My Story: Hospitals Are Undertreating Pain

By Michael Swift, Guest Columnist

Right now, as I type this, I can barely finish because I just got home from a surgery in my abdominal area. I won't get into the details, but a lot of cutting was done, and I was discharged after an agonizing hospital stay. I was given Tylenol and Naproxen for post-surgical pain.

I am now reclined in bed at home and suffering from post-op pain because a major hospital in a city of a quarter million people is undertreating pain. This is the new norm for most hospitals here in Texas.

My wife and I lived in beautiful central Oregon all our lives. We ended up vacating the house we rented and could find no place to live in the entire state that was affordable to us. For family reasons, we moved to the Texas Panhandle.

My wife, seeking a new pain specialist in Amarillo, was denied and bawled-out two times by doctors. She was told by one verbatim: “We don't push dope here. If you want drugs, go to the north side of town."

I almost walked back in after she told me what this doctor had said to her, to punch him in the mouth. But it would do no good trying to help her from a jail cell. She was visibly upset, in tears, humiliated and so hurt. She is a 67-year-old senior with spinal stenosis and a bone disease that is destroying her vertebral column. Even with stellar remarks by her former providers as a "model patient with legitimate pain,” she was still an object for these millennial brats to verbally spit upon.

When living back in Oregon, my wife and I had a wonderful provider in Bend and our lives were fully active. We failed however to do our homework before moving to Texas. When we arrived, we realized that the Texas Medical Board and certain medical groups and doctors decided they wanted to solve the huge drug abuse problem.

The real problem here has been massive amounts of illicit fentanyl, comprising about 75% of overdose deaths, along with heroin, ecstasy and many other street drugs pushed in by the Sinaloa drug cartel. Nevertheless, the medical board went after the doctors and patients because it was easier than addressing the real problem.

A Broken Healthcare System

To say the least, I am saddened, upset and feeling a huge weight of condemnation from individuals here in the medical field. What a broken and detached healthcare system.

We are both leaving Texas for a nearby state, already set up with a new provider there, who is willing to take a good look at her without judgement. I am not leaving though, until I file a complaint against both pain management providers for their unethical, cruel treatment and libelous slander -- with the use of profanity to my wife's face -- all confirmed by the nurse in the exam room.

I will also file a complaint with the Texas Medical Board for the experience I had as a surgery patient. It will fall on deaf ears, but I won't stop until I get a response. To those of you out there who are also suffering and abandoned, take any and EVERY measure available to control your pain, which is robbing you of your life. You have no other choice.

There is a terrible and frightening experience awaiting those who are destined to go under the knife in hospitals that have overreacted to the "opioid crisis” by implementing a new policy of completely abstaining from administering any narcotic pain medication to post-surgical patients.

I suppose I could have screamed at the top of my lungs to demand pain relief, but who wants that on their record. Or worse, to be blacklisted. Thank God I have an alternate source of pain relief, but I am still astounded.

I am a veteran of nine prior surgeries, all of them done over 20 years ago. When I was in the hospital after those surgeries, I was asked by a nurse what narcotic I wanted to choose for pain relief. After that, I stayed healthy, avoided more surgeries and interpreted the many stories I heard about "Tylenol for post-op pain" as nothing but false tales and fear-mongering.

To all and any of you who posted such statements, I sincerely apologize. You were telling the truth.

Michael Swift lives with degenerative disc disease, arthritis and severe migraines.

Do you have a “My Story” to share? Pain News Network invites other readers to share their experiences about living with pain and treating it.

Send your stories to editor@painnewsnetwork.org

Gabapentin Raises Risk of Delirium in Older Surgery Patients

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

It’s become trendy in recent years for U.S. hospitals to use gabapentin (Neurontin) as a “safer” alternative to opioids for post-operative pain.  But a large new study has found that gabapentin increases the risk of delirium and other adverse health effects in older patients recovering from surgery.

The study, published in JAMA Internal Medicine, looked at nearly a million patients over the age of 65 who had major surgical procedures, including cardiac, orthopedic and gastrointestinal surgeries. About 12% of the patients received gabapentin and other analgesics for perioperative pain management between the day of surgery and two days after surgery.

Researchers found that gabapentin “modestly increased” the risk of delirium, a mental state in which a person becomes confused, disoriented and unable to think or remember clearly. Patients who received gabapentin were also more likely to be prescribed antidepressants and other anti-psychotic drugs, and to develop pneumonia.

“Considering the increasing number of major surgeries performed in older adults, and the negative consequences of perioperative delirium, our findings raise concern about an increasingly adopted clinical practice that involves routine use of gabapentin as part of multimodal analgesia,” wrote lead author Dae Hyun Kim, MD, a geriatrician and epidemiologist at Brigham and Women's Hospital and Assistant Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School.

“On the basis of these findings and those of meta-analyses of RCTs (randomized controlled trials) showing a weak opioid-sparing effect of gabapentin, clinicians should reconsider routine use of gabapentin for perioperative pain management among older adults and individualize the treatment decision after assessing the risk of immediate harms vs opioid-sparing benefits of perioperative gabapentin use.”

‘Windfall Medication’

Although gabapentin is an anti-convulsant that was originally developed to treat epilepsy, it is increasingly prescribed “off-label” to treat various types of pain. In 2016, the American Pain Society recommended that gabapentin be used “around the clock” for post-operative pain because it lowered pain scores and reduced the use of opioids. But studies later found the drug was ineffective for post-operative pain and actually increased the risk of an overdose.

An editorial published in JAMA Internal Medicine said the new study demonstrates that the risks of gabapentin outweigh its potential benefits in older patients.

“These results are consistent with what is now a growing body of literature suggesting that gabapentin may not be the windfall medication for perioperative pain management that surgeons hoped it might be for decreasing opioid use. The adverse events reported in this study (delirium, antipsychotic use, and pneumonia) add to similar findings that gabapentin, especially when used concomitantly with opioids, increases the risk of postoperative sedation and dizziness,” wrote lead author Zachary Marcum, PharmD, University of Washington School of Pharmacy.  

“As the use of gabapentin continues to rise, it is critically important clinicians understand its risks, especially for older adults. Poorly controlled postoperative pain is associated with several complications, including cognitive impairment, delirium, depression, decreased mobility, and longer recovery.”

It’s a common misconception that patients often become addicted to opioids after surgery. A 2016 Canadian study found that long term opioid use after surgery is rare, with only 0.4% of older adults still taking opioids a year after major elective surgery. A 2018 study at Harvard Medical School had similar findings. Only 0.6% of patients who were prescribed opioids for post-operative pain were later diagnosed with opioid dependence, abuse or a non-fatal overdose.

