What Do You Think About Changes to CDC Opioid Guideline?

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Do you think the proposed changes to the CDC’s opioid guideline are an improvement over the original 2016 guideline? Will the changes make doctors more or less willing to prescribe opioids? Should the guideline be expanded to include recommendations for treating conditions like migraine and low back pain?

Those are some of the questions we’re asking in a new PNN survey on the long-awaited draft revision of the guideline that was unveiled last month by the CDC.  In addition to giving healthcare providers more flexibility in using opioid medication to manage chronic pain, some experts say the changes effectively transform the guideline into a national “standard of care” for pain management – one that would apply to most doctors and patients, regardless of the severity or duration of their pain.

While the guideline changes have been applauded by professional societies like the American Medical Association for removing “arbitrary doses thresholds” for opioids, some worry that the expansion goes too far and could harm patients -- like the original guideline did -- by depriving them of effective pain treatments.

“The CDC is outside its lane to be recommending how physicians should practice pain medicine. Would they recommend how to treat hypertension or diabetes? If they did, it too would be inappropriate, unless it was in collaboration with one or more of the medical professional societies devoted to those areas,” says Lynn Webster, MD, Senior Fellow at the Center for U.S. Policy and past president of the American Academy of Pain Medicine.

“I have a lot of concerns about the new version. It is better, but still terribly misleading and not grounded in science, which is terrible disappointing.” 

90 MME Threshold Dropped

Perhaps the biggest change to the 2016 guideline is the CDC’s decision to drop a recommendation that opioid doses not exceed 90 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per day, which quickly became a hard limit for many providers, insurers, states and regulators.

While the CDC still recommends caution about doses exceeding 50 MME, that advice is not enough for Lewis Nelson, MD, a longtime critic of opioid prescribing who advised the agency when the original guideline was created. He thinks the 90 MME limit is based on sound evidence.

“There are good data to support that there is an inflection point at 90 MME. It’s clear that high-dose chronic opioid therapy is associated with a number of adverse consequences -- including addiction, unintentional overdose and potentially death,” says Nelson, the Chair of Emergency Medicine at Rutgers New Jersey Medical School. “In a way, it’s a race to the bottom in pain management, because if you’re not getting better with a reasonable dose of an opioid, there’s nothing to support that additional opioid is going to carry significant benefit and is known to markedly increase the risk.”

Dr. Webster says the use of MME to guide prescribing is misleading because not all opioids are the same or convert well to MME doses. Like others, he worries that 50 MME will become the new hard threshold for opioid doses.

“I think any reference to conversion tables and MME will be interpreted as validation of them. We saw that with the 2016 guideline,” Webster told PNN. “The CDC needs to explicitly state the lack of scientific basis for both and that their use could be dangerous in some cases. They should not cite 50 MME threshold anywhere, as it is meaningless, misleading and will lead to further misapplication of the recommendation. You would think that they would have learned that by the 2016 guideline.” 

Take Our Survey

This is the fifth survey PNN has conducted on the CDC guideline. All of them found that the vast majority of patients and providers believe the guideline was harmful, worsened the quality of pain care, and led some patients to contemplate suicide or turn to street drugs.    

For those who think surveys are a waste of time and the CDC doesn’t pay attention to them -- think again. On Page 53 of its revised opioid guideline, the agency cites PNN’s 2017 survey and has a footnote linking to it:

"An online (non-peer reviewed) survey of over 3000 patients 1 year after the release of the 2016 CDC Guideline found that 84% reported more pain and worse quality of life and 42% said they had considered suicide; however, the survey did not attempt to sample patients with chronic pain using a rigorous methodological approach.”  

It’s true the PNN survey was not peer-reviewed and that patients were not sampled with a “rigorous methodological approach.”  It’s also true that CDC has not conducted a large survey of its own to measure the impact of its guideline on patients. The agency has focused on counting opioid prescriptions — not patient outcomes — as a measure of whether its guideline is working.

To take our new survey, click here.

It should only take a few minutes to complete. We’ll share the results in mid-April.

'This is an opportunity for patients, caregivers, clinicians and others to share their impressions of the 2022 revised and expanded CDC practice guidelines for treatment of acute and chronic pain,” says patient advocate Richard “Red” Lawhern, PhD.

“This guideline will ultimately steer pain care for the foreseeable future, for better or worse. The more involved and informed every part of our community is, the more we can help shape its impact. This survey is one more way to get involved and help guide future efforts,” said Tamera Lynn Stewart, Policy Director for P3 Political Action Alliance.

You can read the revised draft of the CDC guideline and leave an online comment in the Federal Register by clicking here. Comments must be received by April 11.

Strict Low-Calorie Diet Reduces Fibromyalgia Symptoms

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Fibromyalgia patients with obesity experienced a significant reduction in pain and other symptoms after three weeks on a strict low-calorie diet, according to a new study that suggests limiting calories – not just weight loss – can have an analgesic effect.

Researchers enrolled nearly 200 patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia who were participating in a weight management program at the University of Michigan Health System. Participants had an average body mass index (BMI) of 41, which is considered severe obesity.

For 12 weeks, they were put on a very low energy diet (VLED) that limits bread, rice, potatoes and other foods that are high in carbohydrates. VLED is designed to shift the body away from using glucose in sweet or starchy foods to burning its own body fat for energy. Study participants were limited to just 800 calories a day, less than half the amount recommended for adult women and only a third of the amount recommended for men.

After just three weeks on the restricted diet, nearly three out of four participants (72%) experienced symptom reductions of 30% or more, regardless of the amount of weight lost. Patients who showed little or no improvement had a higher BMI at the start of the study and were more likely to have had a diagnosis of depression.

“Our results show, for the first time, that individuals following aggressive calorie restriction, ie, a VLED, had rapid and significant improvements in pain distribution and common pain-related comorbid symptoms and, importantly, prior to the achievement of significant weight loss,” researchers reported in the journal ACR Open Rheumatology.

“Furthermore, improvement at week 3 was strongly associated with improvement over the entire 12-week course of VLED, suggesting that patients who respond are likely to show these effects early in the process. These findings provide preliminary support for the hypothesis that calorie restriction, per se, can reduce pain and comorbid symptoms in individuals with obesity.”

Fibromyalgia is a poorly understood disorder characterized by widespread body pain, fatigue, poor sleep and depression. The FDA has approved three drugs to treat fibromyalgia -- duloxetine (Cymbalta), milnacipran (Savella) and pregabalin (Lyrica) -- but many patients say the drugs are ineffective and often have side effects.  

Previous studies have suggested that weight loss can help lower pain levels, but the improvement was thought to be caused by reduced stress on knees, hips and lower back – parts of the body that are weight-bearing.  

The new study suggests that a strict diet alone can significantly reduce fibromyalgia pain without major weight loss, but researchers caution that more studies are needed to fully understand the biological processes at work.

“The implications of this study suggest an early association between caloric restriction, through a VLED, and fibromyalgia symptoms. Although a larger study with a control group would be the next step in investigating this association, this provides important information for clinicians who counsel patients on alternatives to pharmacologic treatments for pain and other somatic symptoms,” researchers concluded.     

Many previous studies have shown that a low calorie diet can help reduce pain levels. A 2018 study at the University of Michigan found that obese patients on a low-calorie liquid diet for 12 weeks not only had lower pain levels in their knees and hips, but also in unexpected areas such as the abdomen, arm, chest and jaw. Study participants who lost 10% of their weight also reported better mental health, improved cognition and more energy.

Endometriosis: My Long Road to Diagnosis and Treatment

By Victoria Reed, PNN Columnist 

My first experience with chronic pain occurred early in life. As a teen, I often had unexplained bouts of pelvic pain and very severe menstrual pain, which left me vomiting and incapable of functioning for at least a full day every month.  

Although Advil (ibuprofen) is a common treatment for menstrual pain, I didn’t discover its use for menstrual cramps until I was over the age of 20. Before then, I tried other over-the-counter pain relievers, but they were all ineffective at controlling the pain.  

