Did Opioids Take Away Your Pain?

By Richard “Red” Lawhern, PhD

I write to and for pain patients in several medical journals and social media venues.  I’ve been doing this work for over 25 years. A few days ago, on one of those venues, I encountered the question asked in the headline: “Did opioids take away your pain?”

What follows is my answer.  

I come to this question from the perspective of a published healthcare writer and caregiver to a chronic neuropathic face pain patient. I weekly interact with thousands of patients in social media and via email distribution lists. Thus I “see” many types of pain and many lives impacted by pain.

Pain is the symptom that most often brings patients to a doctor's office. About 50 to 100 million U.S. citizens are affected by pain that significantly affects their quality of life and requires medical treatment.  In 2018, nearly one in five U.S. adults received a prescription for opioids. Prescription rates have dropped dramatically since then, potentially leaving millions of patients under-treated.

From deep study, I am convinced that opioid pain relievers are safe and effective for the great majority of people in whom they are medically managed by a trained and licensed clinician (doctor, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, etc.).

A small percentage of pain patients — estimated by some writers at 0.6% and others as high as 3% — are vulnerable to substance abuse and addiction. However, the numbers of medication abusers appear to be relatively constant, and are not affected by increased or decreased prescribing rates. This suggests that genetic factors might be involved in addiction, but medical literature isn’t conclusive on this issue. Other “causes” of addiction clearly contribute, such as social isolation, hopelessness, unemployment, and protracted untreated pain. 

Depression and anxiety almost certainly play significant roles in both addiction and suffering due to chronic pain. I see this demonstrated repeatedly in thousands of person-to-person contacts on social media.  I believe aggressive evaluation and treatment for depression is a necessary element for effective pain treatment.

Opioids are not needed by all pain patients. And some pain patients are either very slow or very fast metabolizers of opioids due to their genetics – causing a wide variation in the minimum effective dose between individuals.  Others may develop tolerance over time, requiring higher doses to obtain the same pain relief.

For patients managed over long periods on high doses, physical dependence (different from addiction), may develop and they may have withdrawal symptoms if they are tapered off treatment too rapidly. I see no consistent evidence for any effect that can be called “opioid induced hyperalgesia,” a theory that opioids can make pain worse.

Opioids create variable side effects — constipation, sleepiness, brain fog, nausea or low sexual libido.  These side effects can be managed in many people. And for patients who don’t find a balance, one opioid can be tapered down while a different opioid is titrated up. 

Unfortunately, many physicians seem to be unaware of the highly individual responses to these medications.  If a patient cannot tolerate one opioid and pain is severe enough to warrant using this class of medications, then other opioids can be tried.

There is no one-size-fits-all effective dose or safe dose in this class of medicines. I have talked with patients who get substantial pain reduction (rarely total pain relief) from minimal daily doses of 20 morphine milligram equivalent (MME). I’ve also talked with patients who benefited from a dose as high as 2,000 MME, while experiencing few side effects.  There is published literature in case reports pertaining to this widespread range of doses.

This background leads to a central observation:  the default procedure in long term treatment of pain is to first try non-opioids (primarily NSAIDS, sometimes anti-seizure meds for neuropathy); then to try relatively weak opioids like tramadol; and finally to try stronger opioids like hydrocodone or fentanyl patches. This procedure has been known for over 30 years as the World Health Organization’s “Pain Ladder.”

For all drug treatments, additional non-drug support therapy is appropriate.  By this, I mean patient and caregiver support groups, counseling, massage, physical therapy, acupuncture, cognitive behavioral therapy or interventional medicine. Given that such measures rarely improve pain more than marginally, they are not “preferable” to opioids. They can augment but not replace analgesic medication. 

For all opioid therapies, I believe the appropriate medical procedure is to taper up gradually from low doses, while observing and managing intended outcomes and unintended side effects, until a dose level is found that helps the patient manage their pain without creating dangerous side effects.  When this approach is used — even in patients who also deal with substance abuse issues — we see long-term improvements in patient quality of life. 

By contrast, it is now widely understood that forced tapering of patients to lower opioid doses or “cold turkey” withdrawal can be a direct cause of medical crises and sometimes patient suicide.  Patient desertion is never ethically or medically justifiable.

Used with appropriate oversight by a licensed physician, opioids are both safe and effective.  Addiction or substance abuse are rare in medically managed patients.  There is also no relationship between rates of prescribing versus hospital admissions or overdose related mortality. The continuing and widely shouted “association” between doctor-prescribed opioids and substance abuse is a false narrative that has enormously damaged patients and clinicians alike.

The original and draft revision of the 2016 CDC opioid guideline is fatally flawed by anti-opioid political agendas and outright fraudulent junk science. In my view, these guidelines must be publicly repudiated and withdrawn without replacement. All state guidelines referenced to the CDC must likewise be revised or withdrawn.

It is time to remove law enforcement from doctors’ offices, and return the practice of pain medicine to those with actual training and hands-on experience working with people in pain. 

Richard “Red” Lawhern, PhD, is a subject matter expert in public policy for regulation of prescription opioids and of clinicians who employ them on behalf of patients. Dr. Lawhern is a regular contributor to Pain News Network.

Medical Cannabis Helps Pain Patients Stop or Reduce Use of Opioids

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

A large new survey of medical marijuana users found that many who have chronic pain were able to reduce or even stop their use of opioid pain medication. The survey also found that pain patients reported less pain and better physical and social functioning once they started using medical cannabis.

Researchers at Emerald Coast Research and Florida State University College of Medicine surveyed 2,183 people recruited from marijuana dispensaries in Florida. Participants had a range of health problems, including chronic pain, anxiety, depression, insomnia and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).  Most were using medical cannabis daily.

Answers to the 66-question online survey revealed that nine out of ten participants found medical cannabis to be very or extremely helpful in treating their medical conditions.

Most (61%) reported using opioid pain medication prior to medical cannabis. Of those, 79 percent reported either stopping (42%) or reducing (37%) their use of prescription opioids. A small number were also able to stop using psychiatric medications for anxiety, depression and PTSD.

“The majority of Florida medical cannabis users surveyed described medical cannabis as helpful and important to their overall quality of life. Notably, a large percentage of patients reported improvements in the areas of physical functioning, social functioning, and bodily pain after beginning medical cannabis,” wrote lead author Carolyn Pritchett, PhD, founder of Emerald Coast Research.

“We also found a substantial number of patients reduced the amount of OBPM (opioid-based pain medications) used after gaining access to legalized medical cannabis, with some patients specifically describing improved functioning in daily life as a result.”

The survey findings, published in the journal Substance Use and Misuse, lend credence to previous studies suggesting that legalization of cannabis leads to fewer prescriptions for opioids and other medications.

A recent study by researchers at Cornell University found that legalization of recreational marijuana in 11 states significantly reduced prescribing for Medicaid patients for a broad range of medications used to treat pain depression, anxiety, seizures and other health conditions.

A 2021 study of chronic pain patients being treated at medical cannabis clinics also found that most were able to stop or reduce their use of opioids. Almost half (48%) reported a significant decrease in pain, and most said they had better quality of life (87%) and better physical function (80%) while using medical cannabis.

A 2021 Harris Poll found that twice as many Americans are using cannabis or CBD to manage their pain than opioid medication.

Medical Gaslighting of Woman for Being of 'Childbearing Age' Goes Viral

By Madora Pennington, PNN Columnist

After seeing a neurologist earlier this month for cluster headaches, Tara Rule’s doctor walked her to the front desk. She thanked him. Then, in her car, she burst into tears. Instead of treating her pain, the doctor turned the appointment into a lecture about a hypothetical pregnancy that she didn't want. He had made her feel so horrible, she wanted to die.

“I can’t keep living in world where it is a game to them,” she said to herself.

Feeling hopeless and alone, Rule pulled out her cellphone and, tears streaming down her face, recorded a video recounting what had just happened and how she felt about it.

It is rare to actually see the raw, visceral reaction to medical gaslighting, and how it affects someone’s self-worth and mental health. Many patients leave such appointments doubting themselves, often becoming unwilling to seek medical care as the medical traumas add up.

Rule, 31, is already on disability from a lifetime of complex medical problems, including Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS), a connective tissue disorder.

When she realized her appointment at a Glen Falls, New York hospital was going sideways, she reached into her bag and began an audio recording with her cellphone. New York allows single party consent to recording, so she didn't need to have the doctor’s permission.

Rule was trying to keep it together, despite her intense pain from debilitating headaches. She wanted the recording so she could sort out what happened later. She wanted to make sure her PTSD from past medical trauma was not triggering her, possibly causing her to misunderstand the doctor.

TARA RULE

In the recording, Rule’s neurologist said he would not give her a certain medication to treat her headache. His reason? She could get pregnant and that particular drug — which he did not name — can cause birth defects. So he doesn't prescribe it to women of "childbearing age."

Rule pushed back, pointing out she is already on a medication for an autoimmune condition that can cause birth defects and miscarriages. And because EDS is a genetic disorder, she does not want to have a child and risk passing it on. Plus, a pregnancy could be harmful for her health.

Instead of making the appointment about Rule's pain and her need for treatment, she says the doctor asked her intrusive questions about her sex life. He disregarded the medical information she provided and patronizingly suggested she might change her mind if she were pregnant. He also insisted her sexual partner would have to consent to her being treated with the unnamed drug.

Rule posted her anguished video on TikTok, and it soon went viral. She's received countless messages from others who have been through similar encounters. While it made her feel less alone, it saddened Rule deeply to learn how many people have stories like hers. The media took notice with articles on Jezebel and in the Albany Times Union.

Severe headaches and cranio-cervical pain are commonly seen in people with EDS, an inherited failure of the body to produce strong collagen. Rule has suffered from migraines since she got a concussion at age eight. Her cluster headaches started in 2016.

“They are a whole different beast,” she told me. “The pain is indescribable. It doesn’t let up. It won’t go away.” Rule says she is a happy person who is not suicidal, but pain like that makes you wish you weren’t alive.

