Serious Complications Caused By Poorly Treated Pain

By Forest Tennant, PNN Columnist

Most anyone will tell you that blood pressure goes up due to pain. What is almost unrecognized in medical practice today, however, is that untreated or undertreated pain has such profound and devastating effects on the cardiovascular and endocrine systems that it will inevitably shorten the lifespan of individuals with intractable pain syndrome (IPS).

Constant pain elevates adrenaline and glucose at the same time that it overstimulates the autonomic nervous system, resulting in these cardiovascular (CV) complications:

• High Blood Pressure (Hypertension)               

• Elevated Pulse Rate (Tachycardia)                             

• Elevated Cholesterol (Lipids)                       

• Arteriosclerosis  

• Angina Pectoris

• Cardiac Arrythmias

• Heart Attack

• Sudden Death

The body needs a rest from constant pain to rejuvenate and re-energize the body’s CV and endocrine systems. The first goals of pain treatment must include the attainment of at least some pain free or nearly pain free hours, which enables the body to sleep and let the CV and endocrine system recuperate.

Calcium Complications

For many years, patients, families and doctors were bewildered when a chronic pain patient developed osteoporosis, scoliosis, arthritis, or even their teeth fell out. Now we know why. It is primarily because IPS causes multiple abnormalities in the endocrine system that lower calcium levels. 

Intractable pain is a huge stress that never shuts off, so it causes constant demand on the body’s glands to elevate the “Big 3” hormones: insulin, cortisol and adrenaline. This is made worse if pain is untreated or undertreated. 

Over time, the constant elevation of cortisol causes calcium to dissolve and leave the tissues of the teeth, joints and spine. Vertebrae may become so fragile with osteoporosis that the spine may collapse in places and give you scoliosis. When calcium leaves the joints, you get arthritis. People with IPS frequently have fractured hips and knee joints that have to be replaced. 

When cortisol is raised too long by constant pain, testosterone and estradiol levels may drop, and these two hormones are critical to prevent osteoporosis as they function to build bone, joints and teeth.

When cortisol is too high for too long, glucose and insulin are also raised, causing a nutritional state that may reduce vitamin D, magnesium, and other nutrients critical for tooth and bone maintenance.  

All persons with IPS and their families need to know about the cardiovascular and endocrine complications from untreated or undertreated pain. You may also need to inform your medical and dental practitioners about these health risks. Ask them to test you for high blood pressure, elevated pulse rate, high cholesterol and glucose levels. Most can easily test you for osteopenia (early osteoporosis), endocrine function and vitamin D levels.

Forest Tennant is retired from clinical practice but continues his research on intractable pain and arachnoiditis. This column is adapted from newsletters recently issued by the IPS Research and Education Project of the Tennant Foundation. Readers interested in subscribing to the newsletter can sign up by clicking here.

The Tennant Foundation has given financial support to Pain News Network and sponsors PNN’s Patient Resources section.  

Cannabis Significantly Reduced Rx Opioid Use in Chronic Pain Patients

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Nearly half of chronic pain patients using medical cannabis reported significant improvement in their pain levels and most were able to reduce or stop their use of opioid pain medication, according to a large new study.

The findings, recently published in the journal Cureus, involved 550 chronic pain patients being treated at three licensed medical cannabis clinics in the northeastern United States. The study is one of the first to look at patients who were prescribed opioids for at least three months and continued to use opioids after starting cannabis therapy.

“Our results show a remarkable percentage of patients both reporting complete cessation of opioids and decreasing opioid usage by the addition of medical cannabis, with results lasting for over a year for the majority,” wrote lead author Kevin Takakuwa, MD, an emergency medicine physician affiliated with the Society of Cannabis Clinicians.

“We hypothesize these effects may be due to the reported synergistic decrease in pain that has been shown with adding cannabis to opioids. Likely, as a result, the majority expressed not wanting opioids in the future, particularly those in the younger age group.”

Pain patients enrolled in the study initially took a small amount of cannabis orally (a balanced blend of THC and CBD) and titrated to a higher dose until it had an effect.

Almost half (48%) reported a significant decrease in their pain, and most said they had improved quality of life (87%) and better physical function (80%) while using medical cannabis.

Most reported they either stopped using prescription opioids (40%) or reduced their opioid use (45%).  Nearly two thirds said they sustained the change for over a year (65%) and did not want to take opioids again (63%).  

“One reason for our impressive results may be the focused protocol employed by the study sites, which recommends a small amount of oral cannabis taken in conjunction with each opioid medication dose with small increments to titration, in a motivated patient population,” wrote Takakuwa.

“There has never been a randomized controlled human trial examining how to use medical cannabis in combination with opioids and there is no established protocol that exists. Experts disagree on how to manage opioid prescriptions in patients with chronic pain who use cannabis, and many clinicians defer to the patient or dispensary agent on decisions regarding specific cannabis products and dosages.”

But some doctors take another approach and simply get rid of patients after learning they use cannabis. It’s worth noting that nearly one in four patients (24.8%) enrolled in the study reported losing access to prescription medication or medical care as a result of their cannabis use or after testing positive for THC.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention specifically recommends that doctors not test for THC or dismiss patients for their cannabis use “because this could constitute patient abandonment and could have adverse consequences for patient safety” by forcing them to live with untreated pain or turn to street drugs.

Rare Disease Education: Paget’s Disease

By Barby Ingle, PNN Columnist

One of my personal missions is to educate others on the rare diseases and conditions that cause chronic pain. This year I will be posting a series of monthly articles on 12 different rare and ultra-rare conditions.

According to the National Human Genome Research Institute, a rare condition is generally considered a disease when it affects fewer than 200,000 people in the United States. Just because a person has a rare disease does not mean that they are alone. Altogether, rare disease affects up to 30 million Americans.

There are about 7,000 rare diseases, but less than 5 percent of them have an FDA approved treatment option. I have seen some great improvements over the past few years in recognizing rare diseases and in developing new treatments.  