In between the painful periods, a dull pelvic ache settled in. It was always there, and after a while it just seemed like a normal part of life for me. But one day I came to the realization that it wasn’t normal to have near constant pelvic pain and decided to seek the help of a doctor.  

I first consulted with a doctor who was in my HMO medical plan. He decided to perform a diagnostic laparoscopy. That’s a surgical procedure in which a scope is used to view the abdominal and pelvic organs. I was told that nothing abnormal was seen.  

Not convinced that everything was normal, I sought the help of another doctor about a year later. The new doctor performed another laparoscopy and found evidence of endometriosis. However, he ended the procedure without doing anything to fix it. At the time, I didn’t really know what endometriosis was and the doctor said that the treatment for it was outside of his skill set. I knew I had to keep looking for a doctor that could actually help. 

After some time passed, I saw a third doctor who did weekly ultrasound “treatments” on my pelvis. I’m not exactly sure how that was supposed to work for pain relief, because it didn’t improve anything. I thought it was a little strange, but was willing to try anything. That doctor would later be convicted of gross sexual imposition for his inappropriate conduct with female patients.  

By the time I was in my mid 20’s, I once again decided to seek help for the unrelenting menstrual and pelvic pain. The fourth (and final) doctor I chose was a reproductive endocrinologist and OB/GYN. Little did I know, I hit the jackpot with this one! Not only was he kind and compassionate, but he was skilled at restoring fertility. At the time, I was convinced that I was going to be unable to have babies, as I had read that endometriosis could cause infertility.  

After our initial consult, the doctor came up with a plan to give the pelvic organs a “rest” by inducing a menopause-like condition with a hormone treatment called Lupron. Lupron has been used to treat endometriosis since 1990 and was found to reduce pain in the pelvis and abdomen. It works by suppressing the amount of estrogen in the body and essentially stops the menstrual periods.  

I had two Lupron injections over a period of six months and felt great! However, I wasn’t allowed to stay on the medication indefinitely due to potentially damaging side effects.  

Unfortunately, after some time off the medication, my symptoms gradually returned. In another year or two, I went ahead with another 6-month course of Lupron. Again, during the time I was on it, I felt no pain. It is believed that the endometrial lesions respond directly to circulating estrogen, so pain intensity can fluctuate with the changes throughout the menstrual cycle. The lesions can land anywhere inside the body, including the colon, bladder, lungs or other internal organs and can cause pain that’s not confined to just the pelvic area.  

After my second course of Lupron, I was told that if the symptoms returned, I could consider yet another laparoscopy. As expected, the pain returned again and I consented to a third surgery. However, this laparoscopy would be different. My doctor performed a lysis of adhesions -- a procedure that destroys the misplaced endometrial tissue that cause pain.

He was also able to free up pelvic adhesions and use a procedure to unblock a fallopian tube, thereby restoring my fertility. This surgery was life-changing. Finally!  

The chronic pelvic pain improved, and I went on to have four pregnancies and three successful births. Unfortunately, the menstrual periods continued to be quite painful.  

It’s been a long road, but I was lucky and feel very grateful to find a doctor who was willing and capable of doing what was necessary to help relieve my pain. I recommend that anyone with a diagnosis of endometriosis seek out a reproductive endocrinologist for the best possible treatment. I also advise anyone with this diagnosis to never give up. There is help and hope!

Victoria Reed lives in Cleveland, Ohio. She suffers from endometriosis, fibromyalgia, degenerative disc disease and rheumatoid arthritis. 

Mindfulness Program Reduced Chronic Pain and Opioid Use

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

A mindfulness therapy program reduced chronic pain and emotional distress in patients on long-term opioid therapy, in what’s being touted as the first randomized clinical trial to demonstrate the effectiveness of psychotherapy in reducing pain and opioid use simultaneously.

Researchers at the University of Utah enrolled 250 patients being treated for chronic pain at primary care clinics in the Salt Lake Valley. Most participants took oxycodone or hydrocodone, reported two or more painful conditions, and met the clinical criteria for major depression. Over two-thirds had also been diagnosed with opioid use disorder.

Study participants were randomly assigned to either a standard psychotherapy support group or a mindfulness program called Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement (MORE). Both groups met for 8 weekly two-hour sessions. Patients in the MORE group were trained to meditate on their breathing and body sensations, and to practice 3 minutes of mindfulness before taking opioid medication -- focusing on whether their opioid use was due to drug craving or the need for pain relief.

The study findings, published in JAMA Internal Medicine, showed sustained and significant reductions in pain symptoms, depression and opioid use in the MORE group nine months after treatment ended. Researchers say 45% of MORE participants were no longer misusing opioids (compared to 24% in the support group) and 36% had cut their opioid use in half.

“MORE demonstrated one of the most powerful treatment effects I’ve seen,” lead author Eric Garland, PhD, director of the Center on Mindfulness and Integrative Health Intervention Development at the University of Utah, said in a press release. “There’s nothing else out there that works this well in alleviating pain and curbing opioid misuse.”

Garland believes the sustained benefits of MORE might be related to the program’s ability to restructure the way the brain processes rewards, helping patients shift from valuing the physical and psychological effects of drugs to valuing natural, healthy rewards like a beautiful sunset or the smile on the face of a loved one. 

“Remarkably, the effects of MORE seem to get stronger over time,” said Garland, who has been studying mindfulness for over a decade. “One possible explanation is that these individuals are integrating the skills they’ve learned through MORE into their everyday lives.”  

MORE participants are taught to reevaluate the experience of pain and opioid craving, “zooming in” on what they are feeling and breaking it down into different sensations like heat, tightness or tingling. They learn how those experiences change over time, and to adopt the perspective of an observer.

“Rather than getting caught up in the pain or craving, we teach people how to step back and observe that experience from the perspective of an objective witness,” Garland explained. “When they can do that, people begin to recognize that who they truly are is bigger than any one thought or sensation. They are not defined by their experiences of pain or craving; their true nature is something more.”

Garland said the findings are particularly noteworthy because many participants had multiple chronic pain conditions, were on high-opioid doses and also had psychiatric disorders. The average pain duration of participants at the start of the study was nearly 15 years and their average pain score was 5.5 on a 1 to 10 pain scale.

Supreme Court Hears Arguments in Key Opioid Prescribing Case

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in the case of two doctors appealing their convictions for criminal violations of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) -- a case that could have a significant impact on opioid prescribing nationwide.

Dr. Xiulu Ruan and Dr. Shakeel Kahn were sentenced to lengthy prison terms for prescribing high doses of opioid medication to patients, including one who died from an overdose. Their combined appeals focus on whether jurors were properly instructed that doctors are allowed to prescribe opioids outside the usual standard of medical care, as long as they act in good faith and with a medical purpose.

“It is important for me to be clear that my client didn’t get that instruction,” said attorney Saul Robbins, who represents Ruan. “His jury was told if he was outside the bounds of medicine, you may convict him. Full stop. No good faith, no ‘knowingly or intentionally,’ none of that.”

Kahn’s lawyer told the high court that a strict interpretation of the CSA was having a chilling effect on many doctors, who worry about their “medical morals” being policed by the Drug Enforcement Administration.

“I think that raises the real risk the DEA becomes the de facto national medical board. That’s never been authorized,” said attorney Beau Brindley.

Much of the 90-minute hearing focused on legal semantics and whether the CSA gives doctors the discretion to prescribe medications as they see fit. Some of the court’s most conservative justices asked the toughest questions of a Department of Justice attorney who argued against the doctors’ appeals.

“Many things disturb me about some of the arguments. One is the ungrammatical reading of the statute itself,” said Justice Neal Gorsuch, who openly speculated that Ruan and Kahn could not only be entitled to new trials, but the indictments against them could be dismissed.  

Justice Brett Kavanaugh said the CSA was too vague.

“The problem here, the core as I see it, is the statute says ‘except as authorized’ and the regs (regulations) say ‘legitimate medical purpose.’ That’s very vague language in my estimation,” said Kavanaugh. “Write more specific regs if you have the problem that you’re talking about. But ‘legitimate medical purpose’ is a very vague thing on which reasonable people can disagree.