Rather than treat the suffering patient in front of him, the neurologist prioritized a hypothetical situation, in which Rule's birth control fails and she winds up pregnant. For him, this fantasy scenario was more important than giving her the best medical option for pain relief.

Rule complained to the hospital, which apologized and began an investigation. She also created a petition to end doctors' ability to deny treatment to women because they might get pregnant. So far, over 25,000 people have signed it, making it one of the most popular petitions on Change.org.

“As a living, breathing human being who exists, I feel it is absurd that doctors who are expected to provide the best, most effective care and treatments to their patients are able to deny effective treatments due to the potential for birth defects in patients of child bearing age who are not currently pregnant,” she wrote in the petition. 

The week after her botched meeting with the neurologist, Rule found herself in throes of horrendous head pain and took herself to urgent care. She was receiving an IV and oxygen when a group of doctors and security personnel marched into her room. She panicked, thinking of when she was told she had lesions on her brain. Were these people coming to give her bad news like that?

No, the staff was not here to provide medical services. They had come to discharge her. The hospital Rule had complained to apparently called other clinics in the area about her. The urgent care personnel accused her of livestreaming the appointment with her neurologist, which she did not. Nonetheless, they wanted her out immediately. She tried to give the desk her new insurance information as she left, but the staff had closed the window and simply stared at her.

“Shouldn’t they be putting that doctor on leave rather than track my social media and call hospitals? It’s scary,” she told PNN.

Now Rule is afraid to seek medical care. Most of the facilities in her area are owned by that hospital system. Her primary care doctor is part of it. She is not sure if any of them will see her.

“I’m on disability. I have no money. Am I going to have to move?” she wonders.

Madora Pennington is the author of the blog LessFlexible.com about her life with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome. She graduated from UC Berkeley with minors in Journalism and Disability Studies. 

Justin Brown: A CRPS Story of Hope

By Miles Ryan Fisher

When Justin Brown took his first steps at the age of 40, his parents were overcome with joy. Only, it wasn’t the same joy that they’d experienced when he’d taken his first baby steps.  No, this joy came with great pain — the kind of pain that comes with watching one’s child lose nearly half his life to a debilitating condition called Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, also known as “the suicide disease.”

In 2006, just as Justin prepared to enter the working world as a Penn State graduate, he started losing weight. He began regurgitating his meals, vomiting most of whatever he ate. Over time, he grew gaunt. His face sunk and his cheekbones protruded. His skin wrapped around his body until he looked emaciated.

Doctors didn’t have answers. When Justin reached the point that he couldn’t hold down any food, they inserted a J-tube — a feeding tube — in him so that food could bypass his stomach. But it wasn’t his stomach that was the problem. It was the parasite they hadn’t tested for — the one dwelling in his intestine right where the tube was inserted. When they removed the J-tube, they accidentally left a part of it in him.

When Justin awoke from surgery, he awoke to something even more unbearable. Something hellish. The operation triggered a pain that spread through his entire body and left him incapacitated, even after the parasite and tube remnant were removed. At the age of 26, Justin no longer had the strength to walk, not even to the bathroom.

Since 2007, he lay in a hospital bed in the middle of his parents’ living room in Fort Washington, Pennsylvania, his arms at his sides, his head always facing the same direction. In order to subdue the pain that incapacitates him, Justin takes a daily mixture of heavy pain medication, including narcotics.

It took many years until Justin and his family found a doctor who offered an accurate diagnosis: Complex Regional Pain Syndrome or CRPS. Only, the doctor didn’t call it that. Back then, the condition was known as Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy or RSD.  

CRPS/RSD happens when an injury — as minor as a broken finger or as major as surgery — triggers a pain so severe that it is, according to the McGill Pain Index, worse than than amputation. The pain typically remains in the region of the injury, usually involving a limb. But in Justin’s case, it spread through his entire body.

“A lot of people feel like their skin or their nerves are burning, but for me it feels like my bones are being crushed,” Justin says. “If I took my worst pain before CRPS, that would be like a 1 out of 10 compared to my pain now. You really can’t describe it.”

The pain that he’s bravely battled for 17 years has been excruciating and constant. With no end. And no cure.

“It’s there 24/7, and you don’t know when it’s going to go away or if it’s going to go away,” Justin says. “But I had two choices. One was to completely quit. And the other was to keep going and hope that it’ll get better.”

Finding Hope

But now, Justin is finally getting part of his life back through a form of non-allopathic (without drugs or surgery) treatment offered at the Spero Clinic in Fayetteville, Arkansas.

The clinic, which has over 40 employees and treats hundreds of patients every year, was founded in 2012 by Dr. Katinka van der Merwe. Born in South Africa, van der Merwe immigrated to the United States in 1994 and earned her Doctor of Chiropractic degree with the intent of using it to treat individuals who suffer from CRPS and other chronic pain conditions. .

Her clinic’s approach involves treating the vagus nerve, which is the longest and most complex of the body’s 12 cranial nerves. Individuals who suffer from chronic neurologic disorders often have an underactive vagus nerve, which causes inflammation that is either localized or, as in Justin’s case, envelops the entire body. It’s this inflammation that can cause excruciating pain.

“My philosophy and belief is that the body is incredibly intelligent and can heal from the inside out,” van der Merwe says. “People don’t come here to get a diagnosis and medication — they come here to have their bodies rehabilitated.”

The clinic approaches pain treatment in a holistic and noninvasive way, using a variety of therapies and tools involving electrical, physical and auditory/visual/sensory stimulation. It’s the clinic’s range of therapies that helps correct the nervous system and – hopefully -- puts the patient’s pain in remission.

“It’s a completely different approach to everything that I’ve tried so far,” Justin says. This has included the most radical of forms, such as being placed in a ketamine-induced coma in Mexico and brought out of it with the hope that his nerves would essentially reset. Some CRPS patients have found relief with ketamine infusions, but it didn’t work for Justin.

It was last March that Justin began treatment at the Spero Clinic. As soon as the first week ended, Justin experienced progress. It began with his ability to move his hands. Then the next week, he stood up. On the third week, he walked for the first time in 15 years.

Every week after that has brought similar victories — small to a healthy person, but momentous for Justin. Regaining his ability to drink a Gatorade. Regaining his ability to curl two-pound weights. Regaining his ability to wear clothing that fits him, rather than clothing so loose as to not press against his body and cause him a great deal of pain.

“Before I got here, the most I could take were fifteen steps,” Justin says. “And they weren’t good steps. I’d just drag my feet on the ground. Now I walk from my hotel room down a couple hallways, through the center of the hotel, and outside.”

Every incremental gain helps Justin continue to grind. Unlike most patients, who require two or three months of treatment, Justin will need at least half a year because of how severe his CRPS is.

Fundraising Help

The cost of every week of treatment — about $3,000 — is typically not covered by insurance, which does not make it any easier on Justin or his family. If anyone knows this, it’s Philip Robert, one of the Spero Clinic’s CRPS patients in 2016.

Robert spent ten weeks at the clinic and found his recovery so miraculous that he was inspired to form the Burning Limb Foundation, a non-profit whose mission is to raise funds to provide financial assistance to people with CRPS, primarily for treatment at the Spero Clinic. What makes the foundation different from most other non-profits is that 100% of the donations it receives are applied to treatment costs. And unlike other fundraising platforms like GoFundMe, donors are then able to write it off as a charitable gift on their tax returns.

“The idea is to get (CRPS patients) started — get them seed money — so that they can then do a fundraising campaign in the nonprofit world,” Robert says. “We provide a platform in which families can utilize their resources—their network of friends and family—who may be willing to give a little bit more.”

It’s through the Burning Limb Foundation that Justin has received much-needed financial support from family, friends and even people who have never met him but want to play a role in his recovery.

It’s that recovery that Justin realizes is so important, not only to live a life free of pain, but also to inspire others like him who suffer from CRPS. While not cured of the disease, he hopes his remission can bring hope to others.

“If it can work for me, it can work for anybody,” Justin says. “It’s not guaranteed to work for everybody, but it can work for anybody.” 

Miles Ryan Fisher is the Assistant Director of the Building Trades National Medical Screening Program and also serves on the advisory board for Columbia Lighthouse for the Blind. His articles have appeared in the Washington Post, Philadelphia Inquirer, Washingtonian Magazine, Motherly, and Go World Travel.

Hemp-Derived Delta-8 Raises Health Concerns

By Eric Berger, Kaiser Health News

Suzan Kennedy has smoked marijuana, and says her Wisconsin roots mean she can handle booze, so she was not concerned earlier this year when a bartender in St. Paul, Minnesota, described a cocktail with the cannabinoid delta-8 THC as “a little bit potent.”

Hours after enjoying the tasty drink and the silliness that reminded Kennedy of a high from weed, she said, she started to feel “really shaky and faint” before collapsing in her friend’s arms. Kennedy regained consciousness and recovered, but her distaste for delta-8 remains, even though the substance is legal at the federal level, unlike marijuana.

“I’m not one to really tell people what to do,” said Kennedy, 35, who lives in Milwaukee and works in software sales. But if a friend tried to order a delta-8 drink, “I would tell them, ‘Absolutely not. You’re not putting that in your body.’”

The FDA and some marijuana industry experts share Kennedy’s concerns. At least a dozen states have banned the hemp-derived drug, including Colorado, Montana, New York, and Oregon, which have legalized marijuana. But delta-8 manufacturers call the concerns unfounded and say they’re driven by marijuana businesses trying to protect their market share.

So what is the difference? The flower of the marijuana plant, oil derived from it, and edibles made from those contain delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol, the substance that produces the drug’s high, and can be legally sold only at dispensaries in states that have legalized marijuana.

Similar products that contain delta-8 THC are sold online and at bars and retailers across much of the U.S., including some places where pot remains illegal. That’s because a 2018 federal law legalized hemp, a variety of the cannabis plant. Hemp isn’t allowed to contain more than 0.3% of the psychotropic delta-9 THC found in marijuana.