The first condition being looked at in this series is Paget’s disease of bone. I do not know anyone with this condition personally, but I thought it was a good place to start. My hope is you will recognize some of these symptoms and can pass them on to give someone hope, help and a place to start a conversation with their health providers.

Paget’s disease causes the body to generate new bone tissue faster than normal, resulting in bones that are softer, weaker and more fragile. According to the Mayo Clinic, risk factors for Paget’s disease include being over the age of 40, male, having a family history of the condition, and being of European descent. Researchers suspect a combination of environmental and genetic factors contribute to the disease.

They test for Paget’s disease in three ways to get a diagnosis: x-rays, blood tests and bone scans. In its early stages, most people have no symptoms, so Paget’s disease is sometimes found by accident, such as when one of the tests is done for another reason and they end up with Paget’s as the final diagnosis.

Symptoms of Paget’s disease include difficulty walking, bone deformities, bone fractures, bowlegs, headaches, and joint stiffness. The chronic pain associated with Paget’s disease typically shows up first in the back, hip, legs or skull.

The pain and other symptoms worsen over time. Initially, patients often have a “pins and needles” sensation in their extremities, but the pain can become very unpleasant over time. Bone pain is typically described as extreme tenderness and aching, and is present whether you are moving or not.   

Currently there is no cure for Paget’s disease but there are some treatments that may be helpful, such as bisphosphates and dietary supplements to help strengthen bones. As with many rare and chronic diseases, early intervention is best, but a lifetime of care is important.

There are a few online support groups for patients with Paget’s disease, such as the Facebook page of the Paget's Association. You can also check out this video that helps explain the condition further.

I will be back next month to continue this series with a new rare condition.

Barby Ingle lives with reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD), migralepsy and endometriosis. Barby is a chronic pain educator, patient advocate, and president of the International Pain Foundation. She is also a motivational speaker and best-selling author on pain topics. More information about Barby can be found at her website.  

Does Chronic Pain Lead to Hoarding?

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

People living with chronic pain often face stigmas in their daily lives. In addition to being unfairly labeled as drug seekers, pain sufferers are often perceived as lazy malingerers who use their pain as an excuse to stay home, avoid social activities and not work.

Unfair or not, there is some truth to the notion that people in pain are less active physically – and for some that’s led to compulsive hoarding, according to a new study at the University of Florida.

Researchers surveyed over 20,000 people about their hoarding habits and identified over 2,600 cases of “hoarding disorder,” a condition characterized by difficulty in parting with possessions because of a compulsive need to save them. These extreme hoarders were more likely to have chronic pain and other potentially life-shortening medical conditions such as obesity, diabetes, heart problems, high cholesterol and sleep apnea.

On average, compulsive hoarders were about 17 pounds heavier than people without the disorder. They were also more likely to be women, less likely to have a college degree, less likely to see a doctor, and more likely to suffer falls in their home. 

“Hoarding behaviors are associated with limited activity involvement, an increased risk of falls and difficulties with self-care — all of which likely contribute to substantial functional impairment and reduced physical well-being,” lead author Sara Nutley, a data analyst at University of Florida Health, reported in the Journal of Psychiatric Research. 

Hoarding disorder is more than just collecting or being unwilling to part with a few cherished mementos. The American Psychiatric Association says compulsive hoarders save everyday items that most people consider worthless and become emotional at the thought of getting rid of them. Hoarded items are often stored haphazardly, leading to clutter that causes health and safety issues and disrupts hoarders’ lives and living space.

Hoarding not only contributes to health issues, Nutley and her colleagues say medical problems like chronic pain can lead to even more hoarding.

“First, it is possible that profound functional impairment and low levels of health care utilization contribute to the progression of medical comorbidity among individuals with hoarding disorder,” they wrote. “Second, it is possible that individuals with existing medical conditions experience increased impairment in daily self-care activities that lead to the build-up of clutter.

“Medical conditions may worsen hoarding behavior and the underlying causes of hoarding behavior may be a risk factor for both hoarding disorder and medical morbidity.”

The Mayo Clinic says the treatment of hoarding disorder is difficult because many people don’t recognize the impact of hoarding on their lives. If hoarded items are removed, people become frustrated and angry, and start collecting again. The main treatment for hoarding disorder is cognitive behavioral therapy and medications to treat anxiety and depression.  

It’s High Time to Stop the Hurt

By Leslie Bythewood, Guest Columnist

Imagine waking up one morning with the worst pain you could ever dream up.

That’s what happened to me in 2000, only it would take another seven years before my now retired doctor broke the news that I had Arnold-Chiari malformation, a rare and incurable disease that causes unrelenting head pain.

A brain MRI revealed that my skull was squeezing my brain like a sponge, putting extreme pressure on the arteries in my brain. “It herniates out,” my doctor explained.

Fortunately, he was willing to prescribe opiates and my pain was well-managed for the next decade.

But in 2017, the year I became eligible for Medicare, I learned my doctor had opted out of that federal program, forcing me to find a new primary care physician. That’s when my life suddenly took a nosedive.

For the next year, four different physicians would attempt to taper me off opiates without my consent, causing my chronic pain to escalate exponentially and inflicting all sorts of adverse side effects from the anticonvulsants and antidepressants they prescribed.

I eventually found a caring doctor who understood my pain and immediately put me back on the tried-and-true opiate treatment plan that enabled me to function.

LESLIE BYTHEWOOD

One year later that doctor was forced to abruptly surrender his DEA license without justification, preventing him from prescribing opiates to any of his patients, including me. Nevertheless, undeterred and refusing to leave his patients in the lurch, he provided a soft landing by referring all of us to new doctors, enabling me to carry out my daily activities with no pain or intolerable side effects.