“There are going to be close calls on what the evidence shows objectively was legitimate. And so, if you’re on the wrong side of the close call as the doctor, you go to prison for 20 years.”

“I don’t think that’s going to be the case for doctors who make innocent mistakes,” replied Eric Feigin, a U.S. deputy solicitor general. “We do not think a doctor can be convicted for something that other doctors would recognize as within the boundaries of medicine.”

It could take several months for the Supreme Court to make a ruling on the case. The high court will not determine whether the doctors are guilty or innocent, but will decide if they were lawfully prosecuted and if new trials are needed. Complicating the appeals of both doctors is that they were also convicted of crimes outside of the CSA.

Ruan, who practiced in Alabama, often gave patients Subsys, an expensive and potent fentanyl spray made by Insys Therapeutics that was only approved by the FDA for breakthrough cancer pain. Ruan prescribed Subsys “off label” to patients who didn’t have cancer, a practice that led to several other doctors being targeted by the DEA. Ruan was also convicted of taking kickbacks from Insys. He was sentenced to 21 years in prison.    

Kahn, who practiced in Wyoming and Arizona, was convicted of prescribing excessive amounts of oxycodone and running a criminal enterprise that resulted in the death of a patient. He is serving a sentence of 25 years.

Fizzy Pain Relievers Are Bad for the Heart

By Pat Anson PNN Editor

Long-term use of the pain reliever acetaminophen has long been associated with liver, kidney, heart and blood pressure problems.  A new study has also found that some acetaminophen tablets are so loaded with salt that they significantly raise the risk of a heart attack or stroke in as little as one year.

At issue are dissolvable acetaminophen tablets that are mostly used to treat cold and flu symptoms, as well as minor aches and pains. The tablets quickly dissolve in water because of their high salt (sodium) content, creating a fizzy, effervescent drink that is absorbed more quickly in the digestive system than a standard tablet.

Some of the fizzy tablets contain as much as 440 milligrams of sodium per pill. A recommended daily dose of two tablets taken four times a day adds up to over 3,500 milligrams – more sodium than three McDonald’s Big Macs – and nearly double the daily amount recommended for healthy adults.

Since high salt content has long been associated with cardiovascular problems, a team of researchers looked at the health records of 300,000 people enrolled in Britain’s National Health Service who were prescribed acetaminophen (paracetamol) to see what impact the medications may have.

Their findings, recently published in the European Heart Journal, showed that patients with a history of high blood pressure (hypertension) taking fizzy acetaminophen tablets were up to 45% more likely to suffer a heart attack, stroke or heart failure within a year. Just one prescription for the tablets increased their risk of dying by 177 percent, and those with five or more prescriptions were 264% more likely to die.

The risk of a heart attack, stroke or death for patients without high blood pressure also rose with a prescription for fizzy acetaminophen, but to a lesser degree.

“The direct message from this study is clear—there are likely to be millions of people worldwide taking paracetamol on a daily basis in a ‘fast-acting’ effervescent or soluble formulation who are increasing their risks of cardiovascular disease and premature death,” wrote Aletta Schutte, PhD, and Bruce Neal, PhD, in an accompanying editorial.

“Fortunately, only a small proportion of paracetamol formulations contain sodium but, with ‘fast-acting’ and ‘fizzy’ medications increasing in popularity, the adverse effects of medication-related sodium intake look set to rise rather than fall.”

The risk isn’t limited to fizzy tablets with acetaminophen. Other effervescent medications containing aspirin, ibuprofen and even vitamins also contain high levels of sodium.  

With or without salt, long-term acetaminophen use can be risky. A recent study at the University of Edinburgh found that acetaminophen significantly raised the risk of heart disease and stroke in people with high blood pressure. Researchers said the increased risk of cardiovascular problems was similar to that seen with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

Acetaminophen is the most widely used over-the-counter pain reliever in the world — and is the active ingredient in Tylenol, Excedrin, and hundreds of pain medications. But a 2021 review found little or no evidence to support the use acetaminophen for most pain conditions.

Lobbying for Better Access to Migraine Care

By Mia Maysack, PNN Columnist

Last week the Alliance for Headache Disorders Advocacy held its 15th annual Headache on the Hill, with over 200 patients and advocates from 48 states visiting close to 300 congressional offices to lobby and raise awareness about migraine and headache disorders. Like last year, most of the participants attended virtually online due to the pandemic. 

As a person living with never-ending head pain from a traumatic brain injury for over two decades, it has been an honor to participate in this event for multiple years. During that time, we've continued to make progress, such as more funding for migraine research, expanding options for symptom management, obtaining access to oxygen therapy, and helping to launch the VA’s Headache Centers of Excellence — which are all meaningful strides towards healthcare reform.

However, I have never been prouder to be a part of this year’s Headache on the Hill (HOH), which had two major “Asks” for our congressional representatives:

Ask #1

Support investment in Headache Centers of Excellence for Indigenous Communities, with $5 million per year in additional appropriations. The goal is to have the Health & Human Services Secretary designate 6 new headache centers in mostly rural reservations, with an emphasis on expanding options for telehealth, so that Native Americans and Alaskan Natives living in isolated areas will be able to connect with and consult with medical professionals online.

Ask #2

Have the General Accountability Office (GAO) issue a report on funding priorities for the National Institutes of Health (NIH), specifically as it relates to headache disorders. Although migraine impacts roughly 40 million Americans and is the main cause of disability for women under 50, migraine research still receives some of the least funding from NIH, even though it has a strategic plan to consider the "burden of individual diseases” when making funding decisions.   

There is a pressing need for more migraine research if we are to find new treatments, invest in viable solutions and alleviate the need for more providers who specialize in treating head pain. Headache and migraine disorders need to be prioritized at NIH -- not above or before any other health condition, but alongside them. 

Government accountability is a part of public service. We need to know in what ways are we moving forward and how our money is being spent.   

Navigating the healthcare system can be challenging. I cannot begin to keep track of the countless hours I've devoted to sitting in waiting rooms at clinics, fighting for insurance coverage, begging for referrals, convincing providers that my ailments are real, and attempting many treatments in desperation for relief.

But as horrendous as my experiences have been at times, nothing compares to the malpractice and neglect that is experienced by patients in marginalized communities. 

It has been documented that Native Americans and Alaskan Natives have the highest rates of disabling headache disorders. They are 40% higher than other races, with a particularly high impact on men. Despite this, Indigenous communities on average have only one neurologist for every 125,000 people!   

Health resources that are caring, regardless of cause or condition, are investments in people. We have huge disparities in equitable care. Why is it that communities with the biggest needs have the fewest resources?

Mia Maysack lives with chronic migraine, cluster headache and fibromyalgia. Mia is the founder of Keepin’ Our Heads Up, a Facebook advocacy and support group, and Peace & Love, a wellness and life coaching practice for the chronically ill. 

Natural Herbs for Intractable Pain Syndrome

By Dr. Forest Tennant, PNN Columnist 

Intractable Pain Syndrome (IPS) is defined as constant pain with cardiovascular, metabolic and hormonal complications. IPS is caused by neuroinflammation inside the brain and spinal cord (central nervous system or CNS) that comes from excess electromagnetic energy generated by a painful disease or injury.

Excess electromagnetic energy activates an immune cell in the CNS called “microglia” to produce inflammation that then destroys tissue in the CNS. Unfortunately, tissue destroyed by inflammation impairs or damages the normal CNS mechanisms that shut off or cause pain to cease. A person may, therefore, develop constant (24/7) pain that overstresses the cardiovascular, metabolic and hormonal systems.

Tissue destruction in the CNS is well documented by brain scans. This relatively recent understanding of how neuroinflammation destroys CNS tissues and causes constant pain is arguably the most important discovery for pain treatment in the 21st Century. Why? We now have some ideas on how to treat IPS that can possibly cure or at least permanently reduce pain rather than just provide temporary, symptomatic relief. 

Treating CNS Inflammation 

When someone develops IPS, it is human nature to seek immediate pain relief and ignore its basic cause. If you have constant (24/7) pain, however, one must accept the fact that you have inflammation in the CNS that must be suppressed. Otherwise, you can reasonably assume that the pain will get worse.  