Delta-8 Contaminants

The concerns about delta-8 are largely focused on how it’s made. Delta-8 is typically produced by dissolving CBD — a compound found in cannabis plants — in solvents, such as toluene that is often found in paint thinner. Some people in the marijuana industry say that process leaves potentially harmful residue. A study published in the journal Chemical Research in Toxicology last year found lead, mercury, and silicon in delta-8 electronic cigarettes.

The FDA has issued warnings about the “serious health risks” of delta-8, citing concerns about the conversion process, and has received more than 100 reports of people hallucinating, vomiting, and losing consciousness, among other issues, after consuming it. From January 2021 through this February, national poison control centers received more than 2,300 delta-8 cases, 70% of which required the users to be evaluated at health care facilities, according to the FDA.

Delta-8 is “just the obvious solution to people who want to have access to cannabis but live in a state where it’s illegal,” said Dr. Peter Grinspoon, a primary care physician at Massachusetts General Hospital and a longtime medical cannabis provider. “You can either get in a lot of trouble buying cannabis, or you can get delta-8.”

Grinspoon described delta-8 as about half as potent as marijuana. But because of the lack of research into delta-8’s possible benefits and the absence of regulation, he would not recommend his patients use it. If it were regulated like Massachusetts’ medical and recreational marijuana programs, he said, harmful contaminants could be flagged or removed.

‘Incredible Potential as Therapeutic’

Christopher Hudalla, chief scientific officer at ProVerde Laboratories, a Massachusetts marijuana and hemp testing company, said he has examined thousands of delta-8 products and all contained contaminants that could be harmful to consumers’ health.

Delta-8 has “incredible potential as a therapeutic” because it has many of the same benefits as marijuana, minus some of the intoxication, said Hudalla. “But delta-8, like unicorns, doesn’t exist. What does exist in the market is synthetic mixtures of unknown garbage.”

Justin Journay, owner of the delta-8 brand 3Chi, is skeptical of the concerns about the products. He started the company in 2018 after hemp oil provided relief for his shoulder pain. He soon started wondering what other cannabinoids in hemp could do. “‘There’s got to be some gold in those hills,’” Journay recalled thinking. He said his Indiana-based company now has more than 300 employees and sponsors a NASCAR team.

When asked about the FDA’s reports of bad reactions, Journay said: “There are risks with THC. There absolutely are. There are risks with cheeseburgers.”

He attributes the side effects to taking too much. “We say, ‘Start low.’ You can always take more,” Journay said.

Journay said that he understands concerns about contaminants in delta-8 products and that his company was conducting tests to identify the tiny portion of substances that remain unknown, which he asserts are cannabinoids from the plant.

An analysis of 3Chi delta-8 oil conducted by Hudalla’s firm last year and posted on 3Chi’s website found multiple unidentified compounds that “do not occur naturally” and thus “would not be recommended for human consumption.” Delta-8 oil is still sold on 3Chi’s site.

Journay said the analysis found that only 0.4% of the oil contained unknown compounds. “How can they then definitively say that compound isn’t natural when they don’t even know what it is?” he said in an email.

“The vast majority of negative information out there and the push to make delta-8 illegal is coming from the marijuana industries,” Journay said. “It’s cutting into their profit margins, which is funny that the marijuana guys would all of a sudden be for prohibition.”

Delta-8 products do appear to be significantly cheaper than weed. For example, Curaleaf, one of the world’s largest cannabis companies, offers packages of gummies that contain 100 milligrams of delta-9 THC for $25, plus sales tax, at a Massachusetts dispensary. At 3Chi, gummies with 400 milligrams of delta-8 cost $29.99 online, with no tax.

Journay’s criticism of the marijuana industry holds some truth, said Chris Lindsey, government relations director for the Marijuana Policy Project, which advocates for legalization of marijuana for adults.

“We see this happen in every single adult-use legalization state,” said Lindsey. “Their established medical cannabis industry will sometimes be your loudest opponents, and that’s a business thing. That’s not a marijuana thing.”

Still, the bans might not be working fully. In New York, which banned delta-8 in 2021, Lindsey said, it’s available at any bodega.

“In an environment where whole-plant cannabis is legally available, there would be little to no demand for these alternative products.”

— Paul Armentano, NORML

In July, Minnesota implemented a law that limits the amount of THC, including delta-8, allowed in hemp products outside of its medical marijuana program. News reports said the law would wipe out delta-8. But the state cannot “control what’s being sold over the internet outside of Minnesota and shipped in,” said Maren Schroeder, policy director for Sensible Change Minnesota, which aims to legalize recreational cannabis for adults.

Max Barber, a writer and editor in Minneapolis, remains interested in delta-8 despite his state’s restrictions. Even though he could likely obtain a medical marijuana prescription because he has an anxiety disorder and chronic sleep problems, he hasn’t pursued it because pot made his anxiety worse. He used CBD oil but found the effects inconsistent. In March 2021, he tried a 10-milligram delta-8 gummy.

“It got me pretty high, which I don’t enjoy,” he said.

Then he found what he considers the right dosage for him: one-third of a gummy, which he takes in the evening. He said he now gets between six and eight hours of sleep each night, has less anxiety, and is better able to focus. “I have become kind of an evangelist for delta-8 for everyone I know who has sleep problems,” said Barber, who bought enough gummies to last for months after the new law went into effect.

To address concerns about delta-8, the federal government should regulate it and make accessing cannabis easier for consumers, said Paul Armentano, deputy director of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws.

He pointed to a recent study in the International Journal of Drug Policy showing that the number of Google searches for delta-8 in the U.S. soared in 2021 and that interest was especially high in states that restricted cannabis use. “In an environment where whole-plant cannabis is legally available, there would be little to no demand for these alternative products,” said Armentano.

Lindsey, of the Marijuana Policy Project, isn’t so sure that would matter. When he first learned of delta-8’s growing popularity in 2021, he thought it would go the way of drugs like K2 or Spice that he said fall between the regulatory rules long enough to get on shelves before eventually getting shut down.

“That didn’t materialize,” said Lindsey. “The more that we understand about that plant, the more of these different cannabinoids are going to come out.” And that, he said, will in turn spur interest from consumers and businesses.

Kaiser Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues.

My Story: Hospitals Are Undertreating Pain

By Michael Swift, Guest Columnist

Right now, as I type this, I can barely finish because I just got home from a surgery in my abdominal area. I won't get into the details, but a lot of cutting was done, and I was discharged after an agonizing hospital stay. I was given Tylenol and Naproxen for post-surgical pain.

I am now reclined in bed at home and suffering from post-op pain because a major hospital in a city of a quarter million people is undertreating pain. This is the new norm for most hospitals here in Texas.

My wife and I lived in beautiful central Oregon all our lives. We ended up vacating the house we rented and could find no place to live in the entire state that was affordable to us. For family reasons, we moved to the Texas Panhandle.

My wife, seeking a new pain specialist in Amarillo, was denied and bawled-out two times by doctors. She was told by one verbatim: “We don't push dope here. If you want drugs, go to the north side of town."

I almost walked back in after she told me what this doctor had said to her, to punch him in the mouth. But it would do no good trying to help her from a jail cell. She was visibly upset, in tears, humiliated and so hurt. She is a 67-year-old senior with spinal stenosis and a bone disease that is destroying her vertebral column. Even with stellar remarks by her former providers as a "model patient with legitimate pain,” she was still an object for these millennial brats to verbally spit upon.

When living back in Oregon, my wife and I had a wonderful provider in Bend and our lives were fully active. We failed however to do our homework before moving to Texas. When we arrived, we realized that the Texas Medical Board and certain medical groups and doctors decided they wanted to solve the huge drug abuse problem.

The real problem here has been massive amounts of illicit fentanyl, comprising about 75% of overdose deaths, along with heroin, ecstasy and many other street drugs pushed in by the Sinaloa drug cartel. Nevertheless, the medical board went after the doctors and patients because it was easier than addressing the real problem.

A Broken Healthcare System

To say the least, I am saddened, upset and feeling a huge weight of condemnation from individuals here in the medical field. What a broken and detached healthcare system.

We are both leaving Texas for a nearby state, already set up with a new provider there, who is willing to take a good look at her without judgement. I am not leaving though, until I file a complaint against both pain management providers for their unethical, cruel treatment and libelous slander -- with the use of profanity to my wife's face -- all confirmed by the nurse in the exam room.

I will also file a complaint with the Texas Medical Board for the experience I had as a surgery patient. It will fall on deaf ears, but I won't stop until I get a response. To those of you out there who are also suffering and abandoned, take any and EVERY measure available to control your pain, which is robbing you of your life. You have no other choice.

There is a terrible and frightening experience awaiting those who are destined to go under the knife in hospitals that have overreacted to the "opioid crisis” by implementing a new policy of completely abstaining from administering any narcotic pain medication to post-surgical patients.

I suppose I could have screamed at the top of my lungs to demand pain relief, but who wants that on their record. Or worse, to be blacklisted. Thank God I have an alternate source of pain relief, but I am still astounded.

I am a veteran of nine prior surgeries, all of them done over 20 years ago. When I was in the hospital after those surgeries, I was asked by a nurse what narcotic I wanted to choose for pain relief. After that, I stayed healthy, avoided more surgeries and interpreted the many stories I heard about "Tylenol for post-op pain" as nothing but false tales and fear-mongering.

To all and any of you who posted such statements, I sincerely apologize. You were telling the truth.

Michael Swift lives with degenerative disc disease, arthritis and severe migraines.

Do you have a “My Story” to share? Pain News Network invites other readers to share their experiences about living with pain and treating it.

Send your stories to editor@painnewsnetwork.org

Virtual Reality Therapy Reduces Drug Use During Surgery

By Madora Pennington, PNN Columnist

Imagine going in for minor surgery, one where you don’t need to be totally unconscious, and being given a virtual reality headset for pain and anxiety relief instead of the usual dose of anesthesia.

The virtual reality (VR) device would distract you during surgery by immersing you in a nature scene, like a forest, mountain top or nighttime sky. And a guide meditation would reassure you with, “Surgery is going great! Try to stay still!”

Would this even work?