Opiates are the only class of medication that work for me and millions of other Americans with intractable pain, but it’s hard for many of us to find doctors willing to prescribe them. What caused the vast majority of doctors to go running the other way with their tails tucked between their legs was the 2016 CDC opioid guideline, which encourages cautious prescribing and arbitrary 90 MME dose limits.

Almost immediately after the guideline was released, patients could no longer count on their doctor to make informed clinical decisions about whether to prescribe opiates. The CDC had driven a big fat wedge between the doctor and the patient.

Many doctors never considered the CDC guideline as voluntary and viewed it as an unbending rule that tolerates no wiggle room. They gave their patients two choices: either taper off opiates or be dismissed for good.

The truth of the matter is that only a small percentage of patients become addicted to opiates. The vast majority take their medications as prescribed and are never at risk for addiction or overdosing. And that’s exactly why, despite the fact that opioid prescribing is at a 20-year low, the number of U.S. overdose deaths continues to soar, driven by street drugs such as heroin, cocaine, illicit fentanyl and methamphetamines, not pain medication.

The blame for this lies squarely with the CDC, DEA, Department of Justice and the news media, who continue to point the finger at doctors for “overprescribing” when the real culprit is street drugs. We don’t have an “opioid epidemic” at all. What we have is a street drug overdose epidemic, plain and simple.

The harm that’s been inflicted on millions of chronic pain patients needs to be rectified by throwing out the misguided CDC guideline and leaving it to the Food and Drug Administration to publish a new set of guidelines that do not encourage arbitrary dosage limits and restore the doctor-patient relationship.

But scrapping the CDC guideline doesn’t go far enough.

We desperately need federal and state laws that protect doctors and patients from the unwarranted, overreaching scrutiny of the DEA and ensure that patients with serious and debilitating diseases get adequate care without delay. Forced tapering and leaving people to suffer in pain are not the answer.

Once and for all, the war on drugs must come to a screeching halt. Restricting legitimate patients from access to opiates is not going to end the street drug overdose epidemic.

Leslie Bythewood is a freelance writer who lives in North Carolina.

PNN invites other readers to share their stories with us. Send them to editor@painnewsnetwork.org.

Opioid Prescribing Limits Failed to Reduce Overdoses in British Columbia

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

British Columbia’s opioid guideline failed to have any significant impact on overdoses, hospital admissions or deaths in the year after it was adopted, according to new research published in CMAJ Open. The study is the latest to show that opioid prescribing limits have been misdirected and ineffective in slowing North America’s opioid crisis.

The College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia released strict professional guidelines for the “safe prescribing” of opioids and sedatives in 2016, after the Canadian province was hit by a wave of overdoses and deaths. The BC guidelines, which are similar to the CDC’s opioid guideline in the United States, warn doctors to be cautious about opioid prescribing and to avoid increasing doses over 90 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per day.

Researchers at the University of British Columbia wanted to see how effective the BC guideline was in reducing overdoses, so they analyzed health data on over 68,000 patients on long term opioid therapy. A previous study by the same research team found a “modest” reduction in opioid use in the 10 months after the guideline was introduced, as well as more tapering.

Did the reduced prescribing result in fewer overdoses?  No.

Researchers found no significant change in opioid overdose hospital admissions, opioid overdose mortality, all-cause emergency department visits, all-cause mortality, or all-cause hospital admissions after the BC guideline was adopted. They also found no evidence that pain patients turned to street drugs after their opioid prescriptions were reduced or stopped.

“Concern has been expressed that policies focused on reducing prescribing of opioid analgesics could increase opioid-related deaths if patients unable to access prescription opioids for adequate pain relief turned to street drugs and were exposed to dangerously high levels of synthetic opioids. Our study did not find evidence that the standards and guidelines had the unintended consequence of increasing opioid overdose hospital admissions or opioid overdose mortality,” wrote lead author Richard Morrow, a senior research analyst at UBC.

Critics say the lack of evidence is proof that opioid prescribing has little to do with British Columbia’s overdose crisis.   

“The results are not unexpected and demonstrate the folly of limiting opioids to pain patients in a futile attempt to deal with overdoses from illicit street drugs. The policy has created considerable pain and anxiety along with a worsening quality of life for nothing,” said Marvin Ross, a patient advocate with the Chronic Pain Association of Canada. 

British Columbia’s Coroners Office expects 2020 to be a record breaking year for overdoses in the province, with about five drug deaths every day. A recent study found that the vast majority of BC’s overdoses involved illicit fentanyl and other street drugs. Only 2.4% of the nearly 1,800 fatal overdoses in BC from 2015 to 2017 involved opioid medication alone.

Stricter opioid prescribing policies have also been ineffective in slowing the overdose crisis in the United States. Prescription opioid use in the U.S. is at its lowest level in 20 years, while more Americans are dying from overdoses than ever before.

Why Water Soaking Works

By Forest Tennant, PNN Columnist

There is no medical treatment older than water soaking. It is legend and still works. Adhesive Arachnoiditis and other Spinal Canal Inflammatory Disorders (SCID’s) are particularly helped by water soaking – so much so that we consider it an essential treatment.

Why water soaking relieves pain has been a mystery until recent times. It is known that damaged or “dead” nerves won’t conduct  the body’s natural electric currents, so electricity backs up and is trapped or retained in body tissues. The result is more inflammation and pain “all over.”

Electricity has a negative charge and water tends to have a positive charge, so it pulls out excess electricity from the body, reducing inflammation and pain. If the water contains a mineral, it will pull out even more electricity. That is why mineral hot baths and Epsom Salts are so effective.

The lumbar-sacral spinal canal is loaded with nerve roots. They constantly conduct electric currents that go from the spinal cord to the legs, feet, bladder, sex organs and intestine.

Any damage, by any cause, to the spinal canal nerve roots causes a backup of electricity which is painful and produces even more inflammation. To prevent disease progression, daily water soaking can be most helpful.