Supreme Court Ruling Gives Hope to Doctors Facing Opioid Charges

By Brett Kelman, Kaiser Health News

Dr. Nelson Onaro conceded last summer that he’d written prescriptions illegally, although he said he was thinking only of his patients. From a tiny, brick clinic in Oklahoma, he doled out hundreds of opioid pills and dozens of fentanyl patches in a way that was "outside the usual course of professional practice."

“Those medications were prescribed to help my patients, from my own point of view,” Onaro said in court, as he reluctantly pleaded guilty to six counts of drug dealing. Because he confessed, the doctor was likely to get a reduced sentence of three years or less in prison.

But Onaro changed his mind in July. In the days before his sentencing, he asked a federal judge to throw out his plea deal, sending his case toward a trial. For a chance at exoneration, he’d face four times the charges and the possibility of a harsher sentence.

Why take the risk? A Supreme Court ruling has raised the bar to convict in a case like Onaro’s. In a June decision, the court said prosecutors must not only prove a prescription was not medically justified ― possibly because it was too large or dangerous, or simply unnecessary ― but also that the prescriber knew as much.

Suddenly, Onaro’s state of mind carries more weight in court. Prosecutors have not opposed the doctor withdrawing his plea to most of his charges, conceding in a court filing that he faces “a different legal calculus” after the Supreme Court decision.

The court’s unanimous ruling complicates the Department of Justice’s ongoing efforts to hold prescribers criminally liable for fueling the opioid crisis. Previously, lower courts had not considered a prescriber’s intention. Until now, doctors on trial largely could not defend themselves by arguing they were acting in good faith when they wrote bad prescriptions. Now they can, attorneys say, although it is not necessarily a get-out-of-jail-free card.

“Essentially, the doctors were handcuffed,” said Zach Enlow, Onaro’s attorney. “Now they can take off their handcuffs. But it doesn’t mean they are going to win the fight.”

The Supreme Court’s decision in Ruan v. United States, issued June 27, was overshadowed by the nation-shaking controversy ignited three days earlier, when the court erased federal abortion rights. But the lesser-known ruling is now quietly percolating through federal courthouses, where it has emboldened defendants in opioid prescribing cases and may have a chilling effect on future prosecutions of doctors under the Controlled Substances Act.

In the three months since it was issued, the Ruan decision has been invoked in at least 15 ongoing prosecutions across 10 states, according to a KHN review of federal court records. Doctors cited the decision in post-conviction appeals, motions for acquittals, new trials, plea reversals, and a failed attempt to exclude the testimony of a prescribing expert, arguing their opinion was now irrelevant. Other defendants have successfully petitioned to delay their cases so the Ruan decision could be folded into their arguments at upcoming trials or sentencing hearings.

David Rivera, a former Obama-era U.S. attorney who once led prescribing prosecutions in Middle Tennessee, said he believes doctors have a “great chance” of overturning convictions if they were prohibited from arguing a good faith defense or a jury was instructed to ignore one.

Rivera said defendants who ran true pill mills would still be convicted, even if a second trial was ultimately required. But the Supreme Court has extended a “lifeline” to a narrow group of defendants who “dispensed with their heart, not their mind,” he said.

“What the Supreme Court is trying to do is divide between a bad doctor and a person who might have a license to practice medicine but is not acting as a doctor at all and is a drug dealer,” Rivera said. “A doctor who is acting under a sincerely held belief that he is doing the right thing, even if he may be horrible at his job and should not be trusted with human lives ― that’s still not criminal.”

The Ruan decision resulted from the appeals of two doctors, Xiulu Ruan and Shakeel Kahn, who were separately convicted of running pill mills in Alabama and Wyoming, respectively, then sentenced to 21 and 25 years in prison. In both cases, prosecutors relied on a common tactic to show the prescriptions were a crime: Expert witnesses reviewed the defendants’ prescriptions and testified that they were far out of line with what a reasonable doctor would do.

But in writing the opinion of the Supreme Court, then-Justice Stephen Breyer insisted the burden of proof should not be so simple to overcome, remanding both convictions back to the lower courts for reconsideration.

Because doctors are allowed and expected to distribute drugs, Breyer wrote, prosecutors must not only prove they wrote prescriptions with no medical purpose but also that they did so “knowingly or intentionally.” Otherwise, the courts risk punishing “conduct that lies close to, but on the permissible side of, the criminal line,” Breyer wrote.

To defense attorneys, the unanimous ruling sent an unambiguous message.

“This is a hyperpolarized time in America, and particularly on the court,” Enlow said. “And yet this was a 9-0 ruling saying that the mens rea ― or the mental state of the doctor ― it matters.”

Maybe nowhere was the Ruan decision more pressing than in the case of Dr. David Jankowski, a Michigan physician who was on trial when the burden of proof shifted beneath his feet.

Jankowski was convicted of federal drug and fraud crimes and faces 20 years in prison. In an announcement of the verdict, the DOJ said the doctor and his clinic supplied people with “no need for the drugs,” which were “sold on the streets to feed the addictions of opioid addicts.”

Defense attorney Anjali Prasad said the Ruan ruling dropped before jury deliberations in the case but after prosecutors spent weeks presenting the argument that Jankowski’s behavior was not that of a reasonable prescriber — a legal standard that on its own is no longer enough to convict.

Prasad cited the Ruan decision in a motion for a new trial, which was denied, and said she intends to use the decision as a basis for a forthcoming appeal. The attorney also said she is in discussion with two other clients about appealing their convictions with Ruan.

“My hope is that criminal defense attorneys like myself are more emboldened to take their cases to trial and that their clients are 100% ready to fight the feds, which is no easy task,” Prasad said. “We just duke it out in the courtroom. We can prevail that way.”

Some defendants are trying. So far, a few have scored small wins. And at least one suffered a crushing defeat.

In Tennessee, nurse practitioner Jeffrey Young, accused of trading opioids for sex and notoriety for a reality show pilot, successfully delayed his trial from May to November to account for the Ruan decision, arguing it would “drastically alter the landscape of the Government’s war on prescribers.”

Also in Tennessee, Samson Orusa, a doctor and pastor who last year was convicted of handing out opioid prescriptions without examining patients, filed a motion for a new trial based on the Ruan decision, then persuaded a reluctant judge to delay his sentencing for six months to consider it.

And in Ohio, Dr. Martin Escobar cited the Ruan ruling in an eleventh-hour effort to avoid prison.

Escobar in January pleaded guilty to 54 counts of distributing a controlled substance, including prescriptions that caused the deaths of two patients. After the Ruan decision, Escobar tried to withdraw his plea, saying he’d have gone to trial if he’d known prosecutors had to prove his intent.

One week later, on the day Escobar was set to be sentenced, a federal judge denied the motion. His guilty plea remained and Escobar got 25 years.

Kaiser Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues.

