Lack of Education Is Fueling Overdose Crisis

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Anti-opioid activists have long claimed that excessive prescribing of opioids over a decade ago created an “epidemic of addiction” that lingers to this day. Once hooked on prescription opioids, patients turned to stronger and more lethal drugs — like heroin and illicit fentanyl — sending the overdose rate to record levels.

A large new study debunks that theory, showing that socioeconomic factors – particularly lack of education -- play a hidden but central role in the overdose crisis.

"The analysis shows that the opioid crisis increasingly has become a crisis involving Americans without any college education," said lead author David Powell, PhD, a senior economist at RAND, a nonprofit research organization. "The study suggests large and growing education disparities within all racial and ethnic groups --- disparities that have accelerated since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic."

Powell looked at data from the National Vital Statistics System from 2000 to 2021, and identified over 912,000 fatal overdoses for which there was education information on the people who died.

His findings, published in JAMA Health Forum, show that overdose deaths increased sharply among Americans without a college education and nearly doubled in recent years for those who don’t have a high school diploma. The findings are notable because they came during a period when per capita consumption of prescription opioids plummeted, sinking to levels last seen in 2000.

For people with no college education, the overdose death rate increased from 12 deaths per 100,000 individuals in 2000 to 82 deaths per 100,000 in 2021. That rate is sharply higher than Americans who have some college education. In 2000, their overdose rate was 4.6 deaths per 100,000 people, which rose to 18.6 deaths per 100,000 in 2021.

Trends in Overdose Deaths by Educational Attainment

JAMA HEALTH FORUM

Powell is not the first researcher to link socioeconomic factors to overdose deaths. The so-called “deaths of despair” were first reported in 2015 by Princeton researchers Angus Deaton and Anne Case, who found that economic, social and emotional stress were major factors in the reduced life expectancy of middle-aged white Americans, who increasingly turned to substance abuse to dull their physical and emotional pain.

Education plays a significant role in socioeconomic status. People without college degrees are more likely to have blue-collar jobs requiring manual labor, which raise the risk of work-related injuries and conditions such as arthritis. One recent study found that people who did not finish high school in West Virginia, Arkansas and Alabama were three times more likely to have joint pain compared to those with bachelor degrees in California, Nevada and Utah.

“Overall, the analysis suggests that the opioid crisis has increasingly become a crisis disproportionately impacting those without any college education. Research is needed to understand the driving forces behind this gradient, such as isolating the independent roles of differences in income, employment, family composition, health care access, and other factors,” said Powell.

“Overdose death rates grew during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the education gradient increased further, although it is unclear what role the pandemic had relative to changes in fentanyl penetration in illicit drug markets and other factors.”

Powell says education merits further attention in understanding how and why the opioid crisis continues to intensify and lower U.S. life-expectancy.

Computer Algorithms Improve Timeliness of Overdose Data

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

An automated process using computer algorithms to analyze death certificates would speed up and improve data collection on drug overdose deaths, according to a new study by UCLA researchers.

The current system used to track U.S. overdose deaths relies on medical examiners and county coroners – including some with little medical training -- to determine the cause of death and drugs involved. Death certificates are then sent to local jurisdictions or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which codes them according to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Edition (ICD-10).

The coding process is manual and time consuming, resulting in delays of several months before the deaths are included in CDC overdose data. With drug deaths at record levels and more dangerous substances entering the illicit drug supply, researchers say that antiquated system delays an effective public health response.

"The overdose crisis in America is the number one cause of death in young adults, but we don't know the actual number of overdose deaths until months after the fact," said lead author David Goodman-Meza, MD, assistant professor of medicine in the division of infectious diseases at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA.

"We also don't know the number of overdoses in our communities, as rapidly released data is only available at the state level, at best. We need systems that get this data out fast and at a local level so public health can respond. Machine learning and natural language processing can help bridge this gap."

Goodman-Meza and his colleagues used computer algorithms to analyze the text for keywords in nearly 35,500 death certificates from nine U.S. counties in 2020. The counties include major cities such as Chicago, Los Angeles, San Diego and Milwaukee.

The researchers say their automated system demonstrated “excellent diagnostic performance” in classifying the drugs involved in overdoses.

“We found that for most substances evaluated, the performance of these algorithms was perfect or near perfect. These models could be used to automate classification of unstructured free-text, thus avoiding the manual and time-consuming process of individually reading each entry and classifying them to a specific substance,” researchers reported in JAMA Network Open.

“Excellent performance was shown for multiple substances, including any opioid, heroin, fentanyl, methamphetamine, cocaine, and alcohol using models for general text. Yet for prescription opioids and benzodiazepines, there was a considerable performance gap.”

That “performance gap” is due in part to weaknesses in the drug classification system, which lumps many synthetic opioids under the same ICD-10 code, including fentanyl, fentanyl analogs, tramadol and buprenorphine – a semi-synthetic opioid used in the addiction treatment drug Suboxone.

In the past, CDC has classified all drug deaths using that code as “prescription opioid overdoses” even though the drugs may have been illicit --- which is the case for the vast majority of deaths involving fentanyl. This resulted in government estimates of prescription opioid overdoses being significantly inflated for many years.

Using the computer algorithms developed at UCLA, prescription opioids ranked far behind fentanyl, alcohol and other substances identified as the cause of death in 8,738 overdoses.

Drugs Involved in 2020 Overdose Deaths in 9 U.S. Counties

Source: JAMA Network Open

Until recently, there was a 6-month time lag in drug deaths being counted in the CDC’s monthly Provisional Drug Overdose Death Counts report. The timeliness of the reports were improved earlier this year to a 4-month delay, but Goodman-Meza says they could be improved even more.  

"If these algorithms are embedded within medical examiner's offices, the time could be reduced to as early as toxicology testing is completed, which could be about three weeks after the death," he said.

Would Drug Legalization Reduce Overdoses?

By Roger Chriss, PNN Columnist

As the overdose crisis worsens, public health data and biostatistics become more important. Debates about opioid prescribing and drug legalization often center on two key concepts: incidence and prevalence as applied to drug use, substance use disorder (SUD) and overdoses.

Brandeis University researcher Andrew Kolodny, MD, recently argued against drug legalization on Twitter.