Types of Water Soaking

You don’t have to have a jacuzzi or pool to do water soaking. A bathtub is great, but most of us take showers. When you shower, keep the water as hot as you can stand, and massage and stretch your back muscles as the hot water runs over your back. Soaking for 10 to 15 minutes in a jacuzzi, pool or bathtub is preferable, but hot showers morning and night is about as good.

Don’t forget the Epsom Salts. The body normally excretes its excess electricity into the air, mainly through nerve ends in the hands, head and feet. Foot soaking, particularly with Epsom Salts or other herbal salts, is an age-old remedy that attracts the electric currents that travel down the sciatic and other leg nerves.

Another soaking technique is a warm, water-soaked towel or other wet wrap placed over the lower back for 5-10 minutes. Remember, water soaking isn’t an “all wet” idea.

Forest Tennant is retired from clinical practice but continues his research on the treatment of intractable pain and arachnoiditis. This column is adapted from bulletins recently issued by the Arachnoiditis Research and Education Project . Readers interested in subscribing to the  bulletins should send an email to tennantfoundation92@gmail.com.

The Tennant Foundation gives financial support to Pain News Network and sponsors PNN’s Patient Resources section.  

FDA Tightens Regulation of Fentanyl Medication

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Illicit fentanyl may be a deadly scourge on the black market, but for thousands of Americans in severe cancer pain, prescription fentanyl is an essential medicine. And for some, the potent synthetic opioid may soon be harder to obtain.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently announced plans to tighten its Risk Evaluation and Mitigation (REMS) program for transmucosal immediate-release fentanyl (TIRF) products. TIRF medicines such as Actiq and Subsys are approved for breakthrough pain in cancer patients, who regularly take other opioids around-the-clock and are considered “opioid tolerant.”

TIRF lozenges, sprays and tablets are so effective that they’re often prescribed off-label for other types of breakthrough pain. The problem with that, according to the FDA, is that up to 55% of patients prescribed a TIRF medicine are not opioid tolerant and received a TIRF prescription for an unapproved use.

“Data have suggested that prescribing of TIRF medicines still occurs in patients who are not opioid tolerant,” FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn, MD, said in a statement. “With this in mind, the FDA finalized modifications to the REMS program to address the persistence of these concerning prescribing practices. These changes will also improve our ability to monitor for adverse events and ensure safe use of these medicines.”

Under the strengthened REMS program, prescribers and pharmacies will be required to document a patient’s opioid tolerance for every TIRF prescription that is written or dispensed, including refills. A new patient registry is also being established for everyone who receives a TIRF medicine, so the prescriptions can be monitored for signs of misuse, addiction and overdose.

“All patients prescribed for outpatient use must be enrolled in the registry prior to receiving the first TIRF prescription. The Patient Enrollment Form is used to ensure that patients are aware of the registry requirement and that patients have been counseled appropriately about the safe use of the TIRF medicines, including the risk of respiratory depression, the need to be opioid tolerant as defined in labeling and proper storage of the TIRF medicines,” an FDA spokesperson explained in an email to PNN.

The email said the patient registry would not be available to law enforcement. Prescribing information will only be collected by TIRF manufacturers and will not publicly identify individual patients or prescribers.

“Collection of patient registry information is intended to help assure the safe use of these products, not for law enforcement purposes,” the email said. “FDA’s disclosure laws and regulations relating to information in FDA’s possession protect from public disclosure any information where the release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.”

That pledge is noteworthy, because prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) and other databases are being weaponized by law enforcement agencies to target physicians, pharmacies and patients who are deemed to be lawbreakers based on the dose and quantity of opioid prescriptions.

Fewer TIRF Prescriptions

Why the FDA is acting now is a bit unclear, because the number of people prescribed TIRF products has been declining for years, from about 14,400 patients in 2012 to just 4,700 patients in 2017. TIRF medications in 2017 accounted for just 0.02% of all opioid prescriptions dispensed at retail pharmacies.  

Reports of deaths and other adverse events from using the drugs have also fallen sharply. The FDA’s Adverse Events Reporting System received over 20,500 reports of adverse events involving Actiq in 2018, but there were only a few dozen cases in 2019.

“I would like to know what data the FDA has that prompted this action,” says Lynn Webster, MD, a pain management expert and past president of the American Academy of Pain Medicine. “TIRF opioids are rarely abused or associated with overdoses.”

Webster is also concerned that the additional paperwork and scrutiny by the REMS program may discourage doctors and pharmacists from writing or filling TIRF prescriptions. 

“Since TIRF opioids are only indicated for cancer related pain, more barriers to prescribing these medications may mean they will not be prescribed.  That would be unfortunate because the TIRFs are the most effective treatment for severe breakthrough pain,” Webster said. “I hope this policy is more than just checking a box for the FDA, and that they plan to measure the impact on patients' access to the medication and on their pain relief.”

The tougher REMS regulations for TIRF products go into effect in March 2021.

Gabapentinoids Riskier for Surgery Patients

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Another study is casting doubt on the use of gabapentinoids such as Lyrica (pregabalin) and Neurontin (gabapentin) for pain relief during and after surgery.

Gabapentioids are a class of nerve medication originally developed to treat convulsions, but the drugs are increasingly being used as a trendy alternative to opioids for acute and chronic pain. Some U.S. hospitals are even using gabapentinoids for surgical pain and have phased out or reduced the use of opioids.

In an analysis of over 5 million adults admitted for major surgery in the U.S. from 2007 to 2017, researchers at Harvard Medical School found that using gabapentinoids with opioids increases the risk of overdose, respiratory depression and other adverse events. Researchers say the additional risk was “extremely low” and would result in one additional overdose for every 16,000 patients.

“Our findings add to the growing evidence that gabapentinoids can potentiate the respiratory depressant effects of opioids,” researchers reported in JAMA Network Open. “The events were rare… (but) patients receiving multimodal pain management therapy that includes gabapentinoids should be closely monitored for possible respiratory depression.”

The study did not examine whether gabapentiniods were effective in treating surgical pain or if they improved the analgesic effect of opioids.