Opioid Prescriptions Down Sharply for Medicare Patients

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

The number of Medicare beneficiaries receiving opioid prescriptions has declined significantly since 2016, according to a new government report that also found steep declines in the number of beneficiaries receiving high doses or who appear to be doctor shopping.

The report by the Department of Health and Human Service’s Office of Inspector General found that over 21 million people -- 23% of Medicare Part D beneficiaries -- received at least one opioid prescription in 2021, down from 33% of beneficiaries in 2016. Over 51 million people are currently enrolled in Part D.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) adopted new safety rules in 2018 that discourage high dose prescribing and limit the initial supply of opioids to 7 days. The rules also allowed pharmacists and insurers to flag Medicare patients deemed to be at high risk, as well as their prescribers.

The rules appear to have had a major impact on prescribing. In 2016, over half a million Medicare beneficiaries received a daily opioid dose of at least 120 MED (morphine milligram equivalent). By 2021, that fell to less than 200,000 patients, a 60 percent decrease in high dose prescribing.   

MEDICARE PATIENTS RECEIVING HIGH DOSE OPIOIDS

HHS Office of Inspector General

Since 2016, the number of Medicare beneficiaries who appeared to be doctor shopping dropped from 22,300 to 1,800; while the number of doctors with “questionable” prescribing patterns fell from 401 to just 98.  Patients were flagged for doctor shopping if they were on high doses and received opioids from four or more prescribers or four or more pharmacists.

“The opioid epidemic continues to grip the nation. There is clearly still cause for concern and vigilance, even as some positive trends emerge,” the OIG report found. “The number of Medicare Part D beneficiaries who received opioids in 2021 decreased to approximately a quarter of a million beneficiaries, extending a downward trend from prior years. Further, fewer Part D beneficiaries were identified as receiving high amounts of opioids or at serious risk of misuse or overdose. The number of prescribers ordering opioids for large numbers of beneficiaries at serious risk was steady.”

But there is little evidence that less prescribing is reducing addiction and overdoses.  The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates there were nearly 81,000 opioid-related deaths in 2021, nearly twice the number reported in 2016, when the CDC’s opioid guideline was released. The vast majority of deaths involved illicit fentanyl and other street drugs, not prescription opioids.

The OIG report found that 50,391 Part D beneficiaries experienced an opioid overdose (either fatal or non-fatal) in 2021, but did not break down how many were linked to illicit or prescription opioids.

Over one million Medicare beneficiaries were diagnosed with opioid use disorder (OUD) last year, but only one in five received a medication like Suboxone or methadone to treat their condition. Medicare patients were far more likely to receive naloxone, an overdose reversal drug. Over 445,000 beneficiaries received a prescription for naloxone, an 18% increase from 2020.

Older Adults Look Beyond Western Medicine for Help With Joint Pain

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Most older Americans use over-the-counter pain medication and exercise to manage their joint pain, according to a large new survey of adults over age 50. Marijuana, opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were rated the most effective pain relievers among those who used them.

The survey of 2,277 adults aged 50 to 80 was conducted online and over the phone early this year as part of the University of Michigan’s National Poll on Healthy Aging. It found that many older adults looked beyond conventional Western medicine for help with their joint pain, but few talked to their doctors about it.

Eight out of ten people (80%) with joint pain said they were confident they could manage it on their own. The survey found that two-thirds (66%) used over-the-counter pain relievers such as NSAID’s or acetaminophen.

The vast majority (89%) also used non-pharmacologic treatments to manage their symptoms, including exercise (64%), massage (26%), physical therapy (24%), splints or braces (13%), and acupuncture or acupressure (5%).

One in four (26%) said they take supplements, such as glucosamine, chondroitin and turmeric, while 11% use cannabidiol (CBD) products and 9% use marijuana.

Only a minority use prescription-based treatments, such as non-opioid pain relievers (18%), steroid joint injections (19%), oral steroids (14%), opioids (14%) and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (4%).

NATIONAL POLL ON HEALTHY AGING

“There are sizable risks associated with many of these treatment options, especially when taken long-term or in combination with other drugs. Yet 60 percent of those taking two or more substances for their joint pain said their health care provider hadn’t talked with them about risks, or they couldn’t recall if they had,” said Beth Wallace, MD, Assistant Professor of Internal Medicine at Michigan Medicine and a staff rheumatologist at the VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System.

“This suggests a pressing need for providers to talk with their patients about how to manage their joint pain, and what interactions and long-term risks might arise if they use medications to do so.”

Both NSAIDs and oral steroids have health risks, especially for older adults. Chronic NSAID use can worsen medical conditions such as hypertension, kidney disease, gastrointestinal bleeding and cardiovascular disease. Short-term use of oral steroids is associated with similar problems, as well as increased risk of developing diabetes, cataracts, insomnia, depression, and anxiety.

The risks are even greater if NSAIDs and oral steroids are taken together. Despite this, about one in four older adults taking oral steroids for joint pain said they had not discussed the potential risks with their provider.

Joint pain is common among older adults, including those who have not been formally diagnosed with arthritis. Nearly half of those surveyed reported joint pain that limited their daily activities, but few rated their symptoms as severe and most regarded joint pain as a normal part of aging.

Those with severe joint pain were somewhat fatalistic about it, with nearly half (49%) agreeing with the statement that “there is nothing a person with arthritis or joint pain can do to make their symptoms better.” Only 10% of those with mild joint pain agreed there was nothing they could do about it.

“Older adults with fair or poor physical or mental health were much more likely to agree with the statement that there’s nothing that someone with joint pain can do to ease their symptoms, which we now know to be untrue. Health providers need to raise the topic of joint pain with their older patients, and help them make a plan for care that might work for them,” said poll director Preeti Malani, MD, a Michigan Medicine physician who specializes in geriatrics and infectious diseases.

Drug Tests Show Pain Patients on Opioids Less Likely to Use Illicit Drugs

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

In an effort to reduce soaring rates of drug abuse and overdoses, many physicians have taken their pain patients off opioids and switched them to “safer” non-opioid drugs like pregabalin, gabapentin and duloxetine. Others have encouraged their patients to try non-pharmacological treatments, such as acupuncture, massage and meditation.

That strategy may be backfiring, according to a large new study by Millennium Health, which found that pain patients prescribed opioids are significantly less likely to use illicit drugs than pain patients not getting opioids.

The drug testing firm analyzed urine drug samples from 2019 to 2021 for nearly 55,000 patients being treated by U.S. pain management specialists. About 80% of the patients were prescribed an opioid like oxycodone or hydrocodone, while the other 20% were not prescribed opioids.