While research has documented that CNS inflammation may spread, it is unknown whether it ever “burns out.” As of yet, there is no blood or x-ray test to know if “burn out” may occur. This means that every person with IPS must take one or more anti-inflammatory agents to stop further tissue destruction and the worsening of pain. 

A problem when suppressing inflammation in the CNS is that only a few of the anti-inflammatory agents which are commercially available cross the blood brain barrier and enter the spinal fluid in sufficient amounts to be effective. This includes the non-specific anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and corticosteroids.  

Benefits of Natural Herbal Products

Interestingly, natural products such as botanicals, herbs, enzymes and hormones tend to cross the blood brain barrier and provide anti-inflammatory activity. A well-known common example is aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), which is derived from willow tree bark.

This has caused a great deal of interest in the use of natural products for suppression of CNS inflammation. Several research studies in both laboratory tests and animals have found that some natural agents do indeed suppress CNS inflammation.

To date, research has identified five herbs that suppress CNS inflammation. There are likely other natural products that suppress CNS inflammation, but this list is a good start:

1. Ginseng

2. Curcumin

3. Resveratrol

4. Ginger

5. Fisetin

Currently, there are very few controlled blind studies in humans to demonstrate the effectiveness of these herbal products. Personally, I have often seen considerable effectiveness of natural products in reducing the pain of IPS. Other anecdotal reports from patients and doctors are also starting to accumulate.

Precise dosages are unknown, but the manufacturer of each herbal product will have some starting instructions on the label. Herbal agents appear quite safe and have few reported side effects. Herbs can be taken with corticosteroids, opioids, naltrexone, electrical stimulators, neuropathic agents, and essentially all medication used for treatment of IPS.

At this time, we believe there is enough research and clinical experience to recommend both herbal, non-prescription as well as prescription anti-inflammatory agents to assist treatment of IPS. The time has come to treat IPS with a broader-based approach rather than just the use of symptomatic pain relievers.

Based on our current knowledge, IPS will likely get worse unless a person’s treatment program includes agents that suppress CNS inflammation.

Forest Tennant, MD, DrPH, MPH is retired from clinical practice but continues his research on the treatment of arachnoiditis and intractable pain at the Arachnoiditis Research and Education Project. The Tennant Foundation gives financial support to Pain News Network and sponsors PNN’s Patient Resources section.  

$23 Billion Raised for Rare Disease Drug Development

By Roger Chriss, PNN Columnist

Monday, February 28 is Rare Disease Day, a global effort to recognize and raise awareness of rare diseases. The annual event has been held every year since 2008, but has taken on a new tenor amid Covid-19. Long Covid has become one of the biggest threats the coronavirus poses. But like rare diseases, long Covid is not often discussed in public health messaging about the pandemic.

The National Organization of Rare Disorders officially recognizes over 7,000 rare diseases. But the actual number is much higher. Each year some 250 new rare diseases are identified, and existing rare diseases like Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and Ehlers-Danlos syndromes have new types and subtypes identified.

Rare diseases are often only familiar to the people who live with them and the specialists who treat them. For the goal of treatment to be met, rare diseases must be named and characterized. In Europe, a disease is classified as rare if it affects fewer than 1 in 2,000 people, while in the U.S. rare diseases are recognized as conditions that affect fewer than 200,000 people nationally.

They may be rare, but their impact is substantial. A recent study in the Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases estimates that rare diseases affect 25 to 30 million people in the U.S. and more than 300 million people worldwide. Patients and their families have to endure a lengthy “diagnostic odyssey,” often at high financial and emotional cost.

The graphic below helps demonstrate the many barriers that a rare disease patient may encounter in getting a proper diagnosis, such as lack of knowledge about a disease, an overlap of symptoms, lack of diagnostic tests, and inaccurate test results.

According to the U.S. Government Accountability Office, the total cost of rare diseases in 2019 reached $966 billion, counting both direct medical costs and other indirect expenses such as loss of income. But research funding for rare disease has long been limited, in part because of the difficulty in diagnosing them.

Fortunately, that may be changing. A new report by the non-profit Global Genes estimates that nearly $23 billion was raised in 2021 from public and private sources to fund rare disease drug development. That’s a 28 percent increase over the money raised in 2020.

“Rare diseases continue to have a strong allure to investors, as evidenced by the significant capital raised in 2021 to advance companies and pipelines focused on rare conditions,” said Craig Martin, CEO of Global Genes. “We hope and expect that the sector will continue to be strengthened by the vast array of opportunities to advance promising biotechnologies, under expedited review, that can address the tremendous burdens and underlying causes of thousands of rare, genetic conditions currently without approved treatments.”

The past year saw many positive steps toward improving the diagnosis and treatment of rare diseases. Congress is considering the Speeding Therapy Access Today (STAT) Act of 2021,  which requires policy reforms at the FDA to speed up the development of treatments for rare diseases.

Although the STAT Act has yet to pass, the FDA has already taken action to address two rare diseases. The agency recently approved Pyrukynd (mitapivat) tablets to treat hemolytic anemia in adults with pyruvate kinase deficiency and Vyvgart (efgartigimod) for the treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis.

The past year also saw efforts to improve research and data collection for rare diseases. AllStripes added 100 rare disease research programs to its efforts, and RARE-X launched its initial set of data collection programs. And Rare Diseases International started its Collaborative Global Network for Rare Diseases to create a “a person-centered network of care and expertise” for people living with rare diseases.

But more work needs to be done. The EveryLife Foundation for Rare Diseases notes that 93% of rare diseases have no FDA-approved treatment. In some cases, the pathophysiology is not well understood and animal models do not even exist. In other cases, although the disease is known and treatments do exist, there are too few clinicians and too little financial support for patients.

For people with rare diseases, every day is “rare disease day.” Hopefully efforts to recognize and increase awareness of rare diseases will promote more progress in their diagnosis and treatment.

Roger Chriss lives with Ehlers Danlos syndrome and is a proud member of the Ehlers-Danlos Society. Roger is a technical consultant in Washington state, where he specializes in mathematics and research. 

Closed Pain Clinics Were ‘Always Pushing Injections’

By Anna Maria Barry-Jester and Jenny Gold, Kaiser Health News

On May 13 of last year, the cellphones of thousands of California residents undergoing treatment for chronic pain lit up with a terse text message: “Due to unforeseen circumstances, Lags Medical Centers will be closing effective May 19, 2021.”

In a matter of days, Lags Medical, a sprawling network of privately owned pain clinics serving more than 20,000 patients throughout the state’s Central Valley and Central Coast, would shut its doors. Its patients, most of them working-class people reliant on government-funded insurance, were left without ready access to their medical records or handoffs to other physicians.

Many patients were dependent on opioids to manage the pain caused by a debilitating disease or injury, according to alerts about the closures that state health officials emailed to area physicians. They were sent off with one final 30-day prescription, and no clear path for how to handle the agony — whether from their underlying conditions or the physical dependency that accompanies long-term use of painkillers — once that prescription ran out.

The closures came on the same day that the California Department of Health Care Services suspended state Medi-Cal reimbursements to 17 of Lags Medical’s 28 locations, citing without detail “potential harm to patients” and an ongoing investigation by the state Department of Justice into “credible allegations of fraud.”

In the months since, the state has declined to elaborate on the concerns that prompted its investigation. Patients are still in the dark about what happened with their care and to their bodies.

photo by Kathleen Hayden (KHN)

Even as the government remains largely silent about its investigation, interviews with former Lags Medical patients and employees, as well as KHN analyses of reams of Medicare and Medi-Cal billing data and other court and government documents, suggest the clinics operated based on a markedly high-volume and unorthodox approach to pain management. This includes regularly performing skin biopsies that industry experts describe as out of the norm for pain specialists, as well as notably high rates of other sometimes painful procedures, including nerve ablations and high-end urine tests that screen for an extensive list of drugs.