In an editorial also published in JAMA Network Open, a pain management expert said more studies were needed to see if gabapentiniods were worth the additional risk.

“The evidence in support of the analgesic benefit of gabapentinoids combined with opioids for postoperative analgesia is equivocal; there is no real support that adding gabapentinoids to opioid pain relievers offers additive, much less synergistic, enhancements to pain control,” wrote Joseph Pergolizzi, Jr, MD, Chief Operating Officer of NEMA Research.  

“Considering that combination analgesic regimens generally reduce overall opioid consumption, this study is important because it shows that this may not necessarily translate to reducing opioid-associated adverse events. As combination analgesia gains traction for in-hospital acute painful conditions, such as postsurgical pain, it is important to be guided by evidence rather than intuition.”

No Significant Analgesic Effect

A recent study by Canadian researchers also found little evidence to support the use of gabapentinoids for surgical pain.

“No clinically significant analgesic effect for the perioperative use of gabapentinoids was observed. There was also no effect on the prevention of postoperative chronic pain and a greater risk of adverse events,” wrote lead author Michael Verret, MD, a resident at Laval University in Quebec City.  

These and other findings contradict guidelines published by the American Pain Society in 2016, which advocate “around the clock” use of gabapentin, pregabalin and other non-opioid drugs both before and after surgery.

The risk of becoming addicted or dependent on opioids after surgery is actually quite low. A 2016 study found that only 0.4% of elderly patients who were prescribed opioids for post-operative pain were still using them a year after their surgeries. Another study by Harvard researchers found that only 0.2% of surgery patients prescribed opioids were later diagnosed with opioid dependence, abuse or a non-fatal overdose.

Growing Concerns About Opioid Tapering

By Roger Chriss, PNN Columnist

A common belief about the opioid crisis assumes that patients develop a substance use disorder from taking opioid medication, and that many derive no long-term benefit from opioids and need to be tapered.

There is some truth to this, but reality is much more complicated.

First, not all patients who take opioids become addicted. The National Institute on Drug Abuse reports between 8 and 12 percent of patients prescribed opioids for chronic pain develop an opioid use disorder (OUD). Even that estimate may be too high, because the diagnosis of OUD is sometimes mistaken.  

In a recent study of 90 patients diagnosed with OUD at three Veterans Health Administration medical centers, physician Ben Howell and colleagues found that nearly a third of the diagnoses were probably wrong.

“Our study identified significant levels of likely inaccurate OUD diagnoses among veterans with incident OUD diagnoses. The majority of these cases reflected readily addressable systems errors,” researchers concluded. “If these inaccuracies are prevalent throughout the VHA, they could complicate health services research and health systems responses.”

Second, not all people who are tapered off prescription opioids improve. A new study in the Journal of Pain Research looked at 40 chronic pain patients who were tapered from an average daily dose of 80 MME (morphine milligram equivalent) down to 19 MME. The results were disappointing. There was only minor improvement in the patients’ cognitive function and no improvement in their quality of life, depression and anxiety.

There is at present no well-established approach to opioid tapering and little effort made to study patient outcomes.  In a recent paper, lead author Stefan Kertesz, MD, and colleagues say there is a “pill dynamic” approach to tapering that focuses on dose reduction alone.

"When a multi-faceted, complex health issue becomes a public health crisis, the desire to ‘solve’ or ‘mitigate’ takes hold with a momentum of its own. A crisis deserves no less. However, nationally adopted quality metrics have convinced some patients with pain that their survival and functioning are no longer concerns for the systems in which they receive care. This outcome is unacceptable," they concluded.

Patient Suffering and Suicides

The risks of forced opioid tapering are so urgent that nearly 100 physicians, academics and patient advocates recently published an open letter in the journal Pain Medicine warning of “an alarming increase in reports of patient suffering and suicides” caused by aggressive tapering:

“We therefore call for an urgent review of mandated opioid tapering policies for outpatients at every level of health care — including prescribing, pharmacy, and insurance policies — and across borders, to minimize the iatrogenic harm that ensues from aggressive opioid tapering policies and practices.

We call for the development and implementation of policies that are humane, compassionate, patient-centered, and evidence-based in order to minimize iatrogenic harms and protect patients taking long-term prescription opioids.”

The public health issue of opioid overdoses is complex, urgent and largely driven by street drugs, not pain medication. Opioid prescriptions are at 20-year lows, and the American Medical Association recently said it was “alarmed by an increasing number of reports of opioid-related overdoses, particularly from illicit fentanyl.”

And as National Institute of Drug Abuse director Nora Volkow, MD, stated in a recent blog post:

“Although deaths from opioids continue to command the public’s attention, an alarming increase in deaths involving the stimulant drugs methamphetamine and cocaine are a stark illustration that we no longer face just an opioid crisis. We face a complex and ever-evolving addiction and overdose crisis characterized by shifting use and availability of different substances and use of multiple drugs (and drug classes) together.”

Opioid tapering is no more a universal good than opioid prescribing was a universal evil. And opioid tapering will no more solve the overdose crisis than opioid prescribing alone caused it. Instead, opioid tapering may harm the very people it is intended to help, and it may not help the crisis that it is motivated by. Better public health policy and clinical practice are urgently needed.

Roger Chriss lives with Ehlers Danlos syndrome and is a proud member of the Ehlers-Danlos Society. Roger is a technical consultant in Washington state, where he specializes in mathematics and research. 

Do Prescription Opioids Increase Social Pain and Isolation?

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Long-term use of opioid medication may increase social isolation, anxiety and depression for chronic pain patients, according to psychiatric and pain management experts at the University of Washington School Medicine.

In an op/ed recently published in Annals of Family Medicine, Drs. Mark Sullivan and Jane Ballantyne say opioid medication numbs the physical and emotional pain of patients, but interferes with the human need for social connections.