“Some critics of reducing Rx opioids don't believe that repeated use of highly addictive drugs cause addiction and/or they believe all drugs, including heroin & cocaine should be available over the counter. They don't believe that easy access can increase prevalence of SUD,” said Kolodny, who founded Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing (PROP), an anti-opioid activist group.

Conversely, Columbia University professor Carl Hart, the author of “Drug Use for Grown-Ups,” believes legalizing recreational drugs would help reduce overdoses by making the drug supply safer.

“A large proportion of these deaths are caused by adulterated substances purchased on the illicit market. A regulated market, with uniform quality standards, would virtually put an end to contaminated drug consumption and greatly reduce fatal accidental drug overdoses,” Hart told Columbia Magazine.

Both claims hinge on a proper understanding of incidence and prevalence. In epidemiology, incidence is the rate of new-onset diagnosis of a medical condition. It is measured over a given period of time -- typically a year -- though sometimes the time period is shortened to a week for an urgent problem, such as a viral pathogen like the coronavirus.

By contrast, prevalence measures the total number of people in a population who have a specific medical condition. For prevalence, the duration of the condition is important. For an infectious disease, it may be brief. But for cancer, SUD and many other chronic conditions, it may last a lifetime.

For instance, the incidence of opioid use disorder (OUD) among people who are on long-term opioid therapy is 8-12%, according to the National Institutes of Health. But unlike claims frequently made by PROP, only a small fraction of patients who abuse prescription opioids start using heroin, less than 4% over a five-year period. So, making a clear distinction between OUD involving prescription opioids versus heroin becomes important.

The prevalence of OUD is a cumulative total of all people with OUD over time. This is because OUD and other substance use disorder diagnoses are lifetime diagnoses that remain on a person’s medical records forever. When we count people with OUD, we are counting everyone ever diagnosed with the condition, though in practice sometimes the OUD diagnosis is dropped due to administrative error, poor record-keeping or deliberate obfuscation.

This means that OUD prevalence can go up over time even when the incidence of OUD is going down. In fact, that is what is happening at present.

A recent report from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Association showed modest declines for both prescription opioid misuse and heroin use. This came at a time when U.S. drug deaths were rising, fueled primarily by overdoses involving illicit fentanyl.

These counterintuitive trends make for intense debate about the success or failure of the 2016 CDC opioid guideline and state laws restricting prescription opioid use. A recent study from Indiana University concluded that limits on legal opioid prescribing may have actually driven more people to illicit drugs.

"Our work reveals the unintended and negative consequences of policies designed to reduce the supply of opioids in the population for overdose. We believe that policy goals should be shifted from easy solutions such as dose reduction to more difficult fundamental ones, focusing on improving social conditions that create demand for opioids and other illicit drugs," said co-author Brea Perry, PhD, a professor of sociology at Indiana University.

Even if drug legalization were to reduce drug risks, an increase in the number of drug users could lead to more harms. For instance, if an illicit drug harms 10% of users and there are 1 million users, that results in 100,000 people harmed. If that drug is then legalized and made safer, harming only 1% of users, that seems like an improvement. But if the number of users rises to 15 million, then 150,000 people would be harmed.

Since we don’t know how these numbers would change under a legalized drug regime, any claims about changes in incidence or prevalence are speculative at best.

What is counted and how it is expressed are very important in debates about the role of prescription opioids or drugs in general in SUD and overdose deaths. A failure to be specific about methodology or using data that is not well-founded can result in specious or even deceptive claims. And counterintuitive results are possible, as we are seeing at present in the ever-evolving overdose crisis.

Roger Chriss lives with Ehlers Danlos syndrome and is a proud member of the Ehlers-Danlos Society. Roger is a technical consultant in Washington state, where he specializes in mathematics and research.

Cannabis Significantly Reduced Rx Opioid Use in Chronic Pain Patients

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Nearly half of chronic pain patients using medical cannabis reported significant improvement in their pain levels and most were able to reduce or stop their use of opioid pain medication, according to a large new study.

The findings, recently published in the journal Cureus, involved 550 chronic pain patients being treated at three licensed medical cannabis clinics in the northeastern United States. The study is one of the first to look at patients who were prescribed opioids for at least three months and continued to use opioids after starting cannabis therapy.

“Our results show a remarkable percentage of patients both reporting complete cessation of opioids and decreasing opioid usage by the addition of medical cannabis, with results lasting for over a year for the majority,” wrote lead author Kevin Takakuwa, MD, an emergency medicine physician affiliated with the Society of Cannabis Clinicians.

“We hypothesize these effects may be due to the reported synergistic decrease in pain that has been shown with adding cannabis to opioids. Likely, as a result, the majority expressed not wanting opioids in the future, particularly those in the younger age group.”

Pain patients enrolled in the study initially took a small amount of cannabis orally (a balanced blend of THC and CBD) and titrated to a higher dose until it had an effect.

Almost half (48%) reported a significant decrease in their pain, and most said they had improved quality of life (87%) and better physical function (80%) while using medical cannabis.

Most reported they either stopped using prescription opioids (40%) or reduced their opioid use (45%).  Nearly two thirds said they sustained the change for over a year (65%) and did not want to take opioids again (63%).  

“One reason for our impressive results may be the focused protocol employed by the study sites, which recommends a small amount of oral cannabis taken in conjunction with each opioid medication dose with small increments to titration, in a motivated patient population,” wrote Takakuwa.

“There has never been a randomized controlled human trial examining how to use medical cannabis in combination with opioids and there is no established protocol that exists. Experts disagree on how to manage opioid prescriptions in patients with chronic pain who use cannabis, and many clinicians defer to the patient or dispensary agent on decisions regarding specific cannabis products and dosages.”

But some doctors take another approach and simply get rid of patients after learning they use cannabis. It’s worth noting that nearly one in four patients (24.8%) enrolled in the study reported losing access to prescription medication or medical care as a result of their cannabis use or after testing positive for THC.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention specifically recommends that doctors not test for THC or dismiss patients for their cannabis use “because this could constitute patient abandonment and could have adverse consequences for patient safety” by forcing them to live with untreated pain or turn to street drugs.

Study Launched to Look at Suicides of Chronic Pain Patients

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

One of the more unrecognized and under-reported aspects of the opioid crisis is what happened to millions of chronic pain patients in the U.S. who were tapered or cut off from opioid medication in the name of preventing addiction and overdoses.