A small study led by researchers at the University of Colorado sought to find out by looking at 34 patients receiving hand surgery that could be done without general anesthesia. While virtual reality has been widely studied as a treatment for acute and chronic pain, researchers are just beginning to explore whether it can be used during surgery.

“In the field of anesthesia, we are constantly focused on improving patient safety and care quality,” said lead author Adeel Faruki, MD, an anesthesiologist at the University of Colorado Hospital. “There are many studies currently underway assessing if VR can be used for orthopedic joint surgeries.”

Faruki and his colleagues divided the patients into two groups. Half received the usual care and served as a control group, while the other half wore VR headsets and noise-cancelling headphones during surgery to promote relaxation and calmness. Both groups received local anesthesia and the sedative propofol, either upon patient request or at the discretion of an anesthesiologist.

Researchers found that patients in the VR group received significantly less propofol than those in the control group. Only four of the 17 patients in the VR group received any propofol during their surgery, while every patient in the control group received the sedative.

PLOS ONE

Not surprisingly, the VR patients tended to need more supplemental local anesthesia. Propofol can amplify the effectiveness of pain medication, so patients on propofol generally require less numbing and pain relief.

Patients in both groups reported their pain was well-controlled and they felt relaxed during surgery. There were no significant differences in their pain scores or surgery outcomes. In short, the VR group did just as well with the pleasant distraction of the device as those receiving more sedating medication.

There are advantages to using less propofol. The drug is commonly used as sedative during surgery, but poses risks because it tends to depress breathing, which is dangerous. “Acute propofol intoxication" was cited as the cause of pop star Michael Jackson’s overdose death in 2009.

Propofol is also hard on the brain and may cause lower cognition after surgery.  Being less drugged, patients who received VR were discharged from the postoperative recovery room an average of 22 minutes earlier than fully medicated patients. Getting patients released early frees hospital staff and resources for other patients and needs.

Some limitations the authors of the study acknowledge are that patients signing up for VR might be more likely to do well with less anesthesia if they volunteered for it. Neither the patients nor the healthcare providers were “blinded” in this study, meaning everyone knew which patients were getting VR and which ones weren’t. This scenario opens the possibility that providers participating in the study might inadvertently influence the results by giving the VR patients less propofol.

The bottom line for this study, which is being published in PLOS ONE, is that patients can have just as comfortable a surgery with less sedation when VR is used. The study does not prove that VR is better, just that it does as well as sedative medication.

Madora Pennington is the author of the blog LessFlexible.com about her life with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome. Madora has tried virtual reality therapy and found it useful in reducing both pain and anxiety.  

Gabapentin Raises Risk of Delirium in Older Surgery Patients

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

It’s become trendy in recent years for U.S. hospitals to use gabapentin (Neurontin) as a “safer” alternative to opioids for post-operative pain.  But a large new study has found that gabapentin increases the risk of delirium and other adverse health effects in older patients recovering from surgery.

The study, published in JAMA Internal Medicine, looked at nearly a million patients over the age of 65 who had major surgical procedures, including cardiac, orthopedic and gastrointestinal surgeries. About 12% of the patients received gabapentin and other analgesics for perioperative pain management between the day of surgery and two days after surgery.

Researchers found that gabapentin “modestly increased” the risk of delirium, a mental state in which a person becomes confused, disoriented and unable to think or remember clearly. Patients who received gabapentin were also more likely to be prescribed antidepressants and other anti-psychotic drugs, and to develop pneumonia.

“Considering the increasing number of major surgeries performed in older adults, and the negative consequences of perioperative delirium, our findings raise concern about an increasingly adopted clinical practice that involves routine use of gabapentin as part of multimodal analgesia,” wrote lead author Dae Hyun Kim, MD, a geriatrician and epidemiologist at Brigham and Women's Hospital and Assistant Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School.

“On the basis of these findings and those of meta-analyses of RCTs (randomized controlled trials) showing a weak opioid-sparing effect of gabapentin, clinicians should reconsider routine use of gabapentin for perioperative pain management among older adults and individualize the treatment decision after assessing the risk of immediate harms vs opioid-sparing benefits of perioperative gabapentin use.”

‘Windfall Medication’

Although gabapentin is an anti-convulsant that was originally developed to treat epilepsy, it is increasingly prescribed “off-label” to treat various types of pain. In 2016, the American Pain Society recommended that gabapentin be used “around the clock” for post-operative pain because it lowered pain scores and reduced the use of opioids. But studies later found the drug was ineffective for post-operative pain and actually increased the risk of an overdose.

An editorial published in JAMA Internal Medicine said the new study demonstrates that the risks of gabapentin outweigh its potential benefits in older patients.

“These results are consistent with what is now a growing body of literature suggesting that gabapentin may not be the windfall medication for perioperative pain management that surgeons hoped it might be for decreasing opioid use. The adverse events reported in this study (delirium, antipsychotic use, and pneumonia) add to similar findings that gabapentin, especially when used concomitantly with opioids, increases the risk of postoperative sedation and dizziness,” wrote lead author Zachary Marcum, PharmD, University of Washington School of Pharmacy.  

“As the use of gabapentin continues to rise, it is critically important clinicians understand its risks, especially for older adults. Poorly controlled postoperative pain is associated with several complications, including cognitive impairment, delirium, depression, decreased mobility, and longer recovery.”

It’s a common misconception that patients often become addicted to opioids after surgery. A 2016 Canadian study found that long term opioid use after surgery is rare, with only 0.4% of older adults still taking opioids a year after major elective surgery. A 2018 study at Harvard Medical School had similar findings. Only 0.6% of patients who were prescribed opioids for post-operative pain were later diagnosed with opioid dependence, abuse or a non-fatal overdose.

Supreme Court Ruling Gives Hope to Doctors Facing Opioid Charges

By Brett Kelman, Kaiser Health News

Dr. Nelson Onaro conceded last summer that he’d written prescriptions illegally, although he said he was thinking only of his patients. From a tiny, brick clinic in Oklahoma, he doled out hundreds of opioid pills and dozens of fentanyl patches in a way that was "outside the usual course of professional practice."

“Those medications were prescribed to help my patients, from my own point of view,” Onaro said in court, as he reluctantly pleaded guilty to six counts of drug dealing. Because he confessed, the doctor was likely to get a reduced sentence of three years or less in prison.

But Onaro changed his mind in July. In the days before his sentencing, he asked a federal judge to throw out his plea deal, sending his case toward a trial. For a chance at exoneration, he’d face four times the charges and the possibility of a harsher sentence.

Why take the risk? A Supreme Court ruling has raised the bar to convict in a case like Onaro’s. In a June decision, the court said prosecutors must not only prove a prescription was not medically justified ― possibly because it was too large or dangerous, or simply unnecessary ― but also that the prescriber knew as much.

Suddenly, Onaro’s state of mind carries more weight in court. Prosecutors have not opposed the doctor withdrawing his plea to most of his charges, conceding in a court filing that he faces “a different legal calculus” after the Supreme Court decision.

The court’s unanimous ruling complicates the Department of Justice’s ongoing efforts to hold prescribers criminally liable for fueling the opioid crisis. Previously, lower courts had not considered a prescriber’s intention. Until now, doctors on trial largely could not defend themselves by arguing they were acting in good faith when they wrote bad prescriptions. Now they can, attorneys say, although it is not necessarily a get-out-of-jail-free card.

“Essentially, the doctors were handcuffed,” said Zach Enlow, Onaro’s attorney. “Now they can take off their handcuffs. But it doesn’t mean they are going to win the fight.”

The Supreme Court’s decision in Ruan v. United States, issued June 27, was overshadowed by the nation-shaking controversy ignited three days earlier, when the court erased federal abortion rights. But the lesser-known ruling is now quietly percolating through federal courthouses, where it has emboldened defendants in opioid prescribing cases and may have a chilling effect on future prosecutions of doctors under the Controlled Substances Act.

In the three months since it was issued, the Ruan decision has been invoked in at least 15 ongoing prosecutions across 10 states, according to a KHN review of federal court records. Doctors cited the decision in post-conviction appeals, motions for acquittals, new trials, plea reversals, and a failed attempt to exclude the testimony of a prescribing expert, arguing their opinion was now irrelevant. Other defendants have successfully petitioned to delay their cases so the Ruan decision could be folded into their arguments at upcoming trials or sentencing hearings.

David Rivera, a former Obama-era U.S. attorney who once led prescribing prosecutions in Middle Tennessee, said he believes doctors have a “great chance” of overturning convictions if they were prohibited from arguing a good faith defense or a jury was instructed to ignore one.

Rivera said defendants who ran true pill mills would still be convicted, even if a second trial was ultimately required. But the Supreme Court has extended a “lifeline” to a narrow group of defendants who “dispensed with their heart, not their mind,” he said.

“What the Supreme Court is trying to do is divide between a bad doctor and a person who might have a license to practice medicine but is not acting as a doctor at all and is a drug dealer,” Rivera said. “A doctor who is acting under a sincerely held belief that he is doing the right thing, even if he may be horrible at his job and should not be trusted with human lives ― that’s still not criminal.”

The Ruan decision resulted from the appeals of two doctors, Xiulu Ruan and Shakeel Kahn, who were separately convicted of running pill mills in Alabama and Wyoming, respectively, then sentenced to 21 and 25 years in prison. In both cases, prosecutors relied on a common tactic to show the prescriptions were a crime: Expert witnesses reviewed the defendants’ prescriptions and testified that they were far out of line with what a reasonable doctor would do.

But in writing the opinion of the Supreme Court, then-Justice Stephen Breyer insisted the burden of proof should not be so simple to overcome, remanding both convictions back to the lower courts for reconsideration.

Because doctors are allowed and expected to distribute drugs, Breyer wrote, prosecutors must not only prove they wrote prescriptions with no medical purpose but also that they did so “knowingly or intentionally.” Otherwise, the courts risk punishing “conduct that lies close to, but on the permissible side of, the criminal line,” Breyer wrote.

To defense attorneys, the unanimous ruling sent an unambiguous message.