“Their social and emotional functioning is messed up under a wet blanket of opioids,” Sullivan said in a UW Medicine press release.

Sullivan and Ballantyne are board members of Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing (PROP), an influential anti-opioid activist group. Ballantyne, who is president of PROP, was a member of the “Core Expert Group” that advised the CDC during the drafting of its controversial 2016 opioid guideline. She has retired as a professor of pain medicine at the university, while Sullivan remains active as a professor of psychiatry.

In their op/ed, Sullivan and Ballantyne say it is wrong to assume that chronic pain arises solely from tissue damage caused by trauma or disease. They cite neuroimaging studies that found emotional and physical pain are processed in the same parts of the human brain.  While prescription opioids may lessen physical pain, they interfere with the production of endorphins – opioid-like hormones that help us feel better emotionally.

“Many of the patients who use opioid medications long term for the treatment of chronic pain have both physical and social pain,” they wrote. “Rather than helping the pain for which the opioid was originally sought, persistent opioid use may be chasing the pain in a circular manner, diminishing natural rewards from normal sources of pleasure, and increasing social isolation.

“To make matters worse, the people who need and want opioids the most, and who choose to use them over the long term, tend to be those with the most complex forms of chronic pain, containing both physical and social elements. We have called this process ‘adverse selection’ because these are also the people who are also at the greatest risk for continuous or escalating opioid use, and the development of complex dependence.”

Sullivan and Ballantyne say doctors need to recognize that when patients have both physical and social pain, long-term opioid therapy is “more likely to harm than help.”

“We believe that short-term opioid therapy, lasting no more than a month or so, will and should remain a common tool in clinical practice. But long-term opioid therapy that lasts months and perhaps years should be a rare occurrence because it does not treat chronic pain well, it impairs human social and emotional function, and can lead to opioid dependence or addiction,” they wrote.

Angry and Depressed Patients

It’s not the first time Sullivan and Ballantyne have weighed in on the moods and temperament of chronic pain patients. In a 2018 interview with Pain Research Forum, for example, Ballantyne said patients often have “psychiatric comorbidities” and become “very angry” at anyone who suggests they shouldn’t be on opioids.

“I’ve never seen an angry patient who is not taking opiates. It’s people on opiates who are angry because they’re frightened, desperate, and need to stay on them. And I don’t blame them because it is very difficult to come off of opiates,” she said.

In a 2017 interview with The Atlantic, Sullivan said depression and anxiety heighten physical pain and fuel the need for opioids. “People have distress — their life is not working, they’re not sleeping, they’re not functioning,” Sullivan said, “and they want something to make all that better.”

JANE BALLANTYNE MARK SULLIVAN

In a controversial 2015 commentary they co-authored in the New England Journal of Medicine, Sullivan and Ballantyne said chronic pain patients should learn to accept pain and get on with their lives, and that relieving pain intensity should not be the primary focus of doctors. The article infuriated both patients and physicians, including dozens who left bitter comments.

“Great job. I will be going into the coffin business thanks to these believers that people should suck it up. How NEJM even recognizes these people as doctors and not quacks is beyond me,” wrote a family practice physician.

“I take just enough narcotic pain meds to cut the edge off of my pain to be coherent enough to love my wife and respond to your constant misinformation,” wrote a patient.

Ballantyne and Sullivan’s op/ed in Annals of Family Medicine has yet to produce a similar response, either pro or con. The article was submitted to the journal over a year ago, but is only being published now.

Ballantyne disclosed in her conflict-of-interest statement that she has been a paid consultant in opioid litigation lawsuits, while Sullivan disclosed that he provided expert testimony for the states of Maryland and Missouri.

Other PROP board members have also found a lucrative sideline testifying in lawsuits. The organization is currently conducting a fundraiser to hire a new Executive Director to “take PROP's work to the next level.”

Exercise Is Best Treatment for Low Back Pain, But Why?

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

There has long been a consensus that the best way to treat chronic lower back pain (CLBP) – the world’s leading cause of disability – is by staying active and exercising. But a new study by Australian researchers failed to identify precisely why exercise is beneficial.

“A lot of treatments have stemmed from studies for people with CLBP, but the one with the most consistent evidence of benefit is exercise,” says senior author Matt Jones, PhD, an exercise physiologist, clinician and researcher at the UNSW Sydney School of Medical Sciences. “Despite decades of research in the area and more than 100 studies we analysed in our review, we still do not have a good idea of why exercise might be effective for CLBP.”

Jones and his colleagues recently reported their findings in the journal Musculoskeletal Science and Practice. They reviewed 110 research papers on CLBP conducted in Australia, United States, China, Brazil and Europe, and found little agreement on why researchers thought exercise relieved lower back pain.

“Researchers proposed common reasons as to why exercise was beneficial, including improvements in fitness – for example, core stability, aerobic fitness – and improvements in mood and confidence,” Jones said. “But the effects of these proposed reasons on outcomes for people with CLBP were seldom examined in the papers.

“There have been trends in research over time, where everyone focuses on a ‘flavour of the month’ – like motor control or McKenzie therapy, for example – but because the effects of exercise are broad and it impacts on many different systems in the human body, it’s difficult for researchers to pinpoint exactly why they think it might be benefiting people with pain.”

At any given time, over 500 million people worldwide are suffering from CLBP, which is “non-specific” back pain lasting three months or longer – not the severe back pain caused by degenerative disc disease, spinal injuries, arthritis and other chronic conditions. CLBP mostly affects adults of working age in lower socioeconomic groups, who often have physically demanding jobs.

A 2018 review published in The Lancet by an international team of researchers found that CLBP is often treated with bad advice, inappropriate tests, risky surgeries and painkillers. The authors said there was limited evidence to support the use of opioids for low back pain, and epidural steroid injections and acetaminophen (paracetamol) were not recommended at all.

“The majority of cases of low back pain respond to simple physical and psychological therapies that keep people active and enable them to stay at work,” said lead author Professor Rachelle Buchbinder of Monash University in Australia. “Often, however, it is more aggressive treatments of dubious benefit that are promoted and reimbursed.”