Those procedures generated millions of dollars in insurer payments in recent years for Lags Medical Centers, an affiliated network of clinics under the ownership of Dr. Francis P. Lagattuta. The clinics’ patients primarily were insured by Medicare, the federally funded program for seniors and people with disabilities, or Medi-Cal, California’s Medicaid program for low-income residents.

Taken individually, the fees for each procedure are not eye-popping. But when performed at high volume, they add up to millions of dollars.

Take, for example, the punch biopsy, a medical procedure in which a circular blade is used to extract a sample of deep skin tissue the size of a pencil eraser. The technique is commonly used in dermatology to diagnose skin cancer but has limited use in pain management medicine, usually involving a referral to a neurologist, according to multiple experts interviewed. These experts said it would be unusual to use the procedure as part of routine pain management.

KHN used Medi-Cal records to assess the volume of services performed across the entire chain. But the state could not provide totals for how much Lags Medical was reimbursed because of California’s extensive use of managed-care plans, which do not make their reimbursement rates public. Where possible, KHN estimated the worth of Medi-Cal procedures based on the set rates Medi-Cal pays traditional fee-for-service plans, which are public.

Lags Medical clinics performed more than 22,000 punch biopsies on Medi-Cal patients from 2016 through 2019, according to state data. Medi-Cal reimbursement rates for punch biopsies changed over time. In 2019 the state’s reimbursement rate was more than $200 for a set of three biopsies performed on patients in fee-for-service plans.

Laboratory analysis of punch biopsies was worth far more. Lags Medical clinics sent biopsies to a Lags-affiliated lab co-located at a clinic in Santa Maria, according to medical records and employee interviews. From 2016 through 2019, Lags Medical clinics and providers performed tens of thousands of pathology services associated with the preparation and examination of tissue samples from Medi-Cal patients, according to state records. The services would have been worth an estimated $3.9 million using Medi-Cal’s average fee-for-service rates during that period.

In that same period, Medicare reimbursed Lagattuta at least $5.7 million for pathology activities using those same billing codes, federal data shows.

‘Assembly Line’ Pain Care

Much of the work at Lags Medical was performed by a relatively small number of nurse practitioners and physician assistants, each juggling dozens of patients a day with sporadic, often remote supervision by the medical doctors affiliated with the clinics, according to interviews with former employees. Lagattuta himself lived in Florida for more than a year while serving as medical director, according to testimony he provided as part of an ongoing malpractice lawsuit that names Lagattuta, Lags Medical, and a former employee as defendants.

Former employees said they were given bonuses if they treated more than 32 patients in a day, a strategy Lagattuta confirmed in his deposition in the malpractice lawsuit. “If they saw over, like, 32 patients, they would get, like, $10 a patient,” Lagattuta testified.

The lawsuit, filed in Fresno County Superior Court, accuses a Lags Medical provider in Fresno of puncturing a patient’s lung during a botched injection for back pain. Lagattuta and the other named defendants have denied the incident was due to negligent treatment, saying, in part, the patient consented to the procedure knowing it carried risks.

Hector Sanchez, the nurse practitioner who performed the injection and is named in the lawsuit, testified in his own deposition that providers at the Lags Medical clinic in Fresno each treated from 30 to 40 patients on a typical workday.

According to Sanchez’s testimony and interviews with two additional former employees, Lags Medical clinics also offered financial bonuses to encourage providers to perform certain medical procedures, including punch biopsies and various injections. “We were incentivized initially to do these things with cash bonuses,” said one former employee, who asked not to be named for fear of retribution. “There was a lot of pressure to get those done, to talk patients into getting these done.”

In his own deposition in the Fresno case, Lagattuta denied paying bonuses for specific medical procedures.

‘Injections, Injections, Injections’

Interviews with 17 former patients revealed common observations at Lags Medical clinics, such as crowded waiting rooms and an assembly-line environment. Many reported feeling pressure to consent to injections and other procedures or risk having their opioid supplies cut off.

Audrey Audelo Ramirez said she had worried for years that the care she was receiving at a Lags Medical clinic in Fresno was subpar. In the past couple of years, she said, there were sometimes so many patients waiting that the line wrapped around the building.

Ramirez, 52, suffers from trigeminal neuralgia, a rare nerve disease that sends shocks of pain across the face so severe it’s known as the “suicide disease.” Over the years, Lags Medical had taken over prescribing almost all her medications. This included not only the opioids and gabapentin she relies on to endure excruciating pain, but also drugs to treat depression, anxiety, and sleep issues.

Ramirez said she often felt pressured to get procedures she didn’t want. “They were always just pushing injections, injections, injections,” she said. She said staffers performed painful punch biopsies on her that resulted in an additional diagnosis of small fiber neuropathy, a nerve disorder that can cause stabbing pain.

She was among numerous patients who said they felt they needed to undergo the recommended procedures if they wanted continued prescriptions for their pain medications. “If you refuse any treatment they say they’re going to give you, you’re considered noncompliant and they stop your medication,” Ramirez said.

She said she eventually agreed to an injection in her face, which she said was administered without adequate sedation. “It was horrible, horrible,” she said. Still, she said, she kept going to the office because there weren’t many other options in her town.

Lagattuta, through his lawyer, declined a request from KHN to respond to questions about the care provided at his clinics, citing the state investigation. “Since there is an active investigation, Dr. Lagattuta cannot comment on it until it is completed,” attorney Matthew Brinegar wrote in an email. Lagattuta’s license remains in good standing, and he said in his deposition in the Fresno lawsuit that he is still seeing patients in California.

Experts interviewed by KHN noted that medical procedures such as injections can have a legitimate role in comprehensive pain management. But they also spoke in general terms about the emergence of a troubling pattern at U.S. pain clinics involving the overuse of procedures. In the 1990s and early 2000s, problematic pain clinics hooked patients on opioids, then demanded cash to continue prescriptions, said Dr. Theodore Parran, who is a professor of medicine at Case Western Reserve University and has served as an expert witness in federal investigations into pain clinics.

“What has replaced them are troubled pain clinics that hook patients with the meds and accept insurance, but overuse procedures which really pay well,” he said. For patients, he added, the consequences are not benign.

“I mean they are painful,” he said. “You’re putting needles into people.”

Cash Bonuses for Procedures

Before moving to California in 1998, Dr. Francis Lagattuta lived in Illinois and worked as a team doctor for the Chicago Bulls during its 1995-96 championship season. Out West, he opened a clinic in Santa Maria, a Latino-majority city along California’s Central Coast known for its strawberry fields, vineyards, and barbecue. From 2015 to 2020, the chain grew from a couple of clinics in Santa Barbara County to dozens throughout California, largely in rural areas, as well as far-flung locations in Washington state, Delaware, and Florida.

The California portion of the chain is organized as more than two dozen corporations and limited liability corporations owned by Lagattuta. His son, Francis P. Lagattuta II, was a manager for the company.

On the Lags Medical website and in conversation with employees, the elder Lagattuta claimed he was on the vanguard of diagnosing and treating small fiber neuropathy. Much of the website has now been taken down. But pages available via an archival site claim he had pioneered a three-pronged approach to pain management that made minimal use of opioids and surgeries, instead emphasizing testing, injections, mental health, diet, and exercise.

“In keeping with his social justice values, Dr. Lagattuta plans to share these findings to the rest of the world, hopefully to help solve the opioid crisis, and end suffering for millions of people struggling with pain,” touted a biography once highlighted on the website.

Dr. Francis Lagattuta (Twitter)

Numerous Lags Medical patients interviewed by KHN said that even when they were given punch biopsies and a subsequent diagnosis of neuropathy, their treatment plan continued to involve high doses of opioid medications.

Dr. Victor C. Wang, chief of the division of pain neurology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, said punch biopsies are occasionally used in research but are not a standard part of pain medicine. Instead, small fiber neuropathy is usually diagnosed with a simple clinical exam.

“The treatment is going to be the same whether you have a biopsy or not,” said Wang. “I always tell the fellows, you can do this test or that one, but is it really going to change the management of the patient?”