“This is a hyperpolarized time in America, and particularly on the court,” Enlow said. “And yet this was a 9-0 ruling saying that the mens rea ― or the mental state of the doctor ― it matters.”

Maybe nowhere was the Ruan decision more pressing than in the case of Dr. David Jankowski, a Michigan physician who was on trial when the burden of proof shifted beneath his feet.

Jankowski was convicted of federal drug and fraud crimes and faces 20 years in prison. In an announcement of the verdict, the DOJ said the doctor and his clinic supplied people with “no need for the drugs,” which were “sold on the streets to feed the addictions of opioid addicts.”

Defense attorney Anjali Prasad said the Ruan ruling dropped before jury deliberations in the case but after prosecutors spent weeks presenting the argument that Jankowski’s behavior was not that of a reasonable prescriber — a legal standard that on its own is no longer enough to convict.

Prasad cited the Ruan decision in a motion for a new trial, which was denied, and said she intends to use the decision as a basis for a forthcoming appeal. The attorney also said she is in discussion with two other clients about appealing their convictions with Ruan.

“My hope is that criminal defense attorneys like myself are more emboldened to take their cases to trial and that their clients are 100% ready to fight the feds, which is no easy task,” Prasad said. “We just duke it out in the courtroom. We can prevail that way.”

Some defendants are trying. So far, a few have scored small wins. And at least one suffered a crushing defeat.

In Tennessee, nurse practitioner Jeffrey Young, accused of trading opioids for sex and notoriety for a reality show pilot, successfully delayed his trial from May to November to account for the Ruan decision, arguing it would “drastically alter the landscape of the Government’s war on prescribers.”

Also in Tennessee, Samson Orusa, a doctor and pastor who last year was convicted of handing out opioid prescriptions without examining patients, filed a motion for a new trial based on the Ruan decision, then persuaded a reluctant judge to delay his sentencing for six months to consider it.

And in Ohio, Dr. Martin Escobar cited the Ruan ruling in an eleventh-hour effort to avoid prison.

Escobar in January pleaded guilty to 54 counts of distributing a controlled substance, including prescriptions that caused the deaths of two patients. After the Ruan decision, Escobar tried to withdraw his plea, saying he’d have gone to trial if he’d known prosecutors had to prove his intent.

One week later, on the day Escobar was set to be sentenced, a federal judge denied the motion. His guilty plea remained and Escobar got 25 years.

Kaiser Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues.

The Era of No Diagnosis

By Dr. Forest Tennant, PNN Columnist

Recently I was given a report written by a prestigious professional pain organization proposing that “back pain” should be the only diagnosis assigned to this condition.  They want to do away with any diagnosis like herniated disc, arachnoiditis, sprain, strain or rheumatoid spondylitis.  Their rationale was that pain treatment should be the same for every case of back pain, therefore there is no need to make a causative, underlying diagnosis for each patient. 

To me, their motivation was clear.  It takes training, time, expertise and money to make a correct medical diagnosis, and this group only wanted to treat the symptom of pain.  Or maybe they just want robots to take a pain complaint and exercise a preconceived, no-human touch medical protocol as treatment?

This non-diagnostic proposal goes along with the large number of papers that wish to declare pain a disease rather than a symptom.  Let us be abundantly clear:  Pain, as a symptom, can be part of a disease, syndrome, disorder or condition, but pain itself is not a disease.

Some diseases definitely cause pain. Good common sense medical practice has included, and should continue to include, a search for the basic cause of an individual’s pain. What’s more, the focus should be on treating the cause of pain rather than just treating the symptom of pain. Diagnosis is the process of identifying the cause of illness whether it be a disease, condition or injury.

My recent experience in studying adhesive arachnoiditis (AA) has revealed some pathetic information about the failure of some doctors to make a diagnosis.  In an effort to develop prevention measures and treatment protocols, we surveyed several dozen people who developed AA after an epidural corticosteroid injection or a spinal tap.  In these cases, the individual singularly blamed the development of AA on one of these procedures. 

The amazing statistic, however, is that barely a third of these individuals could give us the diagnosis that prompted a physician to do an epidural injection or spinal tap in the first place.  Spinal taps were usually done in an emergency room, and only about half of these patients could even remember the symptoms that caused the emergency visit.

One-Size-Fits-All Treatment

A great disconnect has developed between primary care physicians, pain clinics and patients.  In most cases today, a person with neck, back or extremity pain will initially consult with their primary care physician. In many cases, the doctor will then refer the patient to the local pain clinic, expecting the clinic to determine a specific causative diagnosis and develop a patient-specific treatment plan. 

That is what usually happens when a primary care doctor refers a patient to an allergist, rheumatologist or cardiologist. The medical specialist makes a diagnosis and develops a patient specific plan that either the specialist or the referring doctor will follow while treating the patient. 

But this rarely happens today when a primary care physician refers a patient to a pain clinic.  Almost never is a specific diagnosis made, but a “one-size-fits-all” pain treatment regimen is initiated.  Or worse, the pain patient is given the diagnosis of “opioid use disorder” and placed on the addiction treatment drug Suboxone, even if they have been successfully maintained for years on opioids with no abuse issues.  The referring physician may never even see the patient again. 

The upshot of this practice is that some pain clinics are treating dozens of bonafide patients without a specific medical diagnosis other than neck, back or leg pain, or “opioid use disorder.”

There are some other unacceptable non-diagnostic scenarios these days.  Severe chronic pain is often caused by a rare obscure disease such as AA or Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome.  Patients will often obtain their unusual disease diagnosis and present it to a physician for care, who declares that he/she doesn’t accept the diagnosis. 

A patient may then dare to ask, “Then what do I have and what is the treatment?”  It’s hard to believe, but some patients are being told, “I don’t accept that diagnosis, but since I don’t have another one, I can’t treat you.”

Another story commonly told these days is the patient who complains about “pain all over” and is prescribed a long list of medications, but doesn’t receive a causative diagnosis.  Some patients have gone to a dozen or more doctors, but not one has rendered a causative diagnosis.

The opioid and COVID epidemics have obscured a lot of positive diagnostic developments that have gone on behind the scenes and which greatly assist in making a causative diagnosis. Improved blood tests for inflammatory and autoimmune markers are now available. Genetic and hormone testing can not only pin down a diagnosis, but also provide a roadmap for treatment.  And contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which distinguishes spinal fluid from solid tissue, has made the specific diagnosis of spinal canal pathologies most accessible.  

Every chronic pain patient not only deserves, but needs a specific medical diagnosis so that the basic cause of their pain can be treated, as well as relieving the symptom of pain.  Without treating the underlying cause of chronic pain, the patient is often doomed to a pained life of diminishing quality until death. 

Modern medicine now has the knowledge and technology to do better.  Why aren’t we?

Forest Tennant, MD, DrPH, is retired from clinical practice but continues his research on the treatment of intractable pain and arachnoiditis through the Tennant Foundation’s Arachnoiditis Research and Education Project and the Intractable Pain Syndrome Research and Education Project.

The Tennant Foundation gives financial support to Pain News Network and sponsors PNN’s Patient Resources section.   

Opioid Prescriptions Down Sharply for Medicare Patients

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

The number of Medicare beneficiaries receiving opioid prescriptions has declined significantly since 2016, according to a new government report that also found steep declines in the number of beneficiaries receiving high doses or who appear to be doctor shopping.

The report by the Department of Health and Human Service’s Office of Inspector General found that over 21 million people -- 23% of Medicare Part D beneficiaries -- received at least one opioid prescription in 2021, down from 33% of beneficiaries in 2016. Over 51 million people are currently enrolled in Part D.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) adopted new safety rules in 2018 that discourage high dose prescribing and limit the initial supply of opioids to 7 days. The rules also allowed pharmacists and insurers to flag Medicare patients deemed to be at high risk, as well as their prescribers.

The rules appear to have had a major impact on prescribing. In 2016, over half a million Medicare beneficiaries received a daily opioid dose of at least 120 MED (morphine milligram equivalent). By 2021, that fell to less than 200,000 patients, a 60 percent decrease in high dose prescribing.   

MEDICARE PATIENTS RECEIVING HIGH DOSE OPIOIDS

HHS Office of Inspector General

Since 2016, the number of Medicare beneficiaries who appeared to be doctor shopping dropped from 22,300 to 1,800; while the number of doctors with “questionable” prescribing patterns fell from 401 to just 98.  Patients were flagged for doctor shopping if they were on high doses and received opioids from four or more prescribers or four or more pharmacists.

“The opioid epidemic continues to grip the nation. There is clearly still cause for concern and vigilance, even as some positive trends emerge,” the OIG report found. “The number of Medicare Part D beneficiaries who received opioids in 2021 decreased to approximately a quarter of a million beneficiaries, extending a downward trend from prior years. Further, fewer Part D beneficiaries were identified as receiving high amounts of opioids or at serious risk of misuse or overdose. The number of prescribers ordering opioids for large numbers of beneficiaries at serious risk was steady.”

But there is little evidence that less prescribing is reducing addiction and overdoses.  The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates there were nearly 81,000 opioid-related deaths in 2021, nearly twice the number reported in 2016, when the CDC’s opioid guideline was released. The vast majority of deaths involved illicit fentanyl and other street drugs, not prescription opioids.

The OIG report found that 50,391 Part D beneficiaries experienced an opioid overdose (either fatal or non-fatal) in 2021, but did not break down how many were linked to illicit or prescription opioids.

Over one million Medicare beneficiaries were diagnosed with opioid use disorder (OUD) last year, but only one in five received a medication like Suboxone or methadone to treat their condition. Medicare patients were far more likely to receive naloxone, an overdose reversal drug. Over 445,000 beneficiaries received a prescription for naloxone, an 18% increase from 2020.

Accepting Our Limits

By Victoria Reed, PNN Columnist

The end of summer is approaching. While it’s been a busy one for me, with a move to a new city and lots of gardening and camping, I realized that there was one thing that I had yet to do. I wanted to go to an amusement park.