We know a lot about opioid prescribing. The number of prescriptions has fallen by about a third since their peak. And the supply of opioid pain relievers, according to the DEA, is at its lowest level since 2006.  We can literally count them down to the last pill.

But we don’t know what happened to the patients. How many were abandoned by their doctors? How many became disabled or lost their jobs? How many died from strokes or heart attacks? How many surrendered to despair by taking their own lives? We simply don’t know.

Critics say pain patients have fallen through the wide cracks of a cruel and willfully blind public health experiment.

“I’ve seen patients destabilized and nearly die by suicide after prescription opioids were stopped. I’ve been receiving notice of these for several years now. And I’ve never really been in a situation where a large number of patients were dying and health systems do not systematically study it and try to stop it,” says Stefan Kertesz, MD, a professor of medicine at University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB).

“We have setup systems that insist on measuring prescription opioid doses and incentivizing reduction, but which are not measuring the outcomes of that change in care. Hospitals and clinics are not even asked to check what happened to the patient.”

In one of the first efforts to find out, Kertesz and co-investigator Allyson Varley, PhD, are recruiting family members and close friends of pain patients who died by suicide for a study to see what happened to their loved ones after changes were made in their opioid medication.

“What we’re trying to do is marry what patients are telling us is needed with scientific rigor, so that the appropriate people will listen to us when we say there is a problem,” said Varley, who works in the UAB Center for Addiction and Pain Prevention and Intervention.

“We are very committed to this. As long as people are having unsuccessful tapers, we’re interested in studying what’s happening and how to make it better, by increasing access to the care that you need when you have chronic pain, whether that’s opioids or not.”

Reaching Out to Survivors

The dead can no longer speak for themselves, which is why the survey is focused on reaching surviving loved ones who witnessed the pain and despair of their deceased spouse, child, parent, partner or friend.  

“We have to reach survivors who believe that is what they saw, and who can provide some preliminary information to hint that is really what happened,” Kertesz explained.

No one knows with any certainty how many pain patients have died by suicide in recent years, but it probably runs in the thousands. We’ve shared some of their stories on PNN, including that of Meredith Lawrence, who witnessed the suicide of her husband, Jay.

“I lost my husband in 2017 by suicide after his medications were taken away,” Lawrence said. “At that point, I wrote about our experience for the public, and it drew attention nationally. To see Dr. Kertesz and his colleagues take this seriously matters to me because nobody should lose a loved one over something treatable.”  

Much of the groundwork for the UAB survey was laid by patient advocate Anne Fuqua, who began compiling information about patient suicides several years ago. Her list has grown to over 100 well-documented suicides.

“This is truly a dream come true that these deaths are being taken seriously. When a dear friend died of a heart attack in 2014, the only way I could cope was finding and memorializing these deaths,” said Fuqua. “I could never have imagined this would come to fruition.”

Suicides Rising

The suicide rate in the U.S. has risen by about a third since the turn of the century, but there is no easy explanation for the increase. Suicides usually involve multiple factors, such as inadequate healthcare, mental health issues, drug and alcohol abuse, social isolation and economic inequality – what has been called “deaths of despair.” Throw in poorly treated or untreated pain and you have a recipe for suicidal thoughts.

Kertesz and Varley are hoping to get at least 200 family members and friends to participate in their survey. More would be better, because it could lead to larger studies that will help them document what is happening in the pain community.

“If we can convince people that this is a tragedy that needs to stop and we are passionately committed to it, and some people come forward, maybe we can get external funding to allow us to do the research that’s really needed,” says Kertesz. “It’s very hard to make the case when you don’t have pilot data to show that these families are willing to come forward.

“If one outcome of starting the study is that policymakers begin to realize that there is a serious risk to having physicians flee their patients, that would be a helpful outcome. It might change the dialogue a bit.”  

To participate in the online survey, click here. Or call 1-866-283-7223. The survey will take about 25 minutes. Respondents will be asked a series of questions about the loved one who died, their healthcare and life situation at the time of death.

CDC Study Finds ‘No Significant Change’ in Use of Rx Opioids

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

A new study by CDC researchers has a surprise finding, concluding that there has been “no significant change in the use of prescription opioids” over the past decade by U.S. adults.

The study is based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, in which a nationally representative sample of nearly 20,000 adults is asked every two years about their healthcare and nutrition.

Although the number of opioid prescriptions in the U.S. has dropped 43% since their peak in 2011, the survey found that the use of opioid medication hasn’t changed much at all.  

In 2017–2018, the survey found that 5.7% of U.S. adults used one or more prescription opioids in the past 30 days, compared to 6.2% of adults a decade earlier.

“Between 2009–2010 and 2017–2018, no significant trend in the use of prescription opioids was observed; however, an increasing trend in the use of nonopioid prescription pain medications without prescription opioids was seen,” researchers found.

USE OF PRESCRIPTION PAIN MEDICATIONS BY U.S. ADULTS

SOURCE: CDC

In 2017-2018, women (6.4%) were more likely to be prescribed opioids than men (4.9%). The use of opioids increased with age, from 2.8% among young adults aged 20–39 to 8.2% for those aged 60 and over.

The use of opioid prescriptions was highest among whites (6.4%), followed by blacks (5.2%), Hispanics (3.4%) and Asian adults (1.4%).

The survey did not ask respondents about the dose of opioids they were prescribed, which may account for the discrepancy with other prescription drug databases.    

A 2018 study by the health analytics firm IQVIA found a significant decline in the number of high dose opioid prescriptions of 90 MME (morphine milligram equivalent) or more. But low dose prescriptions of 20 MME or less remained relatively stable.

While the percentage of Americans using opioid prescriptions has remained relatively flat over the past decade, according to the survey, there was a notable increase in the use of non-opioid prescription pain relievers, which rose from 4.3% in 2009-2010 to 5.7% in 2017-2018.

Migraine drugs, COX-2 inhibitors, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were classified in the survey as non-opioid prescription pain relievers, but anti-depressants and anti-convulsants were not – even though they are increasingly used to treat pain. The IQVIA study found 67 million prescriptions for the anti-convulsant medication gabapentin (Neurontin) in 2018 — a fact that is not reflected in the CDC findings.