Ruby Avila, a mother of three in Visalia, remembers having the punch biopsies done at least three times during her four years as a Lags Medical patient. “I have scars down my leg,” she said. Each time, she said, providers removed a set of three skin specimens that were used to diagnose her with small fiber neuropathy.

Avila, 37, who has lived with pain since childhood, had found it validating to finally have a diagnosis. But after learning more about how common the biopsies were at Lags Medical, she was shaken. “It’s overwhelming to hear that they were doing it on a lot of people,” she said.

Sanchez, the nurse practitioner named in the Fresno lawsuit, spoke of other procedures that garnered bonuses: “Trigger point injections, knee injections, hip injections, foot injections for plantar fasciitis and elbow injections” all qualified for $10 bonuses, he said in his testimony.

Two former employees, who asked not to be named, echoed Sanchez, saying they were incentivized to do certain procedures, including injections and punch biopsies.

In his testimony in the Fresno case, Lagattuta denied paying bonuses for procedures. “It was only for the patients,” he said. “We never did it based on procedures.”

Incentive systems for a specific procedure are “completely unethical,” said Dr. Michael Barnett, an assistant professor of health policy at Harvard. “It’s like giving police officers a quota for speeding tickets. What do you think they’re going to do? I can’t think of any justification.”

Dr. Carl Johnson, 77, is a pathologist who directed Lags Medical’s Santa Maria lab from 2018 to 2021. Johnson said the only specimens he looked at came from punch biopsies, the first time in his long career as a pathologist that he had been asked to run such an analysis. On an average day, he said, he examined the slides of about 40 patients, searching for signs of small fiber neuropathy. Lagattuta gave him papers to read on peripheral neuropathy and assured him they were on the cutting edge of care for pain patients.

Johnson said he “never thought there was anything untoward going on” until he arrived on his last day and was told to pack up his belongings because the entire operation was shutting down.

Nerve Ablations and Drug Tests

Lags Medical performed other procedures at rates that also set them apart. From 2015 through 2020 — the span for which KHN had state data — Lags Medical performed more than 24,000 nerve ablations, a procedure in which part of a nerve is destroyed to reduce pain, on Medi-Cal patients. That’s more than 1 in 6 of all nerve ablations billed through Medi-Cal during that period.

An analysis of federal data also shows Lagattuta was an outlier. For example, in 2018 he billed Medicare for nerve ablations more often than 88% of the doctors in his field who performed the procedure.

Lags Medical also used the in-house lab to run drug tests on patients’ urine samples. From 2017 through 2019, Lags Medical facilities often ordered the most extensive — and expensive — set of drug tests, which check for the presence of at least 22 drugs, according to state and federal data.

For perspective, in 2019, more than 23,000 of the most extensive drug tests were ordered on Medi-Cal patients under Lagattuta’s provider number, more than double the number tied to the next highest biller. The next five top billers were all lab companies.

Overall, from 2017 through 2019, nearly 60,000 of the most extensive drug tests were billed to Medicare and Medi-Cal under Lagattuta’s provider number. Medicare reimbursed Lagattuta $5.4 million for these tests during that period. Using state fee-for-service rates, the testing billed to Medi-Cal would have been worth an estimated $6.3 million. That doesn’t include less extensive drug screens or those billed under other providers’ numbers.

Pain management experts described the use of extensive screening as unnecessary in routine pain treatment; the overuse of such tests has been the subject of numerous Medicare investigations in recent years.

Private pain clinics like Lags Medical are only loosely regulated and generally are not required to hold a special license from the state. But the physicians who work there are regulated by the Medical Board of California.

In December 2019, a patient who’d visited clinics in both Visalia and the Central Coast filed a complaint against Lagattuta with the medical board claiming, among other things, that she received biopsies that were not properly performed, that she underwent excessive testing, and that positive drug tests had been falsified. The medical board had another pain management doctor review more than 300 pages of documents and found “no deviations from the standard of care” and “did not find any over testing, or improperly performed biopsies.”

He did, however, find some record-keeping problems, including numerous procedures in which patient consent was not documented. He also found instances in which procedures were performed and repeated without documentation that they were effective. The patient who filed the complaint was given a medial branch nerve block in November 2014, followed by a radiofrequency ablation in December, and another in February. No improvements for the patient were ever noted in the charts, the investigating doctor found.

The medical board chalked it up to a record-keeping error and fined Lagattuta $350.

Opioids Needed for ‘Halfway-Normal Life’

On a warm evening in late July, Leah Munoz drove her power wheelchair around the long plastic tables at the Veterans Memorial Building in Hanford, a dusty farm town in California’s Central Valley. Senior bingo night was crowded with gray-haired players waiting for the game to begin. She found an empty spot and carefully set out $50 worth of bingo cards, alongside her collection of 14 brightly colored daubers.

Munoz, 55 and a mother of six, said she has suffered from a litany of illnesses — thyroid cancer, breast cancer, lupus, osteoarthritis — that leave her in near-constant pain. She’s been playing bingo since she was a little girl, and said it helps distract from the pain and calm her mind. She looks forward to this event all week.

Munoz was a Lags Medical patient for about four years and, while her pain never disappeared, the opioids prescribed provided enough relief for her to continue doing the things she loved. “There’s a difference between addiction and dependence. I need it to live a halfway-normal life,” Munoz said.

leah and ramon munoz

After Lags Medical closed in May, her primary care doctor initially refused to refill her opioid prescriptions. She said she called the Lags Medical offices to try to get a copy of her medical records to prove her need, and even showed up in person. But she said she was unable to get them. As the pills dwindled and the pain surged, Munoz said, it became hard to leave her home. “I missed a lot of bingo, a lot of grocery shopping, a lot of going to my grandkids’ birthday parties. You miss out on life,” she said. Ultimately, she said, her primary care doctor referred her to another pain clinic, and she was able to resume her prescription.

Even with pain medications, Munoz said, she never received true relief during her time as a patient at Lags Medical. She said she felt coerced to get several injections, none of which seemed to help. “If I didn’t get the procedures, I didn’t get the pain medication,” she said. Her husband, Ramon, a landscaper who was also a patient, received an injection there that he said left him with permanent stiffness in his neck.

Munoz knows at least five other people at bingo night who were former patients at Lags Medical. One of them, Rick Freeman, came over to her table to chat. He swayed back and forth as he walked, his knees, he explained, swollen after 35 years living with HIV. At Lags Medical, Freeman said, he felt pressured by staff to receive injections if he wanted to continue receiving his opioid prescriptions. “If you don’t cooperate with them, they would reduce your meds down,” he said.

At the front of the room, Gail Soto, who ran the event, sold bingo cards to the latecomers. Soto, 72, said she injured her back while working an administrative job at a construction company years ago and suffers from spinal stenosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and fibromyalgia. She, too, was a patient at Lags Medical for years. In addition to her opioid prescription, Soto said, she received repeated injections and three nerve ablations. At first, the ablations helped, but what staff members didn’t tell her, she said, was that the nerves they destroyed could grow back. Ultimately, she said, the procedures left her in worse pain.

Soto’s biggest concern is the spinal stimulator that she said Lags Medical surgically inserted into her back five years ago. She said the doctors told her the device would work so well that she would no longer need her pain pills. She said they didn’t explain that the device would work only two hours a day, and on one side of her body. She remained in too much pain to give up her meds, she said, and, five years later, the battery is failing.

Soto sleeps in a recliner chair in her three-bedroom mobile home in Lemoore, another small city near Hanford. It’s well kept but humble, and she and her husband keep a collection of wind chimes on the front porch that create a wave of gentle music when a breeze passes by.

The couple take good care of each other and their two beloved Chihuahuas, but life has become increasingly difficult for Soto. As the battery on her spinal stimulator has started to fail, she said, she has sudden electrical pulses that shoot up her body.

GAIL SOTO

“My husband says sometimes when I sleep that my body will just jump up in the air,” she said. But now that Lags Medical is closed, she said, she can’t find a doctor willing to remove the device. “Most doctors are telling me right now, ‘We can’t, because we didn’t [put it in]. We don’t want nothing to do with that.’”