Every summer as a child, my parents took me and my siblings to Cedar Point in Ohio, where we would ride the kiddy rides, play games for cheap prizes and eat the worst possible amusement park food! It was a time when there seemed to be less things to worry about, and the days seemed to stretch on forever. Those trips were always the highlight of my summer! 

Then as an older teen and young adult, I would return to Cedar Point with my sisters, friends or boyfriends to ride the newer and bigger roller coasters. I had no problems navigating the park on foot. We would walk for hours and spend a fair amount of time standing in long lines to ride the latest thrill rides. Sure, my feet were a little sore by end of the night, but it was well worth it, considering the fun I had.

Recently, as I was fondly remembering those days of my youth, I made a suggestion to my husband that we go back. We had never gone to an amusement park together and figured it would be a nice ending to an otherwise great summer. He agreed, so I went online to reserve our tickets for a day that we figured would be a slow one. It was a school day, so we presumed that the crowds would be smaller. In addition, the weather forecast called for sunshine and warm temperatures.

Once I secured our tickets, my body reminded me that I am no longer a “spring chicken” and that maybe I should reconsider how I expected to walk all day with sore joints, muscle aches and terrible fatigue. My fibromyalgia and RA weren’t going to make this as easy as it had been in the past.

Over the next few days, I tossed around the idea that I might need some assistance to be able to enjoy our day at Cedar Point. On the park’s website, I had seen that wheelchairs were available for daily rental. At the time, I disregarded that information, preferring to pretend that I wouldn’t need anything such as that. After all, I had run on my high school track team and was one of the best sprinters. Why would I need a wheelchair to enjoy an amusement park?

When I look in the mirror, I still see that 18-year-old athlete who is at the peak of her physical shape...

Not!!

Eventually, I came to my senses and went back online to reserve an electric wheelchair “just in case.” I figured I would just park it, and if I got too tired, it would be there for me to use. It was then that I realized that I must accept my limitations.

Did I want to be seen in a wheelchair? Absolutely not! Having to use a wheelchair does things to your pride and your ego. No one wants to have to use assistive devices, but sometimes we have to and accept the fact that we aren’t as able-bodied as we used to be. It’s not a shameful thing, and we shouldn’t be embarrassed by our needs.

It turned out that renting that wheelchair was a good decision, because it allowed me to enjoy the park a whole lot more than if I had to walk the entire day. My husband’s Fitbit recorded over eight miles of walking that day! There was no way I could have done that amount of walking on what turned out to be a very hot and crowded day. If I had tried, there’s no doubt that it would’ve put me in a bad flare.

Unfortunately, as you get older, your body becomes limited in what it can tolerate. Living with chronic pain and fatigue will increase your limits even more. It’s important to recognize that and make changes accordingly. Accepting our limitations, instead of fighting them, will make our lives easier and more enjoyable.

Victoria Reed lives in northeast Ohio. She suffers from endometriosis, fibromyalgia, degenerative disc disease and rheumatoid arthritis. 

Seniors Missing Out on Billions of Dollars in Benefits

By Judith Graham, Kaiser Health News

Millions of older adults are having trouble making ends meet, especially during these inflationary times. Yet many don’t realize help is available, and some notable programs that offer financial assistance are underused.

A few examples: Nearly 14 million adults age 60 or older qualify for aid from the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (also known as food stamps) but haven’t signed up, according to recent estimates. Also, more than 3 million adults 65 or older are eligible but not enrolled in Medicare Savings Programs, which pay for Medicare premiums and cost sharing. And 30% to 45% of seniors may be missing out on help from the Medicare Part D Low-Income Subsidy program, which covers plan premiums and cost sharing and lowers the cost of prescription drugs.

“Tens of billions of dollars of benefits are going unused every year” because seniors don’t know about them, find applications too difficult to complete, or feel conflicted about asking for help, said Josh Hodges, chief customer officer at the National Council on Aging, an advocacy group for older Americans that runs the National Center for Benefits Outreach and Enrollment.

Many programs target seniors with extremely low incomes and minimal assets. But that isn’t always the case: Programs funded by the Older Americans Act, such as home-delivered meals and legal assistance for seniors facing home foreclosures or eviction, don’t require a means test, although people with low incomes are often prioritized. And some local programs, such as property tax breaks for homeowners, are available to anyone 65 or older.

Even a few hundred dollars in assistance monthly can make a world of difference to older adults living on limited incomes that make it difficult to afford basics such as food, housing, transportation, and health care. But people often don’t know how to find out about benefits and whether they qualify. And older adults are often reluctant to seek help, especially if they’ve never done so before.

“You’ve earned these benefits,” Hodges said, and seniors should think of them “like their Medicare, like their Social Security.”

Here’s how to get started and some information about a few programs.

Getting Help: In every community, Area Agencies on Aging, organizations devoted to aiding seniors, perform benefits assessments or can refer you to other organizations that conduct these evaluations. (To get contact information for your local Area Agency on Aging, use the Eldercare Locator, a service of the federal Administration on Aging, or call 800-677-1116 on weekdays during business hours.)

Assessments identify which federal, state, and local programs can assist with various needs — food, housing, transportation, health care, utility costs, and other essential items. Often, staffers at the agency will help seniors fill out application forms and gather necessary documentation.

A common mistake is waiting until a crisis hits and there’s no food in the refrigerator or the power company is about to turn off the electricity.

“It’s a much better idea to be prepared,” said Sandy Markwood, chief executive officer of USAging, a national organization that represents Area Agencies on Aging. “Come in, sit down with somebody, and put all your options on the table.”

Older adults who are comfortable online and want to do their own research can use BenefitsCheckUp, a service operated by the National Council on Aging, at benefitscheckup.org. Those who prefer using the phone can call 800-794-6559.

Food Assistance: Some aging organizations are adapting to heightened demand for help from seniors by focusing attention on core benefits such as food stamps, which have become even more important as food inflation runs around 10%.

The potential to help seniors with these expenses is enormous. In a new series of reports, the AARP Public Policy Institute estimates that 71% of adults age 60 and above who qualify for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program haven’t signed up for benefits.

In some cases, older adults may think benefits are too small to be worth the hassle. But seniors who lived alone received an average of $104 in food stamps per month in 2019. And at least 3 million adults 50 and above with very low incomes would receive more than $200 a month, AARP estimates.

To combat the stigma that some older adults attach to food stamps, AARP has launched a marketing campaign in Atlanta and Houston explaining that “food prices are rising and we’re all trying to stretch our grocery budgets,” said Nicole Heckman, vice president of benefit access programs at the AARP Foundation.

If the effort alters seniors’ perception of the program and increases enrollment, AARP plans to do a major expansion next year, she said.

Health Care Assistance: AARP is also working closely with community organizations in South Carolina, Alabama, and Mississippi that help older adults apply for Medicare Savings Programs and low-income subsidies for Part D prescription drug plans. It plans to expand this program next year to as many as 22 states.

The value of these health care benefits, targeted at low-income seniors, is substantial. At a minimum, Medicare Savings Programs will cover the cost of Medicare’s Part B premiums: $170 a month, or $2,040 annually, for most seniors. For older adults with the lowest incomes, benefits are even broader, with cost sharing for medical services also covered.

“Even if you think you might not qualify, you should apply because there are different rules across states,” said Meredith Freed, a senior policy analyst for KFF’s Program on Medicare Policy.

Low-income subsidies for Part D prescription drug plans, also known as Extra Help, are worth $5,100 annually, according to the Social Security Administration. Currently, some seniors get only partial benefits, but that will change in 2024, when all older adults with incomes below 150% of the federal poverty level ($20,385 for a single person in 2022) will qualify for full Extra Help benefits.

Because these health care programs are complicated, getting help with your application is a good idea. Freed suggested that people start by contacting the State Health Insurance Assistance Program in their state (contact information can be found here). Other potential sources of help are the Medicare hotline (800-633-4227) and your state’s department of aging, which can direct you to community organizations that help with applications. A list of the state departments can be found here.

Other Assistance: Be sure to check out property tax relief programs for seniors in your area as part of a broader “benefits checkup” process.

Older adults with low incomes also can get assistance with high energy bills through the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program. Your local utility company may also provide emergency relief to seniors who can’t pay their bills. It’s worth making a call to find out, advised Rebecca Lerfelt, the retired assistant director of a Chicago-area Aging and Disability Resource Center. These resource centers help people seeking access to long-term care services and are another potential source of assistance for older adults. You can find one in your area here.

For veterans, “this may be the time to take a look at using your VA benefits,” said Diane Slezak, president of AgeOptions, an Area Agency on Aging in suburban Cook County, Illinois. “I run into a lot of people who are eligible for veterans benefits but not taking advantage of them.”

Advocates for many programs note that agencies serving older adults are facing staff shortages, which are complicating the efforts to provide assistance. Low pay is a commonly cited reason. For example, 41% of Area Agencies on Aging report staff vacancies of up to 15%, while an additional 18% report vacancies up to 25%, according to Markwood. Also, agencies have lost significant numbers of volunteers during the covid-19 pandemic.

At the same time, demand for help has risen, and clients’ needs have become more complex because of the pandemic and growing inflation.

“All of this is being amplified by the financial strains older adults are feeling,” Markwood said.

More healthcare and financial assistance programs can be found in PNN’s Patient Resources section.

Kaiser Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues.

Older Adults Look Beyond Western Medicine for Help With Joint Pain

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Most older Americans use over-the-counter pain medication and exercise to manage their joint pain, according to a large new survey of adults over age 50. Marijuana, opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were rated the most effective pain relievers among those who used them.

The survey of 2,277 adults aged 50 to 80 was conducted online and over the phone early this year as part of the University of Michigan’s National Poll on Healthy Aging. It found that many older adults looked beyond conventional Western medicine for help with their joint pain, but few talked to their doctors about it.

Eight out of ten people (80%) with joint pain said they were confident they could manage it on their own. The survey found that two-thirds (66%) used over-the-counter pain relievers such as NSAID’s or acetaminophen.

The vast majority (89%) also used non-pharmacologic treatments to manage their symptoms, including exercise (64%), massage (26%), physical therapy (24%), splints or braces (13%), and acupuncture or acupressure (5%).