Millennium researchers say detectable levels of illicit fentanyl, heroin, methamphetamine and cocaine were far more likely to be found in the urine of non-opioid patients than those who were prescribed opioids. For example, illicit fentanyl was detected in 2.21% of the patients not getting an opioid, compared to 1.169% of those who were. The findings were similar for heroin, methamphetamine and cocaine.

“In all cases, we found that the population that was not prescribed an opioid was significantly more likely to be positive for an illicit drug than those patients who were prescribed opioids,” said lead author Penn Whitley, Director of Bioinformatics at Millennium. “(There was) a 40 to 60 percent increase in the likelihood of being positive if you were not prescribed an opioid.”

Illicit Drug Use By Pain Patients

MILLENNIUM HEALTH

What do the findings mean? Are pain patients getting ineffective non-opioid therapies so desperate for relief that they’re turning to illicit drugs? That’s possible, but the study doesn’t address that specifically.

Another possibility is that patients on opioids are simply being more cautious and careful about their drug use. Opioid prescribing in the U.S. has fallen by 48% over the past five years, with many patients being forcibly tapered or abandoned by doctors who feel pressured to reduce their prescribing.  

“Unfortunately, a lot of people with chronic pain have learned that it’s a bit tenuous, that their doctors are feeling pressure, and if they want to maintain their access (to opioids), they need their PDMP (Prescription Drug Monitoring Program) and their drug tests to look the way they need to look, so their doctor can feel comfortable continuing to prescribe,” said co-author Steven Passik, PhD, VP of Scientific Affairs and Head of Clinical Data Programs at Millennium. “I do think they realize that they’re on a treatment and that access to it is not guaranteed.”   

Preliminary findings from the study were released today at PainWeek, an annual conference for pain management providers. The findings mirror those from another Millennium study earlier this year, which found that pain patients have lower rates of illicit drug use than patients being treated by other providers.     

“If your main way of protecting people in pain from getting involved in substance abuse is to limit their access to opioids, there’s at least a hint here that’s not the right approach,” Passik told PNN. “It’s not a definitive statement by any stretch of the imagination, but it’s an approach to patient safety that leaves a bit to be desired.”  

Another recent study at the University of Texas also found that restricting access to opioids is “not a panacea” and may even lead to more overdoses.  Researchers found that in states that mandated PDMP use, opioid prescribing decreased as intended, but heroin overdose deaths rose 50 percent.

“Past research has shown that when facing restricted access to addictive substances, individuals simply seek out alternatives rather than limiting consumption,” said lead author Tongil Kim, PhD, an assistant professor of marketing at University of Texas at Dallas. “In our case, we measured overdose deaths as a proxy and found a substantial increase, suggesting that the policy unintentionally spurred greater substitution.”

DEA Warns of ‘Rainbow Fentanyl’ Targeting Kids

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

At first glance, they look like candy. Brightly-colored tablets in shades of pink, purple, yellow and green. Not unlike a bag of Skittles or a bowl of Fruit Loops.

But they’re not sweet treats. They’re the latest version of “Mexican Oxy” – counterfeit oxycodone pills laced with fentanyl, stamped with an “M” on one side and “30” on the other. Typically blue in color – like authentic oxycodone – the pills increasingly come in a variety of colors, what law enforcement agencies call “rainbow fentanyl.”

In recent weeks, rainbow fentanyl has been found in 18 states, including an August 17 bust at the Arizona border with Mexico, where over 15,000 of the colorful pills were found strapped to a smuggler’s leg.

It was the second consecutive day rainbow fentanyl was intercepted at the port of Nogales, a possible sign that drug cartels are targeting younger users.

“Rainbow fentanyl — fentanyl pills and powder that come in a variety of bright colors, shapes, and sizes — is a deliberate effort by drug traffickers to drive addiction amongst kids and young adults,” DEA Administrator Anne Milgram said in a statement that warns of the “alarming emerging trend.”

HOMELAND SECURITY IMAGE

The DEA says rainbow fentanyl is being seized in multiple forms, including blocks that resemble the chalk a child might use to color a sidewalk. A recent drug raid in Portland, Oregon turned up several powdered blocks of rainbow fentanyl, along with meth, heroin, hundreds of fentanyl pills and a small armory of guns.

“Deputies are particularly concerned about rainbow fentanyl getting into the hands of young adults or children, who mistake the drug for something else, such as candy or a toy, or those who may be willing to try the drug due to its playful coloring. The powdered fentanyl found during this investigation resembles the color and consistency of sidewalk chalk,” the Multnomah County Sheriff’s Office said in a statement.

“We are seeing more powdered fentanyl that is dyed in various colors. The strength can vary but is typically stronger than pressed pills,” said Kelsi Junge, Harm Reduction Supervisor for Multnomah County.

Some colors are believed to be more potent than others, a claim that has not been confirmed by DEA laboratory tests.  

No matter the color or shape, rainbow fentanyl is dangerous. Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid that is 50 times more potent than heroin and 100 times more potent than morphine. Just two milligrams of fentanyl, similar in size to 10-15 grains of salt, is considered a lethal dose. 

Because illicit fentanyl is cooked up in makeshift laboratories by amateur chemists, the potency of the pills or powder varies considerably.

MULTNOMAH COUNTY SHERIFF

The DEA says most of the illicit fentanyl in the United States is supplied by two Mexican drug cartels, the Sinaloa and Jalisco New Generation cartels, although there is no shortage of Americans willing to transport the drugs or turn them into tablets with pill presses.

“The men and women of the DEA are relentlessly working to stop the trafficking of rainbow fentanyl and defeat the Mexican drug cartels that are responsible for the vast majority of the fentanyl that is being trafficked in the United States,” said Milgram.

Fentanyl is a potent analgesic that is prescribed legally for severe pain, but it is illicit fentanyl and its analogues that are responsible for the vast majority of drug deaths. According to the CDC, over 107,000 Americans died of drug overdoses in 2021, with two-thirds of the deaths linked to fentanyl.

FDA Conducting Review of Opioid Regulations

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has launched an extensive review of its opioid regulations, with the goal of reducing overdoses and making revisions “to support appropriate use of opioid analgesics.”

In a blog post, FDA commissioner Robert Califf, MD, acknowledged the overdose crisis has “evolved beyond prescription opioids” and is now largely driven by illicit fentanyl and other street drugs. But he was vague about whether FDA would loosen restrictions on opioid pain medication or tighten them further.

“While the FDA’s previous strategies have largely focused on opioid use and overdoses, the evolving nature of the overdose crisis calls for both a new approach and honest reflection about what the FDA can do differently moving forward,” Califf said. “For example, during my confirmation process, I committed to undertaking a review of our opioid decisions, including labeling. We have initiated this review with the intended goal of understanding what revisions are needed to support appropriate use of opioid analgesics. Our ‘lessons learned’ will actively inform our future approach.”