The CDC is currently preparing an update of its controversial 2016 opioid guideline, which has been widely adopted as policy by other federal agencies, states, insurers, pharmacies and many doctors — who have used it as an excuse to take people off opioids or greatly reduce their doses.

The updated guideline – which is expected in late 2021 -- is likely to expand the CDC’s recommendations to include the use of opioids for treating short-term acute pain.

I’m a POW in the Opioid Crisis

By Douglas Hughes, Guest Columnist

If you can hear the muffled sound of champagne being uncorked by lawmakers viewing my image, it’s no mistake. They have ignored my cries for help for a number of years, along with those of millions of other intractable pain sufferers.

I am 69 years old and have lost over forty pounds since August 2018. I am 6’2” and weigh 139 pounds, less than I did in eighth grade.

I cannot get anyone to care for me medically. I eat all the time, something else is wrong.  I had to change my primary care provider just to get a simple eye exam, the kind you do in a hallway. When tested, I could only see the top "E" with one eye. I had rapid-advancing cataracts.  

My picture is reality!  We have been so stigmatized and basic medical treatment denied to us, while the opioid pain therapies which kept us alive were abruptly taken away to profit from our deaths. 

Does my image impart distress? If not, you may hold the fortitude and inhumanity required for public office today. In West Virginia, elected officials still believe the opioid crisis is a due to a single drug -- prescription opioids -- diverted from a single source: pain clinics.

DOUGLAS HUGHES

We have done nothing morally or legally wrong to deserve the horrendous lack of basic civility that you would show a wretched animal. I frequently relate my desire to be treated as a dog. Not in humor, but for the compassion that a dog would get if it was suffering like I am. 

The federal government has gone to extraordinary measures to brutalize the functionally disabled for personal enrichment and fiduciary windfall for programs like Medicare, Veterans Affairs, Workers Compensation, Medicaid, private retirements plans and others.

The largest windfall is to health insurance companies, which reap immense savings by curtailing the lingering lives of their most costly beneficiaries, the elderly and disabled. 

You May Be Next

Since the Vietnam War, there have been many advances in emergency medicine. More people are saved each year, yet left in constant pain. In the blink of an eye, you could become one. A car wreck, botched surgery or numerous health conditions can leave you with chronic or intractable pain.  

My image is a warning. I didn’t become the person you see until the government intervened in the pain treatment I was getting for 25 years. This was under the guise of a well-orchestrated effort by many state and federal agencies. 

The Drug Enforcement Administration has been the most prolific in this coordinated, decades-long effort.  In 2005, I witnessed them investigate and close a pain clinic where I was a patient.

My doctor was at the top of his field, a diagnostic virtuoso of complicated pain conditions.  He himself suffered from one pain condition of which I was aware.  No drug seeker could ever pass themselves off as a legitimate pain sufferer in his practice, yet he was harassed and forced to close because of assumptions of opioid overprescribing asserted by medically untrained law enforcement.      

It was my great fortune to have him diagnose the crushing injury in my torso and hips after twelve years of suffering.  He and two other pain specialists said I was “one of the most miserable cases” they had ever seen.

The loss of this and other outstanding professionals has repercussions even today. New doctors being trained are misled to believe the doctor-patient relationship is nonexistent. It was sacrificed to special interest greed and the conflagration of a drug crisis that will never end until that relationship is restored.

How easily has the public been misled to believe all physicians became irresponsible at the same time by treating pain conditions incorrectly with opioids? Now we have law enforcement dictating what pain treatment is appropriate. It is nonsensical at best and unimaginably inhumane at its heart.

My picture is the culmination of this government-standardized pain treatment and its consequences.  If heed is not taken immediately by the medical profession, lawmakers and society at large, you may be next to choose between suicide or emaciation.

Killing functionally disabled intractable pain sufferers like me, or non-responsive elderly in hospitals, will not stop opioid addiction, drug diversion or overdose deaths. It will however leave you a skeleton, praying for help like a prisoner of war.

Only the hearts of tyrants and fools see anything redeeming in that.

Douglas Hughes is a disabled coal miner and retired environmental permit writer in West Virginia. He recently ended his candidacy for governor due to health issues.

PNN invites other readers to share their stories. Send them to editor@painnewsnetwork.org.

High Number of Youths Using Rx Opioids

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

A large new analysis of drug use by teenagers and young adults in the U.S. has found a surprisingly high level of prescription opioid use. In a survey of over 56,000 youths, researchers found that 21% of teens and 32% of young adults said they had used opioid medication in the past year.

"The percentages were higher than we expected," said first author Joel Hudgins, MD, of Boston Children's Hospital's Division of Emergency Medicine. "They really highlight how common use of prescription opioids is in this vulnerable population."

The data from the 2015-2016 National Survey on Drug Use and Health doesn’t necessarily reflect the environment that exists today. Opioid prescriptions have fallen by 43% since their peak and last year alone declined by a record 17 percent. Many pain patients — of all ages — now have trouble getting opioids prescribed and filled.

During the study period, nearly 4% of teens and 8% of young adults reported misusing prescription opioids or having an opioid use disorder.

Misuse was defined as using opioids “in any way that a doctor did not direct you to use them,” while a use disorder was classified as recurrent use that causes significant impairment and failure to meet major responsibilities at home, work or school.

Researchers were surprised by some of the findings, which are published in the online journal PLOS One. Among youths who reported misusing prescription opioids, 57% said they obtained them from friends or relatives and only 25% percent came from healthcare providers.

"In previous studies in adults, opioids were more commonly obtained from a physician," Hudgins says. "Our findings show that the focus of prevention and treatment should include close friends and family members of adolescents and young adults, not simply prescribers."

Youths who misused opioids, particularly the young adults, often reported using other substances, including cocaine (36%), hallucinogens (49%), heroin (9%) and inhalants (30%). At least half had used tobacco, alcohol, or cannabis in the past month.

In a previous study, the same researchers found relatively high rates of opioid prescribing to youths visiting emergency rooms and outpatient clinics. About fifteen percent of youths were given opioids during ER visits from 2005 to 2015.

"Given these rates of opioid use and misuse, strong consideration should be given to screening adolescents and young adults for opioid use when they receive care," says Hudgins.

