyze the potential for Quell to reduce pain and improve quality of life in people suffering from chronic low back pain. We look forward to learning a great deal from this study,” said Shai Gozani, MD, President and CEO of NeuroMetrix in a news release.

In previous small studies of Quell in patients with arthritis, diabetic neuropathy, sciatica or fibromyalgia, over 80 percent said the device relieved their chronic pain and improved their overall health. The largest measured changes were in pain relief, along with improved sleep, general activity and walking ability.

Over two-thirds of the patients said Quell also reduced the amount of pain medication they were taking. That’s an important consideration for Greg Watson.

“Especially if you’re looking to avoid medication. That’s the absolutely most appealing thing about it to me,” he says.

Misuse of Pain Meds by Teens Continues Decline

By Pat Anson, Editor

Two new studies this week paint a somewhat conflicting picture about the abuse of opioids by teens and pregnant women.

A survey of over 45,000 teens by the University of Michigan and the National Institutes of Health found that teenage drug abuse continues to decline, with a significant drop in the misuse of the painkiller Vicodin. A second study at the university found the number of babies born with opioid withdrawal symptoms has grown substantially, especially in rural areas.

The annual Monitoring the Future survey found that 4.8% of high school seniors had misused an opioid pain reliever in the past year, down from a peak of 9.5% in 2004. In the past five years alone, misuse of opioid pain medication by 12th graders has declined by 45 percent.

Only 2.9% of high school seniors reported the misuse of Vicodin in 2016, compared to nearly 10 percent a decade ago. Vicodin and other hydrocodone products were reclassified as Schedule II controlled substances in 2015, making them harder to obtain.

"Clearly our public health prevention efforts, as well as policy changes to reduce availability, are working to reduce teen drug use,”  said Nora Volkow, MD, director of National Institute of Drug Abuse.

The survey found a continued long-term decline in teenage use of many illicit substances, as well as alcohol and tobacco. The use of any illicit drug was the lowest in the survey’s history for eighth graders. One negative sign was an increase in the misuse of over-the-counter cough medicine by eighth graders.

Marijuana use in the past month by eighth graders fell to 5.4%, down from 6.5% in 2015. However, among high school seniors, nearly one in four reported marijuana use in the past month. There also continues to be a higher rate of marijuana use in the past year (38%) among 12th graders in states with medical marijuana laws.

"It is encouraging to see more young people making healthy choices not to use illicit substances," said National Drug Control Policy Director Michael Botticelli. "We must continue to do all we can to support young people through evidence-based prevention efforts as well as treatment for those who may develop substance use disorders.”

The majority of teens continue to say they get most of their opioid pain relievers from friends or relatives, either stolen, bought or given. The only prescription drugs seen as easier to get in 2016 than last year are tranquilizers, with 11.4 percent of eighth graders reporting they would be “fairly easy” or “very easy” to get.

More Babies Suffering from Opioid Withdrawal

The number of babies born with drug withdrawal symptoms from opioids grew substantially faster in rural communities than in cities, according to the University of Michigan study. The study did not distinguish between opioid pain medication and illegal opioids such as heroin.

Newborns exposed to opioids in the womb and who experience withdrawal symptoms after birth (neonatal abstinence syndrome) are more likely to have seizures, low birthweight, breathing, sleeping and feeding problems.

Researchers found that in rural areas, the rate of newborns diagnosed with neonatal abstinence syndrome increased from nearly one case per 1,000 births from 2003-2004 to 7.5 cases from 2012-2013. That's a surge nearly 80% higher than the growth rate of such cases in urban communities.

"The opioid epidemic has hit rural communities especially hard and we found that these geographical disparities also affect pregnant women and infants," says lead author and pediatrician Nicole Villapiano, MD, whose study was published in JAMA Pediatrics.

Using national data, researchers found that rural infants accounted for over 21 percent of all infants born with neonatal abstinence syndrome. In 2003, rural infants made up only 13 percent of the neonatal abstinence syndrome cases in the U.S.  