One of the lessons learned by the CDC over the past few years is that rigid opioid prescribing guidelines have been harmful to patients and need to be “individualized and flexible.” The agency is currently in the process of revising its 2016 opioid guideline, with the goal of releasing an updated guideline late this year.

It’s not clear if the FDA is moving in a similar direction. One of the priorities for the agency’s new Overdose Prevention Framework is to “improve pain management and patient outcomes” – not by making opioids more accessible, but by reducing “unnecessary initial prescription drug exposure and inappropriate prolonged prescribing.” 

Califf said the agency was studying the need for mandatory prescriber education about opioids, including a national continuing education program about the use of opioids to manage pain. Most medical schools in the U.S. and Canada do not require a course in pain education and few even offer pain management as an elective.

The FDA may also tighten the rules for getting new opioids approved, including a requirement that drug makers demonstrate that their products offer material safety advantages over existing opioid analgesics. At the same time, the agency is planning to release new guidance to speed up the development of non-opioid and non-addictive treatments for chronic pain.

This is the 70-year old Califf’s second stint as FDA commissioner, having previously served in that role during the Obama administration. He was confirmed for a second time by the U.S. Senate last December by a narrow 50 to 46 vote. At the time, he promised an extensive review of the FDA’s opioid regulations to counteract complaints that the agency did little to prevent opioid misuse and was too accommodating to drug makers.

Federal efforts to reduce drug overdoses by limiting opioid prescriptions have largely failed. While opioid prescribing has fallen by 48% over the past five years, overdoses soared to a record 107,000 drug deaths in 2021, driven primarily by illicit fentanyl.

A recent study found no “direct correlation” between opioid prescribing and overdoses. Another analysis of overdose deaths in 2020 found that prescription opioids ranked well behind illicit fentanyl, alcohol, cocaine, methamphetamine and heroin as the leading cause of drug deaths.   

Raising Lazarus: Another Take on the Opioid Crisis

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Beth Macy’s bestselling book “Dopesick” – and the Hulu series based on it -- helped shape the popular narrative on the origins of the opioid crisis: that Purdue Pharma and the Sackler family duped physicians into prescribing highly addictive OxyContin to millions of pain patients, setting off a public health and overdose crisis that continues to this day.

Macy’s new book “Raising Lazarus” focuses on many of the same themes, but with an important new addition. She recognizes that opioid hysteria and fear of addiction went too far, depriving many people in pain of the medications they need to lead functional and productive lives.

“In recent years, law enforcement agencies, the CDC, and other medical authorities had overreacted to the first wave of the opioid crisis by clamping down too hard on opioid-prescribing,” Macy wrote. “Some doctors responded to the revised 2016 CDC opioid-prescribing guideline – and their fear of DEA prosecution – by declaring draconian caps and essentially abandoning their patients.

“People who needed opioids were refused access. Others with decades-long chronic conditions like extreme rheumatoid arthritis were abandoned by doctors and were now left bedbound. Some who were denied the opioids they’d been taking for decades attempted suicide or resorted to illegal drugs.”  

Those are welcome words from a noted critic of opioid “overprescribing.” But that passage – which is buried halfway through a 373-page book – doesn’t represent what Raising Lazarus is all about. Macy’s new book primarily deals with Purdue’s corporate greed and the ongoing struggles of working-class people in Appalachia to overcome addiction and a healthcare system that simply doesn’t work for them.

Macy is a bit defensive and resorts to gaslighting when she acknowledges past criticism from pain patients for Dopesick “drawing too much attention to overprescribed opioid pills.” Many of their complaints are valid, she admits, “if sometimes over-the-top and oblivious to the root causes of the crisis.”

Interestingly, Macy never actually quotes one of those “over-the-top” pain patients in Raising Lazarus, but she did interview Stanford pain psychologist Dr. Beth Darnall about the reluctance of doctors to prescribe opioids.

“Doctors are so concerned about being flagged, concerned about their license and their livelihood, they don’t want to take (chronic pain patients) on, and so you end up with patient abandonment, and iatrogenic harms that can create a medically dangerous situation,” Darnall told Macy.    

‘The Cruel World of Purdue Pharma’

Greed, no doubt, is one of the primary causes of the opioid crisis and Macy describes in detail how the Sacklers manipulated the political and legal system, paying their chief counsel the handsome rate of $1,790 an hour to gum things up as best he could to preserve the family fortune and prevent them from going to prison.

But she gives a free pass to others who have profited from the opioid crisis, often at the expense of pain patients, most notably the private plaintiff law firms suing drug makers on behalf of cities, counties and states.

Macy credits the late attorney Paul Hanly as being “the first to crack open the cruel world of Purdue Pharma” without pointing out that his law firm, Simmons Hanly Conroy, boasts that it “effectively invented large-scale, multi-defendant opioid litigation” and stands to make billions of dollars in contingency fees from settlement money.  

Also unmentioned is the $400,000 in campaign donations given by Simmons Hanly Conroy to former Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) in 2018, who conveniently produced a well-publicized report that year critical of drug makers and medical pain societies that the law firm was suing. Overwhelmed with legal fees defending themselves, two of those pain societies filed for bankruptcy, a loss that pain management specialists, researchers and patients could ill afford.

Macy does quote anti-opioid activists like Dr. Andrew Kolodny and Dr. Anna Lembke, but doesn’t mention that they testified as paid expert witnesses for Hanly and other plaintiff law firms, making well into six figures for their testimony, which they often failed to disclose in conflict of interest statements.  

“The opioid-litigation money is a once-in-a-generation opportunity,” Macy writes, with unintended irony.

Macy is hopeful the settlement money – once estimated at $50 billion -- will go towards addiction treatment and better healthcare for communities ravaged by the opioid crisis. Unfortunately, much of it has already been spent on legal fees, media and public relations campaigns, and political donations. That’s not counting shady industries that have grown and prospered due to the opioid crisis; from drug testing and stem cell providers to cannabis promoters and drug cartels.  

Even though fentanyl and other street drugs are responsible for the vast majority of overdoses, Macy still clings to the tired notion that opioid pain medication started it all.

“A quarter century into the crisis, many people with OUD (opioid use disorder) have long since transitioned from painkillers to heroin, methamphetamine, and fentanyl, the ultra-potent synthetic opioid. And we now have a generation of drug users that started with heroin and fentanyl,” she writes. “Death by drugs is now a national problem, but the crisis began as an epidemic of overprescribed painkillers in the distressed communities that were least likely to muster the resources to fight back.”

I look forward to Macy’s next book and hope that she hears more from the distressed community of pain patients. They need a champion to fight for them too, not more gaslighting.