More recent surveys have found a steady decline in the misuse of prescription opioids by young people. The most recent Monitoring the Future Survey found that only 3.4% of high school seniors misused opioid medication in 2018.

Misuse of Vicodin and OxyContin among 12th graders has fallen dramatically over the past 15 years, from 10.5% in 2003 to 1.7% in 2018 for Vicodin, and from 4.5% in 2003 to 2.3% in 2018 for OxyContin.   

Are Rx Opioids Scapegoats for the Opioid Crisis?

By Dr. Lynn Webster, PNN Columnist

The Washington Post recently published a series of stories about the volume of opioid medication distributed over the past several years in the United States. Over 76 billion pills were distributed from 2002 through 2012.

That sounds like a huge amount, but it is difficult to know what the number means. What is clear is that the stories are meant to suggest the number of pills is excessive and responsible for the rise in opioid overdose deaths. 

This presumed correlation is one reason for the recent lawsuits that have been filed against opioid manufacturers and distributors. It has also spawned policies that appear to have worsened, not prevented, overdoses.

Though the situation has been framed largely as a prescribing problem, the reasons for the drug crisis are many. While overprescribing has certainly been a factor, it is probably less important than other factors, such as joblessness, homelessness and despair, which are more challenging to address.

Let’s look at the data about the relationship between opioid prescriptions and overdose death rates. The number of opioid prescriptions in the United States peaked in 2012 and began a steady decline. By 2017, they reached a 15-year low.

Despite the decline in the number of opioids prescribed, overdoses from all opioids – both legal and illegal -- continued to increase. Overdoses involving prescription opioids represent only about 25% of the total number of drug overdoses.  

Obviously, something more than the supply of prescription opioids is driving overdoses higher.

No Correlation Between Opioid Prescriptions and Overdoses

After winning a year-long court battle with the Justice Department, the Post and HD Media, publisher of the Charleston Gazette-Mail in West Virginia, were able to access data from the DEA’s Automation of Reports and Consolidated Orders System (ARCOS).

The information in the database shows that, between 2006 and 2012, West Virginia received the largest per capita amount of prescription opioids. The state also experienced the highest opioid-related death rate during that period. Is there a correlation?

Kentucky also had a high number of pills and a high death rate, but as Jacob Sullum recently reported in Reason, Kentucky’s death rate in 2017 was actually lower than Maryland’s and Utah’s, where prescription rates are substantially lower. He also pointed out that although Oregon’s prescription rate was among the highest in the country, the rate of deaths involving pain pills in Oregon was just 3.5 per 100,000, lower than the rates in most states. 

Sullum further showed that Kentucky, Nevada, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina and Tennessee were among the 10 states with the highest per capita prescribed pills during the 2006-2012 period. But they were not the states with the highest overdose rates. 

In a separate analysis, the CDC and Agency for Healthcare Research Quality found no correlation -- not even a weak one -- between opioid prescribing rates and overdoses when comparing data from each state. 

In addition, the rate of opioid prescribing is highest nationally for people 55 years and older, but that age group has the lowest rate.  

This lack of correlation between opioid overdoses and the volume of prescribed opioids is consistent internationally. In 2016, England prescribed the most opioids and saw the most overdose deaths in its history. However, the drug responsible for many of those deaths was heroin, not prescription opioids. 

There is a raging opioid crisis in West Africa where, despite a low prescription rate, the number of overdoses has surged. 

In 2018, Scotland's drug overdose rate exceeded that of the United States -- largely because of heroin. There is no evidence of an overall increase in opioid prescribing in Scotland. 

No Simple Answers to the Opioid Crisis

It is clear that the data does not support a simple answer to the opioid crisis. Focusing all of our efforts on decreasing the supply of prescriptions will not solve the problem and is already creating unintended consequences.

In fact, cocaine and methamphetamine were involved in more overdose deaths in the U.S. in 2018 than prescription opioids. As the supply of prescription opioids has decreased due to the policies of the last few years, people have moved from prescription opioids to other illicit drugs.

The solution to the opioid crisis must be multi-pronged. Overprescribing played a role in causing the crisis, but sociological factors appear to have driven the demand. We must consider what prompts people to turn to drugs in despair. A recent study published in SSM-Population shows job loss bears a significant correlation to opioid-caused deaths.

In addition, in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Princeton University economists Anne Case and Angus Deaton (recipient of the 2015 Nobel prize in economics) showed mortality from substance use was linked to declining economic opportunity and financial insecurity.

Solving the drug crisis will not be easy. However, the disenfranchised members of our most impoverished communities deserve viable solutions to their problems. It is crucial to understand the degree to which job loss and hopelessness contribute to the drug problem.

Reputable data proves that the volume of opioids prescribed is not solely, or even primarily, responsible for the opioid crisis. Let’s focus on what is responsible.

Lynn R. Webster, MD, is a vice president of scientific affairs for PRA Health Sciences and consults with the pharmaceutical industry. He is author of the award-winning book, “The Painful Truth” and co-producer of the documentary, “It Hurts Until You Die.”

The information in this column should not be considered as professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. It is for informational purposes only and represents the author’s opinions alone. It does not inherently express or reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Pain News Network.

Misleading CDC Study Links Prescription Opioids to Binge Drinking

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

A new study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has found that over half of people who misuse prescription opioids also binge drink, increasing their risk of dying from an overdose.

“We are losing far too many Americans each day from overdoses,” CDC Director Robert Redfield, MD, said in a statement. “Combining alcohol and opioids can significantly increase the risk of overdoses and deaths.”

Binge drinking and misuse of opioid medication are never a good idea, whether done separately or in combination. Unfortunately, the CDC study is written in ways that mislead and further worsen the stigma associated with prescription opioid use. And it fails to acknowledge the role CDC itself has played in the growing use of alcohol for pain relief.

The study, published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine, is based on survey of over 160,000 people who participated in the National Survey on Drug Use and Health from 2012 to 2014. After analyzing their answers, CDC researchers came to some sweeping conclusions about Americans getting high on pills and alcohol.

“Prescription opioids were responsible for approximately 17,000 deaths in the U.S. in 2016. One in five prescription opioid deaths also involve alcohol,” wrote lead author Marissa Ether, PhD, CDC Division of Population Health.