Maternal use of opioids in rural counties was nearly 70 percent higher than in urban counties. Rural infants and mothers with opioid-related diagnoses were more likely to be from lower-income families, have public insurance and be transferred to another hospital following delivery.

Villapiano says families in urban areas typically have better access to addiction treatment programs.

"We need to consider what kind of support moms with opioid disorders have in rural communities," she said.

Villapiano suggests that increasing the number of rural doctors authorized to prescribe the addiction treatment drug buprenorphine (Suboxone), as well as expanding rural mental health and substance abuse services, would be good first steps in reversing the trend in neonatal abstinence syndrome.

Living With Chronic Pain in an Opioid Hostile World

By Robert Hale, Guest Columnist

I am 50 years old and suffer from late-stage Ankylosing Spondylitis.  My entire spine has fused, along with my entire neck.  I cannot look left or right, nor up and down.  My shoulders are in the process of fusing.

I have a broken clavicle – broken in two places – that refuses to heal. I also suffer from peripheral neuropathy in my legs, which makes walking feel like treading on broken glass. 

My disease is degenerative, progressive and incurable. The only relief I can get is with opioids.  Taking long acting morphine and hydromorphone as a breakthrough medication, has literally saved my life.  I do not get any joy or “high” from these medications -- only relief from pain -- which is as close to a miracle as could be hoped for, for someone in my situation.

ROBert HALE

For the last 10 years, I have been seeing doctors, both in the field of palliative care and pain management. Early on, we managed to find a dose of opoid medication that was appropriate for me, and I began my life anew.

No longer bed-bound and useless, but able to function again, and become a productive member of my family and society.  I opened up a guitar shop and began working again – albeit at a gentle pace – and I really felt that my life was worth living again. 

I wasn’t happy to be taking pills every day to achieve this feeling of well-being, but it beat the alternative.  I asked my doctor, a wonderful, empathetic and kind doctor, how long I would have to be on these medications.  He told me, “Probably for the rest of your life”. 

Sadly, my awesome doctor left the palliative care clinic I was attending, and I was forced to move to a pain clinic in Overland Park, Kansas.  It is run by a highly respected pain management doctor, who took one look at me, asked me to walk down the hall and back, and knew immediately that I was a good candidate for the medications I had been taking.

For several years more, everything was fine – the doctors and nurses were great. Of course I had to sign a patient contract, agreeing to take my medications as prescribed (which I always do), not to take anything else, including illegal drugs, and not to share my medications with anyone.  I also was subjected to frequent urinalysis to prove that I was complying with my treatment plan. 

I never strayed from that plan, nor did I ever have a drug test showing anything but what it should.  I was, in the words of one of my nurse practitioners, the “perfect patient.”  I took the meds I was prescribed, exactly as they were meant to be used.

I am not an addictive personality, so I never was tempted to use my medications to try to get high, nor do I think I am addicted to my pain medications. I do have a tolerance to them, which is unavoidable in my situation.  I have been on large doses of morphine and hydromorphone for over 10 years. I’ve learned to respect these powerful drugs, and to treat them with great care.

The "New Cruelty"

Unfortunately, ever since the CDC opioid prescribing guidelines were released, stating that the maximum dose for any one person should be no more than 90 mg of morphine equivalent opioids per day, my pain care has changed for the worst.

The guidelines clearly state that they are meant for general practitioners, not doctors who specialize in pain management. However every pain doctor I have contacted see the guidelines as rules, and they have begun a relentless campaign of reduced opioid prescribing.  All of the pain clinics in my area have followed suit.  My pain doctor even went so far as to sell his practice to one of his partners.  I suspect this is so he couldn’t be blamed for the “new cruelty,” as I like to put it. 

It is very disturbing to talk to him these days – it’s like he is a completely different person. Gone is the compassion, the empathetic “do no harm” doctor that I had gotten to know over the last several years.  He now claims that the reason he no longer prescribes the meds we need is because of the danger of overdose.

If a doctor like him can be swayed by this propaganda, there are at least a thousand more around the country acting the same way. 

Some chronic pain patients have it worse than me, although it is difficult for me to imagine that, as my increase in pain levels has literally left me all but crippled.  I have told the pain clinic this, but they just look at me and say, “Oh, I’m sorry.  You’ll get through this somehow.”  But they know better. 