Jones said the aggressive treatments may not work because they don’t address underlying psychological reasons for back pain.

“Chronic pain is tricky and there are a lot of factors that can contribute to it – so, it's not simply biological aspects of tissue damage, but there are psychosocial elements at play, as well things like a person’s mood or confidence in their own abilities to do something,” he said. “Today’s evidence suggests CLBP likely comes from the brain and nervous system being a bit over-protective and generating a pain response – despite no obvious physical damage to the body.”

Although his review did not address what specific exercises were most effective for CLBP, Jones and his team recommended 33 “mechanisms” that people can use to relieve back pain, such as building muscle strength and flexibility or through social support and coping strategies.

“Many scientists have investigated this question before and the short answer is, there are no specific exercises recommended to alleviate CLBP,” he said. “But there are literally hundreds of studies on exercise for people with chronic pain, not only CLBP, and researchers consistently find exercise is one of the most effective treatments – it might not cause huge reductions in pain and disability, but it does help.”

Ehlers-Danlos Is Common Cause of Intractable Pain

By Forest Tennant, PNN Columnist

Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS) is the best known of the hereditary collagen disorders. From birth, persons with EDS are preprogrammed to start dissolving collagen at some location in the body, as it causes a defect in the way collagen is produced or maintained throughout all tissues.

The fine and soft tissues that are the most susceptible to dissolution are found in the joints, ligaments, eyes, spine, gums and intestine. When these tissues deteriorate and begin to dissolve, inflammation, pain and neurologic impairments begin. The tissue may or may not rebuild and usually leaves permanent damage, pain and/or disability.

Collagen deterioration may start in childhood or middle age. An early sign is being double-jointed or extremely flexible.

It is unknown currently what the exact mechanism is, or what precipitating factors such as virus or trauma that initiate this reaction. Regardless, collagen dissolution will move to a new and different locations once the hereditary preprogramming begins.

EDS commonly hits the spinal canal and spine. The first major problem may be a cerebral spinal fluid leak, protrusion of a disc, Tarlov cyst or arachnoiditis. Given its predilection to hit the spine, EDS may produce the complication of Intractable Pain Syndrome (IPS). In fact, it seems to be emerging as the first or second most common cause of IPS.

EDS Screening Test

Our research has found that a high percentage of patients who have EDS don’t know it. If you have developed a spine or pain problem without an injury or other obvious cause, you should be screened for EDS.

This questionnaire was recently published to help screen people for EDS.   

1. Do you have pain in multiple locations?

2. Do you have extreme fatigue?

3. Are you clumsy sometimes and fall or walk into objects?

4. Are some of the joints in your hands, feet, elbow, hips or knees “loose” or quite flexible?

5. Have you had a lot of sprains or joint dislocations?

6. Is your skin thin in places?

7. Are you double-jointed or able to bend your fingers, arms, or ankle backward?

8. Are your hands and feet cold much of the time?

9. Do you bruise easily or have bruises that suddenly occur?

10.  Is your skin “stretchy” in some places?

11.  Are you constipated a lot?

12.  Do you suffer from heart burn or frequent episodes of food regurgitation? 

If you answered “Yes” to 6 or more of the 12 questions, you should see a doctor and have the diagnosis confirmed by a genetic test or skin biopsy.

If you have EDS or a hereditary collagen disorder, there are foods, supplements and hormones you can take to help restore and rebuild lost tissue. Click here to see them. These tissue building recommendations from the IPS Research and Education Project are meant to complement and supplement your treatment program, but are not a substitute for inflammation and pain control.

Forest Tennant is retired from clinical practice but continues his research on intractable pain and arachnoiditis. This column is adapted from newsletters recently issued by the IPS Research and Education Project of the Tennant Foundation. Readers interested in subscribing to the newsletter can sign up by clicking here.

The Tennant Foundation has given financial support to Pain News Network and sponsors PNN’s Patient Resources section.  

Excedrin Brands Recalled Due to Faulty Packaging

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

One of world’s most widely used over-the-counter pain relievers has turned into a real headache for GlaxoSmithKline (GSK).

The British pharmaceutical giant has recalled over 433,000 bottles of Excedrin because of holes found in bottles of five Excedrin brands: Excedrin Migraine Caplets, Excedrin Migraine Geltabs, Excedrin Extra Strength Caplets, Excedrin PM Headache Caplets and Excedrin Tension Headache Caplets.

There have been no reports of any injuries as a result of the faulty bottles, but GSK recalled them because of the risk of Excedrin tablets falling out and being swallowed by young children. Under U.S. federal law, the tablets must be sold in child resistant packaging.

“While the likelihood there are bottles on the market with holes is low, we are asking anyone who has purchased large-sized Excedrin (50 count and above) to check their Excedrin products and if there is a visible issue, contact GSK Consumer Relations at 1-800-468-7746 for a full refund. If your Excedrin bottle is not damaged, the product is safe to use as directed on the label,” GSK said in a statement.

GsK IMAGE

“We take product safety very seriously at GSK and while we have not received any complaints or safety concerns to date on this potential problem, we are still letting consumers know so they can check their Excedrin bottles themselves. We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience, and please be assured we are working closely with the bottle manufacturer to fix this problem as quickly as we can.”

The bottles were sold at pharmacies, stores and online from March 2018 through September 2020. There was no explanation given for what caused the holes or why it took so long for GSK to recognize there was a problem and order a recall.

In January, GSK temporarily halted production of Excedrin Extra Strength and Excedrin Migraine due to “inconsistencies” in their ingredients. That led to spot shortages of the pain relievers.

In 2012, an Excedrin manufacturing plant in Nebraska was shut down for several months after Excedrin bottles were found to contain broken and stray tablets for other medications. At the time, the Excedrin brand was owned by Novartis.