Misuse of Rx Opioids by Young Adults Falls to Record Lows

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

The misuse of prescription opioids by young adults has fallen to the lowest levels ever recorded, according to an annual survey that’s been tracking drug use in the U.S. since 1975. The Monitoring the Future (MTF) survey also found that use of marijuana and hallucinogens by young adults rose to an all-time high last year.

The MTF survey and annual report is a joint project of the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and the University of Michigan. Over 28,000 people were surveyed last year, including young adults aged 19 to 30 and adults aged 35 to 60.

Only 1.7% of young adults reported using “narcotics other than heroin,” a poorly named category that refers to the non-medical use of prescription opioids such as hydrocodone and oxycodone. Misuse of prescription opioids has been in a steep decline since reaching a peak of 8.9% in 2006.

NON-MEDICAL USE OF Rx OPIOIDS BY YOUNG ADULTS AGED 19-30

Source: Monitoring the Future

“One of the best ways we can learn more about drug use and its impact on people is to observe which drugs are appearing, in which populations, for how long and under which contexts,” said Megan Patrick, PhD, a research professor and principal investigator of the MTF study. 

“Monitoring the Future and similar large-scale surveys on a consistent sample population allow us to assess the effects of ‘natural experiments’ like the pandemic. We can examine how and why drugs are used and highlight critical areas to guide where the research should go next and to inform public health interventions.”

The MTF survey reflects the declining role that prescription opioids have in the U.S. drug epidemic, which is primarily fueled by illicit fentanyl and other street drugs. According to the IQVIA Institute, a healthcare data tracking firm, prescription opioid use has fallen by 48% over the past five years and now stands at levels last seen in 2000.

Once the most widely prescribed drug in the United States, hydrocodone (Vicodin) prescriptions have plummeted since the opioid was reclassified as a Schedule II Controlled Substance in 2014 and became harder to obtain.

According to the MTF survey, only 1.3% of young adults reported using Vicodin last year, down from a peak of 9.2% in 2009.

VICODIN USE BY YOUNG ADULTS AGED 19-30

Source: Monitoring the Future

Marijuana and Hallucinogens

While fewer younger adults are misusing prescription opioids, they are using marijuana and hallucinogens far more often.

Daily marijuana use (use on 20 or more occasions in the past 30 days) in 2021 reached the highest levels ever recorded since the MTF survey started monitoring it in 1988. Daily marijuana use was reported by 11% of young adults last year, up from 8% in 2016 and 6% in 2011.

In 2021, 8% of young adults reported using a hallucinogen such as LSD, ecstasy or psilocybin, an all-time high since the category was first surveyed in 1988. By comparison, only 3% reported using hallucinogens a decade earlier.

“As the drug landscape shifts over time, this data provides a window into the substances and patterns of use favored by young adults. We need to know more about how young adults are using drugs like marijuana and hallucinogens, and the health effects that result from consuming different potencies and forms of these substances,” NIDA Director Nora Volkow, MD, said in a news release.

“Young adults are in a critical life stage and honing their ability to make informed choices. Understanding how substance use can impact the formative choices in young adulthood is critical to help position the new generations for success.”

Alcohol remains the most-used substance among young adults, by far, with nearly 82% reporting alcohol use last year, unchanged from 2020. However, binge drinking (five or more drinks) rebounded to 32% in 2021 from an historic low in 2020, during the early stages of COVID-19 pandemic. 

Fewer Opioids and Weaker Doses for Cancer Patients

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Another study has documented how opioid guidelines over the past decade have led to fewer and weaker opioid prescriptions for cancer patients --- even though the treatment guidelines typically state they are not intended for patients suffering from cancer pain.

In findings recently published in PLOS ONE, researchers at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the University of Michigan analyzed pharmacy claims for up to 53 million privately insured U.S. adults from 2012 to 2019. During that period, opioid prescribing fell from 49.7% to 30.5% for people with chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) and from 86% to 78.7% for people with cancer.

While the drop in prescribing appears minor for cancer patients, a closer look at the numbers shows a significant decline in high dose prescriptions and in the number of days opioids were prescribed.

In 2012, for example, the average daily dose for a cancer patient was 62.4 morphine milligram equivalents (MME). By 2019, that had fallen to 44.7 MME – a decline of over 28 percent.

The percentage of cancer patients getting over 90 MME — a ceiling recommended by the CDC for chronic non-cancer pain — fell from 26.2% to just 7.6% -- a 71 percent decrease.

The average number of days per year a cancer patient received opioids also fell, from 34.8 days to 22.3 days – a 36 percent decline.

“While clinical guidelines continue to endorse prescription opioid treatment for cancer-related pain, declines in receipt of any opioid prescription were observed for people with cancer diagnoses, though these declines were smaller in magnitude than those observed among people with CNCP diagnoses. Future research is needed to understand the clinical implications of this decline, as well as observed decreases in MME/day and days’ supply of opioid prescriptions, among cancer patients,” researchers reported.

In short, cancer patients are getting smaller and fewer doses of opioids, which researchers admit could be making their cancer pain worse. However, they stopped short of sounding the alarm over that trend and suggest it could be beneficial – by helping to reduce the risk of cancer patients overdosing.  

“On the one hand, this finding may signal a cooling effect on opioid prescribing that could contribute to poorly controlled cancer pain. On the other hand, this finding may suggest reductions in high-risk opioid prescribing practices, such as high dosage prescribing, which are shown to contribute to increased risk of opioid overdose death among cancer patients,” they wrote.

Oncology experts have been warning for years that opioid prescribing guidelines are being misapplied to cancer patients, even to women with advanced breast cancer.

In 2019, a Rite Aid pharmacist refused to fill an opioid prescription for April Doyle, a California woman with Stage 4 terminal breast cancer.  A tearful video she posted online went viral and the pharmacy apologized to Doyle, who later died.

That same year, the Cancer Action Network warned there has been “a significant increase in cancer patients and survivors being unable to access their opioid prescriptions.” One out of four said a pharmacy had refused to fill their prescriptions and nearly a third reported their insurer refused to pay them.

Part of the confusion about what’s appropriate for cancer pain is that the CDC’s opioid guideline says the recommendations are intended for patients “who have completed cancer treatment, are in clinical remission, and are under cancer surveillance only.”  Experts say the inclusion of cancer survivors is a mistake because it is not uncommon for pain to persist long after the cancer is treated or even because of the treatment itself.  

A revised draft version of the CDC guideline attempts to clear up some of the confusion by explicitly stating the recommendations are not intended for patients undergoing “cancer pain treatment” and for those in palliative or end-of-life care. The updated version of the CDC guideline is expected to be published late this year.

Should Gabapentin Be Used for Dental Pain?