I have already had my medications reduced drastically, to about a tenth of the dose I have been safely taking for years, and I am absolutely miserable.  My days are once again filled with unrelenting pain, and on top of that, I am suffering from opioid withdrawal. I constantly feel like I have the flu, and can only sleep 2 to 4 hours every night.  I am back to being bed-bound most of the time, and it is physical torture to do the simplest things like dressing and showering. 

I cannot help around the house, to help my father who is 77-years old.  He just lost his wife, and my mother, to Alzheimer’s disease, and he needs me.  And I need him.  I can no longer play with my dog, Aya.  This breaks my heart – she deserves so much better.  

The worst part is, I’ll be back in the pain clinic next month, to have my dosage cut down again, because I have not agreed to have an intrathecal morphine pump installed in my body – an option that is not available to me, due to the fusion of my spine.  Other doctors have warned me not to have this procedure done, so it’s back to the clinic to get my meds cut down again.  Pretty soon, I’m going to be at a level of pain that the tiny amount of morphine they will allow won’t even touch.  What am I to do?

Here is a link to an excellent article on PNN, headlined “Pain Care Shouldn’t Be Political Theater” by Dr. Richard Oberg, a man whose disease is in the same family as mine.  

“The current hysteria over opioid pain medication is, without a doubt, the most unbelievable and difficult situation for patients I've ever seen in my 30 years of practice,” Oberg wrote.

Something is going to have to change, and fast, or a large percentage of the chronic pain patients in this country are going to die by their own hands, or be forced to find their medicines through illegal means, or switch to drugs like heroin and become statistics themselves.  I am just one voice, but I speak for thousands. There are so many of us who are unable to even summon the energy needed to type a column such as this. 

I just read an article stating that since the CDC guidelines were put in place, the rate of suicides among pain patients may be rising. I’m not surprised at all.  I think about it all the time now. The only thing keeping me here is the fact that I have people who depend on me, and the fact that I think suicide is a sin. I don’t want to wind up having to learn all these life lessons again. 

Please, for the love of God, listen to my words: Most of us are too weak and too sick to even make a plea, so I’m doing this on behalf of all those who are too weak to even type a letter to their congressmen or the people who can make a difference.  Stop treating chronic pain patients like drug addicts! 

We don’t even like the damned pills, but without them, we are in a living hell – an evil downhill spiral that can only end in madness, addiction to illegal drugs, or death.

Robert Hale lives in Kansas City, MO. He was diagnosed with Ankylosing Spondylitis at the age of 27.

Pain News Network invites other readers to share their stories with us.  Send them to:  editor@PainNewsNetwork.org

The information in this column should not be considered as professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. It is for informational purposes only and represents the author’s opinions alone. It does not inherently express or reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Pain News Network.

Can Running Help Prevent Osteoarthritis?

By Pat Anson, Editor

People suffering from aching muscles and joint pain are often told that exercise is the best remedy. It sounds counter-intuitive, but now there’s evidence that running can actually reduce joint inflammation – at least in the knees.

"It flies in the face of intuition," says Matt Seeley, an associate professor of exercise science at Brigham Young University. "This idea that long-distance running is bad for your knees might be a myth."

Seeley and his colleagues conducted a small study of six healthy men and women who ran on treadmills for 30 minutes. Blood samples and synovial fluid from their knee joints were collected both before and after they ran.

The researchers found that two inflammatory markers in the synovial fluid -- cytokines named GM-CSF and IL-15 -- decreased in concentration in the runners after a treadmill session.  Cytokines are small proteins released by cells that play an important role in pain and inflammation.

"What we now know is that for young, healthy individuals, exercise creates an anti-inflammatory environment that may be beneficial in terms of long-term joint health," said Robert Hyldahl, a BYU assistant professor of exercise science.

image courtesy of Nate Edwards/BYU

The findings, published in the European Journal of Applied Physiology, indicate that running may be chondroprotective, which means exercise may help delay the onset of joint diseases such as osteoarthritis (OA), a disorder that leads to thinning of cartilage and progressive joint damage. Nearly 40 percent of Americans over the age of 45 have some degree of knee OA.