“More than half of the 4.2 million people who misused prescription opioids during 2012–2014 were binge drinkers, and binge drinkers had nearly twice the odds of misusing prescription opioids, compared with nondrinkers.”

The statement that prescription opioids “were responsible” for 17,000 deaths is misleading because it is based on data from death certificates and coroner reports that only indicate the medications were present or “involved” in overdoses. Other substances may have played a role or perhaps even caused those 17,000 deaths.

In 2016, over twice as many fatal overdoses involved heroin and illicit fentanyl, but CDC researchers “did not consider the use of illicit opioids” for their binge drinking study. Apparently, street drug users are teetotalers who do not drink.

And who were the binge drinkers who misused prescription opioids? They were recreational users of opioid medication who did not take the drugs for pain relief. “Misuse” in the study was defined as “use without a prescription or use only for the experience or feeling it causes.”

To be clear, pain patients with legitimate opioid prescriptions that are used appropriately were not included in the study. These patients are actually less likely to be binge drinkers — defined as four or more drinks by a woman, or five or more drinks by a man — and they are warned repeatedly not to mix their medications with alcohol. Including them would have significantly changed the study findings.

Patients Using Alcohol for Pain Relief

Perhaps the biggest oversight by CDC researchers is the 2012-2014 time frame chosen for their study – which is well before the agency released its controversial 2016 opioid prescribing guideline.

One of the key findings from a recent PNN survey of nearly 6,000 patients is that the guideline has limited their access to prescription opioids so severely that some are turning to alcohol for pain relief. Nearly one out of five patients surveyed said they had used alcohol for pain relief since the guideline came out.

“It has caused many pain patients to be cut off their pain medication,” one patient told us. “After losing my meds 16 months ago, I just started using alcohol and I never used alcohol. I don't like alcohol, but what are my options?” 

“Since my doctor stopped prescribing even my small amount of opioids I deal with days where I can’t even get out of bed because I hurt so much and I’m stuck turning to alcohol, excessive amounts of acetaminophen and NSAIDs,” another patient said. 

“The CDC guidelines are killing people,” one woman wrote. “My fiancé has been refused even the most mild stenosis treatment because he admitted using alcohol to treat his pain when he has no other treatment. He's mildly suicidal as well. We have two young kids.” 

“I lost a good friend to suicide because she was not able to get pain medications to relieve her pain and it was too much for her to handle,” a patient said. “Sadly, she is not the only one. I'm hearing about more and more. I'm also hearing about people turning towards alcohol.” 

“All they are doing is pushing chronic pain patients to find relief in other ways such as alcohol, illicit drugs or harming themselves to get the pain relief they do desperately seek,” wrote another patient. 

In other words, alcohol use is acceptable to the CDC — as long as it is not combined with prescribed opioid medication. This is your nation’s health protection agency at work.

The Prescription Opioid Crisis Is Over

By Roger Chriss, PNN Columnist

In a very real sense, the prescription opioid crisis is over. But it didn’t end and we didn’t win. Instead, it has evolved into a broader drug overdose crisis. Opioids are still a factor, but so is almost every other class of drug, whether prescribed or sourced on the street.

The main players in the crisis now are illicit fentanyl, cocaine and methamphetamine. The vast majority of fatal overdoses include a mixture of these drugs, with alcohol and cannabis often present, and assigning any one as the sole cause of death is becoming tricky.

Connecticut Magazine recently reported on rising fentanyl overdoses in that state. According to the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, fentanyl deaths in Connecticut spiked from 14 in 2012 to 760 in 2018. Fentanyl was involved in 75% of all overdoses last year, often in combination with other drugs

Meanwhile, overdoses involving the most widely prescribed opioid — oxycodone — fell to just 62 deaths, the lowest in years. Only about 6% of the overdoses in Connecticut were linked to oxycodone.

Similar trends can be seen nationwide, mostly east of the Mississippi. Opioids still play a major role in drug deaths, with the CDC reporting that about 68% of 70,200 drug overdose deaths in 2017 involving an opioid. But more than half of these deaths involved fentanyl and other synthetic opioids obtained on the black market.

According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse, overdoses involving prescription opioids or heroin have plateaued, while overdoses involving methamphetamine, cocaine and benzodiazepines have risen sharply.

In other words, deaths attributable to prescription opioids alone are in decline. Deaths attributable to fentanyl are spiking, and deaths involving most other drug class are rising rapidly. The CDC estimates that there are now more overdoses involving cocaine than prescription opioids or heroin.

Moreover, the crisis is evolving fast. At the American College of Medical Toxicology’s 2019 annual meeting, featured speaker Keith Humphreys, PhD, remarked that “Fentanyl was invented in the sixties. To get to 10,000 deaths took 50 years. To get to 20,000 took 12 months.”

In fact, provisional estimates from the CDC for 2018 suggest we have reached 30,000 fentanyl deaths. And state-level data show few signs of improvements for 2019.

Worryingly, methamphetamine use is resurgent. And cocaine is “making a deadly return.”  Illicit drugs are also being mixed together in novel ways, with “fentanyl speedballs” – a mixture of fentanyl with cocaine or meth – being one example.

Drug Strategies ‘Need to Evolve’

The over-emphasis on prescription opioids in the overdose crisis has led to an under-appreciation of these broader drug trends. Researchers are seeing a need for this to change.

“The rise in deaths involving cocaine and psychostimulants and the continuing evolution of the drug landscape indicate a need for a rapid, multifaceted, and broad approach that includes more timely and comprehensive surveillance efforts to inform tailored and effective prevention and response strategies,” CDC researchers reported last week. “Because some stimulant deaths are also increasing without opioid co-involvement, prevention and response strategies need to evolve accordingly.”   

It is now common to hear about the “biopsychosocial” model for treating chronic pain – understanding the complex interaction between human biology, psychology and social factors. This same model has a lot to offer substance use and drug policy.

Substance use and addiction involve a complex interplay of genetic and epigenetic factors combined with social and cultural determinants. Treatment must be more than just saying no or interdicting suppliers. At present, medication-assisted therapy for opioid use disorder remains hard to access. And other forms of addiction have no known pharmacological treatment.