One in four (26%) said they take supplements, such as glucosamine, chondroitin and turmeric, while 11% use cannabidiol (CBD) products and 9% use marijuana.

Only a minority use prescription-based treatments, such as non-opioid pain relievers (18%), steroid joint injections (19%), oral steroids (14%), opioids (14%) and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (4%).

NATIONAL POLL ON HEALTHY AGING

“There are sizable risks associated with many of these treatment options, especially when taken long-term or in combination with other drugs. Yet 60 percent of those taking two or more substances for their joint pain said their health care provider hadn’t talked with them about risks, or they couldn’t recall if they had,” said Beth Wallace, MD, Assistant Professor of Internal Medicine at Michigan Medicine and a staff rheumatologist at the VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System.

“This suggests a pressing need for providers to talk with their patients about how to manage their joint pain, and what interactions and long-term risks might arise if they use medications to do so.”

Both NSAIDs and oral steroids have health risks, especially for older adults. Chronic NSAID use can worsen medical conditions such as hypertension, kidney disease, gastrointestinal bleeding and cardiovascular disease. Short-term use of oral steroids is associated with similar problems, as well as increased risk of developing diabetes, cataracts, insomnia, depression, and anxiety.

The risks are even greater if NSAIDs and oral steroids are taken together. Despite this, about one in four older adults taking oral steroids for joint pain said they had not discussed the potential risks with their provider.

Joint pain is common among older adults, including those who have not been formally diagnosed with arthritis. Nearly half of those surveyed reported joint pain that limited their daily activities, but few rated their symptoms as severe and most regarded joint pain as a normal part of aging.

Those with severe joint pain were somewhat fatalistic about it, with nearly half (49%) agreeing with the statement that “there is nothing a person with arthritis or joint pain can do to make their symptoms better.” Only 10% of those with mild joint pain agreed there was nothing they could do about it.

“Older adults with fair or poor physical or mental health were much more likely to agree with the statement that there’s nothing that someone with joint pain can do to ease their symptoms, which we now know to be untrue. Health providers need to raise the topic of joint pain with their older patients, and help them make a plan for care that might work for them,” said poll director Preeti Malani, MD, a Michigan Medicine physician who specializes in geriatrics and infectious diseases.

Why ‘Dopesick’ Should Get an Emmy for Fiction

By Dr. Lynn Webster and Hazel Shahgholi

Dopesick, the eight-part Hulu series on the opioid epidemic – sorry, the OxyContin epidemic -- has been nominated for 14 Emmy awards. Based on the best-selling book of the same name by Beth Macy, most of the nominations are well-earned, from the excellent acting of Michael Keaton (nominated for Outstanding Lead Actor) to the breakout performance of Kaitlyn Dever (nominated for Outstanding Supporting Actress) as an addicted patient.

As entertainment, Dopesick is an achievement, but the awards should only be given if the admission is made that the Hulu series is almost entirely fictional. So far, the series’ makers have failed to do so, with Executive Producer Danny Strong claiming that robust research was carried out to make the series as realistic as possible.

“I had done a ton of research, conceived and sold the show before I even knew the book Dopesick existed,” Strong told The Hollywood Reporter. "I read the book, and I loved it. I thought it was a beautiful book, incredibly well done.”

The problems with the Hulu series are many-fold, mostly arising from errors, conflations and under-examinations that are littered throughout Macy’s book, as well as the fact/fiction transition necessary in the baton pass from page to screen.

Strong took many elements of Macy’s dubiously factual text at face value, picking up on the well-established narrative that Purdue Pharma’s marketing of OxyContin was the root cause of the opioid epidemic.

As a result, the series was almost literally bound to fail as an adequate representation of the true origins and spread of opioid use disorder.

OxyContin Misinformation

We know that throughout the opioid epidemic, OxyContin made up, at most, only 4% of the total market for prescription opioids. This data was available at the time of Macy’s book release in 2018 and when the Hulu series came out in 2021. It’s not difficult to find, if one searches beyond the bombast of mainstream news about opioids to focus instead on medical literature and government data.

In the first episode, Strong creates a highly dramatic, but erroneous opening scene. While being questioned by a federal prosecutor, Dr. Samuel Finnix (Michael Keaton), a fictional general practitioner, is asked under oath, “What do you think caused so many deaths in such a short period of time?”

Flashbacks intervene before Finnix states, definitively: “OxyContin.” The prosecutor then hammers home the point by asking, “So just to be clear, you are blaming numerous deaths in your region on just one medication?” And with a heavy-heart, filled with prescriber regret and his own addiction stigmatization, Finnix states, “Yes.”

This total condemnation of Purdue, the Sackler family and OxyContin resides entirely in the realm of fiction. We know from a 2012 Bloomberg BusinessWeek exposé on Florida pill mill operators that it was actually oxycodone and hydrocodone-based generics that were fueling opioid use disorder. It is this type of dangerous, OxyContin-pincered misinformation that has propagated a national misunderstanding about opioids, and kept us from moving from blaming to healing.

Rather than the devoutly religious and close-knit Mallum family, who earn their daily bread through hard work in West Virginia’s mines, the Hulu series has the Sacklers sitting down to meet at opposite ends of a table, as opposed to holding hands in prayer. The Sackler family is separated into those who have “A Shares” and those with “B Shares” in Purdue -- a split that divides the heirs and sees them wrestle over profits. As depicted in the series, the Sacklers are not a family, but a business, through and through.

Fictionalizing the Truth

The time-leaps throughout this eight-part series are anchored on the discoveries of law enforcement as it digs deep into Purdue Pharma. But this organizing principle proves thoroughly dizzying, obfuscating the “human interest” element that makes up much of Macy’s book.

Because the series is also determined to paint physicians and patients in an antagonistic relationship, we end up with just two fictional representations of “doctors” and “patients” -- Keaton’s Dr. Finnix and Dever’s Betsy Mallum, whose characters were explained by Strong in a 2021 interview with NPR, in which he praised the merits of not being “stuck to the truth.”

“If I made these characters composite characters, I get way more of these anecdotes into these arcs with fewer characters and get more truthful stories into the show," Strong said. "By fictionalizing, [emphasis added] I wouldn't be stuck to the truth of one person's life. I could use as many anecdotes as I wanted. I could achieve a more universal truth; a higher truth."

Dr. Finnix is the epitome of a “composite character” into whom most material and several arcs are heavy-handedly stuffed. He is emblematic of a problematic prescriber. We only meet three of his patients in detail — Mallum, his ex-miner patient Jonas, and a young woman named Elizabeth-Anne — all of whom become addicts. Finnix himself becomes addicted, getting high on his patients’ diverted supply. This distillation of Finnix cannot be taken as a “more universal truth,” even in a meager sense, as we shall explore.

The mechanism by which Finnix becomes addicted to OxyContin happens in a flash that straddles two episodes. One moment he is the ever-attentive country physician, happily working 16-hour days, making night calls to elderly patients with dementia to ensure all their daily meds have been duly taken, attending to the injuries of his coal-mining patients, and often delivering their children.

Finnix is a man of simple pleasures; he enjoys fishing with members of the Finch Creek community of which he forms the responsible backbone, until the devil invades the town in the form of OxyContin. Upon receiving a call about an explosion in a mine that has left several workers in critical condition, he speeds back to Finch Creek from a visit to Washington D.C. to see his late-wife’s sister, who has encouraged him to start dating again.

In his haste, Finnix doesn’t buckle-up and is T-boned by another vehicle. He suffers several broken ribs in the accident and is prescribed 20mg of OxyContin, much to his surprise, as he usually starts his patients on 10mg tablets.

Cut to Episode 4, entitled “Pseudo-Addiction.” Without any explanation of why the hitherto cautious prescriber has not had follow-up treatment with an independent physician -- we see Finnix cast in utter damnation, diverting OxyContin prescriptions for his own personal use. Presumably, adding another physician to the story would have taken up too much screen time, and undone the drama of Keaton’s lone composite character.

Dependency and Addiction

Let’s pause for a moment to unpack Strong’s haste. It is again based on a conflation made by Macy, who fails in her book to differentiate between the medical terms “dependency” and “addiction.” This is a false narrative. Addiction and dependence are related, but cannot be equated, and should not be conflated. Many drugs, including antidepressants and anticonvulsants, can cause such physiologic adaptation that abrupt withdrawal can cause serious, even life-threatening events. This is the case with opioids, too.

But being dependent is not the same as being addicted. And by not using the term “dependency” extensively in her book, Macy paints a false picture that hyperbolizes all opioid use, prescription or illicit, as inherently a kind of addiction -- when there are millions of people with chronic pain dependent on opioids, but not addicted.

Interestingly, Strong’s series does use the word “dependency” once, in Episode 4, via a nameless, testifying physician character, and in a scientifically false and unhelpful way. With cuts to Finnix locking the last of his patients’ diverted pills in a glass kitchen cabinet, before smashing said cabinet to smithereens, the unnamed physician states, “Opioids are uniquely challenging as they can change a person’s brain chemistry. But in a desperate effort to end the cycle of dependency, some people try to quit cold turkey, but the results can often be disastrous.”

It is important to note that this moment in the series can be enlarged by turning to statements made by Strong in an interview on MSNBC’s Morning Joe, in which he claimed that “you can be addicted in three days” to OxyContin.

That is blatantly false. Neural adaptation can occur as soon as ingesting the first pill. But this is not necessarily problematic, it is simple science and occurs with many drugs, not just opioids. The claim that you can become addicted to opioids in three days is simply not true, and there is no scientific evidence to support this statement. Physical dependency, which they clearly conflate with addiction, is not even a medical problem at day three, day seven, or day fourteen. It may never even become a problem.

But this question cannot even be properly attended to until the differentiation between addiction and dependency is substantiated in these depictions. Respectfully, how can Strong purport to “redefine our understanding” of something that he himself does not understand? 

Strong’s need to distill information is so extreme that Dr. Finnix is funneled into an OxyContin-self-prescribing-and-diverting-monster between the rolling of one set of credits and the opening of a new episode.