“This is the first study to evaluate a wide panel of inflammatory mediators in the knee joints of healthy subjects following running. Our results suggest that running decreases intra-articular inflammation and brings to light a novel potential mechanism for the chondroprotective nature of exercise in non-pathologic knees,” the BYU researchers said.

The researchers now plan to study subjects with previous knee injuries, by conducting similar tests on people who have suffered ACL injuries.

"This study does not indicate that distance runners are any more likely to get osteoarthritis than any other person," Seeley said. "Instead, this study suggests exercise can be a type of medicine."

A Pained Life: Too Many Pain Pills

By Carol Levy, Columnist

I have a confession to make. I watch a number of the court TV shows. Sometimes they can actually teach me something, sometimes they are laughable. Sometimes they are cringe worthy. Sometimes they are simply infuriating.

The judge on one show uses his program as a platform to vilify “pain pills.”

A plaintiff or defendant is invited to tell their story. More often than not, it is a hard luck story. Within a few minutes, many of them blame much of their life struggles on substance abuse problems. Sometimes it is a happier story. They have kicked their drug addiction.

Either way, the judge is curious. “How did you get started using these drugs?” he asks.

The most common answer is that they had a bad back, toothache, neck pain, etc.

“I started to take pain medication for it, and next thing I knew I was addicted and my life spiraled out of control,” they often say.

The judge nods sagaciously and pronounces his sentence on opioids: “Oh yes. It is easy to get addicted to them.”

Never mentioned, and I do understand the issue of time and editing, is the benefit of these medications for those in legitimate pain. Or that those with chronic pain rarely become addicted to them. Instead, the false narrative continues to stand: Pain pills are given for specious reasons and quickly lead to addiction.

Also omitted is the question: “Where do these pills come from?”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention states: “Since 1999, the amount of prescription opioids sold in the U.S. nearly quadrupled, yet there has not been an overall change in the amount of pain that Americans report.“

The CDC reported last week that 17,536 Americans died in 2015 from overdoses of prescription pain medication, a 4 percent increase from the year before.

Patients don't write these prescriptions, yet the CDC’s opioid guidelines and other government regulations seem intended to punish them. As a result, we need to go to the doctor more often. That means more money, more trips, and more waiting. As I write that, I can see folks without pain saying, “So what?”

The “what” is that having to make these extra trips usually translates into more pain, which may necessitate taking even more pain meds. The guidelines meant to “help” may actually increase the need for opioids.

But the CDC itself has let on where the problem lies.

It is not with the patient. It is with the doctors and prescribers who give out these prescriptions like candy. A dentist giving a 30-day supply for a tooth extraction, or a primary care doctor prescribing narcotics to a patient with lower back pain or other issues that could well respond to physical therapy, aspirin, and changing their behavior.  They are the culprits.

The source of the problem is clear. Too many prescriptions are being written by too many doctors.

The CDC guidelines let them off the hook. And puts the patient on it.

Carol Jay Levy has lived with trigeminal neuralgia, a chronic facial pain disorder, for over 30 years. She is the author of “A Pained Life, A Chronic Pain Journey.” 

Carol is the moderator of the Facebook support group “Women in Pain Awareness.” Her blog “The Pained Life” can be found here.

The information in this column should not be considered as professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. It is for informational purposes only and represent the author’s opinions alone. It does not inherently express or reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Pain News Network.

7 Tips for Peace and Calm in the Busy Holiday Season

By Ellen Lenox Smith, Columnist

When the holidays are upon us, we tend to go into overload. Our minds are filled with all the things that have to get done. Maybe it’s presents to buy or make, meals to plan, company to prepare for, or packing for travel away from home.

We get so busy wrapping, cooking, cleaning and planning that, before you know it, your mind is spinning. If we aren’t careful, we get so wound up and tired that we can easily slip away from enjoying and experiencing the meaning these times with family and friends should have for us.

For those of us living with chronic pain and illness, it can also unintentionally cause a setback with our health. Life is difficult enough already without adding holiday stress to it.