Addressing the drug overdose crisis will require not only more and better treatment but also increased efforts at harm reduction, decriminalization of drug use, improvements in healthcare, and better public health surveillance and epidemiological monitoring. Further, the underlying social and cultural factors that make American culture so vulnerable to addiction must be addressed.

None of this is going to be easy. Current efforts are misdirected, making America feel helpless and look hapless. Novel and possibly disruptive options may prove useful, from treating addiction with psychedelics to reducing risks of drug use through safe injection sites and clean needle exchanges.

We are long past the prescription opioid phase of the crisis, and are now in what is variously being called a “stimulant phase” and a “poly-drug phase.” Recognition of the shape of the drug overdose crisis is an essential first step toward changing its grim trajectory.

Roger Chriss lives with Ehlers Danlos syndrome and is a proud member of the Ehlers-Danlos Society. Roger is a technical consultant in Washington state, where he specializes in mathematics and research.

The information in this column should not be considered as professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. It is for informational purposes only and represents the author’s opinions alone. It does not inherently express or reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Pain News Network.

Study Finds 90% of Medicare Patients Have Little Risk of Opioid Overdose

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Current methods used to identify Medicare patients at high risk of overdosing on prescription opioids target many people who are not really at high risk, according to a team of researchers who found that over 90% of patients have little to no risk of overdosing.

"The ability to identify such risk groups has important implications for policymakers and insurers who currently target interventions based on less accurate measures,” said lead author Wei-Hsuan "Jenny" Lo-Ciganic, PhD, a professor of pharmaceutical outcomes and policy at the University of Florida, who reported her findings in JAMA Network Open.  

Lo-Ciganic and her colleagues at the University of Pittsburgh, Carnegie Mellon University and University of Utah studied health data on over half a million Medicare beneficiaries who filled one or more prescriptions for opioids between 2011 and 2015. The researchers identified which patients overdosed and then used machine-learning algorithms to analyzed their demographics and health records.

The computer models developed three risk groups that predict which patients are at risk of overdosing over a 12 month period.

• Low risk patients (67.5%) have 0.006% risk of overdose

• Medium risk patients (23.3%) have 0.05% risk of overdose

• High risk patients (9.1%) have 1.77% risk of overdose  

Put another way, out of 100,000 Medicare patients in the low risk group, six would have an overdose; while there would be 1,770 overdoses in a high risk group of the same size.

Not surprisingly, the computer models found that high doses of opioids and a prior history of substance abuse significantly raise the risk of an overdose. So does a person’s age, disability status and whether they are co-prescribed benzodiazepines. Patients who live in certain states (Florida, Kentucky or New Jersey) are also at higher risk.

Top 10 Predictors of Opioid Overdose

1. Total MME (morphine milligram equivalent)

2. History of substance or alcohol abuse

3. Average daily MME

4. Age

5. Disability status

6. Number of opioid refills

7. Resident state

8. Type of opioid

9. Number of benzodiazepine refills

10. Drug use disorders  

The study found that the machine-learning algorithms the researchers developed performed well in predicting overdose risk and in identifying patients with a low risk. Machine learning is an alternative analytic approach to handling complex interactions in large data.  It can discover hidden patterns and generate predictions in clinical settings. Based on their findings, the researchers concluded that their approach outperformed other methods for identifying risk used by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

"Machine-learning models that use administrative data appear to be a valuable and feasible tool for identifying more accurately and efficiently individuals at high risk of opioid overdose," says Walid Gellad, MD, a professor of medicine at the University of Pittsburgh and senior author on the study. "Although they are not perfect, these models allow interventions to be targeted to the small number of individuals who are at much greater risk."

Prescription Opioids Rarely Lead to Heroin Use

By Roger Chriss, Columnist

A recent Politico column by three anti-opioid activists asserts that “opioid use disorder is common in chronic pain patients”  and that the nation’s overdose crisis “stems largely from the overprescribing of opioids.”

Andrew Kolodny, MD, Jane Ballantyne, MD, and Gary Franklin, MD --  who are the founder, president, and vice-president, respectively, of Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing (PROP) – also wrote that “many individuals become addicted to prescription opioids through medical or non-medical use, and then switch to heroin after becoming addicted."

This claim is an oversimplification of the tragedy that is heroin addiction. It both ignores the complex trajectory of drug use that culminates in heroin and omits the known risk factors of the people who suffer from heroin addiction. It also runs counter to the known data about various forms of opioid addiction, which clearly shows that most people on opioid therapy do not develop problems with misuse, abuse or addiction, and rarely move on to heroin.

The National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) estimates that about 10 percent of patients prescribed opioids develop an opioid use disorder. And only about 5 percent of those who misuse their medication ever make the transition to heroin.

Further, the number of people addicted to prescription opioids -- about two million -- has been stable for over five years, while rates of heroin use have been rising, suggesting there is not a strong corelation between the two.

From 2002 to 2016, the number of Americans using heroin nearly tripled, from 214,000 to 626,000. Overdose deaths involving heroin also soared during that period.

The reasons behind this are complex and not fully understood. One theory is that heroin became more popular when prescription opioids became harder to obtain and abuse. According to a study by the RAND Corporation, the introduction of abuse-deterrent OxyContin in 2010 was a major driver in the shift to heroin.

Heroin use is also strongly associated with mental illness and childhood trauma. Studies have found that 75 percent of people with heroin addiction have another mental illness, with about half showing signs of psychiatric problems or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) before age 16. At least half were abused or neglected as children, with especially high rates of sexual abuse.

In addition, it is well established in psychiatry that certain mental health disorders – such as borderline personality and bipolar disorder -- have a significantly increased risk of substance use.

Thus, heroin use and addiction is far more complex than just a result of opioid misprespcribing. Most people placed on opioid therapy do not misuse their medication, and the few who do become addicted rarely transition to heroin. Recent studies also suggest that more people are starting on heroin without prior exposure to other opioids.

Heroin addiction is most often the tragic outcome of a shattered childhood or mental illness, and not simply a result of medication exposure. To claim that heroin addiction stems largely from pain management is a disservice to both addicts and pain patients, and will only further the suffering of both groups by diverting attention from the real issues.

Roger Chriss lives with Ehlers Danlos syndrome and is a proud member of the Ehlers-Danlos Society. Roger is a technical consultant in Washington state, where he specializes in mathematics and research.