Strong’s MSNBC interview is hyperbolically backdropped by a hysterical graphic claiming over 760,000 overdose deaths — a conflated statistic that doesn’t distinguish what drugs caused the deaths. Was it OxyContin? Oxycodone? Hydrocodone? Heroin? Cocaine? Methamphetamine? Poly drug use?

Whether the deaths were due to illicit misuse, diverted pills or legitimate prescriptions is also ignored. We are only told by the reporter conducting the interview that, “OxyContin is the brand most people know.” Indeed. The opioid epidemic has become a cash-cow for misrepresentation.

MSNBC

It is important to note that pseudo-addiction is also mischaracterized in the Hulu series. It is used as a mechanism to accuse Purdue Pharma of encouraging irresponsible over-prescribing, when in fact it attends to patients in a state of severe “uncontrolled” pain. Uncontrolled pain is as devastating as it sounds, especially when we have means to treat it.

Once again, it is a concept that should be considered scientifically and medically, not simply as a harmful concept “invented” by Purdue for profit gains. Uncontrolled pain was not invented by Purdue at all, and has been studied from as early as 1989, before being expanded into the use of opioids for responsible pain management and becoming common amongst pain specialists for over three decades.

‘Selling Poison’

Dr. Finnix follows a similar path as the composite “addict” character, Betsy Mallum: from OxyContin use to chronic opioid abuse. He never moves to heroin, but he does buy OxyContin illicitly, while being schooled by a local drug dealer on how to get a faster high by crushing and snorting the pills through a straw.

It's not long before Finnix’s collapse is total. He has begun to behave uncharacteristically, beating his Purdue sales rep before manhandling him out of his office for “selling poison.”

The axe finally drops in a grizzly scene when Finnix is high during a surgical procedure. Then, while accompanying his now butchered patient to the ER, he complains to the attending doctor of rib-ache and requests OxyContin unabashedly. The doctor offers him a 10mg tablet, but Finnix ups the request to a 20mg pill in a manner that paints him as perhaps the most suspicious doctor-shopping-doctor imaginable.

The onus of representation for the addict group falls mostly on Betsy Mallum (Dever), who, when quizzed in an interview with Entertainment Weekly over the fact/fiction nature of her character replies: “Yes. She's a fictional character that represents a lot of people.”

Betsy is the first patient that Dr. Finnix turns into an addict. She receives the “First-Bottle” of OxyContin, to borrow Episode 1’s title, and uses the pain medicine to continue to work at the mines despite an excruciating work-related injury.

There are two points of note here: Finnix prescribes OxyContin to her with strict instructions for when to take the pills -- one in the morning and one at night -- which Betsy does. He also provides the appropriate advice of a rest period from her grueling work in the mines. He offers to go down and talk to management himself in order for the young woman be able to take a break to aid her physical healing. Betsy does not take his advice.

This is because of the important part the socioeconomic environment plays in Betsy’s crucial and unexamined predisposition toward addiction and substance abuse disorder. She knows how the mining industry works and that, in her father’s own account, she is the smallest "but strongest” one down there.

Betsy therefore has the obligation of needing both to retain her work: she’s a small-statured female and knows she is at high-risk for disposability in a shrinking industry, but she must also fulfill a need for validation from her domineering and deeply religious father. A father who would cast her out if she were to reveal her true self: her sexuality as a lesbian involved in a behind-closed-doors relationship with fellow mine worker, Grace.

This moves us on to a pivotal point. Even though Betsy is the recipient of the “first bottle,” she dumps her prescription by Episode 3, “The Fifth Vital Sign,” without tapering of any kind and without informing Dr. Finnix. Subsequently, she descends into a world of illicit diverted pills and eventually heroin. It is the latter drug that takes her life, the night before she is to enter a Suboxone treatment program and after a conversation with Grace, when she finds out that her first love can only be a friend moving forward.

Due to her addiction, Betsy never manages to make “enough money underground” to move to Grace’s Eureka Springs, Arkansas; a real place that Grace describes to Betsy as “Oz for country queers.” Devoid of hope after losing her first love, Betsy informs her flop house drug dealer that she is entering a Suboxone treatment center the following day. “So give me one hell of a sendoff,” she states as her final, fatal words.

The Fifth Vital Sign

To move beyond the episode’s sign-posting, the show depicts the medical community’s adoption of pain as the “Fifth Vital Sign” as a ploy to fuel over-prescribing. At the time the phrase was introduced, pain was vastly under-treated, there was a pressing need to bring attention to the unmet needs of chronic pain sufferers across the nation, and to facilitate dialogue between physicians and their patients to assess their pain levels and explore treatments — with opioids being just one — to increase their quality of life.

Introducing pain as a “vital sign” was an entirely reasonable pathway to take by the medical community. Although it is reasonable to argue that pain is not a vital sign in the way that breathing and heart beats are, it is nevertheless vital to assess pain.  But once again, it was not a Purdue “invention” as the show would usher you to believe, it was first discussed by Dr. James Campbell in an address to the American Pain Society in 1995. The term has faced some controversy, but it was well-intentioned.

What Macy failed to do in her mishaps over medical research in her book, which led to Strong’s OxyContin demonization, does not befit an analysis of the overdose death of Betsy Mallum. Per scientific examination, the pivotal 1998 CDC-Kaiser Permanente Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) study used ten different measures of adverse childhood experiences, drawing the conclusion that that “for each traumatic event that happened to a child, they were two to four times more likely to grow up to be an addicted adult.”

The one we can outline as specific to Betsy is “parental rejection.” This is what she fears the most. When Betsy attempts to come out to her mother by stating that she “likes girls… always have… and not just as friends,” her words fall on deaf ears, with her mother quite literally pretending she didn’t hear the utterance: “Did you say something dear?”

It’s a statement Betsy’s mother later regrets, realizing its impact, but by then it is far too late. Finnix’s pre-OxyContin-addiction fishing trip during which he tries to irk Betsy’s rigid father into the enlightened mindset that being gay is not a sin but just a state of being, also misfires and leads to a demonizing, make-no-mistake style dinner scene.

Unable to live as her true self through fear of rejection and in the throes of withdrawal, Betsy burns the false-self: the one that is content sitting at home and knitting quilts with her in-denial mother.

When the news of her death is revealed, we see the camera focus on a picture of Betsy as a young child. This is also emblematic of denial; but this time not of the fictional Mallum family alone, but also of the filmmakers and Macy, who push for the narrative of the destruction of innocence via the opioid scourge.

Addiction’s Root Causes

The Mallum parents, through the zealot foisting of religion on a girl who “never believed in any of that stuff anyway,” did their daughter a deathly disservice. And they are more culpable for her death than Purdue Pharma or Dr. Finnix.

Betsy had a predisposition for substance abuse disorder, but Finnix did not. Although in Episode 4 we see him in a hallucinated waltz with his deceased wife, he seems content as a widower — although the dance scene does belie his underlying existential pain.

The filmmakers didn’t even throw in any trite backstory or anecdote of Finnix having an alcoholic father or brother — a detail that would barely be substantiating for predisposition per today’s medical rigor over addiction’s root causes. But it would have at least stimulated the viewer into questioning why this character had morphed so horrifically and so expressly.

The young Betsy, on the other hand, has a story of her own and one that would undeniably predispose her to substance abuse. Despite Strong’s claims, one must stick to individual stories to understand addiction, its roots, and the specific drugs that may come to fuel it.

By choosing to fictionalize via character composites, and by picking a “patient” so heavily predisposed to substance abuse disorder due to ACE and environmental factors, Dopesick doesn’t adequately represent the patient side of the doctor-patient relationship at all. The human element that is strong-armed into Finnix and Betsy is loaded for downfall, because that makes for good viewing.  One arc is devastating — Betsy’s — and Finnix’s is convoluted, although redemptive in the end.

Covering all bases in this fashion is hyper-unrealistic, difficult to digest, and self-serving on the part of the filmmakers in their need to enthrall their audience.

‘We Have Another Pharma Case’

There is another clandestine narrative at work in Dopesick. A prosecutor fights prostate cancer as he tries to bring Purdue to justice. After waking from a surgical procedure to remove the cancer, even while semi-conscious and in extreme post-surgical pain, he is aghast at the insistency of a nurse who tries to “force” OxyContin upon him. Heroically, he refuses and relays the tale back to his boss, who declares he made the “right choice” to fight the pain with the over-the-counter, non-narcotic Motrin.

What makes the parallel between the prosecutor and Finnix so powerful is that both characters moved from bigger towns to small West Virginian areas and both describe this life choice as the “best decision I ever made.”

The difference between the two characters is that good old Dr. Finnix, the responsible and attentive physician, falls prey to addiction almost immediately, while the representative of law enforcement holds strong.

Per the narrative of the “Iron Law of Prohibition” that this show peddles, representatives of the law must be invulnerable. The show pushes this weak theory clearly. After all, who could be more of a “drop out” than a physician, who is the biggest threat? It’s not the Sacklers, if we follow the human element, but prescribers.

This good/bad dichotomy is cemented in the last statement made by the chief prosecutor of his future plans: “We have another pharma case we’re looking into…” Tellingly, the drug company is not named, perhaps because it couldn’t be.

The fight for pharmaceutical anti-opioid justice is a good story and resonates with the public. But as a society, perhaps we should focus on addiction and its role in the human condition. Treating addiction, as opposed to distilling and misleading the public about its causes, might be a better way to slow the continuing rise of drug overdoses in America.

(Update: Dopesick won two Emmys, for outstanding lead actor and outstanding cinematography.)

Lynn R. Webster, MD, is Senior Fellow at the Center for U.S. Policy (CUSP) and Chief Medical Officer of PainScript. He also consults with the pharmaceutical industry. Lynn is the author of the award-winning book The Painful Truth, and co-producer of the documentary It Hurts Until You Die.

Hazel Shahgholi is a senior editor and journalist based in New York City. Her most recent roles include Deputy Editor of amNY Metro, Editor in Chief of The Bronx Times, and Production Editor for MedPage Today.