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Since it was first approved as an anti-seizure medication in the 1990’s, gabapentin (Neurontin) has become one of the most widely studied and prescribed drugs in world.  Although gabapentin is only approved by the FDA for epilepsy and postherpetic neuralgia (shingles), it is widely prescribed off-label for fibromyalgia, neuropathy and many other types of pain.

Hundreds of clinical trials have been conducted to find new uses for gabapentin -- for everything from asthma and obesity to alcoholism and improving your sex life. Gabapentin has been pitched for so many different conditions that a drug company executive infamously called it “snake oil.”

Now gabapentin is being touted as a “promising alternative” to opioids for dental pain. In a new study at the University of Rochester Medical Center’s Eastman Institute for Oral Health (EIOH), researchers found that gabapentin, when combined with ibuprofen or acetaminophen, was more effective than opioids in relieving pain after tooth extractions.  

“We hypothesized that using a combination of the non-opioid pain medications and adding gabapentin to the mix for pain would be an effective strategy to minimize or eliminate opioids for dental pain,” said Yanfang Ren, DDS, a dentistry professor at EIOH.   

Ren and his colleagues treated over 7,000 patients at an urgent dental care clinic with different combinations of opioids, ibuprofen, acetaminophen and gabapentin after tooth extractions. The “failure rates” of the medications were determined by how often patients returned to the clinic for additional pain relief.

The study findings, published in JAMA Network Open, found that non-opioid medications, including those with gabapentin, had failure rates significantly lower than opioids.      

Dental Pain Failure Rates

• 0.9% Acetaminophen/ibuprofen

• 3.4% Gabapentin/acetaminophen

• 5.3% Gabapentin/ibuprofen

• 9.2% Codeine/acetaminophen

• 19.4% Hydrocodone/acetaminophen

• 31.3% Other opioid combinations

Providers at the dental clinic have already put their findings into practice by sharply reducing the use of opioids. Prior to that, about 1,800 patients at the clinic were treated each year with opioids. Researchers estimate the reduced opioid prescribing may have prevented 105 of those patients from developing a problem with “persistent opioid use.”

“This study represents continued efforts by our team and other dentists to minimize the use of opioids for dental pain,” said Eli Eliav, DMD, the director of EIOH. “Additional studies, preferably randomized controlled clinical trials, are needed to confirm the safety and effectiveness of this approach. It is our duty to continuously seek safe and effective treatment for our patients in pain.”

Gabapentin has issues of its own. Patients prescribed gabapentin often complain of mood swings, depression, dizziness, fatigue and drowsiness, and a 2019 review found little evidence gabapentin should be used off-label to treat pain. There are also many reports that gabapentin is being abused and sold on the streets because it can heighten the effects of other drugs.

Evidence Used to Justify CDC Opioid Guideline ‘No Longer Present’

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Anti-opioid activists and public health officials have long argued that opioid “overprescribing” fueled the overdose crisis in the United States, causing drug deaths to surge to record levels.

“This rise is directly correlated with increased prescribing for chronic pain,” Dr. Jane Ballantyne, then-president of Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing (PROP), wrote in a 2015 letter to the National Institutes of Health.

That claim was repeated the following year by the CDC when the agency released its controversial opioid guideline. “Overprescribing opioids – largely for chronic pain – is a key driver of America’s drug overdose epidemic,” then-CDC director Dr. Thomas Frieden said in a news release.   

But a new analysis debunks the overprescribing myth, finding the “direct correlations” cited by Frieden, Ballantyne and others are no longer valid, if they ever were.

In a study recently published in Frontiers of Pain Research, independent researchers Larry Aubry and B. Thomas Carr examined opioid prescribing trends and overdose deaths from 2010 to 2019, using the same data sources that the CDC guideline is based on.

“The direct correlations used to justify the CDC guideline… are no longer present,” they reported.

Aubry and Carr found that opioid prescribing, when measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MME), was in steep decline years before the guideline was even released. That trend accelerated even further when regulators, insurers and healthcare providers started following the CDC’s recommendations.

If the overprescribing theory were true, you would expect drug deaths to go down as opioid sales did. But in subsequent years, overdoses linked to prescription opioids stayed flat and drug deaths surged even higher. In research terms, that is known as a “negative correlation” -- a trend not supported by facts.

Looking at data from all 50 states, Aubry and Carr found “significant negative correlation” in 38 states between overdoses and prescription opioids, and a positive correlation in only 2 states. In 10 states, there appeared to be no relationship at all. That calls into question ones of the primary recommendations of the CDC guideline; that daily opioid doses not exceed 90 MME.

“This recommendation is not supported by the available data. Regression analyses of (total opioid deaths, opioid overdose deaths, opioid treatment admissions, and prescription opioid sales) among patients receiving doses of at least 90 MME/day show significant negative relationships, indicating that lower (prescription opioid sales) in this high-dosage cohort do not correspond to lower death rates,” Aubry and Carr reported.

The CDC estimates that over 107,000 people died of overdoses in 2021, well above the 63,600 drug deaths reported in 2016, the year the guideline was released.

Negative Correlation Between Overdoses and Opioid Prescribing

sOURCE: FRONTIERS OF PAIN RESEARCH

Patient Outcomes Not Being Monitored

Even more concerning is that the CDC does not appear to be tracking the impact of its 2016 guideline on pain patients, even as it prepares a long-delayed update to the guideline. As PNN has reported, the CDC ignored warnings from its own consultants that the agency “should consider conducting more research” on patients, many of whom were abruptly tapered or abandoned by their doctors after the guideline’s release.

“Reasonable judgment would dictate tracking and reporting of chronic pain patient outcomes (deaths, suicides, returns in benefits, reported pain, function, etc.) for individuals since the guideline or the guideline update. However, there appears to be no publicly available evidence that a monitoring process is required or is planned to measure and confirm outcomes,” Aubry and Carr wrote.

PROP is not following the data either. In a recent debate, PROP board member Adriane Fugh-Berman claimed that pain patients addicted to prescription opioids were still fueling the overdose epidemic, even though illicit fentanyl and other street drugs are linked to the vast majority of deaths.

“Those patients went to the street. They got addicted to heroin. The reason those deaths went up is because the illicit supply of opioids has become laced with fentanyl and has become highly dangerous,” Fugh-Berman said, without citing any evidence. “It’s not that prescription opioids have nothing to do with it.  Many patients started on prescription opioids ended up on the streets looking for heroin. They’re dying because the illicit opioid products have become extremely dangerous. That’s what’s killing people.”

Fugh-Berman is not an unbiased observer. She and at least five other PROP board members have testified as paid expert witnesses in opioid litigation cases, making as much as $850 an hour for their testimony blaming drug makers for the opioid crisis.

A recent analysis of overdose deaths in 2020 found that prescription opioids ranked well behind illicit fentanyl, alcohol, cocaine, methamphetamine and heroin as the leading cause of drug deaths.   