The information in this column should not be considered as professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. It is for informational purposes only and represents the author’s opinions alone. It does not inherently express or reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Pain News Network.

3 Reasons the Opioid Crisis is Getting Worse

By Roger Chriss, Columnist

The opioid crisis is now a public health emergency. The CDC reports increasing rates of fentanyl overdoses.  And The Economist warns the crisis is entering “a new and deadlier phase.”

The strategy to stop the overdose epidemic has largely focused on the supply side: limiting access to prescription opioids. History seems to support this idea. Two hundred years ago, a tincture of opium called laudanum was widely used to treat all kinds of ailments.  The “epidemic of laudanum” didn’t end until 1906, when the federal government got involved and started regulating opium-based medications.

So it seemed natural to curtail opioid prescribing. Washington State issued prescription opioid guidelines in 2010, Oregon in 2012, and the CDC in 2016. Other states followed with laws limiting the number of days opioids could be prescribed for short term, acute pain. Health insurers like Kaiser Permanente and Intermountain Healthcare have also reduced coverage of prescription opioids and drug store chains like CVS will be limiting prescription length and dose. 

In a narrow sense, this is working. Prescription opioid levels peaked in 2010, as a result of lower production quotas mandated by the DEA and reduced prescribing in a variety of clinical settings.

But in a broader sense, the focus on prescription opioid levels is failing. Opioid addiction and overdose rates continue to climb, despite the reduced availability of prescription opioids. There are three reasons for this.

First, the main drivers in the crisis are now heroin and illicit fentanyl. Importantly, heroin is increasingly the first opioid of abuse.

“As the most commonly prescribed opioids - hydrocodone and oxycodone - became less accessible due to supply-side interventions, the use of heroin as an initiating opioid has grown at an alarming rate,” researchers recently reported in the journal of Addictive Behaviors.

Second, according to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, approximately 75% of all opioid misuse starts with people taking medication that was not prescribed to them. These pills are sourced from friends, stolen from other people’s prescription bottles, or purchased online illegally.

Contrary to common belief, opioid therapy for chronic pain conditions rarely leads to misuse or addiction. Most addictive behaviors start during adolescence, usually with substances like alcohol or tobacco, long before anyone gets their hands on opioid medication.

Third, nearly 10% of drug overdoses are intentional.

"Hidden behind the terrible epidemic of opioid overdose deaths looms the fact that many of these deaths are far from accidental. They are suicides,” wrote Dr. Maria Oquendo, President of the American Psychiatric Association, in a blog for the National Institute on Drug Abuse.

In other words, the crisis may have started with prescription opioids, but it has evolved. We are now facing a crisis driven primarily by heroin, illicit fentanyl, and other street drugs, as well as social and economic conditions that have led to an "epidemic of despair."

Therefore, the current intense focus on prescription opioids -- from the CDC’s Rx Awareness campaign to the recommendations of the President Trump’s opioid commission -- is woefully off target. Reducing access to prescription opioids has not decreased addiction and overdose rates, and may actually be making them worse.

Exactly what will be required to end the crisis is not clear. But an essential step is to understand the nature of the crisis as it stands today so as to end the opioid disconnect.

Roger Chriss lives with Ehlers Danlos syndrome and is a proud member of the Ehlers-Danlos Society.

Roger is a technical consultant in Washington state, where he specializes in mathematics and research.

The information in this column should not be considered as professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. It is for informational purposes only and represents the author’s opinions alone. It does not inherently express or reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Pain News Network.

A Pained Life: Too Many Pain Pills

By Carol Levy, Columnist

I have a confession to make. I watch a number of the court TV shows. Sometimes they can actually teach me something, sometimes they are laughable. Sometimes they are cringe worthy. Sometimes they are simply infuriating.

The judge on one show uses his program as a platform to vilify “pain pills.”

A plaintiff or defendant is invited to tell their story. More often than not, it is a hard luck story. Within a few minutes, many of them blame much of their life struggles on substance abuse problems. Sometimes it is a happier story. They have kicked their drug addiction.

Either way, the judge is curious. “How did you get started using these drugs?” he asks.

The most common answer is that they had a bad back, toothache, neck pain, etc.

“I started to take pain medication for it, and next thing I knew I was addicted and my life spiraled out of control,” they often say.

The judge nods sagaciously and pronounces his sentence on opioids: “Oh yes. It is easy to get addicted to them.”

Never mentioned, and I do understand the issue of time and editing, is the benefit of these medications for those in legitimate pain. Or that those with chronic pain rarely become addicted to them. Instead, the false narrative continues to stand: Pain pills are given for specious reasons and quickly lead to addiction.

Also omitted is the question: “Where do these pills come from?”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention states: “Since 1999, the amount of prescription opioids sold in the U.S. nearly quadrupled, yet there has not been an overall change in the amount of pain that Americans report.“

The CDC reported last week that 17,536 Americans died in 2015 from overdoses of prescription pain medication, a 4 percent increase from the year before.

Patients don't write these prescriptions, yet the CDC’s opioid guidelines and other government regulations seem intended to punish them. As a result, we need to go to the doctor more often. That means more money, more trips, and more waiting. As I write that, I can see folks without pain saying, “So what?”

The “what” is that having to make these extra trips usually translates into more pain, which may necessitate taking even more pain meds. The guidelines meant to “help” may actually increase the need for opioids.

But the CDC itself has let on where the problem lies.

It is not with the patient. It is with the doctors and prescribers who give out these prescriptions like candy. A dentist giving a 30-day supply for a tooth extraction, or a primary care doctor prescribing narcotics to a patient with lower back pain or other issues that could well respond to physical therapy, aspirin, and changing their behavior.  They are the culprits.

The source of the problem is clear. Too many prescriptions are being written by too many doctors.

The CDC guidelines let them off the hook. And puts the patient on it.

Carol Jay Levy has lived with trigeminal neuralgia, a chronic facial pain disorder, for over 30 years. She is the author of “A Pained Life, A Chronic Pain Journey.” 

Carol is the moderator of the Facebook support group “Women in Pain Awareness.” Her blog “The Pained Life” can be found here.

The information in this column should not be considered as professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. It is for informational purposes only and represent the author’s opinions alone. It does not inherently express or reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Pain News Network.