Take the time to protect your health and learn to make it a priority among all the other things you need to take care of.

Here are seven tips to put peace and calm back into your life, while still enjoying the holiday season:

1)  Do your best to stick to your normal routine. Be honest with yourself and your body. If you are too tired or have too much pain, do what is best for you. There is nothing wrong with “not feeling up to it.” Give yourself permission to cut yourself that break.

2)  If you have chronic pain or illness, share with people that really want to know the truth. Many friends and family really don’t understand what you are coping with, possibly due to distance. Maybe you have had little contact, they don’t know how to approach what is happening with your life, or maybe they have chosen to ignore and not support you. 

It is a painful thing to experience when family and friends slip away. But in time, you will find others living with pain and illness that are more understanding and compassionate. Try to find that network, and learn how to live with and someday forgive those that don’t know how to be around the “new you.”  It will someday be their regret for their lack of compassion. Remember, there are many people out there that could use your friendship. Consider reaching out to others in need.

3)  Attempt to simplify your life to prevent the exhaustion many of us experience. One way our family has accomplished this is to no longer buy presents for each family member. A few years ago, we began selecting the name of one person and buying a present for them and no one else, except the children in the family. This had to be the most relaxing decision added to the holiday! The pressure is gone, and we now get to gather and just enjoy being together. 

This year, we have decided to take this idea one step further. We're donating the money that we would have spent on that one person to some person or cause that we want to help support.  We will share, when we all gather together, what we chose to do with our donation. We are all looking forward to hearing each others' choices. 

4)  Being with family and friends can be both wonderful and stressful. Try to make sure the conversations stay on a positive track.  When the topic appears to be getting into testy waters, try to sway the conversation away from negative topics. 

We have all had to calm down and regroup from the stress of the election, so try to steer away from anymore negative talk, blame and judgement. The Today Show even suggested that if you are the host, to set the rules and explain that this is a calm gathering. Consider designating a separate room if someone needs to talk politics. 

We have all experienced finding out that people we love and respect did not vote as we did. It can be a trial to hold onto these relationships, when there are dramatic differences of opinion we didn’t necessarily expect to find out about. We need to accept those differences and still appreciate the good in each other.

5)  If you don’t have a lot of space for overnight company, then be honest and provide them with suggestions nearby where they can stay. You want to enjoy your company and not end up resenting their presence. They could still join you for meals and activities, but provide you some much needed rest and quiet when they step away.

Share the responsibilities. There is no reason why each person can’t help bring part of the meal. Don’t take on so much that by the time your company arrives, you are really too exhausted to enjoy them. Maybe you could consider making some dishes in advance and thaw them out before they arrive. That can be your secret!

6)  Try to create calm in your home. Consider playing soft music to fill the air. That can be very relaxing, along with scented candles. Consider asking guests to put their electronic devices away or even collect them, so you can focus on each other and not those screens. There is plenty of time to catch up on messages and postings later. Let this be the time to truly be together.

7)  Make a list of things that come into your mind, in advance of the gathering, of things that need to be done that can help make things go more smoothly. Many of us living with pain get “brain fog” and can easily forget. I find this simple task takes the stress off me, knowing that I will read that list and remember all the things I need to keep me safe, medicated and protected.

Being with family and friends can leave us with wonderful memories. But exhaustion, caused by pushing and pushing yourself, ends up deleting the fun. Those of us living with chronic pain and illness can’t afford to set our health back by pretending all is just fine.

Rest, make simple plans, share the responsibility, and learn how to relax and enjoy. You won’t regret it.

 Happy holidays!

Ellen Lenox Smith suffers from Ehlers Danlos syndrome and sarcoidosis. Ellen and her husband Stuart live in Rhode Island. They are co-directors for medical marijuana advocacy for the U.S. Pain Foundation and serve as board members for the Rhode Island Patient Advocacy Coalition.

For more information about medical marijuana, visit their website.

The information in this column should not be considered as professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. It is for informational purposes only and represents the author’s opinions alone. It does not inherently express or reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Pain News Network.