At least one critic of opioid prescribing feels it’s time to change the focus on why so many Americans are overdosing. Beth Macy, who wrote the best-selling book “Dopesick,” says drug use has changed. 

“At this point, too much attention is focused on stemming the oversupply of prescription opioids. We now have a generation of drug users that started with heroin and fentanyl.”

— Beth Macy, author of "Dopesick"

“At this point, too much attention is focused on stemming the oversupply of prescription opioids,” Macy writes in her new book, ‘Raising Lazarus.’ “We now have a generation of drug users that started with heroin and fentanyl.”

As for the CDC, a spokesperson tells PNN the agency won’t publish its guideline revision until late this year, nearly seven years after the original guideline was released. 

“CDC is currently in the process of revising the draft update to the 2016 Guideline based on comments received during the public comment period and peer review. We anticipate the final Guideline will be released later this year,” the spokesperson said.

Computer Algorithms Improve Timeliness of Overdose Data

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

An automated process using computer algorithms to analyze death certificates would speed up and improve data collection on drug overdose deaths, according to a new study by UCLA researchers.

The current system used to track U.S. overdose deaths relies on medical examiners and county coroners – including some with little medical training -- to determine the cause of death and drugs involved. Death certificates are then sent to local jurisdictions or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which codes them according to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Edition (ICD-10).

The coding process is manual and time consuming, resulting in delays of several months before the deaths are included in CDC overdose data. With drug deaths at record levels and more dangerous substances entering the illicit drug supply, researchers say that antiquated system delays an effective public health response.

"The overdose crisis in America is the number one cause of death in young adults, but we don't know the actual number of overdose deaths until months after the fact," said lead author David Goodman-Meza, MD, assistant professor of medicine in the division of infectious diseases at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA.

"We also don't know the number of overdoses in our communities, as rapidly released data is only available at the state level, at best. We need systems that get this data out fast and at a local level so public health can respond. Machine learning and natural language processing can help bridge this gap."

Goodman-Meza and his colleagues used computer algorithms to analyze the text for keywords in nearly 35,500 death certificates from nine U.S. counties in 2020. The counties include major cities such as Chicago, Los Angeles, San Diego and Milwaukee.

The researchers say their automated system demonstrated “excellent diagnostic performance” in classifying the drugs involved in overdoses.

“We found that for most substances evaluated, the performance of these algorithms was perfect or near perfect. These models could be used to automate classification of unstructured free-text, thus avoiding the manual and time-consuming process of individually reading each entry and classifying them to a specific substance,” researchers reported in JAMA Network Open.

“Excellent performance was shown for multiple substances, including any opioid, heroin, fentanyl, methamphetamine, cocaine, and alcohol using models for general text. Yet for prescription opioids and benzodiazepines, there was a considerable performance gap.”

That “performance gap” is due in part to weaknesses in the drug classification system, which lumps many synthetic opioids under the same ICD-10 code, including fentanyl, fentanyl analogs, tramadol and buprenorphine – a semi-synthetic opioid used in the addiction treatment drug Suboxone.

In the past, CDC has classified all drug deaths using that code as “prescription opioid overdoses” even though the drugs may have been illicit --- which is the case for the vast majority of deaths involving fentanyl. This resulted in government estimates of prescription opioid overdoses being significantly inflated for many years.

Using the computer algorithms developed at UCLA, prescription opioids ranked far behind fentanyl, alcohol and other substances identified as the cause of death in 8,738 overdoses.

Drugs Involved in 2020 Overdose Deaths in 9 U.S. Counties

Source: JAMA Network Open

Until recently, there was a 6-month time lag in drug deaths being counted in the CDC’s monthly Provisional Drug Overdose Death Counts report. The timeliness of the reports were improved earlier this year to a 4-month delay, but Goodman-Meza says they could be improved even more.  

"If these algorithms are embedded within medical examiner's offices, the time could be reduced to as early as toxicology testing is completed, which could be about three weeks after the death," he said.

Epidural Shortages Impacting Pain Management Worldwide

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Global shortages of epidural catheters and contrast dye used in medical imaging are forcing some healthcare providers to ration or postpone epidural procedures, which are commonly used to relieve back pain, labor pain and as spinal anesthesia for some surgeries.

At present, most of the catheter shortages are being reported by hospitals in Canada, with anecdotal reports of shortages in the United States. Epidural catheters are thin plastic tubes that are inserted into the lower back by a needle to allow physicians to deliver steroids and other pain medications to the spinal area.

Health Canada last week added Flex-Tip epidural catheterization kits to its list of medical device shortages. The shortage began on July 18 and is expected to continue until the end of the year. The epidural kits are made by Arrow International of Pennsylvania, which did not respond to a PNN request for comment.

The Vice-President of the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society said most of the shortages are in western Canada, and that healthcare providers are frustrated by a lack of information from catheter manufacturers and Health Canada.

“If the shortage is global, maybe it wouldn’t make a difference. But I do think that on the communication side, on the supply-chain side and the protocols that exist, there’s room for improvement,” Dr. Lucie Filteau told The Canadian Press. “We thought there were just isolated little pockets, and people started to become aware that it was more widespread.”

In May, an international supplier of epidural kits in the UK announced a disruption to its supply due to shortages of a blue dye used in tubing. The disruption was projected to last until July, but appears to be ongoing. Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration recently issued an alert warning of “temporary supply issues affecting popular brands of epidural kits in overseas markets.”

“We have anecdotally heard of shortages,” a spokesperson for the American Society of Anesthesiologists told PNN when asked about catheter shortages in the U.S. The organization was planning to survey its members to get a better idea of the extent of the problem. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration does not currently have epidural catheters on its list of medical device shortages.

Epidurals are widely used in the U.S. and Canada to relieve pain during labor and cesarean sections. The injections numb the lower part of the body, allowing expectant mothers to remain awake during child birth. Nitrous oxide – more commonly known as laughing gas – can be used as an alternative to epidurals.

In addition to treating labor pain, epidural injections are widely used for back pain. About 9 million epidural steroid injections are performed annually in the U.S., even though they are not FDA-approved. The FDA has warned that injection of steroids into the epidural space can result in rare but serious neurological problems, including loss of vision, stroke and paralysis.

Meanwhile, a global shortage of contrast dyes that began in April due to COVID-related supply chain disruptions in China appears to be easing. Contrast dyes — also known as imaging agents — play a vital role in epidural procedures because they help providers “see” where a needle is being placed. Even a minor mistake could lead to permanent damage to the spinal cord.

Australian health officials said last week the supply of imaging agents was improving, but that normal supplies are “not likely to resume before the end of 2022.” They urged providers to continue conserving contrast agents and to postpone imaging that was not urgent.