Waitlists and Withdrawal

Audrey Audelo Ramirez said she picked up her final refill from Lags Medical on June 4 and by July 4 had no meds left to treat her pain. Ramirez said she called every pain management clinic in Fresno, but none were taking new patients.

“They left us all high and dry,” she said. “Everybody.”

In the weeks that followed the closures, county officials throughout the Central Valley saw a flood of patients on high doses of opioids in search of new providers, they said. Patients couldn’t access their medical records, so other providers had no idea what their treatments had been.

“We had to create a crisis response to it because there was no organized response at that time,” said Dr. Rais Vohra, the interim health officer for Fresno County.

Fresno County’s health system is already lean, Vohra said. Toss in this abrupt closure and you end up in the kind of crisis rarely seen in other fields of medicine: “You’d never do this with a cancer clinic,” he said. “You’d never abruptly stop chemo.”

The state asked Dr. Phillip Coffin, director of substance abuse research for the San Francisco Department of Public Health, to run provider training and persuade doctors to take on new patients. Many practices have rules against taking new patients on opioids, or will refuse to prescribe doses above certain thresholds.

“We know that when you stop prescribing opioids, some people end up with death from suicide, overdose, increased illicit opioid use, pain exacerbations. It’s really important to have a continuity, and that is not really possible in the current opioid-prescribing culture,” Coffin said. The threat to patients is so severe that the FDA issued a warning in 2019 against cutting patients off from prescription opioids.

Gina, a retired nurse who asked to be identified by only her first name for fear she’d be discriminated against by other doctors, had been a Lags Medical patient for six years. She said she called every practice she could find in her Central Coast town, and was put on a waiting list at one. Suffering from a severe case of scoliosis, she started rationing the pain pills she had come to rely on.

When she finally secured an appointment, she said, she was told by the doctor she was on “some very strong meds” and he would fill only one of her two prescriptions. “You’re like a criminal,” she said. “You’re branded as ‘we don’t trust you.’”

She started experiencing withdrawal symptoms — sweating, lost appetite, sleeplessness, anxiety. Worst of all, her pain “came back with a vengeance,” she said.

“I think about this, what I’d have been like if I’d never gone through pain management. I sometimes wonder if I’d be better off.”

As for Ramirez, her primary care doctor finally secured an appointment for her at another pain clinic, she said. It was in the same space as the old Lags Medical clinic, and she said she recognized many of the staff members. But now there was a new name: Central California Pain Management. From her perspective, it was as if nothing had changed. And she still doesn’t know whether she needs to worry about the care she received during more than four years at Lags Medical.

This story was produced by Kaiser Health News. Senior correspondent Jordan Rau and Phillip Reese, an assistant professor of journalism at California State University-Sacramento, contributed to this report.

I Was Mask Shamed for Having Invisible Illness

By Carol Levy, PNN Columnist

For years I have worn shirts on which I write my political position. I love wearing them. And I wear them proudly. But since the onset of covid and masking, I have worn a different shirt that reads:

“Can’t mask due to medical issue. Trigeminal neuralgia. I have a doctor's note. I am fully vaccinated and boosted.”

This shirt I do not wear proudly. My medical situation is no one's business but my own. But to keep people from yelling at me, I wear the shirt. And it works. People are usually nice about it.

That was not the case when I went to my local hospital for a blood test. Since covid, if I needed to go to the hospital, I called first to tell them, “I can't mask due to a medical issue. Will this be a problem?”

I was told I had to get permission from administrators, but ultimately got the go-ahead to come in.  I’ve been to the hospital a few more times for tests. Each time they let me in with no or little fuss, so when I had to go the last time, I did not call first.

The welcome desk receptionist signed me in, no issue. The registrar signed me in, no issue. I sat for about 20 minutes, noticed by employees and ignored by them, while waiting for my name to be called.

Then a woman dressed in medical scrubs came over to me with a mask in her hand. She did not take me aside. She confronted me right in front of other patients: “You have to wear a mask or leave.”

“No, I can't wear a mask for medical reasons,” I told her. “In fact, I have been in here two or three times with no problem.”

She reiterated: “You have to put on a mask.”

“No, I can't mask. I have a facial pain disorder and can't wear a mask. That why I wear this shirt,” I said, pointing to my shirt.

Another woman joined the fray: “You have to leave if you won’t mask.”

I was getting angry. “I have trigeminal neuralgia. Do you know what that is? Are you nurses?” I asked. “If not, go look it up. I can't wear a mask. And I have come here a few times since covid with no problem about my not being able to mask. Do you think I like wearing this shirt?  You shouldn’t be talking to me like this in a public setting.”

The two women walked away, only to call me back a few minutes later, into a room that was still within earshot and view of other patients. A man in lab clothes had joined them. The woman in purple scrubs (I found out later neither she nor the other woman were nurses or medical people) held out a plastic shield, “You can wear this.”  

I felt defeated, but no one was going to force me to set off the pain by wearing a shield. “No, I told you. I can't have anything on my face.” 

She pushed the plastic shield towards me. “You have to wear one of these then.”

I was trying to remain calm. “Do you know what trigeminal neuralgia is? There is a reason they call it the worst pain known to man and the suicide disease.”  

She continued to insist, “You have to mask.” Then the man spoke up.  "I'm the lab tech.  I won't let you in the lab or take your blood unless you mask.”   

Finally, for some unbeknownst reason, they capitulated. Immediately after registration I was told to walk to the lab. The technician who stated unequivocally that he wouldn't let me into the lab or take my blood did both. 

It was a horrid experience, humiliating because it was done publicly. Mortifying in that I had to defend having pain from an invisible illness. Despicable in that I was forced to fight to stop them from demanding I make the pain worse. Just one more unanticipated horror of being a chronic pain patient.  

Had I said, “I can't mask. I have a lung issue,” and they saw an oxygen tank, chances are good I would have been left alone or quickly taken care of. 

But I said I had something they couldn't see and had never heard of. To them it seemed bizarre. “You can’t touch your face without pain?” That must be made up. 

In the world of covid, how much extra do we have to endure?   I ask myself, often, will there ever be a time, covid or not, when I won't have to explain myself?

Carol Jay Levy has lived with trigeminal neuralgia, a chronic facial pain disorder, for over 30 years. She is the author of “A Pained Life, A Chronic Pain Journey.”  Carol is the moderator of the Facebook support group “Women in Pain Awareness.” Her blog “The Pained Life” can be found here.

Revised CDC Opioid Guideline a ‘Band Aid for a Stab Wound’

By Emily Ullrich, Guest Columnist

After years of state sanctioned torture, people in pain have finally received a small reprieve from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in the form of a revised draft of the agency’s opioid prescribing guideline.

In the new draft, the CDC acknowledges some of the harm inflicted by its 2016 guideline, by adding language that gives doctors more flexibility in prescribing opioids and encourages them to practice “individualized patient centered care.”

While this perspective is a welcome departure from the original guideline, we need to go further. As a disabled chronically ill patient, I have personally experienced the stigma and misinformation that comes with being prescribed opioids. As a patient advocate, I’ve also watched in horror as an untold number of suffering patients deprived of opioids committed suicide.

There are four main issues that still need to be addressed by the CDC. The first is that many patients on long-term opioid therapy have rare diseases such as Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Because these and other incurable illnesses aren’t even mentioned in the guideline, it is assumed that most pain patients have treatable conditions such as low back pain or acute injuries that will improve with time. This is not the case. There is a large segment of the patient population that cannot be cured. For them, symptom management with opioid medication is their only option.

Second, it’s important to emphasize that all patients are different. Individual factors like genetics, metabolism, tolerance and more can determine how opioids affect a patient.  A dose that may be “a lot” for one patient might be very ineffective and too low a dose for others.

Third, because of the harms that have been imposed upon pain patients, it is extremely important that providers be advised to treat them with compassion and respect.  Stigma, shame and puritanical morals-based thinking that paints people with pain as having “character flaws” only inflicts more harm and makes it more difficult for them to get help.