An FDA investigation found that Novartis failed to adequately investigate hundreds of consumer complaints of foreign products found in over-the-counter drugs produced at the Nebraska plant. GSK now holds majority ownership of Excedrin through a joint venture with Novartis.

A recent study found GSK to be the most heavily fined drug company in the United States.  GSK paid nearly $9.8 billion to settle 27 cases brought against it for bribery, corruption, improper marketing, pricing violations and selling adulterated drugs.

COVID Vaccines Appear Safe and Effective, But Key Questions Remain

By Bernard J. Wolfson, Kaiser Heralth News

The recent rollout of two newly authorized COVID-19 vaccines is a bright ray of hope at the pandemic’s darkest hour.

We now have a path that can lead us to happier times — even as we watch and suffer from the horrible onslaught of new infections, hospitalizations and deaths that mark the end of this regrettable year.

Health care workers and nursing home residents have already begun to get shots in the first phase of the rollout. Vaccinations should start to be available to the general public sometime in the first few months of next year.

The two vaccines — one developed by Pfizer and BioNTech, the other by Moderna — use the same novel genetic approach. Their development in under a year, shattering all records, is a marvel of science. It’s also a cause for concern for millions of Americans who fear the uncertainty of an unknown technology.

The clinical trial data for the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines show that when both shots of the dual-injection immunization are taken, three weeks to a month apart, they are about 95% effective — at least at preventing severe COVID illness.

However, “a vaccine that remains in the vial is 0% effective no matter what the data show,” says Dr. Walter Orenstein, a professor of infectious diseases at the Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta and associate director of the Emory Vaccine Center.

Hence, the imperative of persuading millions of people, across racial, cultural, religious, political and generational lines, to get immunized when a vaccine becomes available to them. A survey published this month showed 45% of respondents are taking a wait-and-see approach to vaccination.

Because the vaccines were developed under duress as the coronavirus exacted its deadly toll, the premium was on speed — “warp speed.” So although the number of people in the COVID-19 trials is as large as or larger than in previous vaccine trials, some key questions won’t be answered until millions more are vaccinated.

For example, we don’t know to what extent the vaccines will keep us from transmitting or contracting the virus. We don’t know whether irreversible side effects might emerge, or who is at higher risk from them. And we don’t know whether we’ll need to get vaccinated every year, every three years, or never again.

Skepticism about the vaccines reside in many quarters, including among African Americans, many of whom have a long-standing mistrust of the medical world; the vocal “anti-vaxxers”; and people of all stripes with perfectly understandable doubts. Not to mention communities with language barriers and immigrants without documents, who may fear coming forward.

Here are answers to some questions you might be asking yourself about the new vaccines:

Q: How can I be sure they’re safe?

There’s no ironclad guarantee. But the federal Food and Drug Administration, in authorizing the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines, determined that their benefits outweighed their risks.

The side effects observed in trial participants were common to other vaccines: pain at the injection site, fatigue, headache, muscle pain and chills.

“Those are minor side effects, and the benefit is not dying from this disease,” says Dr. George Rutherford, a professor of epidemiology at the University of California-San Francisco.

Saturday, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported six cases of anaphylactic allergic reaction in the first 272,000 people who got the Pfizer vaccine outside the clinical trials. This has led the CDC to recommend that people receiving the vaccine be observed for up to 30 minutes afterward. It’s possible other unexpected adverse effects could pop up down the road.

“The chances are low, but they are not zero,” says Orenstein. There’s not enough data yet to know if the vaccines pose an elevated risk to pregnant or lactating women, for example, or to immunocompromised people, such as those with HIV. And we know very little about the effects in children, who were not in the initial trials and for whom the vaccines are not authorized.

Q: Why should my family and I take it?

First of all, because you will protect yourselves from the possibility of severe illness or even death. Also, by getting vaccinated you will be doing your part to achieve a vaccination rate high enough to end the pandemic. Nobody knows exactly what percentage of the population needs to get inoculated for that to happen, but infectious disease experts put the number somewhere between 60% and 70% — perhaps even a little higher. Think of it as a civic duty to get your shots.

Q: So, when can I get mine?

It depends on your health status, age and work. In the first phase, already underway, health care workers and nursing home residents are getting vaccinated. The 40 million Moderna and Pfizer doses expected to be available by year’s end should immunize most of them.

Next in line are people 75 and older and essential workers in various public-facing jobs. They will be followed by people ages 65-74 and those under 65 with certain medical conditions that put them at high risk. Enough vaccine could be available for the rest of the population by late spring, but summer or even fall is more likely. Already, some distribution bottlenecks have developed.

On the bright side, two other vaccines — one from Johnson & Johnson, the other from AstraZeneca and Oxford University — could win FDA authorization early next year, significantly increasing the supply.

Q: Once I’m vaccinated, can I finally stop wearing a mask and physical distancing?

No. Especially not early on, before a lot of people have been vaccinated. One reason for that is self-protection. The Moderna and Pfizer vaccines are 95% effective, but that means you still have a 5% chance of falling ill if you are exposed to someone who hasn’t been vaccinated — or who has been but is still transmitting the virus.

Another reason is to protect others, since you could be the one shedding virus despite the vaccination.

Q: I’ve already had COVID-19, so I don’t need the vaccine, right?

We don’t know for sure how long exposure to the virus protects you from reinfection. Protection probably lasts at least a few months, but public health experts say it’s a good idea to get vaccinated when your turn comes up — especially if it’s been many months since you tested positive.

Q: How long before our lives get back to normal?

“If everything goes well, next Thanksgiving might be near normal, and we might be getting close to that by the summer,” says Dr. William Schaffner, a professor of infectious diseases at the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine in Nashville, Tennessee. ”But there would have to be substantial acceptance of the vaccine and data showing the virus moving in a downward direction.”

This story was produced by Kaiser Health News, which publishes California Healthline, an editorially independent service of the California Health Care Foundation.