Finally, although the CDC has abandoned its previous recommendation that daily opioid doses not exceed 90 morphine milligram equivalents (MME), I can't help but notice new language in the guideline draft that cautions doctors about exceeding 50 MME, a dose that is low for many patients. I fear that 50 MME will be taken above all the other verbiage of the 2022 guideline and be enforced as the new hard limit.

The revised guideline is a small step in the right direction, but patients need more than a band aid for a stab wound.

Emily Ullrich lives with CRPS, Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction, Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, endometriosis, Interstitial Cystitis, migraine, fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis and chronic pancreatitis.

Pain Patients Have Low Rates of Illicit Drug Use

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Anti-opioid activists have long claimed that opioid medication is a gateway drug to heroin and other street drugs. That myth is so ingrained in the medical community that many pain patients are discriminated against by doctors and pharmacists, who suspect they are abusing their medication or using illicit drugs.

But a large new study by Millennium Health pokes a hole in that myth, finding that patients being treated in pain management practices are far less likely to use heroin, fentanyl, cocaine and methamphetamine than other patients.

The drug testing firm analyzed the lab results of two million urine tests from 2015 to 2021 – nearly 600,000 coming from pain patients -- and found that patients seeing primary care physicians, behavioral health doctors (psychiatrists and psychologists), or getting substance use disorder (SUD) treatment were significantly more likely to test positive for street drugs than patients of pain management providers.

SOURCE: MILLENNIUM HEALTH

“That’s one of the reasons why we decided to put this out there in the public domain, because it’s important. Because clearly there are differences across these groups,” said Eric Dawson, PharmD, Vice President of Clinical Affairs at Millennium Health.

For example, the positivity rate for fentanyl in urine samples is about 2% for pain management patients – a level that remained stable throughout the 6-year study period.

But Millennium found that for primary care and behavioral health patients, the positivity rate for fentanyl has ticked up to about 5 percent.

In patients getting SUD treatment, the positivity rate has skyrocketed to about 17 percent, no doubt a reflection of the growing presence of illicit fentanyl in street drugs.

Positivity rates for methamphetamine are also rising for most patients – but not for pain patients – while cocaine use has remained relatively flat. Positivity rates for heroin have declined steadily for all patients since 2015, according to Millennium.

“Generally speaking, the pain population that’s treated with opioids is an older population and uses illicit drugs at a very low rate,” said Steven Passik, PhD, VP of Scientific Affairs and Head of Clinical Data Programs at Millennium.

“Not only are they low, they remain low,” says Dawson. “So many of the other groups, over time their positivity rates are increasing. The pain population started low and remains low. And that says they are different than the other groups.”

What makes the findings even more striking is that they include the first two years of the covid pandemic, a time when stress, isolation and depression led many people to abuse drugs.

“But that did not happen in the pain patients. You can actually see that,” says Passik, who believes regular drug testing makes pain management patients less likely to take risks that might affect their healthcare. He thinks the Millennium study should be reviewed by both providers and policymakers to get a better understanding of people in pain.

“There isn’t that much data like this out there. I think it’s unique and very positive about this population. And I think that should be factored in when people are talking about access to opioids,” Passik told PNN.

In addition to fentanyl, heroin and other street drugs, the Millennium study also looked at positivity rates for marijuana, which have soared in recent years due to the legalization of medical and recreational cannabis in many states. By the end of 2021, the positivity rate for cannabis had reached nearly 32 percent for most patients. But, like the other drugs, cannabis use remained relatively low for pain patients.  

Study Finds Low Risk of Muscle Pain From Statins

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Have you experienced muscle pain, memory loss or other side effects from statins? If so, you’re not alone. A many as one in two patients stop taking the cholesterol-lowering drugs because they don’t like the side-effects.

But the authors of a large new study say statin intolerance is over-estimated and over-diagnosed, resulting in too many patients raising their risk of heart disease because they refuse to take the drugs.

An international team of researchers conducted a meta-analysis of 176 clinical studies involving over 4 million statin users and found that only about 9 percent have statin intolerance. Their findings are published in the journal European Heart Journal.

“I believe the size of our study, which is the largest in the world to investigate this question, means we are able to finally and effectively answer the question about the true prevalence of statin intolerance,” said lead author Maciej Banach, MD, a cardiologist and professor at Medical University of Lodz and the University of Zielona Góra in Poland.

“Patients need to know that statins may prolong their life, and in cases where side effects appear, we have enough knowledge to manage these effectively. The most important message to patients as a result of this study is that they should keep on taking statins according to the prescribed dose, and discuss any side effects with their doctor, rather than discontinuing the medication.”

The research team found that patients who are older, female, obese, diabetic, or suffering from an under-active thyroid or chronic liver or kidney failure were more likely to be statin intolerant.

Patients taking drugs used to control an irregular heartbeat or calcium channel blockers for chest pain and high blood pressure were also more likely to have side effects, as did those with high alcohol consumption.

“It is critically important to know about these risk factors so that we can predict effectively that a particular patient is at higher risk of statin intolerance. Then we can consider upfront other ways to treat them in order to reduce the risk and improve adherence to treatment. This could include lower statin doses, combination therapy and use of innovative new drugs,” said Banach. 

“Most cases of statin intolerance observed in clinical practice are associated with effects caused by patients’ misconceptions about the side effects of statins or may be due to other reasons. Therefore, we should carefully evaluate symptoms, assessing in detail patients’ medical histories, when the symptoms appeared, specific details of pain, other medications the patients are taking, and other conditions and risk factors. Then we will see that statins can be used safely in most patients.”

Previous research on side effects from statins have had mixed results. A 2017 study found that only about 2 percent of patients on Lipitor (atorvastatin) had muscle pain. That finding is in marked contrast to a Cleveland Clinic study, which found that 42% of patients taking Lipitor reported muscle pain and weakness.

In 2014, the Food and Drug Administration required warning labels on statins, cautioning that statins can cause a muscle injury called myopathy, which is characterized by muscle pain or weakness. In rare instances, the FDA says statins can also cause liver injury, diabetes and memory loss.

A Painful Shift in News Coverage

By Roger Chriss, PNN Columnist

Chronic pain has not gone away. But media coverage of it has dropped off. Not only are there fewer news stories about chronic pain, but the focus has shifted. Most stories about opioids these days deal with lawsuits and overdoses, not how they are helpful in treating pain.

U.S. media coverage and public interest in chronic appears to be trending downward. According to Google Trends, the number of web searches using the term “chronic pain” peaked in 2018 and have dropped to levels of a decade ago.

Google searches for “opioids” also peaked in 2018 and are now trending downward.

Searches for “medical cannabis” are likewise trending downward. The focus of news coverage is also changing. Stories today about medical cannabis tend to look at legislation and business, not whether cannabis is useful for medical conditions.

Even the opioid crisis turns out not be so interesting anymore. Google Trends shows searches for “opioid crisis” peaking in 2017 and a steep decline ever since.

There is, fortunately, some ongoing interest in pain management. Google Trends shows only a slight decline in searches for “pain management” in recent years.

Americans are losing interest in not only opioids and pain, but also addiction and public health. In 2018, according to Pew Research, 42% of U.S. adults said drug addiction was a major problem in their community. By October 2021, only 35% said that.  

It would be easy to attribute this to the pandemic. But Americans are losing interest in that, too. Surveys taken as the Omicron variant crested early this year across the U.S. showed that more Americans now believe we should “learn to live” with the pandemic and “get back to normal,” rather than treat it as an ongoing public health emergency.  

“The findings come at a possible turning point in the pandemic, as several Democratic governors announced intentions to ease some mask mandates over the next month. The growing frustration with pandemic restrictions may help explain some of those early announcements — even as cases reach record levels,” Press News Agency reported. 

But the prevalence of chronic painful disorders has not changed. In fact, the problem is getting worse because long Covid is fast becoming a new painful long-term illness for millions of people  And the pain of cancer, trauma and life-limiting chronic illness remains the same. But there is, sadly, less and less interest in the subject. 

Roger Chriss lives with Ehlers Danlos syndrome and is a proud member of the Ehlers-Danlos Society. Roger is a technical consultant in Washington state, where he specializes in mathematics and research.